This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

Due to International Pressure (Or Typhoon Damage?), Tepco Agrees to Start Removing Radioactive Fuel from Fukushima a Year Early

George Washington's picture




 

 

Tepco was going to wait until late 2013 to even begin to start addressing the greatest threat to humanity.

There is some good news.

Specifically – due to international pressure – Tepco has agreed to speed up the timetable.  As Reuters notes:

Workers at the crippled Fukushima nuclear plant will begin removing fuel rods from a damaged reactors a year ahead of schedule, a government minister said Thursday, a move to address concerns about the risk of a new quake that could cause a further accident and scatter more radioactive debris.

 

***

 

“We would like to start taking out undamaged fuel this year. Preparation is now under way,” Japan’s nuclear crisis minister, Goshi Hosono, told Reuters in an interview.

 

“Doing it quickly is important. But we also have to make sure those workers out there, who are struggling under harsh conditions, will not be endangered by trying to move things fast.”

Postscript:  Of course, some theorize there is a more disturbing explanation of Tepco's willingness to move up the timeframe.  For example, Fukushima Diary and What Really Happened claim that the roof of Building 4 is now GONE - perhaps due to damage from typhoon Guchol - and that the building is in real trouble.

However, videos posted at EneNews appear to show that Tepco simply removed the roof with a crane as part of its ongoing work.

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Sun, 06/24/2012 - 09:40 | 2555438 Lmo Mutton
Lmo Mutton's picture

TEPCO

Tokyo Exponentially Poor Climate Organization

Sun, 06/24/2012 - 02:40 | 2555236 Muppet
Muppet's picture

I'm no expert but pictures like this one taken by TEPCO on June 14 of reactor unit 2 look not so good for a site reportedly in "cold shutdown"....   Doesn't look cold to me at all.

http://photo.tepco.co.jp/en/date/2012/201206-e/120614_01e.html

 

 

Sun, 06/24/2012 - 01:15 | 2555191 Jim in MN
Jim in MN's picture

I read that TEPCO had placed a steel plate over that pool, for some reason.  It would make sense to keep debris from falling in while they remove the damaged structure around it. 

The stuff doesn't just detonate at once in the air; it heats up because water is a good neutron absorber, as is graphite and other materials.  It takes a while for a 'naked' rod to get hot enough to burn even in the absence of these moderators.  I assume they are going to go for dry cask storage, but even so it's a tricky and dangerous job.  It's a LOT of rods/assemblies to move in an unconventional way.  By now you'd figure they would plan for when one falls or breaks apart in midair.........right? 

Sat, 06/23/2012 - 23:28 | 2555101 Arnold Ziffel
Arnold Ziffel's picture

I am still waiting here on the beach in Orgeon for the core of Reactor#4 to float up into the sand next to the concrete dock that washed ashore here from japan a few days ago......it will be very spectacular at night they tell me....all aglow and such....

Sat, 06/23/2012 - 22:40 | 2555040 TrainWreck1
TrainWreck1's picture

China will accept them and recycle them into luminescent puppy treats.

 

Sat, 06/23/2012 - 22:29 | 2555027 g speed
g speed's picture

i seem to recall that #4 was using a different fuel (plutonium?) than the other reactors--might this be correct? and also that #4 had a far larger quantity than the others in its spent fuel pool-- 

Sat, 06/23/2012 - 23:02 | 2555068 etudiant
etudiant's picture

Duplicate post   Sorry

Sat, 06/23/2012 - 23:00 | 2555067 etudiant
etudiant's picture

Reactor 3, which blew up spectacularly, had an experimental amount (less than 10%) of so called Mixed Oxide Fuel (MOF) containing plutonium and uranium oxyde fuel elements, It is an ongoing disaster and will not be even workable for some years.

Reactor 4 had a fresh  uranium oxyde based fuel load when it was shut down and emptied for its maintenance cycle. Fresh fuel does not yet contain the many fission products that gradually build up in spent fuel, so it is much less radioactive.

However, that spent fuel pool also contains fuel from previous cycles, which is stil more radioactive although somewhat cooled because of decay. 

The focus on the relatively minimally damaged reactor 4 spent fuel pool, which has incidentally been structurally reenforced after the earthquake and explosions is difficult to understand when there are three nuclear meltdowns smoking next door, all of which also have spent fuel pools loaded with used fuel.

Sat, 06/23/2012 - 21:19 | 2554924 SuccorMoney
SuccorMoney's picture

Doing it quickly is important. This is good news.  We in the rest of the Northern Hemisphere should offer the Japanese any and all help.  This is a really big threat, addressing it is a really big deal.

