Why I Love PRISM
Originally posted at: capitalistexploits.at
If you drink poisoned water thinking it's safe you're a victim. If you drink poisoned water knowing it's poisoned you're an idiot.
In that context, I have been a complete idiot.
- I've stored unencrypted financial information on companies which I've been researching on Dropbox
- I've used Gmail
- I've used Skype
- I've used Google for search
- I've surfed the Net without a VPN
It's all true, and I'm ashamed not because I've used this stuff, but because I knew it was unsafe and I used it anyway!
I'm ignorant about many things my fellow bipeds don't seem to be...the Kardashians bowel movements, the debate raging over the name of the latest royal sprog, Lindsay Lohan's rehab schedule...amongst many other things.
On the topic of data security however, I actually should have known better. You see, this is a trend only a blind man could miss. The need for data security in the world of the ever-expanding Surveillance State, which Mark alluded to in his post I've Got Nothing To Hide, has led me to searching for companies providing privacy solutions.
My initial concern was mistakenly hackers. In my minds eye I envisioned geeky, pimple faced, energy-drink-laden, pizza guzzling 20-somethings who haven't seen sunlight in months, hunched over their laptops, working away feverishly in grandma's gloomy basement.
Their prize in my case would have been gaining access to business plans - likely never understood - financial statements which would have bored them to tears, stack decks and term sheets with enough legalese to put an elephant to sleep.
Pimply-faced teenage hackers may well pose a threat to our data security, but governments are the undeniable leader of the "hacking" pack.
When looking for investment themes which encompass massive trends in motion, the protection of data all of a sudden became very interesting to Mark and I. How could we as capitalists participate in this sector?
“Oh Chris, you must have known the government are capturing this stuff not hackers...surely you knew that?”
I knew those psychopaths were out there, and rest assured they absolutely are psychopaths. In truth I never realised the extent of it, in fact I'm sure I still don't. Nobody does...most likely including Mr. Snowden, who seems to know a thing or two about this stuff.
My only consolation and the only defense I can offer for my stupidity is that I have always refused to have a Facebook page. Updating "friends" on my status, "Going to the bathroom now, and heading to Jo-Jo's for a long black after..." strangely, failed to appeal. Weird, I know.
Nor, thankfully have I ever put my or any of my families photos or personal information anywhere except encrypted hard drives held in my physical possession.
In addition, I have steadfastly refused to buy a smartphone. Want a personal tracking device masquerading as a phone? Nah, I'll pass thanks!
Still, even though I knew Leviathan was on the loose, why wasn't I more careful?
Simplicity and ease of use. Yep, I took the easy route. I deserve to have my ass kicked for it really, but it's the same human nature that has caused “free” cloud-based services to multiply like kudzu. Humans, a category I count myself in though some might disagree, are lazy.
Laziness, ignorance and a love for anything "free" is the carrot that has drawn so many of us into using these products. This won't change any time soon. Try convincing Aunt Emma and Uncle Jonathan to use PGP and watch for the blank stares. No indeed, change takes place with those who are intellectually curious, active and informed. For the vast majority change will just not happen. Pareto was right.
This article is dedicated to the former rather than the latter.
The Slippery Slope
Where laws do exist to protect data and privacy, governments are subverting these laws anyway. Laws, after all only apply to the hoi polloi.
The data we hold and transmit is an open book. This is the reality of the world we find ourselves in. Some knew it existed, many others are still finding it hard to believe it's as bad as it is. Then some others, complete fools to be sure, see no reason to be concerned about this reality. "If you have nothing to hide, then you needn't worry."
If you're in that crowd I suggest reading some history - quickly - to better educate yourself.
Companies such as Microsoft, Google, Dropbox, and Amazon to name but a few, have marketed the idea that customer data is secure with them.
Numerous cases of hacking make these assurances laughable. Now of course we have learned that these same companies have been cooperating directly with governments around the world. Providing "back doors" into their "secure" networks and storage. So much for "Your privacy is our priority". What an insult!
Government, being not much more than a Mafia with a limitless checkbook, are out of control and on the loose. The track record which accompanies previous Surveillance States is horrifying in its historical record of persecution, genocide and atrocities.
This is fact not opinion.
That said, fighting an enormous out-of-control government via the electoral system, or campaigning your elected "representatives" is asinine at best. Protesting and marching, even talking in the wrong crowd will increasingly get you on a "person of interest" list. None of these options particularly appeal unless you're a fan of windowless rooms and black bags.
According to a number of sources, including this from the Guardian, the NSA revelations are finally directly affecting the profits of US-based companies in this space...in a negative way. Good!
This is a natural and perfect example of the market solving problems. What is clear is that providing the technology to keep communications and data secure and private is no longer a simple “nice to have”, but both increasingly essential and increasingly in demand. This ensures those providing solutions will likely be very profitable.
What, therefore can we do about it?
Profit of course!
Late last year Mark and I, together with our CPAN members, invested in a privately held company providing a solution to insecure cloud storage options. Little did we know the gift Obama's administration was about to bestow on them.
Given the current Surveillance State we find ourselves in I thought it timely to reach out to Nathan Brumby, the CEO of Lockbox, to provide a far more eloquent explanation of their technology than I could muster up.
As a background, the Company was founded by a small group of highly talented entrepreneurs who first built bouncycastle.org, an open source cryptography platform now used by multinationals around the world. They then turned their attention to developing what is possibly the strongest and pre-eminent client-side encrypted cloud storage technology out there.
Chris: Nathan, can you give me the quick and dirty download on what Lockbox actually is and does?
