This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

The Coming Unholy Alliance In Natural Gas

testosteronepit's picture




 

Wolf Richter   www.testosteronepit.com

Natural gas traded at $3.22 per million Btu (MMBtu) at the Henry Hub on Monday, a seven-month high, and a jump of 69% from its April low. Breathtaking when you think that a few months ago, the doom-and-gloomers, who’d been right for a very long time, were predicting chillingly that the price would hit zero by the fall, when storage would be full and excess production would have to be flared. But the pains for the industry are far from over.

Natural gas spot prices can spike locally due to transportation constrains and demand conditions. Earlier this year, while Japan paid $17/MMBtu, New York $12/MMBtu, and Boston $9/MMBtu, prices at the Henry Hub, which is in southern Louisiana, marched towards their decade low and dropped below $2/MMBtu [for that phenomenon, read.... The Natural Gas Massacre And The Price Spike].

Conversely, there are regions in the US where natural gas prices lag behind those at the Henry Hub. A salient example is the daily spot price at the Tennessee Gas Pipeline (TGP) Zone 4 Marcellus, a hub that serves part of the vast Marcellus formation that extends across much of Virginia, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and New York.

Drilling by horizontal fracking has been phenomenally successful in this shale formation. In Pennsylvania, production of dry natural gas in June has doubled over last year, reaching 5.7 billion cubic feet per day—9% of overall US production. But it outstripped the take-away pipeline capacity, despite new pipelines that entered service in 2011 and added 1.5 Bcf/d in capacity. As a consequence, according to Bentek Energy, over 1,000 natural gas wells in northern Pennsylvania are not yet producing natural gas because of pipeline constraints.

With production outrunning pipeline capacity and creating a local glut, spot prices have separated from those at the Henry Hub. At the TGP Zone 4 Marcellus, starting in May, prices fluctuated widely and dipped below $1/MMBtu even has prices at the Henry Hub had started their track towards $3 MMBtu.

 

Producers in that region are hurting even more than elsewhere. The 1,000 wells that have been drilled but aren’t producing and cash-flowing yet are a drag on the companies that own them. And wells that are producing have had to sell their unhedged production at a discount to already depressed prices that remain below the cost of production in most of the nation. So the natural gas massacre hits northern Pennsylvania with even greater violence.

Rig count is a good indicator of the health of the drilling industry, and also of the direction of future production—though there is a considerable lag between the number of rigs drilling for gas and actual production of gas. And the rig-count is beginning to be worrisome. At 505 rigs as of July 27, the count is down 46% from October last year, and hit the lowest level since July 1999.

Somewhere between 700 and 900 rigs might be required to maintain current production levels, given the sharp decline rates of horizontally fracked wells (up to 90% over the first 12 to 18 months). These wells will then have to be refracked, or new wells will have to be drilled to make up for the declines—at an additional cost. An eternal rat race. But the hard-hit industry is stepping away from drilling for dry natural gas; drilling at today’s prices is still a losing proposition. Those that can have switched to drilling for oil and natural-gas liquids (priced similar to oil), which are profitable. Of the natural gas rigs in operation—fewer and fewer every week—an increasing number are focused on plays that contain more liquids and less dry natural gas. It’s how producers hope to survive.

Turmoil and financial stresses may further reduce drilling activities—though it seems unthinkable that the rig count could fall even further! Record demand is eating up the remnants of the glut. Supply appears to be leveling off and will eventually follow the rig count down. If that happens during heating season, when seasonal demand skyrockets, it will be an unholy alliance. We have seen violent spikes before. And we will see them again. It’s the nature of the business.

In the great natural gas shakeout, less efficient or poorly capitalized producers may get wiped out. It’s capitalism’s creative destruction. But the price of natural gas has been below the cost of production for so long that the damage is now huge. Read.... Natural Gas: Where Endless Money Went to Die.

And Malaysia’s state-owned oil and gas company plunked down $5.5 billion for a foothold in the Canadian shale gas scene—even though the odds of securing permission to export LNG are poor, the costs of such an endeavor immense, and the timeline very long. Read.... The International Race for Energy Resources Just Got Hotter.

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Wed, 08/01/2012 - 03:36 | 2667866 ertgdg
ertgdg's picture

The Jordan 13 Shoes was developed by Hatfield and also released while February 1990. Obviously the actually retro by using Air jordan shoes is very difficult to satisfy the needs connected with fans regarding Jordan 1 Shoes or boots Brand. Air jordan shoes was going back for particule picked out and they advised the particular Bulls to yet a new supplementary NBA accomplishment. Basically alongside nothing altered as well as the elimination around the cover supra boots and shoes, as properly because jumpman had been now throughout the aspect of Jordan 60?s TWENTY Shoes Great discounts operating shoe; additionally this date 1985-2003 have been place .Of course,we also offer:Michael Kors Satchel Outlet Handbags,Michael Kors Factory,Cheap Supra Shoes, Justin Bieber Shoes,Nike Shox R4 ,Air Max 2012, Coach Outlet Online,Michael Kors Watches Outlet,Michael Kors Beford.

