This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
The Most Boring Superbowl Ever … Until 9/11 Truth Proponent Interrupts MVP Interview
This clip has gotten a lot of media attention … almost as much as Peyton Manning explaining why the football hit his helmet on the very first play (leading to a safety, and the fastest score in superbowl history).
Winning Seahawks coach Pete Carroll also questions 9/11. As do some old-timers, like 5-time NFL Pro Bowl center Mark Stepnoski (Dallas Cowboys and Houston Oilers) and former NFL running back Bill Enyart (Buffalo Bills and Oakland Raiders).
What do you think? How many of you think:
(1) The government couldn’t have foreseen 9/11, and did everything it could to minimize the damage (while perhaps being negligent in its foresight, coordination, communication, priorities or execution)?
(2) 9/11 was an inside job carried out by rogue elements of the U.S. government as a “false flag attack“?
(3) The government knew the attack was coming, but allowed it to succeed to justify the launching of the war for oil – er, I mean the “War on Terror” – and to consolidate power and crackdown on liberties at home?
»
- advertisements -
I haven't clicked on every link above so forgive me if this was already posted but here is a link to 911 In Plane Sight.
Anyone who watches this in its entirety and still believes the story fed to them by the mainstream media is completely retarded.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=igX7Z8VstN4
I'm refering to the official story.
Yep, a worthog may have shot it down per witnesses.
It's just so much worse than that.
http://www.silverbearcafe.com/private/11.12/black911.html
Great vid. Names names and connections.
Many layers.
Without question it was #2, how the fuck would NORAD stand down otherwise? And anyone who watches building 7 come down and doesn't realize it's a controlled demolition is fucking hopelessly dependent on the matrix to live otherwise.
Compelling evidence is there for anyone who actually looks at it - there is little doubt that it was done by elements of the US govt, and CIA and Mossad assets.
The FAA changed the distressed aircraft (hijack) protocol 90 days prior to 9/11 eliminating quick response to such an event. The old protocol had a fast response (fighter interception and verification of plane) and a slow response, and had been in service for 30 years. The day after 9/11 the protocol changed back to the old protocol.
Incidentally, they had the biggest hijack drill in history with false aircraft all over all the radar scopes, and sent all the QRF fighters into the Atlantic chasing phantom bogies. Then the Pentagon didn't pick up the phone when Boston center was trying to scramble fighters.
I do declare shenanigans.
"The FAA changed the distressed aircraft (hijack) protocol 90 days prior to 9/11 eliminating quick response to such an event."
"But lo and behold, earlier this month when 15-year-old student pilot Charles Bishop absconded with a Cessna and flew it into a Tampa skyscraper, NORAD didn't learn of it until it overheard FAA radio calls about the situation, and it wasn't able to launch its fighter jets until 15 minutes after Bishop had already crashed into the building. Those fighters didn't arrive on the scene until 45 minutes after Bishop took off."
comparing a kid stealing a Cessna to multiple hijackings of major commercial aircraft?
comparing Tampa to the Pentagon?
you'll have to do better
"comparing a kid stealing a Cessna to multiple hijackings of major commercial aircraft?
comparing Tampa to the Pentagon?"
No, i am comparing time frames. The cessna incident was after 9/11 and the military was slow to respond then as well.
speaking of comparing time frames, compare the last frames of the ONLY footage released from 85 cameras reecording the Pentagon hit and ...they make no sense and are clearly doctored. One camera is in front of the other and should clearly show the plane at the point of impact but SOMEONE or SOMETHING has brushed the image.
KEEP TRYING
AND ENJOY YOUR FEDERAL BENEFITS PACKAGE
DC has alert and heavily armed fighters at the ready 24/7/365 to bring aircraft on-station in 5 minutes or less. It's the most heavily defended airspace in the world. Fighters from Quantico can be there in 3 minutes.
