Gold And The Potential Dollar Endgame Part 3: Backwardation And Gold
Authored by Joe Yasinski and Dan Flynn of Gold Bullion International,
In part one of our series we discussed stock to flow dynamics and their impact on the gold price. To briefly refresh, the stock to flow ratio is simply what percentage of the total stock (all the gold ever mined) is available for sale and this ratio is what determines gold’s price. This is the only relevant ratio when determining gold’s supply. Most analysts myopically stare at mining and scrap supply, yet these are a mere afterthought compared to the existing, and readily saleable gold already spread throughout humanity. The greater the “flow” the greater gold’s availability for purchase and ostensibly, the lower the price and vice versa. In part two of our series we discussed how “paper gold” meaning ETF’s, futures and various derivatives simulate flow where none actually exists. It is our contention that the very existence of this paper flow, rather than metal flow, gives the false impression that there is much more metal available for sale than there actually is. This by definition makes the stock to flow ratio appear to be much lower (more gold available for sale) than actually is and therefore suppresses the price. In the final segment of this series we want to explore an important signal that could identify the demise of paper gold and/or signal a loss of confidence in the $US Dollar and cause an abrupt increase in the stock to flow ratio and the physical gold price.
Before we delve into why backwardation in gold has some very unique and stark implications, let’s first take a moment to understand exactly what backwardation is. While we are at it, we’ll define backwardations mirror twin, contango. Let’s start with contango, since it seems to be the natural state of most commodities not in extremely short supply. The easiest way to visualize contango is to visualize a standard upward sloping yield curve where yield rises as maturity extends. Now visualize the same upward sloping graph but this time representing the price of any particular commodity for delivery out in time. There is first the “spot” price which represents the price paid for any commodity immediately. The farther out you want delivery of your commodity while locking in the price, the higher the cost to do so. Typically, this increase in costs represents a variety of factors of varying influence such as storage costs, time value of money (opportunity cost) etc.
The mirror image of contango is the real subject of this article, and this is called backwardation. Backwardation is the condition where the spot price is higher than the forward price. Backwardation often exists in perishable commodities, right before the harvest. This happens because even though demand is constant throughout the year for a commodity like wheat, the harvest only happens once a year. If you demand delivery right before the harvest, it will be more expensive than taking delivery one month later, after all the grain silos are full. Backwardation is usually a fleeting phenomenon, occurring only when a particular commodity is in short supply and there is great demand for immediate delivery, not in the future.
As discussed in parts 1 and 2 of this series, gold is a unique commodity in that it is not consumed. Gold is certainly not in short supply. Essentially every ounce mined since the dawn of man is scattered around civilization in governmental and private hands. Gold isn’t consumed, it’s hoarded. Estimates of world gold supplies are north of 170,000 tons. So what would backwardation mean in the gold market? If the gold market ever entered backwardation it would offer a seemingly risk free profit opportunity for an arbitrageur. One so inclined would simply sell their gold in the spot market, as it would demand the highest price, and then simultaneously buy a futures contract at a lower price for delivery at a future date. Logically, in an efficient and functioning market enough people would “sell spot gold” and “buy future gold” that the spot price would go down, future prices would go up and the backwardation would disappear. That’s how markets are supposed to work, they take advantage of risk free profits and they disappear. So if and when we see gold in backwardation, it should be considered something like a fire alarm for the system. Something serious is happening. Investors would be rejecting what should be a “risk free” profit opportunity. We would like to suggest two (not mutually exclusive) causes: 1) the threat of counterparty failure and/or 2) loss of confidence in the $US Dollar.
The first implication of gold in backwardation is straightforward and easy to understand. The market is pricing in significant counterparty risk of failure to deliver gold in the future. The paper gold market is highly leveraged and functions as long as participants have confidence in the ability of counterparties to deliver on their contractual obligations. It is interesting to note that the gold market has experienced brief periods of backwardation dating back to the mid-1990s. It is easy to identify the factors of market stress that caused those incidents of gold backwardation in the first place. Several academics as wells as gold analysts and commentators have pointed to these events. Of the several periods of backwardation in the gold market, two of the most interesting and significant followed the September, 1999 Central Bank “Washington Agreement” on Gold and more recently during the dark days of the 2008 financial crisis. In both instances we believe the primary force causing gold backwardation was near catastrophic collapse in counterparty viability.
