This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
Homeland Security Agencies Wasted Money On Seminars Like “Did Jesus Die for Klingons Too?” & Training for a “Zombie Apocalypse”
While we are waiting to find out who carried out the Boston terror attack, it is worth reflecting on one important fact …
America’s anti-terrorism policies since 9/11 have been a dismal failure.
Why?
Wasted Homeland Security Funding
Initially, a large amount of the homeland security spending has been wasted … producing “a bunch of crap”.
For example, spending money on zombie apocalypse training or other silly programs is a bad investment which led to a false sense of security.
Spending defense money on a workshop called “Did Jesus die for Klingons too?” and DOD-run microbreweries is probably not helping stop terrorist attacks.
Moreover, using homeland security resources to spy on average Americans or crack down on peaceful protesters or government critics distracts from getting the actual bad guys.
If we had spent the money and deployed the resources on focused anti-terror efforts, we would be in a better position today.
Our Wars In the Middle East Have Created More Terrorists
Moreover, security experts – including both conservatives and liberals – agree that waging war in the Middle East weakens national security and increases terrorism. See this, this, this, this, this, this, this and this.
Ooops.
Killing innocent civilians is one of the main things which increases terrorism. As one of the top counter-terrorism experts (the former number 2 counter-terrorism expert at the State Department) told me, starting wars against states which do not pose an imminent threat to America’s national security increases the threat of terrorism because:
One of the principal causes of terrorism is injuries to people and families.
The Iraq war wasn’t even fought to combat terrorism. And Al Qaeda wasn’t even in Iraq until the U.S. invaded that country.
And top CIA officers say that drone strikes increase terrorism (and see this).
Furthermore, James K. Feldman – former professor of decision analysis and economics at the Air Force Institute of Technology and the School of Advanced Airpower Studies – and other experts say that foreign occupation is the main cause of terrorism
University of Chicago professor Robert A. Pape – who specializes in international security affairs – points out:
Extensive research into the causes of suicide terrorism proves Islam isn’t to blame — the root of the problem is foreign military occupations.
***
Each month, there are more suicide terrorists trying to kill Americans and their allies in Afghanistan, Iraq, and other Muslim countries than in all the years before 2001 combined.
***
New research provides strong evidence that suicide terrorism such as that of 9/11 is particularly sensitive to foreign military occupation, and not Islamic fundamentalism or any ideology independent of this crucial circumstance. Although this pattern began to emerge in the 1980s and 1990s, a wealth of new data presents a powerful picture.
More than 95 percent of all suicide attacks are in response to foreign occupation, according to extensive research [co-authored by James K. Feldman - former professor of decision analysis and economics at the Air Force Institute of Technology and the School of Advanced Airpower Studies] that we conducted at the University of Chicago’s Project on Security and Terrorism, where we examined every one of the over 2,200 suicide attacks across the world from 1980 to the present day. As the United States has occupied Afghanistan and Iraq, which have a combined population of about 60 million, total suicide attacks worldwide have risen dramatically — from about 300 from 1980 to 2003, to 1,800 from 2004 to 2009. Further, over 90 percent of suicide attacks worldwide are now anti-American. The vast majority of suicide terrorists hail from the local region threatened by foreign troops, which is why 90 percent of suicide attackers in Afghanistan are Afghans.
Israelis have their own narrative about terrorism, which holds that Arab fanatics seek to destroy the Jewish state because of what it is, not what it does. But since Israel withdrew its army from Lebanon in May 2000, there has not been a single Lebanese suicide attack. Similarly, since Israel withdrew from Gaza and large parts of the West Bank, Palestinian suicide attacks are down over 90 percent.
***
The first step is recognizing that occupations in the Muslim world don’t make Americans any safer — in fact, they are at the heart of the problem.
Our Program of Torture Created Terrorists
In addition, torture creates new terrorists:
- One of the top military interrogators said that torture by Americans of innocent Iraqis is the main reason that foreign fighters started fighting against Americans in Iraq in the first place (and see this).
