NSA Whistleblower: NSA Spying On – and Blackmailing – Top Government Officials and Military Officers

George Washington's picture

NSA Whistleblower: NSA Spying On – and Blackmailing – Top Government Officials and Military Officers

 

NSA whistleblower Russel Tice – a key source in the 2005 New York Times report that blew the lid off the Bush administration’s use of warrantless wiretapping – told Peter B. Collins on Boiling Frog Post News (the website of high-level FBI whistleblower Sibel Edmonds):

Tice: Okay. They went after–and I know this because I had my hands literally on the paperwork for these sort of things–they went after high-ranking military officers; they went after members of Congress, both Senate and the House, especially on the intelligence committees and on the armed services committees and some of the–and judicial. But they went after other ones, too. They went after lawyers and law firms. All kinds of–heaps of lawyers and law firms. They went after judges. One of the judges is now sitting on the Supreme Court that I had his wiretap information in my hand. Two are former FISA court judges. They went after State Department officials. They went after people in the executive service that were part of the White House–their own people. They went after antiwar groups. They went after U.S. international–U.S. companies that that do international business, you know, business around the world. They went after U.S. banking firms and financial firms that do international business. They went after NGOs that–like the Red Cross, people like that that go overseas and do humanitarian work. They went after a few antiwar civil rights groups. So, you know, don’t tell me that there’s no abuse, because I’ve had this stuff in my hand and looked at it. And in some cases, I literally was involved in the technology that was going after this stuff. And you know, when I said to [former MSNBC show host Keith] Olbermann, I said, my particular thing is high tech and you know, what’s going on is the other thing, which is the dragnet. The dragnet is what Mark Klein is talking about, the terrestrial dragnet. Well my specialty is outer space. I deal with satellites, and everything that goes in and out of space. I did my spying via space. So that’s how I found out about this.

 

Interviewer: Now Russ, the targeting of the people that you just mentioned, top military leaders, members of Congress, intelligence community leaders and the–oh, I’m sorry, it was intelligence committees, let me correct that–not intelligence community, and then executive branch appointees. This creates the basis, and the potential for massive blackmail.

 

Tice: Absolutely! And remember we talked about that before, that I was worried that the intelligence community now has sway over what is going on. Now here’s the big one. I haven’t given you any names. This was is summer of 2004. One of the papers that I held in my hand was to wiretap a bunch of numbers associated with, with a 40-something-year-old wannabe senator from Illinois. You wouldn’t happen to know where that guy lives right now, would you? It’s a big white house in Washington, DC. That’s who they went after. And that’s the president of the United States now.

 

Other whistleblowers say the same thing.  When the former head of the NSA’s digital spying program – William Binney – disclosed the fact that the U.S. was spying on everyone in the U.S. and storing the data forever, and that the U.S. was quickly becoming a totalitarian state, the Feds tried to scare him into shutting up:

[Numerous] FBI officers held a gun to Binney’s head as he stepped naked from the shower. He watched with his wife and youngest son as the FBI ransacked their home. Later Binney was separated from the rest of his family, and FBI officials pressured him to implicate one of the other complainants in criminal activity. During the raid, Binney attempted to report to FBI officials the crimes he had witnessed at NSA, in particular the NSA’s violation of the constitutional rights of all Americans. However, the FBI wasn’t interested in these disclosures. Instead, FBI officials seized Binney’s private computer, which to this day has not been returned despite the fact that he has not been charged with a crime.

Other NSA whistleblowers have also been subjected to armed raids and criminal prosecution.

After high-level CIA officer John Kiriakou blew the whistle on illegal CIA torture, the government prosecuted him for espionage.

Even the head of the CIA was targeted with extra-constitutional spying and driven out of office.  Indeed, Binney makes it very clear that the government will use information gained from its all-pervasive spying program to frame anyone it doesn’t like.

(More examples here.)

Retired high-level CIA analyst Ray McGovern – the top CIA briefer to numerous presidents – said this a few weeks ago on a radio program:

Which leads to the question, why would [Obama] do all these things? Why would he be afraid for example, to take the drones away from the CIA? Well, I’ve come to the conclusion that he’s afraid. Number one, he’s afraid of what happened to Martin Luther King Jr. And I know from a good friend who was there when it happened, that at a small dinner with progressive supporters – after these progressive supporters were banging on Obama before the election, “Why don’t you do the things we thought you stood for?” Obama turned sharply and said, “Don’t you remember what happened to Martin Luther King Jr.?” That’s a quote, and that’s a very revealing quote.

