This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
Guest Post: The Purpose Behind Engineered Economic Collapse
- Alan Greenspan
- Barack Obama
- Bond
- China
- Credit Crisis
- Exxon
- Fail
- Federal Reserve
- Federal Reserve Bank
- fixed
- Germany
- goldman sachs
- Goldman Sachs
- Greece
- Guest Post
- Housing Bubble
- Housing Market
- Hyperinflation
- International Monetary Fund
- Jim Rogers
- Meltdown
- Michael Moore
- Naked Short Selling
- None
- Peter Schiff
- Reality
- recovery
- Reserve Currency
- Ron Paul
- Savings And Loan
- Too Big To Fail
- Transparency
- Yuan
By Giordano Bruno, of Neithercorp Press
The Purpose Behind Engineered Economic Collapse
“From now on, depressions will be scientifically created.” — Congressman Charles A. Lindbergh Sr. , 1913
Everyone loves money. Even people like myself who abhor the abuse of
money and commerce, who understand the fraudulent nature of the system
we live in, still work hard and save so that we might attain a sense of
stability within that system. Many people see money as a focal point to
their existence. But is it really money that they are after, or is it
something else entirely? In truth, money represents ‘security’ in the
minds of the masses. Money affords us the ability to survive, and the
more of it we have, the safer we all feel. Because we subconsciously
associate the extension of our very life with the variable health of the
economic structure in which we live, we tend to become unwitting
devotees to its continued existence, even if it is corrupt and condemned
to failure. We gullibly deny the system or the currency that supports
it is doomed to the contrary of all evidence because, even though it has
beaten us bloody, we have never known anything else.
In light of this entrenched way of perceiving things, especially in
the U.S., it is difficult enough to convince some people that the
economy is in fact not providing the security they desire, but is
actually destroying their future completely. To explain to them that
this is deliberate, that the economy is designed to self-destruct, that
is another prospect altogether.
Many people hit a proverbial wall on this issue because they simply
cannot fathom that certain groups of men (globalists and central
bankers) view money and economy in completely different terms than they
do. The average American lives within a tiny box when it comes to the
mechanics and motivations of finance. They think that their monetary
desires and drives are exactly the same as a globalist’s. But, what
they don’t realize is that the box they think in was BUILT by
globalists. This is why the actions of big banks and the decisions of
our mostly corporate establishment run government seem so insane in the
face of common sense. We try to rationalize their behavior as “idiocy”,
but the reality is that their goals are highly deliberate and so far
outside what we have been taught to expect that some of us lack a point
of reference. If you cannot see the endgame, you will not understand
the steps taken to reach it until it is too late.
In the past we have covered numerous instances in which global
bankers have admitted to fraud on a massive scale, fraud which is now
crushing our already fragile economy. We have covered the private
Federal Reserve and how it knowingly facilitated the creation of the
housing bubble, as well as how it is now inflating a Treasury bubble
which is soon to implode. We have covered Goldman Sachs and its efforts
to promote and sell toxic derivatives all over the world while at the
same time betting against those derivatives on the open market. We have
covered the manipulation of gold and silver markets by companies like
JP Morgan, which have recently been exposed by whistleblowers and GATA
investigations. And, most importantly, we have executed in-depth
analysis on the growing weakness of the U.S. dollar in preparation for
severe currency devaluation. These revelations raise questions, which
is natural, but they also illicit misconceptions and reckless knee-jerk
reactions, especially when broaching the fact that the illegal
strategies of international banks are part of a greater agenda.
Below, we will examine some of the most common narrow minded
responses to the issue of engineered economic collapse, as well as why
people think the way they do when the “semi-sacred” subject of money is
involved…
1. The economy is too complex to be controlled by just a handful of people…
This response often comes from people who make presumptions on
economics, rather than actually educating themselves on how the system
works. From the outside looking in, the world of finance appears
chaotic; a mixture of mathematical and legal standards swirling in a
void of mass psychology. Many Americans are either frightened off by
the seemingly complicated field of study, or they find it rather boring
and not worth their time. This, however, does not stop them from
assuming that they know how money works.
The problem is that just because a person participates in his economy
daily, it does not mean he has any understanding of how it operates.
Many watch television on a daily basis, but few have any idea how the
picture actually gets onto the screen, or how to fix a television once
it is broken. Sadly, our egocentric culture has led a substantial
portion of the public to imagine that they are experts on EVERYTHING,
and thus, true researchers in the fields of economics and globalism get
reactions like the one above constantly.
At bottom, once all the quasi-technical biz-babble used by mainstream
talking heads is removed from the equation, economics is rather simple.
Supply and Demand will always be at the center of any and every
economy, regardless of the political atmosphere it exists in. These two
fundamental factors can be manipulated to a point, by the creation of
artificial supply, or the conjuring of false demand. This is achieved
in many ways by global bankers, but primarily through domination of the
issuance of currency, the ability to change interest rates at will, as
well as the ability to inject or remove incredible sums of money from
any market.
A perfect example is the suppression of silver prices by JP Morgan:
http://www.zerohedge.com/article/whistleblower-exposes-jp-morgans-silver-manipulation-scheme
Gold and silver represent competing currencies to the fiat dollars
created by the Federal Reserve, and suppressing the value of these
commodities helps to ensure that the public will never see them as a
viable alternative to paper assets. JP Morgan, who along with other
international banks has the ability to throw around massive quantities
of capital wherever they please, suppresses the value of physical silver
by issuing paper securities for silver that doesn’t actually exist
(creating an artificially high supply), and naked short selling silver
markets to drive them lower (creating the false impression of low
demand).
Another good example of economic manipulation is the private Federal
Reserve’s strategy during the 90’s under Alan Greenspan to artificially
lower interest rates, allowing banks to issue credit at historical
levels for over a decade. Linked below is an article from Ron Paul’s
‘Texas Straight Talk’ dated March, 2007, before the housing market even
began its full swan-dive. In it, he discusses the Federal Reserve’s
direct role in the creation of the housing bubble:
http://www.house.gov/paul/tst/tst2007/tst031907.htm
Men like Ron Paul, Peter Schiff, Gerald Celente, Jim Rogers, and many
others were able to predict long before hand that the Federal Reserve’s
actions were creating an explosive mortgage and credit bubble, yet, we
are supposed to believe that the Federal Reserve had “no idea” that
their actions would result in a debt implosion?
Catherine Austen Fitts, former Assistant Secretary of Housing and
Commissioner of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
under the first Bush Administration stated conversely that the mortgage
bubble was absolutely not an accident, and that she had witnessed
outright and deliberate fraud on the part of the U.S. government and the
Federal Reserve Bank in creating the bubble. The fact that disturbed
her most, however, was her discovery that only a small handful of
international banks were responsible for the perpetuation of toxic
mortgage debt, not just in America, but around the world:
http://solari.com/blog/?p=2058
Goldman Sachs (one of the primary globalist banks involved in the
igniting of the debt crisis) was caught red-handed selling toxic
derivatives to investors and governments all over the planet while at
the same time betting against those derivatives on the market. Goldman
even bet against mortgage securities the bank itself created!
This is sort of similar to a car maker selling vehicles without brake
lines, then placing bets that their clients will crash and burn.
Essentially, it is blatant and sociopathic fraud! Goldman’s actions
directly contributed to credit collapses in numerous countries,
including Greece, and here in the U.S.
The idea that global banks can turn the economy on and off like a
light switch may be a stretch, but the vast majority of evidence shows
that they do have the ability to shift the direction of markets to a
point, as well as the ability to spur the growth of bubbles that
eventually lead to recessions, depressions, and beyond. In fact, if one
examines the U.S. economy from the inception of the Federal Reserve in
1913, they would find that the past century has been nothing but a
series of engineered equity bubbles designed to slowly hobble, but not
completely cripple, our financial system and our currency, at least,
until recently. Like a steam locomotive on a collision course with a
bottomless canyon, globalist banks can slow or speed up the pace of our
descent, but the final destination never changes.