The Washington Agreement (European Central Bank , 1999) was announced on September 26, 1999 by 15 European Central Banks. As summarized by the World Gold Council, “… they stated that gold would remain an important element of global monetary reserves, and agreed to limit their collective sales to 2,000 tonnes over the following five years, or around 400 tonnes a year. They also announced that their lending and use of derivatives would not increase over the same five-year period. The signatory banks later stated that the total amount of their gold they had out on lease in September 1999 was 2,119.32 tonnes. (World Gold Council, 2013). There is strong anecdotal evidence (VtC, 2012) that for the decade prior or longer, Central Banks had been the primary suppliers of gold and therefore served as a backstop to the rapidly expanding paper gold market. Based on the market reaction immediately following the WAG, the evidence is even more compelling. Given that the signatories of the WAG controlled approximately 45% of global gold reserves, it’s not surprising that in announcing a formal reduction of supply/flow into the market, the price of gold to exploded higher. Real supply was constrained impacting the STF ratio. Further, leveraged paper gold participants scrambled as they realized the previous implied Central Bank backing was going away. Counterparty Risk became real and gold went into backwardation. A large holder of paper gold had to question whether or not his counterparty (bullion bank) would really be able to deliver without official support. What would have previously offered a “risk free” arbitrage opportunity was now a rapidly unwinding collapse. There is wide speculation and some documentation that the panic was not contained until the US (who did not sign the WAG) and the UK stepped forward to supply the market with the needed physical gold to meet the run:
“In front of 3 witnesses, Bank of England Governor Eddie George spoke to Nicholas J. Morrell (CEO of Lonmin Plc) after the Washington Agreement gold price explosion in Sept/Oct 1999: George said "We looked into the abyss if the gold price rose further. A further rise would have taken down one or several trading houses, which might have taken down all the rest in their wake. Therefore at any price, at any cost, the central banks had to quell the gold price, manage it. It was very difficult to get the gold price under control but we have now succeeded. The US Fed was very active in getting the gold price down. So was the U.K." (GATA, 2003)
Now fast forward to the dark days of the 2008 financial crisis. After the September 15, 2008 collapse of Lehman Brothers, a daisy chain of bank defaults seemed inevitable. As paper gold is only as good as the bullion bank selling it, it’s no surprise that again the gold market went into backwardation. This time, however, the price of (paper) gold was not rising. It was falling – and falling fast. During October and November of 2008, the price of gold fell by 20%. Is it possible that this falling gold price was signaling something deeper than potential bank failure? (FOFOA, 2013) We think it is certainly possible, and believe the second implication for gold backwardation is a collapse in confidence in the $US Dollar itself. As pointed out in an April 2011 interview with legendary gold, currency, and commodity investor Jim Sinclair, the Lehman collapse changed the game forever and may have set the stage for the final act in US Dollar hegemony:
“Before the failure of Lehman Brothers, OTC derivatives losses would have almost netted out to zero. You can consider derivatives like a string in a circle with various knots representing all the derivatives transactions. When Lehman went broke, the string broke. When Lehman couldn’t meet its obligations on derivatives, they could no longer be netted out to zero. That’s why the banks went down, and that’s why you had the government bailouts and quantitative easing.” (Sinclair, 2011)
Given the nature of today’s gold market with paper dominating physical flow, it makes sense to us that backwardation driven by a failing $US Dollar could initially coincide with a rapidly falling price of gold. Although this statement may seem counterintuitive, it is important to remember what we discussed in part 2 of this series. The paper gold market dwarfs the physical gold market in size, perhaps 15 or 20 to 1. Today, there is no meaningful separation in the price of physical gold and paper gold. Because paper gold supplies the marginal flow in the gold market, it sets the price. And consider for a moment Exter’s Pyramid:
If true that Lehman was the tipping point that put the global financial system on the brink, a rational response on the part of a paper gold holder (a derivative/financial contract) is not to wait and hope for an allocation or delivery of physical. Instead, the response is to sell immediately and move lower on the inverted pyramid. From central banks to individual savers, we see this happening every day. As the price of paper gold (and physical as there was no Comex/LBMA collapse) fell, real estate, corporate and muni bonds, and stocks fell. Even if the endgame is a dollar collapse, we would expect to first see a rally in US Treasuries and demand for cash, which we did. Further, towards the inverted apex of the pyramid there is ample anecdotal evidence that premiums on physical gold had begun to widen and in some local markets there was very tight supply – so perhaps we were witnessing what many physical gold advocates have been suggesting would ultimately occur. We believe that there were some interesting differences between the gold backwardation of 1999 and 2008.