- Former counter-terrorism czar Richard A. Clarke says that America’s indefinite detention without trial and abuse of prisoners is a leading Al Qaeda recruiting tool
- A former FBI interrogator — who interrogated Al Qaeda suspects — says categorically that torture actually turns people into terrorists
- A 30-year veteran of CIA’s operations directorate who rose to the most senior managerial ranks, says:
Torture creates more terrorists and fosters more acts of terror than it could possibly neutralize.
- A former US Air Force interrogator said that torture just creates more terrorists
- A former U.S. interrogator and counterintelligence agent, and Afghanistan veteran said, “Torture puts our troops in danger, torture makes our troops less safe, torture creates terrorists. It’s used so widely as a propaganda tool now in Afghanistan. All too often, detainees have pamphlets on them, depicting what happened at Guantanamo.”
- The Senate Armed Services Committee unanimously stated:
“The administration’s policies concerning [torture] and the resulting controversies … strengthened the hand of our enemies.”
- Two professors of political science have demonstrated that torture increases, rather than decreases, terrorism
- General Petraeus said that torture hurts our national security
- And the reporter who broke Iran-Contra and other stories says that torture actually helped Al Qaeda, by giving false leads to the U.S. which diverted its military, intelligence and economic resources into wild goose chases
So the widespread program of torture under the Bush administration didn’t help.
Nice Job Creating More Terrorists, You Morons …
Additionally – in the name of fighting our enemies – the U.S. has directly been supporting Al Qaeda and other terrorist groups for the last decade. See this, this, this, this and this.
Why Have We Given Up Our Rights If the Government Can’t Keep Us Safe?
We have given up the fundamental rights which make us American.
The government insisted that – if we gave up our liberties – it would keep us safe.
It has failed to do so, and has instead squandered our national treasure, our resources and our troops on efforts which have only increased the risk of terrorism.
Will the Boston Terror Attack Lead to Shredding of Our Liberties 2.0 ... And More War?
War is always sold by artificially demonizing the enemy. Countries need to lie about their enemies in order to demonize them sufficiently so that the people will support the war.
That is why intelligence “failures” – such as the following – are so common:
- The U.S. Navy’s own historians now say that the sinking of the USS Maine — the justification for America’s entry into the Spanish-American War — was probably caused by an internal explosion of coal, rather than an attack by the Spanish.
- It is also now well-accepted that the Gulf of Tonkin Incident which led to the Vietnam war was a fiction (confirmed here).
I am not saying that the Boston marathon was a false flag attack. I have no idea at this point who carried it out. What I am saying is that the Boston bombings will be used by the powers-that-be to further their own agenda.
Prominent Americans have noted for years that another terrorist attack could usher in martial law (we're already pretty close) ... and more war (we're in a lot already):
- Daniel Ellsberg, the famous Pentagon Papers whistleblower, said “if there is another terror attack, “I believe the president will get what he wants”, which will include a dictatorship
- Former National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski (who helped to create Al Qaeda to fight the soviets in Afghanistan) told the Senate that any terrorist act carried out in the U.S. might falsely be blamed on Iran to justify war against that nation
- President Carter recently impliedly acknowledged the same risk
- Former Senator Gary Hart warned Americans that the White House might use a “Gulf of Tonkin” or “remember the Maine” type incident to justify war against Iran (starting at 7:15 minutes)
- Ron Paul stated the government “is determined to have martial law”, and that the government is hoping to get the people “fearful enough that they will accept the man on the white horse”. Paul said last year (at 28:00):
What I fear the most is a false flag – something happening where one of our ships goes down, or there’s a plane that goes down, and of course it HAD to be the Iranians, you know, for sure, for certain
- General Tommy Franks stated that if another terrorist attack occurs in the United States “the Constitution will likely be discarded in favor of a military form of government”
- A retired 27-year CIA analyst who prepared and presented Presidential Daily Briefs and served as a high-level analyst for several presidents stated that if there was another major attack in the U.S., it would lead to martial law. He went on to say:
“We have to be careful, if somebody does this kind of provocation, big violent explosions of some kind, we have to not take the word of the masters there in Washington that this was some terrorist event because it could well be a provocation allowing them, or seemingly to allow them to get what they want.”
