This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
Obama To Overrule Supreme Court? President Considers "Mitigating" Obamacare Ruling
Having had his omnipotence chipped away at last week, President Obama has - seemingly - been pushed too far by the Supreme Court's decision on contraception and Obamacare this morning: The White House stated...
- SUPREME COURT DECISION ON CONTRACEPTION COVERAGE JEOPARDIZES HEALTH OF WOMEN EMPLOYED BY THESE COMPANIES
- WILL WORK WITH CONGRESS TO MAKE SURE WOMEN AFFECTED BY RULING WILL HAVE SAME ACCESS TO CONTRACEPTION
- WILL CONSIDER WHETHER PRESIDENT CAN ACT ON HIS OWN TO MITIGATE EFFECT OF SUPREME COURT RULING
Totalitarian? You decide... One wonders if the phrase "do you know who I am?" was uttered this morning?
White House press secretary Josh Earnest said women should be able to "make personal health decisions for themselves,” and called contraception "vital" to the health and well-being of women.
...
"We will, of course, respect the Supreme Court ruling,” he added.
...
Republicans cheered the ruling as a victory for religious freedom.
“The decision affirms that Americans, contrary to what the Obama administration attempted to impose, have a right to live and work in accordance to their conscience and can’t be forced to surrender their religious freedom once they open a business,” Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) said in a statement.
»
- 35402 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -
If you can abuse your power you have too much
Zero's abuses of power are nothing new. Now he is going to "borrow power" to fix immigration:
Sen. Durbin: Obama Will 'Borrow the Power' to Solve Immigrationhttp://www.cnsnews.com/mrctv-blog/eric-scheiner/sen-durbin-obama-will-bo...
I get it. The term "borrowing power" is synonomous with "Imperial decree". Obama can go eat a bag of dicks.
He would enjoy that too much. Make him eat a wookie muff, now there is some punishment.
Wookie "muff". You sir, presume too much methinks.
True, but the fowl beast is digusting none the less.
Black guys don't eat muff.
Reggie says you be raycisst and wrong .... O loves eating is chocolate tube muff..in
NoDebt, a brotha once told me, "If God had meant for us to eat pussy it would've come with a spoon."
I heard the same thing years ago. To which I damned near asked "you mean like fried chicken?" but decided I'd rather not get my ass beat down just for a great punchline.
Woulda been worth it. And you'd be surprised by how infrequently the average person actually gets offended. Thankfully, for me, because my personal mouth filter is constantly on the fritz.
Wookie has a dick. It's OK.
Dr, that would be considered cruel and unusual punishment ...however givin that its Zero, it would be deemed acceptible.
Hillary comes to mind. Or maybe Lois Lerner. Dianne Feinstein?
Cruel & Unusual punishment, but richly deserved...
>>bag of dicks
yeah, but... i have a hunch he would like that.
'Here, let me 'borrow some power', I'll give it right back I pinkie swear!'
Yea 220, 221, whatever it takes huh?
Want a beer?
It's 7 o'clock in the morning!!!
Scotch?
SCOTUS: Mr. President, we won't GIVE you full authority and power on immigration.
PREZ: Um, ah......then can I borrow it?
Reminds me of Kings of Comedy when one of the guys said "I can't pay it, but I can put a little bit on it".
Infuckincredible
It is not "totalitarian" for the executive and legistaltive branch to propose new laws to address new problems (or mistakes that the SCOTUS made). For example, Citizens United could be neutralized easily by congress and executive order, assuming the political will is there. Which is assuming a lot.
That fact that Viagra is covered by insurance but not contraceptives for women, is total bullshit.
Oh cry me a fucking river. Don't you realize that you pay for it regardless in the form of a higher premium? It amazes me that people can't figure this shit out.
I don't think viagra should be covered by insurance any more than rograine or hair dye should be covered by insurance.
edit: wait, so Obama wants women to have contraceptives covered so they won't have babies, and viagra is covered so women WILL have babies. Oh I see, they cancel each other out, got it.
Proposing new laws??
Who the hell is proposing new laws? This is pure executive action, out of thin air, with no legal authority behind it.
IM GOING TO SAY THIS TO YOU IN HOPES YOU CAN UNDERSTAND WHY THE OUTRAGE OVER EXCECUTIVE ORDERS MATTERS: Even if you are a big supporter of Obama you should still be terrified of the way he's acting. He won't be president forever. What if Jake And The Fat Man (Chris Christie and co.) win the Presidency in 2016 and start running shit by executive order, casting aside laws and things that YOU care about? You know the Fat Man ain't shy about hammering his rivals and groups that aren't in favor with him. Would you want him to have this same level of power but working AGAINST your personal desires? You would be on the other side of this issue so fast it wouldn't even be funny.
