This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
MiTT THe TWiT: AMeRiCaN BoRaT...
- advertisements -
Contact Information:
Tips: tips [ at ] zerohedge.com
General: info [ at ] zerohedge.com
Legal: legal [ at ] zerohedge.com
Advertising: ads [ at ] zerohedge.com
Abuse/Complaints: abuse [ at ] zerohedge.com
Suggested Reading:
Make sure to read our "How To [Read/Tip Off] Zero Hedge Without Attracting The Interest Of [Human Resources/The Treasury/Black Helicopters]" Guide
It would be very wise of you to study our disclaimer, our privacy policy and our (non)policy on conflicts / full disclosure. Here's our Cookie Policy.
Damn right.
"And where I live or how I vote has nothing to do with it."
Yes, it actually does. Where do you live and how will you be voting?
Firstly, I think I have made it abundantly clear that I will vote for neither Obamney or Obamney.
And where I live really does have nothing to do with it because who is President effects every American irrespective of their place of residence. Moreover I carry a single passport, US, and last time I checked that is the only thing that matters.
How much is your annual income?
Is there a minimum annual income? to talk to you?
No, but there is a personal space as a matter of etiquette.
Different bloggers have different styles. Most will rarely enter the comment zone. They post and let the readers cut themselves up.
That has never been my style. If you look at my posts you will notice that I don't sit on a high horse and I am always prepared to defend what I say, simply because in my view if you are not prepared to defend something, it's not worth saying.
But more importantly, I view this form of communication as a conversation, not one way propaganda. My only wish is for everyone to keep things more or less civil.
I respect your opinion. I may disagree. But there is no need for anyone to feel ashamed of themselves. ;-)
Firstly, I will call a truce and reiiterate that I have a profound appreciation for your work.
Beyond that, I would appreciate (unless your moving to the States) if you would stick to politics in your area. If you're not voting here.... at least you could mention that in your 'art'.
You want a truce, and you have profound respect for his work - but in the same breath you question his credibility? Because he doesnt live in the US, might that not (god forbid) afford independence of opinion?
Last I checked speech was supposed to be free, so here is something for nothing - how about you concentrate more on not being an asshole, and less on prying into peoples personal space.
I am sure William can handle criticism of his work, but attacks on his character are well outside respectful discussion.
Truce ;-)
I have lived overseas many years now and on behalf of all Americans residing overseas, I would like to edify you on a few things.
I am not speaking for American billionaires living in Singapore or Switzerland.
All American citizens living outside of the borders of the US share the same obligations and rights as their fellow citizens.
Moreover, it is a fallacy to imply that Americans who happen to be residing overseas are somehow undeserving of the right to express their political views. This is particularly true since all Americans living overseas are constantly in the position of defending their country culturally and ideologically, socially and in business. This has become a very unpleasant exercise in the past decade.
The reason would surprise you. We are justifiable viewed as hypocrites. Our politicians and government representatives are constantly preaching to the rest of the world. But we obviously don't live by our own dogma.
The American emperor truly has no clothes.
I'm one of the lke 2% and definitely on your side. Keep up the fight will ya (????) just please don't give Barack the edge.... we're dying over here..... sincerely and truly. We are carefully picking our battles, help us.... PLEASE!!!!!!
I try to keep it level. Truthfully, I have more Obama shit in my image archive than Romney, although Mitt is trying very hard to even it up ;-)
I appreciate your support and participation as a reader.
Will, you're bigger than this, don't stoop to their level. You have an incredible amount of support for you're work, keep it up. Please
Thanks ;-)
I second that, you are a gift, WB, don't suffer the fools too much
I get it. Do you live in the US and will you be voting?
I ain't voting nor trading horseshit for bullshit no more!
Absolutely, but I'll take my chances with a new Jockey against a Jockey that can't seem to hope his way out of a sea of change.
Let's make something perfectly clear right up front. This is NOT about GWBush. He is history. His mistakes are history. His legacy what it is. But those who have run the nation for the last nearly four years can no longer blame GWB for anything. If we have problems in 2012, they are the problems of Obama, his Democrat cronies, the pathetic Republican Party, a frighteningly weak Supreme Court, and voter foolishness. Now, that said. . .
The American political system is, essentially, a two-party system. No third-party candidate can win in the current structure, so a vote for such a candidate is a wasted vote.