Tue, 07/31/2012 - 18:13 | 2666602 Lumberjack
Lumberjack's picture

HINT: Enron 

Watch what First Wind/UPC wind management is up to and who is involved... Stay tuned.

Tue, 07/31/2012 - 17:04 | 2666434 billsykes
billsykes's picture

"securing permission to export LNG are poor..."

 

I don't think so, everything in Canada is foreign owned. The gov't makes a big show sometime but they dont and never have cracked down on an entity owning public stock or anything close. 

 

Majority of oil sands ownership and profits are foreign
http://business.financialpost.com/2012/05/10/majority-of-oil-sands-owner...

http://www.newswire.ca/en/story/972231/data-from-bloomberg-reveals-that-...

http://www.canada.com/business/2035/Majority+oilsands+ownership+profits+...

http://www.afl.org/index.php/May-2011/who-owns-our-oil-sands-foreign-cor...

 

A lot of these guys don't export and spend the extra to ship it because in their own country they already have it, what they do is use that LNG as a physical hedge aginst their coal or LNG/oil assets or convert to electricity to sell into the local market if electricity prices are higer than the cost of making that electricity from coal or nat gas.

Called the crack spead when refining oil or energy arb'ing.

 

 

 

Tue, 07/31/2012 - 16:44 | 2666384 GAAPpreNixon
GAAPpreNixon's picture

You are right. But that rabbit hole is very deep. A refinery produces about 19 gallons of gasoline for every 42 gallons of crude processed. The boyz have rigged the market demand to hava a steady demand for all 42 gallons from heavy greases to VOCs. That's why, way back when, Rockefeller talked Henry Ford into using the refinery waste product (gasoline) in automobiles. Benzene (the favored fuel at the time) was out because it is carcinogenic and Edison Labs and the US navy (in a 1906 study) heavily favored ethanol (119 octane vs 93-95 gasoline) because, as long as you ran it in a high compression engine, it was EQUAL to gasolene in mileage without the crud build up in the engine (nobody knew about CO2 problems then). To this day the LIE is pushed by the oil industry and web sites like The Oil Drum that gasoline, because it has higher enthalpy than ethanol, gives better mileage and has a higher EROI (ENERGY RETURN ON ENERGY INVESTED) while real fucking conveniently leaving out the FACT that ethanol gives identical or better mileage on high compression engines with ZERO pollution, NO catalytic converter required and LESS engine wear. The prevaricating fucks at The Oil Scum are fronting for the oil boyz. Someone should remind those overeducated assholes that both gasoline and ethanol are not used to boil water in a lab; they are used as fuel, the last time I checked, to run in internal combustion engines!

And as to gas fracking and that "MINOR" problem they have with 100% of the concrete casing around the steel pipe cracking within 5 years and allowing biogenic gas to migrate up the casing and poison water aquifers, Hill & Knowlton, the very same lying bastards that brought us the Tobacco bullshit in the 1950s, is now fronting for gas fracking claiming it's "safe for the environment". Gas fracking is an obscenity.

Full background info here:

?

 

http://www.doomsteaddiner.org/forum/index.php?topic=478.msg5905#msg5905  

 

http://www.doomsteaddiner.org/forum/index.php?topic=478.msg5923#msg5923 

We have been lied to by world class con artists for over a century.

Renewables, why they work and fossil fuels NEVER DID.

 

http://www.doomsteaddiner.org/blog/2012/07/17/hope-for-a-viable-biosphere-of-renewables/

Tue, 07/31/2012 - 14:18 | 2665752 brokenspoke
brokenspoke's picture

Just give somone like ObamaGas/JPM a 50 year monopoly to build infrastructure for re fueling stations with a 12% return on investment and I bet we would have a new booming economy with in 2 years.

Tue, 07/31/2012 - 16:58 | 2666419 Widowmaker
Widowmaker's picture

This sounds like the HOPE setting is on 11. 

Too bad the common good is fucking dead with Uncle sam's boot on it's throat and big money paying for your oppression..

Face the music, fixing this mess and solutions are just not profitable for the faggots in charge.

If you ain't big and incronyiated you can go fuck yourself!

Tue, 07/31/2012 - 18:25 | 2666630 11b40
11b40's picture

In the 70's, after the OPEC oil shock and rationing in America, the solar business started taking off.  Solar hot water heaters were becoming pretty common. Insulation, weatherstripping, and a whole host of other products were beginning to have an affect on energy consumption. 

This was driven in large part by tax credits and government support of these new industries, with a goal of energy independence.