Academics such as Professor Antal Fekete made a call for the imminent demise of the international monetary system. (Fekete, 2008) and based on his studies of the gold basis believed that gold was entering permanent backwardation. So what would extended or permanent backwardation imply? According to Prof Antal Fekete, “gold going into permanent backwardation means that gold is no longer for sale at any price, whether it is quoted in dollars, yens, euros, or Swiss francs. The situation is exactly the same as is has been for years: gold is not for sale at any price quoted in Zimbabwe currency, however high the quote is. To put it differently, all offers to sell gold are being withdrawn, whether it concerns newly mined gold, scrap gold, bullion or coined gold.”
Dollars would be bidding for gold, but gold simply wouldn’t be accepting dollar bids. This would imply a gold price of zero or infinity, take your pick. Since physical gold would no longer be convertible into dollars.
But as we know, 2009 brought a massive effort on the part of Central Banks and Governments the world over in order to restore confidence in the system. Only through this massive intervention were the markets able to steady themselves. Although damaged, things on the surface seemed to recover and Fekete’s and others calls for $US Dollar collapse seemed premature at best. It seemed that backwardation had subsided.
Today, we encounter investors and speculators that believe many of the issues facing the markets in 2008 have been resolved. To the extent that they have a position in gold, it tends to be a trade with paper gold. Some believe that they will be able to look at various metrics measuring the level of stress in the gold market or even backwardation and “know” when it is time to move to physical. Whether it is evaluating swaps, gold leases, or various versions of calculating the gold basis – they all have their crystal balls. One way of monitoring this is what’s called the GOFO (Gold Forward Offer Rate.) The GOFO rate is defined by the London Bullion Metal Association (LBMA) as… “Gold Forward Offered Rate - these are rates at which contributors are prepared to lend gold on a swap against US Dollars.”
In layman’s terms, the GOFO is the rate someone will loan you dollars on gold collateral. The GOFO rate will be lower than the rate of an uncollaterized loan and should always be positive, meaning costs more to borrow US Dollars than it does gold. If this rate were to ever go negative it would mean that gold is more precious than dollars. Essentially gold would be removing its bid for dollars. For physical gold owners searching for clues to tightness and demand in the physical market, they would be wise to keep a sharp eye on these metrics. It is our belief that this is happening, right now. Money is moving down Exter’s pyramid and while the final denouement may be days, weeks, months or years off, we are certain it would be preferable to be years early as opposed to a day late.
What do you view as a risk-free asset? The US Dollar? If the next global financial fire is coming, how confident are you that your alarm is working?
(49 votes)
- advertisements -
»
- 41259 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
Similar Articles You Might Enjoy:
- Gold And The Potential Dollar Endgame Part 2: Paper Gold, What Is It Good For?
- Guest Post: GLD And SLV: Disclosure In The Precious Metals Puzzle Palace
- Gold And Silver Ownership And Prices Not Be Affected By Dodd-Frank Legislation On July 15
- Gold And The Potential Dollar Endgame Part 1
- LCH.Clearnet Accepts ‘Loco London’ Gold As Collateral Next Tuesday
Or my distant cousins the Pietzrkowski's (true: from Osie, Polska)?
I would agree. In fact they don't really belong at all. As far as I know, John Exter's orginal pyramid referred only to the paper currencies, debt, financial instruments, etc. that were created on the back of gold.