- Robert David Steele – a 20-year Marine Corps infantry and intelligence officer, the second-ranking civilian in U.S. Marine Corps Intelligence, and former CIA clandestine services case officer – says that elements within the U.S. government may use any terrorist attack as an excuse to blame Iran
- Former high-level CIA officer Michael Scheuer – who was the head of the CIA unit tasked with capturing Bin Laden – says that Israel or Saudi Arabia could be setting up Iran as a way to foment war
- Pulitzer-prize winning investigative reporter Seymour Hersh also says many ideas for blaming Iran have been proposed by various folks in government
- The highly influential Brookings Institution wrote a report in 2009 called “Which Path to Persia?” which hints that we should blame Iran for anything which happens (pages 84-85):
It would be far more preferable if the United States could cite an Iranian provocation as justification for the airstrikes before launching them. Clearly, the more outrageous, the more deadly, and the more unprovoked the Iranian action, the better off the United States would be.Of course, it would be very difficult for the United States to goad Iran into such a provocation without the rest of the world recognizing this game, which would then undermine it. (One method that would have some possibility of success would be to ratchet up covert regime change efforts in the hope that Tehran would retaliate overtly, or even semi-overtly, which could then be portrayed as an unprovoked act of Iranian aggression.)
- One of America's top constitutional and military law experts – Jonathan Turley - writes:
Many critics have argued that there is a concerted effort to push the United States into a war with Iran by supporters of Israel. Patrick Clawson, director of research for the highly influential pro-Israel Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP) think tank, seemed intent to prove those rumors true this week in comments as a luncheon on “How to Build US-Israeli Coordination on Preventing an Iranian Nuclear Breakout.” Clawson casually discusses how to create a false flag operation to push the U.S. into war to overcome any reluctance by the public. We have been discussing how many leaders like Senator Joe Lieberman had begun to use the same rhetoric that led to the last two wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and how the suggest timing of an attack has been tied to the presidential election.
In his remarks, Clawson helpfully lists a series of historical events used to push the country into war like the Gulf of Tonkin incident that gave us the Vietnam War. Clawson expressed his frustration in acknowledging that it is “[v]ery hard for me to see how the United States President can get us to war with Iran.” However, there is hope. Clawson explains that the “traditional way” to get the country into a war is through false flags or manufactured incidents where Americans are killed. Thus, he observes, “we are in the game of using covert means against the Iranians, we could get nastier about it. So, if in fact the Iranians aren’t going to compromise, it would be best if somebody else started the war.”
The fact that one of the leading analysis for the WINEP would feel comfortable in making such comments is itself quite chilling. It indicates that such discussions have become sufficiently regular that it has creeped into public discussion. It is a measure of the secret pressure building to push this country into a third major war despite our crippling economic conditions and losses in military personnel. The assumption in Washington is that neither Romney nor Obama could oppose such a war. Even if Obama does not publicly support Israel, the assumption is that political allies of Israel in Washington can guarantee that we would offer extensive military loans and intelligence. Even if there is a delay in such military loans and support, the assumption is that Israel can go to war with the understanding that the United States will cover a significant portion of the costs. Moreover, in his remarkably candid remarks, Clawson shows how the U.S. can easily be forced into direct combat by pushing Iran to simply kill some Americans or sink a few of our ships. Then members would be clamoring for revenge. Notably, the Israelis have been ratcheting up the war rhetoric in pushing Iran, which predictably has now reserved the right to engage in a preemptive strike not just against Israeli but U.S. interests. We would then, again, find ourselves in a war without any public debate or collective decision.