Now that we have established that market collapses can be created by a
small handful of bankers and done knowingly, lets move on to the next
most common sheeple-like talking point.
2. Yes, international banks triggered the meltdown, but the
“greed of Capitalism” is truly to blame (i.e. Its all the Republican
Party’s fault)…
First off, if you’re parroting the fiscal debate points of two
dimensional socialist gatekeepers like Michael Moore, then you’re
already hopelessly lost in the mind warping hedge maze of the false
left/right paradigm. You should stay as far away as possible from adult
conversions on economics, especially if you plan on associating the
“greed” of capitalism and corporatism with the Republican Party alone.
News Flash! Barack Obama received far more in corporate campaign
donations (including donations from BP and Exxon) than McCain did. Both
Bush Jr. and Obama increased government spending to record levels
meaning Neo-Conservatives are in no way “conservative” (as a true
Republican is supposed to be). Obama has consistently surrounded
himself with banksters and corporate lobbyists, including various
hobgoblins from the bowels of Goldman Sachs. BOTH major parties are
owned and operated by global banks. This is a cold hard undeniable
truth of our political system. There is no way around it. Learn it,
accept it as reality, and stop trying to blame one side or the other for
problems that both sides created! If you cannot do this, your view of
our cultural state of affairs will always be horribly skewed and your
insights on our social problems will be utterly worthless.
While wannabe socialists desperately clamor to point fingers at the
free market ideology as the cause of all our ills, the fact is that none
of us have ever lived in a truly free market system. Since the
inception of the Federal Reserve in 1913, all markets and even our own
currency have become more and more vulnerable to manipulation by the
banking elite. We have lived our entire lives in a rigged market, not a
free market. To blame the very concept of Capitalism for our current
dire circumstances is not only naïve, it is dangerous. Globalists would
like nothing better than to promote the illusion that “too much
freedom” led us to this disaster, and that severe controls must be put
into place to ensure that it “never happens again”.
3. Global banks would never engineer the collapse of the U.S. economy or the Dollar. It makes them too much money…
This often heard song and dance ties in with the number two comment
above. Again, the assumption is that the globalists only do what they
do out of an “uncontrollable greed for money”. This perpetuates a
couple fallacies. First, it encourages the false belief that the end
concern for the Elite is the accumulation of riches. Central bankers
have the ability to PRINT all the money they want from thin air!
Remember, the Federal Reserve has never been subjected to a full audit,
meaning they could easily create billions if not trillions without any
oversight whatsoever. Greed for money, to them, is surely an absurd
notion. What they do want, more than anything else, is social power.
They want control over every living human being without question. All
other concerns are secondary.
The next fallacy underlying the above argument is the conjecture that
the U.S. economy is somehow indispensable to global banks. This is
simply not so. Where we see the economy as an extension of our culture
and ourselves, the Elites see financial systems as mere tools in the
pursuit of a greater goal: World Government. Imagine you are building a
house. Once your saw has fulfilled its intended role of cutting the
wood, do you cling to it, or do you throw it aside and pick up a hammer?
This is how globalists look at financial systems. They are perfectly
willing to cast off the U.S. economy like a snake shedding skin if it
brings them closer to attaining their ultimate aim.
The same goes for the Dollar. The Greenback may be the premier world
reserve currency now, but that can and likely will change very quickly
over the next couple years. The Dollar is a device that has outlived
its usefulness as far as global bankers are concerned. The IMF has on
several occasions made it clear that they eventually intend for the SDR
(Special Drawing Rights) to replace the Dollar as the world reserve
currency, and they have openly admitted that it will one day be
established as a global currency. IMF press releases make this
development sound far off and away, but SDR accumulations by countries
around the world have risen dramatically in the past year. This along
with other factors we will cover (namely China’s preparations to dump
their U.S. T-bond holdings) show that IMF actions indicate they are
preparing for a collapse of the Dollar now!
4. China would never dump U.S. Treasuries because it would hurt them as much as it hurts us…
The theory that China is somehow fused to the U.S. in a kind of
symbiotic seesaw relationship that can never be broken is so ingrained
among mainstream American financial analysts it simply will not die,
regardless of how much contradictory evidence you show them. It really
is like a mental disease which causes MSM pundits to go into involuntary
Tourettic convulsions every time you mention the words “Treasury bond
dump”. America and China are not conjoined twins, and one can survive
without the other. We have covered the China issue over and over again,
and I will not rehash all that evidence here. To lay it out simply:
China has re-engineered its economy towards consumption and importation
rather than relying on exports. The IMF has talked about this on many
occasions with apparent excitement:
http://www.imf.org/external/np/tr/2010/tr072910c.htm
China has also finalized the ASEAN trading bloc which has combined
export markets at least equal to that of the U.S. Meaning, China
already has another place to send its exports besides America.
Most importantly, China must increase their currency’s value if their
new consumer based system is to survive. Allowing the Yuan to rise
sharply in value will revitalize the buying power of the Chinese
populace making greater consumption possible. Indeed, China MUST dump
their Treasury holdings and pump up the Yuan if they are to hold their
economy together. And, the Federal Reserve has given China every reason
to turn its back on Treasuries through never ending liquidity
injections. This is not to say that a U.S. collapse will not affect
them, it would negatively affect the entire world. However, China has
positioned itself to survive, and perhaps even thrive with their
economic expansions into Africa, and their new financial agreements with
Germany.
Finally, the Chinese have been very forthcoming over the past week
about plans to drop Treasuries. China has dumped over 7.7% of their
U.S. T-Bond holdings since January, including the biggest T-bond dump on
record this month. They have openly admitted to a plan to diversify
away from the Dollar:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-08-17/china-cuts-long-term-treasury-holdings-by-most-ever-as-u-s-yields-decline.html
I’m always fascinated by those economists who vehemently deny China will
ever turn away from the U.S. Dollar while they are doing so right in
plain view. Are MSM analysts simply crazy? I don’t know, but it would
explain a lot…
5. Sure, bankers took advantage, but it’s really the American people’s fault for getting suckered…
Yes, a sizable portion of the American public can be gut wrenchingly
stupid. It hurts my head and my feelings to see people act so idiotic,
it really does. The problem with this argument though is that when it
is taken too far it becomes an attempt to divert blame away from the
criminals and place it on the victims. If you knowingly leave your
front door unlocked in a bad neighborhood and you find your home
ransacked the next day, then you are partly responsible. But, we cannot
forget that the neighborhood is “bad” in the first place because of the
criminals, not the people who don’t lock their doors.
Just because global banks can sucker the public doesn’t mean they
should, or that they cannot be judged for it. The crime ultimately
rests on those men who made the conscious effort to destroy this
country, and the blame rests with them as well. I see the attempt to
parlay the economic collapse into the lap of the American people very
often lately, especially from bankers who now claim that it’s the
American public’s fault entirely. Why? Because they will not spend
more, they will not take on more debt, they will not take on more risk,
and they will not believe hard enough in the recovery that never was.
Imagine a serial rapist behind a podium admonishing women for carrying
pepper spray. It’s eerily similar…
6. Ok, maybe the banks are causing a collapse, but to say the government is helping them is just crazy conspiracy theory…
Why is it that the Federal Reserve has never been fully audited? Why
is it that when Ron Paul tried to pass HR 1207 Federal Reserve
Transparency Bill, it was muddled in committees and then eventually
derailed? Why is it that banks like Goldman Sachs have been caught, yes
caught, setting the stage for an economic implosion in this country,
yet no government indictments have been formed to criminally prosecute
them? Why are these men still roaming free like locusts to continue
pillaging at will? Are we supposed to feel lucky that we get table
scraps like Bernie Madoff behind bars while the Federal Reserve commits
Ponzi fraud on a scale that dwarfs his?
