This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
KeeP CaLM...
- advertisements -
Contact Information:
Tips: tips [ at ] zerohedge.com
General: info [ at ] zerohedge.com
Legal: legal [ at ] zerohedge.com
Advertising: ads [ at ] zerohedge.com
Abuse/Complaints: abuse [ at ] zerohedge.com
Suggested Reading:
Make sure to read our "How To [Read/Tip Off] Zero Hedge Without Attracting The Interest Of [Human Resources/The Treasury/Black Helicopters]" Guide
It would be very wise of you to study our disclaimer, our privacy policy and our (non)policy on conflicts / full disclosure. Here's our Cookie Policy.
you know i don't know how many people have been killed by flying bankers but its worth considering when you decide which part of the sidewalk you will walk down
It is also puzzling how these people get easy security access to the roof. At least the nail gun comes with directions that say DO NOT NAIL YOURSELF MORE THAN 15 TIMES.
"Hand Shadows"...
Can't stop laughing.
Hahaha! Nice, BUT, shouldn't that read, "FALL YOU FUCKERS"?
Since that's what I keep reading on Bloomberg....
i was hoping you wouldn't forget frau today
@WilliamBanzai7
Check this photo out which is also currently on the top of Drudgereport right now. What a classic photo of a Hitler shadow mustache from Netanyahu's finger perfectly placed below Merkel's nose!!! Thought you might laugh at this one as I did! lol
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/bibi-merkel-photo-makes-waves_783416.html
She almost looks a little bit like Hilter with a wig on...especially around the eyes, nose, and shadow "stache". lol
he's giving her the Dirty Sanchez (figuratively)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YDW2MhjdIMk
A more simple model in favor of the 1%
Maximum possible equality on the base - chaotic inequality in total and the extinction of middle class
http://failedevolution.blogspot.gr/2014/02/a-more-simple-model-in-favor-...
Off Topic
But did you guys catch this on drudge? WB7 you have to be able to do something with this:
unfrigging believable
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BhUvh_jCAAEs1aS.jpg
Picture saved for further reference...'The New Hitlers'...
WB7 might not like it, but I sure as hell did!
Well said. And, central bankers could easily be included in that group of tyrannical powers that be. Right?
something weird is going on...
where o where is Mt. Gox gone to?
Based on "quisling" and "diktat" I'd say he's not US born. Should have compressed the writing. The size of the document implies, grandiose pomposity. Yes there is truth here and some old fashioned american independent spirit. If he had cut it by 75% it might be taken seriously. As is it is Kazinski-esque. I could not follow this fellow into the gates of hell. In fact my instincts tell me Mossad by way of the British Isles.
Having said that I'd say to the ruling elite (pig fuckers), stop with the gun control crap before its too late. By provoking armed comflict you play a dangerous game, more dangerous than continually poking through the chain link at the Doberman with a stick, a stick that can't defend you, as implied above.
You couldnt follow this guy anywhere, let alone the gates of hell. You're shaking in your boots is whata you are. 'd bet you have no problem whatever with following your political class though. You suck shit
NICE. Just nice.. :)
Thank you Mr. Banzai for posting this.
there is no main post here, only comments.
is this something new? the comments refer
to a post so something must be
amiss.
There is most certainly a main post here. It came from Manipuflation.
The frontline is everywhere
AD
It's happening to me too, even when I click on the thread title itself.
I just commented about this on the Mt. Gox thread...
I'm experiencing the same effect. if you go to the posts you'll see them, but if you follow the comment links on the right the post is missing
the post has returned now. that was strange.
it's a new bug. imo it happens only if you follow the right-hand comment links
it happens only if you follow the right-hand comment links
nope, got it right now from clicking the main link up top.
perhaps a new adblock, et al workaround?
the problem was also evident on other zerohedge post.
There are getting to be some ornery folks out there it seems.
