This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
Everyone’s Talking about “False Flags … Isn’t that Another Bogus Historical Conspiracy Theory?
More people are using the term “false flag” than ever before.
Some claim that the Boston marathon bombing, 9/11 and the Oklahoma City bombing were false flag attacks.
Others claim that anyone who uses the phrase “false flag” is a nut conspiracy theorist.
This post does not discuss Boston, 9/11 or Oklahoma City. It simply looks at whether there is any real historical concept regarding false flags.
What Is False Flag Terror?
“False flag terrorism” is defined as a government attacking its own people, then blaming others in order to justify going to war against the people it blames. Or as Wikipedia defines it:
False flag operations are covert operations conducted by governments, corporations, or other organizations, which are designed to appear as if they are being carried out by other entities. The name is derived from the military concept of flying false colors; that is, flying the flag of a country other than one’s own. False flag operations are not limited to war and counter-insurgency operations, and have been used in peace-time; for example, during Italy’s strategy of tension.
The term comes from the old days of wooden ships, when one ship would hang the flag of its enemy before attacking another ship in its own navy. Because the enemy’s flag, instead of the flag of the real country of the attacking ship, was hung, it was called a “false flag” attack.
Indeed, this concept is so well-accepted that rules of engagement for naval, air and land warfare all prohibit false flag attacks.
Leaders Throughout History Have Acknowledged False Flags
Leaders throughout history have acknowledged the danger of false flags:
“This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when he first appears he is a protector.”
- Plato
“If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.”
- U.S. President James Madison
“Terrorism is the best political weapon for nothing drives people harder than a fear of sudden death”.
- Adolph Hitler
“Why of course the people don’t want war … But after all it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship … Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”
- Hermann Goering, Nazi leader.
“The easiest way to gain control of a population is to carry out acts of terror. [The public] will clamor for such laws if their personal security is threatened”.
- Josef Stalin
Governments from Around the World ADMIT that they Carry Out False Flag Terror
But don’t take our word for it.
Governments from around the world admit they carry out false flag terror:
- A major with the Nazi SS admitted at the Nuremberg trials that – under orders from the chief of the Gestapo – he and some other Nazi operatives faked attacks on their own people and resources which they blamed on the Poles, to justify the invasion of Poland. Nazi general Franz Halder also testified at the Nuremberg trials that Nazi leader Hermann Goering admitted to setting fire to the German parliament building, and then falsely blaming the communists for the arson
- The CIA admits that it hired Iranians in the 1950′s to pose as Communists and stage bombings in Iran in order to turn the country against its democratically-elected prime minister
- Israel admits that an Israeli terrorist cell operating in Egypt planted bombs in several buildings, including U.S. diplomatic facilities, then left behind “evidence” implicating the Arabs as the culprits (one of the bombs detonated prematurely, allowing the Egyptians to identify the bombers, and several of the Israelis later confessed) (and see this and this)
- The former Italian Prime Minister, an Italian judge, and the former head of Italian counterintelligence admit that NATO, with the help of the Pentagon and CIA, carried out terror bombings in Italy and other European countries in the 1950s and blamed the communists, in order to rally people’s support for their governments in Europe in their fight against communism. As one participant in this formerly-secret program stated: “You had to attack civilians, people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple. They were supposed to force these people, the Italian public, to turn to the state to ask for greater security” (and see this)(Italy and other European countries subject to the terror campaign had joined NATO before the bombings occurred). And watch this BBC special
- As admitted by the U.S. government, recently declassified documents show that in the 1960′s, the American Joint Chiefs of Staff signed off on a plan to blow up AMERICAN airplanes (using an elaborate plan involving the switching of airplanes), and also to commit terrorist acts on American soil, and then to blame it on the Cubans in order to justify an invasion of Cuba. See the following ABC news report; the official documents; and watch this interview with the former Washington Investigative Producer for ABC’s World News Tonight with Peter Jennings.
- 2 years before, American Senator George Smathers had suggested that the U.S. make “a false attack made on Guantanamo Bay which would give us the excuse of actually fomenting a fight which would then give us the excuse to go in and [overthrow Castro]“.