Even if you are a big supporter of Obama you should still be terrified of the way he's acting.
Couldn't have said it better myself. If I were American, I'd be shitting my pants now - or I'd be very, very mad.
Either way, this president with his contempt for trivialities such as the Constitution or the Supreme Court should be impeached. I'm really starting to think the USA is facing one of its moments of truth, just like it did in 1776, 1860 or 1941.
I'll give you a hint of where the danger lurks: Ermächtigungsgesetz, look it up to see what I mean.
No, wait, wait...
he'll cross that bridge when he gets to it!
LOL
http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/data/orders.php
Look at the numbers. Look at them. I will say nothing...
Just LOOK at them.
Touché. Your info is not exactly supporting my point of view, but it matters a great deal in discussions like these. Only question that remains is: is this merely a matter of numbers or should we also be talking about the content and nature of these different presidential executive orders? I suppose not all executive orders are equally important, right?
Limp dick syndrome is a medical condition...fucking anyone and getting pregnant is a choice. I think most would support a pill that made women aroused and lubricated if that was their "condition."
Also Viagra is presribed to women and men.
This opinion was sponsored by the "Two Wrongs Make it Right Club"
Yup.
I missed the part of the Constitution about "free" healthcare.
What school did you go to? Everyone knows it takes 10 wrongs to make a right.
"Citizens United could be neutralized easily by congress and executive order,"
I don't think you understand how Constitutional review works.
The SC indicated that the 1st amendment doesn't allow the government to fine or jail people for engaging in political speech, even if the person works for an incorporated entity, and even if the goal of the underlying law is to regulate campaign finance.
How in the fuck, do you think, that by "executive order" - the 1st amendment would allow the government to fine or jail documentary film makers again?
Do you have any idea, at all, about how the federal government is set up?
And the government isn't going around mandating insurers provide "free" Viagra, shithead.
No one is telling Sandra Fluke she can't have birth control. They're telling her that she has no right to demand a private, Catholic institution provide it, and no right to demand it be provided "for free" on the backs of other insureds.
"That fact that Viagra is covered by insurance but not contraceptives for women, is total bullshit."
That's because women get pregnant by themselves.
This has boiled down to a gender pissing contest when it's insurance & pharma that's jacked up the price for something that costs them pennies. Think minumun wage covers it?
BC $60-80 per mo
Viagra $25 per PILL
Unwanted children - 18 yr sentence.
Somebody didn't put down the Communist Manifesto long enough to watch Schoolhouse Rock.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tyeJ55o3El0
Apparently that's the one and actual definition of totalitarian.
Maybe you should try a dictionary.
Barry is going to get a smackdown if he acts on his own. Should be fun to watch.
Nope...not gonna happen. Barry is too black for a smackdown. Ask crybaby Boner.
you are an optimist...this fucker never seems to get smacked down by any man other than the wookie.
No smackdown for Barry. He has proven that he is above the law. He has played Congress and Americans like a fittle. His encore (I hope it doesn't go beyond this) is when he declares a refugee crisis...
I think you meant fiddle.
the pimp hand is strong with this one.
LOL fucking joke.
Laughingstock.
'Victory for religious freedom!'
Oh fuck off you fundamentalist ass hats, or I should say those politicians who need to pander to the nut crowd for votes.
One word... Impeach
Ain't gonna happen.
You have to get a 2/3rd majority of non-Democrats and non-RINOs in both houses of congress for that.
Sorry guys, impeachment woulda-shoulda happened a loooong time ago. We don't even know this asshole's real name. His social security number was originally issued to some guy in connecticut called Harrison J. Bounel. Mr. Bounel was registered as a resident at Mr. "Obama's" house in Chicago at one time.
Arrest this crook. Forget all this genteel "impeach" bullshit. the guy's a full-on criminal.
Sandy hook was a fraud, everyone knows it, this asshole is fully complicit. Arrest him.
So, if the law is unconstitutional, just make up a new law - that's what the president does, right? He hasn't actually dismissed the Supremes, just congress - that's not wrong, right? I was worried niitially that he overstepped, whew. His country, his law?
Free contraception for LGBT !
Libs are gonna buttfuck and abort each other out of existence. We're good.
