Americans Are Finally Learning About False Flag Terror

George Washington's picture

Painting by Anthony Freda

Governments Admit They Carry Out False Flag Terror

Governments from around the world admit they carry out false flag terror:

  • A major with the Nazi SS admitted at the Nuremberg trials that – under orders from the chief of the Gestapo – he and some other Nazi operatives faked attacks on their own people and resources which they blamed on the Poles, to justify the invasion of Poland. Nazi general Franz Halder also testified at the Nuremberg trials that Nazi leader Hermann Goering admitted to setting fire to the German parliament building, and then falsely blaming the communists for the arson
  • Soviet leader  Nikita Khrushchev admitted in writing that the Soviet Union’s Red Army shelled the Russian village of Mainila in 1939, and declared that the fire originated from Finland as a basis launching the Winter War four days later
  • Israel admits that an Israeli terrorist cell operating in Egypt planted bombs in several buildings, including U.S. diplomatic facilities, then left behind “evidence” implicating the Arabs as the culprits (one of the bombs detonated prematurely, allowing the Egyptians to identify the bombers, and several of the Israelis later confessed) (and see this and this)
  • The CIA admits that it hired Iranians in the 1950′s to pose as Communists and stage bombings in Iran in order to turn the country against its democratically-elected prime minister
  • As admitted by the U.S. government, recently declassified documents show that in the 1960′s, the American Joint Chiefs of Staff signed off on a plan to blow up AMERICAN airplanes (using an elaborate plan involving the switching of airplanes), and also to commit terrorist acts on American soil, and then to blame it on the Cubans in order to justify an invasion of Cuba. See the following ABC news report; the official documents; and watch this interview with the former Washington Investigative Producer for ABC’s World News Tonight with Peter Jennings.
  • 2 years before, American Senator George Smathers had suggested that the U.S. make “a false attack made on Guantanamo Bay which would give us the excuse of actually fomenting a fight which would then give us the excuse to go in and [overthrow Castro]“.
  • And Official State Department documents show that – only nine months before the Joint Chiefs of Staff plan was proposed – the head of the Joint Chiefs and other high-level officials discussed blowing up a consulate in the Dominican Republic in order to justify an invasion of that country. The 3 plans were not carried out, but they were all discussed as serious proposals
  • A U.S. Congressional committee admitted that – as part of its “Cointelpro” campaign – the FBI had used many provocateurs in the 1950s through 1970s to carry out violent acts and falsely blame them on political activists
  • The South African Truth and Reconciliation Council found that, in 1989, the Civil Cooperation Bureau (a covert branch of the South African Defense Force) approached an explosives expert and asked him “to participate in an operation aimed at discrediting the ANC [the African National Congress] by bombing the police vehicle of the investigating officer into the murder incident”, thus framing the ANC for the bombing
  • An Algerian diplomat and several officers in the Algerian army admit that, in the 1990s, the Algerian army frequently massacred Algerian civilians and then blamed Islamic militants for the killings (and see this video; and Agence France-Presse, 9/27/2002, French Court Dismisses Algerian Defamation Suit Against Author)
  • Senior Russian Senior military and intelligence officers admit that the KGB blew up Russian apartment buildings and falsely blamed it on Chechens, in order to justify an invasion of Chechnya (and see this report and this discussion)
  • According to the Washington Post, Indonesian police admit that the Indonesian military killed American teachers in Papua in 2002 and blamed the murders on a Papuan separatist group in order to get that group listed as a terrorist organization.
  • The well-respected former Indonesian president also admits that the government probably had a role in the Bali bombings
  • As reported by BBC, the New York Times, and Associated Press, Macedonian officials admit that the government murdered 7 innocent immigrants in cold blood and pretended that they were Al Qaeda soldiers attempting to assassinate Macedonian police, in order to join the “war on terror”.
  • Former Department of Justice lawyer John Yoo suggested in 2005 that the US should go on the offensive against al-Qaeda, having “our intelligence agencies create a false terrorist organization. It could have its own websites, recruitment centers, training camps, and fundraising operations. It could launch fake terrorist operations and claim credit for real terrorist strikes, helping to sow confusion within al-Qaeda’s ranks, causing operatives to doubt others’ identities and to question the validity of communications.”
  • United Press International reported in June 2005:

