This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
You Have The Right To Stay Out Of Jail (Or How To Handle A Police Encounter)
Simply put, you have the right to remain out of prison... even if you are not a US citizen...
Source: Online-Paralegal-Programs.com
»
- 49913 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -
Yea I was there when wilson got run over too.
this works
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WFxijuRjX1U
The FBI just recently dropped "law enforcement" as its primary mission, which is now officially "national security".
"In many ways, the agency had no choice but to de-emphasize white-collar crime. Following the 9/11 attacks, the FBI picked up scores of new responsibilities related to terrorism and counterintelligence while maintaining a finite amount of resources."
FBI Drops Law Enforcement as 'Primary' MissionFBI Drops Law Enforcement as 'Primary' Mission
Can you imagine an FBI case worker that goes after a white-collar criminal, I mean that would be the end of an FBI career.
Far better to go into the Gay Edgar Hoover 'kiddy porn locker' ( Hoover said to have the largest collection of child porn on earth ), and then place that shit on peoples computers and sting them.
The job of the FBI since 1930's was to 'investigate', e.g. to find dirt on anybody and take them out.
***
Another you kids may be missing is that the FBI/IRS now have more agents in field offices outside the USA, than inside, so certainly the majority of work is NOT even in the USA to begin with.
The way I look at all this is the job of all agencys is to make sure criminals are using USD when they commit their rapes and murder,... otherwise its all GOOD.
This is all bullshit.
There is only one way to win.
HAVE the best lawyer money can buy, he shop's for the right judge, and they deal quid-pro-quo out of court and you walk early.
Otherwise the system drains you of resource and fucks you to death, not to mention the inmates will fuck you to death, after the cops corn-hole you with brooms while your in early incarceration.
***
The USA legal system is hopelessly corrupt the JUDGES are bored to tears and don't give a fuck about anything, and the LAWYERS are all playing a game called "Run this case until all the family CASH is gone", then they dump you like a soiled tampon.
***
The problem I have is just living in the USA even if your the fucking flying-nun, you can't hide from the bastards they're everywhere, fucking CAM's and shit, I dread visiting the USA, getting past the CUSTOMS is the easy part. The hard part is riding a bike or walking down the street, the cops see you on foot and they know something is up :(
You got to start from the bottom around here.
If you like your rights, you can keep them.
If I can just get off of this LA freeway without gettin' killed or caught, I'd be down the road in a cloud of smoke for some land that I ain't bought. Guy Clark, LA Freeway
If you want to get out of Dodge, you have to move away from 'America'.
CIA Man by the Fugs:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hW9cCWm53H4
Try the Jerry Jeff Walker rendition.
Jerry Jeff Walker is a guy who knows all about how to not stay out of jail.
Clash: KNOW YOUR RIGHTS!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e_dV1P5hZTI
The way I see it, all cops are pigs, and should be treated as such by the public.
Can't have all these pesky rules with 'for-profit' prisons. How dare you run that red light!! That's 6 months for you terrorist!!!
"For profit prisons" is one of the scariest things in this society any more... we are providing incentive to lock people up and make every person a criminal....
Jacques Derrida was fond of quoting Aristotle at the opening of his lectures :
"My friends, there is no friend."
The Police are not your friend. You are simply a mark on their P/L. They are profit centers.
The Government is not your friend. NSA, IRS, Potus, etc. Same as above.
Corporations are not your friend. Same as above.
You can substitute just about anything.
Except your dog. Your dog will always be your friend, and will show you more love and loyalty than you can give.
Thanks for the excellent post.
I posted it on the local town forum as I see too many people getting pulled over and losing all their rights, etc..
http://newcanaan.patch.com/boards/announcements
Too bad in this hedge haven town very few are exposing the fraud!
In regards to filming the police... ZH readers might enjoy this website... http://photographyisnotacrime.com/
Info on the breathalyzer in the infographic above is incomplete and misleading.
See the following site, for example: http://www.hughesbentzen.com/content/view/70/63/
and note the following distinction:
RULE # 4. YOU ARE NOT REQUIRED TO PERFORM ROADSIDE PORTABLE
BREATHYLYZER TESTS. DO NOT PERFORM THEM UNDER ANY
CIRCUMSTANCES, NO MATTER WHAT THE OFFICER TELLS YOU.
... Do not blow into one of these devices at the scene for any reason. The
results can only hurt you.
