This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

“Do You Think That Because I’m CHAIRMAN of The Intelligence Committee That I Just Say “I Want It”, and They Give It To Me? ...

George Washington's picture




 

In 2007, reporter Charles Davis asked then-Chairman of the Senate Intelligence committee – Jay Rockefeller – about clandestine U.S. operations against a foreign government.

Here’s the exchange (listen to the minute plus recording or just listen to the 20-second money quote):

DAVIS: Reports quote administration officials as saying this is going on and it’s being done in a way to avoid oversight of the Intelligence Committee. Is there any way—

ROCKEFELLER: They’ll go to any lengths to do that, as we’ve seen in the last two days [during hearings on FISA].

DAVIS: Is there anything you could do in your position as Chairman of the Intelligence Committee to find answers about this, if it is in fact going on?

ROCKEFELLER: Don’t you understand the way Intelligence works? Do you think that because I’m Chairman of the Intelligence Committee that I just say I want it, and they give it to me? They control it. All of it. ALL of it. ALL THE TIME. I only get -  and my committee only gets -  what they WANT to give me.

This is shocking … but not new.

The NSA was created in secret … and Congress wasn’t even notified.

During the Vietnam war, the NSA spied on two prominent politicians: Senators Frank Church and Howard Baker.  Church was the chairman of the committee investigating wrongdoing by the NSA and other intelligence agencies.

Reuters notes:

This power struggle burst into public view during the Church Committee hearings of the  mid-1970s. The Senate hearings stunned the nation with revelations about CIA assassination plots and illegal activities. The result was the creation of congressional committees designed to give the lawmakers greater control over intelligence.

 

In the aftermath of the horrific September 11 attacks, however, President George W. Bush, aided and abetted by his powerful vice president, Dick Cheney, essentially gave the CIA [and all other intelligence agencies] a free pass to fight the  ”war on terrorism.”

 

***

 

The battle erupted on the Senate floor on Tuesday when Senator Diane Feinstein (D-Calif.), the intelligence panel’s chairwoman and normally a staunch CIA defender, denounced it for allegedly spying on committee investigators and violating the constitutional separation of powers.

 

***

 

The Senate investigators in that basement had discovered an internal CIA study that appeared to agree with many of the Senate report’s critical findings. Senator Mark Udall (D-Colo.) said the internal study “conflicts” with [CIA head] Brennan’s rebuttal. CIA officials suspected that the Senate investigators had obtained unauthorized access to the internal study, and yanked the documents from the  basement computers. Feinstein said Tuesday that the CIA had not only searched the committee’s computers but had referred the matter  to the Justice Department as a criminal case.

The White House has also withheld 9,400 documents from the Senate’s CIA torture investigation.

The Washington Times reported in 2006 that – when high-level NSA whistleblower Russell Tice offered to testify to Congress about this illegal spying – he was informed by the NSA that the Senate and House intelligence committees were not cleared to hear such information:

Renee Seymour, director of NSA special access programs stated in a Jan. 9 letter to Russ Tice that he should not testify about secret electronic intelligence programs because members and staff of the House and Senate intelligence committees do not have the proper security clearances for the secret intelligence.

(And see this.)

Former high-level NSA executive Bill Binney points out how absurd that statement is:

Russ Tice … was prepared to testify to Congress to this, too, and so NSA sent him a letter saying, we agree that you have a right to go to Congress to testify, but we have to advise you that the intelligence committees that you want to testify to are not cleared for the programs you want to speak about. Now, that fundamentally is an open admission … by NSA that they are violating the intelligence acts of 1947 and 1978, which require NSA and all other intelligence agencies to notify Congress of all the programs that they’re running so they can have effective oversight, which they’ve never had anyway.

It was widely reported in 2009 the CIA had hidden a major program from Congress.

To this day, Congress members get more information about NSA spying from reading the newspaper than they get in classified NSA briefings.

Congressman Justin Amash said that the NSA would only divulge information in classified briefings if Congress guessed at the right questions:

Amash said that intelligence officials are often evasive during classified briefings and reveal little new information unless directly pressed.

 

“You don’t have any idea what kind of things are going on,” Amash said. “So you have to start just spitting off random questions. Does the government have a moon base? Does the government have a talking bear? Does the government have a cyborg army? If you don’t know what kind of things the government might have, you just have to guess and it becomes a totally ridiculous game of twenty questions.

