This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
Please Don’t Kill Everyone Who “Looks Muslim” Just Because the Boston Terrorists Were Allegedly Muslim
Without going down any rabbit holes about who carried out the Boston bombings (you can go down some here if you'd like) - or bringing up previous Chechen terrorist frame-ups (by the Russians) - I'd like to take one contrarian view ...
Maybe we shouldn't "kill all Muslims" just because the Boston terrorists appear to be Chechen Muslims.
Specifically - after 9/11 - Americans murdered a number of people because they “looked Muslim” … even though they were actually from a completely different religion.
Yesterday, a Muslim woman with an infant was attacked by someone blaming Muslims for the Boston terrorist attacks.
There is also a remote possibility that rogue fundamentalist Christian military personnel could start a nuclear war against Muslim nations.
Many are writing that the Boston bombers – Chechen brothers Dzhokhar and Tamerlan Tsarnaev – were devout Muslims.
If they were - in fact - the Boston bombers, then we are all for taking them out by any means necessary. And we have no hesitation in giving them the death penalty if they are convicted in a court of law.
However, we congratulate the FBI for taking terrorist # 2 alive (here's an actual photo of his capture).
After all, we can gain much more valuable intelligence from a terrorist in custody than a dead terrorist.
I am not Muslim. But – in an attempt to minimize the wave of anti-Muslim violence which may unleashed, people might want to note that Tamerlan looked more like a Westernized hustler than a devout Muslim:
(that’s his Mercedes in the background).
And Dzhokhar looks somewhat Westernized as well:
He is allegedly a pothead. 2 days after the Boston terrorist attack, he worked out in the gym and went to a college party.
Similarly, the 9/11 hijackers used cocaine and drank alcohol, slept with prostitutes and attended strip clubs … but they did not worship at any mosque. See this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, and this. Hardly the acts of devout Muslims.
More importantly, Muslim scholars tell me that Islam prohibits the killing of innocent civilians. So terrorists are not true Muslims. Those claiming they are committing terrorist acts as Muslims are as credible as the Norwegian murderer or Timothy McVeigh trying to say they were following Christians values.
As we’ve previously noted:
If we ban mosques because some Muslims are murderers, we should also ban churches because Timothy McVeigh was a Christian.
Indeed, we should also ban synagogues because some Jews commit terrorism (see second bulleted paragraph).
Of course, anyone who sees their religion as the “good guys” and the other guy’s religion as “evil” is living in a cartoon.
As Christian writer and psychiatrist M. Scott Peck explained, there are different stages of spiritual maturity. Fundamentalism – whether it be Muslim, Christian, Jewish or Hindu fundamentalism – is an immature stage of development.
[Remember that Adolph Hitler professed to be a Christian, and churches in Nazi Germany mainly supported Adolph Hitler's unjust fascist policies. And Christian, Jewish and Muslim governments all carry out terror against their own people ... and then try to blame it on the other guy.
There are peaceful, contemplative Muslim sects - think the poet Rumi the poet and Sufis - and violent sects, just as there are contemplative Christian orders and violent Christian sects. ]
Indeed, a Christian fundamentalist who kills others in the name of religion is much more similar to a Muslim fundamentalist who kills other in the name of his religion than to a Christian who peacefully fights for justice and truth, helps the poor, or serves to bring hope to the downtrodden.
***
The war on terror is largely a religious war. [Just today, a new report shows that the Air Force uses Christian and Old Testament teachings to justify the launch of nuclear weapons.]
As I pointed out in January:
ABC News is reporting that U.S. military weapons are inscribed with secret ‘Jesus’ Bible codes [the military subsequently endorsed this practice]
Conservative Christians were the biggest backers of the Iraq war …
One of the top Pentagon officials involved in the Iraq war – General William Boykin – literally:
Sees the “war on terror” as a religious war between Judeo-Christian civilization and Satan, with Islam of course cast in the latter role.