While Clawson adds a passing caveat that he is not advocating such an approach, his remarks are clearly designed to show how the group can get the United States into a war for Israel if only we can get Iran to kill some of our citizens or soldiers. Those people are of course expendable props in Clawson’s realpolitik. By the way, Clawson has been enlisted to give his insightful analysis at the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank. He is also a member of the National Defense University’s Institute for National Strategic Studies. The World Bank connection is particularly interesting given the history with Paul Wolfowitz who pushed the U.S. into two disastrous wars in the Bush Administration and was rewarded with being made the head of the World Bank.
It is the callous disconnect that is most chilling in these remarks. Thousands of U.S. soldiers have died or have been crippled for life in these wars that have left the country near bankruptcy (and increasingly hostile “allies” in Afghanistan and Iraq). Those casualties and costs, however, appear immaterial in the discussion of supporting Israel in a war against Iran.
The Boston terror attack was an immense tragedy and a barbaric act of terrorism. Those who carried out the attacks should be brought to justice. But - just as the Federal Reserve, Fannie, Freddie, Treasury and other officials and the big banks "fail their way upwards" - enriching themselves with more power everytime their failure leads to some catastrophe - the homeland security "planners" who have so outrageously squandered our blood and treasure will use this tragedy to grab more power, to further erode our liberties, and to launch more witch hunts. Just watch ...
»
- advertisements -
"So far, the "New Boston Massacre" seems to be a non-false flag event (at least to me)."
Sorry, you must not have been aboard yesterday. This babylonian crime was exposed in less than two hours after it took place. This was a military op and it just sucks to see the peoples own military being turned against it's own people. There is word that there will be another of these false flag event coming in the next days or weeks to bring on the martial law and then you know what?...NONE OF THIS WILL MATTER ANY MORE. NOT THE GOLD, THE CRASH, OR ANYTHING BUT THE GOD OF THE STOMACH.
Here is the run down.:
Play card:
http://12160.info/photo/illuminati-card-291-joggers
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sC6g5SYxE4c
http://kthetruth.com/nwo/illuminati-cards/63-illuminati-cards.html?limitstart=0
Evil at work:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/29/opinion/sunday/terrorist-plots-helped-along-by-the-fbi.html?pagewanted=all&_r=1&
http://www.examiner.com/article/gun-group-had-hand-writing-manchin-toomey-background-check-amendment
The foreknowledge:
http://vidrebel.wordpress.com/2013/04/16/dia-man-was-pulled-from-boston-marathon-by-military/
http://www.rys2sense.com/anti-neocons/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=31837
http://www.storyleak.com/boston-marathon-runner-police-boston-explosion-training-exercise/#ixzz2QaLl5JYZ
http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=160as9k&s=6
Triggers:
http://refreshingnews99.blogspot.in/2013/04/leak-of-identities-emails-of-rich.html
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/04/15/us-markets-commodities-idUSBRE93E0LK20130415
http://www.cnbc.com/id/100640665
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324030704578424123590556556.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_LEFTTopStories
http://investmentwatchblog.com/massive-20-billion-paper-gold-sell-orders-trigger-stop-loss-selling-and-unfounded-panic/
Search->Boston Globe: Officials: There will be a controlled explosion opposite the library within one minute as part of bomb squad activities.
Boston Marathon Bombing happened on Same Day as “Controlled Explosion” Drill by Boston Bomb Squad:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/boston-marathon-bombing-happened-on-same-day-as-controlled-explosion-drill-by-boston-bomb-squad/5331505
And the horse ca-ca comes forth:
Boston Bombs Said to Be Made From Pressure Cookers:
http://abcnews.go.com/Sports/wireStory/explosions-boston-marathon-finish-line-18960342#.UW2GkUqKyUM
Lies at the press conference when asked about the DRILLS:
http://leaksource.wordpress.com/2013/04/15/was-boston-bomb-squad-running-controlled-explosion-on-same-day-as-marathon-blasts/
On the radio, a person has indicated the blame game is played on a Friday. Some 20 year old angry with babylon to be blamed...many assorted pasty SSRI drugged out darpa sad-sacks to choose from to play in the game. Attached: Blame small gunpowder type (pressure cooker?) something blah..blah...blah. It only reeks of moar preplanned babylonian cover-up false flag horsewash to come for the great agenda to take the guns before the crash. What a balancing act aye! Look for a link here later to the broadcast this was heard on.