The following letter was sent via email to members of the Connecticut State Police, Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection. There are 1,212 email addresses on the list. There were 62 bounce-backs.15 February 2014
To the men and women of the Connecticut State Police and the Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection:
My name is Mike Vanderboegh. Few of you will know who I am, or even will have heard of the Three Percent movement that I founded, though we have been denounced on the national stage by that paragon of moral virtue, Bill Clinton. Three Percenters are uncompromising firearm owners who have stated very plainly for years that we will obey no further encroachments on our Second Amendment rights. Some of you, if you read this carelessly, may feel that it is a threat. It is not. Three Percenters also believe that to take the first shot in a conflict over principle is to surrender the moral high ground to the enemy. We condemn so-called collateral damage and terrorism such as that represented by the Oklahoma City Bombing and the Waco massacre. We are very aware that if you seek to defeat evil it is vital not to become the evil you claim to oppose. Thus, though this letter is certainly intended to deal with an uncomfortable subject, it is not a threat to anyone. However, it is important for everyone to understand that while we promise not to take the first shot over principle, we make no such promise if attacked, whether by common criminals or by the designated representatives of a criminal government grown arrogant and tyrannical and acting out an unconstitutional agenda under color of law. If we have any model, it is that of the Founding generation. The threat to public order and safety, unfortunately, comes from the current leaders of your state government who unthinkingly determined to victimize hitherto law-abiding citizens with a tyrannical law. They are the ones who first promised violence on the part of the state if your citizens did not comply with their unconstitutional diktat. Now, having made the threat (and placed the bet that you folks of the Connecticut State Police will meekly and obediently carry it out) they can hardly complain that others take them seriously and try by every means, including this letter, to avoid conflict.
Some of you are already working a major case on me, trying to figure out how I may be arrested for violating Conn. P.A. 13-3, which bears the wildly dishonest title of "An Act Concerning Gun Violence Prevention and Children's Safety." (What part of "protecting children" is accomplished by sparking a civil war?) Not only have I personally violated this unconstitutional and tyrannical act by smuggling and by the encouragement of smuggling, defiance and non-compliance on the part of your state's citizens, but I have further irritated your wannabe tyrant bosses by sending them standard capacity magazines in my "Toys for Totalitarians" program. I further have annoyed them by pointing out -- and seeking more evidence of -- the existence of Mike Lawlor's KGB file (as well as his FBI and CIA counter-intelligence files). In short, I have made myself a nuisance to your bosses in just about every way I could think of. However, their discomfiture reminds me of the wisdom of that great American philosopher of the late 20th Century, Frank Zappa, who said, "Do you love it? Do you hate it? There it is, the way you made it." Whether you will be able to make a case on me that sticks is, of course, problematic for a number of reasons which I will detail to you in the letter below. I have already done so to your bosses and include the links in this email so that you may easily access them.
But even if you are not working on my case you will want to pay attention to this letter, because tyrannical politicians in your state have been writing checks with their mouths that they expect you to cash with your blood. We have moved, thanks to them, into a very dangerous undiscovered country. Connecticut is now in a state of cold civil war, one that can flash to bloody conflict in an instant if someone, anyone, does something stupid. So please pay attention, for Malloy and Co. have put all your asses on the line and are counting on your supine obedience to the enforcement of their unconstitutional diktat.
I apparently first came to your attention with this speech on the steps of your state capitol on 20 April 2013. It was very well received by the audience but virtually ignored by the lapdog press of your state. If I may, I'd like to quote some of the more salient points of it that involve you.
"An unconstitutional law is void." It has no effect. So says American Jurisprudence, the standard legal text. And that's been upheld by centuries of American law. An unconstitutional law is VOID. Now that is certainly true. But the tricky part is how do we make that point when the local, state and federal executive and legislative branches as well as the courts are in the hands of the domestic enemies of the Constitution. Everyone who is currently trying to take away your right to arms starts out by saying "I support the 2nd Amendment." Let me tell you a home truth that we know down in Alabama -- Barack Obama supports the 2nd Amendment just about as much as Adolf Hitler appreciated Jewish culture, or Joseph Stalin believed in individual liberty. Believe what politicians do, not what they say. Because the lie is the attendant of every evil. . .
Before this year no one thought that other firearms and related items would ever be banned -- but they were, they have been. No one thought that the authorities of your state would pass laws making criminals out of the previously law-abiding -- but they did. If they catch you violating their unconstitutional laws, they will -- when they please -- send armed men to work their will upon you. And people -- innocent of any crime save the one these tyrants created -- will die resisting them.