Jeremy Scahill describes Boykin as:
A Deputy Undersecretary of Defense for Intelligence under Bush. Boykin was part of Donald Rumsfeld’s inner circle at the Pentagon where he was placed in charge of hunting “high-value targets.” Boykin was one of the key U.S. officials in establishing what critics alleged was death-squad-type activity in Iraq.
Boykin’s crusade is also important because one of his assigned jobs was:
Speeding up the flow of intelligence on terrorist leaders to combat teams in the field so that they can attack top-ranking terrorist leaders. It can easily be speculated that it is this urgency to obtain intelligence, and an uncompromising religious outlook backed by a [crusader] mentality, that has led to the lower echelons in the US military to adopt Saddam Hussein-like brutalities.
Moreover, the U.S. military has just been busted trying to convert Afghanis to Christianity (the same thing happened in Iraq).
As Scahill notes:
What’s more, the center of this evangelical operation is at the huge US base at Bagram, one of the main sites used by the US military to torture and indefinitely detain prisoners.
The bottom line is that – while torture was ordered by the highest level Bush administration officials in order to create a false link between 9/11 and Iraq – it seems like many of those who enthusiastically rallied around torture looked at it, literally, as a religious crusade.
As I wrote in 2009:
According to French President Chirac, Bush told him that the Iraq war was needed to bring on the apocalypse:
In Genesis and Ezekiel Gog and Magog are forces of the Apocalypse who are prophesied to come out of the north and destroy Israel unless stopped. The Book of Revelation took up the Old Testament prophesy:
“And when the thousand years are expired, Satan shall be loosed out of his prison, And shall go out to deceive the nations which are in the four quarters of the earth, Gog and Magog, to gather them together to battle and fire came down from God out of heaven, and devoured them.”
Bush believed the time had now come for that battle, telling Chirac:
“This confrontation is willed by God, who wants to use this conflict to erase his people’s enemies before a New Age begins”…
There can be little doubt now that President Bush’s reason for launching the war in Iraq was, for him, fundamentally religious. He was driven by his belief that the attack on Saddam’s Iraq was the fulfilment of a Biblical prophesy in which he had been chosen to serve as the instrument of the Lord.
And British Prime Minister Tony Blair long-time mentor, advisor and confidante said:
“Tony’s Christian faith is part of him, down to his cotton socks. He believed strongly at the time, that intervention in Kosovo, Sierra Leone – Iraq too – was all part of the Christian battle; good should triumph over evil, making lives better.”
Mr Burton, who was often described as Mr Blair’s mentor, says that his religion gave him a “total belief in what’s right and what’s wrong”, leading him to see the so-called War on Terror as “a moral cause”…
Anti-war campaigners criticised remarks Mr Blair made in 2006, suggesting that the decision to go to war in Iraq would ultimately be judged by God.
Given that the Iraq war really was a crusade, the fact that the Pentagon is now saying that it may have to leave troops in Iraq for another decade shows that the crusade is still ongoing under Obama.
Indeed, churchgoers are more likely to back torture of suspected terrorists than atheists (and see this), and torture is apparently still continuing under the Obama administration.
As we noted in 2010, Arab terrorists are not actually motivated by religion at all:
University of Chicago professor Robert A. Pape – who specializes in international security affairs – points out:
Extensive research into the causes of suicide terrorism proves Islam isn’t to blame — the root of the problem is foreign military occupations.
Wait, what? That can’t be right!
But as Pape explains:
Each month, there are more suicide terrorists trying to kill Americans and their allies in Afghanistan, Iraq, and other Muslim countries than in all the years before 2001 combined.***
New research provides strong evidence that suicide terrorism such as that of 9/11 is particularly sensitive to foreign military occupation, and not Islamic fundamentalism or any ideology independent of this crucial circumstance. Although this pattern began to emerge in the 1980s and 1990s, a wealth of new data presents a powerful picture.