A senior staffer for the Chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee – one of the biggest apologists for NSA spying- confirms Amash’s statement:

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said in August that the committee has less information about, and conducts less oversight of, intelligence-gathering that relies solely on presidential authority. She said she planned to ask for more briefings on those programs.

 

“In general, the committee is far less aware of operations conducted under 12333,” said a senior committee staff member, referring to Executive Order 12333, which defines the basic powers and responsibilities of the intelligence agencies. “I believe the NSA would answer questions if we asked them, and if we knew to ask them, but it would not routinely report these things, and in general they would not fall within the focus of the committee.”

In other words, the intelligence agencies are rogue.

Congress Not Informed that the Constitution Was More Or Less Suspended

But perhaps the most dramatic example of the Executive branch wholly stonewalling Congress occurred when Dick Cheney implemented “Continuity of Government” plans on 9/11.  This created a “shadow government” which largely sidelined Congress and suspended the Constitution.  But Congress wasn’t even informed.

As CBS pointed out, virtually none of the Congressional leadership knew that Continuity of Government (“COG” for short) had been implemented or was still in existence as of March 2002:

Key congressional leaders say they didn’t know President Bush had established a “shadow government,” moving dozens of senior civilian managers to secret underground locations outside Washington to ensure that the federal government could survive a devastating terrorist attack on the nation’s capital, The Washington Post says in its Saturday editions.

 

Senate Majority Leader Thomas A. Daschle (D-S.D.) told the Post he had not been informed by the White House about the role, location or even the existence of the shadow government that the administration began to deploy the morning of the Sept. 11 hijackings.

 

An aide to House Minority Leader Richard A. Gephardt (D-Mo.) said he was also unaware of the administration’s move.

 

Among Congress’s GOP leadership, aides to House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert (Ill.), second in line to succeed the president if he became incapacitated, and to Senate Minority Leader Trent Lott (Miss.) said they were not sure whether they knew.

Aides to Sen. Robert C. Byrd (D-W. Va.) said he had not been told. As Senate president pro tempore, he is in line to become president after the House speaker.

CNN reported:

Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle, D-South Dakota, said Friday he can’t say much about the plan.

 

“We have not been informed at all about the role of the shadow government or its whereabouts or what particular responsibilities they have and when they would kick in, but we look forward to work with the administration to get additional information on that.”

Indeed, the White House has specifically refused to share information about Continuity of Government plans with the Homeland Security Committee of the U.S. Congress, even though that Committee has proper security clearance to hear the full details of all COG plans.

Specifically, in the summer 2007, Congressman Peter DeFazio, on the Homeland Security Committee (and so with proper security access to be briefed on COG issues), inquired about continuity of government plans, and was refused access. Indeed, DeFazio told Congress that the entire Homeland Security Committee of the U.S. Congress has been denied access to the plans by the White House.

 

(Or here is the transcript).

The Homeland Security Committee has full clearance to view all information about COG plans.

DeFazio concluded: “Maybe the people who think there’s a conspiracy out there are right”.

University of California Berkeley Professor Emeritus Peter Dale Scott points out that – whether or not COG plans are still in effect – the refusal of the executive branch to disclose their details to Congress means that the Constitutional system of checks and balances has already been gravely injured:

If members of the Homeland Security Committee cannot enforce their right to read secret plans of the Executive Branch, then the systems of checks and balances established by the U.S. Constitution would seem to be failing.

 

To put it another way, if the White House is successful in frustrating DeFazio, then Continuity of Government planning has arguably already superseded the Constitution as a higher authority.

Postscript: Whistleblowers allege that the intelligence agencies are blackmailing Congress.

In any event, the courts don’t have any oversight over the intelligence agencies either:

  • When these judges raised concerns about NSA spying, the Justice Department completely ignored them

 

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Tue, 03/25/2014 - 10:34 | 4589915 George Washington
George Washington's picture

Darkside, do you have a better source specifically on drugs and other illegal ops to fund covert ops?

Tue, 03/25/2014 - 10:58 | 4589982 dontgoforit
dontgoforit's picture

Pimp on the side - you know, for the secret service and such as that...

