This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
Update On Potential War Against Syria
We reported yesterday:
- 10,000 U.S. troops – as well as French, British and Nato troops – are amassing off the coast of Syria for a potential invasion
- “Anonymous U.S. sources” are claiming that Syria is mixing chemical weapons … but that claim is ridiculous … and could be part of a long-contemplated false flag attack in Syria
- War against Syria could lead to WWIII
Here are updates in this quickly-moving situation:
- Pentagon officials say that there is no evidence that Syria is mixing chemical weapons, and “it’s not even clear that the precursors have been moved from separate storage sites to one location”
- On the other hand, the the Syria Tribune has released a video allegedly showing Syrian rebels killing rabbits with chemical weapons, and threatening to use them against supporters of the Syrian government. (It is impossible at this point to say whether this is genuine or propaganda)
- The U.S. will designate one of the leading Syrian rebel groups as a terrorist operation. McClatchy notes that – until recently – the Syrian opposition blamed this terrorist group’s attacks on the government. In other words, the terrorist violence carried out by one of the main opposition groups was wrongly blamed on the Syrian government (in fact,the U.S. has backed various terrorist opposition groups in Syria)
- And Russia has docked 2 warships in Syria, in a show of support for the government
»
- advertisements -
Idaho
Montana, Colorado, Washington State?
Yes -let's take out Canada. I'd say get france, but they have nukes. Quebeccans have pissed me off with their arrogance for a long time. There's probably a bunch of draft dodgers still there from the Vietnam war. A bunch of old farts by now -but it doesnn't matter -let them have a taste of Guantanamo pie! USA! USA! Kick some foreign ass , BABY!
SavyinDallas:
Yep, but I have a secret that I'll share only with you on that particularly frustrating issue with Les Quebecoise.
Ask them when Les Habitants are going to get off their tired asses and start playing 'ockey.
You will, with 100% certainty, get full entertainment value out of the response.
- Ned
"Lets drop the Big One now. They don't like us anyhow, so lets drop the Big One now. We'll save Australia. Don' wanna hurt no kangaroo. We'll make it an AllAmerican amusement park. They got surf in' too!" Randy Newman
"Lets drop the Big One now. They don't like us anyhow, so lets drop the Big One now. We'll save Australia. Don' wanna hurt no kangaroo. We'll make it an AllAmerican amusement park. They got surf in' too!" Randy Newman
Seriously Canada is on the list for US invasion ... with US troops already designated to 'protect' the Canadian tar sands oil fields and some of the hugest oil deposits in the world
Only the invasion will be fully 'legal' because the Quisling government of Canada signed away its sovereignty to the USA back in the last decade
Canada signed a 'Security Partnership' formally giving US troops the right to impose martial law security on Canadian soil ... whenever there is a new 'terrorist' incident affecting North America
And that incident can be conveniently arranged anytime
The US invaded Canada twice before - in the 1700s and then again during the Napoleonic wars (US 'War of 1812', of which invading Canada was a principal US objective)
But this 3rd time it is Canada's sell-outs who have already agreed in advance to Hitler's Anschluß, er, American annexation of Canada
As World War III gets underway Canada and Mexico will simply be 'assimilated' by them 'Merikans
They hate us for our Stanley Cup. Eh?
Nah, it's your great beer and good cigs we covet. And the chicks in Vancouver. Yea.
Nothing personal you understand, just business.
Thank you for the well cited backing documentation for the unfortunate inevitability.
After Syria, Iran. After Iran, North Korea. Who's next for America's warmongers?
Remember when the Democrats were the anti war party?
Yeah, those were good times.
You mean the democrats who were in charge in ww1 and ww2 and nam and bosnia. Am i missing anything?
According to Brzezinski, Russia comes after Iran.
Who's left for America's warmongers?
I was hoping it would be Isreal but they seem to be the one's choosing where America's warmongers go...
Thank the gods that Israel isn't involved. - Ned
is-ra-el not involved? surely you jest...
No, really, he said Isreal, and I don't know where that is. Do you?
And do you know anything about another country that is local to the zone and what they are actually doing?
Or you just not aware of anything?
- Ned
{Truly, do you have any info? Are you read-in? Or just shitting GW as we sometimes do??? ???}
{{ya, I'm jesting, because the shit that is purported to be "truth" or "truthiness" is, well, ... I'd guess that you can figure out the rest.}}
{{{ Don't cha' know.}}}
{{{{and GW has a burden of proof that he will/will not fulfill. I'm betting on the under.}}}}
Iceland. Imperative to nip that whole freedom-from-bankstas movement in the bud ASAP. How dare those Nordic extremists embrace LIBERTY.
The only good Viking is a dead Viking. Send them to Valhalla!
That's the Nicklaus course outside Louisville, right?
I didn't know they golfed...
Say a cute blonde caddy ...
I'd suggest Rhode Island. At least we'd stand a chance of winning that one...
"So there's a chance then!"
Here is a pro tip Bollixed:
America doesnt fight wars to win them. America fights wars for money.
Exactly. Unless the defense stocks are saved in these pseudo-austere times, via an 'unexpected' expansion in defence spending, even a transient emergency temporary one (with extenuating and enduring security contingencies), then it's US banks that will get hosed ... by the subsequent margin calls as defense stocks take repeated hits.
"America fights wars for money."
In "Killing Them Softly" Jackie Cogan (Brad Pitt), the enforcer said: "America is not a country. It's a business. Now fucking pay me."
"There you have it."
Datz razzist. Breaka yo legas.
No fucka wida de Italianos, capiche?