This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
The Fed Is Hiring: Lots Of Cops
Some may have forgotten, or not be aware, that the Federal Reserve system has its own police force. Well, it does: "The U.S. Federal Reserve Police is the law enforcement arm of the Federal Reserve System, the central banking system of the United States.... Officers are certified to carry a variety of weapons systems (depending on assignment) including semi-automatic pistols, assault rifles, submachine guns, shotguns, less-lethal weapons, pepper spray, batons and other standard police equipment. Officers also wear bullet resistant vests/body armor. On October 12, 2010 President Barack Obama signed into law S.B. 1132 the "Law Enforcement Officers' Safety Act Improvements Act", which states that law enforcement officers of the Federal Reserve are "qualified law enforcement officers" and thus are authorized to carry a firearm off-duty."
At last check, there were over 1000 sworn members of the Fed police force. And judging by the recent spike in appearances of such "help wanted" ads as those shown below, that number is too low. We expect many more job postings such as these to appear in the coming weeks and months: in fact, we are willing to predict that the closer we get to a "renormalization" of the Fed's balance sheet, the faster the hiring of Fed cops...
Position Summary:
Law Enforcement Officer
The Law Enforcement Officer is responsible for the protection of Bank property, valuables, and staff. Maintains security perimeter at building entrances, and performs routine building patrols to prevent unauthorized entry to premises, provide fire protection, and deter criminal and other irregular activities. Performs public relations functions by answering inquiries and providing direction to employees and visitors. Enforces federal laws and Federal Reserve policies and regulations to protect life, property and assets. Responds to incidents on Bank property and provides emergency services. This position is an essential function of the Bank and may require extended work hours and/or work during emergency or crisis situations.
* * *
Police Technician
It's about respect and recognition from your peers. It's you. At the Federal Reserve Bank, we operate a part of the nation's bank, helping to shape policies that enable people to purchase homes, send their children to school, and to live greater lives. It's a good feeling, knowing that your work holds such meaning. It's an even better feeling, knowing that you're doing so with a team that recognizes the talents that make you unique. Join us today.
Are you looking for a challenging and rewarding position? Look no further!
Key Responsibilities:
- Develops and maintains proficiency in areas such as weapons (lethal and non-lethal), first aid, CPR, fire fighting techniques, civil disorders, and public relations, by attending training classes. Must exhibit spontaneous good judgment over life and safety issues (shoot and don’t shoot scenarios, discrete handling of detected weapons and/or explosive devices, when to employ use of life saving and rescue equipment, etc.).
- Controls pedestrian and vehicle access to the facility, patrols building and reports unusual situations or unauthorized individuals. Responds to general alarm, provides emergency service, and follows local response protocol until the alarm or situation has been resolved. Monitors Bank departments for safety or security violation and reports findings to department management. May prepare and/or review appropriate shift reports and distributes as required. Works all posts. Prepares logs and input information pertaining to incident and daily activity reports in prescribed format.
- Monitors metal detectors or utilizes metal detection wands to scan visitors, personal items, and packages for unauthorized items. Monitors and authorizes visitors accessing Bank facilities and records visitor data on appropriate logs. Monitors surveillance equipment, intercoms, telephones, radios, and other specialized equipment. Inspects vehicles entering security sensitive areas for unauthorized personnel or contents.
- Operates as a law enforcement officer pursuant to the authority given the Board of Governors by Section 11 (q) of the Federal Reserve Act. Authorized personnel act as law enforcement officers pursuant to regulations of the Board of Governors and approved by the U.S. Attorney General (Uniform Regulations for Federal Reserve Law Enforcement Officers).
- On an as needed basis may conduct initial investigations into accidents and incidents, make proper notifications to the senior law enforcement officer on duty, and perform follow up duties as directed by supervisor. Could be needed to testify in court in response to a subpoena regarding accidents or incidents.
- Develops proficiency in use of personal computer (PC) and related software, computerized access and control systems, video surveillance equipment, x-ray and metal screening equipment, various alarms systems and Automated External Defibrillators.