    U.S. intelligence officers are reporting that some of the insurgents in Iraq are using recent-model Beretta 92 pistols, but the pistols seem to have had their serial numbers erased. The numbers do not appear to have been physically removed; the pistols seem to have come off a production line without any serial numbers. Analysts suggest the lack of serial numbers indicates that the weapons were intended for intelligence operations or terrorist cells with substantial government backing. Analysts speculate that these guns are probably from either Mossad or the CIA. Analysts speculate that agent provocateurs may be using the untraceable weapons even as U.S. authorities use insurgent attacks against civilians as evidence of the illegitimacy of the resistance.

  • Undercover Israeli soldiers admitted in 2005 to throwing stones at other Israeli soldiers so they could blame it on Palestinians, as an excuse to crack down on peaceful protests by the Palestinians
  • Quebec police admitted that, in 2007, thugs carrying rocks to a peaceful protest were actually undercover Quebec police officers (and see this)
  • At the G20 protests in London in 2009, a British member of parliament saw plain clothes police officers attempting to incite the crowd to violence
  • A Colombian army colonel has admitted that his unit murdered 57 civilians, then dressed them in uniforms and claimed they were rebels killed in combat
  • U.S. soldiers have admitted that if they kill innocent Iraqis and Afghanis, they then “drop” automatic weapons near their body so they can pretend they were militants
  • The highly-respected writer for the Telegraph Ambrose Evans-Pritchard says that the head of Saudi intelligence – Prince Bandar – recently admitted that  the Saudi government controls “Chechen” terrorists

So Common … There’s a Name for It

This tactic is so common that it was given a name for hundreds of years ago.

“False flag terrorism” is defined as a government attacking its own people, then blaming others in order to justify going to war against the people it blames. Or as Wikipedia defines it:

False flag operations are covert operations conducted by governments, corporations, or other organizations, which are designed to appear as if they are being carried out by other entities. The name is derived from the military concept of flying false colors; that is, flying the flag of a country other than one’s own. False flag operations are not limited to war and counter-insurgency operations, and have been used in peace-time; for example, during Italy’s strategy of tension.

The term comes from the old days of wooden ships, when one ship would hang the flag of its enemy before attacking another ship in its own navy. Because the enemy’s flag, instead of the flag of the real country of the attacking ship, was hung, it was called a “false flag” attack.

Indeed, this concept is so well-accepted that rules of engagement for naval, air and land warfare all prohibit false flag attacks.

Leaders Throughout History Have Acknowledged False Flags

Leaders throughout history have acknowledged the danger of false flags:

“This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when he first appears he is a protector.”
- Plato

“If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.”
- U.S. President James Madison

“A history of false flag attacks used to manipulate the minds of the people! “In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations, and epochs it is the rule.”
? Friedrich Nietzsche

“Terrorism is the best political weapon for nothing drives people harder than a fear of sudden death”.
- Adolph Hitler

“Why of course the people don’t want war … But after all it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship … Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”
- Hermann Goering, Nazi leader.

“The easiest way to gain control of a population is to carry out acts of terror. [The public] will clamor for such laws if their personal security is threatened”.
- Josef Stalin

People Are Waking Up to False Flags

People are slowly waking up to this whole con job by governments who want to justify war.

More people are talking about the phrase “false flag” than ever before.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Clashfan's picture

Terrific job, GW. Thanks.

g speed's picture

Not so much learning about false flags as begining to believe your country's gov't is a perp IMHO. 

esum's picture

be ready for the IRANIAN nuke attack on the east coast and the nuke attack on israel that will ignite WWIII.... thank you obama / kerry et al. 

Zionist Jew's picture

Israel can take care of herself...


Thank you GW for not mentioning the attack on the USS Liberty, which the anti-Semites love to bark about, along with so called Israeli involvement in the 9/11 attacks.


IDF mistook the Naval Vessel for an Egyptian supply ship and it was an accident, just look on youtube for testimony from any of the Liberty survivors... they will tell you it was a simple mistake.

