This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

Mainstream Media Discover Ron Paul

testosteronepit's picture




 
By Wolf Richter   www.testosteronepit.com

The Wall Street Journal, NPR, The New York Times, and other mainstream media have engaged in an obvious and silly boycott of presidential candidate Ron Paul. Report after report about the Republican primary excluded him, though occasionally they’d mention his name—to be fair and balanced. For example, the media coverage on October 11 ahead of the GOP debate that evening looked like this:

  • The Wall Street Journal’s front-page article, “Debates Take Candidates for a Bumpy Ride,” didn’t mention Ron Paul.
  • The New York Times’ front-page article, “Five Things to Watch for in the G.O.P. Debate,” mentioned Ron Paul's name at the bottom, in a parenthetical remark that acknowledged his presence.
  • NPR's four-and-a-half minute report covered Sarah Palin's and Chris Christie's exit from the race; Herman Cain's from-the-outside strategy; Mitt Romney's 25% ceiling and his “Mormon problem”; and Rick Perry’s lousy performance during debates. But no mention of Ron Paul.

Ron Paul simply didn’t exist. Maybe the mainstream media were trying to relegate him to oblivion because his anti-Fed and anti-war viewpoints were inconvenient. But even people who weren’t supporters of Ron Paul were outraged: a democracy that wants to be vibrant needs adequate news coverage of major political players. And their outrage lit up the blogosphere, social media, and other outlets.

But a new era has dawned: The New York Times has discovered Ron Paul. Or were the editors afraid that, by sticking to their boycott, they’d have to make do with this headline: "Romney finishes second in Iowa Caucus, Perry Third, and Gingrich Fourth." Which would have been a riot.

Instead: “Paul Moves into Lead in Iowa Forecast,” was today’s headline in the NYT. The article discussed the dynamics in Iowa, where Ron Paul is now expected to beat Romney and demolish Perry and Gingrich. And then the author mused that "...all bets would be off if Mr. Paul won New Hampshire too."

I was stunned to read this in the NYT. And there was one article after another that at least mentioned Ron Paul in some significant way. So I did some counting:

  • December 19:    5 articles (as of noon)
  • December 18:    6 articles
  • December 17:    4 articles
  • December 16:  11 articles

OK, a couple of them were by Paul Krugman who was firing off ineffectual broadsides at Ron Paul. But others were outright positive.

For example, an article today on Gingrich's tax plan paid a compliment to Ron Paul—the Tax Foundation had given Gingrich’s plan a C+ and Ron Paul’s plan a B (Huntsman scored highest with a B+).

But he hasn’t won the mainstream media battle just yet. Yesterday’s article, “G.O.P. Contests Near, and the Pace Picks Up,” discussed the major Republican candidates:

  1. Newt Gingrich—3 paragraphs, 168 words (which ironically included "Mr. Gingrich is leading in polls in Iowa").
  2. Mitt Romney—3 paragraphs, 181 words.
  3. Ron Paul—1 paragraph, 73 words.
  4. Rick Perry—2 paragraphs, 127 words.
  5. Michele Bachman—2 paragraphs, 133 words.
  6. Jon Huntsman—1 paragraph, 94 words.
  7. Rick Santorum—1 paragraph, 41 words.

Of all the contenders, the leader in Iowa, Ron Paul, was given the second smallest piece of verbal real estate. Nevertheless, and unlike before, he was there bright and visible.

But it gets better for Ron Paul: "Paul’s Ground Game,’ in Place Since ’08, Gives Him an Edge” admired the depth, longevity, and effectiveness of his campaign organization in Iowa. And even potential issues came across as oblique praise:

His consistent positions over the years also set him apart from other candidates bedeviled by charges of flip-flopping. But they could also undermine him, as his debate performance Thursday highlighted a rigid antiwar stance out of sync with many Republicans.

After reading it, one wonders if the reporter wasn’t secretly rooting for Ron Paul. And it isn’t just The New York Times. NPR and others have followed. This kind of mainstream media coverage is a huge win for Ron Paul—and for democracy in America.

For the whole debacle of the mainstream media boycott, read.... Where the Heck is Ron Paul?

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Tue, 12/20/2011 - 00:48 | 1996695 Hugh G Rection
Hugh G Rection's picture

Rubio for VP would greenlight the CIA/Mossad sniper teams. Paul needs insurance, Jesse Ventura would be tits. Judge Napo is probably more realistic.

Tue, 12/20/2011 - 03:03 | 1996899 Sunshine n Lollipops
Sunshine n Lollipops's picture

Jesse'd be totally tits. At least make him Chief of Staff.

Tue, 12/20/2011 - 00:58 | 1996729 I Got Worms
I Got Worms's picture

Napolitano for AG!

