This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

The Most Boring Superbowl Ever … Until 9/11 Truth Proponent Interrupts MVP Interview

George Washington's picture





 

This clip has gotten a lot of media attention … almost as much as Peyton Manning explaining why the football hit his helmet on the very first play (leading to a safety, and the fastest score in superbowl history).

Winning Seahawks coach Pete Carroll also questions 9/11. As do some old-timers, like 5-time NFL Pro Bowl center Mark Stepnoski (Dallas Cowboys and Houston Oilers) and former NFL running back Bill Enyart (Buffalo Bills and Oakland Raiders).

What do you think? How many of you think:

(1) The government couldn’t have foreseen 9/11, and did everything it could to minimize the damage (while perhaps being negligent in its foresight, coordination, communication, priorities or execution)?

(2) 9/11 was an inside job carried out by rogue elements of the U.S. government as a “false flag attack“?

(3) The government knew the attack was coming, but allowed it to succeed to justify the launching of the war for oil – er, I mean the “War on Terror” – and to consolidate power and crackdown on liberties at home?

 


- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Tue, 02/04/2014 - 21:08 | Link to Comment satoshi911
satoshi911's picture

911 Solved - Truth Found - 911 AIPAC Urban Myth Unveiled

A nation of retarded hair-lips (USA) can never understand that 19 teenagers with box-cutters took down the USA and cost the USA 10-20 TRILLION USD in damage, one of the reasons for INFINITE FIAT, that will eventually destroy the USA, was replacing that LOST money.

Make NO mistake '911' destroyed the USA.

Why the 'conspiracy theory', because the GOVERNMENT doesn't want  the hairlips to KNOW that 19  teenage punk's could bring down airliners.

*

The Arabs these guys invented ALGEBRA, when white people were still living in caves and scibbling on walls and eating human flesh. The PTB wants the US public to believe in Grand FUCKING conspriacy.

Because truth be told you supposed to believe that 'sand niggers' are dumb and stupid, if it was COMMON KNOWLEGE that 19 teenagers could destroy ameriKKKa you might have copy-cats and such.

Thus the URBAN-MYTH is taught to morons that it had to be an INSIDE CIA job, cuz nobody is this SMART.

*

The truth is the Occam's razor theory, if you peel back the narrative to its simplicity,you will find the truth.

The truth is that 19 teenage saudi boys destroyed ameriKKKa, and the PTB can't stand that truth.

Sat, 02/15/2014 - 16:49 | Link to Comment merizobeach
merizobeach's picture

You have spewed so much bullshit on this thread that it's time for you to take dirt nap, asshole.  You and moneybots are gov shills.

Tue, 02/04/2014 - 18:17 | Link to Comment The Heart
The Heart's picture

Who profits in war? The People, or the babylonians?

Iraq For Sale:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Zt9BZD7mlc

The Greatest Lie Ever Sold:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U5hBwCYVdPw

Missing Links:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GD_vwzjdTi4

 

Tue, 02/04/2014 - 17:33 | Link to Comment sosoome
sosoome's picture

Actually GW, I didn't find the game boring at all. Granted it was lopsided, but watching a fairly potent offense get picked apart in such a manner was quite the show.

Tue, 02/04/2014 - 15:42 | Link to Comment Winston Smith 2009
Winston Smith 2009's picture

You don't provide enough choices. I choose #4:

(4) The 9/11 attacks succeeded due to a lack of communication between typical, bloated, inefficient government agencies due to their bureaucratic stupidity and incompetence. They had all the info they needed to stop the attacks and did not need the ~$1 TRILLION worth of police state infrastructure installed since then.

Watch the following for my justification in saying that. Note that the first documentary is NOT some stupid "Truther" garbage and the second is by James Bamford who has written three books on the NSA, all of which I've read:

9/11 - Press for Truth (full movie)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iMT2CHSvyGw

PBS Nova: The Spy Factory

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/military/spy-factory.html

Tue, 02/04/2014 - 17:32 | Link to Comment SamAdams
SamAdams's picture

Two planes hit two towers and brought three down.  That's like killing two birds with one stone, family guy style.