Tue, 03/25/2014 - 10:04 | 4589767 optimator
optimator's picture

All Jay had to do was go to Israel, who gets alll the raw data from NSA and ask them.  I'm positive they would have given the information to him.

Tue, 03/25/2014 - 10:03 | 4589760 semperfi
semperfi's picture

Its time Congress enacted law to end the current

1. CIA
2. NSA
3. FBI

and start completely over.

Tue, 03/25/2014 - 10:39 | 4589923 Boxed Merlot
Boxed Merlot's picture

Its time Congress enacted law to end the current...

 

 

 

All they have to do is act within their existing authority, i.e. eliminate their access to funding. By issuing US notes and coining constitutional currency, they could drive the federal reserve's crap out of circulation as it's supposedly backed by the interest bearing notes Congress issues anyway.  Why they have to place this impediment between themselves and the people they serve is the reason these constitutional problems develop in the first place.  Our Constitution was designed to work as a whole, this is a prime example of what happens when the purse strings get surreptitiously controlled by unaccountable forces.

jmo.

Wed, 03/26/2014 - 21:09 | 4596723 spqrusa
spqrusa's picture

Yeah - I believe key members of CONgress and the preSIDEnt would be JFK'ed for taking back the power to coin or to run .gov...

Tue, 03/25/2014 - 10:58 | 4589983 semperfi
semperfi's picture

We could solve alot of problems by just going back to the couple sentences in the Constitution that says only gold & silver shall be money.  By just following the law of the land for well over 200 years that is still today in the Constitution.  Imagine that.

Tue, 03/25/2014 - 09:42 | 4589689 Lux Fiat
Lux Fiat's picture

Good stuff GW.  In a similar vein, I found out about Ray McGovern last year (better late than never).  His speeches and interviews certainly cast a different perspective on things.  For those with interest in this area, a thought provoking video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AiMfm4my4dk

Tue, 03/25/2014 - 09:41 | 4589679 Burticus
Burticus's picture

Kabuki theatre.

Since the elephant/jackass sock puppets in CONgress make no effort to DE-FUND the beast, they are complicit.

Got rope?

Tue, 03/25/2014 - 10:10 | 4589792 optimator
optimator's picture

The Congress can't de-fund them, because they have all the goods on 'em.  Mr. Congressman, Zaftig, you remember her, the little girl that spent the night with you last trip to our country, says hello, and if you wish she could send you a copy of the tape recordiing that was made that night for old times sake.  Now, about our small request to you....

Tue, 03/25/2014 - 10:10 | 4589788 semperfi
semperfi's picture

Ultimately you are complicit.  I am complicit. Every American is complicit.  If we are not actively involved in our own governance, if we are not in our representative's ear continually, etc; if we just vote them in and then leave them to their own devices while we go make money, go raise our kids, etc, then we are complicit.  We have let ourselves down.  We only have ourselves to blame.  We have passively chosen to be serfs and to be ruled by kings.  Rinse, repeat.  If we humans are so smart, so evolved, then why do we keep repeating the same bad things over and over?

Tue, 03/25/2014 - 14:55 | 4591195 Gadfly
Gadfly's picture

I couldn't agree more.  Instead of using all of your intelligence and energy to post here (and I see quite a bit of intelligence and energy on this website), you should be in your congressman's (or woman's) ear and face, 24/7, non-stop.  Be the mouse that ROARED!

Tue, 03/25/2014 - 12:47 | 4590497 wtf1369
wtf1369's picture

In case you didn't notice, your CONgress critter doesn't give a fuck what little ol' you thinks. His ears are occupied by big money and as mentioned earlier, the dirt the alphabet boys carry on him. Belief that the great, big federal gummint is gonna serve our interests is really what brought us to this state.

Tue, 03/25/2014 - 08:43 | 4589474 Reaper
Reaper's picture

The interwoven fantasies of trust, a God protected State and the office makes the man.

Tue, 03/25/2014 - 08:36 | 4589443 Budd aka Sidewinder
Budd aka Sidewinder's picture

12333 (and counting) Executive Orders?????

WTF?????

Congress doesn't want oversight , responsibility, ownership of anything other than their re election campaigns.....that way they can't be blamed for anything.....

