Evidence of Electronic Vote Fraud Pours In from Both Liberal and Conservative Sources

George Washington's picture

Ron Paul supporters, progressives and the mainstream media have all discussed the potential for vote fraud.

A global internet voting company headquartered in Spain recently purchased America’s dominant election results reporting company.

The Wall Street Journal wrote in a 2008 article entitled, “Will This Election Be Stolen?“:

And then there are the e-voting machines. Since early voting started recently, worried voters have reported seeing their votes flipped from Barack Obama to Mr. McCain in West Virginia and Texas.

We reported in 2006:

The non-partisan and highly-respected government agency, the Government Accountability Office, verified that the electronic voting machines used in 2004 were wide open to fraud, and that fraud likely occured in Ohio, Iowa, Nevada, New Mexico, and other states.


The security flaws in electronic voting machines are so complete that anyone can instantaneously install software which will change the vote counts. See this New York Times’ Magazine analysis, and also E-Voting Machine an Easy Hack from Wired Magazine.


Exit polling data shows that there was vote fraud.


And Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and leading reporter Greg Palast have shown that the emperor’s cronies intentionally spoiled, rejected, purged and otherwise refused to count enough ballots to take the election away from Kerry (not that I like Kerry). See also this article.


Moreover, And spend 10 minutes at this website and you’ll realize that electronic vote fraud is not some raving conspiracy theory, but is real.


Indeed, the following headlines from the last two weeks hint at the magnitude of the fraud:

In this 2012 election, reports of electronic vote fraud are now pouring in from both liberal and conservative sources:




“Experimental” software patches on Ohio voting machines may sway the vote.

And Steve Watson notes:

Multiple reports of electronic voting machine irregularities have begun to pour in from all over the country as Americans take to the polls today.


Voters in Hamilton County Indianapolis were forced to wait for 30 minutes to begin voting because the machines were not working when the polling station opened.


The AP reports that “cards used to clear tallies from machines before voting begins were improperly programmed,” meaning that around 500 machines had to be “reset”.


The Toledo Blade reports that some 100 voters were unable to cast ballots this morning in Bedford, Ohio, because a voting machine was not working. Officials said that a memory card had to be replaced. Long lines led to people walking away.


In Dubuque, Iowa, more voters were delayed when machines failed to operate for around 45 minutes after the polling station opened.


Reports from across North Carolina, one of the key swing states, are pouring in suggesting that voting machines are flipping votes from one candidate to the other.


In Greensboro, “a voter complained that they tried to vote for Mitt Romney three times but that the ballot cast was instead for Barack Obama. Other voters in Guilford County and in some other parts of the state said they experienced similar issues.”


In Charlotte, another voter reported the same problem.


In Rehoboth, Massachusetts problems with voting machines were also noted. The machines officials are using are 14 years old, according to the report. Problems were also reported in Tewksbury, Massachusetts.


In Milford Township, Pennsylvania, three voting machines stopped working after just one hour of voting. After a technician got them working again, one of them broke down a second time, causing waiting voters to begin discussing their distrust of the machines and the potential for voter fraud.


In Crawford County, problems with machines were also reported. They had not been set to the correct time, so were unable to be used for a short period of time.


In Missouri, the Secretary of State’s office has been forced to respond after numerous voters claimed that machines were flipping votes for Romney to votes for Obama.


In Pittsburgh, voters have reported multiple problems with voting machines.


In Sandy Springs, Georgia, hundreds of people were delayed when voting machines went down at around 11 a.m.


In Nashville, Tennessee, technical issues with the machines were reported by many voters, while in Chattanooga, machines malfunctioned, meaning some voters had to put their ballots in the machine without them being scanned.


In Fredericksburg, Northern Virginia, hundreds of voters were turned away as all of the electronic voting machines at one polling station failed to operate. Polling workers only had 50 paper ballots available. Worse still, some voters who used the machines were told that their votes would not count if they had placed them before 8am.


In Spartanburg County, South Carolina, voting machines have failed to work all day and election officials have twice run out of paper ballots.


In Faulkner County, Arkansas, machines were reported inoperable.


Some areas in Virginia reported voting machine problems.


Voters in California have complained that voting machines switched their votes for Obama to Romney.




Last week this same problem was reported in six other states.


In Ohio, a lawsuit has been filed following the installation of software into voting machines by the state that experts say could allow “back door” vote manipulation by non-election board officials.


Green Party candidate Robert J. Fitrakis filed papers yesterday in federal court in Columbus, seeking an order blocking the use of the machines and the software in vote counting. Named as defendants in the case are Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted and Omaha,


Nebraska- based Election Systems & Software Inc.


As we have routinely reported during elections, electronic voting machines have caused significant problems. Many security experts are adamant that the machines can easily be hacked, and past cases have shown that vote fraud has been facilitated by the use of electronic voting machines.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Mercury's picture

If I find out that we elected the doom ticket when the doom-lite ticket actually won the vote I'm going to be pissed...

Dr. Sandi's picture

This is not the shade of grey I wanted.

persu's picture

Endless conspiracy. Yes, the whole world is based on fraud.

