This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

Our Country Is Being Fracked by the Merger of Government and Big Business

George Washington's picture




 

The Government Is Using Its Police Powers to Protect Fracking

Fracking is polluting water all over the country. A new study published in the journal Ground Water predicts that the highly-toxic fluids used in fracking can migrate to aquifers within a few short years.

The government has officially stated that fracking can cause earthquakes. And see this. Some fracking companies now admit this fact.

And yet a new law passed in Pennsylvania will allow doctors to access information about chemicals used in hydraulic fracturing, but will restrict them from sharing that information with their patients. See the writeups by Mother Jones and Truthout.

The director of the Emmy-award winning documentary on fracking – Gasland – was arrested for attempting to film a Congressional hearing on fracking.

Actor Mark Ruffalo was put on terror watch list after he organized showings of Gasland.

The Washington Post reported in March that the FBI is investigating anti-fracking activists as potential terrorists.

The state of Pennsylvania hired an Israeli-American company with extensive military and intelligence ties to put out “terror” alerts. The company – ITRR – describes itself as:

The preeminent Israeli/American security firm providing training, intelligence and education to clients across the globe.

ITRR explains:

The Institute of Terrorism Research and Response’s research and analysis center, known as the Targeted Actionable Monitoring Center (TAM-C), is located in Israel. The Targeted Actionable Monitoring Center is staffed with former law enforcement, military, and intelligence professionals experienced in the production and utilization of intelligence products.

ITRR considered opponents of fracking to be potential terrorists.

Fracking companies are also using military psychological operations techniques to discredit opponents (and see this).

Not Just Fracking … Government Using “National Security” Powers to Protect All Big Business

The above is not unique, but part of a trend of using national security laws to protect big companies (more).  As just a few of many examples:

  • As the ACLU notes, Fusion Centers – a hybrid of military, intelligence agency, police and private corporations set up in centers throughout the country, and run by the Department of Justice and Department of Homeland Security – allow big businesses like Boeing to get access to classified information which gives them an unfair advantage over smaller competitors

One of the best definitions of fascism – the one used by Mussolini himself – is the “merger of state and corporate power“.

We’re pretty much there …

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Fri, 05/04/2012 - 02:13 | 2395953 tony bonn
tony bonn's picture

as i have said before, the largest and uncontested terrorist organization in the world is the united states government.

we will have to endure 15 more years of this wickedness. money is indeed the root of all evil.

Thu, 05/03/2012 - 21:22 | 2395622 waterhorse
waterhorse's picture

Great article, George.  I always enjoy reading your stuff.  I'm a recently awakened "sheeple" grandmother of 3 - I'm no longer in the flock - lol.  Daily I read about these nefarious, twisted, sociopathic types that are "running" our country.  There are so few of them and so many of "us" (the 'little people').  The big question is:  How the hell do we get THEM out?  What do we do?  I'm sure I'm going to end up on the TSA or "Patriot (ralph!) Act" or  NDAA list soon.

P.S.  Why do THEY keep calling these heinous totalitarian acts things like "Patriot" or "Homeland" when there is nothing patriotic or ringing of "home" about them?  That alone is very offensive; even Goebells would be rolling over in his grave at the clumsy propaganda attempts, but the sheeple keep lapping up the Brawndo.  Aye carumba!

Thu, 05/03/2012 - 21:19 | 2395606 Reptil
Reptil's picture

check yourself: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9tUapxt5LV8

after the radiation shower coverup of Fukushima, nothing surprises me anymore.

pretty much there yes.

Russian propaganda freaking out about "missile shield", no where in any news:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uq9cMukLMT8

internet shutdown in 3, 2, 1, ....

0__o

Thu, 05/03/2012 - 20:59 | 2395586 The Alarmist
The Alarmist's picture

We're fast approaching the day when it will be easier and faster to publish the ten thousand or so names who are not terrorists, except that that list will be an official state secret.

Thu, 05/03/2012 - 21:14 | 2395608 Reptil
Reptil's picture

TSA PrevTM

Thu, 05/03/2012 - 20:45 | 2395564 Bansters-in-my-...
Bansters-in-my- feces's picture

The goverment is NOT your friend.