- On an as needed basis may participate in special assignments to protect dignitaries of a Reserve Bank or the Board of Governors, this could include escorting visitors, contractors and/or vendors working in high security areas.
Qualifications:
- Education: High School Diploma or GED
- Experience: Less than two years
»
- 44945 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -
good proxy for SHTF meltdown
Nearby FR center near me in NJ. I see huge armored trucks every day carrying cash. These trucks can have 4 axles. Lots of cash. Like a few million to 100's of millions. One got jacked last summer. TPBT kept it really quiet.
Are they expecting blowback?
Well ... Just look at what is kept rarely seen by the people.
Real Homes, Real Dow
http://www.showrealhist.com/RHandRD.html
This status quo is the big con. Revelation & aggravation ...?
"The U.S. Federal Reserve Police is the law enforcement arm of the Federal Reserve System..."
And they can all be found at the doughnut shop, rather than bringing criminal bankers to justice.
I guess they don't need any in NYC since the NYPD their protectors.
It would probably be more effective to build crocodile infested moats around each of the fed buildings, with just a drawbridge to go in or out.
Oh wait that's already been done before...Slaps self on side of head.
" helping to shape policies that enable people to purchase homes, send their children to school, and to live greater lives"
The only way to accomplish these goals is to END THE FED!
Anyone who takes a job with the fed is a traitor, plain and simple. To protect the oligarchs instead of the people is indefensible.
"Key Responsibilities:"
Where is the key responsibility of bringing criminal bankers to justice?
I believe you have confused the justice system with the just-us system.
Why don't they just automatically apply all of the ACA "navigators" so that when that bail-out job comes to a close they can move on the Federal Reserve and carry a weapon. What could possibly go wrong?
Israel's National Orgasm
B.A.U. [Business as usual..] Look at what has unfolded with your naked eyes.. NSA, DHS, TSA and other alphabet soup agencies which have harvested to carbon copy Adolf Hitler, Stalin, Mao, and other dictatorial efforts. Food for thought! Their breakdown is in full visible view. Bravo, bravo!
No doubt. The beast comes into clearer view every day. Once fully exposed, if ever, it's enormity will be mind-boggling,
Disclosure has arrived, 5 minutes to twelve o'clock is all they have left. Anxiety resides on their shoulders. As a society in broad, we'll move on without them. Winks :>)
"Position Summary:
Law Enforcement Officer"
Massive felony financial fraud is a crime. No banker has been arrested and prosecuted for it.
Position summary is not that of law enforcement officer, as no bankers are to be arrested for committing financial criminal acts.
They are security officers, not law enforcers otherwise the FED would be shutdown overnight.
Not so! Ever heard of "prosecutorial discretion"?
Oh yes I forgot, now it more important for public security of the members of the FED rather than arrest the criminal activities of the too big to fail banks. /sarc
There's no need for the /sarc tag. They're there to protect the Fed's empire from its various enemies. They're not there to do "law enforcement" (a very nebulous term considering how "laws" are created). They do have enemies and their list of enemies is growing.
No, the prsidential EO makes them Officers of the Executive; they have arrest power as I read the EO.
Now, as to how that is legal or constitutional, I do not know.
The police force is just the meat to be fed to the zombies as the crooks make their getaway, in their limos, when all hell breaks loose.
Just what we need... more steriod heads and child abusers in uniform!
Gosh with all these various government agencies and central bankers getting ready to defend themselves with such redundancies, one might think they are not counting upon working well together.
"Must exhibit spontaneous good judgment over life and safety issues"
Some of the FED employees clearly lied on their résumés...
'"Must exhibit spontaneous good judgment over life and safety issues""
Because we can stamp that out. You crazy fuckers with the consistent good judgement need not apply.
"spontaneous good judgment over life and safety issues:" Would that be the same as keep shooting and keep them at bay until me and my G650 get airborn?
e
It means.... "I am paying you to protect me, so my life is more important than yours and if I die you will be dead soon thereafter, capisce"
Does greenspan stilll have protection? Will bernanke get protection, if so for how long?
They steal from the poor and make the poor pay for their protection. The Lords of the Middle Ages must be jealous.
My recollection is they have special plainclothes agents as security/bodyguards. They will not let you near their charges.