North Texas is about to re elect two octagenarians to their umpteenth term in Congress....both are nearly senile....one won't be let out at all - but he's a POW like McCain so he gets a pass and the other won't debate his R primary runoff opponent and the media smears said opponent with charges of ageism....stupidest people ever

Tue, 03/25/2014 - 08:18 | 4589389 MickV
MickV's picture

The "United States" ended when Barack Hussein Obama assumed  (he was never sworn in) the Presidency. He is a domestic enemy of the United States as an illegal executor of the laws and commander in chief since he is not a natural born Citizen (one born of US Citizens on US soil--- where no foreign allegiance can exist). He was put in power by foreign NWO interests precisely for that purpose, and is the final solution to yje dissolution of US Citizen sovereignty.

Do you think that the exponential rise in the police state is an accident? Do you think that rule by executive order is an accident? Do you think that the utter impotence of Congress is an accident (it exists now only to hide the treason that it committed by allowing a foreign agent to assume the Presidency). Do you think it's an accident that Cruz Rubio, and Jindal, born of non US Citizen parents, are touted as POTUS and VP candidates (the VP must also be a nbC ---see 11th Amendment). Do you think it is an accident that the press has become a mouthpiece of the Fed. Gov.? Do you think it's an accident that your grandchildren's grandchildren's money is fiven away to oligarchs and foreign entities, w/o a peep from any "regulator". Foreign domestic enemy Usurper Obama is the culmination of 100 years of debasement of the Republic--- the NWO wet dream that Hussein Obama was groomed for.

Wake up. Tell the truth GW, you coward.

Tue, 03/25/2014 - 16:13 | 4591516 11b40
11b40's picture

I guess you only see what you want to.  If you have any reading comprehension at all, you should have picked up on all the mentions of the Bush admninistration's...especially Dickhead Cheney's..involvment in setting all this up.

The United States did not end with the election of Obummer.  It ended when the SCOTUS appointed Bush.

Not that I have any use for either, but let's not play Ostrich here, OK?

Tue, 03/25/2014 - 17:26 | 4591789 MickV
MickV's picture

Never said they were innocent. All of Congress as well as Bush and Cheney are complicit and have committed treason. Now the globalists are setting up for another illegal POTUS or VP with Rubio, Cruz, Jindal and Santorum--- all not eligible and born of foreign parents. It is important to the globalists that there be an illegal administration, why not for you? There is no law, and the law is only what evil men say it is. Look around.

Tue, 03/25/2014 - 15:00 | 4591208 Gadfly
Gadfly's picture

Paranoid racist fool.  Doesn't get it.  Obama is simply an errand boy, sent by grocery clerks, to collect a bill.  A tool.

Tue, 03/25/2014 - 15:18 | 4591290 MickV
MickV's picture

No, you don't get it. An illegal POTUS was installed purposefully, in order to void the Constitution.

Tue, 03/25/2014 - 15:54 | 4591449 Gadfly
Gadfly's picture

If that's true, then he's not the real problem is he?  Who installed him?  Wouldn't "they" be the problem?  The ones with the power to install a U.S. president?

Tue, 03/25/2014 - 17:22 | 4591776 MickV
MickV's picture

The installation resulted in the voidance of the Constitution-- thus there is no law since Obama became President. That's not a problem? Why do you defend an illegal POTUS-- He was put there prcisely because he is ineligible. Get a clue.

Tue, 03/25/2014 - 12:26 | 4590421 Golden Rule
Golden Rule's picture

Not that I disagree with most of what you wrote but our country's decline and presidential treason started with Alexander Hamilton's Charter of the First Bank of the US and has continued throughout history with Teddy Roosevelt, Wilson, Hoover, FDR, Nixon, GHWB, Clinton, GWB, Obama and several others in between. All have been involved in the rape, murder and pillage of our people and country for centuries. 

My hope is there is a special place in Hell for these assholes.

Tue, 03/25/2014 - 08:41 | 4589465 Leraconteur
Leraconteur's picture

 

(he was never sworn in)

 

He was sworn in. It was done a second time (and you don't acknowledge that one either). Nothing is good enough for you. I know your argument, but the fact is that I cannot provide to you MY OWN birth certificate to the details of your satisfaction that you require of Obama, therefore I cannot meet your requirements to be POTUS and my ancestors were here before almost everyone.

Your standard is delusionally high.