Too optimistic.
Libtards don't breed. They recruit. That is why they are so hot on controlling education. Hitler taught them that one.
Executive order outlawing the supreme court, yes SEIG HAIL
"Having a phone and a pen, I realized we no longer need Congress or a Supreme Court. I have now issued an EO dissolving both Institutions. My EO also dissolves the Constitution."
Forward, Soviet!
Oh fuck why the hell not!
Oh look, the sock puppet wants to give orders; how cute.
He doesn't even realize that he will be the first to be put against the wall when he gets what he wants.
Stalin executed the hard line revolutionary communists first. They had a track record of successful revolt, so they needed to die.
more:
http://homment.com/yjJi9vUY3U
Really good find, thanks. I can't imagine that will be reported anywhere.
'Something that could possibly be wreckage of a plane'....ok well when that's verified, get back to us. Thousands of old plane and shipwrecks all over the oceans.
This battle was lost when they passed the ACA in the dark of night and when the SCOTUS authorized the mandate as a tax. We will be arguing over the minituae in perpetuity, blind to the fact that the war has long been lost. These pronouncements are just more ball-hiding and perspective-shifting.
"when the SCOTUS authorized the mandate as a tax"
Which, in reality,created a constitutions crisis since the power to declare a tax rests in the legislative branch.
Absolutely. The 4 "liberals" on the Court are pure totalitarian communists, so they will forever vote as a bloc. This is all on that Roberts idiot. He could have prevented all of this. Hope he rots in hell.
thamnosma,
Exactly right. Roberts was flipped; either he had skeletons in his closet, or they had something he was willing to sell out the Constitution to get. Maybe both: carrot and stick.
But there is no doubt, is there? Roberts was turned. There is no other credible explanation. He backstabbed the people and the Constitution. May he rot in the 9th Circle.
Roberts illegally adopted his two children. The kids are Irish, but were adopted out of South America. Ireland does not allow outside adoptions, and certainly doesn't allow children to be trafficked to South America and then adopted out.
A debate that will only occur in 8th grade civics class (if at all.) we have a majority population that does not care a lick about the Constitution, including our sitting President, a President that openly disdains the negative covenants contained therein. His concerns are now moot now that he has taken it upon himself to act extra-constituitionally.
In short, we are fucked.
wait, wutz a consertooshun?
Duz it have electrolytes?
I'm still of the mind that this thing can be repealed or will simply collapse of its own weight along with the rest of the financial mess. I will be, gasp, voting republican (yeah, both parties are the same, blah, bhal) in the faintest of hopes that both Deathcare and Open Borders can be stopped. If they win and don't do it, well, so be it. I'll at least have checked out that option.
In the end, only the government bond and debt bubble collapse will really put an end to all this, but we will all pay a price for it.
I do not share your optimism re repealing obamacare, but I won't deny you your hopes.
I would add a race war and civil war to your bond and debt collapse. I'm going to stop here as I am beginning to sound like Michael Snyder.
Race relations haven't been worse in recent memory. Sometime I think we are one urban incident away from disaster. I was living in Los Angeles during the Rodney King riots and experienced first hand how quickly "society" collapses. A matter of hours.
President stompy feet is going to issue another Kings order.
I now refer to him as the 'The Pen-yan Dictator' to piss off my Obie-loving cousins...if he doesn't like something he just writes an EO and they don't consider that dangerous.
Hey, there you go. I refer to him as the perverted homo asshole who has overthrown the US government.
Heads or Tails. Heads and I will submit my resignation in writing with my PEN. Tails and I will submit my resignation with my PHONE.
Just wait...the fun part of Ograbmecare hasn't even begun yet!
I'd be willing to pay for some birth control and ship it to those South and Central American countries that are flooding our borders with their brats.
We want American women to be on the pill, and then open the doors for all the other kids of the world.
We are being invaded, and no one even seems to give a damn.
Plenty of people give a damn here in Texas, i can assure you.
Just not enough of a damn to actually do something...
flooding our borders with their brats.
obie's importing them.
Soon it will be your children running for those countries, be careful what you ask for lest you face the same.
Please, please, Barry, go all out. Push the fucking limits. Take it over the edge. Do it.
welcome to the limit
Is that an 80s training montage song?
on more relevant news....NY FED just gave away $340 billion in reverse repos to friendly banks and money market funds to help them fudge their balance sheets and pretend that they don't hold garbabe on their books.
