This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
Insider Trading 9/11...Unresolved, by Lars Schall
Below, please find a fascinating excerpt from the book “Mordanschlag 9/11. Eine kriminalistische Recherche zu Finanzen, Öl und Drogen” ("Assassination 9/11: A criminalistic research on finance, oil and drugs", Schild Verlag publishing house), by my friend, German journalist Lars Schall. Mr. Schall has been kind enough to allow my to reprint this excerpt here via Scribd.
Is there any truth in the allegations that informed circles made profits in the financial markets in connection to the attacks of September 11, 2001? More than a decade later, the German financial journalist Lars Schall examines and sheds some light on this still unresolved and unanswered mystery.
Insider Trading 911..Unresolved, by Lars Schall
»
- advertisements -
Taught them VERY WELL!
But Prescott had to know they would never be as good as the Rothschilds.
Who made more Carlyle Group on 9/11 or Rothschild during Napoleon's war?
Rest my case! :-)
By the time the truth emerges into the mainstream, if at all, most won't care anymore and TPTB will keep on with their megalomaniac corruption. They'll continue feeding the sheep with the recycled carcasses of our brethren as righteous propaganda.
Remember kids, this is THE decisive idealogical struggle of the 21st century. You are either with Bush, or you are with the terrorist.
9/11........Never forget.
And walways stand by Bush #1's invasion of Panama to get that cocaine processing down there back on track (either Noriega was skimming or he was halting all that coke smuggling and processing?).
That is the sad reality. Act accordingly, especially considering how little effect an individual can have.
http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/10_09_01_krongard.html
And that's all you need to know about 9/11. Everything else is just symantics and BS. Besides the death of innocent people.
God Bless all who lost on that fateful day.
Our prayers are with you and your families.
I will insert a few more educational links here:
http://www.serendipity.li/wot/aa_flts/aa_flts.htm
http://pimpinturtle.com/2009/06/24/911-fema-videographer-at-ground-zero-goes-public.aspx
Danny http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RNdW2V5V8W4
It makes you wonder what the next false flag will be to distract from the financial crisis and result in more totalitarian control; a dirty nuke on an American city? Hmmm, which one? I'd lay 2:1 on Detroit.
I was with a political action group which ran a computer pattern analysis of such a probable or possible event, and it came up with Florida as the leading contender, somewhere coastal or just off the ocoast in the ocean.
No doubt Doom, in the headlines today, there was a young black boy shot by an hispanic a day ago, the MSM is calling the boy white and now there will be an NAACP rally down there tommorow, sure to spark a race riot aka civil war. Good look @ that Fla widget.
Major city whose mayor is an insider. My money is on Chicago.
Willis Tower, formerly Sears Tower, owned by Lucky Larry Silverstein. . .
I read it had an old asbestos problem.
"IDF" emmanuel? what a shock. having dual citizens crawling all over the U.S. government and banking system has worked out splendidly.
Target Number One: New York City
Not likely. NYC has the largest number of Jews of any city on earth.
and wouldn't that just galvanise opinions, making room for net-a-yahoo's justified retribution? seems rather perfect. . .
BlackholeDivestment: NYC was not the target. The towers had to be destroyed or dismantled, and they turned that into a package deal. I think it's unlikely that NYC will be targeted by the same perps again. There's already too much risk in big cities in the event of financial and/or economic collapse. They're going to try to keep the key cities functioning.
The next false flag might well have to do with the internet. That would be a lot like the "terrorism" threat, which is to say unreal. They will just shut down parts of the web and tell us it was an attack. Then they'll pass a bunch of new laws and the web will be transformed when they bring it back up.
New York will be destroyed. http://www.financialsense.com/contributors/jr-nyquist/irans-nuclear-attack-plan
http://bible.cc/revelation/18-10.htm
Good points --- to destroy the computer systems and personnel unwittingly involved in the offshoring of $2 trillion of embezzled funds, those upper floors in the WTC towers had to go.
And that was one of the two primary reasons they installed that fiber optic cable so quickly leading up to 9/11 --- not only allowing access to the two towers upper floors, but the data communication transmission capability to send those monies out of the country. (EurekaGGN)
In agree with both scenarios, In our research, we have found a false flag brewing at an OWS event that involves firearms very soon. Chi-Town mayor will assume the role of Rudy Giuliani in a strange event of "domestic terrorism".
I buy that. There has been recent talk of "the next phase" in the OWS movement. Domestic terrorism. Ugh.
well, if you noticed in the movies and on tv, leading up to 911, NYC was shown as a scene of disaster(smoking gun)
later it was an oil well burning in the GOM(knowing)
more recently(contagion, the happening) philadelphia seems to pop up more and more often
so, my bet is on philly
unfortunately, thats 8 miles from where i live
I'm 15 mins from Tacony Palmyra.