Our government, both major parties, is owned lock stock and barrel.
This is why there are no satisfactory answers for the questions posed
above. Elements of the U.S. Government including almost every president
since 1912 have not only turned a blind eye to Globalist activities,
they have offered their full support to the bankers.
Nixon removed the Dollar from the gold standard in 1971 giving the
Fed free reign to print as much fiat as they wished without limitations.
In 1980 the Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control
Act was passed placing all banks essentially under the rules of the
Federal Reserve. The Glass-Steagall Act which kept investment banks and
depository banks separate was repealed under a Republican majority in
the Senate, and then finalized by Democratic President Bill Clinton in
1999. 30 years ago, banks that held your home mortgage were for the
most part required to keep that mortgage until it was finally paid.
But, a series of government decisions spanning that period and
influenced by global banks allowed for the “securitization” of
mortgages, leading to the creation of “derivatives”, which were then
used by corporate mobsters like Goldman Sachs to destroy our financial
system. Last, but certainly not least, both the Bush and Obama
Administrations pressured Congress into passing highly unpopular bailout
legislation which basically rewarded the same banks that created the
credit crisis with trillions in taxpayer dollars (yes, the bailouts are
now actually in the trillions, not billions). This led to the coining
of the term “too big to fail” (or “too big to jail”). Our Government
has been nothing but complicit in the banker takeover of this country.
To debate otherwise is to invite embarrassment.
I haven’t even scratched the surface of government involvement in the
collapse of our economy. Cases like the Savings and Loan crisis of the
1980’s led to serious prosecutions and jail time for more than 1100
criminal bankers, but this only caused the government to respond by
changing investigation rules to make it even more difficult to catch the
high level fraudsters in the act! Linked below is an interview between
Max Keiser and bank regulator Prof. William K Black who outlines our
government’s complicity in the breakdown of the country it is mandated
to protect:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Bf5Frx1lZk
Elites destroy cultures to make way for new philosophies; their
philosophies. Its not so much “conspiracy theory” as it is a widely
admitted methodology. Corporate globalists believe in global government
on their terms and they barely try to hide it. If someone thinks this
sounds “fantastical” then they haven’t been paying the slightest
attention. When one understands how Elites view economy, and realizes
their primary motivations, the fact that they purposely triggered a
collapse is perfectly logical. Nothing besides all out war inspires
more fear and desperation in a society than a financial upheaval. Such
elements on a mass scale allow changes in our collective psychology that
were never possible before. Most people tend to falter under such an
overwhelming threat and turn towards any authority (or fake authority)
to save them from harm. Some people scoff at this idea, but it is
likely they have never actually been in the wake of a real national
catastrophe before. Men, especially those who know little of
themselves, can change quickly in the face of calamity. The Elites
recognize this, engineer tragedy, then waltz into the aftermath to
merrily lord over the rubble.
Will their plan work? I think not, but I’m an optimist (no, really).
The pursuit of total control and total power seems rather infantile to
me, be it on an impressively psychotic level. Although, if we are made
to forget who the real enemy is, then I think they do have a chance at
success. That is how they have remained successful to this point. Only
now does the average man have such immense knowledge at his fingertips,
the knowledge to bring down a line despots and tyrants that have
reigned for centuries. If only the average man was not so easily
deterred by WMD’s (Weapons of Mass Distraction). The Elites will likely
ignite some wars, tempt us into in-fighting, and fabricate enemies like
Al Qaeda out of the ether. As the slogan goes, “Order Out Of Chaos”.
Whatever happens, our eyes must remain fixed on the root of the problem;
the bankers, and nothing else.
Globalists are not invincible, they are not untouchable, they are not
even all that brilliant. They are human, and they have made many
mistakes. The engineering of an economic meltdown really changes
nothing. Hired thugs, useful idiots, corrupt officials, even
hyperinflation, all tiny obstacles when considering the world we could
have if the Elites were finally made to face the reckoning they deserve.
Americans once took on the greatest empire on Earth. We once took a
feared king to task. Are a bunch of frothing corporate bankers really
so daunting? All that is needed is a principled movement with the will
to see justice done, and I believe we have that already.
You can contact Giordano Bruno at: giordano@neithercorp.us
- 49268 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -


LOL
Har. Har. Chortle. Chortle.
Both of you ladies are on my radar.
*snigger*
yer on mine too - your posts are often hilarious - and this female is not a lady.
You won't believe the Bible yet you'll use the Pope as a source for your argument. That's rich.
Regarding the idea that China would never dump their treasury holdings, it seems to be that at some point it would be cost effective for them to do just that. If they perceive that the US is at a tipping point it will simply be too easy to collapse the dollar and watch the US descend into chaos, which would be easier and cheaper than any kind of a military confrontation. No loss to them really as they are positioning for self sufficiency and enough export markets elsewhere to support their own economy. The irony is we are their ultimate (un)nuclear option.
Yeah, China is buying gold and dumping treasuries at a measured pace, they don't want to rock the boat but they don't want to be burned when US Treasury defaults outright or by monetization. Notice the TBT is headed back up today.
Yep.
China will continue to finance US/western hemogony... over China? Ain't gonna happen. China has the US/west by the short & curlys... China holds most of the cards already, and they are indeed collecting the remaining cards in a measured manner.
Discount/ignore the advice of anyone who doesn't recognize China for what they are - a superpower.
how to win a resource war non-violently
Both the US and China have the ability to make the USTreasuries worthless. But they woulndn't do it unless they were 100% confident that they are better positioned than the other.
And the hell with the collateral damage (you and me)
Bingo.
Its been no secret for decades that the only way to attack America is through it's fallable money and dishonest scales (leverage).
double bingo. Most empires with cool armies fail on corruption, arrogance and internal decay. "Pride goeth before the fall" - Herodotus
This is insane...there is no plan to destroy capitalism...capitalism is quite capable of destroying itself
What we are seeing now a the desperate attempts of capitalism to save itself by progressively abolishing the market.
Do not forget that the market and capitalism are different things and antagonistic.
Capitalism only wants the market for labor, and monopoly for everything else
Just ask yourself why a criminal destroys evidence...
When was the last time the finance racket was forthcoming, accountable or transparent? Hell when was the last time the industry was even accurate??
Don't come here with your ignorant socialist arguments. We'll tear you apart.
Lets just join globalists and jump into their rallies of destructions.
Not a single economy can go vertical for ever, which simply means it has it's cycles.
This cycle is bad due to our modern tech, and may even get worst, but at the end we will sort it out and start a new vertical till some other buble will pop.
Every empire trough the history was crashed after it became too big to control its self. This time is no different. One empire goes, another one comes in.
Pardon my spellings. Chrome is refusing to do the spell checking.
The ability of even small countries to develop and deliver nukes on target is putting an end to Colonialism. The US is going to get badly spanked for trying to mimic the British Empire.
Maybe the dog ate your Chrome, M. PicassoInActions, so you can blame that for your spelling when your grammar has issues that even Chrome cannot fix. BTW, did you give your first art teacher the willies?
“The older dictators fell because they could never supply their subjects with enough bread, enough circuses, enough miracles and mysteries. Nor did they possess a really effective system of mind manipulation.
Under a scientific dictatorship, education will really work – with the result that most men and women will grow up to love their servitude and will never dream of revolution. There seems to be no good reason why a thoroughly scientific dictatorship should ever be overthrown. “
- Aldous Huxley Brave New World
The con is already over.
I agree with this article, The last paragraph is a little off base as the article clearly states, The people have no political representation and one offs like Ron Paul can be commitied away hence no audit of the Fed, The new world order would fear resistance to their power grab but this is the purpose of mass immigration, They hold all the levers of power the money, the laws, the government, the army, the media, and are destroying national identity all over the world, Freedom of speech is a problem and websites like wikileaks or this one will be silenced one day, The gun laws in the US could be a problem for the elite so I expect those to be impacted as time passes, Revolutions I assume have political representations for the desired rebalance of whatever power and a global revolution is whats needed to stop the world government and I cant see that happening so bottom line everyone for oneself to survive in serfdom.
