This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
The Panic Behind The Propaganda: Why The Fed Wants You To Sell Your Bonds
As Barclays' Joe Abate warns, delivery fails in the Treasury market have surged recently. While not at the scale of the 2008 crisis yet, we suspect the spike is what is panicking the Fed to say "the market is wrong", talk up short-end rates, and implore the public to sell-sell-sell their bonds. The Fed's market domination has meant massive collateral shortages (as we have detailed previously) and now more even that during last year's taper-tantrum, the repo market is trouble.
The fails are greater than during last year's taper tantrum.
But well below the 2008 crisis levels (for now)
Which is why The Fed is in panic mode to get everyone selling bonds.
As Abate write in his note,
Delivery fails in the Treasury market have surged recently. On Monday, the DTCC reported that incomplete deliveries reached a 52-week high at $120bn (Figure 1). And a week earlier, Treasury fails – as measured by the Federal Reserve – exceeded 6% of daily dealer Treasury transactions volumes. By contrast, usage of the Fed’s securities lending program has been relatively constant at around $15bn/day. Recall that each day the Fed auctions securities from its securities portfolio (at a 5bp fee) for dealers to borrow overnight to cover their shorts. In effect, the securities lending program is a backstop source of specific issue supply that dealers can access temporarily to prevent market disruptions caused by fails or incomplete deliveries.
But what if the Fed does not own any of the issues that dealers need? Indeed, this appears to be driving the surge in recent fails, which have been concentrated in the OTR 5s and 10s. Operation Twist and the sale of all the Fed’s <3y paper has meant that the Fed does not own any securities that mature until early 2016. Without maturing paper, the Fed is unable to buy OTR issues at Treasury auctions. The fact that the OTR issues are trading special in the repo market also means that the Fed avoids buying these securities in its (diminishing) QE purchases.
In the absence of Fed supply, dealers face a choice: fail and pay a 300bp fee for not completing the promised delivery or offer a sufficiently low financing rate to coax supply of the issue back into the market. In effect, the 300bp fails charge becomes the threshold determining how rich an issue will trade in the repo market or whether it will fail.4 Regularly scheduled re-openings and supply lured in from customer holdings in lendable accounts will eventually cheapen these issues. But in the meantime, the issues are likely to trade deeply special.
A quick reminder of what the repo market is... (via IMF)
Think of the bilateral repo market via the analogy for old clothing trade: Typically, merchants in developed countries shrink wrap old clothes in shipping container sized bundles (under pressure) and send the plastic wrapped block to poor countries. There, a clothing broker buys it, and resells it by weight to jobbers. So if the block weighs 500 pounds and they sell it in 10 pound lots, all 50 people gather around. But some people pay slightly more to be at the front of the crowd, and some pay slightly less to be at back. Then the jobber pops the bundle open with a big knife and the shrink wraps literally explodes; everyone gathered around jumps for the best pieces.
Collateral desks are a bit like those jobbers. Big lots come in from hedge funds and security lenders, and the large bank’s collateral desk paws through it, searching for gems. Those gems go out bilateral to customers who'll pay a premium. The remainders go to the guys in the back of the line (for example, triparty repo)
* * *
But why do I care about some archaic money-market malarkey? Simple, Without collateral to fund repo, there is no repo; without repo, there is no leveraged positioning in financial markets; without leverage and the constant hypothecation there is nothing to maintain the stock market's exuberance (as we are already seeing in JPY and bonds).
Crucially, it should be inherently obvious to everyone that the moves we see in the stock market is not about mom and pop choosing to invest in the stock market (or not) as the 'cash on the slidelines' fallacy is "completely idiotic' but about the marginal leveraged machine (or human) quickly jumping oin momentum.
The spike in "fails to deliver" highlights a major growing problem in the repo markets that provide that leverage... and thus the glue that holds stock markets together.
Wondering why JPY and bond yields have diverged so notably from stocks in recent days... repo effects (it's just a matter of time before it hits stocks)...
So that explains why the Fed is so desperate to talk you into selling your bonds - most notably the short-end by demanding you listen to what Yellen said about raising rates.. as that reduces the shortfall of collateral that repo needs and restocks the banks with repo-able funds.
* * *
Is that why a noted dove like Jim Bullard was so visibly hawkish yesterday?
