This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
Media Forgets: Rouhani’s Spots Won’t Change
Turning over new leaves and all that stuff is great if you believe that your true nature can be changed. But, leopards rarely change their spots and Iranian spots are just as indelible as any others in the world. Rouhani is being hailed as the new pacifist, the guy we have to chat on the phone to about the traffic in New York. The most wanted man (in a good way) as Presidents clamber to get in on the act to chat and to be seen (that’s the most important thing) having a talk over the role of nuclear power in Iran and Iran’s new-found world, lying at its feet. But, the media of the world has a short memory or none at all. Rouhani is not so much the mild mannered guy of today as one of the active participants in the anti-Semitic bomb attack that took place in Buenos Aires in 1984, killing 85 people.
Why Not Trust Rouhani and Iran?
Hassan Rouhani is a wonderful marketing guru, the guy that will be a role-model for spin-doctors in years to come. The world has gobbled up the few words that he has pronounced as if Iran is the next manna from heaven. Why exactly? Especially sinceRouhani is a man to make even Attila the Hun wary and shy away.
- Rouhani has never stated ever that Iran will discuss the halting of uranium enrichment.
- Rouhani is vastly more intelligent than the slap-in-the-face Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. The latter’s brashness and angry vociferations made him an easy target for the international press. The diplomatic spheres held him at a distance, punishing him for his uncontrollable emotions. Rouhani is much more perspicacious. He is the image of the mild-mannered wise old man. But, that doesn’t make him any less radical. He is certainly no less Islamic. He is still an Islamic radical and always will be. He’s just better at marketing himself.
- Almost the entire Sunnite Muslim world hates Iran and wishes to bring it down. How else could the powers-that-be in Iran imagine their future except one that is protected by nuclear weapons?
- It will be the only answer possible to protect the Iranians against the arch rival and enemy of Israel.
- Nuclear weapons will be the only way to protect Iran from the infidels of Uncle Sam. The US administration might be stating that it has no intention of bringing down your regime, but who can believe anything the US President says these days?
- After all, why did the Iranian government decide to defend so openly and quickly the Syrian regime of Bachar-al-Assad? Simply because it knew that the US wouldn’t take the risk of attacking al-Assad. Now Rouhani has gained the unfailing defense of the Syrian leader for being one of the only few to have stood up and defended him in the face of the West.
- Nuclear weapons and nuclear power will only make the world sit up and listen to Iran. It will gain a place in the Middle East that will mean increased prosperity and economic wealth. We only ever listen to people that have voices. People only gain voices when they get military might to be reckoned with.
- Ali Khamenei the Supreme leader of Iran stated that nuclear weapons were anti-Islamic, but you don’t have to use them to show the world that you have them and that you might just do so. The West would never use nuclear weapons either. The five permanent members of the Security Council at the United Nations Organization know only too well that they have supreme power because they have nuclear weapons added to the right to veto. It doesn’t mean that any of them would actually use it. This is not the 1970s with nuclear-bomb touting threats being branded about. Iran would be out of its mind to not want the same power in the Middle East.
- Giving up on nuclear weapons would mean that the West had won over Iran. That’s impossible to imagine after decades of mutual hate and building political lives out of that relationship that doesn’t exist.
How wonderful for a fifteen-minute conversation to wipe away the years of distance. How wonderful to believe and to be so naïve that the media reports on anecdotal stories of saying goodbye in each other’s languages. A generation or two of Iranians and Americans must be turning in their graves at such a collective show of bonhomie. Crippling economic sanctions for years have meant that the country is nothing more than a sorry old state of poverty-stricken people. That might just change if Rouhani pulls it off. He’s playing the West at its own game. He’s vaudeville supreme, an Iranian diva that will have Obama laughing at his jokes in no time at all. But, the custard will be on Obama’s face and the Western media’s.
Iran is a sorry state and will remain it unless it manages to get the West on its side. Leopards never change their spots though. It will certainly be ready to do whatever it can to get the country out of the turmoil and economic despair it has been in for decades now:
- Inflation has sometimes reached 30%. It is currently at over 23.6% today.
- The Iranian currency (IRR) lost almost 70% of its value at its worst.
- In 2005, when Ahmadinejad took power, the exchange rate was 9, 000 Iranian Rials to the Dollar.
- In 2012 it was over 12, 200 Rials to the Dollar.
- Unemployment currently stands at 15.5% (2012) in a country which has a population of 75 million people (last census taken in 2011).
- It has a GDP of $483 billion.
- GDP is predicted to increase to $598 billion (2014) and $676 billion (2015).
- Between now and 2016 it is estimated that it will rocket by $308 billion in total and reach $779 billion.
- Health expenditure represents roughly 3.9% of GDP (since 2009).
- Education is roughly 4.7% of GDP (since 2009).
- It has a labor force of 27 million people and 25% of them work in agriculture.
- Approximately 20% of the population lives below the poverty line.
But, there are those reasons that why Rouhani shouldn’t be trusted that are staring us all in the face and that the media is missing completely. These are the facts as to why Iran should be kept at a distance. But, it won’t be. Rouhani is already in line for chit-chat about how dreadful it is that the New York traffic was slowing his speedy flight to the airport. It’s no wonder that Rouhani mentioned it on his Twitter account. Does President Obama have one the time to chat aimlessly about traffic and whatever else passes through his mind on an average day and secondly does he call everyone to apologize that we are being held up and stuck in traffic every single day? It’s doubtful.
Iran through Rouhani will gain access in his own right to nuclear weapons and to nuclear power by the back door or the front door. That will be with or without the Americans and the Western world. There is no other way for the country to get back on its feet. While it’s on its way to military protection it will pull the wool over the eyes of the western world and Iran will become a valuable ally of the West. The hate relationship will become a love-hate one until the West and Iran are intertwined and locked into a trade relationship that will mean getting on with each other.