Private Police = Paramilitary
America's very own Guardia di Finanza. In time Americans will love their Guardia di Finanza as much as the Italians love theirs!
"Members have been known to occasionally demand VAT receipts for items from members of the public who have recently bought an item, dined at a restaurant, or otherwise incurred VAT."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guardia_di_Finanza
Less POMO, more Popo
When the POMO runs out, youre gonna need a shit-load of popo!
Yesterday, a Walmart officer forced me to buy a Hello Kitty dildo.
What's your excuse for using it?
How does the fed say this shit with a straight face (had me on the floor laughing)...
It's about respect and recognition from your peers. It's you. At the Federal Reserve Bank, we operate a part of the nation's bank, helping to shape policies that enable people to purchase homes, send their children to school, and to live greater lives. It's a good feeling, knowing that your work holds such meaning. It's an even better feeling, knowing that you're doing so with a team that recognizes the talents that make you unique.
In trade terms, I would put them up there with the Treasury Agents and top dog military units. They have to qualify at least 1X per month, we had to qualify 1X Year. You do not want to mess around with FedRes Officers.
The EO makes them Police Officers with Arrest Power. They now have all the usual authority of a Policeman.
I do not think even the FBI has jurisdiction over them, but that is just an opinion.
The Federal Reserve GESTAPO must be watching this site independent of NSA.
In the end they will be tasked with trying to protect the banksters from the guillotine they so rightfully deserve.
They will guard the Bankster all the way to the airport, hand them over to TSA which will get them on an El Al Airline flight.
Bullish!
Should add 0.000000000000000000000000001% to the employment numbers.
Fed, NSA, FBI, ECB, BIS, CIA, US Govt., etc. --- many arms of the SAME CRIMINAL GLOBAL MAFIA.
No, not at all - at least not how I see it {fwltmbw}. There are competing agencies and consortiums of power. Sometimes they act in concert, sometimes they don't.
For example, some people desperately want to preserve the petro-dollar. Others prefer its collapse and replacement.
And for all the Iran war drum beating, there's definitely a grand chessboard school of thought that wants to go right after Russia {and Stanistan}.
What does seem to be true is that the "elites" {I hate that fucking term for these fucks - rich and powerful doesn't mean brilliant} running the U.S. take very little note of the plight of the middle class, and their gameplans all seem to call for perpetual war against nations and groups that by and large pose no threat to the United States.
So what if some elites, not saying it's so, just asking - were able to move nation to nation fast enough with their assets they couldn't be stopped while using those assets to keep nations fighting each other so they don't co-operate enough to actually catch the game in real time?
Jus' sayin.
Fed Reserve popo prolly has this site on a forty foot screen with a dozen or so "ex-navigators" watching.
singing: Where have all the wal-mart greeters gone?
Somehow a 1000 seems a bit deficient when one looks at the opposition!
Federal Reserve cannot let the plantation workers escape from Stalag 13d. Global financiers’ must beef up security to insure no tax dollar escapes the established statist purchasing territory.
/LOL
As the FED now is what runs the country, its becoming clear to them they need more protection from political assasinations than the President or any leaders in Congress.
Loved the irony of the minister using the "plantation" analogy during the de Blasio inauguration. You simply cannot make this shit up! The peeps of NY absolutely deserve what they get. Consciously voting for another "nanny state Master" instead of freedom. ah. . . well. . . stupid is as stupid does.
Of course what will really get everyone's goat is when people realize that CHINA acquired the private corporation known as the Federal Reserve last October when it acquired JP Morgan. So now it has The Fed AND a private police force ready to go. Sounds crazy? Fast-Forward to the 16-minute mark. Paraphrased, Jim Willie explains:
http://www.tfmetalsreport.com/podcast/5349/jackass-roasting-open-fire
And you do realize that CHINA just acquired a huge stake in FOX [PROPAGANDA] NEWS last Friday, right? What? You mean they didn't report that to you? hmmm how strange. See:
http://thebricspost.com/murdoch-sells-stake-in-star-china
i'm all for good tinfoil, but let's clarify some facts
(1) per that "FOX" link, the purchase was for Star TV in CHINA of which the purchaser already owned the majority stake. not FOX (or what we know as FOX).
