This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
Sins of the Past
Sins of the Past
Ben Bernanke has said many times that Marriner Eccles, the head of the Federal Reserve in 1936/37 made a mistake by tightening credit (raising reserve requirements). Bernanke blames Eccles’s actions for the 50% stock market collapse in 1937 and the second leg of the depression that followed.
Bernanke’s interpretation of Eccles’s actions is widely held by historians. It was FDR who first (conveniently) blamed the Fed. I think that Bernanke is also (conveniently) blaming Eccles. He is using history's interpretation to support his position that monetary policy must be set on MAX for the next three years. He has said that he will not make the same mistake that poor old Eccles made.
Eccles was in a bind. His job at the Fed was to maintain relative stability of prices and the stock of money. In the years prior to 1937 money flowed into the USA from Europe. This "flight capital" fled to the USA in the form of gold shipments. The money came because the holders of wealth were anticipating a major war. With gold reserves rising, so did the supply of money. M1 increased 55%, and money in demand accounts rose 71% from 1933 to 1936. More troubling were rising inflationary pressures. In the first six-months of 1936, wages rose by 11%. Wages in the critical steel industry rose by 33%. These conditions would scare any reasonable Central Banker.
The Fed itself answered the historical question of whether the Fed’s actions in 1936-37 was responsible for the 1937-38 double dip. In a research paper, (PDF Link) St. Louis Fed researcher Charles Calomiris concluded:
We find that despite being doubled, reserve requirements were not binding on bank reserve demand in 1936 and 1937, and therefore could not have produced a significant contraction in the money multiplier.
Much of today’s monetary policy is based on the historical interpretation of the consequences of the Fed’s actions. If the Fed was not to blame for the 1937 crash, then who/what was? In her book, “The Forgotten Man”, Amity Shlaes provides some answers. She points to a critical speech by then Treasury Secretary Morgenthau on November 10, 1936:
The war against the Depression had required deficit spending. But the emergency is ending, and the domestic problems we face today are essentially different from those which faced us four years ago. We want private business to expand. We believe that one of the most important ways of achieving these ends is to continue toward a balance in the federal budget.
Morgenthau’s comments 75 years ago (and the following cut backs in federal spending that took place in 1937) remind me of where we sit today. After four-years of spending like mad to fight the recession/depression of 2008, the federal government has committed itself to dramatic cuts in spending starting in January of 2013. Coupled with those cuts are across the board tax increases for every individual who has income.
In the book, Shlaes points to other factors that contributed to the crash of '37:
*The rapid rise of wages/raw materials in 36/37 led to a conclusion by many that corporations were going to face a profit squeeze. It was this threat that led to the 1937 stock market fall. We face a similar situation today. Rising commodity prices and global wages will impact consumers and company’s bottom line. (Think Apple and Foxconn)
*Social Security was collecting money from every paycheck by 1937. This reduced disposable income and contributed to the recession. This is not unlike what we face in 2013 when SS taxes are scheduled to rise by 2%.
*FDR wanted to balance the budget. He raised taxes in 1937; this was a big factor in the decline of the economy. We face the same scenario in 2013 when large increases in taxes are scheduled.
*In November of 1936 Nazi Germany signed the Anti-Comintern Act with Japan and Italy. While there were many like Neville Chamberlain, who ignored the evidence that a war was coming, the financial markets did not. This too, has similarities with 2012.
I think we are about to re-make many of the mistakes of 1936/37. The programmed spending cutbacks, couple with the many impending tax increases on 1/1/2013, will certainly cause a sharp contraction in economic activity.
Bernanke’s Fed has sworn that it won’t make the mistakes of 1936/37. But I've shown (and the Fed’s own research confirms) that Fed policy was not the cause of the '37 crash. Bernanke is relying on a false interpretation of history to justify his monetary policy today.
We will face an economic slowdown due to lower federal spending, and at the same time, inflation will be rising as a result of the excessively loose monetary policy. Stagflation is in our future. Should this be the result, the historians will say that both the Fed and fiscal policy are to blame. In other words, we have not learned a thing from our past mistakes.