Anyway, little press was given to the third, and for good reason.  It is the smoking gun.  Why did that building fall in the most obvious controlled demolition manner?  Would you say, "They knew it was structurally impaired.  So on the same day, they managed to plan and attach all demolition charges to bring it down by 5pm."?  Or would you say, "there was a fire in the copy room, it melted the beams to liquid steel and everything fell down instantly"?  This sounds like a good American's rationale to me...

Or would you say, "people get the government they deserve"? 

How about Senator Rockefeller blocking investigation of the Pentagon? 

Flight 93?  Rumsfeld (Defense Sec not Frankenstein's associate) told the armed forces it was shot down.  Whoops!  Where is fuselage at the crash site???????????? 

Good Christian American's never question authority.  Just like they never wonder why a "pagan" Egyptian obelisk stands at the center of the Christian headquarters (that's the vatican for you slight minded good Christian Americans). 

Now go back to sleep and dream a dream of spreading freedom and democracy to those uncivilized other countries, somewhere around the world.

Tue, 02/04/2014 - 16:29 | Link to Comment Ignatius
Ignatius's picture

"Note that the first documentary is NOT some stupid "Truther" garbage..."

9/11 - Press For Truth is a good primer, but there is much more.

The fact that you use "truther" in the pejorative says something... not good.

Don't confuse serious inquiry with disinfo horseshit.

September 11 - The New Pearl Harbor by Massimo Mazzucco   Best by test.

http://www.luogocomune.net/site/modules/sections/index.php?op=viewarticl...

Tue, 02/04/2014 - 15:20 | Link to Comment BlackVoid
BlackVoid's picture

Not rogue elements, but the same people who own the US government. And your ass too.

Tue, 02/04/2014 - 13:28 | Link to Comment pherron2
pherron2's picture

"But Mills' gate-crashing leaves people wondering: With all of the millions spent on security, how safe is the Super Bowl anyway?"   http://www.nj.com/super-bowl/index.ssf/2014/02/super_bowl_2014_911_truth...

 

We are change, just another facet of the conspiracy

 

Tue, 02/04/2014 - 15:48 | Link to Comment sgt_doom
sgt_doom's picture

The Lesson of the Super Bowl

As in most things and events in life, there is frequently a lesson to be learned and such was the case with the Super Bowl yesterday at New Jersey's MetLife Stadium.

MetLife, an insurance company, several years back, became an overnight bank holding company in order to access those TARP bailout funds (taxpayer funds), and for no reason other than to access those funds.

Did they use some of those funds to pay bonuses to their senior executives?

Most assuredly, as did Citigroup with their hedge fund manager, Jack Lew, our present secretary of the treasury!

For all we know, Citi might have even paid Lew's entire salary --- plus bonuses --- from those TARP bailout funds, 'cause it's all Cloak & Dollar, baby!

GO HAWKS !!!!!

Tue, 02/04/2014 - 13:21 | Link to Comment GIABO
GIABO's picture

roger that

Tue, 02/04/2014 - 12:44 | Link to Comment GIABO
GIABO's picture

Manipuflation... NORAD did not respond cause they were ordered to"stand down"... 9/11 was a classic "stand down" "false flag" operation.

Tue, 02/04/2014 - 13:17 | Link to Comment Manipuflation
Manipuflation's picture

Agreed.  I thought I clearly stated that in my post.   

 

"I believe our military was told to fail that day and stand down."

Tue, 02/04/2014 - 12:35 | Link to Comment ItsDanger
ItsDanger's picture

There are MUCH easier ways to accomplish what 9-11 truthers want you to believe.  Incompetence is the answer.  They are more concerned with siphoning as much money away as possible.