Nobody cares about Tampa. Also the protocol was changed so FAA had to call the pentagon to get permission to scramble. That hasn't been the case at any point in near history except for a 90 day window ending on 9/12/2001. Not even NORAD could scramble fighters on 9/11.
"Nobody cares about Tampa. Also the protocol was changed so FAA had to call the pentagon to get permission to scramble. That hasn't been the case at any point in near history except for a 90 day window ending on 9/12/2001. Not even NORAD could scramble fighters on 9/11."
I can see that you don't care about Tampa, because it ruins the story of the military being able to get jets anywhere on a moments notice after 9/11.
"Standing orders on September 11 dictated that, upon receiving a request for assistance from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) would normally order escort aircraft to approach and follow an aircraft that was confirmed to be hijacked..."
"At 8:21, the aircraft (now visible only on primary radar) began to veer radically off course. At 8:25, the controller heard what he believed was the voice of a hijacker in a radio transmission from Flight 11. The Boston Center called the FAA Command Center at Herndon at 8:28 to report the hijacking. At 8:32, Herndon called FAA Headquarters in Washington. At 8:34, Boston Center contacted Otis Air National Guard (ANG) base to notify them of the hijacking.[14] The controller at Otis directed Boston to contact NORAD's Northeast Air Defense Sector (NEADS), and then informed the Otis Operations Center to expect a call from NEADS ordering a scramble. At this time two pilots began to suit up and drove to their waiting F-15 fighter jets.[15][16][17] At 8:38, Boston Center contacted NEADS in Rome, New York. This was the first report of a hijacking that reached NORAD.[6]"
The government simply doesn't care about Tampa. Washington on the other hand is *again* the most heavily defended airspace in the world. There are alert fighters on-station with their only purpose being to defend DC's airspace. Quantico, Andrews, Dover, etc, etc.
Those fighters are regularly drilled to be flying over DC within 3 minutes, and they are, except one day, 9/11. That day they changed the hijack protocol, and nobody would answer the phone to scramble fighters. They made it purposefully impossible to scramble fighers that day.
It's also something they do routinely. Aircraft lose their radios from time to time, and under the old protocol, and current one, fighter interceptors meet the plane and verify it. It actually happens pretty often.
Your absurd arguments aren't fooling anybody. Your propoganda isn't working. You should pack your bags and go run off to wherever the fascist pigs are calling refuge these days. Justice will come, and you are not immune.
"And anyone who watches building 7 come down and doesn't realize it's a controlled demolition is fucking hopelessly dependent on the matrix to live otherwise."
Nonsense.
look you fucker.
building 7 collapsed from the top and middle.
It collapsed at freefall speed
It collapsed into its own footprint
It collapsed after minimal damage and a low intensity fire of several hours.
Its collapsed resulted in a flowing cloud of pulverized concrete.
The energy to both destroy all the structural steel so the building could collapse straight down and pulverize the concrete and eject it out in a flowing cloud is more energy than existed in the entire building.
The collapse at freefall speed into its own footprint is a signature of controlled demolition.
The ejection of clouds of pulverized concrete is a signature of explosives.
There is no other conclusion for the collapse of building 7 than intentional controlled demolition.
The implications are more than most people can bear, so their minds refuse to entertain it.
dont make me tell you again
"There is no other conclusion for the collapse of building 7 than intentional controlled demolition."
Nonsense.
wow, the science in that response
I think you are complicating it (although all highly intelligent points, don't misunderstand, please) for the morons --- I just state that the three buildings collapsed in a steady state mode, as if all compound resistance were removed that day (which occurs in controlled demolitions).
The Litmus Test
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=21pPpYw_axQ
just to confirm, you are advocating that the official story is totally legit and there is nothing to question here at all?
He is a money bot.
