The 2nd one especially, a total gem, I laughed out loud for half a minute ... Mr William Banzai take note, you have a worthy rival!
From an Israeli news source, no less ... fake photo versions of Netanyahu's ridiculous appearance at the UN podium
Bibi Netanyahu, who was mysteriously and suddenly elevated out of the furniture business, by his CFR contacts he made at school in America, into a meteorically-rising political star who became Prime Minister of Israel
His appearance with that cartoon bomb drawing at the UN, showed that you can take the furniture salesman out of the store
But he still always has his laugh-inducing sales pitch handy ...
Yeah, seriously. Everybody be nice to the Iranians -- all they want to do is commit a second Holocaust, wipe a democratic nation off the map, all while funding Hamas and Hezbollah and the al-Qaeda-linked rebels in Syria while repressing their own people with a backward and barbaric theocratic regime!
So, yeah, speaking out against that is "hate speech"! Self-defense is racism!
Oh, and by the way in case anyone hasn't seen this recent incident in Manhattan:
Oh my god....oh my god.....oh my god, I've somehow managed to hurt the delicate feelings of a Quisling from Scandinavia.
Exactly what are they putting in the water over there to turn a culture derived from Viking Warriors into pantywaisted liberals that prance up and down at a bondage event on the streets of San Fran-sicko.
Quisling over here is the equivalent of a prison bitch, and in your case it means Nazi bitch.
Yeah, why should we have wasted American lives defending some little yellow people? Who cares if the commies killed millions in SouthEast Asia. That's what commies do. So yeah, we should have stayed home.
The real crime was that we didn't try to win. Just like Korea. Rome had the right idea when they destroyed Carthage forever.
We should not be sticking our nose into the affairs of others. Israel and Iran wanna duke it out, fine. Why the flying fuck it it any of our business? What makes this conflict any more or less important than the Insurgency in the Maghreb (2002–present)? Cambodian–Thai border dispute (2008)? South Sudan–Sudan border conflict (2012)? Tuareg rebellion (2012)? Sudanese nomadic conflicts (2012)? On and on and fucking on.
You can't force people or nations to change, ever. Guns, bombs, and force can produce only compliance. The only thing you can to is be the change you'd like to see in others, and stand as a shining example that there is real hope for something better. The US, once the shining beacon of freedom to the world lost in the darkness of tyranny using the tools of tyrants to force compliance. Makes me sick to know what has been done in my name.
Missing Link- I expect to see you at the recruiting station tomorrow 9 am sharp... or are you just another armchair neocon/zionist pig drawing up enemies of Israel where our kids can go and get killed or maimed for life... in some circles they might even call you a traitor, and traitors get the noose
Also, as for calling me a traitor -- Sorry, bro, you don't get to decide what constitutes treason. You don't make our foreign policy, and you and I don't get to use the word on people just because we disagree with their politics.
You shouldn't say things like that. Last time a friend made that taunt, I said, "Fine, I'll show up at the recruiting station if you show up too. We'll sign up together. Here's the address of the recruiting station, and here's the time to meet me."
Needless to say, he backed out.
... I won't do the same with you since you'd obviously never sign up.
Can't speak for the person above, but it sounds to me like he/she has no reason to sign up because he/she is against the cause in the first place. So hitching your commitment to someone who opposes the cause is a fools errand.
All that aside, whattsa matter, not enough courage to sign up on your own?
The UN has been screwing around with this obnoxious idots ideas for over a decade. We have some nutcase jihadi (who will never put his on the line for anyone) asking for international blasphemy laws mandated by the United Nations...and using the right guaranteed by our country' values and laws of FREE SPEECH to do it.
Doesn't anyone at least see the irony/hypocrisy here?
ML is right to be concerned. Do I like it when my religion and my God is blasphemed by imbecilic atheists? No, I don't. But we don't throw them in jail or bullwhip them in the square when they do it either.
Where are the great synagogues or churches in a much more permissable society, say like, Saudi Arabia? Somebody want to point them out to me?
And if Saudi Arabia had those churches/synagogues, what then? Religion is just as much of a control mechanism as is the state. Why get all bent outta shape because someone blasphemed? Someone of your ZH stature HAS to see the divide and conquer technique at work here.
As for the proposed laws, stupid is as stupid does.