About 15 minutes after Reagan was elected in 1980, all the tax credits were phased out and the whole energy independence concept was quietly put back in the box.  It was somewhat like the Bush adminstration telling us to go shopping while we cut taxes and fought 2 wars off the books.  Just think how far along we may be if we had continued on a serious National policy of energy effeciency. 

Deliberatly bankrupting America?  Decide for yourself, but I know this country has been sold down the river.  I have been paying too much attention for far too long to be fooled.  Not that I can do much about it, but make no mistake...TPTB have zero allegience to any particular country, only to mammon.

Tue, 07/31/2012 - 14:18 | 2665751 bankruptcylawyer
bankruptcylawyer's picture

venezuala oil sector to partner with argentina and brazil??

http://www.bernama.com/bernama/v6/newsworld.php?id=684339

 

all i'm saying is that the russians hsould be helping argentina get the falklands back. if they don't they're dumb. it's a smart move for them to instigate shit. it works on so many levels. the spanish are broke. they cannot do shit about ypf nationalization, the next big thing is for china and russia to help nuetralize british oil company dominion off argenitine coast. 

submarine warfare anyone!?

Tue, 07/31/2012 - 13:54 | 2665667 wagthetails
wagthetails's picture

So rig count is down, but there at 1,000 rigs standing by not producing as of yet?  So basically we are finding the floor, around $3, but those 1000 rigs will put in a ceiling.  alhouthg pipeline contraints should mean the ceiling won't be in play for a few years.   

Tue, 07/31/2012 - 12:58 | 2665455 disabledvet
disabledvet's picture

I imagine the floor traders who have to trade this stuff for a living are very good at what they do.

Tue, 07/31/2012 - 12:25 | 2665389 Catullus
Catullus's picture

Prompt month is up 69%. September 2012 contract is up 25%.

Stop posting this garbage, ZH. It's QC time for the contributors.

Tue, 07/31/2012 - 12:59 | 2665459 DavosSherman
DavosSherman's picture

I'd be happy to see a Kotex and Testosterone warning on RSS feeds.

Tue, 07/31/2012 - 12:08 | 2665340 NotApplicable
NotApplicable's picture

I'd say I find it strange to see production outracing pipeline capacity to such a degree, but then, all I have to do is to think about the word malinvestment, and recognize it's ultimate source, Benron.

Tue, 07/31/2012 - 11:49 | 2665274 Ghordius
Ghordius's picture

I really, really don't understand. 10-15 years ago I was so sure that by now half of the US truck fleet would be on natgas. I'm clueless why this is not happening and I would seriously appreciate a hint...

Tue, 07/31/2012 - 17:06 | 2666439 AlmostEven
AlmostEven's picture

Been watching a lot of Canadian Business TV the past few years. Seen several reports of large truck manufacturers increasing production of natgas rigs. Also, UPS supposedly has installed natgas filling stations to service their routes around SoCal to Utah. Also, Encana announced a plan to install natgas service stations along a few major highways in Canada...not sure how far they've progressed on that project. Sorry, doing this quickly from memory...no links.

Tue, 07/31/2012 - 13:53 | 2665662 Winston of Oceania
Winston of Oceania's picture

Compression of the gas, we have little capacity in this department. Takes a lot of energy to compress it, maybe that would be a good use of windmills...

Tue, 07/31/2012 - 13:14 | 2665523 falak pema
falak pema's picture

Infrastructure cost, low btu/m3; LPG/NGL is a better option for truck rather than compressed NG. USA should have gone deep into Coal to liquid fuels as of 1982, when they stopped. It would have created the basis of a syn fuels industry like Sasol did in S.Africa. Gas is best for electric power generation and petrochemicals. 

 

Tue, 07/31/2012 - 13:00 | 2665470 eddiebe
eddiebe's picture

Manipulation of the markets and political will is what is keeping nat gas from being utilized as transportation fuel. It will be used for that purpose when the big boyz say it gets used, if ever.

Tue, 07/31/2012 - 12:37 | 2665417 Bloodstock
Bloodstock's picture

Because the glo-bull-ist game is to continue the wealth transfer via the more expensive products such as oil. Whatever doesn't make sense to you, probably makes cents to them. They are dirty rotten bastards, that's why.

Tue, 07/31/2012 - 12:36 | 2665402 ChanceIs
ChanceIs's picture

You just don't get it.

It might have started with Bush Sr, but it accelerated under Clinton.  The US is selling itself to the Chinese.  It might have something to do with the Bilderburg Group or all of that other world government conspiracy.  But consider this:

1) the Chinese are buying all of the oil worldwide,

2) The Chinese are selling US Treasuries,

3) The Chinese have a vast supply of rare earth materials - I will concede a large lithium supply in Chile,

4) The Chinese are building all of the solar panels,

5) The Chinese are building all of the windmills, etc, etc, etc

Now to my real point,

The US postal service - yes that postal service - is commited to building an all electric/battery storage automotive fleet.  I am saying this with a straight face.  I have attended Congressional hearings where postal representatives state that they can use the batteries to balance/stabilize the electricity grid.  This stabilization is only needed during the day when the vehicles are disconnected of course.