More than 95 percent of all suicide attacks are in response to foreign occupation, according to extensive research [co-authored by James K. Feldman - former professor of decision analysis and economics at the Air Force Institute of Technology and the School of Advanced Airpower Studies] that we conducted at the University of Chicago’s Project on Security and Terrorism, where we examined every one of the over 2,200 suicide attacks across the world from 1980 to the present day. As the United States has occupied Afghanistan and Iraq, which have a combined population of about 60 million, total suicide attacks worldwide have risen dramatically — from about 300 from 1980 to 2003, to 1,800 from 2004 to 2009. Further, over 90 percent of suicide attacks worldwide are now anti-American. The vast majority of suicide terrorists hail from the local region threatened by foreign troops, which is why 90 percent of suicide attackers in Afghanistan are Afghans.
Israelis have their own narrative about terrorism, which holds that Arab fanatics seek to destroy the Jewish state because of what it is, not what it does. But since Israel withdrew its army from Lebanon in May 2000, there has not been a single Lebanese suicide attack. Similarly, since Israel withdrew from Gaza and large parts of the West Bank, Palestinian suicide attacks are down over 90 percent.
Some have disputed the causal link between foreign occupation and suicide terrorism, pointing out that some occupations by foreign powers have not resulted in suicide bombings — for example, critics often cite post-World War II Japan and Germany. Our research provides sufficient evidence to address these criticisms by outlining the two factors that determine the likelihood of suicide terrorism being employed against an occupying force.
The first factor is social distance between the occupier and occupied. The wider the social distance, the more the occupied community may fear losing its way of life. Although other differences may matter, research shows that resistance to occupations is especially likely to escalate to suicide terrorism when there is a difference between the predominant religion of the occupier and the predominant religion of the occupied.
Religious difference matters not because some religions are predisposed to suicide attacks. Indeed, there are religious differences even in purely secular suicide attack campaigns, such as the LTTE (Hindu) against the Sinhalese (Buddhists).
Rather, religious difference matters because it enables terrorist leaders to claim that the occupier is motivated by a religious agenda that can scare both secular and religious members of a local community — this is why Osama bin Laden never misses an opportunity to describe U.S. occupiers as “crusaders” motivated by a Christian agenda to convert Muslims, steal their resources, and change the local population’s way of life.
The second factor is prior rebellion. Suicide terrorism is typically a strategy of last resort, often used by weak actors when other, non-suicidal methods of resistance to occupation fail. This is why we see suicide attack campaigns so often evolve from ordinary terrorist or guerrilla campaigns, as in the cases of Israel and Palestine, the Kurdish rebellion in Turkey, or the LTTE in Sri Lanka.
One of the most important findings from our research is that empowering local groups can reduce suicide terrorism. In Iraq, the surge’s success was not the result of increased U.S. military control of Anbar province, but the empowerment of Sunni tribes, commonly called the Anbar Awakening, which enabled Iraqis to provide for their own security. On the other hand, taking power away from local groups can escalate suicide terrorism. In Afghanistan, U.S. and Western forces began to exert more control over the country’s Pashtun regions starting in early 2006, and suicide attacks dramatically escalated from this point on.
***
The first step is recognizing that occupations in the Muslim world don’t make Americans any safer — in fact, they are at the heart of the problem.
But surely Pape and his team of University of Chicago researchers are wrong. Surely other security experts disagree, right?
No.
The top security experts – conservative hawks and liberal doves alike – agree that waging war in the Middle East weakens national security and increases terrorism. See this, this, this, this, this and this.
As one of the top counter-terrorism experts (the former number 2 counter-terrorism expert at the State Department) told me, starting wars against states which do not pose an imminent threat to America’s national security increases the threat of terrorism because:
One of the principal causes of terrorism is injuries to people and families.
***
And its not only war in general as an abstract concept. The methods we’re using to wage war are increasing terrorism.
As one example, torture reduces our national security and creates new terrorists.
Unfortunately, we are continuing to indiscriminately kill civilians using drone strikes, and we are continuing to torture innocent people (see this, this, this, and this).
This is not a question of being a “Muslim-sympathizer”. I am not a Muslim …. This isn’t about religion at all.
Its all about being practical in protecting our national security.
»
- advertisements -
The FBI has the following Youtube video displayed on the front page of their website.