The only trouble is: the supreme west (!), the ones with the eavesdropping informants at the NSA will not see any of this coming and they will be oblivious even when it slaps them in their faces.
Originally posted: Media Forgets: Rouhani’s Spots Won’t Change
You might also enjoy:
Sugar Rush is on | Human Capital: Switzerland or Yemen? | Wonderful President of USA and Munchkins | Last One to Leave Turn Out the Lights | Crisis is Literal Kiss of Death | Qatar’s Slave Trade Death Toll | Lew’s Illusions | Wal-Mart: Unpatriotic or Lying Through Their Teeth? | Food: Walking the Breadline | Obama NOT Worst President in reply to Obama: Worst President in US History? | Obama's Corporate Grand Bargain Death of the Dollar | Joseph Stiglitz was Right: Suicide | China Injects Cash in Bid to Improve Liquidity
Technical Analysis: Bear Expanding Triangle | Bull Expanding Triangle | Bull Falling Wedge | Bear Rising Wedge | High & Tight Flag
»
- advertisements -
2.4 Bn. hollowpoint cal .40 bullets , and still stacking. DHS will make a peace on earth ....
Indeed, and I think the last time Iran invaded another country, it was 1798.
Oh the evil not to be trusted Iranian boogeymen...
Whose spin doctor are you?
At least sPivot see's "Spots" on this Country - how many of the Playa's seem not to have any blemish's at all?
Any sign of bias in this entry?
This was the dumbest article I've seen on the subject for some time.
PivotFarm writes as if he's a 12 year old... a backward 12 year old, at that.
Leopards don't change their spots... lulz
A just so story.
So why is having an economic relationship with Iran inherently bad? And why do we care if the NSA "sees it coming"? I am not sure of the point of this article, it makes no internal sense and its conclusion is completely unsupported, presented in a false light, and almost a complete non-sequiter.
Zionists never change their spots.
F*** Israelite hate speech ... and their hateful hijacking of US foreign policy.
Pivot farm... nice hasbara propaganda. why sell your soul for them? not worth it.
Speaking of history, it is often forgotten that the first attempt at a nuke program in Iran was made by the Shah who at the time was a client of the US. Funnyily enough, when the Shah was overthrown, Khomenie got rid of the nuke program in the same way he got rid of many of the Shah's other efforts that placed Iran close to the USA. Many of the best nuke scientists left Iran in fear.
A few years later, having thought about it, Khomenie reversed course and invited the nuke scientists back, telling them it was their duty to build an Islamic bomb.
Sooooo, Iran having a nuke (or not) is not an absolute position. It just depends on who we like or dislike on any given day.....
the propaganda machine is turned back up over 11 this morning. As i was driving around today, i heard two propaganda interviews... the first from some close with the WSJ claiming that the Syrian government (the "regime" or "assad's regime" always) is starving civilians as a tactic now... hysterical. followed a few minutes later with twenty minutes of netanhayu lying non-stop about why peace talks are a bad idea... total psychopath... AIPAC must be outlawed immediatly, and Isreal should have its nukes and chemical weapons removed, and, as helen thomas said, get the hell out of palestine, syria and anywhere else it has occupied territory. israel is the worlds worst criminal regime.
This article is crap, utter crap. It's no wonder nobody claimed authorship of this tripe, as it's just another hasbarium enema.
Yes, the media of the world do have a short memory.
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/sep/28/brian-williams-iran...
http://original.antiwar.com/Ted_Snider/2013/09/24/is-iran-just-fooling-us/
http://antiwar.com/blog/2013/09/24/no-sanctions-did-not-prompt-irans-new...
http://original.antiwar.com/buchanan/2013/09/23/is-iran-the-fourth-reich/
http://original.antiwar.com/giraldi/2013/08/14/who-is-the-wolf-in-sheeps...
http://original.antiwar.com/muhammad-sahimi/2013/04/02/the-long-history-...
Evidence? Also, the anti-Semitic canard has been worn out by overuse. Be specific. If you mean anti-Jewish, or anti-Israeli, or anti-Israeli government, say it. Semitic can refer to Palestinians, Syrians, Lebanese, Jordanians, and some, but certainly not all, Jews.
Iran has the right to enrich uranium unter the terms of the NPT and is in full compliance with its obligations under the NPT.
The rest of the article is simply recycled ad hominem, propaganda, and rubbish. Again, it is no surprise that the author is ashamed to attach his/her name to it.
I haven't seen anyone point out that Pivotfarm got the date wrong. The bombing was in 1994, not 1984.
Gareth Porter has several articles casting doubt on the investigation and finger pointing at Iran.
http://www.thenation.com/article/bushs-iranargentina-terror-frame
The only "evidence" given that Rouhani isn't a moderate is his supposed link to the bombing. So if that's BS, he must not be a mad mullah after all. How awful to contemplate foreign policy with the State Department using diplomacy instead of the military dropping bombs. I hope Banzai is right about target practice, but I'm not so sure.
Mr Pivot Farmer - his website has, in the past, given the name 'Andrew Milne' as being behind it
Sometimes he spouts some really terrible shite, like above
That so-called 'anti-Semitic bombing' in Argentina that PivotFarmer - Andrew Milne cites above, and blames on Iranian President Rouhani in his younger days -
That was apparently another murderous Mossad false-flag operation by the Israelis themselves
Pivot Farmer - Andrew Milne is indeed very weird in the articles, and have no consistent positions, sometimes okay, sometimes absurdly pro-fascist wrong
They seem to 'go both ways', like Obama with his wife and Reggie Love
Yes, strange. We never hear the MSM report on the Boy Bush and Obomba regimes.