"And if Saudi Arabia had those churches/synagogues, what then?"
The point is, they don't. Don't you think that a wee bit totalitarian?
"Religion is just as much of a control mechanism as is the state."
Where I come from the preachers, pastors, rabbi's and priests don't patrol the streets armed or impose the jizyah on me. Its a little different when force is applied and not voluntary.
"Why get all bent outta shape because someone blasphemed?"
That was and has been my point all along. Anyone can be offended, its the actions that you take to address the offense that matter. Men of good will don't leap toward the state to redress every slight or greivance. They don't instantly say we should ban this or that.
"Someone of your ZH stature HAS to see the divide and conquer technique at work here."
I do, from many many different angles.
"As for the proposed laws, stupid is as stupid does."
The United Nations should be disbanded. It is my opinion it is the largest, singularly the most dangerous threat to our liberty on the face of the planet.
I agree with that quote, and I would generalize it further.
There is always perpetual war ... It is only when the dynamic equilibria of the forms and forces of lies and robbery get sufficiently out of balance that the obvious shooting starts. That situation then selects for those who are the most criminal to prevail.
The big problem with history is that, before weapons of mass destruction, some people could end up winning wars, and those people control our civilization NOW ... However, nothing in that history prepared those people, or anybody else, for weapons of mass destruction. Which means we are being herded into a stampede towards wars that will become CRIMES on a scale that is beyond our current imagination, such that nothing else we valued before will be worth that, since almost everything else we valued, and might have thought was worth fighting for, will be destroyed by weapons of mass destruction that are trillions of times bigger than the people that built and will use them!
The vast majority of people appear to have the same mathemagical view of weapons of mass destruction as they do about the economic system. It is hard to imagine how we can learn that those weapons are orders of magnitude more powerful than we are, and will destroy everything we care about, or thought was worth fighting over, when our obsolete social habits and pyschological attitudes drive us to start using them. Those amongst us that are the most wealthy and powerful, the group of trillionaire mass murders, are the ones that won the most from past wars, and are most eager to get another one going, BUT, they are also the people with the least realistic understanding of what they will be doing, and how far, far, far out of control, and beyond them, the war that they are deliberately starting, could go!!!
Otto, a greenie on ya, especially from the guy who "fought" in the Spanish Civil War (we'll be seein' if that heart continues) as well as the one who "liberated Paris" w/SLAM.
But, and I do need to bring this up, we have:
"War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse. The person who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself."
WB7: c'mon:
you are actually going with the MSM story? On this?
dang
- Ned
For me news means total media universe. MSM means MSM and blogosphere means blogosphere.
You're right WB7 -
It's even better with a laugh track:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-KBsCxLq41I&feature=player_embedded#!
Thanks for all you do...
no shit. Dr. Achmadinijad is a pretty honest human being... he doesn't deserve to be treated that way.
This was a real surprise:
Israeli leaders meet Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in NYC
Link:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=bCw-oWp1wf8
http://www.ynet.co.il/PicServer3/2012/09/27/4184947/4184872092095408258no.jpg
http://www.ynet.co.il/PicServer3/2012/09/27/4185015/41850030100098408316no.jpg
http://www.ynet.co.il/PicServer3/2012/09/27/4185050/418504701000100408322no.jpg
Thank you, those are totally friggin' hilarious!
The 2nd one especially, a total gem, I laughed out loud for half a minute ... Mr William Banzai take note, you have a worthy rival!
From an Israeli news source, no less ... fake photo versions of Netanyahu's ridiculous appearance at the UN podium
Bibi Netanyahu, who was mysteriously and suddenly elevated out of the furniture business, by his CFR contacts he made at school in America, into a meteorically-rising political star who became Prime Minister of Israel
His appearance with that cartoon bomb drawing at the UN, showed that you can take the furniture salesman out of the store
But he still always has his laugh-inducing sales pitch handy ...
Someone is telling these people to use shitty charts.
I haven't seen no teleprompterz. Can this guy actually say a sentence? - Ned
tavistock has been studying old ross perot videos perhaps?
Nice font on the "Public Enemy" one.
Culturally, we are still fighting the Crusades (both sides); we just have different labels.
I believe that hand gun was a grafitti in the US embassy in Tehran.