I will answer that for him/her, there is plenty to question without who actually flew the planes into buildings. Like why was there a stand-down? Who was in the energy meeting with Chenney? All of Geo's questions ever never been addressed in public that is. Who really cares about the mechanics of how the buildings came down, but how it was allowed. Was it really true the Bin Laden family was allowed to leave Texas the same day? So as you see, even I who think all the destruction can be explained by plane impacts have questions that are light years more important then how, the why and who are the real questions. That is how I see it, sorry if that offends the passionate.
Forget the thousands of “coincidences” and myriad details, in a typical homicide investigation, they always investigate those closest to the victims, and the obvious victims that day were those passengers aboard the four airliners. Look into the backgrounds and three unique groups, and three unique individuals (personal targets of opportunity) appear.
End of story!
He's a product of your tax dollars at work to steer public opinion.
To answer your question, it's either (2) or (3). There is no doubt that we need a new 9-11 investigation. Independent body, Subpeona power, put people under oath.
The process is the problem, we don't need an independent body, we want a diverse body that includes some of the biggest loud mouth skeptics (competent and thorough skeptics), because they will ensure the committee staff runs down all the leads before they sign their name to a report, and they will demand more outside staffers. You also need the insiders who know exactly which rocks to turn over. "Blue Ribbon Commissions" are nothing more than crusty establishment curmudgeons whoring their reputations by rubber stamping the Ministry of Truth's version of events.
Even if we got another investigation what on this green earth makes you think there will be a different answer/explanation? The NWO will make sure no one will ever have a chance to say otherwise.
You mean like having Bush and Cheney testify separately instead of together? Under oath?
Wouldn't that be a riot.
Bush will never be allowed to speak on this matter.
"Bush will never be allowed to speak on this matter."
You can bet that if you kidnapped poppy bush and tortured him in gutanamo for a few years, you could fill the library of congress with all that nazi henchman could tell. Cheney too!
Sounds like a plan. Any disgruntled Colonels want in on this?
Whoever did that will make sure that no independent investigation happens, whatever it takes.
And since there hasn't been, that means the highest levels of government are complicit. End of story.
9-11
Kennedy
Ft. Knox not audited in what, 60 years?
Gulf of Tonkin
USS Liberty
Osama Bin Laden somehow surviving for 8+ years longer than any other human on Earth with the same disease, while crawling around in mud and eating cold goat
Osama's supposed assassins getting blown from the sky, in the greatest loss of Seal Team members, ever.
Etc. Etc. Etc.
mmmmmmmm
cold goat
Maybe Putin or Snowden can help clear this up once and for all. I think I see a drone outside my window.
Without a doubt #2
Next thing you know you will be saying they wanted The Japs to Hit Pearl Harbor /Sark
It was the Germans who bombed Pearl Harbor.
I have it on the highest authority: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V8lT1o0sDwI
You are on double secret probation.
I would NEVER say that ...
DHS ordering another 500 million rounds after that.
At next year's presser there might be one of those shooters, like in the picture from Indianapolis from that recent ZH article, set up in the back of the room.
DHS orders
another 3 big airplanes
Come on G-Dub, it's been proven that the plane was modified, i.e. there were missile-y things on the bottom. The spark before the impact, the vaporized metal vs. the untarnished documents surviving skyscraper collapse... shit man, you gotta be dumb as bricks to not put the dots together.
how did aluminum planes penetrate a steel and concrete building? those vids of the planes were fabricated in a hollywood studio
No they were not.....It is not about Material Hardness or Brittleness. It is all about ENERGY.
Did you know that Water Cuts Steel?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wPYwrFwQrN4
It is about Kinetic Energy. The aircraft had Mass traveling at high speed.
Well the Kinetic Energy = 1/2 X Mass X (Speed)2 . This is a similar form to an iconic equation that you know, E = mc2
Have you ever seen a Straw forced into a tree by a Tornado?
Here is a photo...
http://cutcaster.com/photo/800981627-Straw-Lodged-in-Oak-Tree-From-Tornado/
Again it is due to the Speed of the Straw in the Tornado Winds. The tree is obviously harder than the straw.
It is not about hardness.