• Steve H. Hanke
    05/04/2016 - 08:00
    Authored by Steve H. Hanke of The Johns Hopkins University. Follow him on Twitter @Steve_Hanke. A few weeks ago, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) sprang a surprise. It announced that a...

Wednesday’s Worry – Will Alibaba Destroy The World?

ilene's picture

By Phil Davis of Phil's Stock World

As TS Elliot noted:  "Between the idea and the reality, between the motion and the act falls the shadow."  Whether or not Elliot was referring to "shadow banking" in 1925, 100 years later his words certainly ring true as "Vampire Internet Funds" like Alibaba's Yu'E Bao are draining liquidity out of China's financial system at an alarming rate. 

In less than on year, 81M people have opened Yu'E Bao accounts at an average of $1,000 each, totaling $80Bn of deposits.  Compare that with only 67M investors in China's entire stock market – after 23 years of operation!  Yu'E Bao gives depositors 6% interest and allows the funds to be used at any time, making payments by smart phone or straight withdrawals anywhere in the World vs 0.35% in a Chinese bank, subject to all sorts of restrictions.  

Deposit money draining away from the banks is freaking China out and it won't be long before it starts spreading (because it makes perfect sense for depositors) and suddenly we will end up with either a global liquidity crunch OR banks will have to begin paying fair market rates for deposits, which would also lead to a major crisis as rates rise sharply.

There's already been a run on the Jiangsu Sheyahg Rural Commercial Bank and you can ignore it if you want to – the way you ignored Northern Trust in 2007 or the Icelandic Banks that same year – who cares, right?  It's too far away to affect you, isn't it? Our bankers are far too smart to get caught up in that kind of mess, aren't they?  

Legislators, Bankers, Government Officials and, of course, Billionaires were invited to discuss this issue at the National (rich) People's Congress in Beijing (and let he who has a Congressperson not in the top 10% cast the first stone!) where Chinese Banksters, ironically, called for MORE REGULATION. 

“Now it’s time to step up regulation for the industry’s own good,” Yang Kaisheng, a former president of Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd. and now an adviser to the China Banking Regulatory Commission, said in an interview this month at the National People’s Congress in Beijing. “The emergence of Internet financing is inevitable in China because it serves the grassroots better, but whoever is engaging in financial services, no matter online or off-line, must comply with regulations. If someone stays out of oversight for too long, the chances of it disrupting financial stability will increase significantly.”

The central bank, in its first regulation of Internet financing, on March 14 blocked plans by Alipay and Tencent to offer virtual credit cards and payments using so-called Quick Response codes, citing security risks. The codes are black-and-white squares containing product or company information similar to bar codes that can be read by smartphones.

They're going to lose control of this eventually.  If Ali et al are able to offer credit card terms along with the current payments system, it will be Trillions moving out of banks, not Billions.  World War III won't be America and Russia or China, it's going to be a financial war:

Yu’E Bao and other money-market funds could raise banks’ funding costs by three to five basis points and reduce their profit by 1 percent to 2 percent in 2014, according to Barclays’s Yan. In five to 10 years, they could cut banks’ profit by as much as 17 percent, she wrote.


“Why is all the money going into Yu’E Bao? Because banks fail to pay what savers deserve. You can’t fool them,” Ma Weihua, a former president of China Merchants Bank Co., said during a group discussion at the National People’s Congress. “Yu’E Bao is forcing banks to face up to the challenges of interest-rate deregulation.”


The drain from the banks prompted Niu Wenxin, a managing editor and chief commentator at China Central Television, to attack Yu’E Bao in his blog on Feb. 21, drawing 11.5 million views and sparking nationwide debate.


“Yu’E Bao is a vampire sucking blood out of the banks and a typical financial parasite,” Niu wrote. “It didn’t create value. Instead it makes a profit by pushing up the whole society’s borrowing costs. By passing some teeny-weeny benefit to the public, it makes massive profit for itself and lets the entire society foot the bill.”

In other words "Hey, it's our (Bankster's) job to pay 0.25% on deposits and charge 9% for loans!"  

F them all!  


Your rating: None

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Wed, 03/26/2014 - 20:31 | 4596565 Gadfly
Gadfly's picture

And I thought Americans were gullible and foolish with their money.  

Wed, 03/26/2014 - 19:42 | 4596390 mobydick
mobydick's picture

81m suckers? Instead of screwing Larry King & co, Bernie should have opened up offices accross China. Might even have got a few Princelings to invest a few trillions.

Wed, 03/26/2014 - 19:12 | 4596256 eddiebe
eddiebe's picture

Bankster by any other name....