Tue, 02/04/2014 - 16:38 | Link to Comment Nassim
Nassim's picture

Incompetence does not fly 3 aircraft with a very high degree of skill into 3 buildings. The trajectory of the "aircraft" (it might have been a drone) that hit the Pentagon was extremely difficult to execute. It was done in order to hit the side of the Pentagon where there were few people (an recently reinforced building).

To make two skyscrapers fall into their own footprints is a highly-skilled undertaking. A lot of simulations were done by computer to find where best to place the explosives - over a period of months.

These guys are not amateurs.

Read "Debunking 9/11 Debunking: An Answer to Popular Mechanics and Other Defenders of the Official Conspiracy Theory"

http://www.amazon.com/Debunking-11-Mechanics-Defenders-Conspiracy/dp/156...

Tue, 02/04/2014 - 16:03 | Link to Comment sgt_doom
sgt_doom's picture

Of course, incompetence is always THE ANSWER:  of the US Chamber of Commerce, the Business Roundtable, the Trilateral Commission, the Group of Thirty, the Bretton Woods Committee (brettonwoods.org), the CFR and the Peterson Institute.

And those people continue to walk away with billions and trillions of what they call wealth transfer, and the rest of us know to be wealth theft!

When it is announced that $2.3 trillion in unaccounted for DoD funds are missing, and the auditing team responsible for uncovering this, the Defense Intelligence Agency's Financial Management staff, are almost completely wiped out on 9/11/01, after directed to attend an emergency meeting in the west wall conference room, by an email sent out on 9/11/01 at 2:00 AM, such "incompetence" beings to peal away.

And when an incredible surge in data communication and wire transfer traffic is uncovered (due to the Internet evolving and cached pages of communications traffic being accessed later in 2003) originated from the the companies situated at the two crash areas of the Twin Towers of the WTC (Cantor Fitzgerald, who would later become a primary dealer, Marsh AG and Deutsche Bank's computer/communications ops center), further "incompetence" is pealed away.

And when the make-up of some of those unfortunate passengers aboard those four airliners that day is delved into, and three unique groups and three unique persons emerge, further "incompetence" is pealed away to reveal the obvious truths.

And when Robert McKeon***, then owner of Veritas Capital, which in turn owns Raytheon Aerospace, whose remote piloting hardware/software developers are aboard several of those planes that day, along with other subcontractors to them, is found to have committed "suicide" by strangling himself, people truly become suspicious!

Facts don't scare the ethically sane, but they sure do scare the rest of you! 

(Interestingly, McKeon would later purchase DynCorp, the private military contractor [McKeon had made numerous defense related acquisitions just prior to 9/11], DynCorp was half-owner of DynPort, an anthrax vaccine mfr. situated right next to Ft. Detrick, supposed origination point of the Anthrax attacks.  The other owner was El-Hibri, a former banker type of Lebanese extraction who was also owner of BioPort, which was subsidized by the US gov't, thanks in part to the work of SecDef Cohen, to be the single source mfr. of Anthrax vaccine to the US gov't and military.  Today DynPort is owned by CSC, and Bruce Ivins was declared by the FBI to be the culprit, much the same way they "declared" those poor youngsters in Libery City/Miami to be "terrorists".)

Tue, 02/04/2014 - 12:07 | Link to Comment Manipuflation
Manipuflation's picture

This has been an interesting thread so thank you GW.  All I can say is that there a dozens of holes in the official story.  I have flown a Cessna 152 and Cessna 172 in the air after some instruction.  How confident would you be in my ability to all of a sudden fly a 350,000 lb, 180 foot long Boeing 767 airliner having never done so before if you were on board? 

Most people have never flown a plane and know very little about aviation so they can get away with bullshitting an official story.  I might be able to keep the plane from going into a nosedive for a few minutes but I would be on the intercom telling you to find a parachute while looking for a lower altitude and trying to figure out the avionics.  Where is the owner's manual for this fucking thing?  Supposedly these 19 terrorists trained on propeller driven Cessna's and then became instant turbojet pilots who possessed a tremendous degree of accuracy on their very first attempt. 

