This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

Glenn Beck Claims to Give the Government Until Monday to Come Clean on Saudi National

CrownThomas's picture




 

In the chaotic timeline of events that took place after the Boston bombing, one story that circulated was that a Saudi National had been take into custody and labeled a "Person of Interest". Apparently he was kept under heavy guard at the hospital, and his apartment was searched.

Since then the story has died down. However on Friday, Glenn Beck said on his radio show that he has information on this person, and that there is something going on behind the scenes that the Government is trying to keep us in the dark on (raise your hand if you'd be surprised).

He says in the following clip, that the Government has until tomorrow to come clean on the details, or else he will.

Does he have anything of substance? We'll soon find out.

 

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Sun, 04/21/2013 - 17:31 | 3481355 mofreedom
mofreedom's picture

I love Beck.  What else a recovering alchy gonna do but what he does, he found religion whatever that may be, that's his business.  I'll recover later, as every day, I picked the wrong day to stop sniffing glue.  And stand up for Israel, dear GOD how dare he, how dare he, those people balh, blah balh.

Sun, 04/21/2013 - 17:13 | 3481282 eddiebe
eddiebe's picture

I give the gov. 24 hours to ezplain what they did with the gold market, or else!! ( And I mean it!)

Sun, 04/21/2013 - 22:48 | 3482404 hannah
hannah's picture

"I give the gov. 24 hours to ezplain..."....ezplain..?....rucy now what do you did with my gold coins.  aaaaaw ricky. i sold them the other day.....(lucy then crys). ricky throws his hands into the air.......

Sun, 04/21/2013 - 17:09 | 3481265 CheapBastard
CheapBastard's picture

Evidently, rumor has it another 'person of interest' is still at large:

 

http://www.filmonpaper.com/site/media/2011/02/Borat_quad_beach-2.jpg

Sun, 04/21/2013 - 17:36 | 3481362 GMadScientist
GMadScientist's picture

If you look at the "before picture", you can clearly see he was entirely covered in hair before the blast and only looks like that now.

 

Sun, 04/21/2013 - 17:08 | 3481253 GOSPLAN HERO
GOSPLAN HERO's picture

President Frank Marshall Davis Obama is an honest man.

Sun, 04/21/2013 - 16:56 | 3481222 FinalCollapse
FinalCollapse's picture

The official story stinks. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to punch holes in the official FBI fabrication however any serious allegation needs to be iron clad.

I hope Beck has something of substance to show - if he's alive by Monday. 

Sun, 04/21/2013 - 19:56 | 3481765 Lost Word
Lost Word's picture

At Activistpost.com the question is asked, why did the FBI ask for the public to identify the bombing suspects, when the FBI had already previously investigated one brother and presumably the whole family?

The FBI didn't know that they had already previously investigated the suspect?

FBI caught in another monstrous treasonous Lie.

Sun, 04/21/2013 - 17:46 | 3481393 Bear
Bear's picture

Will Beck fo the way of Breitbart?

Sun, 04/21/2013 - 19:08 | 3481623 Yen Cross
Yen Cross's picture

 Apples & Oranges / Bear

Sun, 04/21/2013 - 17:15 | 3481288 dark pools of soros
dark pools of soros's picture

TPTB do like to get out the truth in channels that most people don't take serious but it provides the conditioning that even if it was true no one can do anything about it

That is the primary objective... To more and more enforce its will in plain sight. Boiling frogs

Sun, 04/21/2013 - 16:52 | 3481218 KingdomKum
KingdomKum's picture

 

 

Tar Baby ain't saying nothing . . .

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Br%27er_Rabbit_and_Tar-Baby.jpg

Sun, 04/21/2013 - 16:58 | 3481232 knukles
knukles's picture

Owww weee, massah, that be mighty loaded there!

Sun, 04/21/2013 - 19:07 | 3481619 ISEEIT
ISEEIT's picture

Oh shizzle meh nizzle....

Whooopie

Sun, 04/21/2013 - 16:55 | 3481213 Quinvarius
Quinvarius's picture

They will just deny Glenn Beck exists.  Then Micheal Moore will make a low production value documentary where he stands outside of a Glenn Beck believer's home with a bull horn yelling obscenities and invented facts. 

Sun, 04/21/2013 - 17:38 | 3481367 GMadScientist
GMadScientist's picture

FOX is just jealous Moore came up with the schtick first.