McGovern also said:

In a speech on March 21, second-term Obama gave us a big clue regarding his concept of leadership – one that is marked primarily by political risk-avoidance and a penchant for “leading from behind”: “Speaking as a politician, I can promise you this: political leaders will not take risks if the people do not demand that they do. You must create the change that you want to see.”

 

John Kennedy was willing to take huge risks in reaching out to the USSR and ending the war in Vietnam. That willingness to take risks may have gotten him assassinated, as James Douglass argues in his masterful JFK and the Unspeakable.

 

Martin Luther King, Jr., also took great risks and met the same end. There is more than just surmise that this weighs heavily on Barack Obama’s mind. Last year, pressed by progressive donors at a dinner party to act more like the progressive they thought he was, Obama responded sharply, “Don’t you remember what happened to Dr. King?”

We’re agnostic about McGovern’s theory. We don’t know whether Obama is a total corrupt sell-out … or a chicken. We don't think it matters ... as the effect is the same.

Head of Mainstream News Group: “The Government May Love This [Destruction of the Free Press]. I Suspect That They Do. But Beware The Government That Loves Secrecy Too Much”

The CEO of the Associated Press said yesterday that the government is dramatically interfering with the newsgathering ability of the press:

What I learned from our journalists should alarm everyone in this room and I think should alarm everyone in this country. The actions of the DOJ against AP [the Department of Justice bugging AP's phones] are already having an impact beyond the specifics of this particular case.

 

***

 

Some of our longtime trusted sources have become nervous and anxious about talking to us, even about stories that aren’t about national security. In some cases, government employees that we once checked in with regularly will no longer speak to us by phone, and some are reluctant to meet in person.

 

***

 

I can tell you that this chilling effect is not just at AP, it’s happening at other news organizations as well. Journalists from other news organizations have personally told me it has intimidated sources from speaking to them.

 

***

 

The government may love this. I suspect that they do. But beware the government that loves secrecy too much.

Indeed, the Attorney General of the United States isn’t sure how often reporters’ records are seized.

Further, the Department of Justice is prosecuting a whistleblower regarding North Korea … as well as the chief Washington correspondent for Fox News who reported on what the whistleblower told him. As the Washington Post notes:

[Department of Justice investigators] used security badge access records to track the reporter’s comings and goings from the State Department, according to a newly obtained court affidavit. They traced the timing of his calls with a State Department security adviser suspected of sharing the classified report. They obtained a search warrant for the reporter’s personal e-mails.

Moreover, a CBS News reporter’s computer was spied upon while she was working on stories about government hijinks (more).

And ABC News’ reports that an armed minder trailed reporters … preventing them from being able to talk to whistleblowers:

As we traveled the public hallways of the building – watched over by security cameras – an armed uniformed police officer with the Federal Protective Service followed us. We were looking for a particular office—of someone who would not want to be seen talking to reporters–but chose to bypass it because of our official babysitter.

 

Asked why we were being escorted in a public building, the officer identified himself as Insp. Mike Finkelstein and said he was only trying to make sure that the newsmen were not a “nuisance.” He brushed aside further questions. The cop said a supervisor would call to explain.

 

One of the reporters wanted to know if the act of following the journalists was an effort intended to scare off any federal employee who might have considered speaking to the press. That’s sure what it looked like; and, even if that wasn’t the goal, it was the effect.

 

As of Friday night, no supervisor had called back.

 

After ABC News phoned and e-mailed the spokespeople in Washington repeatedly for more than 24 hours, a low-level staffer with Homeland Security finally responded. “After review by a supervisor, it was determined that the inspector acted according to proper security procedures and that no improper conduct occurred,” the spokesman said.

