Lehman

Well, it looks like Blankein, Dimon, et. al. really should have tried harder to make that meeting with the President a couple of weeks ago. It appeared as if he may have had something important to discuss. Here is a clear break down of the how much principal and prop trading adds to the top and implied bottom lines of Goldman, Morgan Stanley, JP Morgan and Bank of America.

"Separating core banking franchise from speculative activities, imposing tighter leverage requirements and examining the complicated relationships between high frequency traders and banks constitute critical steps toward ensuring our financial markets are strong and stable.

By adopting these common-sense proposals, we can go a long way toward stabilizing our economy, restoring confidence in our markets and protecting the American people from a future bailout.

America cannot afford another financial meltdown and the American people are looking to Congress to ensure that that does not happen." - Ted Kaufman

"Compared with where we were in late 2008 and early 2009, financial markets have stabilized, and the prospect of a collapse of the financial system and a second Great Depression now seems extremely remote...What is fundamentally at issue here is not “turf,” but rather how we as a nation can best ensure that we never again re-live the events of the past few years—that the legitimate public interests associated with a safe, efficient and impartial banking and financial system are well served." - Fmr Goldman Chief US Economist Bill Dudley (and current New York Fed President)

Ben Bernanke has yielded to increasing public pressure to finally disclose all the details surrounding the AIG bailout, and in a letter to Acting Comptroller General Gene Dodaro, Bernanke said he would welcome a full review of the AIG taxpayer bailout by the GAO and will make available "all records and personnel necessary to conduct this review," emphasizing that a review should give taxpayers "the most complete understanding of our decisions and actions." One wonders why stop at AIG? Why not open up the Fed to a GAO audit on all bank bailout activities undertaken in the period commencing with the GSE nationalization, and culminating with the Lehman bankruptcy. Surely that would provide an ever more "most complete" understanding of just who got what and how much taxpayer capital was put just so Wall Street could enjoy another record bonus season.

Bob Janjuah's latest in its full, unabridged and grammatically irreverent version. A must read for all non-conformists. A juicy morcel:
"The budget should be balanced, the Treasury should be filled, public debt should be reduced, the arrogance of officialdom should be tempered and controlled, and the assistance to foreign lands should be curtailed lest Rome be bankrupt. People must again learn to work, instead of living on public assistance. - Cicero, 55 BC... Brilliant....and u know how Rome got away with it for so long - they secretly reduced the silver content in the coins (aka DEBASED) more and more - until they were worthless....and then the Empire imploded, ushering in the Dark ages..."

I am so tired of the absolute nonsensical and foolish approach in regards to Banker Bonuses taken by both the Obama administration as well as the bankers themselves. Here's what is really going on and what should should be going on if we lived in a world that was dependent on telling the truth, prudent financial management, reduction of systemic risk, and if a cure to our banking system malady is genuinely being sought.

Earlier we presented a very bearish piece on Emerging Markets from UBS. Now we present a somewhat opposite view from Hermitage Capital Management, which does not share quite the bearish sentiment on EM's but rather is very bullish on "frontier" markets: Kazakhstan, Saudi Arabia, Abu Dhabi, Lebanon and Nigeria. One interesting observation from Hermitage when asked which currency to own: "The answer is none of the developed market currencies...If the supply of fiat currencies is changeable at the whim of government policy, while the supply of gold or oil is fixed by the physical limitations on new production, which would you rather own as a store of value? The answer seems pretty clear to us. You want to own the commodities because they are insulated from the actions of vote-seeking politicians and their amenable central bankers who in our view will carry on in debasing their currencies." Can we get a Gold, B#@$&*s?

Some more macro observations from Joe Saluzzi: Last "Friday's stock market was the biggest tell: when you saw an unemployment number come out like that, that tells you what an absolute joke the stock market is, and how it's a lagging indicator, not a leading indicator of what's going on... When you're in the basement you can't stay in the basement, you have to walk up the stairs to get out. We aren't walking up the stairs, we just stopped walking down the stairs... a $77 Estimate on the S&P, you are looking at a 15x forward multiple on that earnings, yet you are in an economy which is closer to the 80's which deserves a 10x P/E. Why do you give it a 15x P/E?... If California was a public corporation they would be the next Lehman Brothers: that's how bad this thing is. The government is saying 'We're not going to bail you outCalifornia.' We're they going to come out with the $9 billion that they owe?"