Sun, 04/21/2013 - 17:01 | 3481235 FinalCollapse
FinalCollapse's picture

The corruption of our government is so bad that we may see the two opposities like: Moore and Beck to shake hands actually. Michael Moore is on record saying that "Obama is much worse than Bush".

Sun, 04/21/2013 - 17:44 | 3481385 Midas
Midas's picture

I will take your word that M. Moore did give that opinion on Obama, but that is news to me.  I had no idea he disagrees with BHO.  I don't follow him of course, but I was well aware of his contempt for GWB and I wasn't following M. Moore back then either.  When he makes a movie about Barry's drone killing of minors I will agree with you 100%.

Sun, 04/21/2013 - 17:48 | 3481401 Bear
Bear's picture

Michael Moore disagrees with almost everybody ... that's his business

Sun, 04/21/2013 - 17:51 | 3481411 DosZap
DosZap's picture

Michael Moore disagrees with almost everybody ... that's his business

 

 

Michael Moore ranks with the top elite Libtards, he could a brother to Bloomberg.

Sun, 04/21/2013 - 17:29 | 3481339 Freddie
Freddie's picture

Moore constantly says whites are to blame for everything.  He must be terrified of black people because he constantly mouths that shit.

Sun, 04/21/2013 - 18:04 | 3481449 yabyum
yabyum's picture

Freddie, Come out from your folks basement. The vitamin d will help your paranoia.

Sun, 04/21/2013 - 17:16 | 3481295 Winston of Oceania
Winston of Oceania's picture

If he didn't he risks becoming irrelevant

Sun, 04/21/2013 - 16:51 | 3481206 Magnum
Magnum's picture

Beck puts a great deal of effort into discrediting anyone who mentions the obvious WTC7 setup on 9/11, and his total disregard of Ron Paul was inexcusable.  Fuck him.

Sun, 04/21/2013 - 19:42 | 3481731 moneybots
moneybots's picture

"Beck puts a great deal of effort into discrediting anyone who mentions the obvious WTC7 setup on 9/11"

 

There was no obvious WTC7 setup.  Debris from a collapsing WTC1 fell into WTC7, starting fires, just as debris fell onto other WTC buildings, starting fires.  The NYFD abandoned the idea of fighting the fires in WTC7, having lost 343 firemen in the collapse of WTC 1and 2.

One guy popped up later, claiming he heard a countdown and was told to run for his life.  One just has to look at a video shot from an apartment directly north of WTC7 to notice that the street was totally empty for blocks north of WTC7.  I would guess the guy wasn't anywhere near WTC7 when it fell, if he was even in Manhattan at the time.

 

Sun, 04/21/2013 - 21:28 | 3482061 PrintemDano
PrintemDano's picture

All mental patients may proceed to down arrow.

Sun, 04/21/2013 - 20:48 | 3481911 WTFx10
WTFx10's picture

I guess you missed that 40 story luxury hotel fire in Chechnya a couple of weeks ago?

The whole fucking side was on FIRE all 40 Fucking floors and it DID NOT FALL DOWN. DIDN'T even fucking lean over.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2013/04/03/russia-chechnya-high...

Now STFU asshole. Because you can not change physics with a lie.

 

Sun, 04/21/2013 - 21:45 | 3482176 moneybots
moneybots's picture

So the luxury hotel didn't fall down.  It was not constructed in the same manner as WTC7.  WTC7 had no concrete core.   The part of the Windsor Tower which collapsed was not concrete reinforced.  It collapsed all the way down to a special slab floor at the 20th floor.  The collapse would have contined except for the special slab floor.

All buildings are not constructed the same, so the fact that one did not fall does not prove that another one will not.

 

Physics cannot be changed with the lie that all steel buildings are the same.