So, given this reality, we must ask whether Barack Hussein Obama or Mitt Romney is the better of the two viable candiates. Barrack Hussein Obama has proven to be a determined Left-Wing Statist. He has done nothing positive for our nation in nearly four years in office. Indeed, he has accomplished enormously negative results from some of the most ill-considered policies in the history of our nation. I have no doubt that he has accomplished more than even he and his cronies could have dreamed. In short, he has taken the nation to the brink of collapse--economic, social, political--his primary goal from the time he was student and then community organizer. It is his life's mission. The American people slowed down the collapse in 2010, but the Republicans proved to be less of a roadblock than most of us would have hoped for. Looking forward, a second Obama term, with a weak, pathetic Republican Congress, would lead to further collapse. If, Heaven forbid, the Democrats resume control of Congress as well, then the nation will in very few ways resemble the nation we inherited (in my case 55 years ago).
Mitt Romney appears to be a tool of the monied interests. Many question his business decisions and results. He led a charge for Obamacare before there ever was Obamacare. He is reputed to be worth hundreds of millions of dollars, made in the business world through all sorts of "interesting" deals. Many ZH readers are offended by his ties to Israel. He seems bellicose. What happens if he is elected as President and Congress remains divided? The Democrats likely will stop the major policy initiatives he would seek to legislate. He certainly would not be able to eliminate Obamacare. And if we elect a Republican House and Senate? Well, then the Republicans would have been given one last chance to get it right, after so many decades of getting it wrong.
So, as between two awful choices? Do you reelect the man who, in nearly four years, has done more to destroy the remaining Republic than any man since, perhaps, Abraham Lincoln (and certainly since FDR, though Johnson gave him a run for his money)? Or do we elect someone no one trusts because of what appear to be his shady business dealings, jobs "redistributions," and bellicose tone? For my money, I would lean towards Romney and a Republican House and Senate with the idea that maybe, just maybe, the politicians will for once represent the interests of the people, the States, and the nation. If they screw it up, all bets are off anyway, just as they are if Obama is reelected. Total collapse looms, unless the Republicans can somehow start, very slowly, digging out from under the pile of rubble that is left of our Republic and our economy.
Maybe, just maybe you are a wild eyed optimist and your best case scenario has all the likelihood of flying pigs watering the withering cornfields from the sky.
Let it fall already, our status quo has to fall to rubble before there is any chance of a real future again. Romney is a gutless bag of fertilizer and his record sucks as bad as Obama's does.
I dont think too much of his chances either as his main support is in areas where his party doesnt have a prayer in hell of winning anyhow. The northeastern repub establishment clearly gets its way in the primaries but they can barely elect a dog catcher in their home areas. A gun ban signing pro abortion effete Yankee twerp is not going to spark the turnout his backers are hoping for by a long shot.
What is the alternative to the current structure? Are you advocating violent revolution to bring about a new order? What order would you propose? What order likely would result? Are those in your camp prepared to deal with chaos and death on a mass scale, as we see in the streets of Syria today, in order to "let it fall already"? What will the rubble look like, and are you going to be buried in it?
No, I would think that we must do all we can to RESTORE the Republic by peaceful, political means, before we allow ourselves to risk internal annhilation.
Dude, if your going to keep using the serial killer, three-name wording for one dude you need to do it for both, otherwise people can tell your a partisan.
Willard Mitt Romney
"Dude"? Hmmmm. . .
In any case, thanks for enlightening me concerning Mitt Romney's full name. I had no idea.
Having used only his common name, do people now believe I am partisan? If so, of what Party? I would not be so quick to jump to such conclusions.
"You are" = "you're" rather than "your."
Sorry about the grammar ... I kinda slack off on the spell check sometimes. And the dude from my Cali days comes out after a few drinks!
Anyway, I noted the three name serial killer thing and thought, I'll bet this guy calls for R election results. Sure enough...
Sorry - as if the president makes any difference. Yes, people might hate Bush, and Obama - and they will hate ROmney too if he gets the nod, or elected as people seem to think.
Are so many still thinking that these people have their own agenda? They do what they are told, or they follow what the club wants. The only person who might have made a difference is RP - and they would do anything, anything at all to prevent his election.