(2) agreed that there is something mysterious behind the scenes going on with the JPM building purchase, especially after the tylers exposed how the vault is connected with the FED. but until Jackass starts dropping some evidence to back up his tales, i choose to discount everything he has to say by at least a factor of 3.
YMMV of course.
goy i believe means cattle.
you are a food source energy rather than stale flesh.
blood and soul are important.
time is slipping you are an island.
protect yourself from these satanic saturn loving demons that want your life force.
Not according to wikipedia:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goy
Of course, there seems to be a fesity debate in the history: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Goy
I think that the idea that it means 'cattle' isn't true philologically or what have you, but it may be used as a term of derision by some {presumably mostly ultra-Orthodox?} Jewish peeps, but that doesn't mean the word itself is slanderous.
http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/6841-goy
By they same token, the English word "Jew" isn't in any way offensive, but some people use it in an offensive manner. Doesn't mean the word itself means anything slanderous - often its how something is used {which the wiki article doesn't discuss at all, in fairness}. I think Louis C.K. had a joke to the effect that the word 'Jew' is the only term that is a word for a group of people and a term of offense for that group... yeah...here at around 5:45
The Fed has been more under scrutiny the past few years than any other time in its 100 year history. When it fails to keep the economy moving (and it will), things might get 'unpleasant'.
"The concept of Liberty itself tends to disappear permanently inside increasingly militarized societies of private armies."
http://failedevolution.blogspot.gr/2014/01/how-western-societies-lost-th...
Well, there is certainly no cap on the budget for security...
The argument for the NSA would be stronger if they used all that computing power to police the high percentage of criminal acts that are performed every day on WS. An entry level forensic accountant could arrest 30-40% of WS.
After a few years of that, WS would be cleaned up of all the psychopaths...
As it is now, this is just to keep the slaves in line (99%)
"If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their Fathers conquered...I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies... The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs."
Jefferson
I guess with the FED we get the bank and their own standing army.
BITCOIN Cheaper safer and patriotic.
A private , independent bank, owned by some anonymous entities has it's own militarized police force...
Nothing strange about that!
Fuck! I really have lived to see verything now. The Federal Reserve with it's own police! America is a police state, even more than Hitler's Germany was. Notice America has more people behind bars in absolute numbers and percapita. Increasingly they are held in private for profit prisons. America has so many laws, anyone is liable to arrest for breaking at least one. And Ignorance of the law is no excuse. So why all these cops? Simple, to sow fear and dread among the little people. Like the soviet and nazi experiments, America's total spy and police state experiment will collaspe, trouble is, before it dies it will take millions of the little people straight to hell with it. As elites grow richer and have more control over congress and state houses, this police state will expand. I ask you, how much to you respect today's cops and federal agents? For me, I am though with giving them respect, I pay their wages and their fat pensions, Shouldn't that be enough. My fucking cousin was a small town cop, he retired at 50 with a pension bigger than mine will be when I retire 15 years after him. Go figure!
I understand. I have a bunch of dumb rednecks around me who are the biggest gamers of the system. One redneck 'works for the city'. He's okay with all the other rednecks as soon as he plays some whining country music and pays the drinks.
All of them whine constantly about how the black man is gaming the system.
Some of them even signed for Obamacare. Then they realized it won't work and told me: well, I'll just go to the ER. And who is paying for that ER. Me, while they sell drugs, get drunk, pretend on ZH.
so this is like JPM & GS having their own police force with "Federal" powers
"helping to shape policies that enable people to purchase homes, send their children to school, and to live greater lives"
It seems to be a big deal if you lie on your job application, I guess to lie on the job description...not so much.
Tatoos and gats issued at roll call.
How are they going to pay those police when the dollar hyper inflates to nothing?
They aren't, your kids and grand kids are.
The american communist/socilist/fascist/zionist puppet Fed is Hiring: communist/socialist/fascist/zionist pig traitor turncoats to make war on all American citizens.
FIXED!