Yeah, seriously. Everybody be nice to the Iranians -- all they want to do is commit a second Holocaust, wipe a democratic nation off the map, all while funding Hamas and Hezbollah and the al-Qaeda-linked rebels in Syria while repressing their own people with a backward and barbaric theocratic regime!
So, yeah, speaking out against that is "hate speech"! Self-defense is racism!
Oh, and by the way in case anyone hasn't seen this recent incident in Manhattan:
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=fdd_1348609873
Any WMD sightings in Iran? I expect reports of WMD trailers any day now.
Missing_Link
I think you are projecting your subhuman mindset onto others. You're not human, dude.
Man appears to be the missing link between anthropoid apes and human beings.— Konrad Lorenz
Yes, learning at the knee of one who gazes on with amazement at the ass of a goose certainly qualifies as an enlightened approach to human nature.
I've claerly entered bizzaro world.
You said 'democratic' so you couldn't be referring to Israel - I'm trying to figure out which democracy Iran has threatened recently.
.............
.............
Strange, can't think of one.
You should change your name to 'missing cells' (grey one's)
"Ain't no VC ever called me a N*****."-Muhammad Ali
Of course not, he never made it to Vietnam to find out.
chickenhawk-how many of the 60K US dead would have made it to that worthless hellhole without the draft?
Oh my god....oh my god.....oh my god, I've somehow managed to hurt the delicate feelings of a Quisling from Scandinavia.
Exactly what are they putting in the water over there to turn a culture derived from Viking Warriors into pantywaisted liberals that prance up and down at a bondage event on the streets of San Fran-sicko.
Quisling over here is the equivalent of a prison bitch, and in your case it means Nazi bitch.
And please don't respond with your very own Leave Britney Alone.
Name change required.
Pure Asshole
But hang on, I'm insulting assholes.
dp
a dirty job and you are compelled to do it. - Ned
saying 'no' to that bullshit war was absolutely the right thing to do.
Yeah, why should we have wasted American lives defending some little yellow people? Who cares if the commies killed millions in SouthEast Asia. That's what commies do. So yeah, we should have stayed home.
The real crime was that we didn't try to win. Just like Korea. Rome had the right idea when they destroyed Carthage forever.
guess we needed to destroy the country to save it then. /s
Anywho, VC was a pejorative term used by the Pentagon to describe communist rebels in the south.
So here we have someone using racist language to declare that the other guy would never use racist language, go figure.
And there ya go...quite the compelling bunch of freaks on this one.
We should not be sticking our nose into the affairs of others. Israel and Iran wanna duke it out, fine. Why the flying fuck it it any of our business? What makes this conflict any more or less important than the Insurgency in the Maghreb (2002–present)? Cambodian–Thai border dispute (2008)? South Sudan–Sudan border conflict (2012)? Tuareg rebellion (2012)? Sudanese nomadic conflicts (2012)? On and on and fucking on.
You can't force people or nations to change, ever. Guns, bombs, and force can produce only compliance. The only thing you can to is be the change you'd like to see in others, and stand as a shining example that there is real hope for something better. The US, once the shining beacon of freedom to the world lost in the darkness of tyranny using the tools of tyrants to force compliance. Makes me sick to know what has been done in my name.
Missing Link- I expect to see you at the recruiting station tomorrow 9 am sharp... or are you just another armchair neocon/zionist pig drawing up enemies of Israel where our kids can go and get killed or maimed for life... in some circles they might even call you a traitor, and traitors get the noose
Also, as for calling me a traitor -- Sorry, bro, you don't get to decide what constitutes treason. You don't make our foreign policy, and you and I don't get to use the word on people just because we disagree with their politics.
dual nationals in high level gov jobs? the very defininition of treason. only one group in the US has that right... israelis.
You shouldn't say things like that. Last time a friend made that taunt, I said, "Fine, I'll show up at the recruiting station if you show up too. We'll sign up together. Here's the address of the recruiting station, and here's the time to meet me."
Needless to say, he backed out.
... I won't do the same with you since you'd obviously never sign up.
Can't speak for the person above, but it sounds to me like he/she has no reason to sign up because he/she is against the cause in the first place. So hitching your commitment to someone who opposes the cause is a fools errand.
All that aside, whattsa matter, not enough courage to sign up on your own?