The irony of course of the Fed explaining how rates will rise faster is that it spooks stock investors who have grown used to exuberant liquidity supply and roitates them to bonds... which merely exacerbates the problem the Fed has
- 57340 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -






Boy, this system is fragile. Scares the hell out of me.
Would love to have a transcript of the last 24 hours of Bullards and Yellens thoughts (NSA, could you help out pls?). They must literally be wetting their pants.
Regardless of what you name it the "Federal Reserve Nightmare" or the "Yellen conundrum", the box Ben Bernanke made when he painted both himself and the Federal Reserve in a corner remains. Bernanke has by passing the chairmanship to Yellen escaped from the QE trap but left the rest of us fully in its grasp.
With a policy of loose and cheap money and an inflation target of just 2% the Federal Reserve continues to please those gambling that not fighting the Fed guarantees profits. As many Americans are forced to pay higher food, gasoline, and health insurance premiums, I wish someone would let the Fed know we are already there. Any thought that inflation is not higher has come from the false illusion brought from lower payments on things like auto loans and mortgages, this is a one off and will not continue. More on this subject in the article below.
http://brucewilds.blogspot.com/2014/06/exit-strategy-from-qe-remains-elu...
Bonds? What bonds?
After coming to ZH, everyday for 4 years , I just started to realize something (perhaps I'm slow)...the weekends are too quiet....are we to believe nothing has happened in the past 12 hours anywhere in the world ??.....or that if this was a Wednesday, there would be no news, updates, etc. At 10AM eastern. ......my point is, how is it always so quiet every weekend for over 48 hours....do all the "bad people" in the world also take off on the weekends.....it just seems to me as I get older, very strange (and now obvious)how the calendar has such strong influence on world events !!! ?????
ZH seems to be primarily fed with news Monday to Friday from 9 to 5 Eastern Daylight Time. Sometimes also until 7pm.
But hey, everybody needs a weekend. I wouldn't complain.
But of course it would be great to have some local Tylers in Asia or Middle East. Also lot's of stuff happening in Europe.
Austria (Hypo Alpe Adria toxic beyond belief), Poland (government crisis), Italy (Monte dei Paschi bankrupcy), Bulgaria (Bank run), Switzerland (CS Dark Pool chaos), etc.
How about google-translating http://deutsche-wirtschafts-nachrichten.de/ or www.insideparadeplatz.ch? They have a lot of the missing news for Europe in German language...
LOLZ Seasmoke that's cause ZH readers have a life! We read the board during the day while doing our bullshit finance or other work.
On the weekends:
HH cooks shit from his garden
CD does who knows what
DoChen plays with his balls
Many, Many ZH'ers go boating on weekends but loose stuff cause they are finance geeks and suck at boating
Recently the re-hypothication practices of Chinese warehouses have been revealed and are being treated as felonies. My question is: how is this different from the re-hypothication of gold, or the re-hypothication of securites by the investment banks - neither of which is treated as a felony. In fact, the Fed appears to be using this ability to maintain liquidity and overcome inter-bank distrust. I would welcome the comments of anyone more intimately knowledgeable on this subject.
John Williams Video from January 2014:
http://usawatchdog.com/2014-crisis-in-dollar-will-trigger-inflation-john... (Greg Hunter USAWatchdog.com)
1) He says we are in a Depression & Never Recovered from 2006 when he was warning
2) Danger of HyperInflation in 2014
3) Will Start with Dollar Crisis
4) Says we already have Overseas bankers calling for US Reform
5) USA has $6.8 Trillion yearly Deficit under GAAP Rules where unfunded pension, medicare, ACA, and Pension Health Care Benefits are all huge liabilities for which there is no political will to solve and for which there is no answer
6) He says you could tax all individuals 100% and you would still have a huge budget deficit OR you could terminate DoD, Medicare, and Social Security and you still would have huge deficit (or said something like that)
7) He says this is unsound (duh) and we have no personal consumption and already have Inflation in food & Gasoline since the Dollar lost value
8) He says 1 July 2014 FACTA comes into play and foreign banks are giving up dollars and doing business in Dollars which will pour Dollars back into the US Economy
So buy Foreign Assets, gold, or silver.
Anyway seems like a good Video.