Central banks are trying to restore faith in a structurally doomed system. Faith was important to get here, but now that we are here faith is irrelevant. The ponzi of growth is drawing to a close, and there will be amazing and possibly violent events occurring in the immediate future as a consequence. This recent PM smash is nothing more than TPTB trying to tie up a few loose strings as a matter of bolstering faith. To some of us, this is a gift. To most, there will be only loss as more and more promises go unfulfilled.
where does one find the current GOFO?
http://www.lbma.org.uk/pages/index.cfm?page_id=55&show=2013
Nice explanation....thanks gentlemen
Where government manipulation is, risk free assets are not.............
Great read.
However, i shall utter the fatal phrase "this time its different"
I do not believe that treasuries will receive a bid from foreign capital at all, perhaps domestic capital but we will see no move into treasuries like last time. Foreign capital will move to Non US markets in the form of their heavily depreciated stock markets, the more viable currencies and bond markets and of course... Hard assets!
I just feel everything that is currently getting a beating and is unwanted (or so price suggests) will become the new desirable, it’s that simple
So US TSY USD SPX all of the pumped assets will be dumped.. and all of the currently dumped assets will get pumped.
Since when does ZH post ads from dealers. The middle class is working: that's all you need to know about gold.
The middle class is working?
Where, in the mines of Moria?
PM Field Report from the Pacific NW: I just spent some time at a preferred local PM & coin shop, and was dismayed that for the 1st time ever they well almost all out of gold and completely out of silver. Like several other parties, I had to place an order for the 2nd shipment of next week, as the price drops are bringing out the PM buyers in numbers and the 1st shipment is already pre-sold.
The two "well-dressed guys" that walked out as I walked in, were "banking & investment" types -- as my trusted salesman of zee Precious told me. One was a highly placed banker at a downtown bank (J_M), and the other a fund mgr. They were slap-happy about their chance to BTFD. Wouldn't say how much Ag they pre-ordered or how much of the fast-shrinking Au they bought.
While I was there, two East Indian guys were busy ordering 'sizable' orders of AG. A pair of blue-collar Anglo women (mother & daughter?) also ordered >100 oz.
IMO, TPTB are slowly getting "between a rock and a hard place": Let the market dictate the PM price and 'up she goes' and threatens the USD. Surpress it too much and out come the bullion crowd that is either switching paper-PM for hard-PM or the Joe-Shmoes who are trading their FRNs for bullion & coins -- thus drying up the market for bullion.
Like the movie says "Something's Gotta Give", and (per Shakespeare) "we all have our part to play".
The best time to buy was yesterday (and before). Today is OK if you have not bought. Tomorrow MAY be OK, unless they run out.
Good reporting, + 1
I'm voting with Gold and Silver I physically hold.
I have no trust in equities, 401K's, IRA's, SS, or even my local bank (binary digits vaporizable in a nanosecond).
I do hold some cash physically as well.
NO TRUST.
Holding at least some CA$H is very smart. In a "grid down" SHTF, cash is the only thing that will work at first.
Pistols-- pistols will still work.
Yessa ....Gold bitches......
Something that is entirely missed is that gold is essentially an illiquid market, in terms of bullion, not I.O.U.s. Should backwardation occur, then what was formerly an illquid market will suddenly become liquid in terms of bullion, meaning leverage comes into play.
The amount of leverage in the system is astronomical. Were it to suddenly feed into a gold backwardation, then prices would obtain the full force of the gale in derivatives.
The USA is a great nation, perhaps the greatest yet seen. Gold (Au) is a willful element. The perfect should not be made the enemy of the good. People should be the master of money, not vice versa. Law could be mankind's greatest achievement. If the USA would behave lawfully Au would not punish it. PROSECUTE YOUR WAR WAR CRIMINALS USA or suffer the consequences.
"The USA is a great nation, perhaps the greatest yet seen."
Right... Please educate yourself.
