This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

“Confiscate, Secretly and Unobserved”

testosteronepit's picture




 

Wolf Richter   www.testosteronepit.com

“Lenin is said to have declared that the best way to destroy the capitalist system was to debauch the currency. By a continuing process of inflation, governments can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens. By this method they not only confiscate, but they confiscate arbitrarily; and, while the process impoverishes many, it actually enriches some.”

John Maynard Keynes penned these words after World War I (The Economic Consequences of the Peace); and all Fed governors, certainly Chairman Ben Bernanke, should be required to read them out loud each morning.

When inflation isn’t particularly hot, it’s praised as something desirable, though in its gradual, nearly invisible way it continues its insidious work. And the inflation data released today (BLS PDF) fall into that category: flat for the month and up 2.3% over the last 12 month. It will trigger palliative lingo such as “moderate” or “well anchored,” and any spikes would be “temporary.” But spikes in inflation, along with moderate, well-anchored, and temporary inflation, unless followed by deflation, become permanent. Result: a CPI-U index value of 230.085, where “100” represents price levels of 1982-84. Hence, 130% inflation over the last 30 years. In the process, the Fed “debauched” the dollar, to use Keynes’ term, by 56.5%. 

CPI without food and energy was up .2% for the month and 2.3% for the year. While again in the soothing category of “moderate,” it shows a pernicious trend: the consistent rise in core inflation, part of it imported from China and other countries:

 

 

Energy was a mixed bag: overall -1.7% for the month and +.9% for the year. Gasoline, which finally dropped 2.6%, was the hot topic. But there was one item that will soon contribute to inflation: utility gas services (natural gas), -1.8% for the month and -11.6% for the year. After a long and steep decline, natural gas hit a 10-year low on April 19, of $1.91 per million Btu—far below production cost. The impact has been brutal, rig count is falling off a cliff, and production companies are reeling. It has been a massacre. Read.... Havoc and Opportunity in Natural Gas.

Healthcare costs are a perennial inflation nightmare. Medical care services rose .4% for the month and 3.7% for the year; health insurance jumped 1% for the month and 12.4% for the year. The industry appears to be immune to free-market price constraints. Over the last 30 years, medical inflation, according to a study by the Commonwealth Fund, was close to 700%. And healthcare costs have ballooned to over 17% of GDP. At about $8,000 per capita, healthcare eats up a significant part of a family’s income, either directly or indirectly, even if the family is securely ensconced in the middle-class.

And there are ... televisions! Symptom of the many quirks in the index. They dropped 19.6% for the year, continuing a decade-long decline that began when flat-panel TVs hit the market. Back then, if you wanted a 48-inch TV, you could choose between a CRT based TV for $450 or an amazing flat panel TV for around $7,000. The index picked up the new technology at the introductory price, and as that price collapsed, flat-panel TVs had a deflationary impact on CPI—though consumers ended up paying several times more than they'd paid for a TV before!

There are a few winners in an inflationary environment, as Keynes pointed out. It allows companies to show a sales increase. Aspiring or actual billionaires favor inflation because they no longer struggle with paying for tuition, healthcare, or retirement. They're in it for the game, and the game is to make more billions—and inflation speeds up the process. Debtors favor inflation, but only when central banks push yields below free market rates, thus blocking creditors from pricing inflation into the loan. And Congress, which refuses to live within its means, loves inflation; it’s the cowardly way of mitigating the consequences of endless budget deficits.

For the rest, inflation is an insidious hidden tax. There are no monthly statements or invoices. It quietly eats away at assets. It’s a nasty tax on wage earners whose wage increases haven’t kept up with inflation since the real-wage peak of 2000. And when combined with the Fed’s zero-interest-rate policy, inflation turns into financial repression. It hits savers, retirees, and pension funds. It pushes desperate people into Ponzi schemes. It punishes the prudent middle-class family that is trying to save for college or healthcare expenses. But banks and the government get money for free.

And so John Maynard Keynes continues his essay: “As the inflation proceeds..., all permanent relations between debtors and creditors, which form the ultimate foundation of capitalism, become so utterly disordered as to be almost meaningless; and the process of wealth-getting degenerates into a gamble and a lottery.” A gamble and a lottery, indeed! Read Chriss Street’s hard-hitting article.... The JP Morgan Fiasco: Higher Interest Rates Ahead.

And here is an awesome and biting cartoon by Ben Garrison: how banks and their political “legs” step on the little people on both ends of the political spectrum.