This is the bullshit they are basing their "case" on. It shows these young guys walking thru casually with backpacks over one shoulder. There were tons of people there that had backpacks on. In fact some of the FBI operatives (the guys with tan pants and black tops) had on big backpacks that looked stuffed.
Don't think for minute they will not be using same tactics on YOUR kids someday.
THIS VIDEO DOES NOT SHOW ANY EVIDENCE OF FOUL PLAY ON THE PART OF THESE TWO BROTHERS (The FBI really thinks we are all idiots...that's why they keep doing this):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M80DXI932OE&feature=player_embedded
Yes and once they saw these videos released they became scared that they would be unjustly accused of the pressure cooker bombing. So naturally, they decided their most rational course of action was to actually construct a pressure cooker bomb, throw it into a crowd of policemen in Watertown, and engage in an intense firefight with police with automatic weapons, firing off 200+ rounds and striking 2 officers. This by the way wasn't seen only by FBI. It was seen by dozens of smalltown PD, journalists both local and national, and a huge amount of everyday citizens who identify them as the Tsaernev Bros. Yea, they sound like a couple of patsies to me.
They where there but did it act alone. No way they could carry and hide 7 of these bombs. I would take someone say in desert boots , fatigues and with large black back packs for each one. Sounds like at least 6 more cause you never carry the bomb and the detonator together.
Right, I agree there are discrepancies. The thing with the Saudi is especcially suspicious to me. My point is that these two were involved beyond reasonable doubt. I'll wait to hear what this kid has to say to reach an exact conclusion
I don't know if there is or isn't any evidence but
you are right, they just wave a cloth with a whiff
of innuendo on it and the population swoons and
begs for more blood. there will be a price to pay
for this stupidity and it is your lack of humanity,
judgment, civility and decency.
bad karma.
the video proves absolutely nothing and reveals
very little. where is the incriminating evidence
against these suspects, one already dead.
none has been made public but the presumption of
guilt is nearly universal in the media. the new normal,
presumption of guilt, authorities statements are
deemed to be infallible. or is that just the old normal?
or is presumption of innocence only a principle of law
and justice that applies to certain cults, religious affiliation
and financial status and denied to others?
Something like 50% of British Muslims admit to sympathy for Al Queda, so if you extrapolate to the Muslims in America, then for a given pair, you will find a 75% chance one or both have such sympathies. Thus their sympathies, if they are as portrayed, pretty much add nothing to the evidence.
the cia and usa are working with al ciada and supplying them
with weapons to kill people, that sounds like a sort of
sympathy to me, is there a problem with that?
Sympathizing with a group does not mean you would ever blow up people. Al Queda, which means base and was originally a computer program created by the U.S. military, has basically become just a vague word used to lump together all Muslim people being bombed by the United States.
The U.S. State department and military are now backing "Al Queda" in Syria.
So, Al Quada, is a load of B.S. There is no "war on terror". They are terrorizing the Muslim world to demoralize them until they acquiesce to the Western ways.
What the Muslims in the U.S. and all over the world are concerned about and sickened about is the Massive Terrorism going on towards their people in the way of U.S. bombs, Drone bombings, Fallujah-type massacres, Depleted Uranium, and other chemical warfare used against them...THEN BEING THE ONES DEMONIZED BY THE AMERICAN-BRITISH-ISRAELI MEDIA.
You sound like the commie dyke who comes into work and lectures everybody on diversity.
Beware of decievers who steal the names of patriots and call themselves libertarians, but who then push the exact same agenda as the communist left.
Commie decievers like Boy George love the pigshit muslime koranimals because they are easy to use as foot soldiers against their common enemy: Western Civilization.
It was the Zionists, who with their mass immigration agenda, brought them in. Don't hate your enemy's weapon, hate your enemy.
'
'
'
Required watching for everyone who buys into the mainstream idea that radical Muslims don't want to hurt us
http://youtu.be/08EYqwyns-k
On The Map with Avi Lewis: Ayaan Hirsi Ali & IslamophobiaListen to Hirsi, in her quiet way, just tear this politically correct, sneering little leftist apart with his bogus views on America and Muslims.