Nathan: Lockbox quite simply is a locks and keys company. It empowers the owner of any content, via client side encryption to encrypt (locks), select and allow (keys) for who they share content with. There is no middle man.
Chris: For sake of comparison can you explain how Lockbox differs to say Dropbox, and in fact that of your other competition in the encrypted space?
Nathan: It is well understood that companies like Dropbox and Box, etc have built very successful businesses on the basis of allowing sharing of files in a very elegant manner. There are also numerous examples of very strong and robust server side encryption companies that can lock down an environment and ensure security and privacy. For years the assumed wisdom has been that you can be very good at sharing or very good at encryption and privacy but not both simultaneously.
Lockbox has been able to solve this incredibly complex challenge. With Lockbox you can share, but more importantly you can share in a secure and private manner. This is a very significant paradigm shift.
Chris: Can you explain to me what would happen if a government, or in fact anyone, wanted to obtain access to user files...would they be able to?
Nathan: Specifically because Lockbox enables a locks and keys relationship between an owner on the client side and who they choose to share with, no one but that owner and and their trusted relationships has access to the locks and keys. This is truly decentralized key management.
Anybody outside that trusted relationship including Lockbox itself has no access and would be required to go directly to the parties involved to seek access. This is fundamentally different to how things work today and in what is evidenced with PRISM. In those scenarios owners were not required, as centralized locks and keys simply meant the interested party simply had to go to the provider.
Chris: How can I as a user trust Lockbox...or, don't I need to trust them?
Nathan: Simply because the Lockbox solution is decentralized and the control is with the client, Lockbox does not need to be trusted. Secondly, and more illustratively, because Lockbox has no access to anyone’s content it does not require the complex and all powerful Terms and Conditions that the majority of companies use today, which completely takes ownership and removes the concept of privacy.
Chris: Cyber theft in Bitcoins is one of many examples of insufficient security practices. How can people learn which companies operating in the cloud are secure, and which simply say they are secure but could be lying?
Nathan: This is incredibly challenging for a consumer, as the marketing hype and misdirection is rampant. The most simple way would be to review the Terms and Conditions. If they in any way suggest they can access or use your data, and or state all care and no liability, this is a pretty good sign they are not particularly secure or private and really should be avoided.
Chris: From your experience in the industry, what is the most common concern people have when using the Cloud, and do they follow through to ensure that this concern is addressed?
Nathan: The consistent concerns have been security, availability and sovereignty of data. However since the economic collapse of late 2008 people have tended to not always observe these concerns and it really is only just recently that the concerns, and the realities of those concerns, have become more overt.
Chris: Thanks Nathan
Nathan: My pleasure Chris.
There you have it. One option for those serious about protecting sensitive data.
As I was putting the finishing touches to this post I came across the recent news that Lavabit, an email encryption firm allegedly used by Ed Snowden has abruptly shut down all operations.
"I have been forced to make a difficult decision: to become complicit in crimes against the American people, or walk away from nearly 10 years of hard work by shutting down Lavabit."
"This experience has taught me one very important lesson: without congressional action or a strong judicial precedent, I would strongly recommend against anyone trusting their private data to a company with physical ties to the United States."
You can read the full statement on the companies website here.
The Obama administration is actively destroying trust amongst consumers, and as Dylan Grice so eloquently points out:
"Distrust is a brake on prosperity, because distrust is a brake on exchange."
Putting a brake on exchange puts a break on the economy and increases social stresses leading to domestic and/or external conflict. This is where these psychopaths are leading us...economic ruin, servitude or both!
Silent circle, a company I've been in discussions with regarding their products, and who I just recently decided not to engage due to their being headquartered in "Washington DC"...ummm, have terminated Silent Mail, which WAS their encrypted mail product.
According to Jon Callas, co-founder:
"We see the writing the wall, and we have decided that it is best for us to shut down Silent Mail now."
"We have not received subpoenas, warrants, security letters, or anything else by any government, and this is why we are acting now."
Government is quickly closing ranks and stripping its citizens of all protections. Yet, here is why I thank Obama!:
"I will also hold myself as president to a new standard of openness .... Let me say it as simply as I can: Transparency and the rule of law will be the touchstones of this presidency."
"Thank him?" Yes. In short because he is easily the most transparent liar in American history. His breaking of every imaginable law and trampling of the US Constitution is unprecedented. Yet, as hard as it might be to imagine, this too will create opportunity.
There is a saying in financial circles..."Don't fight the tape". Well Folks, I'm not fighting the tape on this one. As a capitalist, sadly something that has become a dirty word in our politically-driven world, I choose to take my stand by investing in and supporting solutions to problems. This is a BIG problem.
Disclosure: Not that it really should be anyone's business, but in the interests of transparency - NO, not the sort Obama promises - Mark and I, together with our CPAN members participated in an early stage equity raise in Lockbox. Since the Company is still private and the equity round closed, readers cannot invest in Lockbox at this time. Regardless, this is not a recommendation to do any such thing.
Furthermore, I'd like to thank the NSA, the FBI, Google, Microsoft, Verizon and the many, many spineless companies and bureaucrats who have assisted Lockbox and companies like them in achieving accelerating demand for their product and helping us get richer...because after all, that's how we capitalists roll.
"it is astounding that so many consumers put private information in the hands of a ‘free’ service that essentially shares that data with the provider. That free service brings a lack of security, privacy and control where a provider has access to any and all data that is uploaded and that data can be used for whatever the provider deems fit." - Peter Long, Co-founder Lockbox
- advertisements -