SLAVES! REGISTER ALL YOUR GUNS NOW FOR CONFISCATION LATER.
***DISCLAIMER: FOR ENTERTAINMENT PURPOSES ONLY.
(for posterity purposes-hard copy and document all this real evidence of this real cover-up crime)
The Feast of Moloch is coming up on April 19. On this day, Illuminati occultists may sacrifice children by fire in order to gain more power from the false flag. They did it with Waco and Oklahoma City at the very least.
Boston cops had a knee-jerk reaction to the old enemy. They didn't get the memo about patriots being the new Public Enemy #1. Patriot's Day, tax day, gunpowder, Boston, exploding pressure cookers. It's all very symbolic. Whoever did it put a lot of thought into it, and is smart enough not to leave obvious tracks, but is not smart enough to realize that this bombing plays right into the government's hands. It doesn't make sense for a real patriot to do this. That's why I think it was a false flag and there will be another one on April 19. TPTB don't want the terrorist caught just yet. Maybe this is the start of a Gladio-style "strategy of tension" with a long series of attacks (perhaps the ricin is part of this?) The idea is to dominate the news for as long as it takes to browbeat the people into giving up the last of their freedoms.
The patsy will be a conservative, nationalistic, white, Christian, veteran, Obama hating, middle class tax protester who selfishly wants to hoard metals and guns instead of giving them to Obama so he can help the poor children.
Yeah – I was here yesterday. Still not buying it. Not everyfucking bad thing that happens is a govt-sponsored conspiracy.
I don’t have time to address all of these, but I’ll address a few:
No doubt the FBI engages in entrapement involving bombs. No doubt the FBI employs agent provocateurs. That doesn’t mean that every bomb that goes off is an FBI covert op.
Sure, TPTB would like us all disarmed. A lone idiot cutting down marathoners with a machine gun would have served that purpose better than two home-made bombs. This distracts from Sandy Hook, if anything.
One guy being pulled out of the race of almost 40,000 entrants is pretty weak evidence of a widespread plot.
Regarding the drills. Enforcement always schedules drills when there are huge events because you can’t simulate the kind of logistical issues responders confront any other way. If you have 100 events with 100 or more drills and one terrorist attack, pinning the drill as part of the conspiracy is pretty weak. Doesn’t mean that any drill wasn’t part of the incident – but you’re going to need lots more than that to be persuasive.
Regarding the markets – shit was going haywire long before the explosions – and this was not like 9/11 where UAL was shorted heavily. Do you really think this event would have effected the markets – particularly gold? If it was a dirty bomb, maybe. Put another way, if you knew a similar event was going to happen tomorrow at another marathon – what would you buy/short? Nike? If anything you’d have been long PMs (and gotten killed).
As far as Robert Anton Wilson's buddy's Illuminati's game cards - If you really think that they are the blueprint for govt. sponsored false-flag terror - be my guest.
Accordingly, I'm sticking with my opinion that this was not a false flag.
"Enforcement always schedules drills when there are huge events"
Do yo have any sources on that? I've been at huge events all my life, and I've never seen a drill.
Nope no cite - but since the advent of the 9/11/Patriot Act/DHS/TSA police state era, I've seen plenty announcements of law enforcement training that corresponds with local events.
FWIW, the JFK Library training thing was pretty far away from the start/finish line. I think the bomb-sniffing dogs at the marathon were actual security. Any connection between the library and the planting of the bombs seems to be a stretch.
FYI See: http://www.cops.usdoj.gov/Publications/e07071299_web.pdf particularly pp. 9 & 58 regarding the use of dogs for security. Pretty interesting overview of mass security during events.