So you see, if we had been smart and gone to NG, then we wouldn't have inflicted damage upon ourselves at the rate required of our Chinese overlords and we wouldn't have been strengthening the Chinese economy with our purchases of their rare earths.  Does it make sense now?  It is all about enslaving the US to the Chinese.

There might actually be a silver lining for the post office.  As it implodes this week, they might be able to sell the postal car batteries to the Indians who are currently experiencing a blackout of 600 million people.  The Indians are smart.  They will charge the batteries at night and leave them connected to the grid during the day to power things other than antediluvian postal trucks.  I mean - what does the USPS do besides deliver junk mail.  The Indians probably never had junk mail.  Probably started life with eMail and never knew the old ways.

 

Tue, 07/31/2012 - 17:15 | 2666469 AlmostEven
AlmostEven's picture

Here's another way to look at the process:

1. The US govt sells govt debt to China that becomes worth less every year the Chinese hold it. US citizens buy manufactured goods from China with US dollars that are worth less every year the Chinese hold on to them.

2. The US govt takes the money from the Chinese and builds military bases and ships that surround China and Russia.

3. The Chinese desperately want out of this trap, but neither the US nor Canada will let them exchange those US dollars for oil or other resources in North America (look at how the current Chinese attempt to buy Nexen is now stalled). So the Chinese buy gold and silver from wherever they can and buy other resources from South America and Africa.

On paper, the Chinese own the US. In reality, what they'll collect on those IOUs is probably a lot less than they thought they would collect.

Tue, 07/31/2012 - 17:24 | 2666485 AlmostEven
AlmostEven's picture

Also, "freeing" Libya was an excercise in undermining China's attempt to buy and control one of the world's largest sources of light, sweet crude. And "freeing" Syria has the added (or primary) benefit to the US of forcing a Russian naval base to close down in that country. To a large extent, the Chinese (unintentionally) are funding these US military adventures in this oil-rich area. What's the over/under on how long we allow Brazil to deal resources directly to China?

Tue, 07/31/2012 - 12:56 | 2665449 cbxer55
cbxer55's picture

Don't worry bout the USPS. Do you really believe the U.S. Govenrment would let them go Tango Uniform before a presidential election?

Not going to happen, another bailout coming right up. More can-kicking, the #1 olympic sport. 

Tue, 07/31/2012 - 12:04 | 2665319 DoChenRollingBearing
DoChenRollingBearing's picture

I am baffled as well, Ghordius.

In Lima, Peru, a large segment of the taxi fleet runs on compressed NatGas, these would be small cars.  Running on NatGas is cheaper than gasoline my in-laws tell me.

It does seem indeed that certain segments of the US fleets (municipal fleets, the large truck fleet (at least the ones driving on our Interstates) and other low-hanging fruit) would be obvious candidates for switching to NatGas.

I guess  the problem is no one wants to pay for the infrastructure (putting NatGas at the gas stations).  But, they overcame that problem in PERU!

 

Tue, 07/31/2012 - 12:00 | 2665301 cbxer55
cbxer55's picture

Infrastructure. You cannot just pull into any Flying J, or Loves, and get natural gas. And the cost of doing that all the way across the country, from the east coast to the west, would be high to say the least. Oil is still the best energy deliverer out there, and until that gets scarce, it's highy unlikely we'll see natural gas take over to any degree. 

Tue, 07/31/2012 - 16:32 | 2666329 Bicycle Repairman
Bicycle Repairman's picture

I have a natural gas pipeline right to my house.  Infrastructure is NOT a problem.

Tue, 07/31/2012 - 12:05 | 2665326 NotApplicable
NotApplicable's picture

Don't worry, local governments are getting sucked into the infrastructure game, buying a handful of natgas vehicles in order to get some Uncle Sugar money and get their name in the news for being progressively green.

My guess is they'll get fully invested in the system just about the time we pass the production cliff.

Tue, 07/31/2012 - 12:44 | 2665429 Manthong
Manthong's picture

hint..

Serious progress in any domestic fossil fuel effort diminishes the mandate to protect the global free flow of oil at market prices… and the type of military it takes to do so.. and the political impositions required.., and the primacy of the petrodollar..  and the control by the elite of the issues and the farm.

Tue, 07/31/2012 - 14:56 | 2665898 boogerbently
boogerbently's picture

1) The oil industry rules the country (and congress).

2) Infrastructure would be built if Nat Gas were profitable.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!