This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

UK Government Deposit Confiscation Powers Faces Backlash

GoldCore's picture




 

Today’s AM fix was USD 1,299.00, EUR 946.93 and GBP 783.76 per ounce.                                                

Friday’s AM fix was USD 1,293.50, EUR 943.75 and GBP 780.02 per ounce.


Gold climbed $17.20 or 1.34% Friday to $1,303.50/oz. Silver rose $0.10 or 0.5% yesterday to $19.94/oz.   Gold and silver were both up for the week 0.84% and 0.76% respectively.

Gold added to gains on Monday following its biggest one-day jump in over three weeks on Friday, on investor concern after the poor jobs number Friday.


Gold in U.S. Dollars, 1 Year - (Thomson Reuters)


Gold surged 1.3% on Friday - its biggest percentage increase since March 12. Gold is not far from a one-week high of $1,306.50 hit in the previous session.


Iraq's central bank said on Friday its gold reserves had reached 90 tonnes, after buying 60 tonnes over the past two months to support the Iraqi dinar.

Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen said last week that slack in labor markets showed accommodative policies will still be needed for some time which is also bullish for gold.



Gold in U.S. Dollars, 5 Year - (Thomson Reuters)


Silver for immediate delivery declined 0.7% to $19.83 an ounce in London. Platinum fell 0.8% to $1,438.50 an ounce. Palladium lost 0.6% to $786 an ounce. Palladium prices climbed above $800 on March 24, the highest since August 2011, due to concerns about Russian supply. Platinum and palladium had both gained in the previous six sessions.

Gold is 8.2% higher this year, rallying from its 28% fall in 2013 - its biggest annual decline since 1981.


UK Government Powers To Confiscate Deposits Faces Backlash
Last week, we covered the very under reported but important story about how the UK government now has powers to raid banks accounts and confiscate deposits.

On Saturday the
Financial Times covered the story and the fact that the hitherto unnoticed measures are now facing scrutiny and a backlash.

“George Osborne is facing a backlash over plans to give HM Revenue & Customs unprecedented powers to dip into taxpayers’ bank accounts to seize unpaid tax debts,” according to the FT.

MPs, banks and charities want robust safeguards over powers that will allow the Revenue to order banks to pay outstanding debts from taxpayers’ bank accounts, following fears that the measure could be used inappropriately and cause hardship.

Andrew Tyrie, who chairs the Treasury select committee, said the MPs intended to hold further hearings into the new powers, which he said could set a worrying precedent.

Many banks want judicial oversight to apply to the new powers, as they worry about being caught between irate customers and the tax authorities.


“HMRC doesn’t have the best record of getting things right,” a banking source told the FT.

The idea was previously floated in a 2007 consultation, but it was dropped after widespread criticism over the adequacy of the safeguards, the possibility of creating hardship and the risk of HMRC error.

John Thurso, a Liberal Democrat MP on the Treasury select committee, criticised Mr Osborne for slipping the measure out in the Budget in just two paragraphs. “Any advance of powers by the state needs to be resisted unless they can justify it,” he said.

Patrick Stevens, director of tax policy at the Chartered Institute of Taxation, was sceptical that the legislation could be drafted in a way that would apply only to the wealthy. He said: “There are lots of very unsophisticated people out there with more than £5,000 in a bank account. We are truly worried about the vulnerable.”

Robin Williamson, of the Low Incomes Tax Reform Group charity, said he was very concerned about the risk of hardship: “As always the financially savvy ones will find ways around this. The ones that will be caught are the vulnerable.”

“The victims will be people with just enough money to go after but not enough to hire lawyers to fend it off”- said Liberal Democrat MP, John Thurso.


The surreptitious and somewhat underhanded manner in which the legislation was slipped in should give pause for concern. In that way, the measures are similar to the developing
bail-in legislation in the UK which is gradually coming into place without any public debate or informed discussion.

Preparations are being put in place by the international monetary and financial authorities, including the Bank of England for bail-ins. The majority of the public are unaware of these developments, the risks and the ramifications.