Required watching. 10 minutes you'll never forget.
She's a great woman.
So if these guys didn't do it because they were muslims, why'd they do it?
(Maybe GW should read their FB pages, to see what they were writing. It ain't pretty.)
•J•
V-V
God you're gullible.
Hirsi Ali entered the Netherlands and Dutch politics under false pretences. She didn't come from a poor family, she wasn't a refugee, she was a liar.
She moved from left to right, then was kicked out and moved to the USA to become part of the Heritage Foundation.
Hirsi Ali, Geert Wilders and Pim Fortuyn have torn the Netherlands apart by polarizing tensions for their own benefits: the fascist playbook. Don't let it happen to the USA.
Dood...'radical Muslims' do want to hurt you...
but only because your ZOG-hijacked and operated government trains and pays them to.
Tings to ponderate:
http://www.activistpost.com/2013/04/fbi-casting-set-stage-for-boston.html
Q. 'So if these guys didn't do it because they were muslims, why'd they do it?'
A: because they didn't?
19 year old bomber, who plans a remote control detonation of a backpack bomb in the middle of a police security operation, at the most vulnerable and monitored spot, and yet goes off and parties after the bombing, then hides in a boat. Yeah, right.
Even if they did do it, it was kind of a failed operation, done by a bunch of clumsy amateur terrorists. The other bombs did not detonate (assuming there really were other bombs that is) and they went on a shooting rampage instead of leaving town and keeping a low profile.
What any aspiring terrorist group has now seen though, is that you can spook the USA, and lock down an entire city, with a pressure cooker. This is how vulnerable the USA really is, and this is what it has shown to the world: pull out a pressure cooker and we are scared shitless and bring out the army!
Me thinks the demand for pressure cookers might go up...
There will be peace in the world when religion is a footnote in the history books.
Simpletons like you are really stupidly annoying. Most wars are over land, wealth, and power, not religion. WWI was over land. Colonization was over land and wealth. WWII was over land. The roman conquests were for land and wealth.
'There will be peace in the world when religion is a footnote in the history books.'
Atheism did not protect the Ukrainian people from Lenin, nor the Chinese people from Dezung.
Christianity gave us mass education worldwide. What did atheist movements do in comparison?
"Christianity gave us mass education worldwide. What did atheist movements do in comparison?"
- The computer you're typing on and internet your packets flow over
- Close-up pics of our neighboring planets and their moons
- An understanding of the DNA that defines our genetics
What else has (organized) "Christianity" given us?
- Some none-too shy "editing" at Nicea and Trent
- Christians that can't even get along with their fellow Christians, much less any other creed
- Regressive anti-science zealotry and the enoblement of ignorance
The computer you're typing on and internet your packets flow over
- Close-up pics of our neighboring planets and their moons
- An understanding of the DNA that defines our genetics
Newton was a Christian, and it was his work on gravity that gave us our modern view of astronimical motion of the planets.
Many computer scientists involved with the Internet are Christians.
It is absurd and disingenuous to say that atheism created any of these things.
The Abstraction...
1. Most Ukrainians were starved/murdered by "collectivizaton" under Stalin. And I don't know how you think Ukrainians were atheists.
Your claim about mass education can be narrowed to Protestantism, finding God directly, not thru some self-proclaimed authority with an inside ear to the Big Guys whims.
As yet, Atheists and Agnostics haven't been burned at the stake, but thanks for the heads up. Oh, and thanks for stopping the burning of your mothers and sisters by tagging them as witches.
I guess being burned at the stake as a withch is worse than being starved and frozen to death for not bowing on your knees to your commissar. LOL
Ukranians also died in the tens of millions under Lenin. Don't let the Leninists convince you that Bolshevism was some how subverted by Stalin, it was just as murderous before the man came to power.
The relgion of the Ukranians was not the issue, but the religion of the perpetrators of the Holodomor, and they were atheists.
Oh, and thanks for stopping the burning of your mothers and sisters by tagging them as witches.