You begin to see, perhaps, how you fit into this. YOU are the "armed men" that Malloy and Company will send "to work their will" upon the previously law-abiding. In other words, this law takes men and women who are your natural allies in support of legitimate law enforcement and makes enemies of the state of them, and bully boy political police of you. So you all have a very real stake in what happens next. But let me continue:
The Founders knew how to answer such tyranny. When Captain John Parker -- one of the three percent of American colonists who actively took the field against the King during the Revolution -- mustered his Minutemen on Lexington Green, it was in a demonstration of ARMED civil disobedience. . . The colonists knew what to do and they did it, regardless of the risk -- regardless of all the King's ministers and the King's soldiery. They defied the King. They resisted his edicts. They evaded his laws and they smuggled. Lord above, did they smuggle.
Now we find ourselves in a similar situation. The new King Barack and his minions have determined to disarm us. We must determine to resist them. No one wants a new civil war (except, apparently, the anti-constitutional tyrants who passed these laws and the media toadies who cheer them on) but one is staring us in the face. Let me repeat that, a civil war is staring us in the face. To think otherwise is to whistle past the graveyard of our own history. We must, if we wish to avoid armed conflict, get this message across to the collectivists who have declared their appetites for our liberty, our property and our lives -- WHEN DEMOCRACY TURNS TO TYRANNY, THE ARMED CITIZEN STILL GETS TO VOTE.
Just like King George, such people will not care, nor modify their behavior, by what you say, no matter how loudly or in what numbers you say it. They will only pay attention to what you DO. So defy them. Resist their laws. Evade them. Smuggle in what they command you not to have. Only by our ACTS will they be impressed. Then, if they mean to have a civil war, they will at least have been informed of the unintended consequences of their tyrannical actions. Again I say -- Defy. Resist. Evade. Smuggle. If you wish to stay free and to pass down that freedom to your children's children you can do no less than to become the lawbreakers that they have unconstitutionally made of you. Accept that fact. Embrace it. And resolve to be the very best, most successful lawbreakers you can be.
Well, I guess at least some of my audience that day took my message to heart. As Connecticut newspapers have finally begun reporting -- "Untold Thousands Flout Gun Registration Law" -- and national commentators are at last noticing, my advice to defy, resist and evade this intolerable act is well on the way. The smuggling, as modest as it is, I can assure is also happening. This law is not only dangerous it is unenforceable by just about any standard you care to judge it by. Let's just look at the numbers mentioned in the Courant story.
By the end of 2013, state police had received 47,916 applications for assault weapons certificates, Lt. Paul Vance said. An additional 2,100 that were incomplete could still come in.
That 50,000 figure could be as little as 15 percent of the rifles classified as assault weapons owned by Connecticut residents, according to estimates by people in the industry, including the Newtown-based National Shooting Sports Foundation. No one has anything close to definitive figures, but the most conservative estimates place the number of unregistered assault weapons well above 50,000, and perhaps as high as 350,000.
And that means as of Jan. 1, Connecticut has very likely created tens of thousands of newly minted criminals — perhaps 100,000 people, almost certainly at least 20,000 — who have broken no other laws. By owning unregistered guns defined as assault weapons, all of them are committing Class D felonies.
"I honestly thought from my own standpoint that the vast majority would register," said Sen. Tony Guglielmo, R-Stafford, the ranking GOP senator on the legislature's public safety committee. "If you pass laws that people have no respect for and they don't follow them, then you have a real problem."