Sorry pal, this time around they'll have to try much harder than mere fear mongering with cartoon FWMDs and evil doer propaganda campaigns.
I have no great love for of the Nutty One or Bibi for that matter.
Is that Oh-bummer wearing an Ahmadinezhad's mask in the public enemy pic?
No, it's Panetta
Makes even more sense.. They'really trying their best, err worst..
Are you serious?
'Cause if so, I'd be happy to drive you to the recruiting station. Better yet, become a mercenary & save us the tax bill.
You first, ML.
Did you even watch the clip presented?
The UN has been screwing around with this obnoxious idots ideas for over a decade. We have some nutcase jihadi (who will never put his on the line for anyone) asking for international blasphemy laws mandated by the United Nations...and using the right guaranteed by our country' values and laws of FREE SPEECH to do it.
Doesn't anyone at least see the irony/hypocrisy here?
ML is right to be concerned. Do I like it when my religion and my God is blasphemed by imbecilic atheists? No, I don't. But we don't throw them in jail or bullwhip them in the square when they do it either.
Where are the great synagogues or churches in a much more permissable society, say like, Saudi Arabia? Somebody want to point them out to me?
And if Saudi Arabia had those churches/synagogues, what then? Religion is just as much of a control mechanism as is the state. Why get all bent outta shape because someone blasphemed? Someone of your ZH stature HAS to see the divide and conquer technique at work here.
As for the proposed laws, stupid is as stupid does.
"And if Saudi Arabia had those churches/synagogues, what then?"
The point is, they don't. Don't you think that a wee bit totalitarian?
"Religion is just as much of a control mechanism as is the state."
Where I come from the preachers, pastors, rabbi's and priests don't patrol the streets armed or impose the jizyah on me. Its a little different when force is applied and not voluntary.
"Why get all bent outta shape because someone blasphemed?"
That was and has been my point all along. Anyone can be offended, its the actions that you take to address the offense that matter. Men of good will don't leap toward the state to redress every slight or greivance. They don't instantly say we should ban this or that.
"Someone of your ZH stature HAS to see the divide and conquer technique at work here."
I do, from many many different angles.
"As for the proposed laws, stupid is as stupid does."
The United Nations should be disbanded. It is my opinion it is the largest, singularly the most dangerous threat to our liberty on the face of the planet.
I'll chip in gas money.
Maybe drop by the hospital first, as he appears to have OD on koolaid.
Aristarchan sent this
"Never think that war, no matter how necessary, nor how justified, is not a crime."-Ernest Hemingway
I agree with that quote, and I would generalize it further.
There is always perpetual war ... It is only when the dynamic equilibria of the forms and forces of lies and robbery get sufficiently out of balance that the obvious shooting starts. That situation then selects for those who are the most criminal to prevail.
The big problem with history is that, before weapons of mass destruction, some people could end up winning wars, and those people control our civilization NOW ... However, nothing in that history prepared those people, or anybody else, for weapons of mass destruction. Which means we are being herded into a stampede towards wars that will become CRIMES on a scale that is beyond our current imagination, such that nothing else we valued before will be worth that, since almost everything else we valued, and might have thought was worth fighting for, will be destroyed by weapons of mass destruction that are trillions of times bigger than the people that built and will use them!
The vast majority of people appear to have the same mathemagical view of weapons of mass destruction as they do about the economic system. It is hard to imagine how we can learn that those weapons are orders of magnitude more powerful than we are, and will destroy everything we care about, or thought was worth fighting over, when our obsolete social habits and pyschological attitudes drive us to start using them. Those amongst us that are the most wealthy and powerful, the group of trillionaire mass murders, are the ones that won the most from past wars, and are most eager to get another one going, BUT, they are also the people with the least realistic understanding of what they will be doing, and how far, far, far out of control, and beyond them, the war that they are deliberately starting, could go!!!
Otto, a greenie on ya, especially from the guy who "fought" in the Spanish Civil War (we'll be seein' if that heart continues) as well as the one who "liberated Paris" w/SLAM.
But, and I do need to bring this up, we have:
John Stuart Mill, as all the playz' well know.
http://www.quotationspage.com/quote/27169.html e.g. but well cited for those reasons.
- Ned
junkstaz b nay playaz!
Don't cha' know.