This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

A few more questions on JP Morgan and the London Whale

rcwhalen's picture




 

 “In this world, shipmates, sin that pays its way can travel freely, and without a passport; whereas Virtue, if a pauper, is stopped at all frontiers.”

 

-- MOBY DICK, Chapter IX

Herman Melville

Updated | Back in mid-May, I wrote a comment on The Institutional Risk Analytics web site, “Questions for the Fed on JP Morgan; Walker Todd on Bernanke, Ed Kane on TARP, asking a couple of basic questions about the situation at JPMorgan Chase (“JPM”). 
 
In the past many weeks since we got that funny email from JPM IR about an unscheduled conference call, media have focused on the past several months as the crucial period in the trades made by the office of the CIO.  But I have some more questions.

First, the notion that the trades which caused the losses by JPM were put on in the last six months or so seems to have been widely accepted in the media.  But is this really the case?  It has been suggested to me that the positions taken by Bruno Iksil (aka the “London whale”) go back several years. Years. 

Indeed, several JPM counterparties have told me that they believe that the initial trades that created the excessive exposures go back more than two years due to the size and other factors.  This is why the size of the positions today is so remarkable.  Today JPM is a subset of these illiquid, derivative indices, an achievement that took years to accomplish.  Years. 

Second, to the public statements made by JPM CEO Jaime Dimon that the losses were caused by a hedge strategy gone bad this year, in the past several months, is this really true? 

The traders who worked around the long book in the office of the CIO each had an allocation separate from the bank’s treasury positions.  The separate positions by Iksil were far larger than those of the other traders in the group. 
 
While JPM maintains that the positions of Iksil were a “hedge” designed to offset risk on the bank’s long book, just the opposite story is heard from people directly in the know.  Indeed, was the London credit book run by Iksil essentially a rogue operation inside the bank?  And not a hedge?     

The third question related to the first two involves the alleged hedging. Rumor has it that officials at JPM held internal discussions more than two years ago focused on whether the positions taken by Iksil should be hedged and/or reserved.  Reserved.

Specifically, I am told that the bank’s managers actually discussed taking a $2-4 billion reserve against the positions more than two years ago because of concerns about the liquidity of the OTC contracts. 

The fact is that JPM has such a large position in these OTC derivatives that in cannot unwind the position.  Thus the idea that Iksil was hedging the bank’s long book seems to be in direct conflict with reports that Iksil’s trades were seen by JPM management as a separate risk exposure that required mitigation and even a formal reserve charge.

The last issue, again, goes to the bad joke called regulation.  Is it really possible that JPM management told the Fed and Office of the Comptroller supervisory personnel not to inspect or monitor the activities of the office of the CIO?  Simply based upon the assets of the business unit, the JPM treasury operation required surveillance. 

Add in the growth in the London Whale Iksil’s trades over a period of years and it seems fair to ask why the examiners failed to see the increase in the reported exposure.  Was it reported?  Did the examiner in charge for the OCC see the growth in the CIO risk exposures?

Over five years the office of the CIO went from a Treasury and agency portfolio to one that included every flavor of corporate exposure and a growing derivatives book.  The OCC has said publicly that 90% of the CIO trades were booked in the lead bank subsidiary of JPM.  Where were the examiners??  Hello? 

And during that period Iksil put on a risk trade that has now come back to haunt JPM.  But don’t you ever believe the corporate spin that this was well intended hedging gone awry over a period of months.  If anything, the tale of Iksil and his sponsors at JPM London seems to be yet another rogue hedge fund run amok and over a period of years.  Years.  Hold that thought fellow scribes. 

That is to say, there is nothing new here save the staggering credulity of many analysts who accept the version of reality currently coming from JPM IR.  But were I working for the FBI and other federal agencies looking into the CIO area of this bank holding company, the 2010-2011 period emails related to possible reserve charges related to the liquidity of the London Whale’s trading book would be top of the want list. 