You know they were doing a drill for the 9-11 scenario on 9-11, right? They were also doing a drill for the Oklahoma City bombing, just before the bomb went off. So these "coincidences" predate 9-11.
Cool. Thank you for expressing your truth so well. Big appreciation.
Ask, if there were all these bomb sniffing doggies at the start and finish lines, why didn't they find those bombs?
Maybe there is a lot that the public does not know, and maybe there is still a lot to know. These messages born for you to ponder are just parts of the game. Yes, it is interesting the "Ill cards" play interesting resemblances with historical and possible historical events. Sadly, in this matrix of preplanned illusions, anything can happen, at any time. Nothing is predictable, but evil is always the same. It is rarely anything great for the world, or humanity in general. All that is a whole different arena and forum to discuss in, and surly there are greater voices in the wilderness that might speak to this a lot louder than this voice in the jungle of love can. As the players keep doing their thing, we shall all see. The latest meme is the 'crock-pot' conspiracy theory. The evidence so far all points to the same old make war by deception kind of philosophy. The long and short of it is, who profits in the end? And what is valuable to one, is not always the same thing that is valuable to another. Like truth, everyone has one, and sometimes there are differences. Shall we ALL stand upright in the Lights of liberty...or perish in the shadows of darkness unlit to the truth?
---Freedom is a Light for which many men have died in darkness
bomb sniffing doggies at the start and finish lines, why didn't they find those bombs?
Bombs were in pressure cookers, as we now know. So they could have been sanitized to remove all trace explosives, and probably were.
Hello TSR.
Ponder this, ever see how they TRY to hide dope from these sniffy dogs? It is pretty uncanny how they find things that are sealed that you might think, surly that doggie could never smell that, in there. And they do!
Thanks for playing through.
There were NO dogs on site:
http://www.debka.com/article/22901/Saudi-terror-cell-possibly-al-Qaeda-behind-Boston-Marathon-bombings-Manhunt-for-escaped-suspect
They brought out The Big Empty Suit to talk on TV twice. If it was actually a terrorist act, they'd ignore it until they could get spin behind it. They had this shit ready.
It's a staged op.
Ignore it? Are you kidding? If the Pres didn't weigh-in immediately, folks would have been all over his ass.
How well did holding back work for "W" during Katrina?
I don't think it was staged. It could be sting operation that got out of control, though.
"I don't think it was staged. It could be sting operation that got out of control, though."
The sad part of this matrix is, all this kind of craziness is possible because of the 9/11 born paradigm of lies and deceit, and all that ensued from that huge murderous crime. What God knows, and these evil things that profit from these lies have done for money and propagandistically hide, are two great stories.
At this time in history. Man is being given the choice as to which one will be told, for only the conquers of freedom and the rights born unto man, or freedom and goodness tell the story after it is all over. And honey pies, it is going to be over some day.
If it is not Love...what is it?
Love or fear...choose well.
What goes around, comes around, heard that one before?
The Law of Cycles was among the first to become...manifest.
Zombie apocalypse wasn't a waste - it is preconditioning for mass slaughter of masses of starving, desperate citizens.
Why the questions?
Yes, Jesus died for the Klingons, Ferengi, Vulcans, Tribbles and Assorted Women of Loose Character
Hey, even the Vatican is getting in the act. Top officials in the city of nuts said they'd be willing to baptise space aliens who accepted Jesus.
"Yes, Jesus died for the Klingons, Ferengi, Vulcans, Tribbles and Assorted Women of Loose Character"
No Jesus didn't. You watch much Star Trek? From season 2 episode 5: "Jesus Straightens out the Galaxy."
Scene: Federation landing party on the plant Klingleberry.
Jesus: Look there's one of those Klingon fucks
Spock: It would be logical to communicate with him...
Jesus grabs Spock's phaser
Kirk: The Prime Directive requires we turn the other cheek.