+1
America is a 200 year old failed experiment that is now be reclaimed by its rightful owners!
The death of Colonialism is real reason the developed world is going to decline. The decline of Spain, France, Britain and Holland was due to their inability to steal from the developing world anymore. The US and others displaced them. The development of modern weapons is the reason the US will decline. The US will lose the ability to project power in every situation without suffering losses. The US will now be forced to compete head-head for goods without a dominant military to call on as a trump card.
Nonsense. America's present owners are chomping at the bit to meet any fraud street scum and turn their ivy league faces into hamburger.
Yes, that is a threat.
Please. The Sheep will cue up for their moldy guvment cheese like they always have. You cannot fix stupid.
Your standard of living is going down no matter what you do.
For your sake don't confuse sheep with owners.
Many that I know in the West welcome that crash as they are more than insulated from "standard of living" vulnerability, or are prepared to cope in the least.
Not everyone lives with compound lies and fraud to survive.
Some of us are prepared for a much lower S-o-L. Some of us have no need to depend on government.
This is the difference. This is the key.
Self-sufficiency, whether individual or communal, is true freedom - true liberty.
The disintegration of federal/gov't. power is not something to fear... it is an opportunity.
I see only good things in a much lower standard of living. I have no fear. I have never been more optimistic about the restoration of a constitutional republic.
I'm glad to see I'm not the only one who "gets it."
with respect, and as someone who has lived for decades on "less" than pretty much anyone I know. . .
never, never underestimate the sociopathic technologies "they" have in store for the "masses". . . all one need do is poison the water and the air, death soon follows. . . and they've already been doing that for decades. . .
if they want you dead, you will be. . .
So, that explains why so many Indian casinos are popping up everywhere!
One thing is confusses me the most. Every1 is crying about new world order... And than what?
We always have some type of control on top of us, regardless in what structure we are in.
We already have UN ( criminal organization, but not by original design). So the Q is.. Ok we will get the new world order and that is by defualt bad? or it will depends who at the top?
The UN is controlled by those with veto power. The fact that India has been barred from equality with Britain, China or France shows the corruption and inequality of the UN. China was induced to join the UN and given veto power to agree to the partition of the Korean peninsula.
I understand that UN today is a weak and criminal but the whole idea of the UN is- The New world order, and seems that every1 pretty much is ok with that- at least to accomplish some goals before final stage.
That is if the NWO only represents 1/3 of the population.
The UN will never become a truly democratic entity that say assigns voting based on population. The UN is designed to keep the members with veto power in charge.
One can evade much of the control today by planting multiple flags; currently, taxation and seizure of assets by governments can be greatly reduced or avoided by keeping corporate structures in one country, residence in another, and financial/investment activities in a third. Playing governments against each other is one of the few ways that a sovereign individual can fight back and live a life of greater liberty. But globalists do not appreciate this at all. The last thing they want is for there to be anywhere on the planet someone can go to escape their regulation and power.
Of principle importance in any power structure is scope, and the race is on to control the entire sand box. If you think reaching that goal is going to pan out well for you, then I've never met such an incredible optimist.
brilliant.
Game over, Janet Takavoli: How to thwart the
assassins of the American dream:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/janet-tavakoli/how-to-thwart-the-assassi_b...
I think that this is not so much an "engineered" collapse, but one which is the inevitable result of the endless gaming of and skimming from a mostly non-productive financial sector enabled by legalized fraud permitted by captured governments and their so-called regulatory agencies. Here's a compilation from the writings of Charles Hugh Smith which I believe describes the true, informal conspiratorial nature of this game:
-----
The Plutocracy is not a conspiracy in the formal sense of a membership which gathers like the Bohemian Club or even an informal assemblage such as the Bilderberg Group. "Membership" is granted solely by great wealth and control of productive assets; political influence flows from that… People who control, say, $100 million or more (via family ownership or managerial position), tend to meet one another socially or to do business, and while they jockey for advantage within a group like the rest of us, they form a small class of citizens possessing virtually unimpaired political influence...
It is important to note this bias for independent agencies is founded both in our minds and in the real world; people with similar self-interests naturally band together in self-organizing networks and groups to protect those interests, and since information is power then the inner workings of various self-organizing groups are confidential as part of that self-protection…
Thus when I speak of The Plutocracy I refer not to a formal conspiracy with meetings and officers but to a self-organized Elite based on protecting their ownership of 2/3 of the productive wealth of the nation. As each acts to protect his/her wealth at the highest reaches of influence (tax shelters, tax breaks, legislative exclusions, legal rulings, etc.) then they are also acting to defend their class. Their collective self-interest is in maintaining the conceptual, legal and financial systems which enable their continued dominance of wealth and influence.
-----
I note with some dismay that even in a forum comprised mostly of people who are fully aware of the scamming machine that our financial sector has become, there are still far too many who believe that the mostly imaginary differences between two equally corrupt and captured major political parties are a reason to vote for one party over another, causing us to bounce back and forth every few years between special interest owned party #1 or #2 when, in fact, we're screwed no matter which of the major party candidates we are _allowed_ to vote for are elected.
I see it all as one big Fibo... 1300's dark ages -- low print... Renaissance the next high. Then a pullback to the 618 and Colonial Conquest -- but ideas planted in the Renainsaance took price higher into the 1770's with the first expression of a Free Republic and even classical music at its height -- this broke the previous highs. Then we get another pullback into the 1870's and the era of will to power corporatism which seems to now be pulling us back again to the 618... Each wave of humanity was always ruled by "ideas" which seemed to propagate out in a most mysterious manner, as to day at our potential break of the 618 we are like a person going thru a cataleptic awareness with all the attendant evils coming to conscious recognition. At that time it always appears so much worse than it is as the vile impulses seem so unshakable and daunting to even behold -- hence why they were so "locked up" in the sub conscious. So do we bounce off the 618 or do we blast back down thru it -- that is the question? However from a personal to collective standpoint -- a burst of awareness of darkness does indeed form a cathartic leap on many occasions -- so "to see" is very good as it would be far worse to be headlong into a 618 dump and "not" be seeing.. Many healers of the mind point out the simple act of SEEING WRONG ACTION as the primary cure needed as one goes thru a catharsis -- begging the question: does the same principle apply to the collective as well? Besides, selling a 618 pullback is so... Pedestrian...
for fear of being maligned, the author is not specific enough in naming this global elite, so here goes. what one religious/ethnic group do the following belong to?
Fed chairman and his predecessor
Treasury secretary and his predecessor
SEC chairwoman
CFTC chairman
Bank of England chairman
ECB chairman
Swiss central bank chairman
IMF chairman
majority of fed governors (85%)
Goldman Sachs chairman
Fomer NY Fed head and JPM chair Jamie Dimon
approx 15 US senators, 33 congressman, 3 supreme court justices, 16 presidential advisors
These people are Illuminati or Illuminati controlled with Jewish names. They are Lucifer worshipers. They have renounced the Jewish faith. Blaming the right people is key if there's to be any hope.
or perhaps talmudic?
Capitalism, communism, what's the difference?
It all dependes on how it starts and how it evolves?
Capitalism can be defined as "man using man."
Communisn is just the reverse.
Don Levit
The reason Jews are overrepresented in the top eschelons of finance and government is because they are overrepresented in the top eschelons of every field of intellectual endeavor. They have won twenty to fifty percent of all Nobel Prizes ever awarded.
And those aren't just Peace Prizes either, baby!
