This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
Movement to Declassify 9/11 Information Gathers Momentum ... 9/11 Commission Chairs and Congressmen Call for Declassification
The 9/11 Commission Co-Chairs - Lee Hamilton and Thomas Kean - have called for the 28-page section of the 9/11 Commission Report which is classified to be declassified. Kean said that 60-70% of what was classified shouldn't have been classified in the first place:
Congressman Thomas Massie read the 28 classified pages of the Joint Intelligence Committee Inquiry into 9/11 (the joint Senate and House investigation into 9/11) and immediately called for them to be released to the public:
A bipartisan bill - introduced by congressmen Walter B. Jones (Republican from North Carolina) and Stephen Lynch (Democrat from Massachusetts) - would declassify the 28 pages of the Joint Inquiry which implicate the Saudi government.
Former Congressman Ron Paul is also demanding the 28 pages be declassified:
The Co-Chair of the congressional investigation into 9/11 - Bob Graham - and 9/11 Commissioner and former Senator Bob Kerrey are calling for either a “permanent 9/11 commission” or a new 9/11 investigation to get to the bottom of it.
Senator Graham has lobbied Obama for years to release the 28 pages and to reopen the investigation, but Obama has refused. The former Chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee and 9/11 investigator has even resorted to filing Freedom of Information requests to obtain information, but the Obama administration is still stonewalling:
Graham said that like the 28 pages in the 9/11 inquiry, the Sarasota case is being “covered up” by U.S. intelligence. Graham has been fighting to get the FBI to release the details of this investigation with Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests and litigation. But so far the bureau has stalled and stonewalled, he said.
And high-level former NSA official Thomas Drake provided testimony to the 9/11 investigations documenting that the "official story" of 9/11 makes little sense, as the intelligence agencies had all of the information they needed to stop it. Drake's testimony has - for no real reason - been classified. Drake is seeking to declassify his testimony to the 9/11 Commission:
I would argue for declassification and release because the 9/11 Commission asked for it in the public interest, my testimony was given to Congress via testimony (oral and written) to investigators as a material witness and whistleblower, because of NSA’s coverup of its accountability for 9/11, and the coverup committed by NSA to obstruct official Congressional investigations, plus declassification is timely in terms of ongoing efforts to reform NSA by Congress and the President.
I do know that my testimony and evidence was fully suppressed and censored as a deep state secret - so secret that it was not included in the classified report of the 9/11 Joint Inquiry.
Indeed, the 9/11 Commission admits that it never got all of the facts ... and many officials are eager to spill the beans about what they know.
Still Urgent Today
Ancient history, you say? Graham notes:
Although it's been more than a decade ago when this horrific event occurred, I think [the questions of who supported the attacks] have real consequences to U.S. actions today.
As Graham told PBS:
We need to have this information now because it’s relevant to the threat that the people of the United States are facing today.
Postscript: People may not remember now, but – at the time – the supposed Iraqi state sponsorship of 9/11 was at least as important a justification for the Iraq war as the alleged weapons of mass destruction. This claim that Iraq is linked to 9/11 has since been debunked by the 9/11 Commission, top government officials, and even – long after they alleged such a link – Bush and Cheney themselves.
But 70% of the American public believed it at the time, and 85% of U.S. troops believed the U.S. mission in Iraq was "to retaliate for Saddam's role in the 9-11 attacks."
Only last year, John Glaser noted:
Significant portions of Americans still believe that Saddam and al-Qaeda were in cahoots and cooperated in the 9/11 attacks. The reason is simple: the administration told them this lie.
An investigation by a committee in the House of Representatives in 2004 identified “237 misleading statements about the threat posed by Iraq that were made by President Bush, Vice President Cheney, Secretary Rumsfeld, Secretary Powell, and National Security Advisor Rice. These statements were made in 125 separate appearances, consisting of 40 speeches, 26 press conferences and briefings, 53 interviews, 4 written statements, and 2 congressional testimonies.”
According to the committee, at least 61 separate statements “misrepresented Iraq’s ties to al-Qaeda.” A Senate investigation in 2006 also covered these lies.
Keeping this lie afloat took some work. The Bush administration, primarily Dick Cheney and Don Rumsfeld, “applied relentless pressure on interrogators to use harsh methods on detainees in part to find evidence of cooperation between al Qaida and the late Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein’s regime,” McClatchy reported in 2009.
According to Lawrence Wilkerson, chief of staff to Bush’s Secretary of State Powell, “the administration authorized harsh interrogation” in 2002, and “its principal priority for intelligence was not aimed at pre-empting another terrorist attack on the U.S. but discovering a smoking gun linking Iraq and al-Qa’ida.”
Wilkerson is right.
In other words, the failure to conduct a real 9/11 investigation contributed to the Iraq war, torture, and the failure to fix fundamental weaknesses in - and threats to - America's national security.