This blithering idiot of a state senator is, as I warned Mike Lawlor the other day, extrapolating. It is a very dangerous thing, extrapolation, especially when you are trying to predict the actions of an enemy you made yourself whom you barely recognize let alone understand. I told Lawlor:
You, you silly sod, are extrapolating from your own cowardice. Just because you wouldn't risk death for your principles, doesn't mean there aren't folks who most certainly will. And, not to put too fine a point on it, but folks who are willing to die for their principles are most often willing to kill in righteous self-defense of them as well. You may be ignorant of such people and their ways. You may think that they are insane. But surely even you cannot be so clueless that, insane or not from your point-of-view, such people DO exist and in numbers unknown. This is the undiscovered country that you and your tyrannical ilk have blundered into, like clueless kindergarteners gaily (no pun intended) tap-dancing in a well-marked mine field. The Founders marked the mine field. Is it our fault or yours that you have blithely ignored the warnings? If I were a Connecticut state policeman I would be wondering if the orders of a possible KGB mole throwback were worth the terminal inability to collect my pension. Of course, you may be thinking that you can hide behind that "thin blue line." Bill Clinton's rules of engagement say otherwise.
The odds are, and it gives me no particular satisfaction to say it, is that someone is going to get killed over your unconstitutional misadventures in Connecticut. And if not Connecticut, then New York, or Maryland, or California or Colorado. And once the civil war you all apparently seek is kicked off, it would not be -- it could not be -- confined to one state.
This is not a threat, of course. Not the personal, actionable threat that you may claim. It ranks right along with -- no, that's wrong, IT IS EXACTLY LIKE -- an ex-con meeting me in the street and pointing to my neighbor's house saying, "Tonight I am going to break in there, kill that man, rape his wife and daughters and steal everything that he is, has, or may become." I warn him, "If you try to do that, he will kill you first. He may not look like much, but I know him to be vigilant and perfectly capable of blowing your head off." That is not a threat from me. It is simply good manners. Consider this letter in the same vein. I am trying to save you from yourself.
For, like that common criminal, you have announced by your unconstitutional law and your public statements in favor of its rigorous enforcement that you have a tyrannical appetite for your neighbors' liberty, property and lives. It doesn't take a crystal ball to see that this policy, if carried to your announced conclusion, will not end well for anybody, but especially for you.
Now let's examine those numbers in the Courant story. You know the size of the Connecticut Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection. Wikipedia tells us that "CSP currently has approximately 1,248 troopers, and is headquartered in Middletown, Connecticut. It is responsible for protecting the Governor of Connecticut, Lieutenant Governor of Connecticut, and their families." There are but 1,212 email addresses listed on the state website to which this email is going, which presumably includes everyone including secretaries, receptionists, file clerks, technicians, etc. Now, how many shooters for raid parties you may find among that one thousand, two hundred and forty eight that Wikipedia cites, or whatever number will be on the payroll when something stupid happens, only you know for sure. I'll let you do the counting. They are daunting odds in any case, and as you will see, they get more daunting as we go down this road that Malloy and Company have arranged for you. (By the way, don't forget to subtract those on the Green Zone protective details, for your political masters will certainly see their survival as your mission number one.) So, how many folks would your superiors be interested in seeing you work their will upon? And of these, how many will fight regardless of cost?
Let's assume that there are 100,000 non-compliant owners of military pattern semi-automatic rifles in your state. I think it is a larger number but 100,000 has a nice round ring to it. Let us then apply the rule of three percent to that number -- not to the entire population of your state, not even to the number of firearm owners, but just to that much smaller demonstrated number of resistors. That leaves you with at least 3,000 men and women who will shoot you if you try to enforce this intolerable act upon them. Of course you will have to come prepared to shoot them. That's a given. They know this. So please understand: THEY. WILL. SHOOT. YOU. (In what they believe is righteous self defense.) Now, if any of them follow Bill Clinton's rules of engagement and utilize the principles of 4th Generation Warfare, after the first shots are fired by your raid parties, they will not be home when you come to call. These people will be targeting, according to the 4GW that many of them learned while serving in Iraq and Afghanistan, the war makers who sent you. This gets back to that "when democracy turns to tyranny, the armed citizenry still gets to vote." One ballot, or bullet, at a time.
This is all hypothetical, of course, based upon the tyrants' appetites for these hitherto law-abiding citizens' liberty, property and lives as well as upon your own willingness to enforce their unconstitutional diktat. And here's where you can do something about it. The first thing you have to realize is that the people you will be targeting do not view you as the enemy. Indeed, you are NOT their enemy, unless you choose to be one.