Then you have the transponder story.  The terrorists just turned them off and no one could find them.  Why the fuck have we been paying NORAD for all of these years for then?  Hello?  Even a Russian Air Force General came out the day after and said something along the lines of "Hell, if we had known it was this easy to attack the U.S. we would have blown up Washington D.C. a long time ago."  (That comment has long since been scrubbed from the web but occasionally resurfaces)  Indeed.

This is not about being a "truther".  It is about what the facts are and probability.  What were the odds?  Where was the military reponse that day?  We hear all sorts of platitudes about our military and how they protect our "freedoms" on a non-stop rotation but where were they that day when we needed them most?  We did not spend enough on Defense or what?  What is the excuse for this lapse?  I believe our military was told to fail that day and stand down.  Someone in the miltary finally disobeyed orders and that the last plane was shot down.  The debris field suggests this to be true but I can not prove ths assertion.

I will never believe the official story.  It was a pretext for war in the Middle East.  Hussein had threated to go off the dollar for pricing oil.  No terrorists ever seem to attack the Fed for some reason.  Perhaps because a terrorist will not attack a fellow terrorist?                 

Tue, 02/04/2014 - 16:07 | Link to Comment sgt_doom
sgt_doom's picture

Great comments, Manipulation guy, and pertaining to:

"Then you have the transponder story.  The terrorists just turned them off and no one could find them."

More to the point, several of the airliners first turned their planes and flew into "dark zones" where transponders become invisible for short periods prior to turning them off, so they couldn't be picked up, period!

Secondly, only two of the four airliners appeared in the FAA commercial registry, because the other two were DoD Special Charters, which are never officially listed:  they are mandated to take off at the specified time with those DoD pax aboard, but all remaining empty seats may be sold commercially.

Tue, 02/04/2014 - 12:56 | Link to Comment Mi Naem
Mi Naem's picture

"No terrorists ever seem to attack the Fed for some reason. "

That really is a frustrating fact, isn't it? 

Tue, 02/04/2014 - 12:20 | Link to Comment moneybots
moneybots's picture

"I have flown a Cessna 152 and Cessna 172 in the air after some instruction.  How confident would you be in my ability to all of a sudden fly a 350,000 lb, 180 foot long Boeing 767 airliner having never done so before if you were on board? "

 

Atta was a certified pilot.  Atta hijacked the jetliner and flew it into WTC1.  I don't care about your ability, Atta was capable.  He flew the jetliner, not you.

All planes have certain things in common, regardless of size.  

Tue, 02/04/2014 - 16:08 | Link to Comment sgt_doom
sgt_doom's picture

Cut to the chase:  who were the three unique groups and three unique persons aboard those four airliners that day?

Why haven't you looked into this glaringly obvious fact?

Why continue on parsing everything?

Tue, 02/04/2014 - 13:58 | Link to Comment daemon
daemon's picture

" All planes have certain things in common, regardless of size.  "

Yes , they all need air and wings .

Apart from that, directing a ~1 ton cessna at 150 mph against a tower is relatively easy . Directing a ~200 tons  b757/767 at 400 mph against a tower seems to be .... more difficult . A slight alignment error, some hundreds of meter from the target, apparently tend to rapidly become impossible to correct ... and you miss the target .

It seems that you need to be pretty well trained to fly on that kind of plane, to do what was done that day .

Tue, 02/04/2014 - 14:07 | Link to Comment moneybots
moneybots's picture

"Apart from that, directing a ~1 ton cessna at 150 mph against a tower is relatively easy . Directing a ~200 tons  b757/767 at 400 mph against a tower seems to be .... more difficult ."

 

Not that much more difficult, especially for Atta, who flew straight in on the north wall of the North Tower.

The hijacker flying flight 175 did miss the center of the building, but being that it was 205 feet wide, he struck it anyway, even though he did not fly straight in on it, as Atta did.

