Open Market Operations

While I tremendously respect David Rosenberg, his article on Wednesday on inflation and deflation is a confusing mishmash of Keynesian ideas which are clearly wrong. But in the end, despite his struggle with concepts, he may have the market timing right.

D'oh!

My recent article, "Inflation, Deflation, or Hyperinflation?" apparently missed another weapon in the Fed's arsenal for creating quantitative easing. And it's rather ingenious.

This is the fourth and final part of my major four part series dealing with what I feel is the primary question investors must now answer: is our future to be inflation or deflation? The answer has vast implications to our investment planning and decisions for the near term, and possibly for our long term. It is a very complex question with a lot of moving parts involving economics and politics. For those of you who have stuck with me for this series, thanks!

This is Part 2 of a major four part series dealing with what I feel is the primary question investors must now answer: is our future to be inflation or deflation? The answer has vast implications to our investment planning and decisions for the near term, and possibly for our long term. It is a very complex question with a lot of moving parts involving economics and politics.

Barney Frank has released the House "offer" language on various issues to be discussed tomorrow during the House-Senate Conference Committee, which will convene at 11am in Rayburn Room 2128. While some of the items on the docket relating to Investor Protection and Executive Compensation, are largely irrelevant, Barney will also discuss such critical issues as the Fed Audit, the Fed's emergency lending power, and Foreign FX swaps. Ignoring that 80% of the S population demand an end to fed secrecy, the just released proposed language also appears to peddle exclusively to Bernanke and his Wall Street superiors, in that items under debate for the audit will not include monetary policy, and it will be America's sad fate to extinguish under a 0% interest rate, never knowing how such lunacy can have come to be, until such time as the banking system blows itself up once again. This way the American public will never know whether someone like Goldman Sachs (in addition to Jerome Kerviel) has had any influence in determining monetary policy.

Much has been said about Libor, Libor-OIS, TED spreads and other Libor-based metrics, both here and elsewhere. It is no secret that liquidity conditions in Europe are at Lehman levels when looked at from a capital preservation and counterparty risk perspective, in terms of how much money the banks there have parked with the ECB. And yet the Libor as an absolute metric is far away from its all time wide levels seen in September 2008. Bloomberg's chart of the day provides a good reason for why Libor is not only no longer relevant, but why any reading for Libor (and potentially Euribor) no longer represents the true liquidity tightness experienced by member banks. As Bloomberg notes: "Banks have all but stopped lending to each other, driving transactions in the interbank market to the lowest level since August 1994 and undermining the validity of the suite of interest rates known as Libor. “The interbank market died with Lehman Brothers,” said David Keeble, head of fixed-income strategy at Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank in London. “Libor is a strange beast, because the market that it’s based upon barely exists."

Libor keeps rising as the short-term funding situation in Europe gets worse by the day: today USD Libor hit 0.50969%, a change of 0.01281% from Friday, the first time this metric has pushed over 0.5% in about nine months. The Libor reporting dispersion among BBA member banks has actually tightened marginally from last week, with one notable outlier: UBS. Of the 15 banks that report both USD and EUR-based LIBOR, all disclose a higher offer rate for EUR Libor except for UBS! The Swiss bank is a blatant outlier, in that its disclosed EUR Libor rate of 0.4850% is in fact 10% lower than its USD Libor. Just how big are the dollar funding needs of UBS, which many see as an "open market operations" vehicle for the SNB, a bank which it is no secret is now openly intervening in FX markets, and thus likely has provided a lifeline to UBS to provide this lower EUR Libor rate compared to US Libor. So how would the circle jerk go: SNB buys EUR in the open market (causing massive destruction in the EURCHF and GBPCHF pairs), then the excess euro holdings are funneled back into the market via a much cheaper EUR lending rate in the 3M funding market (LIBOR) compared to all other banks: the UBS 3M EUR Libor rate is a whopping 30% below the average EUR Libor rate of 0.6344%, nearly double the spread from average of the next lowest EUR Libor offer, that of RBS at 0.56%.

When viewed through the lens of a common street hustler, the global central banking system reveals itself to be just that: a hustle. Learn the hustle and you have a chance at profit. Ignore it, and you will lose.

On a variety of Senatorial hearing, Jon Kyl was a very vocal opponent of the Fed and the secrecy embedded in the system. Which is why we were pretty amused, if not surprised, by his recent vote against the Vitter amendment. Here is his explanation. We hope you buy it more than us. We also hope you enjoy this the next time Mr. Kyl theatrically crucifies Bernanke for daring to operate blatantly on behalf of bankers, but at least without a shade of hypocrisy. "The second amendment was offered by Senator David Vitter and largely tracked the original version of the amendment that Senator Sanders had offered. It would have permitted the GAO to probe the Fed's monetary deliberations, and it was rejected on a lopsided vote of 37 to 62. I voted against it. In addition to the concern noted above about injecting political considerations into monetary policy decision-making, I am concerned that a GAO audit of the Fed's open market operations could end up costing taxpayers billions by giving investors a road map to the Fed's trading strategies and the securities it intends to buy. Armed with information about the securities the Fed intends to buy (that is, information gleaned from an audit), investors could acquire the securities and then sell them to the Fed at a premium."

European central bankers and politicians have been as dumb as their American counterparts ...

Once again we get confirmation that Chris Dodd is nothing but a paid manservant for his Federal Reserve masters, in addition to being a lame duck, whose last days in office are meant to do everything to allow the old-school Wall Street ways of endless secrecy and Fed bailouts to continue in perpetuity. As Ryan Grim points out "Alan Grayson and co-author Rep. Ron Paul passed legislation through the House that would allow the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to audit the Federal Reserve and, after a delay, release the information to Congress. It was a remarkable victory, with a populist coalition beating back the combined lobbying efforts of the Treasury Department, the Fed and Wall Street banks.  The Senate has been more hostile territory for the Fed audit provision. Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) opposes the Grayson-Paul version, but allowed a much more restrictive audit proposal from Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Oregon) into his bill." Why and how Dodd believes he can stand against this critical issue, that over 80% of America supports by demanding Fed transparency, is beyond any rational attempts at explanation. How he hopes to get away with it is even more mindboggling.

Even as Bank of America is preparing to restart securitization and thus provide the single greatest gift to creditors the world over, as this is merely the first step in wiping out/transferring yet more trillions in private sector debt, it has done the public a bigger favor by compiling the following list of key terms for all those lost in the current labyrinth of definitions,acronyms and euphemisms. Since following the Goldman legal plight will require a facility with some heretofore quite complex constructs, the following catalog is a must read for all financial novices.

David Rosenberg points out two important observations that go to the heart of what has been propping up the market for so long - cheap, abundant liquidity. As Rosie shows, both Money Of Zero Maturity (MZM) and M2 have now officially rolled over: "The liquidity backdrop is becoming less alluring — MZM has declined YoY for the first time in 15 years and the trend in M2 is down to a mere 1.5% from 10% when the bear market rally began in March 2009." And while Rosenberg is cautious in saying that equities are "overvalued by more than 20% on a normalized Shiller P/E ratio basis" the real stunner emerges when one considers just how mispriced the market is based on a combination of Q ratio and the CAPE index. According to economist Andrew Smithers, equities are about 50% rich currently, which should beat least a little concerning to all the electronic mountain of worry climbers.

How do YOU spell deflation (followed by runaway inflation)?