.
- advertisements -





Thanks for the interesting interpretation of the thirties and the parallels to today. You are not 100 percent correct however. Ha ha. Bad. You're as right or more so than the vast majority. And I haven't read any of the other comments, so this is purely directed at the article.
"Cut??" Where's the cut? The Messiah just submitted the largest budget in the history of mankind at around $3.8 TRILLION for 2013. They don't call him The Messiah for nothing. If you actually think they will enact the legally agreed to cuts, then you under estimate the power of The Ministry of Truth. As we have seen, they can convince sheeple up is down and down is up all day long. That's child's play for them. Spending more money for the greatest socialist America has ever elected and lying about it, is as natural as growing grass.
"I think we are about to re-make many of the mistakes of 1936/37. The programmed spending cutbacks, couple with the many impending tax increases on 1/1/2013, will certainly cause a sharp contraction in economic activity."
The mistake was running up 1.5 trillion a year in deficits in the first place and spending 15-20 years running up a huge credit bubble. Once you start down that path, there is no good result. Neither is OK but one has to happen. So calling budget cutting a "mistake" seems pretty silly. The mistakes have already happened. We could have gotten out with just a bad hit had we not turned the economy over to Pelosi, Reid and Obama. They have emphatically removed any "merely bad" options from the table.
"In November of 1936 Nazi Germany signed the Anti-Comintern Act with Japan and Italy."
History will record that we fought WWII to make the world safe for communism and to open up the great competition between the bolshevic brand (Russia) and the Frankfort School brand (the U.S.)
And keeping the world safe for communism was so important that I received the same "combat" ribbon my father earned, (United States Army of Occupation, Europe) even though I was born after that war.
GLD & SLV
http://sheepgetslaughtered.blogspot.com
Mr. Krasting
I have immense respect for you and Ms Shlaes, but if people of your caliber studied some military history, both you and Ms Shlaes would be much more helpful to us with your research and analytical experience and skills.
Simply put: MILITARY = FINANCE. Inseparable.
All those reasons you mentioned were good ones. However, as you mentioned there was a war coming up. Hence, world was in balance. Shrinking of money supply was bad, but nothing as bad as international tariffs and protectionism. Real Goods were not circulating the world because no superpower existed to guarantee world trade, movement of goods. Countries had no problem denying food exports etc. Nobody would bother them.
Enter United States Navy. US Navy and the military might of US is the only reason we do not have a full blown depression. US Navy makes sure goods go from point A to point B to point C..... Regardless of the emotional power of war and its human cost (no doubt about it), US Navy is doing this job perfectly well.
To make things clear, I am not american. I am from Europe living in Canada and have dual citizenship. This doesn't mean that I shouldn't be grateful to US Navy for securing world trade. Canada has its important part as a NORAD ally. It's clear that the lack of world balance is good for world trade.
And since US Navy secures world trade, a nice chunk of DEBT DESTRUCTION is necessary in order to reduce the interest payments on all parties, states, businesses and individuals.
It will lead to DEATH AND RESURRECTION rather than the current death by a thousand cuts. Anybody is aware of Jesus Christ story?
You would have made a good roman tribune in the year 200 AD under Septimius Severus; the man who was of African origin from Leptis Magna, built the best marble toilets in his home town (Chicago, Chicago; gave me big entitlements), and ramped up his own Praetorian guard to 50000 (3 wars and still more coming; Guantanamolese and NDAA sauce) and ran the Empire further down the road to debt ruin and adventurism, all the while the moral fabric of its elites became more effete.
So yes, militarism and finance go hand in hand on the road to ruin. MIC + WS is the writing on the wall today of Pax Americana, and guess whose winning this battle.
Septimius Severus - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
GLAD YOU AGREE ON THE CONCEPT.
Commentary on it is subject to further studies and opinions. You have yours I have mine.