I'm sure this has been asked and answered hundreds of times before but:
How can one find out, from an authoritative source, who owns the Federal Reserve (let's say the NY Fed specifically) right now?
I believe there's some strange division where the FOMC is deemed a government agency, but the banks themselves are private entities which don't, therefore, have to response to FOIA requests - which seems odd as hell.
I don't know anything about what lawsuits have filed and failed, and while the Fed Reserve Act seems to me to have been unconstitutional on its face, it doesn't matter what I think, and it's well settled that the courts consider it a lawful delegation of Congressional power. I'm sure most of the lawsuits that could be tried have been tried - so it comes down to Congress.
So maybe there's simply no way to know who owns the banks that keep loaning fiat currency to our government at interest that we all have to pay back through our toils?
That's fucked up, yo.
I always thought Congress was crooked and ineffective, but for a while, I had at least hoped they'd do a token audit of the fed. It wouldn't have been bona fide, of course, but at least more Americans would be aware of the basics of how the FRS works.
A bit off-tipic, but maybe not that much...
Thanks for the link last night to the Chicago handgun SCOTUS decision. I read it last night and this morning (200+ pages, Do I get a gold star?)
The decision to throw out the handgun ban was 5-4. Pretty close. Of the 4 against, Justice Steven filed a reasonable opinion (of which I won't go into). But the three other dissenting Justices (Breyer, Ginsburg, and Sotomayor), concluded, in Breyer's words: "...the Framers did not write the Second Amendment in order to protect a private right of armed self-defense. There has been, and is, no consensus that the right is, or was 'fundamental'. No broader constitutional interest or principle supports legal treatment of that right as fundamental."
So three of nine Justices think people have no right of armed self-defense.
Fucking scary. Plan accordingly.
gold star awarded. thanks for the summation, very interesting, especially that Stevens chose to write his own opinion. did he have anything to say about the word "fundamental"? would appreciate to hear your summation if you have a moment. if not, no worries, can look it up myself.
edit found at least a wikipedia blurb from the opinion (fwiw): "The Court would have us believe that over 200 years ago, the Framers made a choice to limit the tools available to elected officials wishing to regulate civilian uses of weapons.... I could not possibly conclude that the Framers made such a choice." - Stevens dissenting opinion
That pretty much says it all.
But just for the record, Stevens and your fellow statist bastards on the Supreme Cunt, isn't the US Constitution fundamentally itself nothing more than a "tool" (supposedly) limiting the power of "elected officials wishing to regulate" against the fundamental rights of the citizens?
One of the reason I bothered to read a 200 page court decision was because I couldn't understand why the decision was so dependent on the 14th amendment, not the 2nd. I had to read almost the whole thing before I finally got the concept that the Bill of Rights doesn't actually apply to us.
The 14th amendment says only some of the rights in the Bill of Rights are really rights. It isn't clear the 2nd amendent is one of the those rights. 6 SCOTUS think it is (well, 5, if you don't count Stevens) and 3 think it isn't.
Enlightening reading.
yeah, the 14th seems to be the key to all the whole ball of wax.
note the use of the word "persons" in the latest NSA response.
very telling methinks.
I'm no Constitutional scholar, but from what I've read, Stevens and Ginsburg frighten me. The word "fascist" is thrown around a lot these days - but they really do seem to be in the ballpark. This NYT article is a decent summary on McD v. Chicago
Stevens talked about how the need for a militia or for freed slaves had little to do with the plight of homeowners in urban areas today - and one has to wonder, did he not appreciate that in a colonialist society, home protection from people and animals was a basic reason people would own a weapon?
The claim that Chicago's gun laws saved lives may or may not be true - but how many lives were lost because people couldn't protect themselves? Chicago's gun violence is still remarkably high with tough gun laws on the books.
I also don't understand how the court could decide a couple years earlier that a fucking Amendment bestowed a private/individual right, but the liberals come away saying there's nothing to indicate the right is "fundamental" - in other words, they're saying that despite the fact its mentioned in the constition itself, and the SC already settling that it was a private right, they should still get to decide whether the right is 'fundamental' or not.... and if they decide it isn't, under their jurisprudence, which is not found in the Constitution itself of course, they case essentially always find a way to uphold a restrictive state or federal law.