Here's a few blogs that you have obviously never read:
http://endoftheamericandream.com/
http://www.testosteronepit.com/
http://www.shtfplan.com/
http://www.zerohedge.com/
I have followed Acidtest Dummy's comments for a while now, and find them insightful. Read his comment again, more thoroughly.
I am always glad to come back to the USA, but fear its slip towards tyranny. That is why I like some guys like him, Freddie and Monedas (however popular or not), because of truthiness or insights, or both!
I respect your comments DoChen. I did read the whole thing, and I was only commenting on what I quoted. If I also disagreed with the rest, I would have said so - surely you've noticed by now that I'm not shy about speaking on everything that I have a problem with. So anyway, I agree with you, but that doesn't mean I'm going to make any kind of retraction ;)
10-4!
As I respect yours.
Define Great
I defined the USA, instead, as a "great nation." And, I encourage the USA to do the right thing by adding "perhaps the greatest yet seen." I am neither a patriot or a nationalist (e.g. I think that China is a VERY great nation, as they have been practicing being civilized since before God raped Mary.) So remember, ALL language is political. And a tree is best measured when it is down.
So if faint praise is the best I can muster for the USA -- you will have to get over it.
Great? Megapuke. Great big COMMUNIST dictatorship; ok I can buy that description, but not an open-ended "great". RED [aka Edomite-controlled] China is the model for the "New World Order" folks. Ignoring or ridiculing this fact makes it no less true.
china? they be nothing but an extension of nippon and that hooligan reagens dream of a galt world. verily china be geographically impotent to challenge in military might. germany if allowed to get their hands on russia' vast natural resources and cheap labor be much worrisome. battle ground poland is now covert op tent city. in conclusion the precious and it's lessor cousin gold will soon be on sale.
This is how I see USA today, find and replace "bank" with "USA":
""No, you’re wrong there—quite wrong there. The bank is something else than men. It happens that every man in a bank hates what the bank does, and yet the bank does it. The bank is something more than men, I tell you. It’s the monster. Men made it, but they can’t control it.”
? John Steinbeck, The Grapes of Wrath"
One of my employees got back from a 2 week marketing trip to Russia, and her hotel room only bill was over $350 per day in Moscow with no frills for a small mediocre room. Quitely Russia is holding its own in many ways. It still has corruption, complexity, but with the right contacts there are opportunities outside of the US. Learning how to work correctly with currency controls in other countries will help if they start implimenting them in the US.
I hear you, and green you, but I will take PERU over Russia any day of the week (and already have).
this another reason why war with east asia is imminent. china may already have the critical mass of gold it needs to take down the west. they, alone, have the means and the motive to take down the virtual gold market and blow up the dollar(along with 310 mil americans). maersk just reported western trade has just about collapsed but eastern trade is still strong. has asia reached the point where dependence upon the west is like what windshield washer fluid is to a car, nice to have on dirty wet roads but not essential to the operation of the car? china now has exclusive yuan/ruble trade with russia, iran takes yuan, all of the asean nations are in some stage of currency negotiations with the yuan and the japan issue may be all about the role of the yuan/yen exchange(it is certainly about usa pacific influence).
get ready to que mr. morrison. the end.
Our friends in the City of London (corporation) seem to be maneuvering.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/02/22/us-britain-china-swap-idUSBRE91L0BO20130222
They have to use the market indexes to create the 1 1/2 - 2% GDP. Gold won't do it.
they'll never touch my gold member...
Is that you Willie Peter Johnson?
goldfingered ?
and yet the price is continually held down, all day, every day. If I had a nickel for every time someone like Andrew McGuire said the market was about to collapse because of physical demand I'd be rich - big time rich.
I'm all-in phyzz, but I don't think any collapse is coming until the USD loses reserve status. The sooner, the better. I'm sick of these fucking criminals in the paper markets.
Good read, I think.
If you think then you exist!
Love the seeming AMAZEMENT of $24.00 prems on Gold in Asia...............hell, I wish I could buy 1oz old coins for $24.00 over spot!.
Even refiners are paying premiums on .9999 gold coins today.
What I'm getting from this article is the idea since most "gold trading" is paper, rather than physical, then lack of confidence is paper will thwart the price of physical?