- And Official State Department documents show that – only nine months before the Joint Chiefs of Staff plan was proposed – the head of the Joint Chiefs and other high-level officials discussed blowing up a consulate in the Dominican Republic in order to justify an invasion of that country. The 3 plans were not carried out, but they were all discussed as serious proposals
- The South African Truth and Reconciliation Council found that, in 1989, the Civil Cooperation Bureau (a covert branch of the South African Defense Force) approached an explosives expert and asked him “to participate in an operation aimed at discrediting the ANC [the African National Congress] by bombing the police vehicle of the investigating officer into the murder incident”, thus framing the ANC for the bombing
- An Algerian diplomat and several officers in the Algerian army admit that, in the 1990s, the Algerian army frequently massacred Algerian civilians and then blamed Islamic militants for the killings (and see this video; and Agence France-Presse, 9/27/2002, French Court Dismisses Algerian Defamation Suit Against Author)
- Senior Russian Senior military and intelligence officers admit that the KGB blew up Russian apartment buildings and falsely blamed it on Chechens, in order to justify an invasion of Chechnya (and see this report and this discussion)
- According to the Washington Post, Indonesian police admit that the Indonesian military killed American teachers in Papua in 2002 and blamed the murders on a Papuan separatist group in order to get that group listed as a terrorist organization.
- The well-respected former Indonesian president also admits that the government probably had a role in the Bali bombings
- As reported by BBC, the New York Times, and Associated Press, Macedonian officials admit that the government murdered 7 innocent immigrants in cold blood and pretended that they were Al Qaeda soldiers attempting to assassinate Macedonian police, in order to join the “war on terror”.
- Although the FBI now admits that the 2001 anthrax attacks were carried out by one or more U.S. government scientists, a senior FBI official says that the FBI was actually told to blame the Anthrax attacks on Al Qaeda by White House officials (remember what the anthrax letters looked like). Government officials also confirm that the white House tried to link the anthrax to Iraq as a justification for regime change in that country
- Former Department of Justice lawyer John Yoo suggested in 2005 that the US should go on the offensive against al-Qaeda, having “our intelligence agencies create a false terrorist organization. It could have its own websites, recruitment centers, training camps, and fundraising operations. It could launch fake terrorist operations and claim credit for real terrorist strikes, helping to sow confusion within al-Qaeda’s ranks, causing operatives to doubt others’ identities and to question the validity of communications.”
- United Press International reported in June 2005:
U.S. intelligence officers are reporting that some of the insurgents in Iraq are using recent-model Beretta 92 pistols, but the pistols seem to have had their serial numbers erased. The numbers do not appear to have been physically removed; the pistols seem to have come off a production line without any serial numbers. Analysts suggest the lack of serial numbers indicates that the weapons were intended for intelligence operations or terrorist cells with substantial government backing. Analysts speculate that these guns are probably from either Mossad or the CIA. Analysts speculate that agent provocateurs may be using the untraceable weapons even as U.S. authorities use insurgent attacks against civilians as evidence of the illegitimacy of the resistance.
- Quebec police admitted that, in 2007, thugs carrying rocks to a peaceful protest were actually undercover Quebec police officers
- At the G20 protests in London in 2009, a British member of parliament saw plain clothes police officers attempting to incite the crowd to violence
- A Colombian army colonel has admitted that his unit murdered 57 civilians, then dressed them in uniforms and claimed they were rebels killed in combat
- U.S. soldiers have admitted that if they kill innocent Iraqis and Afghanis, they then “drop” automatic weapons near their body so they can pretend they were militants
The Bottom Line
The bottom line is that governments from around the world have – according to their own admissions – carried out false flags.
Any discussion about a specific terrorist attack cannot start with the assumption that it couldn’t be a false flag attack, or that it must be a false flag attack.
The facts of each attack must be examined on their own merits before reaching any conclusion.
»
- advertisements -
Sorry you clearly can't use something you obviously don't have.
You must know a lot about imbicility, having practiced it so much.
Use Occam's Razor- your beard is to shaggy.