Tue, 03/25/2014 - 10:15 | 4589823 Abaco
Abaco's picture

I can produce a birth certificate from the same hospital O claims to have been born in, from a few years earlier, and without all the obvious flaws in the "certificate" he produced. That standard is not delusionally high.  Nor is it unreasonable for a candidate for president to produce credentials when challenged instead of sealing all his records and responding STFU when challenged.

Tue, 03/25/2014 - 20:26 | 4592346 Leraconteur
Leraconteur's picture

I cannot. My township does not have what you want, and therefore this 13th Generation American resident is ineligible based upon your impossible-to-meet standard.

Tue, 03/25/2014 - 11:37 | 4590169 MickV
MickV's picture

Obama never "produced" anything. No member of the media, or any court of law has touched the raised seal which purportedly validifies the document.

A pic on a website is proof of exactly nothing. Can you get a passport at the post office by showing them a pic of your BC on a laptop?

Regardless, the story from his own mouth is that he was born of a foreign father and assumed legally his British citizenship (which he still holds to this day), as such, born of dual allegiance, he is not an eligible natural born Citizen.

Tue, 03/25/2014 - 08:51 | 4589506 MickV
MickV's picture

He was sworn in in private the first time after flubbing the oath, and was made to repeat an affirmation of faith (which voids the oath)--- look it up. The second time was also in private officially.

Tue, 03/25/2014 - 20:27 | 4592349 Leraconteur
Leraconteur's picture

Q.E.D. He could do it 1,000 times but it won't ever be enough for you and your ilk.

Nothing is sufficient for you.

Tue, 03/25/2014 - 08:52 | 4589499 MickV
MickV's picture

Really OBOT. You don't have a birth cert. showing who your parents were and where you were born?

It's a simple requirement--- second generation US Citizen insulated by 2 US Citizen parents (or a US Citizen unmarried mother). It is a simple security requirement designed to ensure the highest possibility of allegiance and attachment to the US. Obviously Hussein Obama is the perfect example of one with littla allegiance and attachment.

All that is needed is boirth to at least naturalized US Citizen parents on US soil.

Ever notice how suceeding generations of those born even of naturalized citizens become more "Americanized"

I gues it's also too much to present ID when voting.

Tue, 03/25/2014 - 20:34 | 4592364 Leraconteur
Leraconteur's picture

My township has a ledger with new births entered as line items entered in ink by hand by the town clerk.

So, no. 

Present ID in person, then they copy this information, create a birth certificate from it, print, emboss, sign and mail it.

My copy is not the original from my birth. The original was lost in a move. So if I were to show you my BC it would be new and not meet your delusional assumptions about aging, wear, paper from that time, type setting (it was printed on an inkjet printer made in 2008! FAKE!!!!!) and all the rest.

If the clerk were to show you 'my long form birth certificate' it would simply be a ledger.

So no, I would not meet your standard.

Wed, 03/26/2014 - 05:56 | 4593076 MickV
MickV's picture

Another straw man. Never said anything about typesetting, ink or aging. One can get a legal copy. Obama doesn't have a legal copy. If it were a legal copy then people would be allowed to see it in person (and I don't mean "factcheck". But yours is the typical OBOT response. I guess it's your shift.

Wed, 03/26/2014 - 07:45 | 4593139 Leraconteur
Leraconteur's picture

One can get a legal copy.

 

Not by your definition. I can only get a photo copy of a ledger line item or a new modern bc that you won't accept based upon you, and others like you, stating that similar qualities in Obama's bc are also signs of invalidity.

It's simple to read your requirements and issues with Obama's bc, realise that my own bc does not meet many of them, and conclude that your standard cannot be met.

Tue, 03/25/2014 - 08:31 | 4589429 d edwards
d edwards's picture

Man, I'm with you on your first sentence, but drop the birther thing-it's a dead end.

 

You've got the right idea about returning to a Constitutional gov't, though.

Tue, 03/25/2014 - 08:43 | 4589476 MickV
MickV's picture

If the executor of the laws is an illegal entity then there is no "law". They know that. Obama has never proven place of birth ( a pic on a website is proof of nothing), regardless, his story of birth to a foreign father excludes him from eligibility.

It is only a deadend because you allow it to be (and many others, shouted down as "birthers", and "racists" by the Alinsyite media). Grow some balls. I have skin in the game as a viable case headed for the SCOTUS next. What will you tell your kids you did when the Republic and their sovereignty was destroyed? Bitch and whine on a blog?