 

Thu, 05/03/2012 - 20:58 | 2395583 hornster
hornster's picture

If I ever make it to OWS I'd have a poster;

 

USA

A Nation

Not A Corporation

Thu, 05/03/2012 - 21:40 | 2395654 waterhorse
waterhorse's picture

Mine will be:  Sick of Taxpayer-Funded Bailouts to Banksters:  24 Trillion and counting!

Thu, 05/03/2012 - 20:41 | 2395559 Kina
Kina's picture

I don't know why many of these drillers are using old style water and propant fracing when they can now use gas fracing that leaves zero residue, zero contanminants.

 

They pump down a Gas Gel, use sand as propant, the gas gel exapands into gas, facks and all the gas is retrieved at the surface for either reuse or selling as LPG.

The process is meant to be more productive, and cheaper to operate. No need to look for a water supply at all.

They dont have to use water or use stuff that pollutes.

Gasfrac is one company that does this stuff ( i think its their technology)

http://www.gasfrac.com/

 

 

Thu, 05/03/2012 - 20:17 | 2395534 TooBearish
TooBearish's picture

O for gawds sake - its been going on for a generation - GW change ur handle to Rip Van Winkle - the dood who just woke up. fukking helll....

Thu, 05/03/2012 - 19:28 | 2395465 Stuck on Zero
Stuck on Zero's picture

The Constitution was all about "individual rights."  Our current form of government is all about "group rights."  You are nothing without a group such as a union, corporation, or government badge.  The Fathers of this nation would be dismayed.

Thu, 05/03/2012 - 20:10 | 2395529 nmewn
nmewn's picture

"Our current form of government is all about "group rights." 

Preach it brutha.

Firefighter against taxpayer...black against white...woman against man...rich against poor...identity & class warfare. Not enough is said about this.

If someone/something were trying to set the people of the country against each other, what would they do different from what is being done now?

Thu, 05/03/2012 - 19:00 | 2395441 bankruptcylawyer
bankruptcylawyer's picture

Fracking is way overblown as a problem, and fractivism is funded by coal companies who are the biggest financial victims of natural gas electric generation.
For the first time ever coal is below 50 percent if our electrical source energy.

Thank you hydraulic fracking for keeping our air clean and our mountaintops and forested surfaces free from minestripping.

Fractivists are unwittinggly doing the bidding of big coal

Thu, 05/03/2012 - 19:43 | 2395484 notadouche
notadouche's picture

You got that right and big coal is all about union while oil and gas have no union involvement.  Given that, you tell me which industry this govt will protect.  The farce that is "clean coal" is one of the biggest fruads ever perpetrated onto the public.  Yet somehow no one even discusses the lie of "clean coal" and in fact Obama himself has even touted "clean coal".  

Thu, 05/03/2012 - 18:32 | 2395398 Fox-Scully
Fox-Scully's picture

George!  "Is being" should be changed to "has been"

Thu, 05/03/2012 - 18:14 | 2395356 New_Meat
New_Meat's picture

GW: I've twigged you on this to the point that you dismissed me. and fu

But this is your realm and I'm glad you are finally in this zone. and un-fu

You should be doing a whole lotta' more, like the continuing GE <--> .gov intercourse (only an example: since GE Capital is still BK, but there are so many examples)

Pray continue!

- Ned

Thu, 05/03/2012 - 18:31 | 2395399 NotApplicable
NotApplicable's picture

Yeah, it really means something when hard-core statists critique the state. I rank it right up there with battered-spouse syndrome.

"But, he loves me! He'd didn't mean to hurt me! He said he was sorry, and would never do it again!"

Thu, 05/03/2012 - 18:10 | 2395345 Chartist
Chartist's picture

so what?  People are not a going concern, but companies are!

Thu, 05/03/2012 - 18:08 | 2395339 dolly madison
dolly madison's picture
The best solution I can see to our problem of fascism is to add participatory democracy to our system. Give the people the powers to vote on issues, recall corrupt politicians and veto legislation, and it will help a great deal. Of course, the people in power will not just let us add these powers to the people, so things must get much worse before we will be able to get anything like this. Just tuck the idea in your hat in case it may come in handy some day.

Switzerland added participatory democracy to their system (which was a federal system like ours) at the time of the industrial revolution to keep the industrialists from controlling their government. California added participatory democracy to their government to combat the railroads controlling their government. Iceland used participatory democracy to be the only country that opted out of bailing out their banks. It's not perfect (but what is) because the private prison system still has its claws in California, but it helps.