Tue, 12/20/2011 - 01:40 | 1996820 Fred Hayek
Fred Hayek's picture

With Special Assistant Bill Black.

Mon, 12/19/2011 - 22:40 | 1996348 Mr Lennon Hendrix
Mr Lennon Hendrix's picture

Fuck Huntsman

Mon, 12/19/2011 - 22:44 | 1996354 Freddie
Freddie's picture

Ron Paul is great but Huntsman does suck.  Romney sucks but he is better than huntsman.

Tue, 12/20/2011 - 01:39 | 1996818 Fred Hayek
Fred Hayek's picture

Huntsman's a very odd case. Most of the repubs play the DC game but pretend to be real conservatives. Huntsman actually has a pretty conservative record but runs as a guy who plays the game. Wny, I don't know.

Mon, 12/19/2011 - 22:45 | 1996360 Mr Lennon Hendrix
Mr Lennon Hendrix's picture

Fuck Romney, he is a mormon version of the muslim

;)

Mon, 12/19/2011 - 23:16 | 1996425 Freddie
Freddie's picture

LOL!  As bad as Romney is - he is better than Gingrinch. Newt always wanted to be a CFR/NWO sellout since he was a little tike. 

They let Newt feed at the Fannie and Freddie slush fund trough with Rahm. Gorelnick, Raines, et al.   Newt has to buy his weird looking gold digger mummy her diamons at Tiffany's on credit.  I remember seeing somewhere - the books on Newt's Pac or foundation.  It was a slush fund and suckers donated thinking Newt was a conservative and Constitutionalist. 

Tue, 12/20/2011 - 00:56 | 1996722 ClassicalLib17
ClassicalLib17's picture

Good post, freddie.  A refreshing change of pace.  Merry Christmas and Happy New Year.  Or, happy whatever you muslims celebrate this time of year.  

Mon, 12/19/2011 - 22:50 | 1996376 Vampyroteuthis ...
Vampyroteuthis infernalis's picture

Fuck Romney and Huntsman!!!

Mon, 12/19/2011 - 22:56 | 1996392 Al Gorerhythm
Al Gorerhythm's picture

Now we're getting somewhere.

Mon, 12/19/2011 - 23:06 | 1996403 xtop23
xtop23's picture

Ron Paul / Judge Napolitano 2012 

THAT is a ticket to win.

I would absolutely relish the opportunity to watch the Judge destroy Biden on stage. It would give SNL sketches for years.

Tue, 12/20/2011 - 00:44 | 1996679 Hugh G Rection
Hugh G Rection's picture

Two guys that understand and respect the constitution....that's not fair. Its tradition to have at least one retard on the ticket.

Tue, 12/20/2011 - 01:45 | 1996831 Libertarian777
Libertarian777's picture

there are still 400+ retards in CONgress... lets not appoint any retards into the Paul administration.

Mon, 12/19/2011 - 22:24 | 1996310 philipat
philipat's picture

Anyone on Faux Noise who even mentions "He who cannot be named" is forced to go back and wash out the mouth with soap and water. Common link to MSM, of course, is Murdick.

Mon, 12/19/2011 - 22:41 | 1996351 Freddie
Freddie's picture

You are a moron if you think any of the networks are different.  Only morons who support the oligarchs and enjoy being serfs watch TV.  You must be one.  Dumb fkkk.

Mon, 12/19/2011 - 22:55 | 1996388 Al Gorerhythm
Al Gorerhythm's picture

I believe you misread the intent of his post, Freddie.

Mon, 12/19/2011 - 23:01 | 1996397 philipat
philipat's picture

"I believe you misread the intent of his post, Freddie."

Thanks Al, I think Freddie is on the Scottish Koolaid?

Mon, 12/19/2011 - 22:22 | 1996304 israhole
israhole's picture

Who cares about MSM anyway?  Lyin sacks-a-shit.

Mon, 12/19/2011 - 21:49 | 1996243 hawks5999
hawks5999's picture

Cue the mainstream media's claims he's a racist in 3... 2... 1...

Mon, 12/19/2011 - 22:33 | 1996319 FEDbuster
FEDbuster's picture

Too late, Sean Hannity already drug that dead dog out of the closet before the FOX debate.  Spent about twenty minutes on his radio show talking about the newsletters from the 80's.  Something about riots ending when welfare checks needed to be picked up?  Wasn't written by Ron Paul, but was in a newsletter with his name on it.

Rush said because the RNC is too soft by backing cream puffs like Romney and Gingrich in the race, it allows wackos like Ron Paul to take the lead.  RP's foreign policy is crazy, his conspiracy theories, etc... make him unelectable.  Rush went on and on about Paul being "left" of Obama on Iran.

With "conservative" talk show hosts like these, who needs MSNBC?