First Meredith Whitney, then JPM, then everyone else, and now Barclays. The firm that stole Lehman whacked its estimates of GS and MS, on expectations of a 7% decline (after a 6% increase) in equity volumes, due to a "lower ETF volume expectation as well as lower NYSE-listed volumes that benefited handsomely in 2009 from exacerbated trading volumes in highly volatile, low priced financial stocks that we expect to subside in 2010." This new assumption is making Barclays reduce EPS estimates across the board: "In short, estimates are coming down modestly driven by lower return expectations in both equities and fixed income, lower inflow expectations across both asset classes, and lower equities and futures trading volumes as well as debt and equity underwriting volumes. The downward adjustments are not large, but they do reflect the challenging comparisons that most of the companies in our coverage universe are up against in 2010following what, by all accounts, turned out to be a very strong year for capital markets companies in 2009."

With all the recent outrage over the AIG fiasco focusing on Tim Geithner, is the anger misplaced? Is the real culprit in this situation Goldman Sachs, which allegedly sold its $2.5 billion in extremely profitable AIG CDS prior to March 15, when the full disclosure of the government's measure to preserve AIG became first known; a time in which Goldman, by implication, may well have been in possession of material, non-public information?

Could the gridlock of dealing with massively underwater big banks (yes, the CRE problem is not going away on its own) be coming to an end? A report from Dow Jones indicates that things may finally be moving in the right direction: "Key members of the Senate Banking Committee are in discussions to create a special bankruptcy court for "too-big-to-fail" banks, according to people familiar with discussions on the panel." Reading between the lines, however, one can not help but be skeptical about the ultimate outcome. And is the motive just a little more sinister courtesy of various tentacles reaching deep in the legislative apparatus: is Goldman preparing to take down some more competitors in its quest to becoming the one and only go-to bank for any and every financial transaction? It worked miracles for FICC revenue post Bear and Lehman, is it time for Goldman to get a little more active in all other verticals?

"When investors are forced to sell even their less-speculative positions to make good on their loans, markets spiral lower and create a severe demand for cash. At that point, the Minsky moment has arrived." The Minsky moment is, once again, knocking on the door.

Chavez threatens speculators with military force, currency crises will go global, Af-Pak war for control of Central Asian energy, Secret negotiations on health care anti-democratic, China is #1 exporter, 'domestic extremism' (wtf!) team investigates Climategate, California request bailout.

New year window dressing was responsible for the micro yields on bill auctions pre-New Year. Or so the theory went. So why did we just have another effectively zero bill auction? And no, the Lehman scramble for risk-free parallel is oh so very inappropriate here - after all funds have to window dress their Dec. 31 2010 results... Granted, a little early. So we ask, again, who is buying stocks when real money is willing to accept zero returns to park their cash in "risk-free" equivalents. Liberty 33 - once again, the podium is all yours.

In a groundbreaking presentation to be delivered on January 11 in Shanghai, "The First Phase of US Recovery and Beyond" St. Louis Fed president and monetary policy decision-maker James Bullard has come the closest to openly refuting Ben Bernanke's claim that no asset bubbles have been created via the Fed's monetary intervention policy during the post-Lehman period. Yet, Bullard notes, there is nothing that the Fed's "blunt instrument" approach can do to pop such bubbles proactively, as "financial institutions would need to be capable of withstanding large shocks to asset prices, as well as other shocks." Of course, the implication is that the day of reckoning for "financial institutions" is merely delayed to the point where further extend and pretend policy action is impossible and the Lehman collapse reaches a systemic contagion phase. In other words, the Fed admits the current course of action it itself has set the country on, is one of self-destruction, courtesy of the fiat banking system's ultimate death spiral. Alas, the disproof of Keynes' dogma will be a Pyrrhic victory as there will be nothing left of the American financial system in its wake.