MeelionDollerBogus's picture

NO,  they say they identified themselves multiple times to the Israeli jets and those jets made multiple pases after getting identification, seeing the American flag, etc., and kept firing.

esum's picture

if you believe THE OPPOSITE of what obumbler or congress democrats say... you wont be far from the truth

Vlad Tepid's picture

You left out the Mukden Incident where the Japanese military bombed their own troop train in order to blame a nearby Chinese army unit and launch  the invasion of Manchuria.

Shylockracy's picture

George Washington,

With all due respect, you should be careful in mentioning the Gleiwitz incident as a paragon of historical false flags.

Poland mobilized ist military on 23 March 1939 which, by itself, means Poland was a beligerent state vis-à-vis Germany. This, and the mistreatment and/or massacres of German, Czech and Hungarian minorities placed under Polish rule by the Treaty of Versailles also attest to a latent state of war.

In any case, let's go to your source for the information: Wikipedia.

If you read carefully the article on Gleiwitz, and trace the source of the information, you will realize that there is no documental base to it other than the testimony of an German intelligence major during the Nuremberg Trials.

Now by clicking on his biographical note also at Wikipedia, you can read this little bit of information:

"At the Nuremberg Trials, Naujocks declared the attack against German Radio Tower in Gleiwitz was under orders from Heinrich Müller, the head of Gestapo and his superior, Reinhard Heydrich. Interestingly, there no other references to this incident outside of Naujocks, himself, according to Mallmann-Showell.

After the war, having escaped from custody, he worked as a businessman in Hamburg, where he also sold his story to the media as The Man who Started the War."


The so called Gleiwitz incident seems just one of those outrageous post-war fabrications that pass for history nowadays.



rationaldemocracy's picture

That's right vote me down...strength in numbers is what your kind are all about.


rationaldemocracy's picture

You are an apologist for the Nazi party, we know your kind.



Zionist Jew's picture

Damn right, ZH is rife with Nazi scum!

Haven't read through the thread yet but I will wager there are more than a few references to the Mossad... "By way of deception thou shalt do war."

I also expect to encounter a few spastic clowns sputtering about the innocent Israeli men "caught" on 9/11 with explosives... PFFFTT!

Even if it were the case, goyim are ignorant herd animals with zero critical thinking ability.  The USA will always be Israel's bitch...bitches!

Shylockracy's picture

Absolutely not. Socialists, be they National (NSDAP), International (Trotzkyites), or Stalinists are equally repellent to me.

It is not easy to accept that the "Good War" was not really a contest of Good v. Evil as you have been taught in school, but with some effort you may overcome the fabricated fairy tale you presently take for a world-view.

rationaldemocracy's picture

Oh come on you cannot be serious

Hitler's Mein Kampf spells out in extreme, explicitly, highly vested detail how he plans to annihilate the Jews, Russians and Poles as he and his Nazi party view them as sub humans. His book was the bible of the Nazi party.

There are no excuses for germany, zero, zilch, nada.

I am sure you will have also a really good explanation for the concentration camps right?

Shylockracy's picture

Israel is the only state today that embodies racial supremacy as the Nazis did. Moreover, like the Nazis of yesteryear, Israel is a corporative socialist polity driven by militarism.

I would have resisted the nazis of the past, just as I gladly resist Zionism, today's racial supremacists.


Now about ethnic cleansing + concentration camps, it seems Brits applied the system with success in their extermination war against the Boers, then it was used by the Bolcheviks from 1918 to about 1990, by the Nazis from 33 to 45, by the Chinese since 1949 and by the Israel from 1948 to date. Nothing new under de sun, eh?

In any case, you don't seem to know what your talking about. End of our exchange.

ToNYC's picture

Lies are radioactive, their half-life variable with the Speed of Truth, which like Light travels best in a vacuum and not so much in smoke and mirrors.

rationaldemocracy's picture

You don't fool me NAZI supporter

You started the argument by stating that Poland was to blame for Germany exterminating 1/3 of it's population during the war..I simply pointed out that that was the plan of the NAZI party all along, as EVIDENCED and WELL DOCUMENTED in Hitler's Mein Kampf.

You are now trying to tell me that everyone does it and you use ISRAEL as an example of racial supremacy (specifically against Arab Palestinians), the same country that HAS ALLOWED ABOUT 15% OF ITs population to consist of ARABS - THIS Little fact CONTRADICTS your own argument, does it not?