Tue, 02/04/2014 - 16:11 | Link to Comment sgt_doom
sgt_doom's picture

As a former member of the USAF, every single pilot I've spoken to contradicts you, and I've spoken to quite a few, sonny!

Tue, 02/04/2014 - 17:19 | Link to Comment moneybots
moneybots's picture

"As a former member of the USAF, every single pilot I've spoken to contradicts you, and I've spoken to quite a few, sonny!"

 

I am sure you have, but the truth speaks for itself, regardless.  Atta did hijack flight 11 and flew it into 1 World Trade.  It is documented that he took flying lessons and obtained certification.   That he obtained instructional videos for a 757.  A 767 is not a cessna, but all planes have similar flight controls, just as a truck, car and bus have a steering wheel and brakes.  It was not impossible for Atta to fly the flight 11, 767.  He knew enough to be able to control the aircraft in flight.  He didn't have to know any fancy maneuvers like doing barrel rolls.  He just had to turn the plane to the south, toward NYC and eventually decend altitude and line the jet up with 1 World Trade.

 

 

Tue, 02/04/2014 - 17:06 | Link to Comment sosoome
sosoome's picture

Read "The Big Bamboozle" by Philip Marshall for insight on the training of 911 pilots. Marshall held captain rating on 727, 737, 747, 757, and 767. He also once flew for Barry Seal.

Tue, 02/04/2014 - 16:00 | Link to Comment daemon
daemon's picture

" Not that much more difficult, especially for Atta, who flew straight in on the north wall of the North Tower. "

Sorry, you are simply repeating the official story.

There were 2 towers, and it would have taken 2 rather experienced pilots, probably specifically trained to fly that kind of planes, to do that .

Try to ask questions to b757/b767 pilots themselves to understand differences between Cessnas and b757/b767.

Tue, 02/04/2014 - 17:25 | Link to Comment moneybots
moneybots's picture

 

" Not that much more difficult, especially for Atta, who flew straight in on the north wall of the North Tower. "

Sorry, you are simply repeating the official story."

 

Video showed that flight 11 flew straight in on the north wall of 1 World Trade.  Atta hijacked the flight and had been trained as a pilot in the U.S.  I don't need any official story to know that.

 

 

Tue, 02/04/2014 - 17:52 | Link to Comment daemon
daemon's picture

" Atta hijacked the flight and had been trained as a pilot in the U.S.  I don't need any official story to know that. "

Ah ? Interesting. You don't need to know the official story to write that Atta hijacked a plane ? 

You are smarter than I thought .

Tue, 02/04/2014 - 12:43 | Link to Comment Manipuflation
Manipuflation's picture

Atta flew all four jetliners simultaneously?  Fucking incredible.  Now answer the rest of the questions or shut your mouth.

Tue, 02/04/2014 - 14:01 | Link to Comment moneybots
moneybots's picture

"Atta flew all four jetliners simultaneously?  Fucking incredible.  Now answer the rest of the questions or shut your mouth."

 

Atta was one hijacker pilot and flew one jetliner.  The other hijacker pilots also had training.  None of the hijackers had to take off or land, they only had to contol the plane in the air.  It was not an impossible task.

Tue, 02/04/2014 - 10:43 | Link to Comment Mi Naem
Mi Naem's picture

The guy is Matthew Mills from Brooklyn, a long time 911 activist. 

He seems to have only been arrested for trespassing, and released on his own recognizance. 

See a good story about him at http://www.nj.com/super-bowl/index.ssf/2014/02/super_bowl_2014_911_truth...

Creative, gutsy guy. 

Tue, 02/04/2014 - 11:13 | Link to Comment Mi Naem
Mi Naem's picture

BTW, learn more about Mills, his work, and his compatriots at:

http://wearechange.org/

https://www.youtube.com/user/wearechange

 

 

Tue, 02/04/2014 - 09:42 | Link to Comment Debt Slave
Debt Slave's picture

"It's very good. ... it will generate immediate sympathy." - BiBi Netanyahu, September 11, 2001

Tue, 02/04/2014 - 09:25 | Link to Comment dizzyfingers
dizzyfingers's picture

What was in WTC7?

