This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

Meet The New US Petroleum Pipelines

Tyler Durden's picture




 

Still confused why crony capitalist #1, the "rustic" Octogenarian of Omaha, and Obama tax advisor #1, Warren Buffett has been aggressively attempting to corner the railroad market, while the administration relentlessly refuses to allow assorted new, and very much competing petroleum pipelines from America's neighbor to the north to cross through the US (in gratitude for the former's generous "tax advice" and pedigree by association)? Hint: it's not concern about the environment. The answer is the chart below.

Source: Diapason

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Sat, 03/09/2013 - 17:39 | 3315646 bilejones
bilejones's picture

The difference is in Domestic(and Canadian) v Imported sources. The pipeline for the major import hubs have long been in place. Not so the newly sourced shale/frack oil.

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 13:26 | 3317145 Flakmeister
Flakmeister's picture

If you are serious about what you just posted, I strongly suggest spend a week or so visiting theoildrum.com....

Sat, 03/09/2013 - 12:20 | 3314868 brown_hornet
brown_hornet's picture

Could that chart be overlayed on the chart for coal car loadings?

Sat, 03/09/2013 - 12:27 | 3314881 Mark123
Mark123's picture

duplicate post

Sat, 03/09/2013 - 13:06 | 3314953 theprofromdover
theprofromdover's picture

Not to worry, Buffett has already bought the pipelines to supply water southwards.

... you didn't know ..?

Sat, 03/09/2013 - 13:16 | 3314980 Individualist A...
Individualist Anarchist's picture

Because of the eminent domain used in the construction of the XL pipeline, I would have to say that its construction would be antithetical to the free market

Sat, 03/09/2013 - 15:04 | 3315261 Sabibaby
Sabibaby's picture

Rail is good for transportation, of things, yes but pipelines are better for transporting other things.

For example, would you transport water by rail?

Sat, 03/09/2013 - 15:16 | 3315306 bondman1
bondman1's picture

Wait.....isn't that US rail car loadings of coal upside down?

Sat, 03/09/2013 - 16:20 | 3315478 Flakmeister
Flakmeister's picture

Check coal exports and now you know why the rails have been on an absolute tear of late....

Sat, 03/09/2013 - 17:34 | 3315636 Kirk2NCC1701
Kirk2NCC1701's picture

Oil & gas happen to be a powerful and very useful forms of energy.  Think of it as ancient solar energy, stored in biomass.  But it's energy nonetheless.

If the chief goal is to have 'enough' energy to maintain a modern lifestyle, -- from the viewpoint of math & physics -- there is nothing wrong with extending the very large but finite supply of oil & gas for centuries, by striving for ever-better energy efficiency of our vehicles, planes, ships, cars, appliances and our lifestyles.  The more efficient, the longer it lasts.

Only a person with a questionable intellect, education or agenda would oppose this long-term strategy in favor of a short-term strategy.  A person with a binary, black & white position of "screw efficiency, just keep on drilling" is intellectually not credible and financially not trustworthy.

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 09:10 | 3316662 spanish inquisition
spanish inquisition's picture

A person with a binary, black & white position of "screw efficiency, just keep on drilling" is intellectually not credible and financially not trustworthy.

But that is one of the hallmarks of a fully trained US consumer

 

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 10:14 | 3316741 MaxThrust
MaxThrust's picture

This planet is going down the toilet. Give it another 30 years and it will be fucked. The good thing is I will be 90 and wont give a shit.

 

It will be good watching humans finally destroy themselves. We suck, time to que the monkeys.

 

Max

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 18:25 | 3317876 toros
toros's picture

If the economy is so bad, who is using all the oil?

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!