Download The Essential Bail-In Guide: Protecting your Savings In The Coming Bail-In Era (11 pages)

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Tue, 04/08/2014 - 01:38 | 4634825 zipit
zipit's picture

Bitcoin users unaffected.

Tue, 04/08/2014 - 00:44 | 4634761 CH1
CH1's picture

Will anyone stop obeying?

If not, the backlash is trivial.

Tue, 04/08/2014 - 00:15 | 4634716 UselessEater
UselessEater's picture

"Preparations are being put in place by the international monetary and financial authorities, including the Bank of England for bail-ins. The majority of the public are unaware of these developments...." and wish to remain so. Even when informed, people just don't care !?!?

Mon, 04/07/2014 - 23:33 | 4634654 NoWayJose
NoWayJose's picture

More likely, the backlash is from banks who fear that customers will simply close accounts rather than leave them in the banks to earn that 0.05% interest...

Tue, 04/08/2014 - 09:04 | 4635195 Fíréan
Fíréan's picture

Bank accounts are required for payment of wages,  banks might  be concerned that wages would extracted from the accounts the same day on which they are paid into the account.. Savings accounts have little incentive already as interest is so low.

Mon, 04/07/2014 - 19:57 | 4634104 Colonel Klink
Colonel Klink's picture

John Thurso, a Liberal Democrat MP on the Treasury select committee, criticised Mr Osborne for slipping the measure out in the Budget in just two paragraphs. “Any advance of powers by the state needs to be resisted unless they can justify it,” he said.

 

They'll always find a way of justifying it eventually. Usually at the end of the barrel of a gun.

Mon, 04/07/2014 - 21:52 | 4634416 Aussiekiwi
Aussiekiwi's picture

The victims will be people with just enough money to go after but not enough to hire lawyers to fend it off”- said Liberal Democrat MP, John Thurso.

Exactly right, sneaky crooked bastards, in any dispute they will take the money first and then say 'well we have the money now you can spends thousands of pounds disputing it if you want, we will be using tax payers money to defend it , no problem.'

Mon, 04/07/2014 - 20:11 | 4634141 logicalman
logicalman's picture

Governments can't exist without the theft called taxation.

Once they exist, the taxation pays for its own enforcement.

Fucking brilliant!

 

Mon, 04/07/2014 - 19:55 | 4634099 KingdomKum
KingdomKum's picture

If you like your shitgum,  you can keep your shitgum  .  .  .

Mon, 04/07/2014 - 21:56 | 4634422 Osmium
Osmium's picture

You didn't build that shitgum.

Mon, 04/07/2014 - 19:36 | 4634044 Doubleguns
Doubleguns's picture

Banks bashing the govt.....are you  kidding me. Who works for who here. 

Mon, 04/07/2014 - 20:26 | 4634190 disabledvet
disabledvet's picture

Well...RBS was nationalized and Scotland wants to declare its independence.

This at the same time Russia is "absorbing" and "annexing."
BNP Paribas about to be nationalized?

DB as well?

Russian Bankers in New York?

I can think of a lot of bad outcomes here.
Well...maybe that last one isn't so bad.
It's hard to tell right now actually...on the one hand we're on the side of Ukraine (I know I am)...on the other hand all the money is Russian and all the "interests" seem that way right now as well.

Is all that "inside information" about to become "outside information"?
All risk as "headline risk" now?

Mon, 04/07/2014 - 23:34 | 4634658 ArkansasAngie
ArkansasAngie's picture

If they can print their own stairway to heaven pray tell why do they need to dip into people's accounts for money.

Is my money worth more than those they print and then force into bank reserves?

Screw'em

Tue, 04/08/2014 - 00:22 | 4634726 TheReplacement
TheReplacement's picture

Independent wealth is their enemy.  Inflation and taxes are your enema.  They want absolute power, destroying what remains of the middle class is the lynchpin. 

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!