Tue, 03/25/2014 - 20:37 | 4592376 Leraconteur
Leraconteur's picture

 regardless, his story of birth to a foreign father excludes him from eligibility.

 

This is why you guys are full of shit nativists.
My father was born to an Irish Immigrant in New York state. Technically his mother was a foreigner and he was Irish if he declared and thus my Dad (12th Generation American) was ineligble by your standards.

You guys are in illogical-loop-la-la-land. 

Tue, 03/25/2014 - 10:41 | 4589935 usednabused
usednabused's picture

Mick, Thatwoul explain why certain people seem act as if no laws apply to them. Perhaps everyone should recognize the abscense of law and act accordingly.

Tue, 03/25/2014 - 11:29 | 4590136 MickV
MickV's picture

We are not obliged to comply with an illegitimate govt.

Tue, 03/25/2014 - 13:03 | 4590574 Emergency Ward
Emergency Ward's picture

SO STOP COMPLYING ALREADY.......!!

Tue, 03/25/2014 - 08:29 | 4589423 overmedicatedun...
overmedicatedundersexed's picture

mickv still around, still keep'n the faith, your truth is too true for most, but I am impressed you keep it going.

911, twa 800, crash of 08, nothing compared to the illegal alien at 1600 pa ave..hats off to you.

Tue, 03/25/2014 - 09:11 | 4589567 MickV
MickV's picture

Most people cannot conceive of the enormity of what has happened. They have cognitive dissonance, even though the effects and reasons are directly in front of their eyes. The media tells them that what is in front of your eyes is not what you're seeing.

Tue, 03/25/2014 - 12:11 | 4590355 RaceToTheBottom
RaceToTheBottom's picture

ok, so lets assume BO is removed, and then nothing changes.  Will you accept that this has occured before BO and will continue after him?

Your voice is hard to hear you have so many fish hooks hanging off your chin....  Stop playing their game.  The president matters not.

Tue, 03/25/2014 - 15:17 | 4591287 MickV
MickV's picture

Wrong. Lets spell it out. The executor of the laws is illegal--- so how can there be any law?

Tue, 03/25/2014 - 08:37 | 4589450 MickV
MickV's picture

The only way back to the Republic is the "REMOVAL" of Hussein Obama from office--- See the 25th Amendment, 3 US Code 19, and the 12th Amendment (that if the "person serving as POTUS" has an "INABILITY"-- i.e physical, mental or Constitutional disability, that the VP would serve as POTUS "as in the death or other constitutonal disability of the President"---12th Amendment).

Hussein Obama does not need to be impeached. Removal due to "inability" or Constitutional disability is self executing.

Tue, 03/25/2014 - 12:59 | 4590560 Emergency Ward
Emergency Ward's picture

So Biden now or Hillary/Bush in 2016, all indisputably "American", will restore the elusive Republic?  Now I know you are joking, mick.

Tue, 03/25/2014 - 15:21 | 4591298 MickV
MickV's picture

Willful ignorance. So an illegal POTUS is preferred? It doesn't have to be those named after. Total straw man argument.

Tue, 03/25/2014 - 10:26 | 4589876 Bollixed
Bollixed's picture

"President Biden reporting for duty!"

Yea, like that will change the direction we're heading...

Tue, 03/25/2014 - 11:46 | 4590229 MickV
MickV's picture

At least Biden is eligible. As it is now there is no law because the chief executive is illegal.

Tue, 03/25/2014 - 10:17 | 4589837 optimator
optimator's picture

Whenever "They" want they will simply remove him from office, void any laws he ever signed, and while everything is straighted out they will declare martial law, or an enabelling act giving them full power to take care of all the problems. 

Tue, 03/25/2014 - 11:52 | 4590271 MickV
MickV's picture

The only path back to the Republic is the domestic enemy Obama's legal removal (he is like a parasite, a foreign invader). He shall receive no benefit of the "defacto officer doctrine" since he has acted in bad faith, and millions are aware of his usurpation. Therefore anything he ever signed appointed or enacted will be null and void, including the 2 dyke SCOTUS justices.

Imagine the rebuke of the NWO globalists, and the treason charges to come w/in our own govt.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!