 

Mon, 12/19/2011 - 23:17 | 1996426 centerline
centerline's picture

Hannity is just entertainment.  Same for Rush and so many others.  The worst sort as well.  Not worth listenting too.  Those who do deserve to be mislead.  Sad.  These shrills just feed on the fear, frustration and anger for the sake of thier own fame and fortune.  If they gave a damn, there would be intelligent discourse and debate.  Rather it is just a exercise in bully tactics and confirmation.

NPR losts it place on my radio presets as well.  Ever since the economy tanked it is clear they got thier purse strings yanked by someone with an aggenda.

 

Mon, 12/19/2011 - 23:30 | 1996460 Freddie
Freddie's picture

All TV is sh*t.  It is for morons who want to keep our overlords in power.  TV HD for serf morons.  This includes CNBC, Bloomberg and FBN. Russia Today is closer to the truth.

The only thing worse for even bigger retards is sports talk radio.   

Radio is just as bad except - Beck has been a supporter of Ron Paul.  Savage and Rush have been attacking Paul.  F Em.! F em all and Hollywood.

Mon, 12/19/2011 - 23:54 | 1996523 FEDbuster
FEDbuster's picture

Glenn Beck supports Bachmann first and Santorum second.  He is so into Israel now, that he doesn't give a fuck about the United States.  I don't know why he doesn't convert from LDS to Jew for Jesus?  Fuck Beck.  He is a goofball NEO CON asshat.

Tue, 12/20/2011 - 00:36 | 1996651 Hugh G Rection
Hugh G Rection's picture

I'll give Beckerhead props for helping me discover truth. The problem with his controlled dissent, once you realize the 9/11 lie, and notice how much he demonizes truthers... you realize he is full of shit.

On second thought, no props for Beckedict Arnold. He is a Zionist whore, disingenuous alcoholic that joined a religion so he could bang a cute blonde.

Mon, 12/19/2011 - 23:25 | 1996445 kridkrid
kridkrid's picture

No!  They are not entertainment, they are propagandists.  It amazes me to listen to their talking point regurgitated by so many.  They shape perception and therefore our reality. About 10 years ago I lost my mother to those whack jobs.  My mother was primarily apolitical her entire life.  When she voted, it was mostly to cancel out my father's vote.  She believes Sean Hannity.

Tue, 12/20/2011 - 00:17 | 1996588 DaveyJones
DaveyJones's picture

hard to believe a drug addict like Rush would have a problem with reality. Sean, I think, needs more drugs 

Mon, 12/19/2011 - 23:53 | 1996529 r00t61
r00t61's picture

I don't know about Hannity, but Rush has gone on record, in print and on his radio show, stating that he is first and foremost "an entertainer."  He does what he does for the money, AND he's honest about it. I don't agree with any of Rush's positions but at least he's honest about his desire for money.  Unlike, say, politicians, who talk disingenuously about things like "public service" and "patriotism."

 

That people somehow take Rush's "entertaining" commentary and twist it into their political raison d'etre says more about his audience than it does about Rush.

Tue, 12/20/2011 - 01:01 | 1996537 FEDbuster
FEDbuster's picture

He is become more of a verbal ipatac, he makes me puke.  Fuck Rush.

Here is Rush bashing Ron Paul back in August:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Ah1Jzd9H_Q&feature=related

Mon, 12/19/2011 - 22:52 | 1996382 kridkrid
kridkrid's picture

I'm not sure why someone would down vote your post.  What you've written is spot on factual.  I'm in my car a decent bit... listen to the conservative talk shows so I know the meme.  What you say is exactly what happened.  Add a couple of screened callers to parrot back the talking points and it's a wrap. 

Time to break out of the carefully constructed box, stupid electorate (both sides).

Mon, 12/19/2011 - 22:40 | 1996346 Hugh G Rection
Hugh G Rection's picture

I used to watch Hannity daily in my neocon days.  Now I'd like to waterboard him with buckets of diarrhea.

Mon, 12/19/2011 - 22:46 | 1996363 Freddie
Freddie's picture

All of TV is shit and it is for serfs who support the regime by watching.  I am done with Limbaugh.  Hannity's radio show is a joke and he always has Newt on and Democrats plus Dick Morris who hates Ron Paul.  F em.  Turn it off. Turn the lies and brainwashing crap off.

Tue, 12/20/2011 - 00:07 | 1996561 IAmNotMark
IAmNotMark's picture

Diners, Drive-ins, and Dives is pretty good food porn (mmmmm....that's a mighty fine burger there boy!)