Sun, 04/21/2013 - 21:41 | 3482097 PrintemDano
PrintemDano's picture

The buildings were designed different,  The WTC had a huge fucking plane full of fuel oil cut all fire suppression..Burns pretty fucking hot, steel beams on outer portion of building [the different design] which supported the floors expands when heated, when it expands it has to bend.  The supports can't bend in to the building because the floors are there, they had to bend out, thus removing all support for the floor, this caused the floor to collapse onto the floor below it.  The weakened floor below it it's beams also weakened now had to carry double the weight....couldn't happen, that collapsed onto the floor below it.  Get the picture dopey?   So unless you have some new physics that allows skyscraper floors to stay up with NOTHING supporting them,...shut your ignorant pie hole....If you get off your ass and read about why they DID fall with an open fucking mind you'd realize what a jack ass you and the rest of you nuts look like.  Stop reading only what you want to believe.  I suppose Bush tried blowing it up in 93 also.  Fucking moron.   http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/jom/0112/eagar/eagar-0112.html

Mon, 04/22/2013 - 05:35 | 3482908 bunnyswanson
bunnyswanson's picture

A YouTube clip is available showing a woman standing on the ledge of the gapping hole where impact was made. 

Another pic shows a man and a 2nd person standing on the beams of their floors at same impact site. 

 The heat you describe would make it impossible for these people to stand there and hold onto hot steel beams.  Lady's hair was not moving so no breeze was keeping them cool.  Explain that wise guy.

Mon, 04/22/2013 - 04:23 | 3482872 WTFx10
WTFx10's picture

Hes was talking about wtc7, NO FUCKINFG PLANE HIT IT. NO FUCKING FUEL WAS BURNING IN IT.

NO BUILDING FIRE WILL MELT STEEL.

Lies don't change physics.

Do they give believers like you gold stars for obiedience you fucking poor excuse for a human being?

THE WTC building all had STEEL cores TOO so where did you get your building plans?

Sun, 04/21/2013 - 21:54 | 3482209 Magnum
Magnum's picture

Your link is one guy's explanation of the collapse, written in December 2001, and does not even mention WTC7 which was NOT hit by a plane.  I doubt the author even knew about WTC7 and it would be interesting to know if he does today.  Mountains of material has been written since.  Get with the times!

Thousands of architects, engineers and scientists have written extensively about WTC7.  The truly massive structure fell straight down at free-fall speed, while others turned to dust, all of this defies physics.  

The NIST report has been completely discredited yet there is no debate, the media is absolutely silent, Glenn Beck won't even say a single word about WTC7.  On the internet any time specific well-reasoned scientific information is presented, the only comeback is similar to yours "ah come on that's dopey talk are you crazy and stuff, you believe in UFOs too?"  Nonsense.  

This is a very corrosive issue that needs an open discussion.  The media silence equates to complicity.  To add insult to injury the 9/11 Commission Report did not even mention WTC7.  The entire story stinks to high heaven.  Don't be fooled about "jet fuel" let's talk about the molten steel that burned for days afterward.

When scientists and architects are derided as kooks, something is very wrong with the picture.

http://www.bollyn.com/solving-9-11-the-book/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZG_ePshHA8o&feature=gv&hl=en

Sun, 04/21/2013 - 22:34 | 3482365 moneybots
moneybots's picture

"Thousands of architects, engineers and scientists have written extensively about WTC7.  The truly massive structure fell straight down at free-fall speed, while others turned to dust, all of this defies physics."

 

No physics were defied, as the laws of physics cannot be defied.  It is a phony claim of wishful thinking.

 

I would suggest you look at the huge pile of steel that landed in and around WTC1 and 2.  The steel did not turn to dust.  Tons of falling steel is going to pulverize concrete slab floors.  No laws of physics broken there.

WTC7 fell straight down.  That is what gravity does, it pulls straight down.  No law of physics being broken there. 

The 9/11 report did not mention WTC7-  WTC7 was not the target of the hijackers,  the two Towers were.  No one was in WTC7 when it collapsed.  It was a side story.

 

 

Mon, 04/22/2013 - 01:58 | 3482467 Magnum
Magnum's picture

Architects have articulated in great detail on this subject of steel-framed buildings and the impossibility of WTC7 collapsing into it's own footprint.

http://www.ae911truth.org/

The huge pile of steel you reference was cut apart and sold to China as fast as possible, without any analysis.  Bill Manning of Fire Engineering Magazine wrote in January 2002 an article "Selling Out the Investigation".

http://globalresearch.ca/articles/MAN309A.html

If only there were an analysis of that steel....  Fact is there was ... NONE.

Any story explaining how fires brought down WTC7 defies physics.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zv7BImVvEyk

WTC7 is the most blatantly obvious lie but the entire story doesn't add up.  Read Bollyn's work I referenced.