People with resources like Krasting and Shlaes should run with this concept that you and I agree upon and expand into further studies by using their excellent analytical skills and experience.
+1 FP. Here's someone who knows a little military history!
How about Europe and USA/Canada/Mexico start making their own products instead of shipping everything accross the world? We wouldn't need the US Navy and war after war. This globalization thing is so warped, can we finally stop with this nonsense?
I can't really follow all you are asserting; please expand on how you know what you know. Simply put, write more.
Thx for the comment.
I am as curious as you are. But when China asserted its soverignity over South China sea in 2008 right after the crash thinking USA is weak now, Bloomberg interviewed the commander of the US Navy Fleet on South China sea. He basically said in nice words, FUCKOFF. He also emphasised that his job was protect trade routes from Far East to Europe and North America. That's when I started being curious.
Unfortunately, the argument is very emotional because soldiers are getting killed in Afghanistan and Iraq (God bless their souls).
Moreover, we do not see anywhere in the news or employment data, how many people are employed by miltary, directly or indirectly.
Anybody knows?
Ultimately, w/o productivity, things fall apart. Our culture has one potent product: promotion of sloth. The parasites are enabled (if not outright encouraged) to mooch (or actually have somebody else mooch on their behalf). The productive are discouraged (if not outright attacked) for earning wealth. The spirit of the self-supporting individual is being sucked out and crushed. If you can't turn that around, all of the technical tweaks won't fix shit.
egoist:
don't cha' know. Why, it is unsustainable!
- Ned
No way is the goobermint going to stop the defecit (read stimulus) spending. It'll amount to 1.8T again this year and continue at that rate for the forseeable future. The prigs may raise taxes but that'll all get redistributed to the helpless folks as EBT raises and tax rebates for those that never pay tax anyways. All those highways e just built - we'll just tear em all up and do it all over again - shovel ready!
Oh. Have a nice day! :-)
PS - Go long Apple and retail as it'll be Toys-R-US forever.
Interesting post. The boom and bust cycles will never cease as long as we use a fractional reservse system backed by "faith" in money backed only by government debt. Only sound money backed by a finite resource like gold will provide a stable system, where saving from production and work are the basis of future capital investment. This minimizes malinvestments but cannot eliminate them as humans, ruled by greed and fear are involved and can't resist the "something for nothing" philosophy. Obviously, among politicians only Ron Paul, has studied and understands monetary history enough to get us on the right trajectory but he knows he can't do it alone.
He has said that he will not make the same mistake that poor old Eccles made.
Ya gotta give up thinking these things are mistakes if you hope to understand what's happening.
There's been no mistakes. Everything back then happened as planned just like everything now is happening as planned.
The '08 collapse was planned along with everything since then, money printing, bailouts, QE, all of it.
You have to understand the true plan, robbing America blind, stealing all the wealth they can from the American people.
Yur darned tootin'.
yup yup yup
+1000
You don't turn a recession into a great depression with one stupid mistake. It takes a lot of stupid mistakes. I made a list of them:
Hoover:
FDR:
Assisted the USSR in the take-over of half of Europe, causing the initiation of the Cold War which substantially increased Federal defense spending for decades, reducing net economic activity
Got one for Bush and Obama yet?
Yes and they are longer.
PS... also, your history starts too late to get an accurate grip on what happened, because the table was set after the war, and finally set in stone by 1927. So you're late. Check out www.nar2012.com, you might want to buy the book, it's an inexpensive way to get a grip.
Via con Dios Amigo
Hate to rain on your parade dude, but Taft Hawley wasn't anywhere near the largest tariff hike in U.S. history. I'll stop there, because so much of your stuff is off the cuff it reads like Wikipedia... somewhere around 70% accurate. Yawn....
Whatever, fag. Rebutt or STFU.
dang, who knew that Milton's and Anna's Nobel Prize could be summarized so well. Plus 1 on the CEO thingie ! - Ned
{ED. of course, this is on the Hoover-statist bastard as well as the double-FDR-Double-bastard-statist-bastardz}
Bruce. You should look at the global economy of 1421. Much more relevant today than 1921.