The SC power grab is at least as deleterious to representational democracy and basic human freedom as anything the Executive is doing in its quest to go Full Imperial.
Stevens started losing his fastball years ago, but he will hang on until he is drooling and shitting his pants for fear that federal government power be ever frustrated if a more moderate and/or reasonable justice takes his place - and actually, he is often deemed one of the more moderate liberals. He may be compared to Ginsburg {and maybe Soto?} who doesn't seem to think the Constitution means anything apart from how 5 out of 9 justices "interpret" them.
Whether or not this is 'post-modernism' or 'legal realism' it essentially substitutes' a group of unelected lawyers' political sensibilities for the very process and purpose of Constitutional government.
They have been claiming 2+2 = 5 for so long that most of the Constitutional jurisprudence we have looks anything like how it was intended. Surely, times change and maybe we need a new Convention to address ambiguities - but that's different from having Justice Stevens decide there's no right to X because he doesn't like X. That is not legal analysis - it's political soapboxing.
Originalism has its limits, but in my view, if a law conflicts with the plain language of the Constitution, it's not lawful - regardless of what the SCOTUS has to say about it. Those that disagree with this should ask themselves this: Where in the Constitution is the power to amend the Constitution given to the Supreme Court {or any other branch} - if you can't find it, then you don't have a constitutional basis to disagree with my approach. Naturally, in practice, interpretation is often needed because there are ambiguities or things on which the Constitution is silent. But interpretation based on history, etc. is not the same thing as invention or the use of one's personal political ideology.
In a nutshell - I don't think government, federal or state "should" have the power to outlaw abortions or birth control - but conjuring a privacy right out of thin air to achieve your political ends is horseshit.
You may not think its horseshit because, hey, you have a "right" to it - but when you let the government invent rights at will, you let them abridge them on a whim. And then ultimately, the government is no longer tethered to the limiting principles of the Constitution.
And then we're right fucked.
Which is where we are now, and have been for quite a while. The boulder started rolling long ago... it's now approaching terminal velocity.
"Surely, times change and maybe we need a new Convention to address ambiguities - but that's different from having Justice Stevens decide there's no right to X because he doesn't like X."
That's the problem in a nutshell.
It's clear some people don't like guns and it's also clear the Constitution says the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. Seems clear to me, at least. Trying to say government can infringe people's right to keep and bear bear arms is, well, unconstitutional. So a lot a bullshit about the 14th amendment has to be slung to cover up a clear statement in the 2nd.
"Stevens started losing his fastball years ago, but he will hang on until he is drooling and shitting his pants for fear that federal government power be ever frustrated if a more moderate and/or reasonable justice takes his place"
Stevens already retired and was replaced by Elena Kagan. To be honest I'd take an old-style leftist like Stevens or Ginsburg, who occasionally recognize civil liberties as long as money and guns aren't involved, over the new all-statism-all-the-time leftists like Kagan.
wow, i never read Wickard vs. Filburn, that's pretty nutty the way they twisted the commerce clause.
stopping a man from growing wheat on his own land to feed his own chickens.
fucking attorneys.
The root for the term “attorney” originates in Sanskrit (the oldest known language) and its original meaning was “to turn or to twist”. That meaning carried forward largely unaltered into the English language. The letter “a”, when used as a word, is defined as “an indefinite article” and when used as a prefix it equates with the word “one” (indefinite article) which modifies the base word (torn) accordingly—as does the suffix “ey”.
I thought the most interesting part of the Stevens' dissent was his pointing out that the 'victors' in the Chicago case may someday rue their win. Stevens notess that the Court has now set national gun policy for the first time, rather than leaving the regulation of gun-ownership to the states. While the Court's decision this time was in favor of gun ownership, the next decision (think of those three other dissenting Justices) could go the other way - which would mean a national gun policy.
It's one thing if a local juristiction (e.g. Chicago) makes a gun law - if you don't like it, fine: move or vote out the legislators responsible. It's a different matter if a national gun law is promulgated. You could say we already have those, but the national laws are quite limited - currently - compared to what is in effect in some places.