Jesus (setting the phaser to kill and phasing the Klingon): I got your other cheek.
Jesus (turning to Spock and firing at Spock's foot): and that's what it felt like, you one-footed, big-eared, son of a Vulcan infidel
Kirk (Phasing the dead Klingon): Bounce, Klingon bitch
And scene.
Fail. Kirk is Jesus!
No. That's season 3, episode 7: "No Prime Directive Gonna Hold me Down". Kirk and Jesus get their molecules scrambled being transported by an angry, drunken Scotty. The result is a very muscular, overacting Jesus who spouts scripture while eviscerating the entire planet in the search for Xenite. When the Xenite is safely on board, Kirk orders Spock to nuke the planet from orbit. "No Xenite down there, anyway." The other being spawned by the transporter mix-up was some diffident gay guy. Kirk left him on the planet. Later at an inquest Kirk testifies that Spock pressed the nuke button.
Jesus is a myth. Christianity is power.
Thank you. Bless.
It could be put it in many words. Here is the basic what you should know from wiki:
"Paul the Apostle most often referred to Jesus as "Jesus Christ", "Christ Jesus", or "Christ".[36] "Christ" (pron.: /?kra?st/) is derived from the Greek ??????? (Khr?stos), meaning "the anointed" or "the anointed one", a translation of the Hebrew ???????? (M?šîa?), usually transliterated into English as "Messiah" (pron.: /m??sa?.?/).[37] In the Septuagint version of the Hebrew Bible (written well over a century before the time of Jesus), the word "Christ" (???????) was used to translate the Hebrew word "Messiah" (????????) into Greek.[38] In Matthew 16:16, the apostle Peter's profession "You are the Christ" identifies Jesus as the Messiah.[39] In postbiblical usage, "Christ" became viewed as a name, one part of "Jesus Christ", but originally it was a title ("Jesus the Anointed").[40]"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus
So ah, to say one is seeking Jesus Christ, or more Englishly correct, Christ Jesus, one is saying they are seeking the Messiah/savior initiated/anointed, or more properly, the Anointed/Initiated Messiah/Savior. Kinda like seeking the pizza maker, or the ball player. You might rather ask, have you seen Tom, the pizza maker around? I am seeking him. If you just say you are seeking the pizza maker, well, there are millions of them, but only one Tom.
The problem with modern christianity is, it turned into a religion all about the man, instead of what he taught. It was what he taught, or the knowledge he anointed/initiated one with that saved. Same then, as it is this day. Nothing changes under the Sun. One saves themselves by their own words, deeds, and actions, and not by believing in a hocus pocus fantasy about some guy with a magic wand on a flying carpet that is going to swoop down and rescue all those who refused to see and hear the truths of this universe.
For posterity purposes, this was only done so the entire crew can be on the same page of definitions when these words are used by any one.
Ponder this. The old Rasta man would say to us kids: Hey Mon! You can believe anything...but WHAT DO YOU KNOW?
Jesus is a logical necessity based upon how the universe is constructed. The universe runs on righteousness. Justice is very real and unavoidable unless you obtain forgiveness.
This is a falsifiable statement. If you follow even one of the 613 commandments in the bible, you will find that it takes God to fulfill God's law.
Anyone who makes truth a priority is awestruck by how ignorant we really are, and that is where learning can occur.
Yeshua bless
Double post
Honestly, have you ever tried to seek him? He is as real as life itself. Please reconsider that statement.... if you seek him he will come to you.
John 3:18
He who believes in Him is not condemned; but he who does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.
As for modern Christianity, evangelicals.... it is the Pharisees and other Jewdizers of Jesus's ministry and early Church and they shall also have their reward as wolves in the pulpits.
Tree of Nonsense
Just curious, can anyone define the word, "Jusus?"
Please explain it's origin for educational purposes only.