For some inexplicable (to some) reason this miniscule minority of humanity are excel wildly and are extremely disproportionately overrepresented in the fields of medicine, biology, physics, literature etc. etc.
Google it.
The reason Jews are overrepresented in the fields of finance and government is because they excel out of all proportion to their numbers in all fields of intellectual endeavor.
That's what happens in a multi-ethnic democratic meritocracy!
Rothschilds indeed! Tee HeeHee!
Now, come on, hate mongers, explain it all to us.
The reason that Jews are on top of the finance system- can be traced back to history, amid the christian and Islam religion.
According to our beloved interpretations of bibles trough the history- it was innapropriate for the christian or islamist to deal with the money. That job was specificly attribute to the jews due the religious conflict between money and faith. That's why majority of the tax collectors starting after 5th century, and majority of the finance people ( if we cna call it that) were Jews or non christains nor Islamists ( after 8 century)
Why not respond to my larger point? Jews excel disproportionately in all fields. What isn't clear about that?
They excel in the art of manipulation. Nothing more.
'Manipulation'. An interesting word given that, other than the brain, the hand (hence the word, 'manipulation') is the primary attribute distinguishing humans.
But how does that address the fact that nearly forty percent of Nobel Prizes are awarded to Jews? Do you have any conception of what that means?
If you wish to trivialize their explication of the sublimnities of nature, their development of methods and materials based on those explorations to improve the human condition and their absolutely unparalleled domination of those realms of science and research, relative to their population numbers, by calling them 'manipulation, nothing more' then your poverty of understanding or perversity of viewpoint is to be pitied.
Is that what you mean to do?
Regarding Nobel prizes and concomitant success in science and the arts, it's a simple case of disproportionate distribution of IQ; to wit, Ashkenazi Jews possess greater intelligence as a group than any other group, class or ethnicity on the face of the planet. I'm not convinced that Jews' greater IQ translates as well, however, when it comes to manipulating economic dials and levers.
Funny how Gemany was able to leap 15 years ahead of the Allies technology wise. How many of the "chosen" were designing those weapons?
If Germany was a larger country with axcess to unlimited resources they would have been unstoppable for many years. They also would have developed nukes before the Allies.
Also explain the phenominal success of post WWII Germany? Small population becomes the #1 high tech exporter of the world. How many of the "chosen" were designing those world class products?
Confusing exclusion and fraud with IQ is the height of arrogance/stupidity.
+1000
"Ashkenazi Jews possess greater intelligence as a group than any other group, class or ethnicity on the face of the planet."
Pretty sure the Asians would disagree with this racist bullshit...I love how it's okay for one group (like, say, the Ashkenazi) to claim this, while it's the most horrible thing in the world for another group (like, say, the Germans) to say the exact same things.
Stupid humans.
Nobel Prizes ...
Obama got one for fighting for peace ...
Fighting for peace is like fucking for virginity ...
I beg to differ. Ethnic networking, nepotism and supremacism play their parts too. Nobel Prize winners acquire the right to vote for other nominees, which leads one to suspect that in a near future 100% of all winners will be Jewish.
This is an interesting article:
Jewish overrepresentation at elite universities explainedhttp://theoccidentalobserver.net/tooblog/?p=2923&cpage=3#comments
Nepotism, plain and simple. Just like all other peoples, they stick together, promote each other, etc...etc...
It has nothing to do with anything else. Also, most of those "Jews" are half something else, German, Austrian, Italian, etc...so your point is basically eugenic racist bullshit. Who's the Nazi now?
oh dear francismarion, are you really arguing that "Jews" are intellectual giants, with PhD's & Nobels to prove it, and are TBTF??
'cause that shit don't fly here sunshine.
Jews were forced to use their heads to survive living among hostile majorities. They put a premium on education that made them essential players to otherwise hostile rulers. They pioneered international trade because their word was backed with gold and silver. George Washington set the tone in America when he wouldn't tolerate anti-Semitism. It turned into a big win for the USA. Of course, I make an exception in the case of my ex, a nice Jewish girl from the Catskills who never had the proper submissive attitude toward her wise and saintly master.
the reason in fact is close knit cronyism. see the recently published study of how they control admissions into Harvard for their own kind. i will not, however, deny them their good genetics.
All groups look after their members.
That doesn't explain where E-mc2 came from. Try again.
An Italian first postulated E=mc2 two years before Einstein. Einstein loved to write papers minus the footnotes crediting prior work. When working in the Patent office he regularly read applications and used the foreknowledge to aid his work. How do you say plagerism?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/1999/nov/11/rorycarroll
Come on now, don't belittle Einstein. All science is based on the work of others.
A few footnotes once in a while to credit the work of others would have been the "noble" way to do it. If you tried that kind of crap today you would be crucified. If Einstein was truly a genius he would have came up E=mc2 first. He would have also finished his work on a unified field theory.
Just because the bears are right doesn't mean every bearish article is right. This is one of them. We know that socialism doesn't work because an economy is intrinsically un-plannable. There are too many people making too many decisions with too many individual needs to be able to centrally plan prosperity. But then the flip side also doesn't work. Let's look at a few of this articles major examples:
1. Bernanke and Greenspan vs Peter Schiff, Ron Paul, etc. The author argues that since Schiff et al. knew a giant crash was coming, Bernanke et al. must have known, too. This is false. Schiff et al. saw the crash coming because they have their economic thinking straight and understand that artificial credit expansion leads to a crash. By definition, the chairman of the Fed cannot. The Fed is founded on the premise that artificial credit expansion can lead to continual growth in prosperity. No one becomes chairm of the Fed unless he believes in the Fed, much like no one gets to become pope unless he is already sold on Catholicism. Expecting the chairman of the Fed to understand bubbles and crashes is like expecting the pope to be a Lutheran. It's like how no hedge fund manager believes the Efficient Market Hypothesis. In other words, where Schiff correctly identifies nothing more than a succession of bubbles, Fed governors see creation of wealth.
2. Manipulation is different than control, and all manipulation schemes, being anti-market, end in tears. The famous London cartel of the 1960s, which manipulated the gold price then, ended by running out of gold. The current cartel is manipulating the gold price by essentially practicing runaway fractional-reserve banking, which historically ends in a bank run. Guys who run Ponzi schemes are crooks, but what the author forgets is that the guys who run them believe they can run them forever, that they'll never run out of suckers if they just manage it right.
3. Did Goldman know they were selling crap? Absolutely. But again, the author ignores that Goldman very, very nearly lost their shirts and went bankrupt because of what they did. The only reason they survived was TARP, and the fact is Congress can be an unpredictable beast. No way in 2001 did they know that the Congress of 2008 would be amenable to the idea of a $700 billion rescue package for them. The vote in the Senate was mostly along party lines; no one *knew* the Democrats would take back the Senate in 2006. And remember, the House vote failed by 12 votes the first time. The crash very nearly killed off Goldman. It did kill off Lehman and Bear Stearns.
Is there a lot of corruption out there? Absolutely. Are the American people daily fed lies about how our financial system works? Definitely. Is there a large, orchestrated conspiracy to crash the economy? No. Remember, his Ponzi collapsing wasn't part of Madoff's plan, either. What really happened is that Goldman et al., their friends at the Fed, and their friends in Washington all believed they could make themselves rich and beat the laws of economics. More accurately, they believe that the laws of economics are just a bunch of outdated, musty theories that have been superseded by the awesome power and infinite wisdom of central banking and 2000-page bills. The crash wasn't part of any plan; these crooks are scrambling to find ways to keep their wealth and their power.
I agree, plain desparation to keep the thing from crashing around your ears. Perfectly "normal" people, who have found themselves in a position of advantage and are making the most of it.