Yeah, if we could only get this central planning of the time value of money thing right, everything would be OK.
They learned plenty, they can keep "running the table" on the sheep as long as they want with no repercussions. Its all bought and paid for with 17 Trillion of debt kicked down the road. The banksters ride off into the sunset with ALL the bags of loot ....again.
"Nobody could have seen it coming"
So, we let politicians and banksters skim everyone's money, demand obedience, and run the world.
What could possibly go wrong with that???
In taking responsibility for our excessive spending we must stop spending what we do not have. Getting rid of this debt will take years and alot of pain. Austerity will be our motto for years to come. There is alot still going for us here if we start now, sort of like starting a real energy policy for a change. We do not have to end up like europe or a stagnatting Japan. We need leadership willing to give up getting re-elected and get the job started. Not one of the reasons for our dilemna we are currently in has been fixed. All we have done is expand the money supply (QE) and bailed out banksters and Wall Street and added more regulation to the economy (can we say Dodd Frank, Obamacare, Volker rules for examples). Prez Owe is getting his wish to destroy America and bring us to our knees...he is spending us into oblivion. This is not the capitalist path. Tar and feather the Keynsians...welcome in the Austrian economics of Hayek et. al.....
Bennie - the Ponzi Ball Wizzard...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EK33CY68s1w&feature=related
We are all the new Sodomites.
Better a Sodomite than a Gomorrahian. Whatever the act was that gave that city its name and invoked the wrath of God is unknown, but it must have been particularly nasty to have been expunged from the pages of history. One shudders to think.
unknown? are you sure? the hints are quite clear, I thought: the Sodomites maintained that the male sexual urge should be satisfied - always and with whatever. And Gomorrans maintained the same for for the female sexual urge. both was not ok for the God of Abraham, who urged some restraint - best by a social order and institutions like marriage.
note that in antiquity there were many walled cities that had customs inside the walls that were radically different from the customs outside the walls. (including a holy ban on arms inside the walls)
and many that had Aphrodite Temples where religious prostitution was encouraged - many poor country girls around Corinth were brought for a year in the city by their fathers so that they could earn their dowry and then marry. and this with the blessing of the priests, of course.
I like the way you think.
more like doing it with flies if the market is now centrally owned, thats all thats left to the small guys; flies.
Where are you from, dude?
I'm from "free of flies" land and you?
eh? that part of Egypt that was free of flies because the Israelites lived there?
I was not aware there was a real land completely free of flies
You haven't been to Xanadu where I llive?
LOL - all I know is that you are very attentive and knowlegdable about French politics - let me guess: you live in Tahiti and are sleepless with a nice glass of Armagnac next to you.
I met once the General of the Legion that was overseeing the nuclear experiments there - nice chap, of polish origins - hence the guess...
S/b Ain't learnt a dang thang.
Bernanke is mistaken and his policy has already landed this country one downgrade of the AAA credit rating with more to follow. How in the hell is this guy lauded for leadership of our econoomy is beyond me. This is nothing but short sided thinking that will likely bankrupt all of us. I'm not so cynical to think that this is his plan but it makes you wonder.
Is the slowdown really due to structural peak resource issues?
Oil boom in Wyoming? Shale s of Canada? The low low low price of natural gas that people are switching over to in droves? The influx of cheap solar from China? The new fracking technology? The list goes on and on and on. Most of the world hasnt even been explored yet. There is plenty of energy and wealth left to exploit that energy despite what the dilbert curve says.
And don't forget about Texas from El Paso to Brownsville- covered with shale oil and natural gas.
It's actually embarrassing to hear people go on about Hubbard's Peak Oil. Almost like they can't think at all for themselves. Embarrassing.
my my, land of milk and burpy honey; maybe they'll find truffles when they make it land of gruyere cheese!
Orly, is that really you? (> (> (>