Detroit is already a disaster
OK, Vince Flynn, or Tom Clancy or (Robert Ludlum if he were still with us) or somebody else - here's your material. Write a good one. Truth, or half-truth is better than fiction.
For chrissakes --- haven't you ever read anyone decent?
Just draft-dodgers and never-have-served types or know nothing of real intel and military ops?
Ludlum, one of the few authors whose movies were far superior to his pathetic books.
Tom Clancy is so far ahead of the curve. His stuff is like a sophisticated terrorist playbook. Crashing a plane into political targets? Tom Clancy thought of that a long time ago.
Some fun ones to look out for in the future: weaponized Ebola, rogue nuclear weapon, terrorist drug runners from Mexico...
To A Growing Concern commenter:
You are truly among the unknowing, dood!
For the people who originally came up with the idea of planes crashing into buildings, closely examine the passenger manifests of those airliners, plus the one retired US Navy pilot who was one other aircrew (I believe he was the Flight 77 pilot). Which was why no one came forward after 9/11, they were killed aboard those airliners and in the two towers that day.
As to weaponized bioweapons --- you have to begin paying attention to your environment and surroundings, dood, as in read the news sometime --- and you would have noticed that the NIH and CDC had funded the weaponization of H5N1 over in the Netherlands and in the USA in Wisconsin, at academic labs, where several of the proteges of the biologist at University of Pennsylvania who co-authored the report to the Bush administration warning of future H5N1 weaponization, are at!
And the same strain as mentioned in the Rockefeller Foundation's report on future scarey scenarios:
please note how they first warn -- at various venues -- then they fund and design the catastrophe.
Curious, huh, dood?
(FYI: it would have required a number of mutational iterations before such a weaponization occurred naturally, if it ever did occur -- which is possible to never have happened! Thusly, they weaponized a virus which easily could never have evolved to such a degree! Your tax dollars at work, Amerika!!!!)
Saw this up on ATO and wondered how long it would be before it showed up here. Follow the money and no, that's not a cave.
i doubt i know 10 people who have read 36 pages of text this year
excellent article, but unfortunately, just more jousting at windmills
but backs my premise that its the same dudes who did both 9/11 and 2008 crash
(and prolly the same guys who did a number of assassinations in the 60's)
i count between 40-50 trillion stolen between the two MINIMUM
astounds me that people around the net believe 'we' can fight this type of organization
Yeah, and however many trillion$ they reap(ed), its just a consequence of power.
Define "fight". And it's a cancer.
v. fought (fôt), fight·ing, fights v.intr.
1.
a. To attempt to harm or gain power over an adversary by blows or with weapons. b. Sports To engage in boxing or wrestling. 2. To engage in a quarrel; argue: They are always fighting about money. 3. To strive vigorously and resolutely: fought against graft; fighting for her rights. v.tr.
1.
a. To contend with physically or in battle. b. To wage or carry on (a battle). c. To contend for, by or as if by combat: "I now resolved that Calais should be fought to the death" (Winston S. Churchill). 2.
a. Sports To box or wrestle against in a ring. b. To participate in (a boxing match, for example). 3. To set (a boxer, for example) in combat with another. See Synonyms at oppose. 4. To contend with or struggle against: fight cancer; fight temptation. 5. To try to prevent the development or success of. 6. To make (one's way) by struggle or striving: fought my way to the top. n.
1. A confrontation between opposing groups in which each attempts to harm or gain power over the other, as with bodily force or weapons. 2. A quarrel or conflict. 3.
a. A physical conflict between two or more individuals. b. Sports A boxing or wrestling match. 4. A struggle to achieve an objective. See Synonyms at conflict. 5. The power or inclination to fight; pugnacity: I just didn't have any fight left in me.
Phrasal Verb:
fight off
To defend against or drive back (a hostile force, for example).
Idioms:
fight fire with fire
To combat one evil or one set of negative circumstances by reacting in kind. fight shy of
To avoid meeting or confronting. [Middle English fighten, from Old English feohtan, fihtan.] fighta·bili·ty n. fighta·ble adj. fighting·ly adv.