Seems to me there's quite a divergence, especially if "paper" instruments are struggling to acquire physical.
Seems to me there's quite a divergence, especially if "paper" instruments are struggling to acquire physical.
Paper instuments are not used by anyone but an idiot that actually thinks they have a physical claim on delivery.
I have NEVER read any policy on any Gold/Silver ETF, that if you dug deep enough, you find a clause that tells you JUST that.(PHYS/PSLV being the only exception I know of).
Paper is used for speculation, and profit taking.
You cannot take the futures' markets seriously any more. Too much 'fun and games' they are not real markets.
In 2009 there were open expiring contracts in ag commodities that would have ordinarily arbed but were left open. Nobody knew why, nobody jumped on them b/c nobody could explain what was going on and if there were unknown risks.
Gold backwardization is similar. Who knows? Nobody is making the spot-futures contract arb otherwise there would be no backwardization! Right?
Loss of confidence in the dollar? If someone holds dollars they have confidence in them, ipso facto. If they don't hold dollars who cares what sort of confidence they have? Dollar holding like every other kind of holding is self-regulating. Nobody holds dollars unless they want to: one can always choose to hold a collectible ... or genteel poverty. As it is, the dollar is convenient. Until something comes along that is more convenient ... or convenience itself becomes irrelevant there will be a place for dollars.
Keep in mind, priced in crude oil, dollars have real worth ... this is reinfrorced in gas station around the world millions of times per day.
Gold and robots. Robots have and will continue to eliminate millions of good paying jobs all over the world while the population grows. So central banks steps in and fund the entitlement deficits with trillions of dollars. But the funding does not go into hard capital assets creating jobs. Rather it largely goes to the growing number of people who have lost jobs, benefits and medical coverage. The mega cycle of more robots, fewer jobs is continuing and probably accelerating. So demand for most commodities (coal, copper, gold, silver, etc.) is flat or declining as prices drop and the per capita income levels drop. So cental bank monetarization and zirp are bad alternatives to job creation but better than social unrest resulting from austerity. Its like having serious cancer and the harsh treatment saves your life but the quality of life never returns.
Nice article.
ouch ! That inverted pyramid has a sharp apex!
I don't think Ben wants to have it falling on his head!
So I guess Al Qaeda is basically recycling the strategy used by the Oligarchy MAtrix in the financial domain :
1° Get the population to believe that gold is useless.
2° Get the population to believe that derivative and entitlement debt is nothing compared to QE liquidity. "We got that Blythe bitch under control".
3° Use psyops tactics to blur the strategy of those selling the gold meme.
Have a checklist of 222 articles, to put into place a coordinated action plan via the FED, PDs and its CB buddies, under Squid-Ayatollah coordination.
There you go!
Ben is brilliant lead global player; Caesar of fiat world, cloned by those bearded "drone" haters in contrarian Jihad mode.
Now that you guys have received a brllliant lecture on gold backwardation, I humbly submit my lateralised variant on Fiat-Jihad clonification.
ref : Al-Qaeda's 22 Tips For Evading Drones
Just for the sake of argument, I'll present an alternative reality.
"In both instances ('99 and '08) we believe the primary force causing gold backwardation was near catastrophic collapse in counterparty viability."
In both cases it was the market's perception based on the facts at the time that led to the backwardization. Both times the FED stepped in and changed the reality. In doing so they ignored laws and created situations that according to historical data couldn't exist. But exist they do. And backwardization disappeared. Promptly.
Let's re-visit a quote from Bush II:
"We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality—judiciously, as you will—we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors…and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do."
Remember, even if it's only can-kicking, if they can do it for 20+ years, the 99% will be forced to work with what the system gives them. No exceptions, bitchez.
Vae Victis...forever true. Especially if the victims are your own subjects.
'Cos your hegemony truly depends on FIRST controlling them; the enemy within, from YOUR perception as Caesar!
There is another explanation: Central Governments throughout the world will make ownership of physical gold by individuals illegal. Or they will make transactions in physical gold illegal.
Molon Labe!!!