So, Romney and Obama and Bush are all part of the great Rothschild, Jewish, one world order, totalitarian conspiracy? Was Stalin, as well? Mao? Ho? Nixon? FDR? Thatcher and Reagan? Is there no difference among any of these? I suppose Hitler and Mussolini were, as well, and their role was to lives lies from the Fascist camp, slaughter the Jews, and create the conditions for mass war so that the opposition to the conspiracy ultimately would be weakened? So, in that world, Hitler was an ally of the great conspiracy of the Jews?
What is the "club"? Who is in it? What does it want? Can you and your ilk stop it? What are you fighting for, or are you only fighting against the "club"?
Good questions, and the answers are too complex to entertain here - but yes, basically all of the people you mentioned seem to have been directed or manipulated. Hitler was most definitely used, who knows what he knew or didnt know - but we can clearly see the result and how it unfolded. Creating debt, destruction and persecuting the 'jews', so communism and the state of Israel could be formed.
Who is the club, well - there are so many theories, and I would suggest go research and draw your own conclusions - however, I'd start by following the money. In reality, at this stage of things - it doesn't matter much - the important thing is to recognize the difference between liberty and servitude - and to have the courage to stand for liberty, in whatever way.
What are we fighting for? Nothing more than the right to exist as free beings, with no ruler over us, save justice herself - embodied by laws that belong to all men, the law that we all know without being taught - that our body, our mind and anything we produce belongs to us - full stop.
Oops!
Mitt just said America has a "moral imperative" to defend Israel.
Get it, American bitchez? Your life is worthless, you must bankrupt yourself and sacrifice your body for the Jews.
And you thought the Republicans were going to offer something different from Obama.
Live and learn, people, live and learn.
Bomb Israel
Steal Your Face, so to speak.
The truth hurts.
This graphic is so profound - and simultaneously terrifying.
WB7 rises above again - way to go, man!
Just two wings of the same bird of prey owned and operated by the world's banks and the military industrial complex.
What the skull of every politician and banker looks like...
OFF WITH THEIR HEADS!
I can build a complete Guillotine in 5 minutes...
Seeing Michelle Obama play soccer with Sponge Bob Squarepants the highlight for me.
Methinks Mitt had jet lag for a polite Mormon boy like him to be so ungracious in a host country. If he had spent the past four years in Air Force One he would have had an oxygen bar, a choom room, and a Courvoisier or two to help him step out smiling.
another election another time we have to hold our noses
and vote........
survivingsurvivalism.com
The money grubbers in DC have already decided the outcome of the vote so we should all write in Ron Paul just to remind them that we're on to their game, regardless of who "wins." They can add/delete votes at will so even if no one voted they could make it look like a regular election. No way would they leave that much power to chance.
They are doing everything in their power to confuse things on the ground as well by allowing multiple voting requirements, and stupid lawsuits along ethnic lines causing mass distraction while they rob the house.
Writing in RP really is the only moral thing to do. At least I'll be able to sleep at night until they kick in my door and drag my family and I off to the FEMA camp.
I respect your position and havent made my mind up on the matter. I was thinking about writiing in Ron Paul in appreciation for his many decades educating the American people. - - But I also wonder how great of a message it would send if 90% of Americans chose not to vote in the presidential election at all. To do this as a recognition that the game, the whole process is rigged & its all a scam. To let them know that we know theyre not 'our government', and have no legitimacy. Much more evil has been done through 'democratic' government than formerly by kings . . . because people think its 'their' government who they voted in. Or think next time they can put in 'their guy' (who does the exact same thing 'the other guy' did.)
Even if 90% of the population doesn't vote, MSM will report that there were record turnouts!
Should he be in MV playing golf?
Douche kebab?
Skewer it. Skewer it good.
I always enjoy getting a laugh over those who enjoy seeing me skewer one of these assholes and then get uptight watching we skewer the other.
I am an equal opportunity skewerer and my message is a package deal. They all serve the same masters.
They're all brown nosing the same but hole and licking the same pair of hairy balls
both presidential candidates belong to church cults (mormonism and black liberation theology), both have fathers born in other countries (Minor vs. Happersett says that's a no-no), and both take foreign contributions.
what a country!
Guys like Mittens and Obongo are merely errand boys for the elite.
You need to focus further up the food chain, who do the Roths and Rocks
take their orders from?
http://pixhost.me/avaxhome/d6/81/002281d6_medium.jpeg
Who is that?
The only way people believe the answer to that question is to take a shovel and start digging for themselves.
Every hive has a queen.