I can smell a NAZI supporter a mile away, I know the gist of ALL THEIR is always about painting Germany as the victim, never as the aggressor well you've been found you may as well speak your pathetic mind freely on the matter and just admit that you support extremist views.


Zionist Jew's picture

Amen racionaldemocracy!!!

Germany under the lunacy of Hitler refused to abide by the Versailles Treaty and blamed their economic woes of the 20's on the SUBVERSIVE JOOS!  Never forget 6 million helpless Jews, gassed, made into soap, lampshades, and experimented on by raging pyschopaths like Mengele.


My grandfather was gassed at Buchenwald 5 times and his skin was used to make a leather chair for an SS officer, but fortunately the rest of my family made it out.  

superflex's picture


Drop the Alinsky tactics.  Name calling, villifying and ad hominem attacks are weak.

Troll somewhere else.

rationaldemocracy's picture

What's weak is zero hedge being a home for extremist ideas and few if any people doing anything about it.

Well they won't come for me becaue I am standing up for what's right right here and now.

MeelionDollerBogus's picture

Agreed. The one trolling you, saying his grandfather was gassed 5 times.. it's cyanide gas. You don't need 5 times. seriously. No one's immune to cyanide.

You normally troll HARD as an Obamabot but today you're not.

Trampy's picture



Inmate of open-air prison run by lunatics and populated almost entirely by zombies is desperately seeking a pen-pal ... because God gave Eve to Adam, and Aldous Huxley gave someone to Winston Smith.

For mutual support in these trying times, am seeking fellow non-zombie intelligent, open-minded, and well-informed inmate for discussing topics of mutual interest, such as:

  1. Both actual and notional nuclear accidents, and nuclear technology of all sorts;

  2. Historical Revisionism of WW1 and WW2 as a battle of truth-telling historians versus the well-funded OSS/CIA myth-telling “historians” per Harry Elmer Barnes, 1889–1968;

  3. John Kenneth Galbraith as an exceptionally honest economist, JFK's ambassador to India;

  4. Bankers v. The People going way back to Andrew Jackson;

  5. contemporary Capitalist Crisis as predicted by Karl Marx;

  6. 1984, Alice in Wonderland, and The Wizard of Oz as works of history;

  7. Newspeak, shunning, straw man, murder, etc. as effective social controls;

  8. as island of sanity, albeit sorely lacking collegiality; and

  9. identifiable weaknesses in the prison system which might allow its escape.


Spanky's picture

OK Trampy, I'll bite. Am looking for a kindred spirit myself, but...

...rather doubt I'm in the upper reaches of intelligencia and, while I'd like to think Phil successfully resisted, I'm afraid pgp is compromised (since the late ninties). And, while I like your list, number nine is the cat's meow...

MisterMousePotato's picture

" ... albeit sorely lacking collegiality ... ."

Bon mot, Sir. Bon mot.

The Heart's picture

Leave it to the women of the country to speak out.

Quite unlike the panty-lace waring men who shudder in corners of self-deceit.

jonjon831983's picture

"Former Department of Justice lawyer John Yoo suggested in 2005 that the US should go on the offensive against al-Qaeda, having “our intelligence agencies create a false terrorist organization. It could have its own websites, recruitment centers, training camps, and fundraising operations. It could launch fake terrorist operations and claim credit for real terrorist strikes, helping to sow confusion within al-Qaeda’s ranks, causing operatives to doubt others’ identities and to question the validity of communications.”"


Sounds a bit like: Body of Lies (

Flammonde's picture

Talk all you like.  You won't do anything because when you do it will be as a result of an agent provocateur.  I am reminded of Heorodotus in this context:

[Periander] had sent a herald to Thrasybulus and inquired in what way he would best and most safely govern his city. Thrasybulus led the man who had come from Periander outside the town, and entered into a sown field. As he walked through the wheat, continually asking why the messenger had come to him from Cypselus, he kept cutting off all the tallest ears of wheat which he could see, and throwing them away, until he had destroyed the best and richest part of the crop. Then, after passing through the place and speaking no word of counsel, he sent the herald away. When the herald returned to Cypselus, Periander desired to hear what counsel he brought, but the man said that Thrasybulus had given him none. The herald added that it was a strange man to whom he had been sent, a madman and a destroyer of his own possessions, telling Periander what he had seen Thrasybulus do. Periander, however, understood what had been done, and perceived that Thrasybulus had counselled him to slay those of his townsmen who were outstanding in influence or ability; with that he began to deal with his citizens in an evil manner.