Again, an unconstitutional law is null and void. Of course you may if you like cling to the slim fact that a single black-robed bandit has ruled the Intolerable Act as constitutional in Shew vs. Malloy, but that will not matter to those three percent of the resistors -- your fellow citizens -- whom you target. They no longer expect a fair trial in your state in any case, which leaves them, if they wish to defend their liberty, property and lives, only the recourse of an unfair firefight. So to cite Shew vs. Malloy at the point of a state-issued firearm to such people is, well, betting your life on a very slender reed.
Thus, my kindly advice to you, just as it was to Lawlor, is to not go down that road. You are not the enemy of the people of Connecticut, not yet. The politicians who jammed this law down the peoples' throats are plainly flummoxed by the resistance it has engendered. In the absence of a definitive U.S. Supreme Court decision do you really want to risk not being able to draw your pension over some politician's insatiable appetite for power?
There are many ways you can refuse to get caught up in this. Passive resistance, looking the other way, up to and including outright refusal to execute what is a tyrannical law that a higher court may yet find unconstitutional and therefore null and void. Do you really want to have to kill someone enforcing THAT? Just because you were ordered to do so? After Nuremberg, that defense no longer obtains. (You may say, "Well, I'm just a secretary, a clerk, you can't blame me for anything." Kindly recall from Nuremberg one other lesson: raid parties cannot break down doors unless someone like you prepares the list in advance. In fact, you have at your keyboard and in your databases more raw, naked power than any kick-in-the-door trooper. And with that power comes moral responsibility. Adolf Eichmann didn't personally kill anyone. But he darn sure made up the lists and saw to it that trains ran on time. When the first Connecticut citizen (or, God forbid, his family) is killed as a result of your list-making, do you think that because you didn't pull the trigger that gives you a moral pass?)
So I call on you all, in your own best interest and that of your state, to refuse to enforce this unconstitutional law. There are a number of Three Percenters within the Connecticut state government, especially its law enforcement arms. I know that there have been many discussions around water-coolers and off state premises about the dangers that this puts CT law enforcement officers in and what officers should do if ordered to execute raids on the previously law-abiding.
You have it within your power to refuse to initiate hostilities in an American civil war that would, by its very nature, be ghastly beyond belief and would unleash hatreds and passions that would take generations to get over, if then.
Please, I beg you to understand, you are not the enemy, you are not an occupying force -- unless you choose to violate the oath that each of you swore to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States against ALL enemies, foreign and domestic. For their part, the men and women who will be targeted by your raids took an identical oath. Can you think of anything more tragic than brother killing brother over some politician's tyrannical appetite?
I can't. The future -- yours, mine, our children's, that of the citizens of Connecticut and indeed of the entire country -- is in YOUR hands.
At the very least, by your refusal you can give the courts time to work before proceeding into an unnecessary civil war against your own friends and neighbors on the orders of a self-anointed elite who frankly don't give a shit about you, your life, your future or that of your family. They wouldn't pass these laws if they thought that they would have to risk the potential bullet that their actions have put you in the path of. They count on you to take that bullet, in service of their power and their lies. Fool them. Just say no to tyranny. You are not the enemy. Don't act like one.
Sincerely,
Mike Vanderboegh
The alleged leader of a merry band of Three Percenters
PO Box 926
Pinson AL 35126
goddam! did that ever git the ole janus-juices flowin!
pinson, alabama...if y'all could only see it. it sure is nuthing, but its nothingness masks a greater something.
WE REDNECKS DO NOT FUCKING PLAY!
you feculent & odious bolsheviks have no clue...not a single iota of a guess what's been in the works for over twenty years. these dumb-ole rednecks saw this shit commin back in the late eighties (i thought they were bat-shit crazy when so many of them took me on tours of their basement gun-shops, their back-woods depots & hideouts, saw cannons carved from surplus CNC machines, homemade gunpowder (with sophisticated refinement), high-explosive manufacture (with MASSIVE stockpiles of precursors (that shit is relatively easy to produce, btw)...setting up dummy p.o. boxes under their 80 year-old aunt's name...on and on and on))
and i suppose i find it odd that the only 'group' these commies have successfully been able to convince concerning the 'evils' of firearms is the jewish community...the very people who -- in light of past 'issues' -- should be stocking up more than any other 'group'. believe what you will, but janus really does pity the jews...they're marching to the pied (read: well paid) piping of their duplicitous leadership. but, hebrews, don't listen to janus (he's a horrible anti-semite because he stands opposed to israeli mendacity)...just keep on believin that all jews stick together (until they don't); they ALWAYS have one-another's back (until expedience subverts this alliance); always keeping an eye out for what's best for judaica (until 'practical' considerations figure into their thinking)...yup, it's all for one and one for all...except, well, those nasty 'capos', those oh-so-few 'traitors' that just ruin it all (cwazy how history rhymes so well).