Tue, 02/04/2014 - 16:11 | Link to Comment sgt_doom
sgt_doom's picture

Thousands of original source document files which concerned ongoing SEC investigations.  No source docs, no cases!

The SEC, invoking the national emergency clause within the Securities Act, allowed for hundreds of billions of dollars worth of securities to be traded without the normal oversight and clearance.

Tue, 02/04/2014 - 10:19 | Link to Comment cynicalskeptic
cynicalskeptic's picture

Google is your friend 

NYC's emergency command center was located there but more importantly, a number of investigations into financial crimes were being run by the SEC and other offices there - all of which ceased after 9/11.

WTC 7 was not hit by a plane and shows evidence of a controlled demolition

Tue, 02/04/2014 - 12:21 | Link to Comment sosoome
sosoome's picture

"WTC 7 was not hit by a plane and shows evidence of a controlled demolition"

I've studied how it fell, debris patterns, and structural remains. There is no sign of CD. I'd be intrested in what evidence you refer to.

No, it wasn't hit by a plane, but it was hit by 50+ tons of plummeting steel from the North Tower.

http://wtc7fact.wordpress.com/2014/01/31/world-trade-center-7-the-gash/?...

Tue, 02/04/2014 - 16:13 | Link to Comment sgt_doom
sgt_doom's picture

Dipshit, you don't understand squat about compound resistance!

I'll bet you didn't even pass high school physics.

Tue, 02/04/2014 - 16:26 | Link to Comment sosoome
sosoome's picture

Corroborate your theory with solid structural evidence, and you've made a sale. All I can find are buckled, bent, and broke structural members (at their connectors). Then, publish an analysis of how the building fell and identify how Cd was used. Til then, name calling  serves your purpose not.

Tue, 02/04/2014 - 17:00 | Link to Comment sgt_doom
sgt_doom's picture

Aside from the fact that youtube vids have long been extant online to address your flimsy comments, three structures do not collapse in a steady state manner due to the existance of compound resistance, the floors weren't exactly alike, especially regarding the Twin Towers.

Anyone with the least bit of structural engineering background is aware of this, which is why so many structural engineers the world over came out against the NIST explanations.

Go back and view the vids, sonny, and you are still a complete and total douchetard.

Tue, 02/04/2014 - 17:17 | Link to Comment sosoome
sosoome's picture

Funny ain't it, that I can find today tons of video and photographic evidence of the structural remains of all 3 collapsed buildings? Have you even tried to look in order to corroborate your theory? Or do you rely soley on general terms such as "steady state manner" and "compound resistance"?

Here's something to ask your structural engineers: what structural element assumed lateral and diagonal load after WTC7 suffered it's top to near bottom gash on the south face?

 

Tue, 02/04/2014 - 12:28 | Link to Comment wtf1369
wtf1369's picture

50+ tons of debris (I'll buy that) that primarily impacted one corner of the building and yet still it defied gravity (and logic) and managed to symmetrically fall into a pile in its own footprint.

Tue, 02/04/2014 - 12:40 | Link to Comment sosoome
sosoome's picture

Read the link I posted. It actually sliced the building near in half.

There was nothing symmetrical about collapse.

Tue, 02/04/2014 - 17:28 | Link to Comment moneybots
moneybots's picture

"Read the link I posted. It actually sliced the building near in half.

There was nothing symmetrical about collapse."

 

That is correct.

Tue, 02/04/2014 - 17:02 | Link to Comment sgt_doom
sgt_doom's picture

We have viewed the collapse of Build 7 many, many times, and your comment is null and void.

Tue, 02/04/2014 - 17:20 | Link to Comment sosoome
sosoome's picture

How so? Be specific, if you can...

Wed, 02/05/2014 - 15:50 | Link to Comment akarc
akarc's picture

whoops

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!