$340 billion. i predicted this number would reach $500 billion, we are getting there. there is no limit to the farse that is the NY FED.
We've lost all grasp of mark to market, at least for the oliqarchs
I love the smell of ass-handing in the morning.
If people can not be coerced into paying for things that are objectionable to their "sincerely held" religious beliefs then I would like to with hold at least a portion of my taxes which are used to support state sponsored gambling enterprises.
I have not figured out why all the Lesbians want free birth control???
Preventative cheap insurance for the deterance of ever bringing another mcshame, roberts, scalia, pelosi, reid, rove et. al. into this world.
The only employer who should feel any obligation to provide birth control to his employees is a brothel operator.
So who is on the hook for the whores in Congress? Reid and Boehner?
who said le roi c'est moi?
Impeach this mother fuck.
I don't understand how these types fall under health and safety since they don't prevent the spread of STDs? Only condoms help prevent STDs and unwanted pregnancies.
When Hobby Lobby can show where contraception is mentioned in the Bible, I'll consider their religious excuse for not providing contraception coverage.
Then there is rape, incest and all the other fun in the Bible. Fuck hobby lobby, fuck the supreme assholes.
In any large group of people there are bound to be assholes. The government's job on the behalf of the society is to say STFU.
Unfortunately the assholes have been given too much power. Now it is time for the majority to say to alito and scalia STFU
Hey bill, STFU.
Too funny...when you Democrats can show where Obama can force people to buy insurance in the constitution, I'll consider your communist idealism an excuse for your ignorance.
If you want to drive a car or own a home, you are forced to buy insurance. No one ever expressed outrage at the notion before Obamacare came along.
I have NEVER heard any organized opposition to compulsory auto or home insurance. Complaints, yes, everyone complains about it. But no one seriously suggests that people should have the right to opt out because you don't HAVE to own a home or drive a car, or that they have a good driving record, so shouldn't have to pay insurance premiums that cover damages for others.
They make these arguments about health insurance (Obamacare, to be specific). And those who say they shouldn't be forced to pay into a pool that covers other people's accidents and damages when it comes to healthcare would be to embarrassed to suggest they be allowed to drive without insurance, or decline homeowner's coverage while the mortgage company still has a financial interest in the home. It is understood that some things you do carry significant risks to others, those others are within their rights to ask for some kind of insurance from you.
And while you CAN choose not to drive or own a home and avoid the mandate, you CAN'T choose not to need medical care for the time you are alive. In life, EVERYBODY is a licensed driver, and EVERYBODY takes their car on the road every time they get out of bed in the morning.
"If you want to drive a car or own a home, you are forced to buy insurance. No one ever expressed outrage at the notion before Obamacare came along."
Let's set aside the fact that the federal government does not require anyone to buy home or auto insurance.
The reason you never heard most people complain about home and auto insurance is because most people understand that with car and home owner's insurance you are insuring risks to OTHER people and/or their property.
You can blame tort law for that, which makes us liable for harm we cause to others.
See how that works?
Maybe you guys don't consider having to pick up the tab for some uninsured person's medical care a "damage", but a lot of people would disagree.
If you want to chance it, fine. But if you DO get sick, you know damned well you will be able to access care...at someone ELSE'S expense. You know damned well that society will not just let you die.
If THAT isn't freeloading, I don't know what would be.
And those who say they shouldn't be forced to pay into a pool that covers other people's accidents and damages when it comes to healthcare would be to embarrassed to suggest they be allowed to drive without insurance, or decline homeowner's coverage while the mortgage company still has a financial interest in the home. It is understood that some things you do carry significant risks to others, those others are within their rights to ask for some kind of insurance from you.
Are you genuinely this stupid? You have to have car insurance to protect other drives from the very high possibility you will damage their car, not your own; as for a mortgage lender demanding you have insurance, that's to protect them in the case you default on the loan if your house burns down or gets sucked into a tornado.
But when you get ill, there are virtually no such negative externalities. Who suffers if you get ill and you don't have sickcare insurance? You and your loved ones do... and your creditors, if you have any. All people whose association with you is voluntary.
"Who suffers if you get ill and you don't have sickcare insurance? You and your loved ones do... and your creditors, if you have any."
And YOU call ME stupid?
WTF do you think you are to tell ANY business what they must spend their money on?