- I have no sisters and my mother was not burned. I am also irreligious.
As with most mass murder, statistics are limited. I never said Lenin did not cause the murder of Ukrainians. Lenin was an equal opportunity murderer as was Stalin. But Stalin made collectivization of Kulak land and destruction of the Orthodox Church official Soviet policy.
The deaths in the Ukraine was not about religion per se, but about power- the routing of competition.
I'm sure the millions of victims of Stalin's atheist government will be happy to know that he didn't kill them due to their religion.
Sounds a bit of an apologism for atheist murder. As if whenever an atheist kills it is never to do with his atheism, which is coincidental, but when a theist kills, it is because always because he is a theist.
Number of people killed by the Spanish Inquistition < 5000.
Number of Chinese killed by Mao > 60,000,000.
Wrong, wrong, wrong. But this will take time for you to see as it appears you have alot of growing up to do. What pray tell is the religous connection with the lust for other peoples shit and their servitude. Do you think the President of the USA, the Prime Minister of England, Putin, the French President, the German Chancellor Merkel, China's Premier Wen Jiabao are regular members of the Methodist, Catholic faith? Do christians or buddhist demand your money or time or on the other hand will hell fire and damnation will rain down upon you by gods angles clothed in olive drab and kevlar if you fail to pay tribute?
I would say entrenched nihilist thinking and teaching of college and the secular world has set you up as a convert into the Church of the Almighty Government brother. Go in peace and sin no more against your god the public teat.
booboo
So in your mind it is not possible to believe there is no Angry-Big-Guy in the Sky and that Big Government is also the bane of Mankind ?
It is possible to believe in the philosophy of Christ (or any other religion) without believing in the Magic. A lot of hyperbole was developed to sell the soap. Most of it based on fear.
"So in your mind it is not possible to believe there is no Angry-Big-Guy in the Sky and that Big Government is also the bane of Mankind ?"
Well the first premise that God is "angry" is probably rooted in rock throwing natives tossing virgins into volcano's and continues to this day in "modern christiandumb", it serves mainstream religions well.
But yes I do believe that the two; (No god and no good government) can be held as a belief but that was not the issue. The subject was that religion is the cause of ALL strife.
On the other hand is it possible to believe that a position of a loving God and that we "wrestle not against flesh and blood but against principalities and powers in high places" philosophy can be held at the same time.
As for the "magic" and someone watching us from above, can someone hold that other invisible life forms jet around the universe and taunt us with faster then light speed crafts and Jedi like mind tricks and no "magic" at the same time?
I hold no animosity towards any religious person, ending at the point where they believe it is OK to kill me or my family in the name of their God.
Your points are well reasoned and well taken. After all, belief is, well, belief.
Islam is not what needs to be viewed as dangerous, what needs to be viewed as dangerous is religion elevated within a society to the level of law. After these types of events, people always compare Christianity and Islam. But you can't fairly make this comparison because Islam doesn't play the same role in the Arab world as Christianity does in the EuroAmeroAnglican world. If Christianity was as centric to our society as Islam is to their's then Christianity would be equally dangerous. This was the case in Europe 500 years ago. Back then we had despotic theocratic divine rule just like in the Middle east, We had widespread inter-sect violence just like in the middle east, and people lived in religious serfdom just like in the middle east. The Arab world is frankly a backward society especcially in the eastern portions, they have no means of social mobility, inadequate education, and they live in violence. In any such society, religion is dangerous. Which religion it is is immaterial
Therefore I agree with you GW that it isn't Islam that inherently promotes violence. However one thing I take exception to use the assertion that Jihadist violence is purely political. It is right to point that the political motivation for such violence is often underrecognized, but to act as if it is the only motivation is sort-sighted. Ron Paul makes this mistake constantly. Yes they don't like Israel, yes they don't like US bases in Saudi Arabia, Yes they don't like our support for Arab strongmen dictators. But they also act out of a hatred for secular society. If you listen to Osama Bin Laden you'll think they have primarily political motivations. If you listen to Zawahiri, you'll think they have primarily religious motivations. the answer is obviously a little of both. To marginilize the importance of either one is wrong.