Then we ask Jamie Dimon the question, again: “When did you first know that the risk exposures of Bruno Iksil and the London credit desk were a problem?”

Final thought: Goldman Sachs was the prime broker for the CIO office.  Have a great day.

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Thu, 05/31/2012 - 05:18 | 2478560 williambanzai7
williambanzai7's picture

Exactly, it wasn't always like that. But it sure is now.

And to listen Dimons disingenuous tripe about how the regulators missed it as well is nauseating.

OCC, is that a new attraction at Coney Island. I think Shoot the Freak is more fun.

Thu, 05/31/2012 - 05:31 | 2478582 Zero Govt
Zero Govt's picture

been "missing" this huge position for 2 years according to Mr Whelan here

of course Regulators claim they're under-manned.. but if their offices had focused on a few large gambling junkies, rather than piss about harrying the small fry operators, they'd have prevented $billions going awry rather than pissing on small businesses operations which amount to mere $millions

the Regulators can't even get their priorities right, they "miss" everything that's ever gone pear-shaped, and they want more staff and more funding????

Thu, 05/31/2012 - 00:14 | 2478347 Freddie
Freddie's picture

Don't forget the Chase in JP Morgan Chase.  Aka Chase Manhattan Rockefeller.  Chase acquired JP Morgan. This is the CFR and Bilderbeger Rockefellers.

Note the close ties to the CIA with Roosevelt family CIA cronies as well.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Rockefeller

Thu, 05/31/2012 - 05:05 | 2478544 williambanzai7
williambanzai7's picture

Yes you are right. I leave the Chase off my images because it clutters up the composition.

Thu, 05/31/2012 - 06:26 | 2478616 Optimusprime
Optimusprime's picture

Salmon P. Chase, sometime Republican presidential candidate and eventually Secretary of the Treasury under the tyrant Lincoln.

Thu, 05/31/2012 - 02:45 | 2478495 CIABS
CIABS's picture

Thanks for the excellent research, Freddie.  Wikipedia is where all of the CIA's dirtiest secrets are hidden.

Thu, 05/31/2012 - 05:27 | 2478572 Zero Govt
Zero Govt's picture

the Rockerfellas are merging with the Rothchilds and it's 'interesting' to see how the press core are soft-touching the news (they're both huge charity givers according to The Telegraph, some nice scraps from the tables of extortion)

so we can look forward to what in effect will be the worlds largest Hedge Fund which the press has already billed as "wealth creation" and a huge trans-Atlantic new squid being formed and manned with the agents of capitalisms greatest enemies

anybody know of a Hedge Fund that's created wealth???

..nope, me neither

Wed, 05/30/2012 - 23:50 | 2478315 Lionhead
Lionhead's picture

WB7, admiring your work greatly. It just gets better with age. On to JPM; let's see, Bankia is done, soon to be followed by that pesky French bank. Could it be ole JPM just might be on the list for an eventual death by a thousand cuts, day after day of losses until it is finally done?

And a big Thank You to Tyler for his daily market summary after the markets close in the US. Gentlemen, I believe the "black hole" Treasury Bond Bubble of 2012 has finally been released. Mind the flows, as there will be no escape from it...

 

Thu, 05/31/2012 - 05:20 | 2478568 williambanzai7
williambanzai7's picture

Let's just assume they are so exposed to everything that any series of events that does not fit in with Central Planning is going to exact a heavy toll, magnified by all that debt and structural leverage.

Wed, 05/30/2012 - 23:36 | 2478286 Hulk
Hulk's picture

My hope is that one day Madoff has lots of company. But for now, he is one lonely SOB...

Thu, 05/31/2012 - 06:28 | 2478618 Winston Churchill
Winston Churchill's picture

Come on now.

Poor old Bernies' crime was that he ripped off the 1%.

You are only allowed to rip off the 99%.

Get with the program.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!