Other than that...tv is shit

Mon, 12/19/2011 - 22:57 | 1996389 Hugh G Rection
Hugh G Rection's picture

Dick "book plugger" Morris is a whore, and a perfect guest on chicken hawk Hannitys propaganda hour. I still have a couple of Hannitys books layin
g around, need to burn them in effigy, or maybe i'll take em to the range and post the finished product here...

Mon, 12/19/2011 - 23:48 | 1996510 israhole
israhole's picture

At first glance I thought you said "Dick 'butt plugger' Morris".

Tue, 12/20/2011 - 00:39 | 1996662 Hugh G Rection
Hugh G Rection's picture

If it sells books he's in

Mon, 12/19/2011 - 23:15 | 1996418 AssFire
AssFire's picture

Yes Hannity, the Ron Paul assassin... hated in my house since 2007...Morris, the book pusher lets not forget Rove the biggest ahole of them all.. Yes, I am an equal opportunity hater folks...

Mon, 12/19/2011 - 23:21 | 1996434 Freddie
Freddie's picture

Conservatives beat up on Santorum for backing that horrible piece of s*it Arlen Specter.  The truth is Bush and Rove twisted Santorum's arm.  Rove pushed Bush to go for amnesty.  Rove is a vile piece of crap. 

The GOP needs zillions more like Ron and Rand Paul.  Filled with RINo sh*t like McCain, Graham-nesty, open-borders Rubio, Kyl, and the list goes on.  The Senate is filled with the worst crap in the entire country.  Reid, Boxer, Feinstein, Patty Murray - the list is endless.

Tue, 12/20/2011 - 01:15 | 1996765 ClassicalLib17
ClassicalLib17's picture

Not trolling Fred, but you're on a positive roll tonight.  If you want to do some biting commentary on republican politics, look at the Illinois republican party.  We elected some dipshit with a questionable background named Mark Steven Kirk.  His background is well known in the party, but unspoken .  Our party is heavily influenced by the log cabin republicans.  Big Jim Thompson, Dennis Hastert, etc.  In my county, a former party chair was busted for kiddie porn.  This shit just wears me out.  Ron Paul 2012 

Mon, 12/19/2011 - 22:23 | 1996302 navy62802
navy62802's picture

Already saw a couple of articles just today dragging up the old controversy about the newsletters. In fact, one is posted over in the opinion section of Bloomberg right now.

Mon, 12/19/2011 - 23:30 | 1996450 akak
akak's picture

It's bad enough to beat a dead horse, but vastly more pathetic to mercilessly and mindlessly pound that dead horse into atoms.

When asked again about this red herring of those stupid fucking newsletters, RP should just give the stock answer "I have already fully addressed this issue on dozens of occasions --- NOW, can we talk about some REAL issues?"

Mon, 12/19/2011 - 22:11 | 1996236 Al Gorerhythm
Al Gorerhythm's picture

An alien has landed on the White House Lawn!

Semi-factual reporting! What's the world coming to?

Tue, 12/20/2011 - 02:37 | 1996882 RmcAZ
RmcAZ's picture

The anti-Ron-Paul bubble is bursting.

Mon, 12/19/2011 - 22:44 | 1996357 Mr Lennon Hendrix
Mr Lennon Hendrix's picture

I think by not mentioning him the MSM peaked America's curiosity.

Tue, 12/20/2011 - 15:20 | 1998451 keepusfree
keepusfree's picture

I agree with Mr. Lennon and wrote about this here in an article titled "Ron Paul Starts Mainstream Media Tsunami" :-) http://thereaganwing.wordpress.com/2011/12/20/ron-paul-starts-mainstream...

Mon, 12/19/2011 - 23:26 | 1996447 centerline
centerline's picture

What is most odd is the parade of idiots.  I mean Newt of all people?  Come on now.  My dog even finds that one funny. 

Just like Perry and Cain and Romney.  They were all failures from the beginning.

The whole freakshow has been staged so far.   So, what's up with that?  

Mon, 12/19/2011 - 23:34 | 1996474 john39
john39's picture

All totally insane except for one guy. The media obviously ignores him forever. After the others are all totally shown to be flakes, the spotlight shifts to the credible sane wise older gentleman. Anyone else feel like its just another staged production, regardless of whether PR knows it? If so, you have to wonder, what are we being sold?

Mon, 12/19/2011 - 23:40 | 1996489 centerline
centerline's picture

Precisely.  Sold.  Or distracted, split. Who knows.  But it is staged.  The media blackout on RP so clearly demonstrated the centralized control of the MSM, there isn't any question in my mind.

Tue, 12/20/2011 - 01:47 | 1996836 Xanadu_doo
Xanadu_doo's picture

I have a very real and growing fear that Jeb Bush is going to ride in at the last moment to rescue the grand old partay from going a direction that could actually save this system before they milk all of our wealth.

 

Man, we are so screwed unless RP can pull this off.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!