Aristotle uses Herodotus' story in his Politics, (1284a) referring to Thrasybulus' advice to Periander to "take off the tallest stalks, hinting thereby, that it was necessary to make away with the eminent citizens".

The specific reference to poppies occurs in Livy's account of the tyrannical Roman KingTarquin the Proud. He is said to have received a messenger from his son Sextus Tarquinius asking what he should do next in Gabii, since he had become all-powerful there. Rather than answering the messenger verbally, Tarquin went into his garden, took a stick, and symbolically swept it across his garden, thus cutting off the heads of the tallest poppies that were growing there. The messenger, tired of waiting for an answer, returned to Gabii and told Sextus what he had seen. Sextus realised that his father wished him to put to death all of the most eminent people of Gabii, which he then did.[1]

Alcoholic Native American's picture

Have they figured out 9/11 was a false flag yet?

MisterMousePotato's picture

What're you talking about? They found them terrist's passports right at the base of the World Trade Centers, and they were in perfect condition, so there is no doubt about who did it.

Tompooz's picture

yeah, and they found a Koran in their hire car. No doubt at all.

Notarocketscientist's picture

America is teamed up with Al Nusra and Al Qaeda in Syria attacking Assad.  Figure that out.

el Gallinazo's picture

Excellent article, GW.  Thank you.  Only wish you had exposed the term, Project Gladio, in the article and gone into a little more depth on it.  Perhaps in a future article?  It is a piece of fruit ripe for the picking.

piceridu's picture

GW, again just want to say thank you for keeping the torch lit. You are a true patriot

DaveyJones's picture

(from Lee Havery Oswald's Markmenship)

No one has ever duplicated the marksmanship attributed to Oswald.

The CBS Reenactment Test

CBS news did a reenactment in 1967 involving several expert riflemen firing from a 60 foot tower at a moving sled using a similar Mannlicher-Carcano rifle.

None of these expert riflemen hit the target twice on their first try and 7 of them failed to do so on any try.

They also were able to fire several practice rounds before the test.

Warren Commission Tests

The Warren Commission’s tests were equally bad. The WC paid 3 expert riflemen to duplicate Oswald’s alleged feat. These shooters fired 18 rounds using Oswald’s gun and scope.

They fired 3 rounds with just the iron sites. These shooters missed the head and neck area of the target 18 out of 18 times using the telescopic sight and 2 out of 3 times when they used the iron sites.

Some of the shots missed the target completely. They were able to take as long as they wanted for the first shot. They were firing from a height of only 30 feet. Oswald fired from a height of 60 feet. They were also shooting at stationary targets instead of a moving limousine.

Oswald’s Marine Background

Former Marines recall that Oswald was a poor shot.

Nelson Delgado said Oswald on the firing line was “a pretty big joke” because he got a lot of complete misses.

Delgado told researcher Mark Lane that Oswald just was not that interested in guns. He was always being penalized for not taking proper care of his rifle or cleaning it regularly.

Sherman Cooley, another Marine, said “If I had to pick one man in the entire United States to shoot me, I’d pick Oswald. I saw the man shoot. There’s no way he could have ever learned to shoot well enough to do what they accused him of doing in Dallas.”


Henry Hurt, author of “Reasonable Doubt” interviewed many of Oswald’s fellow Marines. Hurt said “On the subject of Oswald’s shooting ability, there was virtually no exception to Delgado’s opinion that it was laughable.

Many of the Marines said that Oswald had a certain lack of coordination that they felt was responsible for the fact that he had difficulty learning to shoot.”

More Facts

When he was a member of a hunting club in Minsk, Russia Oswald’s fellow members considered him a bad marksman.