Exodus 21:22
If men strive, and hurt a woman with child, so that her fruit depart from her, and yet no mischief follow: he shall be surely punished
To me the argument is why Hobby Lobby has any right to control how their employees use their compensation from their work. Providing access to health care services is part of their pay, their compensation. They are free to use it, or not. Or to only use parts of it as needed. Hobby Lobby wasn't being asked to provide the actual birth control, they were being asked to provide OBGYN services that MAY have included birth control for some patients.
Those employees can still use part of their money wages to purchase the same thing. Or not. Hobby Lobby doesn't get approval-rights to their employees spending decisions. Again, it is THEIR compensation, THEY should decide how it is spent or used. Or not.
Should an employee have the right to withhold wages they suspect may be being used to buy illegal drugs? If an employer is anti-gun, can they insist that their employees not purchase weapons or ammo with their paycheck? Would they have a right to take punitive action against them if they do?
The religious excuse is bogus, this was about making a statement on birth control, not employers religious rights. The larger issue of how much control an employer HAS over his employees is more important to me. Can an employer exercise veto-power over how his employees spend their compensation, this ruling appears to open the door to saying yes, they do. And where does THAT end? The employer/employee relationship is being disrupted in so many ways these days, and the employee is getting the short end of the stick.
Insurance- To pay for unexpectd or unavoidable situations..
Paying for birth control should not even be covered by insurance.
Using insurance to subsidize ones prescription merely spreads the cost to those who do no use/need it.
Another kicker.. My wife a pharmacists, just filled a prescription for ADHD drugs for a 3 year old child. The doctor shoudl be barred and the mother wacked across the ass with a skinny stick a dozen times..
Uhmarikahns are fucked in the head, thinking pills are the answer.. Amazing how these disfucntions are so prevelant in the USA as compared to the rest of the world...
Your wife is a pharmacist, not a doctor. She has NO WAY of knowing why a particular drug is being prescribed to a particular patient. Hormonal agents, like most birth control medicine is, are prescribed for a variety of reasons having nothing to DO with contraception.
As for the 'ADD' drugs for a three-year old? Well, if it is being given for the wrong reasons, of course that would be wrong. But again, as a PHARMACIST, it isn't your wife's job to make that determination. What she CAN and should do is question whether this is the BEST drug for that patient, and to alert the doctor that there may be contraindications for such a young patient, see if something less potent can be substituted.
But if the drug hasn't been prescribed for typical ADD, but for some other reason entirely, it may BE the appropriate drug in that case. Then your wife's job is to FILL it.
As a nurse, I can tell you that the drugs used for ADD are often prescribed for other conditions like narcolepsy and other sleep disturbances. Birth control medicines are often given for endometriosis and other 'female' disorders, as well as for menopausal women having problems with the symptoms. In fact, ALL drugs have uses for things they were not specifically designed for...
Viagra began as a cardiac drug, a vaso-dilator that somebody discovered gave guys a woody. Do you really want to be explaining why your doctor ordered it to your pharmacist?
NOT one doctor on Earth can justify ADD drugs to a 3 year old. NOT ONE. They have NO beneficial effect for a 3 year old child no matter what the imagined off-label use. None.
you are one driven bot.
And what is a "driven bot"?
You want birth control???? Get a tattoo of Michele "wookie" Obama's face above ur pussy....and one on ur backside....
do you actually have a brain, or are all your brain cells in your asshole
So you would fuck michele?...you must be gay then
I thought Watts comment was original and entertaining
i've got a friend who thinks michelle is gorgeous. michelle is definitely not my thing, but to each his own.
If she didn't have such appalling taste in partners I might like her.
Or, if SilvertonguedAngel is to be believed, a gorilla.
Please explain why this plan would not work.
Keebler elves announce that they will use Moochelle's face as a mold for their new gorilla cookies...
Wait - so are we paying for condoms for ISIS or not, now?
Way to go Hobby Lobby. Thanks for fucking inflating the Presidental powers further.
I'm going to continue my lifetime boycott of Hobby Lobby, cause I never went there in the first place, but its the principle that matters.
And what principle is that?
Mob rules?
The walled speration that Jefferson was fond of is collapsing. Hobby Lobby is not a 501(c) so therefore they are not afforded the same leways for "religious reasons". Now if they change their tax code, then so be it.
Sure. As soon as Obama resigns for having the IRS harass TEA Party groups.
You cannot cry "rule of law" when your dolt of a leader is lawless.
And I'll go shop there for the first time!! I got yer boycott right here, skippy (points to groin area).
Make sure you get plenty of hobby glue, cause one can never have enough.
Clearly you're too stupid to read humor. Perhaps you should get a cherry coke and masturbate to pictures of Becky Quick.