There have been many similar scandals over the last couple of years. For example:

  • The Bush White House worked hard to smear CIA officers, bloggers and anyone else who criticized the Iraq war
  • After Pulitzer Prize winning journalist Chris Hedges, journalist Naomi Wolf, Pentagon Papers whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg and others sued the government to enjoin the NDAA’s allowance of the indefinite detention of Americans – the judge asked the government attorneys 5 times whether journalists like Hedges could be indefinitely detained simply for interviewing and then writing about bad guys. The government refused to promise that journalists like Hedges won’t be thrown in a dungeon for the rest of their lives without any right to talk to a judge

In an effort to protect Bank of America from the threatened Wikileaks expose of the bank’s wrongdoing, the Department of Justice told Bank of America to a hire a specific hardball-playing law firm to assemble a team to take down WikiLeaks (and see this).

Wikileaks’ head Julian Assange could face the death penalty for his heinous crime of leaking whistleblower information which make those in power uncomfortable … i.e. being a reporter.

But – whatever you think of Wikileaks – that was the canary in the coal mine in terms of going after reporters. Specifically, former attorney general Mukasey said the U.S. should prosecute Assange because it’s “easier” than prosecuting the New York Times.

Subsequently, Congress considered a bill which would make even mainstream reporters liable for publishing leaked information.

Journalist and former constitutional lawyer Glenn Greenwald notes:

The Washington Post’s Karen Tumulty [says that "The alternative to 'conspiring' with leakers to get information: Just writing what the government tells you."]

That, of course, is precisely the point of the unprecedented Obama war on whistleblowers and press freedoms: to ensure that the only information the public can get is information that the Obama administration wants it to have. That’s why Obama’s one-side games with secrecy – we’ll prolifically leak when it glorifies the president and severely punish all other kinds – is designed to construct the classic propaganda model. And it’s good to see journalists finally speaking out in genuine outrage and concern about all of this.

***

Here’s an amazing and revealing fact: after Richard Nixon lost the right to exercise prior restraint over the New York Times’ publication of the Pentagon Papers, he was desperate to punish and prosecute the responsible NYT reporter, Neil Sheehan. Thus, recounted the NYT’s lawyer at the time, James Goodale, Nixon concocted a theory:

“Nixon convened a grand jury to indict the New York Times and its reporter, Neil Sheehan, for conspiracy to commit espionage . . . .The government’s ‘conspiracy’ theory centered around how Sheehan got the Pentagon Papers in the first place. While Daniel Ellsberg had his own copy stored in his apartment in Cambridge, the government believed Ellsberg had given part of the papers to anti-war activists. It apparently theorized further that the activists had talked to Sheehan about publication in the Times, all of which it believed amounted to a conspiracy to violate the Espionage Act.”

As Goodale notes, this is exactly “the same charge Obama’s Justice Department is investigating Assange under today,” and it’s now exactly the same theory used to formally brand Fox’s James Rosen as a criminal in court.

Indeed, this is not a partisan issue. Bush was worse than Nixon on unlawful spying and harassment of reporters … but so is Obama.

Whistleblower Witch Hunt

But Obama has gone after whistleblowers more viciously than Bush, Nixon, or any president in history. Indeed, the Obama administration has prosecuted more whistleblowers than all other presidents combined.

And the government goes out of its way to smear whistleblowers and harass honest analysts.

Even high-level government employees are in danger. For example, after the former head of the NSA’s digital spying program – William Binney – disclosed the fact that the U.S. was spying on everyone in the U.S. and storing the data forever, and that the U.S. was quickly becoming a totalitarian state, the Feds tried to scare him into shutting up:

[Numerous] FBI officers held a gun to Binney’s head as he stepped naked from the shower. He watched with his wife and youngest son as the FBI ransacked their home. Later Binney was separated from the rest of his family, and FBI officials pressured him to implicate one of the other complainants in criminal activity. During the raid, Binney attempted to report to FBI officials the crimes he had witnessed at NSA, in particular the NSA’s violation of the constitutional rights of all Americans. However, the FBI wasn’t interested in these disclosures. Instead, FBI officials seized Binney’s private computer, which to this day has not been returned despite the fact that he has not been charged with a crime.

Other NSA whistleblowers have also been subjected to armed raids and criminal prosecution.

After high-level CIA officer John Kiriakou blew the whistle on illegal CIA torture, the government prosecuted him for espionage.

Even the head of the CIA was targeted with extra-constitutional spying and driven out of office.  Indeed, the government will use information gained from its all-pervasive spying program to frame anyone it doesn’t like.