For those who think that participatory democracy would have people voting to give themselves stuff, it is overwhelmingly used to take power away from government and corporations.  It is the representatives that do the giveaways to get votes.  California used an initiative to control the growth of property taxes and to allow medical marijuana, and upcoming ballot measures will have Californians voting on legalizing marijuana and on requiring the labeling of GMO foods. 

Thu, 05/03/2012 - 21:36 | 2395649 waterhorse
waterhorse's picture

Thank you, Dolly.  I like it.  I really wish we would go Iceland on the banksters.  Would love to see that happen.

Thu, 05/03/2012 - 18:28 | 2395392 NotApplicable
NotApplicable's picture

The best solution is for all of you busybodies to start minding your own damn business for a change, instead of empowering evil under the guise of minding everyone else's (in this case, in the form of "participatory democracy").

Your solution is nothing but mob rule, and can never mature beyond that non-thinking limitation.

Why? Because only individuals are capable of reasoning, empathy and all other human traits necessary to successfully govern anything.

Tell me, just how many laws do you need in order to make you a good person?

Fri, 05/04/2012 - 07:43 | 2396138 GeneMarchbanks
GeneMarchbanks's picture

'Tell me, just how many laws do you need in order to make you a good person?'

That's nothing new, many examples of failing societies attempting to legislate morality in the final phase of decay.

What does minding your own business entail exactly? Self interest? The strange perversion of logic is too ingrained in the mythology of capitalism and the industrial mindset to reverse now, I have no illusions about that.

Mob rule? That is what you have now. Corporations are the foremost example of mob rule. Self interest without personal responsibility. The premise is collectivism is a problem, the stressing of individual choice, but only applied to government somehow never corporations.

 

Thu, 05/03/2012 - 22:00 | 2395691 dolly madison
dolly madison's picture

The best solution is for all of you busybodies to start minding your own damn business for a change, instead of empowering evil under the guise of minding everyone else's (in this case, in the form of "participatory democracy").

Three of the 4 examples of participatory democracy I gave were examples of it stopping the busybodies or reducing the power of government.  It could be used to effectively veto NDAA.  It is another check and balance, and a very needed one.

The original system of government in the US morphed into what it is now naturally.  It was destined to come to this.  It was missing the veto of the many.  If we only got a new leader like Ron Paul, and he did manage to get our government back to what it once was, it would only morph to this again over time.  Without the veto of the people it will always end up back here with the government and the elite joining together giving each other favors over the people. 

Your solution is nothing but mob rule, and can never mature beyond that non-thinking limitation.

Why? Because only individuals are capable of reasoning, empathy and all other human traits necessary to successfully govern anything.

Yes, individuals are capable of reasoning, empathy etc. which is why we are capable of voting on issues, not just on representatives, and I think we'd be best at vetoing evil laws like NDAA.

Tell me, just how many laws do you need in order to make you a good person?

There are no number of laws that make a good person.

You totally aren't getting that participatory democracy is more a way to make less laws than it is a way to make more laws.  Making marijuana legal is effectively getting rid of laws, not making new laws.  Controlling the state from taking as much property tax takes power from the government, does not give it more.  Give it some more thought to see what the people might be able to accomplish if they could just veto laws that congress writes.  I'd be happy if we only got the power of referendum (that's where we can effectively veto laws) and the power of recall.  Initiative (the power to write new laws) is the least important power to get, but it has it's place as that is the power we used to control the growth of property taxes in California.

Thu, 05/03/2012 - 21:28 | 2395628 smb12321
smb12321's picture

It's amazing how many so-called lovers of liberty are the first to propose authoritarian solutions.  GW is one of the worst defenders coming as he does from the Left.  Hardly a single article is without a "the government could force" or "the government should..."

You are right.  All that "participatory democracy" does is increase the politicalization of life (as if our lives could be more saturated with politics). Until recently, professional activists were not needed because people were too busy making money, raising families and trying to improve the next generation.  It seems we've traded in common sense for group politics and pressure groups.

Thu, 05/03/2012 - 22:11 | 2395711 dolly madison
dolly madison's picture

You are right.  All that "participatory democracy" does is increase the politicalization of life (as if our lives could be more saturated with politics). Until recently, professional activists were not needed because people were too busy making money, raising families and trying to improve the next generation. 