The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition copyright ©2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Updated in 2009. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
fight [fa?t]
vb fights, fighting, fought1. to oppose or struggle against (an enemy) in battle 2. to oppose or struggle against (a person, thing, cause, etc.) in any manner 3. (tr) to engage in or carry on (a battle, contest, etc.) 4. (when intr often foll by for) to uphold or maintain (a cause, ideal, etc.) by fighting or struggling to fight for freedom 5. (tr) to make or achieve (a way) by fighting 6. (Individual Sports & Recreations / Boxing) (intr) Boxing
a. to box, as for a living b. to use aggressive rough tactics 7. (Military) to engage (another or others) in combat fight it out to contend or struggle until a decisive result is obtained fight shy of to keep aloof from n
1. a battle, struggle, or physical combat 2. a quarrel, dispute, or contest 3. resistance (esp in the phrase to put up a fight) 4. the desire to take part in physical combat (esp in the phrase to show fight) 5. (Individual Sports & Recreations / Boxing) a boxing match See also fight back, fight off
[Old English feohtan; related to Old Frisian fiuchta, Old Saxon, Old High German fehtan to fight] fighting n & adj
Collins English Dictionary – Complete and Unabridged © HarperCollins Publishers 1991, 1994, 1998, 2000, 2003
Fight
Similes Dictionary, 1st Edition. © 1988 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Being literal can be a real handicap.
my point was the definition of fight does not matter
we can fight them. they are depending on humanity to roll over as the cabal is vastly outnumbered. certainly they have advanced technology, control of the media, medical system, political systems and monetary systems... but, humanity could take it all away very quickly, if only people would wake up.
No Shit Lars,... let's start with the insurance policy purchased by the edomite jew motherfucking owner of the towers who made sure he wasn't near the place where he usually was when the attack occurred. OK Lars, take it from here....
And what building was bombed in 1993? Wasn't Khobar Towers bombed in 1996.
Wasn't former Special Agent from FBI the director of security at WTC, Why? It's not like anyone could not figure out that WTC wasn't target of Islamic terrorist plot.
Hey, I was shorting stocks like crazy in 2001. Anyone looking at a chart could tell that the market was already crashing.
WTC was taken down by Islamist radicals. You and your moonbat friends on ZH need to find a cave and hang upside down for a while.
"WTC was taken down by Islamist radicals. You and your moonbat friends on ZH need to find a cave and hang upside down for a while."
This is funny, not because it invokes Muslims, but because it takes for-granted a patently false official story.
You're on the wrong side of history, Bub.
Thank you for outing yourself as a sockpuppet! It helps us greatly to differentiate between the traitors and the mere uninformed simpletons when making up the list for the guillotine.
Oh come on. "Pull it" means whatever he wants it to mean, regardless of what you think he said.
Lars has investigated and reported on the put options. Now it is your turn to edify us on "the edomite jew motherfucking owner of the towers".
Don't hold back ... give us all the details! Your time starts...now.
Without researching the issue again (so I'm not 100% sure about the details), the dude who owned the tower complex updated the insurance policy on the towers just a couple of weeks before the attacks. He had the insurance contract modified to specifically cover terrorism, and he had some clause where the two individual attacks were counted as two separate instances of terrorism, which allowed him to get reimbursed the full value of the towers TWO TIMES OVER. That's right - they paid him double the value of the complex because of the two separate instances of terrorism. I think the total settlement was a couple of trillion bucks or something like that.
911 - World Trade Center 7 - Happy as Larry "Pull-it" (Silverstein)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_kaU5MtpHYo
Perhaps you do not want to view the other videos about WTC7, where firemen discussed its massive damage, raging fires, bulging side, lean, and the likelihood that it was going to tumble. You also may not want to view the few videos taken from the south side of the building, where the fires and massive damage are clearly visible, nor videos of the North Tower collapse which shows the extent of the debris that struck WTC7 and set it ablaze. It is probably better that you continue to only view the videos taken from the north, cameras set up by news stations and networks who had been informed that the structure was in danger of collapse, cameras set up specifically because the networks wanted to capture footage in the event the firemen's opinions were born out.
The videos---of the damage, of interviews were fire officials, and of networks (including CNN) who reported that fire officials expected that building to come down, too---are all out there. Seek them out if you truly are in search of "truth". Avoid them if you are perfectly comfortable with your literally one-sided (from the north) view.
The perfect symmetery of the collapse of WTC7 into it's own foot print, at free fall speed, and the pyroclastic flow of pulverized concrete puts a lie to all your bullshit.
...................................................................
A very short clip that has the audio of explosions going off at WTC 7 before it collapses. It surprises a group of firemen long after the Twin Towers already came down.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0YvrKfWkxdw
......................................................................
If you want to continue to be a 9/11MORON, to aid and abet in treason and murder; go on over to Smokey(Jim)Quinn's blog where your kind are most welcome to spout forth endless streams of stupidity*.
*Without your inflated ego and your obvious cognitive dissonannce blurring the process, try The Scientific Method: a body of techniques for investigating phenomena, acquiring new knowledge, or correcting and integrating previous knowledge.
.........................................................................