What annoys me the most is that posters always talk about this mysterious group, "the power elites", "the bankers", "the bildeberg group", but they never mention any of their names and their evidence is at best conjecture. Surely, they have social security numbers, home addresses, ship moorings etc... all it takes is a bunch of motivated conspiracy theorists and a facebook page to start knocking on their doors or on the sides of their yahts en masse. I am sure that most of them will be completely surprised that they where considered members of SPECTRE or perhaps the shock will cause their cloacking device to fail and their green scales will be exposed, make sure that your iphone is at the ready for the picture
BOTH major parties are owned and operated by global banks. This is a cold hard undeniable truth of our political system. There is no way around it. Learn it, accept it as reality, and stop trying to blame one side or the other for problems that both sides created! If you cannot do this, your view of our cultural state of affairs will always be horribly skewed and your insights on our social problems will be utterly worthless.
Thank you! Well written article, and I especially like the discussion of the "thinking" box. Even here on this site, I see arguments amongst people over sides of issues. Of course those issues have been manufactured and spoon fed to believers. I look forward to more of your writing.
We are running trough an economic maze with only 1 exit. Who will reach the exit first - is the big Q
Considering the rush toward one world government as a conspiracy is an oversimplification. The actors in this play are often not cooperating with each other, but rather are in competition. The largest power brokers in the world have long since come to the conclusion that world government and global control are INEVITABLE, the only question is how much of a role they will have in its creation. Some may even feel morally justified in their power grabs as they view themselves as a more benevolent authority than other competing players. But the great race is as much a clash of the titans in a collossal boxing match as it is any sort of cooperative effort. And just like Godzilla battling Mothra, the real losers are the screaming residents of Tokyo getting trampled under their titanic feet.
Agreed. But i still like the blue pil. Truth is good when it does nto concern us.
As predicted.....
While a lot of this article is plausible, I have a few questions.
If "the globalists" have engineered all of this,
how do they stand vis a vis China, and Russia, and Iran?
(don't forget that Iran's stock market is outperforming all others this year ....)
Those countries stand to benefit the most from the coming debacle among "western" nations, right?
But it does not appear to me that the western bankers have very much influence there.
Are they shooting themselves in the foot?
The purpose is simply power and control. The modus operandi is to herd the cattle into a few big pens that our overlords can control or corrupt. Why do our masters dither while small businesses and small banks wither away? Because there are too many variables in such a system to control...too many cats to herd. Force us all into a few big gooey "too big to fail" entities and then those entities can be controlled directly or regulated to hell.
Evil Pure and Simple by way of Fannie and Freddie.
I see the comments about how China can't dump USTs and I am reminded of Eisenhower in the 1950s when Britain, France, and Israel seized the Suez Canal. The US told them to get out "or else". Britain demanded to know what "or else" meant. At that point in time the US was the Saudi Arabia of the world, the world's largest exporter of oil. The US was also the world's largest creditor nation, holding everyone else's debt, including that of Britain. So Eisenhower told them that "or else" meant that (a) he would cut of ALL oil exports to Britain and (b) that he would dump British bonds. The Brits laughed and said that doing that would hurt the US. Eisenhower replied "Yes, it will. But it will destroy you." The British looked at their hand and folded.
Likewise, as bad as the Great Depression was in the US, it was worse in Britain. In the US, unemployment reached about 25% but in Britain it was far higher. Britain was the then imperial power, in debt, exporting its jobs to places like the US, with military bases strung around the world. Sound familiar?
The next depression (of which we are already in the leading edge) will end US hegemony and leave the US as a basket case for decades to come. China will suffer, but if China avoids a political meltdown, China will then emerge as the superpower of the 21st century. That's the tricky part for China to navigate - the depression and the political unrest it will cause. It could fail, suffer a revolution, or even fracture into smaller states. But if it holds together, China should be the world's next superpower. And being the last superpower in a world of declining resources puts a nation in a powerful position.
By the way, while most of us abhor the brutalities of US imperialism, the Chinese era will be worse. Not specifically because of China though China has been no friend of human rights, but because China will be even more willing to back and make deals with petty tyrants and thugs globally in order to guarantee access to the resources they need. Imperial brutality is not a function of how moral a people (or are not). Imperial brutality is a function of how badly the empire needs certain resources. And as resource constraints grow, that need will become very bad indeed.
the world has been ruled by spain, portugal, britain and usa but the world has never been
ruled by a non-white race and I will believe it when I see it.
Today the culture is still produced in the west and just absolutely copied to the other regions (99% of "culture" and I mean everything modern)
To rule the world you will first have to have a more advanced "culture" than the one you want to rule (spaniards vs. indians, portugeese vs. africans, british vs. africa,india, usa vs. the world)
To rule the world you have to force your language, right now its English in most parts of the world not Chinese and most Chinese do not speak English.
I PERSONALLY BELIEVE: the system will collapse and US will collapse into states
the US will have to become more self-dependend and absolutely close all benefits which it will once the dolar is worth nothing, smart semi-dictatorship must take place and people will be working for a piece of bread again, the borders must be absolutely closed and people must breed and learn inside that land....i want to see a chinese enforcing china laws in USA without first wiping out the ones with weapons and the army, which can be done but it will cost china the same pain as it does usa in afghanistan
Why would china waste their time/resources invading america? There is no gain here. We have no resources. Afghanistan has resources, so for us it makes some sense to be there in that regard. China would find nothing but bloodshed here and I highly doubt any military could survive a US insurgency, we've got more weapons than anyone.
So the US and all developed countries back only countries led by democratic governments who respect the dignity of all their people? Wow that is beyond laughable. Next you are going to tell us the US invaded Iraq to make it democratic.
That's not what he said. You should try reading his post.
So his statement below is not pot-kettle-black? I believe you need to re-read the post...
"Not specifically because of China though China has been no friend of human rights, but because China will be even more willing to back and make deals with petty tyrants and thugs globally in order to guarantee access to the resources they need. Imperial brutality is not a function of how moral a people (or are not). Imperial brutality is a function of how badly the empire needs certain resources. And as resource constraints grow, that need will become very bad indeed."
It's them and us. You cannot separate the actions of 'average Joe' from the actions of the bankers and governments. Each feeds the other. Are we 'suckers' for going along? No, but flawed ideaology is in abundant supply everywhere.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SqzUsj9E8jg
and what about reptilians?
It all goes back to crony capitalism and a contempt for the Constitution. Sound money, a free market and a regulated Congress would get us back on our feet again. Will take at least three elections to clean out the crooks and club members in Congress.
three elections and/or a revolution.
and no, i do not believe such sentiment is extreme or unjustified.
I laugh when I hear our two/one 'mainstream' political party attacking Sharron Angle and Rand Paul - labelling them as extremists. By doing so, the 'mainstream' party only reinforce/contribute to their own demise... so stupid. The average american is 1000% more radical and more extreme than TPTB/MSM want to admit. The average american can handle radical & extreme. What the average american can NOT handle anymore is the moderate, the status quo. Candidates who understand this dynamic will win. Candidates who remain within the status quo establishment will lose. Book it.
I appreciate the sentiment, I really do, but these candidates you mention are doing an excellent job of destroying themselves by inserting their feet repeatedly.
I hope both win, but with the way they're running their campaigns, I find that unlkely.
prepare to be surprised come Nov.
RP is going quite well despite the non-Kentucky GOP/Dem/MSM's relentless attempts to discredit him and his message.
And I've been to Nevada very recently... polls showing Reid ahead/competitive in that race are pure fiction. Reid is done. It won't even be close...
Mel Gibson post ????????
Globalists are not invincible, they are not untouchable, they are not even all that brilliant. They are human, and they have made many mistakes.
I have a doubt that these pople are human ...u may think tht i m crazy ...but u have to think a little bit harder....can the pyramids be really built by Human .....to rule this world like they r doing ....it requires astnishing amount of VISION ....can it be human.....we may be living in a science AGE but i think we really have to look to the distant past for some answers.....
http://www.jayweidner.com/Archons.html
Globalists are not invincible, they are not untouchable, they are not
even all that brilliant. They are human, and they have made many
mistakes.