RULE #6. IF YOU ARE ARRESTED FOR DUI, YOU ARE LEGALLY
OBLIGATED TO BLOW INTO A BREATHALYZER AT THE STATION IF
ASKED TO DO SO. FAILURE TO COMPLY IS A CRIME IN AND OF ITSELF.
In most states (including DC and Virginia, where I happen to practice), it is a
crime to refuse to give a breath sample once arrested for driving under the influence.
Why? Because under the law, your decision to obtain a driver’s license and operate a
motor vehicle in any given state means that you have, by legal implication, already given
your consent to be tested under such circumstances. Hence, it is legally referred to as
“implied consent.” In most states, failure to give a breath sample into a breathalyzer (not
the little roadside PBT device I was mentioning above) can subject you to fines and/or
imprisonment, and most assuredly, a suspension of your license for a considerable period.
In Virginia, for example, those convicted of “refusal” face a mandatory 12 month loss of
license, with no opportunity even for a restricted license to drive to and from work.
You practice in DC and Virginia? You are a lawyer? Great. On the issue of implied consent. From a constitutional/judicial perspective implied consent is nothing more than summary conditions imposed under the licensed privilege. And herein lies the real controversy.
There exists an entire body of case law that confirms that ordinary use of the publics right of ways by the public is NOT a privilege but a fundamental right. Actually the exercise of several rights. The right of free movement or locomotion. The right of PROPERTY that every individual citizen has in common or ordinary use. And as the power to tax is the power to destroy, this RIGHT cannot be the proper object of an excise.
The courts have also drawn the distinction between the RIGHT of common use subject to ordinary regulation under the police powers, and the PRIVILEGE to operate a motor vehicle for profit and gain. Those would be extraordinary uses outside the terms of the TRUST in which our property in common is held. Within the context of those extraordinary uses (usually business/occupationally relationship) the legislature can PROHIBIT altogether OR allow the USE and create a license to regulate. SUMMARY CONDITIONS imposed under the license (mandatory seat belts, insurance, ect) pose a political question upon the courts. Due process under these conditions are usually limited to mere judicial review of administrative procedures to insure that those similarly situated are treated equally under the law. For the most part, the constitution is irrelevent.
What we are dealing with here is a breach of the public trust along with possible corruption by our trustees (legislature). BY failing the properly identify and regulate the public, there have automatically moved us over to the mere privileged side of administrative law. What the governmerment has done is they have identefied and thus taxed and regulated the public as mere tresspassers on our inailenable right of ways. Once classified, not only does the legislature have vitually unlimited regulatory powers (even if the reg operates to prohibit altogether), but now they can place summary conditions on the use and disposition of your car as you must now seek permission from an administartive agency to TRANSFER whater property interest you have through State tiitling systems. A prime example of an admixture of both police and taxing powers.
WE have a judicial remedy to all this. It must be done outside the administative processes and mere judicial review within the context of those processes. In other words, until a proper controversy can be created in which the courts of law and equity have the power to recognize that ordinary or common use is a fundamental right for due process and equal protection purposes, WE are going to be stuck with this police state mentality and the courts are powerless to interfere in any substantial way. They simply do not deal with political questions and are barred under the doctrine of separation of powers from interfereing with the conditions imposed under the license.
1. If you are going to argue with a cop, do it in court. He is much less likely to shoot you there.
2. The only rights you have are the rights that you are aware of and capable of protecting in a court of law or equity. And that is without an attorney, who will charge you a lot to lose.
3. No court will ever rule against the will of the legislatures (codes and statute) unless presented with a constitutional question.
"We'd like to avoid any Imperial entanglements."
From what I recall it didn't work out too well for the planet.
So is it art imitating life or ?
Last spring I was going to work-- one shift out of four I travel during the day-- down the ridiculous 1/2 mile of grammar, junior and high public school system/prison complex, when a cop stopped me. I was following traffic, but speeding on a 25 mph zone. A female cop asked me if I knew why she stopped me. Do you know that fines are double in a school zone? I answered her questions, that were phrased in a " you stupid male" kind of twist. I wanted to ask her, Do you know that your bosses, the Feds kill millions of these children in their mother's wombs every year, and if so why are you still working for them?
well with your accelerated heartrate, visible perspiration and erect nipples, I'd say the reason you stopped me was you were in heat
judge as cash register, part of a team with police and prosecutor to raise muni revs.
http://www.app.com/article/20140106/NJNEWS2002/301060094/Eatontown-counc...