Stevens' pointing out that national gun policies are inherently bad is the reason I think his dissent is not as troubling as the other three dissents.
Stevens' (IIRC) did seem to accept a fundamental right of self-defense - so no complaint from me there.
"Stevens notess that the Court has now set national gun policy for the first time, rather than leaving the regulation of gun-ownership to the states."
Nonsense. The NFA (1934) and GCA (1968) already regulate firearms ownership and transfers nationally, and the GFSZA (1996) regulates carrying of firearms on nearly every square inch of public property in populated areas. Stevens is making crap up as always.
idiot - it's the power of the FEDERAL COURT.
They never used THEIR power for this before.
Existing laws are the realm of US CONGRESS AND SENATE, not the Supreme Court.
So now they are officially allowed to tinker too.
That's the warning.
In the early stages of the Occupy Wall Street movement, before it turned into an excuse to riot, I met 2 young men from Oregon. They were sons of farmers and their family farms were being foreclosed. They told me that they felt like they had no options but to protest and occupy the sidewalk at the SF FED. They relayed to me an incident involving the Fed Police: in the middle of one night night all the SFPD that had been stationed at the protest site suddenly left without warning. Shortly thereafter, Federal Reserve Police moved in and began beating all the protesters and confiscated all of their belongings. To my knowledge, nothing of this event was ever reported in the mainstream media.
In the early stages of the Occupy Wall Street movement, before it turned into an excuse to riot, I met 2 young men from Oregon. They were sons of farmers and their family farms were being foreclosed. They told me that they felt like they had no options but to protest and occupy the sidewalk at the SF FED. They relayed to me an incident involving the Fed Police: in the middle of one night night all the SFPD that had been stationed at the protest site suddenly left without warning. Shortly thereafter, Federal Reserve Police moved in and began beating all the protesters and confiscated all of their belongings. To my knowledge, nothing of this event was ever reported in the mainstream media.
Let the truth be told
the entire time it was the police rioting.
The actual protesters never did riot.
The story's been a lie all along.
They were unarmed and attacked while protesting the unlawful removal of money, property & freedoms.
SOME were a little idiotic demanding higher taxes for their own benefit to the detriment of others but once Occupy the Fed and Occupy the SEC got into gear I think some of them got told off good and proper about how wrong they were.
Some still feel the same way but understanding how much theft happens in the name of government is something they can't deny - so how can they dare ask to be the beneficiary of the theft?
The Fed can hire and do what they want. They ain't getting out alive
Our policies seem to be making people desperate to the point where they occupy wall street and openly talk about wanting to kill central bankers. Maybe we should hire more police so these people don't try to stop us.
I once pulled a job at a Reserve Branch of the Fed (what a term!).
Some security modifications were needed. Those dudes have portable SAMS. I was also flipped out by the amount of counterfeit the counters were kicking out. This was 20 years ago. I bet moar funny money is pouring thru there today....
SOMEONE has to use those 1.6 BILLION rounds of 40 S&W!
Oh ya, we've learned all too well there can't ever be enough ammo for the police state, or enough police, not until all citizens are crushed for any utterance that is anti-government & pro-freedom.
Soon they'll have a Presidential Dancing police to make sure you all dance like little puppets for the Dear Beloved Leader.
He has a powerful weapon
He charges a million a shot,
An assassin that's second to none,
The man with the golden gun.
His eye may be on you or me.
Who will he bang?
We shall see. Oh yeah!
One golden shot means another poor victim,
Has come to a glittering end,
If you want to get rid of someone,
The man with the golden gun
Will get it done
He'll shoot anyone
With his golden gun.
Believe when I tell ya. This crew could not protect it's own shadow. "B"Rated Chicken Shit.
If they resemble the help hired at other Federal facilities to man the front door, think TSA agents... Meh? More closely resemble bullet stoppers than gestapo storm troopers.
The Federal Reserve police have the same legal status as the Federal Express police.
No matter how many they hire it will not stop the guillotines from rolling.
sokkomb
http://www.youtube.com/user/Sokkomb