Future Jim's picture

The video where the voting machine counts a vote for Obama as a vote for Romney doesn't pass the smell test because:

  1. The video starts and stops a lot
  2. Obama was supposedly cheated out of votes, but he won in spite of having stagnated the economy (verified here)
  3. It would be the least likely way to cheat given that the user would see it, get mad, and record it with his cell phone - just like he did in this video.

Now consider that this video would have caused riots and death if Obama had lost. If it were fake, then the creator would have to have sold his soul. Given the probability of fakery and the serious consequences, those who propagated it widely would be of questionable ethics at best.

Translator's picture

Wite people have voted to become second class citizens.

seataka's picture

 A brown Fox came into the yard tripped the security light, headed straight for the chicken house This is the second time. I think I'll name him Obama.

BigDuke6's picture

After what they did to demographics in europe they know well that america is the first of the domino's to fall.

The USA election, number of votes are neck and neck, but Obama will take 95% of the black vote and 2/3 of the hispanic vote so the result is that the white vote would have been a majority for Romney but over turned by black and hispanic voting. 

Is it a colour thing?  in the usa i suspect it is.

Cthonic's picture

Sorry to spoil your rant, however around 90 million people did not vote yesterday, whatever their colour.  The ticket Sloth Nihilian won by a landslide, again.

Dr. Sandi's picture

Actually, nearly 7 BILLION people didn't vote for Obamney yesterday.

Does that give them the right to complain, or do they just have to suck it up?

Dr. Sandi's picture

That means the next 4 years are STILL BUSH'S FAULT!

The Heart's picture




geekgrrl's picture

I'm certain that as I write this, results are being "re-written." Joseph Stalin knew the score: he who counts the votes, counts. Even better, just create them out of thin air, like fiat money! Electronic voting is an absolutely ideal medium for vote tampering and creating. Those electrons are ethereal and eminently subject to change.

My confidence in this election = 0.0 

lakecity55's picture

I never liked those machines.

GW was smart to compile the list of problems.

Screw voting until we go back to paper ballots.

Of course, O-Phone will soon alleviate us of ever having to vote again.

You cannot look at the popular, human turnout at rallies and convince me O-Phone won straight up.

I went for the Libertarian Congressional candidate in my district. He had several hundred votes in my area alone, but his district total was suspiciously low. The Republican Machine guy won.


Dr. Sandi's picture

When they're done tampering, trillions of votes will have been cast for both candidates. Then immediately cancelled before they are actually counted.

Welcome to High Speed Voting.

jackinrichmond's picture

this sort of voter fraud is an act of domestic terrorism.

all the people involved should be arrested immediately and detained indefinitely.

Savvy's picture

Follow the money, whichever candidate got the most campaign donations bought the most voting machines. This is fucking hilarious, the US presidential campaign has descended into which party can drag the other from the booth LMAO!!! History doesn't repeat but it does rhyme LOL!!

DeadFred's picture

Hopefully Romney has better hackers than Obama. Holder has to go. Better yet would be if Romney stole the election AND dissatisfaction with the process helps bring the system down. 

Goldilocks's picture

Sheryl Crow - Everyday Is A Winding Road
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=khrx-zrG460 (4:20)

news printer's picture
Evidence of Electronic Vote Fraud; Youtube simple question

"what is going on with Youtube counting?
859 views only and 14,678 votes for Yes; 1,131 votes for No. ???
            Is it possible?"

sharky2003's picture

And this is why I jumped at the chance to vote on paper instead of waiting in line for the electronic machines. Strangely enough, despite being assured it was quicker and was counted instantly, I was the only person out of about 10 (all who could hear the poll worker) who jumped out of line to do it.

Peter Pan's picture

What did Americans expect when they have opted for computer generated votes and computer generated money?

NoSePuede's picture

I can't escape the feeling that these problems are being induced to raise the "anger" and "suspicion" levels in the American people.  How?  I don't know.  But when the wingnuts on both sides start to act up violently, a crackdown on civil liberties - and even more surveillance - will "become justified".

If the election is too close, God help us.

willwork4food's picture

It will be close as planned. Then they will get to play with their new toys, as planned.

Yes, God help us.

fiddy pence haff pound's picture

since the Democrats seem to be losing so much from voter list cleansing and probably from voting fraud,

why don't they reverse these problems? I guess they don't care. Answer this conundrum and you

answer the main problem of American democracy.

New_Meat's picture

"Evidence of Electronic Vote Fraud Pours In from Both Liberal and Conservative Sources"

But not from Cook County or Philadelphia. Hmmmm, OH! That's Right!

No such evidence ever leaks out of those places.  And even the Black Panthaz roamin' in Philly won't have no stinkin' reportin' goin' on.

- Ned

{I'm wondering the O/U for the number of Philly precincts that will have more votes than they have registered voters.  Even better, the number that have more votes than people.  These towns need an enema.}

adr's picture

My middle class white Ohio city uses paper ballots, the minority in the majority cities use electronic machines. Wonder why that is? They always seem to have 90%+ turnout of the total population, not just regsitered voters based on the vote count.