"Thank you for outing yourself as a sockpuppet! It helps us greatly to differentiate between the traitors and the mere uninformed simpletons when making up the list for the guillotine." i-dog.
Yes, by all means let’s squelch debate, and then label anyone and everyone who has reviewed the facts and come up with an opposing view “a paid troll” or a “sock puppet”. I guess everyone should quote mine, and edit video footage so that “inconvenient truths” don’t come up (e.g., southside views of WTC7, firemen comments about creaking and bulges and roaring fires, CNN and other network coverage where they state that WTC7 was on fire from the time it was struck by debris from the North Tower and that firefighters expected it, too, to fall---which is why they all trained cameras on it from the only vantage point authorities allowed them to access, which was from the north). Let's use bold letters to write things like perfect symetry, and ignore the fact that the north facade of WTC7 fell toward the south and ended up atop much of the debris from WTC7 and the North Tower, making it neither perfect nor symetrical. I guess we should all pretend we know science AND demolition and state categorically that the towers fell at freefall speed, and simply ignore debris that fell faster than the “freefalling” buildings. I guess we should also just plain lie and say things like “no aircraft debris from Flight 93”, when in fact 95% of the aircraft was recovered, along with remains identifying all passengers, and many charred but readable personal items such as Driver’s Licenses, etc. Maybe we can speak dismissively about "the miracle passport" and ignore the fact that hundreds of other personal items from both passengers on the aircraft and from folks inside the towers were recovered both near the site and after sifting through the debris out on Staten Island. If we are racist, we can claim that "no Jews died on 911", when in fact Jewish people were killed in a percentage GREATER than their representation in the overall US population. I guess we should spit in the faces of victims’ families and say they never actually got phone calls because “calls were impossible”, even though the Airphones worked perfectly well, and in rural areas cellphones quite often work as the signal can go quite high, and that the 2 out of 64 phone calls made from the planes that were on cellphones were made at a height of 2000 feet. Apparently those heart-wrenching goodbye calls were figments of the surviving families’ imagination? Tell that to them to their face, a-hole. I guess we should claim, too, that NORAD was “told to stand down”, when in fact it was not told anything of the sort and NORAD’s job was monitoring incoming aircraft, not domestic aircraft (look up ADIZ, especially pre-911 ADIZ), and that the oft cited claim about "that golfer" is ludicrous because while that private jet was in fact located, it took 45 minutes to find it on its filed IFR flight plan. There’s more, but why bother.
I have read a number of your rambling insanities over the time you have been here, and I can state as fact that you don't know diddly about much of anything. In fact it is fun for me to say this: You have no idea how the world really works, though your inflated ego makes you think otherwise. Perhaps you can petition Tyler to have me banned for the crime of being rational. It seems such a thing as rationality has less and less a place around here, and the drone of the pathetic and paranoid shut-in losers, having found the support group sane society cannot provide for them, wants to make the environment “pure” and monotone. Fine. Do it. I'll beat you to it and ban myself. And your guillotine to use on the "traitors vs. the mere uninformed simpletons"? Fuck off you impotent piece of shit.
Can I have some of that stuff you're smoking, Chindit13?
now now, you should be angry at physics not people who comment. Your argument and physics don't get along. You argue the asymetrical damage of the shortest building 7 and ignore the symetric of the 100+ story neighbors. And I guess you consider the video footage of 7 asymetrical when actual demoliton experts from europe believe it looks exactly like controlled demolition (along with any one else watching). This leaves out of course the BBC pulling their tape which announces its fall fifteen minutes early and other witnesses who were instructed to clear the building because it was coming down.
45 mins for a golfer and... how long exactly for these airliners? Speaking of other planes in the air, how about all those amazingly coincidental exercies that day? Remind us how many there were and what they were simulating? Please explain who coordinated those exercises. Please also explain the bizzare (read dishonest) statements from the Secretary of State claiming that no one could have anticipated this type of attack when so much evidence and state action contradicts her. And who called that California politician and told him not to fly that day?
The glowing molten steel for how many days? Speaking of firemen (and their credibility), how many heard explosions that "sounded like bombs going off in the building?"...and they're firemen so it's kind of silly to say they don't know the difference between that sound and the sound of a building collapsing by fire...and they heard them in the basement...and they heard them very early in the game. As I'm sure you're aware, there are interviews detailing this on YouTube and elsewhere. ANd firemen weren't the only ones who heard explosions. There were also many statments describing the explosions which the government kept from disclosing for a long time ( a lot like the pentagon videos - which remain undisclosed)
To quote you: "there's more but why bother?"
ChinShit + SmokeyQuinn ... two peas in a rotten pod.
Morons who believe in Magic Bullets!
Ignorance is Strength
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yuC_4mGTs98&feature=player_embedded