This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
UK Parliament Member Lord James of Blackheath Alleges 15 Trillion Dollar Fraud Involving the Fed and Imaginary Gold
British Parliament member Lord James of Blackheath has alleged in a speech before Parliament an elaborate fraud involving the US government lying about hundreds of thousands of tons of imaginary gold, illegal wire transfers and loans totaling $15 trillion:
We have no idea whether Lord James is onto something big ... or has fallen prey to the equivalent of a Nigerian internet scam.
As the Independent notes:
The House of Lords was treated to a 10-minute speech last week by Lord James of Blackheath, from whom we have not heard much since he announced in 2010 that he was in touch with Foundation X, a "genuine and sincere" secret organisation that wanted to lend the British government £75bn.
David James was a City businessman commissioned by the Tories, in opposition, to report on ways of eliminating government waste. Last week, the 74-year-old peer was exercised about a story he has picked up that $15trn – that is $15,000,000,000,000 – belonging to "the richest man in the world", Yohannes Riyadi, was deposited in 2009 in the Royal Bank of Scotland. Lord James said he remains baffled after a two-year pursuit of the story, but has all the information on a memory stick, which he is offering to hand over to the Government.
His documents include a letter from the Bank of Indonesia telling him the whole story is a "complete fabrication". He took his concerns to the Treasury minister, Lord Sassoon, who said: "This is rubbish. It is far too much money. It'd stick out like a sore thumb and you can't see it in the RBS accounts."
And an alert Financial Times blogger said that had Lord James googled "Yohannes Riyadi", the first item to come up would be a warning from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York that the name is part of an internet scam designed to get money from the gullible. Two agents are trying to trace who is behind it. Perhaps Lord James should offer his memory stick.
»
- advertisements -
Just scan the documents for the term "Western Union."
If it pops, it must be a scam.
Do we need any further data points to show that the paper money regime is bad, full of bad people, and is bad for us? That the amounts of money regularly toted up on various bank sheets around the world are, delicately speaking, arbitrary?
15 Trillion? Check
Mysterious Men? Check
Made-up accounts? Check
... et cetera?
Believe this man, don't believe him. It doesn't matter. What he is saying may as well be true, and hence there is no point of disproving it.
Is this that Leo Wanta thing that was floating around about a decade ago? What the hell was that, anyway? Did anyone ever explain that? It sounded to me a lot like a paranoid schizophrenic thing at best. More likely some sort of scam. I was hoping it was all some kind of "Illuminatus!" tongue-in-cheek put-on, but I missed the punchline.
One of the best parts of the Leo Wanta set of stories, was the part where it was claimed Alan Greenspan was arrested, I think for his role in hiding all the money.
It was fun just to imagine it.
here's my take- if these kind of bonds are real ....
they represent the deeeep economics of world war 2. they are traded and recognized only at central queens piggy bank levels.
german black gold bonds seem to have been stolen from wanta/reagan/vatican attacks on soviet union by the bush cabal
and represent what the nesara dreamers were on about. exposing this is the best reason for wellstone i've read.
the japanese/philipines versions are for chinese gold. due date sept.10 01. and are refrenced in the ny lawsuit and blackhieth.
- i think they are the old paper reresentation of "pigments of monetary imaginations'" of the past surfacing to cover
today's digital imaginary money- quadrillions of world wide derivitive debt. ie- to make the unreal- real.
just my two trillion cents worth. have fun.
-the 'other spiritual white boy'.
what is funny is the best info on both has always been relegated to the most mambypamby new agey unicorns type sites you've ever seen:
http://divinecosmos.com/start-here/davids-blog/1026-financial-tyranny-final gotta get past the madonna superbowl ritual stuff
http://wtsnb.blogspot.com/ written by a weird looking lady with a banking backgound that writes fictional accounts of simular stuff
http://chasvoice.blogspot.com/2011/12/confirmed-trillion-dollar-lawsuit-that.html#axzz3auUFHarF summery of the fulford
referenced law suit filed in ny.
http://www.foundlifegh3.com/Blank.html
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?38491-White-Spiritual-Boy
these two are more from the philipines/japanese style beare bonds
http://www.scribd.com/doc/9421535/Collateral-Damage-Part-2-The-Subprime-Crisis-and-the-Terrorist-Attacks-on-September-11-200126122008
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/presenting-exchange-stabilization-fund-5-parts-real-plunge-protection-team
if you missed this guy, son of one of the founders of the fed blaming treasury dept. for this kind of stuff
Getting hard to tell the scams from the genuine deals, eh?
You can't tell the players without a program.
Or, as Lord Carlin said, "It's a big club, and you aren't in it."
I am on the fence with this one.
Could be a psyop. Could be legit.
Will be interesting to see how it plays out.
Whatever the U.S. government does is a fraud or a cover-up for the crimes their owners commited.
I had a look at some of this guy's previous video remarks, claims and calls for support for investigations of his problematic financial mysteries and shadowy figures.
He's all over the shop! The people listening are laughing. The people he consulted and whom he quotes told him it was nonsense. Not evidence he's wrong, but it sure is ... disconcerting.
Plus his papers ... wtf? ... talk about farcically disorganised.
Plus he constantly mixes up the numbers, and in earlier videos swaps billions for trillions and visa-versa.
It looks like absurd dysinfo to me, but let's see if the HSBC receipts are real, and if Alan and Timmah are taking calls on this.
But the thing I don't get is why he's so bad at it?
Who would want a guy like him to say this stuff?
To 'normalise' the ranting nutter buffoon, who's talking nonsense about trillions in transfers, so they're henceforth discounted and ignored, as a first and second response?
And when will WikiLeaks be releasing the 104meg thumb-drive-of-insider-knowledge-bliss?
Rabbit-holes ... they can fuck you up.