The thing is that freedom isn't free.  If we don't pay attention, the government grows and causes us more problems.  The founding fathers only solution to this was revolution.  Participatory democracy added to our system is a way to beat back the growth of government a little bit all the time.

Thu, 05/03/2012 - 17:39 | 2395284 lolmao500
lolmao500's picture

Well duh. America is a fascist state... who would have known?? At least guns are flying off the shelves.

Thu, 05/03/2012 - 17:41 | 2395282 ebworthen
ebworthen's picture

Vote at your nearest polling station by making deposits at Chase, Wells Fargo, Citi, Bank of America.

Make your voice heard by having your savings and pension digitally secured by Fidelity, TIAA-CREF, CALPERS, Goldman Sachs, and the rest of the Wall Street Congress and remember; your assets are as safe and secure as MF Global client money.

Every tax dollar you contribute to the Treasury Department is guarded by Timothy Geithner, and promptly lent to big banks via the FED back door at 0.05% - to be lent to you at 5%-29% - so be assured you are being "counted".

Your allegiance to this fine nation ensures the slavery of Chinese citizens and low wages to Asian workers in general, and a guarantee that you will have part time, low wage, non-benefit eligible employment in perpetuity selling insurance, greasy over salted food, or trinkets made in China.  If you don't like it volunteer to serve in a war somewhere for some reason.  If you are too old greeters needed at WalMart.

Your State Attorney Generals are vigilantly defending your property rights by accepting a cash settlement for robot signed documents; assisted by the Supreme Court ruling in KELO decision that the State really owns your property anyway so be thankful.

Thu, 05/03/2012 - 21:34 | 2395638 waterhorse
waterhorse's picture

Excellent.  Just one suggestion:  "genetically-modified" greasy oversalted food, ala Monsanto.

Thu, 05/03/2012 - 17:17 | 2395241 Bennie Noakes
Bennie Noakes's picture

One of the best definitions of fascism – the one used by Mussolini himself – is the “merger of state and corporate power“.

Under Hitler and Mussolini, the corporations became extensions of the state.

What we have in the US now is slightly different: the state has become an extension of the corporations.

Thu, 05/03/2012 - 22:06 | 2395701 brettd
brettd's picture

Your premise is supported by looking

at the waivers "granted" to Obamacare.

Thu, 05/03/2012 - 19:50 | 2395501 Milton Waddams
Milton Waddams's picture

"One of the best definitions of fascism – the one used by Mussolini himself – is the “merger of state and corporate power“."

Funny I was just digging around in Federal Reserve historical documents and ran across this Congressional Testimony from then acting Fed Chairman William Mcchesney Martin:

Mr. MARTIN. We have complete control of the earning assets of the System. The important contribution, really, of Congress in creating the Federal Reserve Act is in the use of the word "System." It effected a merging of public and private interests in a trusteeship of the people's money under the Federal Reserve Act, which has worked effectively. The System is a human institution and from time to time perhaps changes should be made in it. We don't hold ourselves forth as perfect. But the important thing is t h at the Federal Reserve Act has attempted to merge into a System, representation—not control—of all the people concerned.

On a different note, from the same document, I found this part from Wright Patman, the Ron Paul of the times, illuminating:

Mr. PATMAN. Yes, s i r; t h at is r ight. T h at is my interpretation. Now, about these open-market operations, in practice and effect it is the same as the New York Federal Keserve Bank sending a truck down to the Bureau of Engraving and P r i n t i ng and getting a million dollars' worth of Federal Keserve notes, when they get back to New York, and exchanging them for a million dollars' worth of Government securities t h at draw interest, and then they will distribute this million dollars? worth of Government securities to the 12 banks in proportion to their size, and the banks will hold those Government securities and draw interest when the interest is due. It is a case of exchanging one Government obligation t h at doesn't cost them a penny—they create it, t h at is what the Federal Eeserve is for, to create money—and they create it out of the thin air, they get this out of the truck and exchange it for a million dollars' worth of Government bonds and they will keep the bonds and draw interest. That is, in effect, what they do in practice. They just give credit on the books of the banks, and then if people want the Federal Eeserve notes, call for them, of course, they are paid out. It is all the same t h i ng in the end, but in practice it is done through the bookkeeping operations. Now, the reason I say this bill is wrong is the Federal Open Market Committee should not have a thing to do with it. This is a Government operation, to relieve an emergency, and it should be done by the board of governors composed of seven members here in Washington, and the Treasury Department, here in Washington. It should not go through the Federal Eeserve Bank of New York at all. They should have no connection with it whatsoever. They should not have any power of decision over it. It is a matter within the Government, here in Washington, D. C. Now up there, if you say it should go through the Open Market Committee, you are saying t h at Mr. Sproul, who is not selected by the Government, in the sense t h at a public official is to perform a public duty, he is selected by the private banks of the New York district. He is put in t h at job as president of the Federal Eeserve Bank, and he selects the very man in his bank who performs this operation, supposedly for the Government, and t h at man is not paid by the Government. He is paid by the Federal Eeserve Bank of New York, and Mr. Sproul is paid by the Federal Eeserve Bank of New York. He is not paid by the Government either. I think if we permit this to go on, we are just permitting the New York bankers to, in effect, have too much power and control over our monetary system. The power to make money easy or to make it dear, and I think we ought to change this bill and p ut this pa r t i cul ar E ower solely under the Board of Governors here in Washington, D. C, and leave the Open Market Committee out of it.

DIRECT PURCHASES OF UNITED STATES OBLIGATIONS - http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/docs/historical/house/1956hr_directpurchase.pdf

Thu, 05/03/2012 - 18:21 | 2395375 NotApplicable
NotApplicable's picture

The only difference I see is that it's less honest upon the surface. It's still the EXACT same people in charge, with the exact same results.

Thu, 05/03/2012 - 17:26 | 2395261 Rainman
Rainman's picture

Well played. It is Fabian Socialism of which you speak, often mistaken for straight up Fascism.

 

 http://www.forbes.com/2008/11/03/obama-fabian-socialist-oped-cx_jb_1103bowyer.html

Thu, 05/03/2012 - 21:23 | 2395619 Reptil
Reptil's picture

ugh Forbes? really?

Socialist? Obama member of CFR.
Search "Rhodes Society".

nothing socialist about that.

Thu, 05/03/2012 - 21:27 | 2395629 nmewn
nmewn's picture

These days, an elite socialist is just a another way to enrich oneself at everyone elses expense.

Oh wait, its always been that way ;-)

Thu, 05/03/2012 - 19:05 | 2395444 nmewn
nmewn's picture

+1 Rainman, on the comment & the link.

The social elites have traded in the "world wide violent revolution" blather...for the soft bigotry of lowered expectations for all...still with the mindset of them controlling it all from the top down...instead of from down up.

Thu, 05/03/2012 - 22:08 | 2395672 brettd
brettd's picture

Did you see's Bowyer's bio blurb at the end?

"...guest on CNBC..."

See him there lately?

 

Thu, 05/03/2012 - 21:34 | 2395643 smb12321
smb12321's picture

So true.   We've had a true sea change in perceptions and aspirations.  No longer do folks want to "get rich", to "have the life of Mr. Big with the Cadillac and large home."  In fact, wealth derived from work is demonized (Hollywood idiots, athletes and lottery winners are OK for some reason). Worst are the expectations.  Who talk about getting ahead anymore?  It's all keeping up with nextdoor neighbor and if you have a job well by god you should feel lucky and vote for BO.  I fear we are raising a whole generation with a European viewpoint, ie.  the goal is not to get ahead but to get by. 

Thu, 05/03/2012 - 17:11 | 2395223 bank guy in Brussels
bank guy in Brussels's picture

Regarding that word 'fascism' -

Classic 1930s 'fascism' as under Franco, often involved some degree of a labour policy supporting workers and their families who kept their mouths shut. No political freedom, but workers often had some job and income security.

In Spain now, some people are even talking about wanting to restore some Franco-era labour policies.

But the modern kind of American fascism is of a different, even worse type, with just raw cruelty and abandonment of working people. There is security for the oligarchs, anguish and fear for the commoners - Not far from 'eat dirt and be slaves, or die, or both'.

Maybe a different word is needed for the modern US-style crony corporate tyranny.