Sun, 04/21/2013 - 17:56 | 3481418 Bear
Bear's picture

This attitude is a real contributing factor the Great Move to the Left. Those who see the .gov as the problem are so fractured and focused (on single issues) that traction cannot be gain in any positive direction so the Commander and Chief (Mouth) always wins the day as we end up squabbling with one another. United we stand, divided we fall ... a lesson for the Right from the Left

Sun, 04/21/2013 - 16:47 | 3481199 paint it red ca...
paint it red call it hell's picture

Beck is a political flasher.

If he has anything of substance THIS TIME, I will be amazed.

Sun, 04/21/2013 - 16:53 | 3481217 Dr. Sandi
Dr. Sandi's picture

Glenn Beck, the political flasher with a iddy biddy, teeny tiny kernel of truth glued to his nether parts.

I'd probably like Beck if he'd stop rolling in bullshit on his journey to enlightment.

Sun, 04/21/2013 - 17:27 | 3481328 Freddie
Freddie's picture

The rest of the media is on total lockdown on this story.  They are saying nothing.  

Beck may have access to people in the govt/military/intel who actually know what is going on and they may have leaked it to him.   Let's see if he has anything.

Sun, 04/21/2013 - 18:29 | 3481510 The Heart
The Heart's picture

Aye thar Freddie, tis true that time be a telling all tings.

Grandstanding he be...or a Grand Stand it be.

Ahoy, CHANGE!!!!!!

Sun, 04/21/2013 - 18:21 | 3481486 Cathartes Aura
Cathartes Aura's picture

Glenn Beck 2016!!

Sun, 04/21/2013 - 17:43 | 3481326 DeadFred
DeadFred's picture

One way to discredit the truth is to have a clown pronounce it far and wide. I've often wondered if that is Beck's role in life. Okay Glenn, I give you until Monday to put up or shut up. Will we see something important or will we have an 'Anonymous rats out BofA type non-event'? You will go up hugely in my eyes if this is not a hoax.

Sun, 04/21/2013 - 18:14 | 3481469 DosZap
DosZap's picture

Wahtever your opinion of Beck is, I admire him for ONE reason.

He did more on Fox News to teach the Sheeple about  the REAL America's founders, and history of our country(not the PC BS we hear today), and the roles of the black Americans had in our history.

 

Sun, 04/21/2013 - 20:15 | 3481826 Common_Cents22
Common_Cents22's picture

no kidding,  geez there are a bunch of overly jaded fucks on ZH.   People bitch about Beck when the rest of the media is overrun by whacked out socialists/communists/useful idiots????   Do people want Dan Rather and fucks like him back instead??

Beck is head and shoulders better than 99% of the media.  Yet people bitch.   Probably same people would bitch about paying taxes after they win the powerball too.

Sun, 04/21/2013 - 21:20 | 3482082 surf0766
surf0766's picture

They are blinded by their hatred of others.  I listened to Beck for the first time in 2005 when he had John Williams on from shadowstats. John Williams was the reason I listened that day.I continue to listen today.  I do not always agree with him, but no one will ever agree with anyone 100% of the time. People on here think that it is possible for the 100% agreement to happen. It is not.

I stand with Beck.

 

Sun, 04/21/2013 - 19:32 | 3481696 ronaldawg
ronaldawg's picture

Beck was the ONLY one to call out Bernanke for lying about monetizing the debt.

Sun, 04/21/2013 - 17:12 | 3481272 Winston of Oceania
Winston of Oceania's picture

It's not easy to wake up and choose the red pill, not easy at all.

Sun, 04/21/2013 - 17:23 | 3481321 Cathartes Aura
Cathartes Aura's picture

this "red pill" that's so talk'd about, folks might realise that "waking up" is incremental, and it's fuckin' deep, always has been.

Sun, 04/21/2013 - 17:10 | 3481263 Cathartes Aura
Cathartes Aura's picture

agreed, it's kinda hard to make out Beck's nether parts with the HUGE SKULL 'n' CROSSBONES cummerbund flashin'

he's well known for his advertisements.

Sun, 04/21/2013 - 19:35 | 3481706 Pool Shark
Pool Shark's picture

 

 

It would help his credibility to dump Goldline as a sponsor.

 

Sun, 04/21/2013 - 16:46 | 3481195 Papasmurf
Papasmurf's picture

He lost me years ago when we were hopping from square to square on fox.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!