»
- advertisements -
<<<<<<WTC 7 was sliced nearly in half by falling WTC 1 perimeter wall (documented fact), and it fell over in two directions, >>>>>>
hahahahahahahahaha nice one
Good thread here on views of the south side of WTC7 (particularly @ April 2, 2011 in the thread to the bottom) where the focus is on the missing spandrel beam between columns 19 and 20 in the building.
http://the911forum.freeforums.org/wtc-7-south-side-views-t203.html#p15055
Note: this beam appears to be uniformly and symmetrically missing from all 47 floors prior to the building's collapse and subsequent to the debris fall from the collapse of WTC1. We are expected to believe debris fall from the Twin Towers would cause this type of surgical destruction to WTC7?
If a controlled demolition scenario is considered then this pattern of destruction would be consistent with a pre-mature detonation of charges in that one specific portion of the building.
It is fact...one the AE proponents refuse to look at.
the fact is you are ass fucked. And quite able to type accurately with a cock in your mouth apparently.
Thanks to advances in medical technology, Lee and Tom realized they might live long enough to be hung by the neck until dead.
I think a lot of people woke up after seeing "Hunt The Boeing" and
The Amazing Pentalawn. Black humor vs The Crime of The NEW Century
And then Loose Change woke up younger people.
Introducing the amazing new Penta-Lawn 2000!The subject of the 28 pages is no secret:
9/11 Link To Saudi Arabia Is Topic Of 28 Redacted Pages In Government Report; Congressmen Push For Release
By Jamie Reno on December 09 2013 2:09 PM
Excerpt:
Former Sen. Bob Graham, D-Fla., who chaired the Joint Inquiry in 2002 and has been beating the drum for more disclosure about 9/11 since then, has never understood why the 28 pages were redacted. Graham told IBTimes that based on his involvement in the investigation and on the now-classified information in the document that his committee produced, he is convinced that “the Saudi government without question was supporting the hijackers who lived in San Diego…. You can't have 19 people living in the United States for, in some cases, almost two years, taking flight lessons and other preparations, without someone paying for it. But I think it goes much broader than that. The agencies from CIA and FBI have suppressed that information so American people don't have the facts."
Jones insists that releasing the 28 secret pages would not violate national security.
“It does not deal with national security per se; it is more about relationships,” he said. “The information is critical to our foreign policy moving forward and should thus be available to the American people. If the 9/11 hijackers had outside help – particularly from one or more foreign governments – the press and the public have a right to know what our government has or has not done to bring justice to the perpetrators."
As soon as the Saudis are implicated, it in turn implicates the Bush administration for approving the flights out of the country.
I don't see how they can manage to implicate the Saudis without opening a serious can of worms for themselves. Thus, I can't see this as being a desired part of any conspiratorial playbook.
The corporate controlled press will never cover this issue in earnest and I predict that we will see them attempt to ignore the issue going forward, which is pretty much what they have been doing all along.
I can't help but think this is part of the effort by the US and Israhell to complete the Project for a New American Century by attacking Saudi Arabia. One for the oil and the other for greater Israhell.
"Former Sen. Bob Graham, D-Fla.... has never understood why the 28 pages were redacted."
Oh, I think he understands why. It would disrupt the almighty petro-dollar if the world realized the Saudis had anything to do with 9/11/01.
But 70% of the American public believed it at the time, and 85% of U.S. troops believed the U.S. mission in Iraq was "to retaliate for Saddam's role in the 9-11 attacks."
Thus, 70% of the public were propagandized fools while 85% of the troops were.
Significant portions of Americans still believe that Saddam and al-Qaeda were in cahoots and cooperated in the 9/11 attacks. The reason is simple: the administration told them this lie.
No, the reason is simpler: no due diligence on the part of the American public prior to ranting for war, idiots who trust their government to tell the truth and make no effort to fact check. How's that turned out in Iraq? Afghanistan after we leave? How much mostly borrowed money spent or to be spent? $3 trillion? How many lives? What a bargain.
People deserve the governments they ignorantly elect.
"...the reason is simpler: no due diligence on the part of the American public prior to ranting for war..."
Due diligence? Ranting? Winston, go back and reread the book you took your name from. Consider how we live in a house of smoke and mirrors. How many hours a day is the average American, struggling to survive, supposed to take prowling the Internet? Who was ranting? Was the public ranting for war real or a media illusion? How can there be real public dialogue when the media has us embroiled in a great largely imaginary debate designed to keep us unable to talk politics without shouting?
Last night I looked in on my roommate watching TV. There was a debate that went on for an hour over whether 9 year olds should be trained in the use of Uzis. Really. Do you want 9 year olds walking around with Uzis vs. Do you want the 9 year old with the Uzi to know what she's doing. How do you not bite? But hardly a word about the real struggles we face and the world events that are shaping them.
The introduction of Network Radio, and even more so Network Television, marked a sharp break in our direct relationship to reality and our ability to take information from multiple sources and synthesize it into our own picture of what must have happened. They hijacked our "seeing is believing" defense, and any selected or staged image we all saw on TV came to stand for reality.
The next line of defense they hijacked was community agreement, once reached through discussions at diners, on the street and in lunch rooms. With TV they created an imaginary and fully controlled "community agreement" and got us all to support it to be able to continue fitting in.
Another great accomplishment of the media is to get us - all of us - engaged in blaming "all those people out there" - each other - who supposedly believe their drivel. