You have nothing to worry about. Unless you have clean water, gold, lithium, oil or diamonds. Then you better have nukes stocked up to the tits because everyone else with nukes is gonna bomb your ass to the stone age.
Not necessarily so. Otherwise I'd expect us to be invading Ethiopia, Lithuania, and Serbia any day now. Why not change the number of "recent years" so we can include Bosnia (Operation Joint Endeavor, 1995-1996), Vietnam, Laos, and North Korea to make the data fit even better? Belarus is practically a Soviet... ahem, excuse me, Russian satellite? Let's throw them in for good measure too? The singular conclusion drawn from this map is post hoc reasoning at best.
Simple really. All the light blue places are where the remaining stores of cheap energy are located at a scale to supply the global demand for cheap energy.
Let's consider the case of Pol Pot. Somehow he managed to attach great blame to people who dealt in rather routine goods and services as exploiters. At the same time he seemed to be oblivious to the big bad, intrinsic, intractable OPM problem of government. Where pretty much all incentives are weighted to exploitation. But then I suppose platitudes and theories can eliminate corruption and bias.
Then let's consider that CBs and cartel banks are government. The powers they exercise, the resources they manage are governing, are the commons. Transparency, accountability, legitimacy aren't necessary preconditions to do governing. It is necessary to be under the umbrella of the people with the well organized heavily armed men.
ZeroHeroes, so much fear, so much delusional thinking, so much denial.
It seems the catalyst for war has not been diminished as many people have hoped it would once the world matured. National pride, political agendas, religious and ethnic hatreds are some of the biggest roadblocks to world peace. Often we seem to forget as we look back to World War II and past a dozen "lesser Conflicts" that peace has been the exception rather then the rule for hundreds and thousands of years.
Some people think war is a money making sport. The true reality is that across the world few mothers want to see their children killed and most farmers want to be left along to raise their crops and earn a living. More on the subject of war as a solution to conflict in the article below.
The two maps are the same. The one from the 'official' WTO site doesn't differentiate between states of membership (such as , 'observer, negotiating', and 'observer, non-negotiating').
Regardless - they both essentially make the same point. The armed, non-proxy, conflicts are exclusively in non-member states. Gen. Smedley Butler is spinning in his grave.
You have nothing to worry about.
Unless you have clean water, gold, lithium, oil or diamonds.
Then you better have nukes stocked up to the tits because everyone else with nukes is gonna bomb your ass to the stone age.
this is the stupidest chart .i feel like i just went to dumb knowledge university.
Not necessarily so. Otherwise I'd expect us to be invading Ethiopia, Lithuania, and Serbia any day now. Why not change the number of "recent years" so we can include Bosnia (Operation Joint Endeavor, 1995-1996), Vietnam, Laos, and North Korea to make the data fit even better? Belarus is practically a Soviet... ahem, excuse me, Russian satellite? Let's throw them in for good measure too? The singular conclusion drawn from this map is post hoc reasoning at best.
Laos and Vietnam are escaping...
We need more pivotyness.
Missing some "dots" over near N.Korea, Thailand, and Burma as far as "imposing freedoms" on people.
I'm looking for either a blue or red spot on the American middle class. Where is it?
Simple really. All the light blue places are where the remaining stores of cheap energy are located at a scale to supply the global demand for cheap energy.
Could also have put a red dot on those countries which did not have a central bank before 'liberation' by the West. Strong corelation I'd say.
Hhhmmm....could it be that a banker somewhere is looking at that map and saying to himself..."That would be a good spot for a forward command post."
Let's consider the case of Pol Pot. Somehow he managed to attach great blame to people who dealt in rather routine goods and services as exploiters. At the same time he seemed to be oblivious to the big bad, intrinsic, intractable OPM problem of government. Where pretty much all incentives are weighted to exploitation. But then I suppose platitudes and theories can eliminate corruption and bias.
Then let's consider that CBs and cartel banks are government. The powers they exercise, the resources they manage are governing, are the commons. Transparency, accountability, legitimacy aren't necessary preconditions to do governing. It is necessary to be under the umbrella of the people with the well organized heavily armed men.
ZeroHeroes, so much fear, so much delusional thinking, so much denial.
dup.
Thanks for that disjointed pile of non sequiturs.
Now go back to sleep.
The WTO at the behest of the BIS.
So, ypu do nor think that the US/NATO are belligerent against Syria and North Korea?
join the beast system or die!
smells like freedom-loving democracy-spreading free-marketeers to me.
(disclaimer: this post might be self-radicalized by the internets)
This map clearly shows the NWO in action.
Global domination or bust!
US and them. Its a big club, with a big stick and little tiny scruples... Bitchez
It seems the catalyst for war has not been diminished as many people have hoped it would once the world matured. National pride, political agendas, religious and ethnic hatreds are some of the biggest roadblocks to world peace. Often we seem to forget as we look back to World War II and past a dozen "lesser Conflicts" that peace has been the exception rather then the rule for hundreds and thousands of years.
Some people think war is a money making sport. The true reality is that across the world few mothers want to see their children killed and most farmers want to be left along to raise their crops and earn a living. More on the subject of war as a solution to conflict in the article below.
http://brucewilds.blogspot.com/2014/05/war-and-what-is-it-good-for.html
A 10 year old photo...
you guys should really vet this stuff. here's a link to the official map of wto members:
http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/countries_e/org6_map_e.htm
The two maps are the same. The one from the 'official' WTO site doesn't differentiate between states of membership (such as , 'observer, negotiating', and 'observer, non-negotiating').
Check your facts, and never assume.
Regardless - they both essentially make the same point. The armed, non-proxy, conflicts are exclusively in non-member states. Gen. Smedley Butler is spinning in his grave.
Russia is a member of the WTO (http://wto.wtcmoscow.ru/en/) and in the Taimyr (blue circle in the north of Russia), all is quiet.
Taimyr produces a third of all the palladium on earth.
I thought it was because those places hated the USA for the freedoms the USA used to have before it became a fascist police state!
Carl's Jr.! Your official state-sanctioned supplier of Freedumb Fries!
Hey Smartkknowledge,
Got a map showing BIS (central bank) membership?
Most bizarre photo, EVAR!
I think it's been shopped.