have y'all ever considered the fact that the 'capos' are running the show for international jewery? just a thought...discuss it amongst yourselves. but, sure, don't listen to janus...blind allegiance to your capos has worked out so very well in the past. yes, the ADL is your friend...they are using those donations to fight us evil goys, people who are so obviously out to get you. i mean, you see it everyday...don't you? well, don't you?
american jewery, get your asses to the gun-shop...now!!! (but please, do take a safety course)
or don't...whatev.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jKUEWLyrDEY
janus
Thanks! Excellent post Manip. That Mike Vanderboegh sure knows how to say it like it truly is.
Manip
Thanks
It's impossible to stand up for your rights without first getting out of bed, or off your ass, and FIRMLY PLANTING TWO FEET ON THE GROUND. More power to him.
I'm a III Percenter
And as the immortal Charlton Heston once perfectly spoke:
"I have 5 words for you: FROM MY COLD DEAD HANDS!"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WTdO-w3xnpw
School Safety Expert Threatened for Questioning Sandy Hook
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6roDPt1WYYY
Hear, hear! Well stated!
I agree on the t-shirt. I'd buy one, IF..... there is an * instead of U in the last word. There is something more on it to imply bankers.
Cheers.
Flokers...
My thought exactly, look like Manip willbe recieving a visit from some black helicopters soon, hope hehas a few anti air missles to cover his get away!
Nice post thought, very nice!
I remain a passive observer, just here to watch nd observe!!!
I hope he has read "Unintended Consequences" by John Ross, it has a good battle plan. Tim McVey indicated he wished he had read it rather than the Turner Diaries., his quote "I would of done things much differently". Looks like Manip and this guy may have put thier eyes upon it. I highly recommend it to any potential revolutionary.
CLOUD CULT - PLEASE REMAIN CALM
His Sunday best includes the helmet of an astronaut
Tablecloth cape, embroidered number 8 sayin'
'I am a proud man, I am a proud man'
Dancin' to the beat of a mother coming down, sing it
Please remain calm
Please remain calm
It's hard to tell the difference of a prophet from a crackpot
I wouldn't blame you if you'd rather stay in bed
We'd go smilin', we'd go down smilin'
Dancin' to the beat of a mother coming down, take it
Please remain calm
Please remain calm
Calm
This is a test of the emergency broadcasting system
This is a test, this is only a test
You can stand single file, put your head between your legs
You can stop drop and roll 'cause this is only a test, kick it
The T-shirt I am wearing at the moment says to keep calm and slave on with silver shield on the back. Maybe we don't want to keep calm and slave on anymore though. Say when.
Just put your shirt on backwards and write the slogan "Buy Silver" under the shield. You'll be fine.
I spoke too soon - this one from your flicker is even better....(Hope I didn't steal your thunder here, but this one is especially good)
Thanks William - thanks for the laugh. brilliant details in this one!
if you're referring to the HAND SHADOWS poster, quite brilliant indeed.
hey bill, your 2014 print looks wonderful framed...a work of art :)
This would make a excellent T-shirt!
Your work lately has been off the charts William - the "I can show you how to turn potaoes into cash" poster had me gasping for breath for about ten minute.
Keep churning out the gold my friend...
BTW- in light of recent events, could you re-port the JP Morgan Russian Mob image with Dimon? Would be very appropriate.
I can think of three different reasons why zazzle would bounce this.
Meantime, I sent them an email asking them to confirm that it is now OK to do parody NSA logos.
Ahem, do you think I have heard back?
edit, wrong spot for comment.
apologies.