This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
The U.S. Is Supporting the Most Violent Muslim Terrorists In Order to Wage War for Oil
Sunni Muslims commit more terrorist acts worldwide than any other group. For example, the National Counterterrorism Center’s 2011 Report on Terrorism found that:
Sunni extremists accounted for the greatest number of terrorist attacks and fatalities for the third consecutive year. More than 5,700 incidents were attributed to Sunni extremists, accounting for nearly 56 percent of all attacks and about 70 percent of all fatalities. Among this perpetrator group, al-Qa‘ida (AQ) and its affiliates were responsible for at least 688 attacks that resulted in almost 2,000 deaths, while the Taliban in Afghanistan and Pakistan conducted over 800 attacks that resulted in nearly 1,900 deaths. Secular, political, and anarchist groups were the next largest category of perpetrators, conducting 2,283 attacks with 1,926 fatalities, a drop of 5 percent and 9 percent, respectively, from 2010.
(Thankfully, the percentage of Muslim terror attacks in the U.S. is relatively small).
Saudi Arabia is the center of the Sunni branch of Islam. It is also the center of the most violent and radical sect of Islam … the “Wahhabis” (also called “Salafis”). But the U.S. has long supported the Madrassa schools within Saudi Arabia which teach radical Wahabi beliefs.
Indeed, the U.S. has directly inserted itself into a sectarian war between the two main Islamic sects, backing the “Sunnis” and attacking the “Shiites” (also called “Shia”). See this, this and this.
For example, American political leaders have been very close to Saudi (i.e. Sunni) leaders for decades:
Obama is no different:
Why? Because of Saudi oil. (Virtually all geopolitics are based on oil and other hydrocarbons.)
Indeed, (1) the Co-Chair of the Congressional Inquiry into 9/11 and former Head of the Senate Intelligence Committee, and (2) a former 6-year congressman and MSNBC talk show host have both said that – even if the Saudi government was behind 9/11 – we need Saudi oil too much to do anything about it.
Our backing of the most violent branch of Sunni Muslims has had real consequences:
- Our backing of Sunnis in Afghanistan and Saudi Arabia led to 9/11*
- Our backing of Sunni extremists in Chechnya led to the Boston bombings
- Our backing of Sunni extremists throughout the Middle East and North Africa has led to the persecution of Christians and Jews
And McClatchy interviewed an Al Qaeda terrorist fighting against the Syrian government – with U.S. backing – as saying:
When we finish with Assad, we will fight the U.S.!
Do you still doubt that the U.S. is supporting Sunni terrorists?
The U.S. National Security Adviser admitted that the U.S. created, organized and armed the Mujahadeen in Afghanistan – including Bin Laden and his lieutenants – to fight the Soviets. The Mujahadeen are predominately Sunni. The Mujahadeen eventually morphed into Al Qaeda, which is a Sunni organization.
During various times and places, the U.S. has also backed the Muslim Brotherhood … another Sunni group.
In addition, the American government has supported:
- Al Qaeda Sunni terrorists in Libya and Mali
- Sunni terrorists in Chechnya
- Sunni MEK terrorists in Iran
- Al Qaeda Sunnis in Bosnia
- The brutal Sunni government in Bahrain as it crushes its majority Shia population whenever it pushes for democratic reform
And the “rebels” in Syria who we’ve been supporting are Al Qaeda and Muslim Brotherhood.
The New York Times reports this week:
In Syria’s largest city, Aleppo, rebels aligned with Al Qaeda control the power plant, run the bakeries and head a court that applies Islamic law. Elsewhere, they have seized government oil fields, put employees back to work and now profit from the crude they produce.
Across Syria, rebel-held areas are dotted with Islamic courts staffed by lawyers and clerics, and by fighting brigades led by extremists. Even the Supreme Military Council, the umbrella rebel organization whose formation the West had hoped would sideline radical groups, is stocked with commanders who want to infuse Islamic law into a future Syrian government.
Nowhere in rebel-controlled Syria is there a secular fighting force to speak of.
Do you get it?
The government has taken away our liberties and destroyed our prosperity in order to fight an endless war on terror. Americans have become the most spied upon people in history. Never-ending war has destroyed our economy.
And yet the government has been arming, funding and otherwise backing the very terrorists who are carrying out the biggest percentage of terror attacks.
As we noted last year:
In the name of “fighting Al Qaeda or associated forces” or those who “support” those bad guys, the U.S. government has authorized:
- Assassinating people anywhere in the world without due process or even a legal charge . . .
- including U.S. citizens living on American soil
- Indefinitely detaining any American – without trial (and see this)
- Torturing people . . .
- including Americans living on American soil
- Labeling virtually any American as a “terrorist“
In other words, the government has shredded our constitution and destroyed our freedom and liberties in order to fight Al Qaeda and associated forces.
And yet the government is itself supporting – with money, arms, and logistical support – Al Qaeda and associated forces in a number of nations.
People who believe that we’re in a “new post-9/11 reality” should remember that everything happening now started before 9/11, and that current U.S. policy towards the Middle East and North Africa was determined many decades ago. It’s not just the Neocons who planned this strategy. Jimmy Carter’s National Security Adviser helped to map out the battle plan for Eurasian petroleum resources over a decade ago, and Obama is clearly continuing the same agenda.
Sadly – by any measure – the U.S. causes much more terror than we prevent … all to justify our geopolitical goals.
* The question of false flags is beyond the scope of this post.
»
- advertisements -
But why? Why would "they" want to kill everyone on the planet? To what ends? Either "they" are stupid (allowing intimate details of their "plan" for global domination spread on the web), bored (keeping dumb humanity around to play games with) or weak (can only mount "successes" like pressure cooker bombs) in which case they shouldn't be worrisome.
Because you are a useless eater. It's your fault, really.
But why? Why did I go for a smoke break when the Creator was givin out da brains\\///???
Right on, REALmario!
The legalized, privatized, power to make "money" out of nothing, as debts, while being able to have governments force everyone else to accept that fraud, is infinitely more valuable than any natural resource, since that financial system controls the social use of those resources. Clearly, the war for oil is important, but the war to control the power to make "money" out of nothing is more important!
One of the most remarkable admissions by a banker concerning the mysteries of his profession was made by Sir Josiah Stamp, president of the Bank of England and the second richest man in Britain in the 1920’s. Speaking at the University of Texas in 1927, he revealed:
"The modern banking system manufactures money out of nothing. The process is perhaps the most astounding piece of sleight of hand that was every invented. Banking was conceived in inequity and born in sin …. Bankers own the earth. Take it away from them but leave them the power to create money, and with a flick of a pen, they will create enough money to buy it back again …. Take this great power away from them and all great fortunes like mine will disappear, for then this would be a better and happier world to live in …. But if you want to continue to be the slaves of bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, then let bankers continue to create money and control credit."
The power to make money out of nothing is the supreme symbolic expression of the power to rob, which is backed up by the governments' powers to kill, because the banksters applied the methods of organized crime, in order to take control over governments, which included the most important form of murder, which was the assassination of those politicians which could not be bribed or intimidated. By those means, the government of the USA has been almost totally taken over by the transnational banksters, which are the supreme organized crime gang. Their supreme crime was to legalize their counterfeiting of the money supply. After they finally gained back that goal, and were able to hold onto that, then it was a cake walk for them to use their powers to take control over every other significant social institution, and especially the mass media.
The government of the USA today is based upon about 99% legalized lies, backed by legalized violence. That has become so totally unbalanced, by becoming so successful at doing it, that there are no feasible solutions to that problem ... The banksters are controlling what the American military do, as well as NATO. The banksters are controlling what the American militarized police are doing. That project is already about 99% accomplished, while I doubt that any more than a few percent of Americans currently understand that situation. Therefore, the future is surely going to be more genocidal wars, along with democidal martial law. The future for Americans is probably going to be more false flag terrorism events, and more deliberate destruction of the American economy, and more deliberate destruction of the American democratic republic.
The banksters are going to deliberately make things worse and worse everywhere, including inside of the USA, so that they can attempt to consolidate their control through overtly democidal martial law, as the supreme manifestation of debt slavery, backed by wars based on deceits. Since the debt slavery has been driven to become debt insanity, totally insane death controls, through democidal martial law, are clearly on the agenda for many Americans in the future. The gradual take over of their country by the transnational banksters is already a runaway system. The transnational banksters are getting away with one inside job after another. They are planning to destroy the status of the American dollar as the world's reserve currency. When that happens, the consequences through America will be devastating! After that happens, the banksters are planning to be able to mop up any American resistance, with another set of excuses to engage in mass murder of Americans, until there is no effective resistance left there, the same as none everywhere else that the banksters could have possibly done that.
As this plan becomes more brazenly open, it appears to be on the verge of being more widely recognized. However, I see no good reasons to believe it can be stopped now. I believe we are going to have to go through those events. However, I do not believe that the banksters actually are still in control of those systems that they originally made and maintained.
Overall, I think that we are going to see psychotic breakdowns, and collapse into chaos, and social storms blowing through which are beyond our ability to imagine. I do not believe that any group of human beings will be able to control those things, although there were groups of human beings that originally drove those things towards happening ...
I would like to think that enough human beings would start to understand how and WHY the banksters were able to do what they did, and therefore, to understand how and WHY the only genuinely good solutions to the chronic political problems are to achieve what the banksters did in ways that were better than the banksters have done.
The banksters evolved as the top carnivores in the human ecology, the Vicious Wolves, directing more Domesticated Dogs, that control the large numbers of people that act like Zombie Sheeple. In my opinion almost everybody who appears to oppose those banksters are Black Sheep, who propose no better solutions, because they have no sympathy for the devils, which are the roles that the banksters fulfil, as being the top carnivores in the human ecology systems.
In my opinion, this article by George Washington demonstrates that understanding of the insanity of the war on terror, and the corruption of the government of the USA, is on the verge of becoming something that enters some degree of mainstream awareness. This article is sort of about how the banksters, as the most Vicious Wolves, are using some Wild Dogs, to advance their interests. Of course, that is an extremely dangerous thing. However, the point of history having selected the banksters to be the top carnivores is that they are mentally able and willing to take those kinds of otherwise apparently insane risks.
However, meanwhile, the vast majority of Americans will probably continue to act like Zombie Sheeple, while the public opposition will continue being controlled by the mass media to be nothing more than Black Sheep. However, while that is happening, the real news about the combined money/murder system is getting so much more blatantly outrageous, that the sheer insanity of that is perhaps more on the verge of being somewhat admitted to be social facts by the mainstream. But nevertheless, I think that is still now too little, too late, to prevent this situation from going out of control of everyone, including even the banksters themselves. The same old games, of the Neolithic Civilization social pyramid systems, are being played through, EXCEPT they are being amplified trillions of times by advances in technologies, and NOBODY CAN UNDERSTAND THAT!
The biggest joke are the dummies that think because the West invades and pulverizes a country and seizes its oil that somehow gas is going to be cheaper.
What part of killing-millions-of-innocent-civilians-and-crippling-war-veterans-to-destroy-Third-World-infrastructure-with-lucrative-ordnance-so-they-can-profit-by-having-the-monopoly-to-replace-said-infrastructure-all-the-while-REMOVING-the-oil from-the-market-to-jack-up-prices-in-FRNs-to-keep-the-petro-ponzi-currency-afloat..... don’t they understand?
I understand it Radical, Human instinctual nature isn't changing, but technology is, that is why this time really,`Will be different`.
oil is only part of the deal.
GW,
You could have said that: US is supporting Muslims. This would have sufficed.
Your statement is senseless. There is a very real dichotomy in the Islamic world - a schism that has persisted for a millenium. And George is right, due to the distribution of oil reserves, the U.S. has acted in many ways to support Sunnis at the expense of Shiites. However, I think that this too ignores the real focus of U.S. policy vis-a-vis the ME - access to oil and global sales only in U.S. dollars. The fact that these objectives have resulted in the U.S. being cozier with Sunnis than Shiites is a mere accident - even if Bush did kiss the king. Both men worship the same god - money.
Yup... who needs to complicate things by going into needless details...
just kill anything what looks or acts different than you...an it's 'mission accomplished' ... a perfect example of a modern devolved merikan Obomber supporter. Snap card for the man!
There are online spell checkers, you know. Sometimes the message degenerates into strings of sloganeering - evil bankers, evil "merikan" (sharp there), "Obomber supporter" (cute but again, nothing but again, words without context)
you're really scraping now... ain'tcha>??
Sumpthin went right over yur head.... yu need more than 'spell checker' friend.
This piece smells like, looks like, feels like and tastes like the is a mole at zerohedge pushing bullshit. Sunnis are the recepients of most of our treacherry via support for dictators and apartheid states. If we follow the constitution and stop this reckless policy of creating conflicts, false flags and supporting questionable movements in foreign lands.. you will find muslims the best customers for our products... but we cannot label these people as terrorists when it was our policies that created them in the first place.
Stopping ALL foreign aid to everybody NOW and concetrate on trade and respectful relations .. will solve most every problem we face with terrorists.
Let freedom reign.
Not sure wtf you're talking about regarding a 'mole'(?) GW's been here just about as long as ZH has been here, so that's a bit of a stretch...
On Liberty for ALL - allow free market forces to solve some systemic problems? Allow a free market to shun bad players and reward good partners? pfffttt! Nope, we cannot trust a free market, haven't you been listening? The War on Terror, and the encouragment to foment anger, has done this nation so much good that we are good to go for another decade! Truly, nothing to see here, move along...
Here's the /sarc tag for those who need it.
GW has always had a soft spot for Shia Muslims - whether it's downplaying the human rights abuses of the Iranian theocracy or supporting Assad or telling us Iran is a pretty nation. I'll take him at his word that he is not a Muslim but it's strange that he'd omit the obvious: Outside of Iran and a few Gulf states, Sunnis are the overwhelming majority. Thus, radical elements will necessarily be Sunni. Note that he ignores the same kind of Shia terrorists. It's like announcing that the Irish bombers were Catholic - BFD.
GW denounces the "War on Terrorism", implying it's a Western invention in order to [ fill in blank ]. Yet when he can find some long-lost Sunni terrorists when the need arises Needless to say, nthe idea of an alliance with such "reputable allies" (lol) is absurd if only because it is not in our national interest. If it was up to the State Dept (or Israel) Assad's minority theocracy would remain in control in Syria. Better luck next time, GW.
does this mean you have a soft spot for everything else?
GW has a soft spot for the truth that isn't reported in the MSM. During the Iraq war, over 90% of the suicide bomb attacks were Sunni's attacking Shia. That's a fact. A huge portion of those suicide bombers were not even Iraqi, but came over from Saudi Arabia. That's also a fact. The MSM, however, doing the bidding of the American military, helped foment misinformation about the bombings. Most Americans, as a result, thought the bombers were Shia or equally divided between the two groups. They were not. Learn history and then try to dispute GW's facts. Until then, be grateful.
If it was up to the State Dept (or Israel)...
Merikan kids would be over in some far off country dying(as usual) on behalf of the delusions of grandeur(and plunder) of Israel and the usual MIC suspects...
your entire argument is beyond silly. Where's your 'soft spot'>???
Thanks for not reading what I wrote but for some, seeing the word "Israel" brings immediate foaming at the mouth. What I said was (1) there are also Shia terrorists, most of whom have official state sanction (2) Outside of Iran and the Gulf only Sunni can be found, thus radicalization will necessarily be Sunni and (3) GW has been carrying water for the theocracy in Iran for some time. I swear, if GW wrote that the moon was a 3D hoax (perpetrated by you know who) posters would give him a five star and savage anyone who dared to disagree All I'm asking for is something other than blind, group, slavish instant belief.
Ok Bizarro... yu got the stage.
"Iranian" Shia "Terrorists".... tell us what yu know.
And be specific... please.
Irish Bombers? Made n paid British Intelligence assets.... your previous post was garbage from the first line...and ended up as pure farce. Better luck next time.
Islam, the mob, the US constitutional compact, and certain street gangs are the only groups you can join which will kill you if you try to leave them. Only one wants to bring everyone into the group.
'Merican "freedom and democracy (tm)"?
So you didn't even read it before criticizing it, did you?
He knows what bullshit tastes like...
He said so.
I heard it's packed with nutrents.
the 2nd photo is clearly photoshopped
so is the economy
Oh really ... https://www.google.com/search?q=+bush+kisses+Abdullah+&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a
Those ones don't have as much tongue
LOL GW, you're like that advertisement where the girl believes her date is a French model because it was on the internet. Being on a blog, You Tube ( even with scary music) or even "real" web sites does not make it true Jeez
I was grossed out when I saw the photo a while ago so I asked my Lebanese in law if it was a custom in those regions for men to kiss on the lips. The answer is yes, but it still looks gay to me.
'..but it still looks gay to me.'
Not at the Bohemian Grove it's not.. ;)
You've got to love the passion Idiot Bush brings to his man kisses.
BTW George, thumb thru the world alternative press and you will find strong assertions that Imam Al Zawahiri sent OBL,s youngest wife to him to expose OBL to the USA. Trade for Egypt?
Actually that picture where the saudi king is holign ding Bush's LEFT hand? That was a HUGE sign of respect given to President Bush.