More than 10% of the minority population is in jail. How can you get 90% of the population to vote when more than 10% of them are in jail, and even less than 90% are actually registered?

Stupid question right? Why do you need to be registered to vote?

lolmao500's picture

Who got the most electronic voting machines wins.

Zero Govt's picture

GW, i've found clear hard evidence both, repeat both, Presidential candidates have been taking massive campaign bungs (truckloads of cash) from Wall Street bankers in 'ETF political swaps' for an unholy amount of influence in Govt policy if they get elected

in fact both these corrupt-to-the-core candidates will put these sheister banksters priorities above the peoples in policy decisions in absolute contempt for the demoratic process

clearly the only people that should determine policy is the voting public during the electoral voting, not bribes outside of the democratic process

what shall i do with the corruption evidence, who do i report it to?

Yours Faithfully, Voter Not Born Yesterday

Dr. Sandi's picture

If you're smart, you'll keep it to yourself. And don't answer the door to strangers for the next few months.

koncaswatch's picture

I've voted in a variety of voter systems; not one of them was not open to the very real possibility of fraud, not one. At my last election the polling station had the electricity suddenly and mysteriously go out, at which time the "ladies" from the oversight committee immediately reached into their purses/bags (which shouldn't even be allowed in a sterile polling station) and stuffed the ballot box with pre-filled ballots; so paper systems have their drawback also.

I am however amazed at how easy it is to manipulate the variuos US/States voter systems, in this day and age.  I can't believe the ongoing argument in the US over such a basic anti-fraud principle as the concept of voter ID.

Zap Powerz's picture

My old linebacker coach used to tell us knuckle dragging skull crushers that if we weren't cheating we were not trying.

Words to live by.

With the amount of power and money at stake in a presidential election, there is no way both sides arent cheating.  The best cheaters will win cuz "if you aint cheatin, you aint tryin."

Dr. Sandi's picture

If you can't cheat effectively, you have no business in the seat of power.

Manic by Proxy's picture

Thank you for the lecture on morality and integrity. I can only hope you aren't reproducing, but I fear you have already polluted the gene pool.

Money 4 Nothing's picture

The media won't show any of that tonight. They need a clear winner tonight to prove that SCYTL works. Obama 43 Romney 40. Sad ain't it?

NuYawkFrankie's picture

Re Vote Fraud


As American as Apple Pie.... Zzzz..... zzzz...zzzz...z...

nofluer's picture

I hope no one is surprized at the "votes changing". Harry Reid is sitting in the Senate today as a benefit of "man-in-the-middle" vote fraud. (The SEIU has the contract for maintaining the machines in Reid's State, thus the access to install the untracable software change that allows the hacking from the parking lot.)

It worked really well for Reid and nothing was done about it. Thus the Dems were confident that they could expand their scam.

And since I've not heard of machines switching votes from Obama to Romney, I'm assumng that the Reps didn't have pre-election access to the machines.

NidStyles's picture

Didn't watch the video above then did you? Tyler why do you let these Trolls exist here?

Clowns on Acid's picture

GW - you are rigging the examples of voter fraud just like a rigged voting machine.

It is wll known and proved that the vast majority (maybe high as 90%) comes on the DEM side of the ledger.

Why do you think that NYC, Chicago, Boston, Detroit, Philly, LA, Oakland, etc are all bastions of the rigged ballot box?

Oh yeh...Al Franken in MN was a real hoot.

George Washington's picture

Both mainstream parties are corrupt, sir ... We

lakecity55's picture

Sory, GW, but V Fraud is an art form with the Socialists.


Milton Freewater's picture

This is the first time I have ever down voted you Mr. Washington.  A third party, if introduced, will be corrupted by the same powers that corrupted the first two.  Why would big pharm, big oil, big "Defence" let a third party walk around speaking truths that would cost them money?  I belive in world peace, Mr. Washington. No "party" can claim such a goal. The force that will move people to change will not come from suits and ties.  The power that will move us to change will come from with-in.  No preacher, pontiff, party or president will guide us.  We must take responsibility for ourselves and the world around us. Peace is possable.  No leaders are necessary.     

I do look forward to your next posting.


mendigo's picture

I think it is a measure of the iq of the populace - what percent are will to choose from only two choices present by organizations which have a vested interest in the status quo. I mean do you really need more than two choices? Two was always good enough with my dad. Well only one chice would be easier and simpler. God bless America.

nofluer's picture

If my guy is running short of votes, I think I have a box with 37 ballots in the trunk of my car that I can find later...

blindman's picture

i really do not appreciate gratuitous use
of profane language and think little of those
that resort to the use or abuse of the language
by punctuating their discourse with these foul
expressions of ill repute, guttural utterances
from the unwashed masses. please, but this
scenario unfolding is one fucking shit hole show
revolving around a cluster fuck on steroids,
as designed and planned. something has to change for
the better here and some ass hole or group of ass holes
needs to go away from any position of influence for
ever, either that or we all go down to the pit.