The mainstream media is finally awakening to the fact we are flirting with tyranny … and is finally starting to push back.

The best defense is a strong offense, and it is use it or lose it time for the Constitution and Bill of Rights.

The press should shake of its sleepiness and start talking to the whistleblowers it’s been ignoring for years … to find out what the government is working so hard to hide.

Bot statistics for this page

 

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Atticus Finch's picture

A viper has been let out of the bag.

blindman's picture

Beth Hart & Jeff Beck - I'd Rather Go Blind (Kennedy Center Honors 2012)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fALdOkf_eCM&feature=endscreen&NR=1

Kina's picture

No wonder the banksters feel totally free to corrupt each and every market...who is going to hold them to justice?

Kina's picture

The NSA have the President of the USA too scared to do anything??

So who is really behind the NSA, who are the bosses, the behind the scenes rulers of the NSA...thus the USA?

supermaxedout's picture

Its the modern US Nazis and the Zionists = Nazionists

q99x2's picture

Eric Holder is an admitted criminal so what do you expect. Washington and Wall Street are attacking and terrorising the United States of America. Duh.

Obama or someone had all the NAVY seals killed that worked on the Bin Laden hoax. You can't make that shit up. They are all dead by the US not no Al-Quada. They accidentally all fuckin died. Can you believe it?

spanish inquisition's picture

So step one is to get a list together of who "they" are that tell the NSA who to gather intel on.. I am guessing it isn't the head of the NSA.

shovelhead's picture

I wonder if the loudest cries of "traitor" about Snowden's revelations are from Congresscritters with the biggest files that contain some rather unsavory photos of teen interns and insider trading information.

Mr. Hoover would be proud.

lakecity55's picture

Soon, everyone will work for the nsa.

 

Snowden is being attacked by all the guys he has 'compromising' info on.

Maybe he can put out a baseball card series.

Ser 1, #110: feinstein eating fetuses at an abortion clinic.'

Ser 1. # 12: Lindsay and the Boyz.

Ser 2. # 45: Barry and Reggie.

Or, the AIPAC collection:

#23: Congressman Smithers collects from AIPAC

#27: Senator Jones collects from AIPAC

Collect them all.

kchrisc's picture

One thing I know for sure: Obama is the CIA's bitch. The CIA and their offshoots are running things.

My speculation:

At the risk of seeming to say the moon is made of cheese, I think a lot of these "leaks" of the past month or so are really the power centered on the Pentagon trying to take the CIA down a notch or two. Also payback for the take down of Petreuas and several other Generals and the attacks on the Pentagon's bitch, Hillary.

Snowden is just too polished and prepared to be creditable to me. I am not saying his info is not real, but that he and his actual motivation may not be what they appear. And the "chain" article publishing right after each new lie seems to coordinated just a bit too well.

If I, and others, are correct, we can expect some more high-profile take downs of Generals, "leaks" on some Pentagon programs and more mysterious deaths, etc. as return fire against the Pentagon.

Basically, we seem to be the in the middle of a "mob" war between the CIA and Pentagon powers.

What say others?

Now, I'm going out to the garage to check the motor-mounts on my car. Don't want the engine to take off down the street and hurt someone if I rear-end someone. ;-)

 

StarTedStackin''s picture

GW has come a long way since prefacing every article " Bush did it too"....

 

 

 

Those who cannot see a difference are fools and or liars.....Bush had principles(and got a raw deal from the Socialist press) compared to the Obowel Movement

MeelionDollerBogus's picture

Bush Sr was CIA. Bush Jr did what Dick Cheney & President Daddy told him to do. There was no socialism whatsoever so no socialist influence. Obama has THE SAME masters. NOTHING has changed.

Bringin It's picture

Note to TD - Bring back CAPTCHA.

StarTedStackin''s picture

Obama is "exactly the same" as all other Presidents......the Libertarian right claims it so......

MeelionDollerBogus's picture

there is no right or left.
The entire illusion is a farce.
Buying into the illusion is an instant IQ-test fail.

ThisIsBob's picture

And yet the only people who seem willing to stand up against this government shit are the tea party nutters.  Go figure.

nickt1y's picture

And your point is .....?

StarTedStackin''s picture

nutters?

 

 

I'd wager you'd like some "nutter butter"

Tsar Pointless's picture

Not necessarily. I was part of a massive group of people over a decade ago who protested the illegal invasion of Iraq in 2003. Also, there was that little crowd called the "Occupy Wall Street" faction that did what it could to stand up to the US government.

The funny thing is, I'll bet with absolute certainty, that those who identify with the so-called and ill-named "Tea Party" movement would have been against me in 2003. "Freedom isn't free!" and "America: Love it or leave it!" and all that jazz.

With 100% percent certainty I make that statement. With a side of freedom fries to boot.

MeelionDollerBogus's picture

can I have mine as freedom poutine? with some GMO bacon made from man-bear-pigs?

StarTedStackin''s picture

What HASN'T the Obowel Movement lied about. coward?

Tsar Pointless's picture

Me? A coward? Quite brave for someone on the Internet to call somebody a name.

Bringin It's picture

Relax - no one's talking up Ofakeout the CIA-raised Manchurian candidate.

Hegel would be proud.

Yellowhoard's picture

Would be interesting to know exactly how Chief Justice Roberts was compromised.

We are so fucked.

ISEEIT's picture

Easiest to do in most cases with a married male is 'Petraeus style'. Many other options available though. This crap has been going on for a very long time. The difference today of course being that even the pretense of restraint is gone.

Tom in AZ's picture

Being the original Manchurian candidate of the right, once they started digging it would be an avalanche. Like someone isn't following all the secret handshakes of that bunch of self-entitled lunaatics at the Federalist Society....

 

Axenolith's picture

The use of this information for the purposes of manipulation of governments and courts, and for general blackmail, is totally treason.  If the death penalty is to be utilized for anyone, it should be for anyone convicted of doing this shit...

Tom in AZ's picture

I believe that is exactly why they are so ruthless when threatened. Treason. Quaint idea, but once let out into the light of day, people REALLY don't like the real thing. Unlike the trumped up crap the gov't trots out - along with the by now ubiquitous child porn 'found' on the suspects hard drive....

 

MeelionDollerBogus's picture

and yet with Valerie Plame next to NO one freaked out calling for charges of Treason. Some did but less than 1 in 100,000, probably only 200 in the entire United States even thought of it.

Duc888's picture

Gee, pretty soon this might cause some problems.  Oh wait, I got it figured out.  Keep voting, hahahahahaaha

 

Me?    I'm goin' fresh water fishingfor the next 20 or so years.

cherry picker's picture

George, I gotta give you credit.  There were one or two posts I have read this year you published I couldn't agree with, but this kind of stuff, backed by reference material, is what .gov considers whistle blower stuff, even though it is already known.

Many would call you a malcontent, traitor or just seeking your five minutes of fame, but not I.

I hope you are able to continue and don't vanish along with some others who tried to inform.

Bringin It's picture

o Many would call you a malcontent, traitor or just seeking your five minutes of fame, but not I.

That's kind of a weird compliment,

Malcontent sure.  Who isn't at this stage is not paying attention.

But traitor?? Anyone calling GW a traitor has to be working hand in glove with the dual-passport-gang.

It's like hearing you've been excommunicated by one of the Borges.

NickVegas's picture

This is insane. How is this even possible?

Is there a way to declare a government illegal, abdicated, dissolved, by the people. The mechanism is a little unclear. It would appear that tyrany has arrived. Reichstag fire anyone.

"Qui Bono Sonny Bono", said Bobo, the clown drooled, stupefied, lobotomized.

kchrisc's picture

"Is there a way to declare a government illegal, abdicated, dissolved, by the people."

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

beaglebog's picture

Yes.

 

You need an Affidavit, signed by millions ... stating that you Do Not Consent to their Governance.

 

Kinda like a Declaration of Independence; only nowadays there wouldn't be a mere 56 signatories.

 

Of course, you'd be ignored, unless you have the physical force to press your case.

involuntarilybirthed's picture

They are hiding incompetence and greatly fear its discovery.

calltoaccount's picture

it's not just incompetence.  it's the military industrial bankster corporate predator ptb at it's best/worst. Remember the NSA farms out it's work and hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars to private, for profit by any means? Carlyle (Booze Allen) and other intl corporate behemoths that only care about profits.  

incompetence is the cover story. 

Jim in MN's picture

Now that several explosive conspiracy theories have proven to be facts, just the tip of the iceberg really, all journalistic orgs and individuals must be wondering what to do....other than look for another line of work that is....

Bringin It's picture

Work remotely like the TDs.

aerojet's picture

Yeah, we need to stop this before it grows out of hand.  Out of hand would be your friends and neighbors becoming "disappaered".

Buck Johnson's picture

I know, we have made a monster that we can't control anymore and where foolish to think we could in the first place.  Also I think it's already to late, and we will see people being "disappaered".

One of these is not like the others..'s picture

Out of hand would be your friends and neighbours and pretty much everyone who particpates on this forum becoming "disappeared".

There. Fixed it.

bank guy in Brussels's picture

GW's article actually rather proves it is too late to 'stop this', especially in light of the extortion of Congressman Conyers on the House Judiciary Committee, who is actually, under the US Constitution, the key person for any 'legal' non-coup-d'état restoration of US human rights and US Constitutional government.

GW is essentially confirming that in the USA, democracy, or Constitutional government of a republic, has been crushed beyond hope of any 'legal' method of repair.

GW's quoted testimony from Russell Tice above, dovetails perfectly with the Conyers extortion story, relayed by people around Conyers at the risk of their lives.

---

Under the US Constitution, the US Congress is supreme - not the US Supreme Court ! - with the US Congress having totally unlimited power to:
- Impeach and remove any US President for 'misdemeanors', and
- Impeach and remove, any and all US Federal judges, and any and all US Supreme Court Justices including the Chief Justice, merely for lack of 'good behaviour' ... such as not honouring the Constitution.

Impeachment is via trial by Senate, after accusation by House, starting in the House Judiciary Committee. Which makes the House Judiciary Committee Chairman, the key and central Constitutional officer in the USA.

But exactly as Obama began moving into the White House in 2008-2009, House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers was threatened with murder, like Judiciary Committee Congressman Sonny Bono had been murdered in 1998 ... and they prosecuted and jailed Conyers' wife to underscore the threats.

Black man from Detroit Conyers had been naive, he had bought into the Obama hype, and he thought that with Obama's inauguration, he could move against the bribed, racist and corrupt federal judges who had jailed all those innocent black people. Conyers had massive files proving the innocence of so many people in prison, and so much evidence of corruption among US Federal Judges in every section of the country.

So with Obama's co-operation, they threatened to murder John Conyers, reminding him of how they murdered US Judiciary Committee Congressman Sonny Bono in the 1990s ... and they jailed Conyers' wife under politically-motivated charges just to drive the point home. 'Make a move against the bribed judges, and you die. You will never live to hold those hearings,' they said.

John Conyers agreed to stay silent just to stay alive ... if Conyers tried to be a hero, media would smear him and Google Inc. would just spread lies about why and how Conyers died, with nothing accomplished for the Constitution.

And then they shot dead US Federal Judge John Roll in 2011 after he ruled against Obama ... barely covered by US media, but a good warning to all other US judges. Play ball with the Bribed Ones, or die.

That is America.

---

The Conyers extortion is quite illuminated and evidenced by that great quote there right at the top of GW's article ... showing that they have blackmail-control over every branch of government, every key person in the apparatus who might have been a potential source of redress of human rights in America

Russell Tice above: « They went after high-ranking military officers; they went after members of Congress, both Senate and the House, especially on the intelligence committees and on the armed services committees and some of the–and judicial. But they went after other ones, too. They went after lawyers and law firms. All kinds of–heaps of lawyers and law firms. They went after judges. One of the judges is now sitting on the Supreme Court that I had his wiretap information in my hand. Two are former FISA court judges. They went after State Department officials. They went after people in the executive service that were part of the White House–their own people. »

involuntarilybirthed's picture

2/3 of the States can change the constitution anytime they want without the approval of Washington.  They are Supreme Supreme if they want.  But it is not  followed anyway so forget about it.  Where was I?

Trampy's picture

dream on. ALEC would never go for that ...

George Washington's picture

"the Conyers extortion story, relayed by people around Conyers at the risk of their lives."

Link, please...