Sat, 06/23/2012 - 20:05 | 2554807 Skip
Skip's picture

GW, like you, I'm ALWAYS suspicious about ANYTHING either Tepco/Japanese government, or the US government says about this disaster, that said, I really do feel that this is the best news we have had since March 11, 2011.

Let's hope and pray and perhaps PRESSURE has been put on the Japanese and that it worked, of course your other reason that was proffered is much scarier, let's go with the INTERNATIONAL PRESSURE, at least until we know for sure.

Those Japanese were burning radioactive waste and that was CRIMINAL.

Sat, 06/23/2012 - 15:44 | 2554355 Milton Freewater
Milton Freewater's picture

I have more confidence in a van full of sheet rockers than TEPCO.

 

 

Sat, 06/23/2012 - 15:34 | 2554327 steve from virginia
steve from virginia's picture

 

Washington's blog needs better sources than Fuku Diary and Mike Rivero, how about vids, instead:

http://enenews.com/large-gap-in-top-floor-of-no-4-reactor-building-taken...

You can see for yourself the machine removing the roof struts on reactor 4.

 - Tepco needs to remove fuel from reactors 5 and 6. Nothing wrong with the fuel handling in these units.

 - Commercial operators never remove energized fuel from cores or spent fuel pools. The equipment to move it does not exist (spent fuel is left in the SFPs to cool for ten years or so then removed to a common pool or dry cask storage). Tepco is reasonably concerned about moving 'hot' fuel as a misstep would be catastrophic.

 - Military operators handle energized fuel - military reactor operators should be consulted and appropriate equipment built to handle/move the spent fuel offsite.

 - Unit 4 SFP has over 1000 tons of energized fuel, enough to turn Japan into a wasteland. It doesn't need to explode, only be exposed to the air where it will burst into radioactive flame. The outcome of this infernal fire would be a reactor complex too radioactive to approach within a mile.

Figure out for yourselves the consequences of such a fire and abandonment of thousands more tons of radioactive fuel also to burn.

 

Sun, 06/24/2012 - 01:46 | 2555211 Freddie
Sat, 06/23/2012 - 19:37 | 2554778 Stuck on Zero
Stuck on Zero's picture

Energized fuel??  What's that.  Fuel rod bundles are routine plucked out of reactors and moved over to fuel pools.  It happens every two to five years at power stations.  The spent fuel pools are storage for the rods until they can figure out what to do with them: reprocessing or deep storage.

 

Sun, 06/24/2012 - 01:05 | 2555184 bjonsson
bjonsson's picture

That's because those fuel rods are removed one by one, individually.  No chance of criticality.  If you remove an ENTIRE CORE, you get BIG problems.

Sat, 06/23/2012 - 15:39 | 2554341 HungrySeagull
HungrySeagull's picture

Which was why I suggested bringing the sun into the plant by nuking the place more than a year ago.

That was then, thinking on the hellish inferno that might happen here... I need a drink.

Basically Japan would become a place where there is no humanity or law and other Lands including areas of the USA will become too hot to enter and thus havens of no law. Only the rule of the strongest.

I get a chill every time I go by TMI, knowing a failure there will render all north east USA uninhabitable for 10 thousand years.

And I used to live and breathe targeting data versus effects.

Sun, 06/24/2012 - 01:52 | 2555214 Freddie
Freddie's picture

Basically Japan would become a place where there is no humanity or law and other Lands including areas of the USA will become too hot to enter and thus havens of no law. Only the rule of the strongest.

A lot of people voted for this in 2008 in the United States.  This is a global issue and what is more important to the f**wit? Trayvon, amnesty, gun running to the drug carels, golf and hoops.

Sun, 06/24/2012 - 00:41 | 2555169 Seize Mars
Seize Mars's picture

What are you talking about?

Sat, 06/23/2012 - 19:12 | 2554744 myne
myne's picture

I hope they have a plan B.

I hope they're drilling a very deep hole right next to the rods, below the water table. I hope they plan in a last ditch moment to let all of the fuelrods fall into that hole and to do their melty best. I hope they have the ability to funnel a giant melting pool of material into this hole and then fill it with tonnes and tonnes of concrete.

Most of all, I hope their plan A works. But having a plan B that is less than optimal, but can be performed with existing tools (oil drills) and the pin pulled fairly quickly should plan A fail, is very important.

I fear they're committing all their resources to a plan A that has every chance of going wrong.