I have a doubt that these pople are human ...u may think tht i m crazy ...but u have to think a little bit harder....can the pyramids be really built by Human .....to rule this world like they r doing ....it requires astnishing amount of VISION ....can it be human.....we may be living in a science AGE but i think we really have to look to the distant past for some answers.....
http://www.jayweidner.com/Archons.html
Is there a reason why the "Send to a Friend" is not working? I keep getting the message that I can only email 3 times per hour and to try later. The issue is that I have not emailed anything at all and still get the message.
My guess is some sort of conspiracy.
I don’t think this collapse is being engineered by any small group of individuals, and their end goal is collapse.
It’s much like George Soros destruction of the British currency, becoming a billionaire in the process.
I think there are many individuals attempting to position themselves in the same manner, not particularly caring about the destruction they leave behind as long as it benefits them. At this point they will have the security the article talks about, to be at the top of the heap.
Somehow you get to leave your morality at the door when you participate in Capitalism?
Yes, the beauty of capitalism is that it works because it does not go against human nature, unlike its rival economic systems, socialism and, especially, communism.
Are there excesses and inefficiencies in "pure" capitalism? You bet your ass there are, which is why we have regulation. Finding that fine line between regulation that protects the overall health of the economy and that which fetters the economy unneccessarily, as well as protecting the interests of the consumers, is one of the most difficult jobs of policymakers. IMO, we have swung too far to the overregulation camp.
Regardless, American capitalism can work, as it has for 200 years, but we must stop the government from clumsy interventions in the market (such as propping up the price of housing) which are distorting the economy and extending this recessionary period.
To Hell with so-called "capitalism", which is mostly just quasi-private-sector oligarchy and fascism hiding behind the thin veil of corporatism! What I want is a whole lot more Free Enterprise, which is NOT the same thing at all!
<golf clap>
Jakoye,
Modest, lucid, plausible- how did you fall in among all these misanthropes?
"Somehow you get to leave your morality at the door when you participate in Capitalism?"
I dunno, does it pay better? ;)
I thought this was going to be about an utilitarian approach to fixing the economy.
"JP Morgan, who along with other international banks has the ability to throw around massive quantities of capital wherever they please, suppresses the value of physical silver by issuing paper securities for silver that doesn’t actually exist (creating an artificially high supply), and naked short selling silver markets to drive them lower (creating the false impression of low demand)."
See, this is the logical leap that this guy and a lot of others make that I just don't buy. Perhaps the reason JP Morgan and other firms created ETFs and sometimes short the metal and other markets is because THEY WANT TO MAKE MONEY! Imagine that?!
This is the problem with conspiracy theorists: they see secret cabals and Machiavellian machinations when the explaination is often simple, human greed and desire for profit.
Thier is always some no it all SOB attacking the American for something. Then a follow-up on what China and the world must do to save the stupid American shoe box thinker.
Gotta love Globalization.
I agree with all that was written in this article. However, now that I've been living in Latin America, it seems clear that the infrastructure build-out and investment is going to key countries around the world: China, India, and Latin America are in the midst of full expansion. The credit pump machine is on full, but it will take 50 years before the markets are saturated and the people over-extend their credit to the max. These globalists aren't investing in these economies just to pull the plug when the US goes down.
If "Go West Young Man" was the dictum during the Western Expansion in the US, I say we should own South America and adopt a new motto "Go South. Take it All and Give Nothing Back." Time for the little people to pull up stakes and set up shop down south.
People are so freaked out by the illegal immigration northward. These immigrants are the last stragglers to a dying economy. By the time they settle in, they will find out that the cupboard is bare. Anyways, the exodus has already started. Street signs are in English and expats are everywhere and from every strata of the US population. Physically or internet wise, if you move down to Latin America you'll do fine. There are tons of job opportunities and you don't need to be a Latin national, often as not, to take these positions. (40% of the economy in these countries is in the underground.) A friend quoted that a smart business man in Latin America would never show any profits that would require taxation. Our gullible and honest Mickey Mouse salesman of the 30s is now a globalist Harvard MBA graduate.
I've moved my online business from eBay to MercadoLibre. It works well for local sales and immediate cash transactions. It will take years before it develops into a more dependable automated, payment exchange platform if ever. Any Spanish?
they are humans....
i beg to differ.....can the pyramids be really made by human....these people seem o have extraordinay VISION ;the way they r ruling the world.....this absolutely does not look human.....u may think i m crazy .....but u have to think harder....this generational rule and advancement of specific goals ....simply donot look human......we may be in age os science but we really have to look to the distant past for some answers.......
http://www.jayweidner.com/Archons.html
http://www.dog-obedience-training-review.com/training-a-puppy-to-walk-on-a-leash.html
I dunno guys. To me, it sounds like a bunch jibba-jabba. I'd like to see some serious concrete proof of some sort of intent, proof of who the parties involved are, and proof of conspiracy between them. Surely there has to be an e-mail or a photography or a recording or something somewhere that is truly incriminating.
To me, all this looks like theory laid over circumstantial "evidence". Kinda like Mt. St. Helens erupted when there were a bunch of geologists on it, ergo, it must have been the fault of the geologists. Maybe somebody smarter can come up with a better analogy. I need coffee
ever read a jury instruction on "circumstantial evidence?"
it's not a conspiracy IMO (such as secret cabals controlling everything), but it is happening nonetheless. you have two groups, the "thieves" and the "idealogues". the thieves are the bankers who are simply using the system that they built and corrupted to steal assets. the other group is the idealogues who use what is happening (econimic collapse), and even nudge events toward collapse to achieve power (Marxists). it's nature (in both human and the lesser animal kingdom) to pursue one's one goal of survival (however you define survival) at the expense of competition.
“What they do want, more than anything else, is social power. They want control over every living human being without question. All other concerns are secondary.” -- Giordano Bruno
This explains why the central bankers can never get enough. This relates to their worldview that they have been born to privilege as too-big-to-fail bankers, both national and international, with sole privilege to a technique that enables them to create the money they lend… and to destroy it at their discretion.
“[T]he issue and destruction of money by the money-lender is not a service, but a weapon which can be and has been used to perpetuate poverty amidst abundance, which renders individuals and nations powerless to protect themselves, and which may even be perverted to serve vast designs for the complete subjugation of the human race to tyranny, exploitation and the powers of darkness and evil.” – from a letter of “DEMAND FOR MONETARY REFORM IN ENGLAND” addressed in 1943 to English dignitaries by 32 prominent Englishmen.
The settlers to America’s shore fled an old world despotism…“not as a conqueror comes, they, the true-hearted, came…” (Felicia Hemans’ “Landing of the Pilgrim Fathers”).
It was freedom they sought and it was freedom that built the most powerful economic and social climate of human happiness in the history of the world. Central bankers have dashed these hopes, not mistakenly but deliberately. And the old world despotism has the new world by the throat.
Perhaps Paul Craig Roberts’ suggestion is now more appropriate than ever: Revolution!
I think that globalization is epidemic to the extent that the like-minded can plan/cooperate/conspire (via technology) in unprecedented ways, and at an unprecedented rate. They may be working together, and they may think that they have the ability to secure complete control, but ultimately they cannot.
If they manage to foist the catastrophe, I think that they will be surprised by how many people will emerge from the "smoke"...more than expected.
But will we have learned the lesson?
Now that's to the fcking point....thank you.
The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists”. — J. Edgar Hoover, FBI Director 1924-1972, quoted in The Elks Magazine (August 1956).
Now it's time to take my pills.
A usual the clueless ignore the obvious. US is 5% of the world population burning up over 25% of it's resources. In the age of nukes, the free ride for the useless eaters in the US is over. The elite have decide they don't want to lose everything they have so the useless eaters can stay fat dumb and happy. Time for the useless eaters to go on a starvation diet.