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Wed, 05/16/2012 - 09:14 | 2431081 Shizzmoney
Shizzmoney's picture

Well, big banks and other predatory creditors are big winners due to inflation....

............that is, of course, until they lay in the streets dead in their own pool of blood.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 09:05 | 2431048 AustrianEconomist
AustrianEconomist's picture

Check out the latest from the Capital Research Institute (CRI)

The Greek Dilemma

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 03:39 | 2430599 AnAnonymous
AnAnonymous's picture

You have to read quick and fast. Not paying attention.

Lenin said that the governments would be the recipients, therefore envisioning the end of capitalism.

So far, as the story develops, the governments are the recipients of future debt, the bag holders while private entities are the recipients of immediate debt, that is tangible wealth.

By Lenin's logics, this does not look like the demise of capitalism but the demise of government.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 12:40 | 2431822 Kayman
Kayman's picture

I'm counting on the demise of Chicom trolls. Lenin was a  German plant.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 03:45 | 2430607 TheFourthStooge-ing
TheFourthStooge-ing's picture

You're not staying in character. Your english is too polished and you didn't even mention US citizenism.

If you're a new member of the AnAnonymous troll squad, you need a little more practice.

Just trying to help.

 

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 08:00 | 2430869 Gully Foyle
Gully Foyle's picture

TheFourthStooge-ing

Was that one more obvious than Cognitive Dissonance is?

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 02:37 | 2430538 cranky-old-geezer
cranky-old-geezer's picture

 

 

Bernanke can't debase gold and silver (nor any other physical commodity) with his printing press.

That's all that really needs to be said.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 06:51 | 2430730 onebir
onebir's picture

If interest rates go up enough, do you think gold will levitate?

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 09:13 | 2431079 LawsofPhysics
LawsofPhysics's picture

If interest rates go up it's game fucking over.  However, ZIRP suggests that there is no cost associated with creating capital out of thin air without adding anything of real value to the system.  Common sense should tell you that this is immpossible and only leads to inflation.  This is the rock and hard place that all central banks and governments now find themselves stuck between.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 04:55 | 2430662 SilverRhino
SilverRhino's picture

They sure as hell are driving the price down as we speak.    No skin off my teeth.   That just puts it on sale for non-leveraged physical metals owners.

 

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 08:05 | 2430877 Gully Foyle
Gully Foyle's picture

SilverRhino

You do understand that at some point "they", TPTB, will pull the rug out from under the Gold market.

Thus forcing everyone who bought at x above the new normal into loss and frantic selling.

Then it will stabilize at the new much lower price to be purchased by TPTB gnomes.

It's like an old Buffalo hunt, drive them right over the cliff.


Wed, 05/16/2012 - 09:11 | 2431055 LawsofPhysics
LawsofPhysics's picture

Same as it ever was.  In the short term, yes.  Then gold will be "revalued" yet again.  Gold has remained a safe store of wealth for 6000 years and will continue to do so regardless of whether the system crashes or not, so fucking what.  Do you have a point Gully or are you just trolling again?  

My employees and I welcome a crash, we know that the products of our labor have real value.  Better hope you paper retains some value if you want to exchange it for some of our produce.  That is the only thing a troll like you should be concerned about.

 

As the silver Rhino points out non-leveraged positions don't have to "do" shit.  Good luck moving that buffalo.  The dollar-cost avergae of my gold is under $400 an ounce and I have almost no debt.  

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 11:46 | 2431660 Gully Foyle
Gully Foyle's picture

LawsofPhysics

Gold, and anything really, has remained a relative store of wealth.

FOFOA had a list which included, land, collector cars, wine, and art, as well as a few others I can't recall.

I would say that land is a better bang for the buck.

You can rent your land or farm it. Every crop you bring saves you money.

Land is more applied than gold.

It isn't like you can plant your gold and new gold arises from it.

Gold has always been the currency of the merchant class. Land of the working, the farmer and rancher those who can envision how to make the land work for them.