 

Sat, 06/23/2012 - 15:37 | 2554285 slewie the pi-rat
slewie the pi-rat's picture

international pressure?  well, we write and share news and perspctives here...

the biggest difference in my life last 4 years:  my neighborhood and the food i'm eating are way more radioactive than before prez0 was elected and that fuking tsunami, too

<The Fukushima GyreSHEPHERD BLISS “Nuclear Free Zone” reads the comforting, official sign at the corner of Highway 116 and Lynch. It welcomes people coming into Sebastopol from the south. “What’s a nuclear free zone?”

this is the local consciousness starting to go:  huh? people with 8th graders and so on;  actually, physics teachers with 8th graders;  when i first read this, i wasn't sure how to present it here

it seems so naive after having slugged it out with the industry, last year on zH, in real time

but these are completely certified world-class nannies, BiCheZ!   and this is political! 

they will get to the point where they must face that fact that nobody can do squat;  that fact will not matter;  they will just start ripping off people's heads and shitting down their necks, since they will want it fixed, and fixed right, too;  especially #4, dammit!  and N0W!

if you would like to partake in this march on nukuler "reason" hit the link  <The Fukushima Gyre>    and see what you can do;  they are organized!  do not doubt the local pirate here...  sebastopol has sister cities in japan and ukraine;  if you would like to confront the shitheads in charge of the mess a fuk_u, this is the best bet, imo

don't worry about the small stuff with "agandae" here;  if you want fuk_u fixed, slewie would recommend giving these totally-ready-for-fightClub BiCheZ yer proxy ASAP!

and stay tooned...

Sun, 06/24/2012 - 01:43 | 2555209 Freddie
Freddie's picture

Hope and (radioactive) Chains

Sat, 06/23/2012 - 15:11 | 2554274 etudiant
etudiant's picture

The top of reactor 4 has been dismantled as part of the cleanup, as can be seen in photos talen during a recent visit by journalists and Minister Hosono:  http://photo.tepco.co.jp/en/date/2012/201205-e/120528-02e.html

The number 4 reactor spent fuel pool has been covered by metal plates, to allow the debris removal to continue more easily.

The focus on reactor 4, which was unloaded at the time of the disaster, is surprising to me. Right next to reactor 4 are three other reactors, all of which have melted down and are in unknown shape, but are leaking highly radioactive water and vapor.

Fixing reactor fours spent fuel pool will do precisely nothing to reduce contamination or improve safety. If spent fuel were a problem, it would be better to empty the common pool, which has more spent fuel in it than all the other reactor pools put together.

This focus on a non problem is symptomatic imho of the current wave of stupidity in government. Other illustrations are found abundantly around the world, here in the US, in Europe, in China and elsewhere. There must be a common cause, it is too widespread to just blame a few politicians.

Sat, 06/23/2012 - 16:38 | 2554454 bjonsson
bjonsson's picture

The reason for the focus on the #4 spent fuel pool is because it is the most STRUCTURALLY UNSOUND of the four reactor buildings.  The "cover" over the spent fuel pool achieves absolutely nothing if the pool itself collapses.  This would expose the equivalent of multiple cores of fuel to the open air which could potentially ignite the zirconium fuel encasing and start a radiation-emitting inferno that CAN'T be extinguished with water.

Sat, 06/23/2012 - 15:25 | 2554307 Divine Wind
Divine Wind's picture

The focus on the SFP of #4 is because the pool is filled with spent fuel, still incredibly dangerous and HOT.

Word is that at the time of the accident the pool failed, water leaked out and they started getting local criticalities.

The building is failing. If the SFP, which is over 100 feet in the air, comes tumbling down or an earthquake causes the pool to fail, the results will completely dwarf what has occurred so far.

 

Sat, 06/23/2012 - 19:34 | 2554776 Stuck on Zero
Stuck on Zero's picture

The best thing that could happen to the spent fuel pool is to have it spill its content all over the place.  Together, all the spent fuel rods are dangerous as hell.  Separated they are safe.  All the fuel at the site needs to be removed and popped into dry storage cannisters. 

 

Sat, 06/23/2012 - 22:16 | 2555012 donsluck
donsluck's picture

Unfortunatly spent fuel rods ignite (you know, catch fire) when exposed to the air for any more than a few minutes. It's time for us all to familiarize ourselves with the nuances of nuclear energy.

Sat, 06/23/2012 - 15:35 | 2554330 HungrySeagull
HungrySeagull's picture

I for one have managed to actually think about what happened to the USS Ronald Reagen CVN when she was using the wash down system that is reserved for nuclear war or related in the area. It was not long after when Stratfor reported the carrier is in unscheduled dock.

From thence to thinking about evacuating Japan as a entire operation to the loss of the West Coast and irradiating fo the USA and Europe...

I suppose we can do well enough by converting a room with lead sheets from a foundry to make a shelter or something.

Sat, 06/23/2012 - 14:59 | 2554232 williambanzai7
williambanzai7's picture

Tornado risk. You heard it here first...