How difficult is this to understand????
Holy crap. I have nothing to add but to say 'great discussion'. Thanks to all for some very good thoughtful reponses. I can now say that I am now more confused than I was before...!
I think I am on the side of - "I'm not convinced that the (global group/elites) 'plan' is a concerted effort". Seems more like degradation to me. I reserve the right to change my mind at some point in the future, but for now, that's how it feels.
...whatever, I can't write as good as you guys!
They want control over every living human being without question...the Elites see financial systems as mere tools in the pursuit of a greater goal: World Government.. those men who made the conscious effort to destroy this country...Elements of the U.S. Government including almost every president since 1912 have not only turned a blind eye to Globalist activities, they have offered their full support to the bankers...Elites destroy cultures to make way for new philosophies; their philosophies. Will their plan work? Globalists are not invincible, they are not untouchable, they are not even all that brilliant. They are human...a bunch of frothing corporate bankers
If they are humans, have they been alive since 1912, or is this a membership passed down - maybe by heredity?
And if they only want power, what will that get them? How is power enjoyable - and I'm deadly serious. What will they do with the power?
And if they only want power, what will that get them? How is power enjoyable - and I'm deadly serious. What will they do with the power?
A common question amongst non-sociopaths.
How is being strung up on hooks and beaten with leather whips enjoyable?
A similar question often asked by non-masochists.
The answer to both: there's no accounting for taste. Don't worry about why, worry about whether it's acceptable behavior. In the latter, a private activity between consenting adults; in the former, the non-consensual violation of persons and their property through force or fraud. I'd say the motivations aren't necessary to understand, only the consequences.
Really, what will they do once they have absolute power? What if the new emperor ends up having dementia? Or will they rule as a team? And what about aging out of the ruling team? I like the article, I just thought it was going to answer me WHY. What if the manipulating that they're doing now is the objective, just to be fucking with us is fun for them???
Immortality ...
If we're going to start challenging the convention wisdom on globalization, then let's put Smoot-Hawley on the list. Conventional wisdom would have us believe that Smoot-Hawley turned the recession of the 1930's into a severe depression, and therefore any kind of tariffs are a big mistake. But is that the truth? If you take a closer look at Smoot-Hawley, you will discover a few interesting things:
1. Smoot-Hawley was an incredibly huge tariff increase. It essentially quadrupled the existing tariff rate. It was way too big of an increase to implement at one time, without doubt, but that doesn't mean that all tariffs are bad.
2. Tariffs were very common prior to this time, and had been used successfully by the US for over a hundred years, including many of our most economically prosperous years. In fact, from 1790 to 1909, the largest source of federal revenue came from tariffs rather than direct taxes on the US population.
3. Smoot-Hawley was a success. Immediately after its passage, domestic manufacturing activity increased and jobs were created. It was only later, after other countries began to retaliate, that the negative consequences of such a huge tariff increase became evident. These countries retaliated because of the outrageous size of this particular tariff increase. If it had been a much smaller increase, they would have taken little notice of it.
When countries trade with each other, sometimes one country thinks that it is a good idea to finance the consumption of its trading partner by loaning it money, as opposed to taking items in trade. This is a dangerous dynamic and it is the situation the US now has with China. The problem is that the US loses jobs over time because of the trade imbalance, so it cannot grow its economy sufficiently to be able to repay its debt. There are only two ways out of this. One is for the US to default, either outright or by devaluing its currency. That is the path we are now on. But the other path is to gradually disincentivize China from loaning dollars to the US and to rebuild our industrial base. This can be achieved through low, but gradually increasing tariffs which eat into China's excess profits from the imbalanced trade relationship. These tariffs will bring jobs back to the US by allowing US manufacturers to compete with cheap Chinese goods in the US marketplace. In turn, that economic growth, coupled with the reigning in of US debt, will give current holders of US bonds some much-needed reassurance about the future value of their bonds.
Just like there is no free lunch, there is no free trade. If you're not getting something of equal value in return for your trade, you're simply not doing it right. We need to question what we're getting in return from our trading relationship with China.
Great article, thanks for printing it. I'd disagree slightly on the author's point #1: it is entirely true that the economy is too complex to be controlled by a handful of individuals - thus the repeated failures of communism and other systems which attempt to supplant the market with central control. The point the author makes is not about control, but about manipulation and the extent to which it is effective. Banksters can't and won't ever control the economy, but given a vast amount of wealth and political influence they can do a great deal of damage and gain in the fallout. Collapsing a currency, or laying waste to a nation's economy, is not the same as controlling the market - the market will go on adapting to circumstances for as long as there are at least two people on earth with goods to exchange.
This whole article sounds like a bunch of snippets from ZH's top 100 most used comments. Nothing new that hasn't already been dribbled a thousand times before.
Besides the whole bullish on China BULLSHIT, I don't disagree with the opinions but please provide a solution for us misguided shits.
Okay conspiracy buffs, help me out here. Are we NWO types manipulating gold lower, or are we long? See, John Paulson, Paul Jones and George Soros among others, are long gold, and surely these boys are part of the Bilderbergs and Davos crowd. Anyway, I always see them in Davos, so they must be. So is it manipulate down, or long? Are we not all on the same page? Is that our first sign of weakness?
The more clever of you who are on to our dastardly conspiracy to collapse the world economy and take the remaining few percent we do not already control must already be aware that it is hardly a coincidence that JOHN Paulson, PAUL Jones, GEORGE Soros among others are involved, since you undoubtedly also know that if you play the Beatles White Album backwards the entire NWO/Rothschild Manifesto is revealed in the ancient language of Atlantis (the Rothschilds first major victory). What more "proof" could anybody want?
All the best,
RINGO
finally someone on zh who gets it. and so did aaron russo - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7nD7dbkkBIA
anyone who thinks that the events of this world are accidents are the same fucktards who believe in evolution and random acts of kindness....we need purposeful acts of prosecution and destruction of these sociopathic banksters....
Giordano Bruno , and not the assholes at goldman sachs, is doing the lord's work by exposing this evil....with very few exceptions like smartknowledgeu and the international forecaster very few have a clue that they are consuming far more lies than energy....
Great article, but it misses as important piece of the puzzle IMO. What order out of chaos is their plan this time. The most rational answer that I have heard is a switch from the hitherto production economy to a rationing economy. The next grand step is the creation of the cap and trade system to create a bubble out of future resources.
All the conflict and strife throughout history, all the fear and hatred, served but one purpose - to keep my master's Wheel turning. All souls were prisoners, trapped in the pointless round of existence, leading distracted, blunted lives until death returned them - always in ignorance - to the Wheel.
Some games have really interesting quotes ...
Good article, but I am far less optimistic. Why? Because the populations of earth allowed the predators-that-be to become so powerful and so dominant that the entirety of the large governments do not investigate, much less prosecute the elites and gangster-banksters who cause endless mayhem.
At this point, the only plausible solution is all-out armed revolution, and even that won't work unless the organizers are smart enough to avoid the layers of paid thugs the elites have installed, and go directly after the elites starting at the top and working down. That might work. Nothing else will.
Resources like the one you mentioned here will be very useful for me! I like to share it with all my friends and hope they will definitely like it.
virtual server hosting
windows 2008 vps hosting
mssql hosting
windows vps server
After reading the first page and a half of posts I started to feel like an effete, intellectual, homunculus.
Let's cut to the chase.
We live in a finite world with finite resources.
Can we continue to do business as usual? Business as usual is not sustainable.
Being part of the problem is going along with the status quo, being part of the solution
takes courage and commitment to do no harm.
Remember back in 2008, when the Fed exacerbated the problem in order to force Congress into voting for the first bailout?
http://market-ticker.org/cgi-mt/akcs-www?singlepost=2137691
Have you killed a banker today?