Clearly you're too stupid to succesfully perform humor.
In order for someone to read humor, you must first write something humorous.
Get back to us after you double your IQ.
While I have no increased my overall fast food consumption (in fact it has been mitigated and never really was high to begin with) I have simply shifted that consumption to 100% in the direction of Chick-Fil-A.
Somebody's gotta have morals. Two things I've learned in my decade as an adult: Vote with your feet, and vote with your wallet!
Yea funy thing is that Hobby Lobby sucks anyway.
Joann's, Michales, AC Moore, Pearls are ALL much beter. I don't even know how Hobby Lobby is even around with all the much better competition in town. Now I have not looked at their financials, but my guess is that like everyone else they are borrowing lots of money using cheap easy money to build more and more useless stores that just canablize themselves and the other craft's stores.
Hobby Lobby is doomed and it has nothing do do with this ruling, they just simply suck as a retailer.
"WILL CONSIDER WHETHER PRESIDENT CAN ACT ON HIS OWN TO MITIGATE EFFECT OF SUPREME COURT RULING"
You ask if that is totalitarian. Well, if we were talking about Stalin, do you really think he'd be considering ways to mitigate the effects? A totalitarian President would nullify the ruling, not look for ways to deal with it.
And what IS the effect of this ruling? Women who work for Hobby Lobby are going to have a harder time obtaining birth control on their insurance plan than other women who don't work there. So, since HL's 'rights' were upheld, why would they or anyone else care if those women found a go-around? Would it be better to vow to fight the ruling to the death?
How is this totalitarian? Please explain how something like this leads to the gulag...
Go fuck yourself. If you can't manage to get fucking birth control in todays society you are a complete fucking moron. Your bullshit argument is BULLSHIT!
14 weeks, 4 days.
Nuff said...
If these women are too stupid to buy their own birth control, then they should be institutionalized, and not just given pills.
Nurse Ratchet can dispense birth control to them while they have their lunch in the profoundly retarded ward.
Correct, but if they want birth control then THEY can pay for it. How hard was that?
You could just read the decision and answer some of your questions yourself.
http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/13pdf/13-354_olp1.pdf
SCOTUS is clearly trying to backpedal from their original botched ruling that allowed 0-care in the first place.
But people won't forget. SCOTUS is just as responsible for 0-care as 0.
5-4 doesn;t sound like back peddlin' that much to me.
They were given the decision before they voted.
Brother O was responsible for Obamacare? I thought it was Pelosi (and a legion of HMO lawyers.)
Andrew Jackson provided the necessary precedent.
Jefferson was better at dealing with bad judges. He reorganized the federal courts, and hey, a bunch of Federal Party appointees suddenly didn't have positions.
Thanx for the good advice. When the TEA Party finally takes over, they can increase the size of the SCOTUS to 24, appoint 12 new constitutionalists, and change the appellate districts.
I think the Ninth Circuit should have its jurisdiction changed to just Johnston Atoll, for starters.
Gee! Two can play this shove the courts aside game!
Detecting a bit of a math problem here, but overall argument seems to be on the right track...
What, are we back to nine justices again? Derp. My bad.
I think the number has been changed by congress a couple times now. It was originally 12 before congress changed it to nine to avoid having the first President Johnson appoint three replacements after the civil war.
Still works out. Once the four retards retire, the number can be reset again.
The whole Jefferson vs. the courts thing was seriously amusing. Every time a Federalist judge tried to punish Burr for shooting their tin god Hamilton, that judge's district suddenly vanished. The SCOTUS upheld all of it, saying "he could do that to us as well".
Dupe
I like the fact the scales are falling from the eyes of the people. Can't say I'm upset with his attitude.
After all, he's NOT AN AMERCAN!
CAN YA HEAR ME NOW?
We have become a lawless nation. Stop feeding the beast!!! And if the tax man comes to the door, be ready with your lead-delivery system.
When the fuck are we going to say enough is enough?!?!
Total US Debt
http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/TCMDO ($59.398 T Exponential Growth, All Sectors; Credit Market Instruments; Liability, Level)
After the new iPhone comes out, Hollah!
All it will take in the United States is a "Reichstag Fire" incident as Cheney has recently predicted and you will get the totalitarian Fascist government that is already being planned by Obama and other criminal vermin.
...and then WE THE PEOPLE get to reciprocate!
"RECIPROCATE" = high velocity voting
DECAPITATE!