Islam, the boil on gods butt.
SleepingBear
Well said. The Catholic Church refused to allow the Bible to be written in any other language but Latin. Martin Luther translated it into German and preached the Bible to his flock in German. Many innocents were murdered by the Catholic Church to try to stop Luther. No tyrant tolerates a challenge to his authority.
And Islam today is the Catholic Church of 500 years ago. Insular, arrogant and increasingly irrelevant.
I would argue that Talmudism promotes inherent racial supremacism and genocide. Ergo the state of the world.
common george, I would expect more out of someone who claims to respect freedom and personal rights. have you personally studied the Koran and the life of Mohammed? all these attacts are 100 % justified! No I will agree with you 99.9 % of Muslims view it to be totally peaceful, but that doesnt mean they are right. no one is going to go out and kill Muslims, that is absurd. But everyone in this country needs to educate themselves of what Islam really teaches. Pull up the show Jesus or Mohammed on YouTube. Educate yoursel on the Koran and what it is about, dont jus blindly listen to "muslim scholars"
I'd much prefer it if everyone who thinks all Muslims need to die because of alleged Muslims taking part in events like this (ignoring the obvious FBI/CIA involvement in basically every supposed Muslim bombing) would simply die themselves. Then I would like any Muslims or anyone of any other religion (or non-religion) who lumps in all people of a faith or location like that to also die. This would probably wipe out a huge portion of useless twats in the world and those of us who have a clue would be much better off.
2013 and people still have all this discrimination bullshit.
Here is what I REALLY like. Most of the "kill all Muslims!! They are evil" people in the U.S are also the same people who go on about gun ownership and complain when all gun owners get lumped in whenever a mass shooting happens. So they correctly see the idiocy in proclaiming all gun owners are potential mass killing shooters yet they don't see the idiocy in proclaiming Muslims, all 1.6 BILLION of them, are evil and wanting to blow everyone up. BRILLIANT. It just shows how damn stupid human beings can be and how limited the average human brain is.
Oh and also damn those people in the middle east who have the nerve to get pissed off at the U.S sending in drones to wipe out a bunch of civilians every week and the U.S invading their countries all the time. Clearly they should be thankful for that just like Vietnamese people should be thankful for being hit with agent orange and Japanese people should be happy with a-bombs being dropped on them and how long lasting the effects have been from those incidents. All hail the U.S. the kings of the world who do no wrong, just want to bring peace to nations (by apparently killing thousands in said nations), democracy to nations (by installing their own puppet government) and are so innocent and any aggressive action against anyone who lives there is just from people hating the amazing freedoms Americans have like being groped when trying to get on a damn airplane.
You were doing good in the first paragraph, then you drop a non sequitur stinkbomb:
Most of the "kill all Muslims!! They are evil" people in the U.S are also the same people who go on about gun ownership and complain when all gun owners get lumped in whenever a mass shooting happens.
Huh ? What ?
The people screaming against the Muslims are coming from all sides. Granted, the Fundamentalist Christian right has quite a few who are Muslim-haters...But, I've heard many Christian fundies stick up for Muslims too. And all gun owners are not trashing the Muslim community. Tons of Libertarians and Conservatives are pointing out that this is more likely a form of false flag.
The way you are painting broad strokes is actually what racists and bigots do.
Funny how you knee jerk to the 'Christian Right' and miss out the genocidal Zionists. Since the second target for Zionists are Christian patriots, your silence comes as no surprise.
I don't think you comprehend my comment, because yours makes no sense.
I just want to point out to all those calling for the extermination of all muslims.
Your rhetoric sounds just like the Hutu extremists in Rwanda just before the genocide. It sounds just like the Nazis just before the death camps. Just like all the propaganda bullshit before every genocide in history.
You are calling for mass murder.
FUCK YOU!