English. Jesus
Greek. Iesous
Original hebrew. Yehoshua as in the book of Joshua in the hebrew bible. It has two elements. The first is God's Holy Name. And the second element means to "save." My understanding is that it means to cry out to God almighty for salvation.
if you want to get all technical, (the first element -- the Yeho- in Yehoshua) Hebrew god's name is
<p lang="he"> ???? </p>
greek, Iehovah, YHWH/JHWH or Jehovah in english
source: Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade
Yes, it has to be explained since most don't get it--all the zombie bullshit is really putting de-humanized targets in place of actual ethnic minorities and urban poor. The entire "zombie" conversation is just a PC filter around the real conversation in order to make it possible to even have such a conversation.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4xyhVO-SWfM
I could tell there was some serious predictive programming going on for several years with all this zombie bullshit. And it's only gotten worse with Walking Dead and half a dozen or more major box office zombie movies. I knew somebody had a major reprogramming agenda on the table, redirecting social attitudes towards or away from "something," but I couldn't quite put my finger on it.
I think you got very close to the nail, and maybe even hit it on the head with one word: dehumanization.
good point.
"zombie ...putting de-humanized targets in place of actual ethnic minorities and urban poor."
As an aside, one could argue something similar about the whole "sheeple" meme as well. A VERY subtle form of divide-and-conquer, get the "awake" population to feel superior and isolated, gradually dehumanize your fellowman. Instead of facilitating conversation, it smothers
...as you can see from vooter's comment below
I haven't found most SHEEPLE to be receptive to "conversing" about anything of importance regarding waking up-they're just not interested. It's like walking in on two people having a conversation about american idol (or their new Iphone, or Ford stock, or the brand new MegaCab that they never use) and being like "Oh REALLY? Wow, tell me moar!"
You can lead a sheeple to water, but you can't make it give a fuck about thirsting to death.
In principle, yeah, but sometimes, like with the term "sheeple," it's just a way of distancing yourself from their plight and fate.
Now in the case of the Squid's "muppets" you have a good parellel: they dehuminize their finanicial prey.
"In principle, yeah, but sometimes, like with the term "sheeple," it's just a way of distancing yourself from their plight and fate."
our fate is the same as their fate, on a long enough timeline... :)
Sheeple, muppet and sucker are just verbal shorthand to keep us from typing too much.
How else do you have the important discussions with your loved ones about what your plans, rules of engagement, etc will be once the EBT cards stop working?
De humanize the victims.That's how good Germans from the professional classes
became Einsatzgruppen members, and camp guards.
Yup, but not this time. People in uniform better decide really fast whose side they are on. The battle lines will be forming. Military occupation of US cities will not be tolerated. Also, I disagree--there were no "good Germans" left after WWI.
How many "good" Germans died trying to kill Hitler - the Austrian? Plenty.
Go back to watching TV and Hollywood's shit about evil Germans and the daily brainwashing.
Hollywood and Tom Cruise did make the movie "Valkyrie" about Colonel Claus von Stauffenberg and the plan to overthrow the Nazis:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0985699/
Also, there is an older film, Night of the Generals that (if I recollect correctly) was focused on the bunker bombing attempt.
and there's the whole kid in the attic thing.
It's not a good german bad german lesson
its an it can happen anywhere anytime lesson
I was saying they were good before.
Why would they occupy cities ?
Cordon,isolate, and starve out has worked for millenia.
They will be begging to be shipped to FEMA camps eventually.
Could I suggest a few cities?
If there's one thing I have problems with, it's the concept of military occupation of "cities"
There ain't enough soldiers on the face of the entire planet to occupy even a half dozen of the large inner cities.
What else is there to occupy?
Beverly Hills?
Midtown Manhattan?
Greenwich, CT?
West Des Moines?
Altoona?
There are plenty enough to choke off travel though.
I tracked down the DOD microbrewery. It's the "Impact Zone" at Fort Sill, OK.
http://www.sillmwr.com/food-beverage/impact-zone/
Then I took a look down the page at the "Hail and Farewell" packages and noticed that Army people must not be too good at math, as the more people you have, the less they get for their money!