Craig Roberts was a former Marine sniper who later wrote a book on the JFK assassination called “Kill Zone.” Roberts visited the 6th floor window of the Texas School Book Depository and instantly realized that Oswald could not have performed the shooting feat because he knew that he himself could not. And he was a professional.

Roberts interviewed Sergeant Carlos Hathcock, the former senior instructor at the Marines Corps Sniper Instruction School at Quantico, Virginia. Roberts asked Hathcock if he thought Oswald could have done what the Warren Commission said he did. Hathcock said no.

Hathcock reconstructed the assassination at Quantico: the angle, moving target, time limit etc. he told Roberts, “I don’t know how many times we tried it, but we couldn’t duplicate what the Warren Commission said Oswald did.

Again, we are talking about professionals. Men who completely outclass Oswald in raw shooting ability. But further, these are professional assassins who practice their skills almost daily.”

Dean Andrews, an attorney in New Orleans who met Oswald testified before the Warren Commission.

Andrews said “I know good and well Oswald did not kill the President. With that weapon, he couldn’t have been capable of making 3 controlled shots in that short time. I am basing my opinion on 5 years as an ordnance man in the Navy.


You just don’t pick up a rifle or a pistol or whatever weapon you are using and stay proficient with it. You have to know what you are doing. This boy could have connived the deal, but I think he is a patsy.”

Diogenes's picture

According to official Dallas Police sources, if there were fingerprints on the murder weapon none of them were Oswald's.

Parrafin tests done after Oswald's arrest proved he had not fired a rifle that day but had fired a pisol.

A palm print was found inside the murder rifle after it was taken to pieces.

All this tells us 1) If Oswald's rifle was the murder weapon, he was not the murderer and 2) he did not know his rifle was going to be used or he would not have left his hand print on it the last time he cleaned it.

Tim_'s picture

John F. Kennedy's Secret Service bodyguards were called off - video

"What this clip shows is the stand down order being given out by a ranking CIA guy to one or more agents attempting to get into their usual positions where they stand on the specially made foot platforms of the presidents car. Lots of ppl comment on JFK refusing to have a hard topped car for the motorcade which was needed for Texas [loadsa right wing oil magnet types] which is true but he was expecting the BASIC security protocol to take place as usual."

"You'll see the agent hold up his hands in disbelief as the car is allowed to move off without anyone on the platforms... even the motorbike cops were moved back to allow the space for the impending CROSSFIRE from behind and the grassy/knoll and/or picket fence."

MisterMousePotato's picture

Yeah. Someone explain how Lee Harvey pulled that off.

Also, the poster above points out the difficulties expert marksmen had hitting the target, but my understanding based on something I read decades ago, is that no one has been able to simply load and fire the weapon LHO purportedly used as quickly as he purportedly did. (Forget about actually hitting anything.) They just couldn't even fire it as quickly even aiming at the sky. (Please, someone, if I'm wrong in thinking this - and I've been thinking this a long time - please disabuse me.)

joe90's picture

And besides; the best the best shot from the depository alone would have been while the motocade was approaching the depository rather than after it turned the corner and was triangulated.

LawyerScum's picture

very nice article GW, did not know about a couple of these false flags. 

Escapedgoat's picture

In Greece Recently A professional Hitman (Double taped ) 3  Golden Dawn supporters (2 dead the third seriously injured), another got away, in front of The organisation's North Athens Branch. That was blatantly from a similar Deep state apparatus. The Greeks screamed False Flag immediately. There was apparently a similar to Gladio organisation called RED HIDE.  I Think they run out of ideas.

rationaldemocracy's picture

Golden dawn is a far right fascist party with close ties to European neo-fascists moverment



Zionist Jew's picture

Damn right!  All Golden Dawn Nazis should be locked inside of Gaza and sunk into the sea with the Palestinian terrorists

MeelionDollerBogus's picture

methinks the lady doth trolleth too hard.

Running On Bingo Fuel's picture

There will be consequences.


Fishhawk's picture

@williegroper:  perhaps you do not perceive the total energy available in weather events/storm systems.  The elite would have you believe that they can control the weather, but entropy says otherwise.  Look somewhere else for your conspiracy...


el Gallinazo's picture

True, HAARP and similar installations around the world cannot generate enough energy from whole cloth to fabricate a hurricane, but they can effect enormous leverage to control paths and perhaps even strength.  The path of a hurricane can be controlled by heating the ocean on the side desired just in front of the hurricane which will veer toward the water with a higher temperature gradient.  BTW, I studied entropy in college until I was sick of it, but I have no idea why you choose to throw this word around.  Maybe it intimidates people.  One thing to always remember is that the laws of entropy always apply to a closed system, so always make sure that a system is closed before you accept an entropic statement about it.

MeelionDollerBogus's picture

entropy applies to all systems, open or closed.
No part of the universe is immune to entropy, even black holes now proven to have x-ray evaporation.

Aiming a hurricane - unproven but theoretically possible with enough power (we don't have it) is easier than generating it (we don't have that much either).

Nor could any quakes be caused by it first due to the energy even for the leverage being far too small, orders of magnitude too small, but also because there's no shaped antenna to induct to. Mere heating & melting isn't enough: we flat out can't see the structure within fault lines over / in molten rock, and given some of it's melted already, trying to melt it as if it had not been already would be futile.

Radical Marijuana's picture

Again, I agree with you, el Gallinazo!

I think that a billion watts of directed energy, at appropriate frequencies, could cause a lot of things to happen, which were apparently mentioned in the original patents for the HAARP technology in the first place.

In my experience, there is no end to the apparently infinite tunnels of deceits regarding everything that I have attempted to research more deeply.

I often rhetorically ask,

"How far down the rabbit hole does Alice go?"

or "How far up the tornado does Dorothy go?"

Personally, I rather enjoy the intellectual challenge of attempting to apply the concepts of thermodynamics and information theory to human cases. E.g., as in the book The Entropy Law and the Economic Process.

Since there actually are no closed systems, I believe we should think about entropy in the opposite way that we currently tend to do. I repeat that I regard it as extremely important that the current entropy equations had an ARBITRARY MINUS SIGN INSERTED, so that the measurements of power and information would end up having positive values, rather than negative values.

Since Energy is the scientific God, while Entropy is the scientific Satan, understanding those things backwards is extremely important in order to understand how it came to be that we live inside of a Bizarro Mirror World, where pretty well everything is backwards, as exemplified by the history of successful false flag attacks.

Since there are no closed systems, but only relatively subtracted parts from the Whole, and since the history of the philosophy of science has been the victim of the triumph of the biggest bullies' bullshit social stories, like every other social enterprise has been, I regard SUBTRACTION as the most important concept, from which all other concepts flow.

For instance, after one subtracts an organism from its environment, then it MUST, by definition, across that defined boundary, act as an entropic pump, which means that the basic English word of "robbery" applies, namely, that it must take energy (matter) from its environment, in order to live, since its life is a living fire, which needs more fuel to keep burning. Furthermore, since, by definition, life forms are living fires, that can spark new fires, by reproduction, thus, there always needs to be more fuel, to keep more fires burning, except that evolutionary ecologies develop as dynamic equilibria in those conditions. All of those basic concepts apply to human beings, and human civilizations.

In general, energy systems are controlled by their most labile component, which, in human terms, means that civilizations are controlled by the most dishonest and violent people, who specialize in doing things like false flag attacks.

In general, energy systems flow along their path of least action, or least resistance, which, in human terms, means that civilizations manifest the least possible morality, such as illustrated by false flag attacks used to start deceitful wars.

However, I would point out that there are chronic political problems inherent in the nature of life itself, which must be resolved somehow. That is why I HAARP on the need for more profound intellectual scientific revolutions to cope with all the other the issues raised by the fact that false flag attacks have been common throughout history, and that all the governments in the Anglo-American (Zionist) world are being almost totally dominated by the history of their previously successful false flag attacks.

Of course, I have nothing practical to offer, since I am just as vulnerable to being murdered as anyone else. However, I try to get by with some of consolations of philosophy, that follow from comprehending that we were taught to understand the concept of "entropy" backwards, as were we apparently taught almost everything else about human history backwards.

el Gallinazo's picture

Agree that in this Universe there are really no closed systems, so on a deep philosophical level the concept of entropy is flawed.  But when dealing with beakers and flasks, it can be really useful in calculating free energy exchanges.