Archive - Mar 26, 2012

I have always wanted to be liked and respected.--Juice

While it appears to us that Bernanke's message was loud and clear, there are those who need validation and peer-confirmation. Such as that from the firm whose alumni run the Fed, namely Goldman Sachs. Below is Jan Hatzius' take on the "surprising" Chairman speech which essentially said QE can and will come at any time there is a downtick in the market, masked by the unemployment rate rising to its fair value, as estimated by Gallup, somewhere around 9%.

According to Barron's as much as 91% of “triple” ETF’s might be owned by individual investors.  That figure seems shocking, and as the article admits, could be wrong, but it is scary.  The activity in TVIX the past few weeks does indicate a strong retail presence – we would like to think professionals didn’t bid something up to an 80% premium to NAV, knowing that the share creation process could be re-instated, virtually assuring that the premium would collapse to 0. We don’t see a need for these products except for small retail investors who can’t get leverage any other way, and we suspect they don’t understand how these things really work, as they are the most likely to buy and hold these things.

Earlier this morning, strategically timed just in advance of the Chairman's tacit admission that everything attempted to date has once again failed to stimulate the economy as now both housing and soon employment have resume their drop, New York Fed released a note titled "Prospects for the U.S. Labor Market" which in not so many words explains why there are none. While the analysis is the same that has been presented here over and over, confirming that the jobs recovery has been anything but, and thus setting the stage for today's Bernanke preannouncement to either a March NFP miss or more QE at the April FOMC meeting as Bill Gross tweeted yesterday, it has one chart that shows why when it comes to restoring a virtuous cycle this time is different, and why endless central planning may have finally broken traditional economic assumptions. The chart below is perhaps the only one worth noting. Spot the odd "recovery" out.

Treasuries have rallied on the hope being handed out by Bernanke, recovering overnight losses after gains from last week moving more Goldman muppets back into pain. What's different this time from last week's rally is the notable underperformance of the long-end relative to the front-end. While still red from Friday's close, 2s through 7s are almost back to unchanged and 4-5bps off overnight high yields. 30Y however is still +4.5bps and only 1.5bps off the high yields overnight. 2s10s30s has fallen notably (which should be risk-negative) but for now - all the equity market can see is a centrally planned equity market rally to float all boats. It seems to us that the long-end remains stuck in the mud on long-run worries over the print-big-of-go-home attitude that was just reaffirmed.

Decrypting the subtle nuances of Bernanke's speech this morning was hardly a surprise. The key is 'unemployment' and whether its structural or cyclical - we'll ease anyway (just in case). Debase first or most  or lose... 86 mentions of 'unemployment', No mention of 'inflation', and no mention of 'oil-price-inspired-consumption-slump' or 'debase'. 'Structural' 16: 'Cyclical' 8

Curious why futures and PMs both soared out of the gate at 8am? Look no further than the Chairman of the Federal CTRL-Preserve who is speaking at the National Association for Business Economics and just made a very strong hint that the New QE (or is that the NEWER QE) is coming. And there are those mocking Bill Gross for saying the April FOMC would lead to the next QE announcement (something we expounded on extensively yesterday). And here is the most idiotic statement uttered by the Fed: "If this hypothesis is wrong and structural factors are in fact explaining much of the increase in long-term unemployment, then the scope for countercyclical policies to address this problem will be more limited.  Even if that proves to be the case, however, we should not conclude that nothing can be done." Recall what JPM said about central planning breaking the virtuous cycle just two days ago. The Fed has just admitted it... but it does not mean that the Fed will be forced to print print print infinitely more. After all, it's all there is.

Confirming once again that when it came to last year's LTRO desperation, the operation was nothing but the latest attempt at filling liquidity holes at insolvent banks, and nothing to do with facilitating lending, is the interview by Helsingin Sanomat with ECB council member Joerg Asmussen, according to which there would be no more LTROs until the ECB found out what it is the LTROs actually do. From Bloomberg: "The European Central Bank won’t provide more long-term loans until it has studied how the funds are distributed into the economy, council member Joerg Asmussen told newspaper Helsingin Sanomat. “We need to see how this liquidity feeds through over the next few months,” Asmussen said, according to a transcript of an interview with the Finnish newspaper on March 24 and published today." Well supposedly this means that with everyone now looking the ECB squarely in the eyes while also looking askance at $10/gallon European gas, there will be no more LTROs "for at least a few months" as the ECB actually figures out what it has done. Which also explains why the need to redirect from one bailout process, now topped out as the LTRO no longer is pushing the European economy higher, to another: the old narrative of EFSF+ESM expansion, so prudently picked up over the weekend by Angela Merkel.

• BOJ Crosses Rubicon With Desperate Monetary Policy, Hirano Says (Bloomberg)
• Europe’s bailout bazooka is proving to be a toy gun (FT)
• Monti Signals Spanish Euro Risk as EU to Bolster Firewall (FT)
• Merkel set to allow firewall to rise (FT)
• Banks set to cut $1tn from balance sheets (FT)
• Supreme Court weighs historic healthcare law (Reuters)
• Spain PM denied symbolic austerity boost in local vote (Reuters)
• Anti-war movement stirs in Israel (FT)
• Obama to Ask China to Toughen Korea Line (WSJ)
• Pimco’s Gross Says Fed May ‘Hint’ at QE3 at April Meeting (Bloomberg)

Remember all those European PMIs which imploded over the past month, destroying any hopes of a rapid rebound from Europe's technical recession? You can forget them now because the one indicator which tracks the level of the manipulated stock market more than anything else, German IFO business survey, just came better than expected, at a whopping 109.8 compared to expectations of 109.6 print, same as the previous one. And that is all it takes for futures, and the EURUSD to ramp, which in turn plants the seeds for another confidence ramp next month and so on. Here is Goldman's take: "The assessment of current conditions remained unchanged at 117.4, while expectations increase to a level of 102.7 after 102.4. Looking at the different sectors it shows that confidence in the manufacturing sector was broadly stable on a high level (14.0 after 14.3), while construction saw a small decline after a surge over the last couple of months (2.3 after 3.3; confidence stood at -13.2 in October). Confidence in the retail sector also recorded a strong gain (106.6 after 3.7), while wholesale saw a decline (12.8 after 15.0). This is a strong report with business conditions remaining significantly above their long-term average of 101.1. The rebound in business conditions after a soft spot during October to January is indicative for a rebound in the underlying momentum in the economy." Well, no, if anything it is indactive that Germans were happy to reap the benefits of a few trillion in liquidity which in turn pushed markets higher, and making Germans even more confident despite the big miss in German PMI in March. But for now a big drop in the market is unwelcome so let's focus on reflexive, Catch 22 indicators. Even Goldman is perplexed on the spin: "Only the release of the 'hard' data in the coming weeks will show which survey is giving the correct signal with respect to the underlying momentum of the German economy. But in any case, the March IFO argues against taking, at least for now, the PMIs at face value."

All you need to read and more.