This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

Tick By Tick Research Comment - 13 Economic Tales To Take You Into 2013

Tick By Tick's picture





 

Dear All, 

 

As Bollinger question why their sales have dropped off a 'cliff' (excuse the pun), since London's LIBOR traders find themselves looking for a career change, the rest of the investment community continue to act with the confusion and irrationality that fuel the modern markets.  S&P 2000, 3000 or even 10 000 - seemingly anything has become possible as the powers that be finally commit to full debt monetisation to preserve the worlds over-leveraged, under-funded and wounded economy.   

 

 

"When dealing with people, remember you are not dealing with creatures of logic, but creatures of emotion"

 

Dale Carnegie

 

 

Despite all the doom and gloom, here at Tick By Tick, we are here to provide an air of rationality and guidance to help keep your feet on the ground . As a result, we feel obliged to provide you, the loyal reader, with a seasonal present of our own.  (Drumroll please).  I would like to present Tick By Tick's 13 Economic Tales to Take You Into 2013

 

 1.       Being long the US markets (SPX, NDAQ, DJIA and Russ 2K) vs. the PIIGS (PSI 20, MIB, ASE, ISEQ and IBEX) YTD would have only resulted in 14bps of outperformance (1206 bps vs. 1192 bps)

 

2.        When comparing Jan-Jun of 2011 vs. 2012 in terms of Futures trading volume, total volume has fallen 10.2%.  More interestingly, PM volume was up 32.8% vs. Equity Indices at -14.4% despite both essentially delivering no gains over the period

 

3.       Between 2007 and 2010, the US birth rate fell 8% to 63.2 births per  1000 women – this includes a 23% drop in the Mexican birth rate over the same period.  These new figures have seen the US fertility rate drop below population stagnation rate of 2.1 to 1.9 children

 

4.       Despite 10s of thousands of individuals reading the Gartman Letter on a daily basis, should you have invested in his Horizons ETF since its inception, you would be lagging the SPX by 50%

 

5.       The largest two Global brokerages (MS and GS) were 253 and 170 SPX points away from the current level of 1420 in their 2012 predictions.  Following their advice would have cost you 17.8% and 11.9% respectively

 

6.       If being married was a requirement of voting in the US Presidential election, Mitt Romney would have won 56-42.  Instead, due to the American demographic, Obama retained power due to the proportionately high unmarried population voting 62-35 in his favour.

 

7.       If the economies of the US and Chile were compiled into audited accounts, every fundamental investor would pick Chilean debt as comparatively better purchase.  Despite this, the 10yr yield spread is 372bps and US Treasury allocations are near historic highs

 

8.       Whilst John Paulson, founder of Paulson & Co, basked in the fame of making +600% during the last financial crisis. A relatively unknown individual named Andrew Lahde, founder of Lahde Capital Management, generated returns in excess of 1000% before closing his fund and using his 5 minutes of fame to remind the world of the idiocy that surrounds the global Hemp market

 

9.       Despite running a trade surplus, having a full funded pension liability and complete energy independence, investors prefer to hold the US dollar, which offers none of the above, over the Norwegian Krone that offers all of these characteristics

 

10.   On December 6th Apple lost $35bn in market capitalisation, that is 5.5x the total market capitalisation of Research in Motion who previously controlled 44.5% of the Smartphone market in 2008

 

11.   On May 4th 2012, Michael Pachter from Wedbush was the first bullish analyst on FB providing a $44 price target following the IPO.  Six months later on 6th November, FB traded at $22, exactly half of his target

 

12.   Those who believe that a cashless society is inevitable have been labelled conspiracy theorists, yet Mastercard, Visa and AMEX are up 120%, 150% and 33% over the last 2 years.

 

..     ...and finally

     

        13.  In the UK, houses with the number 13 are, on average, 2% cheaper than the identical houses either side of them 

 

Before we leave you to question the logic in the facts set out before you, as the founder of Tick By Tick, I would like issue a small apology to my loyal reader-base who have found Tick By Tick market comments absent from their inboxes for the last 6 months.  Big changes - that will be explained in my future insights -  are coming that will ensure this is a Black Swan event rather than the norm.

 

Thank you for the continued support and a Happy New Year to you all.

 

Best Regards

George Adcock 

 

Founder

www.tickbytick.co.uk

 #0000ff;"> 

Twitter: @TickByTick_Team

 

*All figures correct at time of writing

 


If you would like to receive weekly comment emails like this in the future, please send an email to team@tickbytick.co.uk with the words "add me" in the subject line.

 

All email addresses will be held with complete confidentiality and there is no profit motive in any piece of writing disseminated.

 


- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Thu, 01/03/2013 - 12:20 | Link to Comment Snakeeyes
Snakeeyes's picture

How about raising taxes and implementing government takeover of healthcare with a lousy housing market?

http://confoundedinterest.wordpress.com/2013/01/03/happy-new-year-mortga...

Thu, 01/03/2013 - 10:33 | Link to Comment Oldwood
Oldwood's picture

9. Despite running a trade surplus, having a full funded pension liability and complete energy independence, investors prefer to hold the US dollar, which offers none of the above, over the Norwegian Krone that offers all of these characteristics

Easy one. Gamblers don't like safety or they wouldn't gamble. The US economy is screwed so its all up from here, right? Gamblers going for the highest return over safety and we can't figure out why it crashes?

Thu, 01/03/2013 - 09:16 | Link to Comment Peter Pan
Peter Pan's picture

'The contribution by Adcock simply highlights what we already know,

1. Demographics do not improve during recessionary downturns and their effects continue to be felt.

2. Past performance is definitely no guarantee for future performance.

3. When things don't make sense (i.e. bond interest on US bonds v Norweigan bonds) then rest assured they are causing damage to the economic fabric of the nation.

4. Manipulation of the market is not just suspected it is also a given.

5. We are totally f.....ed

Thu, 01/03/2013 - 12:05 | Link to Comment tango
tango's picture

Demographics drive everything - from invention to buying to building to wealth.  Nations not growing are getting poorer by the minute.  Europe is the ultimate case in point.   Italy, Spain, Greece - even Germany - are caught in the old welfare state trap - fewer and fewer workers supporting a growing number of retirees who expect the full range of benefits promised in the good days.

Thu, 01/03/2013 - 09:06 | Link to Comment Setarcos
Setarcos's picture

Completely off topic, but as I can't see the point of this article (except fishing for customers), why not go off topic and maybe not too far, if investing in this and that is a point.

FarceBook was not mentioned, but am I the only one to notice that Google+ is making serious inroads in "social media", with a far better 'product' offering all sorts of opportunities, especially because of the YouTube tie-up.

Check Google+ to see what I'm on about.

Good thing?  Only time will tell, but I fancy that FarceBook is a very bad investment.

Thu, 01/03/2013 - 12:02 | Link to Comment tango
tango's picture

It's simply another point of view, something we desperately need. After all, if one had followed Tyler's advice over the last two years (the market is poised to collapse, will collapse, too dangerous, don't invest) then you would have missed large profits for the sake of ideology. 

When folks get ALL their news from one site without any conflicting views, the thinking and results are skewed.  Even Tyler (as shown by his posts) keeps up diligently with the likes of JP Morgan, Goldman and economists with differing views.  He has to since the vast majority of folks still hold utterly absurd economic ideas on debt, sustainability and saving.  

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!