TEPCO CEO

Sat, 06/23/2012 - 19:31 | 2554771 el Gallinazo
el Gallinazo's picture

Man the tornadoes!  Full speed ahead!

Sat, 06/23/2012 - 21:58 | 2554987 old naughty
old naughty's picture

Oh you mean penta-tornadoes? One for each reactor? OMG.

Sat, 06/23/2012 - 14:56 | 2554222 Urban Roman
Urban Roman's picture

A year early?

Didn't they mean to say a year late?

Sun, 06/24/2012 - 04:41 | 2555280 ThirdWorldDude
ThirdWorldDude's picture

In their eyes it doesn't really matter, since they know at least 2 out of 4 reactors are in a "China syndrome" mode...

http://enenews.com/former-japan-official-underground-rumblings-heard-in-...

Sat, 06/23/2012 - 14:46 | 2554184 Nage42
Nage42's picture

They'll be taking them down to Tokyo to be burned in an even hotter furnace and distributed as ash across all of Japan and the world so that "everyone can share the burden together," like they did with the contaminated debris earlier in the year.

It's the Japanese way.

Sat, 06/23/2012 - 14:59 | 2554230 HungrySeagull
HungrySeagull's picture

No sir. We are now at war with a creation of our own making. Nature is strong and we don't have the time to sit around for years.

We are going to lose workers, equipment etc until this thing is finished. It is my hope that this thing gets done in time and all reactors of this design are taken off line.

As far as the fuel... ship the damn things by rocket into the Sun. Or bury it in Yucca mountain or some other place.

Sat, 06/23/2012 - 22:12 | 2555006 donsluck
donsluck's picture

Are you volunteering YOUR back yard? With an agreement for neither you nor your heirs to ever sell?

Sat, 06/23/2012 - 21:54 | 2554985 old naughty
old naughty's picture

The sun consciousness says no fxxxing way.

Sat, 06/23/2012 - 14:41 | 2554170 I am Jobe
I am Jobe's picture

Just ship them to CA.

Sat, 06/23/2012 - 14:21 | 2554082 hivekiller
hivekiller's picture

So where are they removing the fuel rods to?

Sat, 06/23/2012 - 14:23 | 2554092 Divine Wind
Divine Wind's picture

Above ground (ground level) dry cask storage.

Sat, 06/23/2012 - 15:12 | 2554275 CIABS
CIABS's picture

How about Diego Garcia?  That would irradiate the safe haven areas that the elites are planning to move to.

Sat, 06/23/2012 - 14:17 | 2554070 Golden monkey
Golden monkey's picture

All of this was caused by TEPCO refusing to use sea water to cool down their installations, not a typhoon, a tsunamis, or even a prostitute in Tokyo.

Sat, 06/23/2012 - 14:22 | 2554088 Divine Wind
Divine Wind's picture

 

 

GM,

Respectfully, this is not true. We know this because tremendous amounts of radioactive Sulfur was produced.

This came from seawater being used to cool the reactors.

 

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffmcmahon/2011/08/16/wheres-that-radioactive-sulfur-now-possibly-in-your-pants/

 

 

Sun, 06/24/2012 - 01:34 | 2555206 Freddie
Freddie's picture

The place was a total mess from the tsunami and then things blew up from venting too.  They used Yakuza wino slave labor for maintenance too.  The Ukrainian sprobably maintained Chrernobyl better.

The pictures I saw recently are a total mess.  I have no idea where they can even start and neither do they.  For all the money Japan wasted on govt spending/yakuza skimming - they could have built a better breakwater.  A reactor a bit further north had a slighlty higher breakwater and had no problems.  

Sat, 06/23/2012 - 14:15 | 2554055 Divine Wind
Divine Wind's picture

 

 

This disaster scares me.

Do you believe TPTB when they tell you there is no danger from the fallout this place has ejected into the atmosphere?

Care to see what has been deposited in your area?

You can get your air filters tested for radioactive fallout (hot particles) from Fukushima completely free.

http://www.RadTest4U.com .

 

 

 

Sat, 06/23/2012 - 21:51 | 2554976 old naughty
old naughty's picture

Remain calm...It merely means we will evolve into a radioactive being.

May be we get a green-ish glow in the dark, like them.

Sat, 06/23/2012 - 14:09 | 2554038 Joebloinvestor
Joebloinvestor's picture

SPIN.

When you have to do something, make it sound like you are doing everyone a favor.

Sat, 06/23/2012 - 17:45 | 2554608 knukles
knukles's picture

What undamaged fuel rods?
Spin?

Remain Calm. 
Back to Work.

Sat, 06/23/2012 - 21:48 | 2554969 old naughty
old naughty's picture

Remain calm...we have a very long half life to go.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!