Wed, 03/26/2014 - 18:48 | 4596133 logicalman
logicalman's picture

If it's all paper and computer digits, then it's not real.

Doesn't matter whether it is government sanctioned or not.

If it can hit the reset button, however, I'm all for it.

Wed, 03/26/2014 - 18:42 | 4596052 stopthejunk1
stopthejunk1's picture

This has got to be a pyramid scheme or similar.

According to the linked ibtimes article, "Up to 90 percent of Yu’e Bao funds are invested in interbank deposits at 29 large banks."

There is simply no way that banks are paying 6% for loans to Alibaba, when they can almost certainly borrow from each other at much lower rates. The interbank rate is much lower. The SHIBOR is at 2.5% for overnight, and 5% for a year, see http://www.shibor.org/shibor/web/html/index_e.html

So the real question is: where is Tianhong getting the money to pay 6% to "depositors"?

I smell a rat.

Wed, 03/26/2014 - 20:27 | 4596553 tom a taxpayer
tom a taxpayer's picture

So the real question is: where is Tianhong getting the money to pay 6% to "depositors"?  

Volume. Like Amazon.com.

Wed, 03/26/2014 - 19:38 | 4596367 kaiserhoff
kaiserhoff's picture

Same as everything else in China, rehypothecation. 

Works until the music stops.

Wed, 03/26/2014 - 19:06 | 4596215 putaipan
putaipan's picture

is this guy related to satoshi? .... if so, i want in!

Wed, 03/26/2014 - 18:26 | 4596021 rsnoble
rsnoble's picture

I need to have a bourbon and clear my head im on fkn overload today.

Wed, 03/26/2014 - 17:34 | 4595772 BeetleBailey
BeetleBailey's picture




also see: CUNT

also see: LYING FUCK

Wed, 03/26/2014 - 18:45 | 4596114 logicalman
logicalman's picture

Please cease insulting Shit Stains, Cunts and Lying Fucks by  associating them with bankers.


Wed, 03/26/2014 - 17:12 | 4595659 ThisIsBob
ThisIsBob's picture

How does Alibaba get the money it needs to pay the 6%?

Wed, 03/26/2014 - 18:11 | 4595936 WhyWait
WhyWait's picture

How could Phil not have asked this question?

80 million Chinese and growing may be waking up some morning soon and asking themselves why they didn't.

Wed, 03/26/2014 - 17:27 | 4595734 madtechnician
madtechnician's picture

He asks his forty thieves to go and steal it

Wed, 03/26/2014 - 17:02 | 4595619 Conax
Conax's picture

It's very illuminating that the Chi-Coms can bank their savings at 6% while we freedom fries can only get .0045.


Wed, 03/26/2014 - 16:55 | 4595588 kurt
kurt's picture

When can I get an account in California? The Fed OWES me FOREGONE INTEREST. I don't think they'll pay me anytime soon. Anybody getting 6% deserves it and if, as a side benefit, it brings down the BANKING sadism cults, great!


Wed, 03/26/2014 - 16:22 | 4595433 Pee Wee
Pee Wee's picture

The world is kicking and screaming to get away from the fraud-finance cartel and Fascist government enablement.

This is the third derivative to replace their "money" in as many years.

Wed, 03/26/2014 - 15:58 | 4595282 TrustWho
TrustWho's picture

In other words "Hey, it's our (Bankster's) job to pay 0.25% on deposits and charge 9% for loans!"  


F them all!......You have my total AGREEMENT!  

Wed, 03/26/2014 - 15:49 | 4595211 ebworthen
ebworthen's picture

"Hey, it's our (Bankster's) job to pay 0.25% on deposits and charge 9% for loans!" 

Yup, all a part of the plan.  Then get retail money to chase yield in stocks, make fees and bonuses, then crash it all and rake more chips off the table, probably get bailed out all over again too.

Lather, rinse, repeat; all with the backing of central banks and politicians.

Wed, 03/26/2014 - 19:31 | 4596334 Oquities
Oquities's picture

smells like GMAC (General Morors Acceptance Corp) Smart Notes to me.

Wed, 03/26/2014 - 19:01 | 4596196 Buck Johnson
Buck Johnson's picture

Exactly, except that China is to big to truly want to fail and I don't think that we can print fast enough to hold that tsunami at bay.

Wed, 03/26/2014 - 16:11 | 4595358 dontgoforit
dontgoforit's picture

Good summation.   Hollow chow mein.


And, that's a lot of Foo Manchu yuan.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!