But people and crows enjoy shiny things.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 12:57 | 2431954 Boxed Merlot
Boxed Merlot's picture

According to John Locke, ”The state of nature has a law of nature to govern it, which obliges everyone: and reason which is that law, teaches all mankind who will but consult it, that being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty or possessions…“

Regarding Locke's writings on slavery, William Uzgalis at Oregon State writes "Slavery is the state of being in the absolute or arbitrary power of another. On Locke's definition of slavery there is only one rather remarkable way to become a legitimate slave. In order to do so one must be an unjust aggressor defeated in war. The just victor then has the option to either kill the aggressor or enslave them. Locke tells us that the state of slavery is the continuation of the state of war between a lawful conqueror and a captive, in which the conqueror delays to take the life of the captive, and instead makes use of him. This is a continued war because if conqueror and captive make some compact for obedience on the one side and limited power on the other, the state of slavery ceases. The reason that slavery ceases with the compact is that ”no man, can, by agreement pass over to another that which he hath not in himself, a power over his own life.“ 

 

I apologize for the lengthy cut and paste, but these are important philosophical issues that need to be continually addressed to maintain a civil rule of law and so prevent a reversion into anarchy.

 

imo.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 12:33 | 2431811 LawsofPhysics
LawsofPhysics's picture

As someone who oversees several thousand acres, I (for once) agree with your conclusions about land.  At least until the police state begins and the government takes control by force or civil unrest breaks out and hungry idiots jump your fences.   Don't think that can happen?  You don't know your history.

 

Moreover, land still has couterparty risk, as pointed out above.  Don't forget taxes either or all the other costs associated with maintaining that land in a productive fashion, and there are many.  What's the counterparty risk on PMs again?  think about that for a bit.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 13:05 | 2431994 Boxed Merlot
Boxed Merlot's picture

What's the counterparty risk on PMs again? think about that for a bit...

 

Depending on the hoard, location and security for starters.  Next would be the geopolitical climate of the times and place of the hoard.  In short, it comes down to the voluntary adherence to a set, uniform and enforced rule of law applied equally to all, the governing authorities as well as those so governed.

 

imo.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 02:07 | 2430515 ebworthen
ebworthen's picture

You would have to be Warren Buffet and never buy or cook anything for yourself to not recognize that we have inflation.

For someone who makes $150,000, a loaf of bread going from $2.00 to $3.00 is not a big deal; for someone making $15,000 a year it is a big deal.

The 1% and the inside the beltway/fantasy dome crowd have their heads in the clouds and can't see they are walking into a mine field. 

Ah well, such is history.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 12:28 | 2431801 Kayman
Kayman's picture

dup.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 12:27 | 2431797 Kayman
Kayman's picture

When the sphincter is firmly wrapped around the neck, calling it "heads in the clouds" is hardly descriptive.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 02:04 | 2430487 Revert_Back_to_...
Revert_Back_to_1792_Act's picture

Yay for quotes!  Here are a couple.

"While boasting of our noble deeds, we are careful to control the ugly fact that by an iniquitous money system, we have nationalized a system of oppression which, though more refined, is not less cruel than the old system of chattel slavery." - Horace Greely

"... Paper money will invariably operate in the body of politics as spirit liquors on the human body. They prey on the vitals and ultimately destroy them."
"Paper money has had the effect in your state that it will ever have, to ruin commerce, oppress the honest, and open the door to every species of fraud and injustice." (George Washington - letter to J. Bowen, Rhode Island, Jan. 9, 1787)

"Those few who can understand the system (check book money and credit) will either be so interested in its profits, or so dependent on it favors, that there will be little opposition from that class, while on the other hand, the great body of people mentally incapable of comprehending the tremendous advantage that capital derives from the system, will bear it burdens without complaint, and perhaps without even suspecting that the system is inimical to their interests." - unknown

Then there is Colonel House FTW;   See red print on this page;

http://www.gemworld.com/EdMandellHouse.htm

Newspaper article about him;

http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1918-12-15/ed-1/seq-31...

and finally, I am going to put this song because I like it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=netMRfWRTTY


Wed, 05/16/2012 - 01:43 | 2430474 Vlad Tepid
Vlad Tepid's picture

My question is when can I pay off my student loans with a single day's work...

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 03:40 | 2430600 AnAnonymous
AnAnonymous's picture

Dont forget: US citizen too.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 12:20 | 2431776 Kayman
Kayman's picture

Keynes an American ?  Whoda thunkit...

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 08:16 | 2430908 Bob
Bob's picture

A sense of humor!  +1

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 03:40 | 2430604 TheFourthStooge-ing
TheFourthStooge-ing's picture

...just like you.

 

Tue, 05/15/2012 - 23:16 | 2430205 world_debt_slave
world_debt_slave's picture

rust never sleeps

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 11:27 | 2431590 The Navigator
The Navigator's picture

termites also never sleep

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!