Arthur Levitt on a crusade to prove just how innocuous HFT is, first in the WSJ yesterday, now on Bloomberg. This begs the question, if it really is so wonderful, why defend it so vociferously? Which, of Arthur's conflicted interests, has pushed so hard for this PR campaign?
Contact Information:
Tips: tips [ at ] zerohedge.com
General: info [ at ] zerohedge.com
Legal: legal [ at ] zerohedge.com
Advertising: ads [ at ] zerohedge.com
Abuse/Complaints: abuse [ at ] zerohedge.com
Suggested Reading:
Make sure to read our "How To [Read/Tip Off] Zero Hedge Without Attracting The Interest Of [Human Resources/The Treasury/Black Helicopters]" Guide
It would be very wise of you to study our disclaimer, our privacy policy and our (non)policy on conflicts / full disclosure. Here's our Cookie Policy.
How to report offensive comments