Terminus C
Actually, you are right. Anyone calling for the killing of all Muslims is a little bit extreme. Perhaps we can offer Muslims what Mohamed offered Christians, Jews and other Infidels. They can convert to Chrisitianity, Buddism, Hinduism, Atheism, whatever, or we lop off their heads.
Gee, I wonder how that tiny, weany little story in West, Texas is going.
Calm down. Most people are venting. And as far offering up free sex- you're not my type.
Regards,
K
"Anyone calling for the killing of all Muslims is a little bit extreme"
Death to Extremists!
Now, that is funny.
+1
We need to stop blaming social organization and philosophy for the actions of idiots and crazies. A violent homicidal/suicidal person need only look to the voices in their head for reasons to carry out acts of violence. Even if they don't belong to an organization that promotes violence, they will find a reason. If you trace all the suspected perpetrators of these acts, McVeih, 9/11 patsies, Palestinians, etc. you will find a person that wants to sacrifice for some cause. It doesn't matter the cause, the person is the issue. We make this argument when we fight against gun control. It is not the gun, it is not the knife, it is not the pressure cooker, it is the brain and hands. Blaming atributes of a person does no good. Blame it on the ability of that person to make good social choices.
I can no longer read this man's articles because they are laced with Mainstream Lies. To speak as if the 19 hijackers were actually the perpetrators of 9/11 is the telltale sign of acquisance to Mainstream Lifestyles and Media. I've been giving this guy the benefit of the doubt, but it happens too often.
These two kids they are pinning the Boston bombs on will never get a fair trial....One is already dead and the other may die and if he does not he will be interrogated (aka tortured) until he agrees with everything they tell him.
There has been no evidence these kids did this except for what we are told by the FBI. The same FBI that had been in contact with these kids for the last 3 years.
The same FBI that is notorious for setting up Muslims with terror weapons and then arresting them. Visit the FBI official Website at FBI.GOV and search for Michael Aaron Llaneza, whom the FBI set up and then arrested in February 2013. Llaneza is mentally ill and was taught how to make bombs by the FBI.There are many others, as well as evidence (even the Mainstream media moguls, CBS and NY Times verified this) the FBI was involved in the 1993 attack on the WTC.
If you are someone who does not believe in the Presumption of Innocence, then give yourself a pat on the back, because you are in the company of millions of Dumbed-down Americans. But it's getting beyond ridiculous that people are soaking up, without giving it a thought, whatever the Law-Enforcers tell them.
+1000 more
Ive tried to give him the benefit of the doubt as well. It appeared as if he was just riding this fine line, balancing himself between two worlds. I would think he knows better at this point though, GW is just struggling with the good guys being the boogie man. I was there once too but eventually you have to call it how it is and not be concerned with appeasing those who chose to turn a blind eye to all the evidence....
After the Newtown incident, the sloppiness of the acting, how can anyone trust what they see on mainstream...period
9/11 was a false flag. several of the supposed hijackers were found alive after the fact.
FBI was involved with the first WTC bombing
Oklahoma was a false flag
tonkin was a false flag
pearl harbor was 'allowed' to happen (complacency is as bad as initiating the act when you are capable of preventing it)
'operation northwoods' was a [proposal] for a false flag
Not to mention Maj Gen Butlers "War is a racket" speech
Not to mention WWII General & 2 term president Eisnehower warnings: http://youtu.be/CWiIYW_fBfY
I think the odd behavior with the Boston bombings is the kid being at the gym and going to parties after the fact... you just dont do that. Maybe after you have conditioned yourself to disengage from reality, but from my personal experience, that takes a lot of exposure to the very incident you are experiencing... frankly he is too young to have had that. very strange indeed.
But I carry no pedigrees, no PHD in psychology, so what do I know...
choosing the red pill sucks...
Having followed George's posts and his blog for a number of years and noticed a definite change in his style, I can't help but wonder if he got "an offer he couldn't refuse" from the Dept. of Misinformation. There's lots of money being spent by the Feds and the Zionists these day to redirect our attention away from the obvious. Is George driving a new car?
You don't need a PhD for this stuff. I give yours a +2000!! Thanks