Fri, 05/04/2012 - 05:49 | 2396064 Ghordius
Ghordius's picture

I agree, the thing is that Mussolini coined the term, but he included worker representation to the term "corporations". The idea was that all partners in production have a say, usually (badly) organized in chambers where both owners and workers were represented and were allowed to have their (moderate and garded) say on matters, under the watchful eye of the state.

Add then the typical fascist spending for families, including low-rent housing projects and special jobs for widows and orphans and you'll see that Mussolini and Franco had nothing to compare what is described above.

The modern kind of American fascism is unique in the sense that private corporation's management is all-powerful and can spend huge amounts on lobbyists and Super-PACs, followed by a smaller say on the part of the shareholders (who have some opportunities if rich enough) and then, at last, the worker drones are allowed to get some medical benefits if they don't get thrown out...

Have you ever wondered why American Corporations are so keen on giving medical benefits? Have you ever wondered why the "Police State" has such a big private involvement, for example in prisons?

It's all the Cult of the American Corporation...

Thu, 05/03/2012 - 18:18 | 2395368 NotApplicable
NotApplicable's picture

I'd say that the main difference was back then there was far more productive capacity so it wasn't that hard to keep the workers supported, to a degree. Today? It's long gone, having been traded to the Chinese for a paper tiger that can only support the paper-pushing industry.

Thu, 05/03/2012 - 17:08 | 2395213 Benjamin Glutton
Benjamin Glutton's picture

9/11 enabled our current open version of 2 party fascism. our central government's survival imperative will never allow us to turn back. sad really.

 

Thanks once again ZH, George and posters for fearless truth.

Thu, 05/03/2012 - 17:44 | 2395292 12ToothAssassin
12ToothAssassin's picture

Lucky for them 9/11 happened huh?

Thu, 05/03/2012 - 18:21 | 2395369 Benjamin Glutton
Benjamin Glutton's picture

that is just sick. the point of reference for accelerated fascism is undeniable. 9/11 did not alter my trust in Americans in general and I do not support our Constitutional drift or its premise. jmho.

 

Daniel Ray Carter and Robert McCoy were deputies in the Hampton, Virginia sheriff’s office. Were, that is, until they made the mistake of “liking” their boss’ opponent’s Facebook page during a contested sheriff election. They were both fired shortly after their boss won reelection.

As government employees, Carter and McCoy are protected by the First Amendment. Nevertheless, a federal judge in Virginia denied their claim that they were unconstitutionally fired for expressing their political view on the unusual theory that “liking” a Facebook page does not constitute a form of expression protected by the First Amendment:

It is the Court’s conclusion that merely “liking” a Facebook page is insufficient to merit constitutional protection. In cases where courts have found that constitutional speech protections extended to Facebook posts, actual statements existed within the record. . . . These illustrative cases differ markedly from the case at hand in one crucial way: Both [precedents] involved actual statements. No such statements exist in this case. Simply liking a Facebook page is insufficient. It is not the kind of substantive statement that has previously warranted constitutional protection. The Court will not attempt to infer the actual content of Carter’s posts from one click of a button on Adams’ Facebook page. For the Court to assume that the Plaintiffs made some specific statement without evidence of such statements is improper. Facebook posts can be considered matters of public concern; however, the Court does not believe Plaintiffs Carter and McCoy have alleged sufficient speech to garner First Amendment protection.

 

I did not junk you. you junked yourself,imo.

 

 

Thu, 05/03/2012 - 21:57 | 2395684 brettd
brettd's picture

Does the judge have a name?

Need to know who they are, 

their history, friends and family---for starters.

In politics, its called "opposition research".

Thu, 05/03/2012 - 17:07 | 2395208 hedgeless_horseman
hedgeless_horseman's picture

 

 

If one is not on the terrorist watch list at this point, then one is not trying very hard.

 

Thu, 05/03/2012 - 17:07 | 2395207 Vince Clortho
Vince Clortho's picture

It's about time these mutha frackers got the frack outa Dodge

Thu, 05/03/2012 - 17:05 | 2395202 DaveyJones
DaveyJones's picture

I was thinking of another verb that sounds similar

Thu, 05/03/2012 - 17:02 | 2395196 lakecity55
lakecity55's picture

Dude, we are all being Fracked by Vladimir Stalin Trotsky, aka Bo-Rack Hus-sein O'Bama.

 

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!