What's the most simple explanation for the events, bubt, also one that takes into account all the facts?
here is the official story:
Two self-radicalized Chechens with no experience at all with explosives or weapons use the internet to pump themselves up and to build explosive devices. They obtain assault weapons, whihch they cache someplace, and then blow shit up.
They also have access to intelligence thatv tells them there will be massive drills and simulations rolling simultaneously with theur own plans.
They have successful and elaborate cover stories that are effective in neutralizing the FBI surveillance teams who constantly follow them.
They have financial backing, supposedly from a terrorist organization- oh wait, they are acting entirely on their own- ooops, story begins to break down. Where the fuck DID they get the money? From wifey, who works 80 hrs a week as a bed-pan emptier?
Take-away: Two kids acting on their own, but who have super-human access to intellligence, super-human skill at avoiding surveillance, and lots of money.
Conspiracy theory: Gov't planned false flag.
Resources-check.
Motive- check
Opportunity- check
Just like 9-11, the official story doesn't add up. For people who are conditioned into the willing suspension of disbelief, it works. As you so eloquently put it, they don't use their fucking brains. Go troll somewhere else, and shave off that beard!
You only prove my point.
WTF man. I always question our corrupt government, but just think for a moment about what you are saying. Why would the plotters need to provide fake victims of a real bomb blast and why would they put themselves in the blast zone and risk real injury. This is the kind of crazy stupid shit that naysayers use to discredit all "conspiracy theorist". When you are congenitally stupid you should leave the investigations to the more competent
You're the one who's dense. Here is how it works:
1. Set up a drill, complete with actors, simulated bomb, bomb squads, etc. All the playyers in the drill are compartmentalized- they aren't told the real plans. they THINK it's a drill, the whole time.
2A. The real bomb(s) go(es) off, and then the simulated plans and real events transpire simultaneously.
2B. There is no real bomb. Instead, the entire simulation is TREATED/HANDLED as if it were a real explosion.
2C. Glitches. The fake bomb actually hurts people. After all, something has to go bang, which carries risks. No worries, treat the explosions as if they were a real event.
So, you can glean the answers to your questions form the above.
Why would the plotters need to provide fake victims of a real bomb blast?
They don't, but they have unwitting actors on hand, who help add drama to the event.
The simulation comes off as planned, but its handled as a genuine event- the actors are told after the fact to shut the fuck up, or else.
Why would they put themselves in the blast zone and risk real injury?
The actors are patsies too. They signed on for a simulation. They didn't know any better. They went to the locations they were told to go to, and played out their parts they way they're trained to play them. The actors weren't in on the real plan.
Take-away: The best terrorist attack is one that doesn't hurt anyone. After all, terror is a psychological condition- if that mental state can be induced without actual casualties, so much the better. People like being scared, especially if they know they're going to be safe- eg horror movies. By the looks of it, Bostonians really dug being under martial law. They looked like Ukranians welcoming the SS. I'd say, from the viewpoint of an ELITE CONTROLLER, that the whole event was amsashing success. So maybe there's a few thousand who question the official narrative. They can be tracked, monitored and eliminated at leisure. Everyone ellse will open the door, let the black-suited psychopaths in, and hand over their guns.
An illustrative example: Psychological Impact
You, in a large and nasty looking building, have prisoners in room A next to, and some distance off, but separate from people in room B.
Prisoners are threatened in room A. When they don't talk are removed to Room B, some distance off, vague voices can be heard, some distinctly, especially those of the questioning interrogator(s).
Screaming and sounds of beatings in room B are heard by room A prisoners. Laughter, mocking, and casual talk by the interrogators. Eventually, after what seems to be screams from torture, for quite some period, prisoners in room A hear load requests for more information from prisoners in room B. After more screaming and what sounds like vicious beatings, questions are asked again, there are NO responses, gunshots ring out, then total silence.
Meanwhile, a trench is dug outside, some distance off, which the prisoners in room A can see off in the distance. Later, what looks like a body, limp and lifeless, wrapped in canvas, with some blood dripping, are carelessly thrown in the trench and urinated on.
The guards return to room A after about an hour and a half, and ask for more information from the room A prisoners, then take the next man/women who refuses to talk.
Does it matter if the prisoners in room B were not tortured, beaten, or if they were moved somewhere else without a scratch, and never shot or tortured?
What if the screams and sounds of beatings were staged? The psychological damage is close to the same, especially if they never see the prisoner(s) from room A again.
It's like the boggy-man in the closet that kids are so afraid of, he may not exist, but the fear is real.
So, lets say there was damage, injury and some death from the Marathon bombing, or it was less than what appeared, but was then AMPed-up, dramatized, for maximum effect. Some (few) actors on the scene increased the look of carnage, increasing the impact. This may be possible.
Just a thought. Anything is possible when you don't know.
Here is some more stuff to go with this.
That is the army vet's guy's page.
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Nick-Vogt-Family/178392405583759?fref=ts
Here is the interesting thing the farewell post is on April 3rd
Then all the people posting he is one and the same inundate the photos section, it is hidden off the timeline.
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Nick-Vogt-Family/178392405583759?sk=photos
Now here is one for Jeff after he got his legs blown off
https://www.facebook.com/supportjeffandfamily?ref=stream
Everyone can decide on their own but wheeling both out together for a press conference would put this to bed. I may have to back track off my original premise after digging more here.
His father is sending up a bunch of red flags. He has 2 facebook pages
https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1104230518
https://www.facebook.com/bauman60
He is in 2 locations at once it looks like, definately something going on with him, to many commonalities between friends and family members when you tie him back to the son and other facebook pages also a shitload of contradictory information on each page contradicting the same things on the same page. I don't know if he is involved in this but he is not a civilian when you add all this together.
Frankly my original thoughts might not be right but something don't sit right with this whole situation concerning that kid, that is what my gut feeling is anyways. I'm just trying to find out where the truth lies here.
Good work DCH. As for me, I too avoid FB like the plague..
Well done for mining Facebook for information
Rather you than me, I can't stand the thing
"This must not leave this room. Andy Kaufman is Tony Clifton." -- The movie 'Man in the Moon'.
My bad...I didn't fully ready your post and jumped to conclusion lol...
Oh yeah, dood, it's always a "drill" --- just like all those incredible number of drills on 9/11/01, beginning with the drill over at the NRO, which conveniently emptied out their operations center so no spy sat could be manually tasked to observe the air space above NYC or the Pentagon.
Yup, it's always about those drills.......
Then there are the odd facebook pages.
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Memorial-For-Nuke-Event-in-LA-April-28th/353093098124193
There no conclusive proof it is a false flag either, I know for a fact the military does do drills like these for training and will simulate everything right down to blown off limbs for realism, they do hire civilians and ex military to participate as actors. That I know 100% for a fact knowing people personally who have participated in these types of combat training on major bases where they set up whole environments. Fact of the matter is believe what you want but that body of evidence on the wheelchair kid would stand up in a court of law, that is not tinfoil hat paranoia digital dickweed stuff.
CERT or Community Emergency Response Training is a DHS sponsored national programs. They do drills and simulations and recently I was shocked/surprised at the how grusome simulated injuries were. This is really getting strange.
The guy in the wheelchair definitely had fake legs that were taken off or blown off and he is definitely NOT Jeff Bauman in the media photos. I'm starting to think that the actors that were there for who-knows-what were as surprised as anybody at the way it all played out.
I do NOT buy anything CLOSE to the MSM story on this, but I just looked at the photos...Dude, the guy's left leg has half the tibia sticking out with no flesh and the thigh muscle on his right leg is hanging like loose shorts off his right femur...looks like recent trauma to me.
Check out the guy in the wheelchair in this photo:
http://educate-yourself.org/cn/leg1edit1200w.jpg
404
I think that "tibia" is the support or the frame for the fake leg-look how straight it is, and look at the knee, it's smooth. and there is a piece of plastic or whatever fake legs ae made from-not muscle in one photo that is just hanging from the knee. and the plastic around the "tibia" was burned away from the heat of the blast or whatever.
There is a must watch series at boiling frogs post about Operation Gladio. Check it out you will be sickened.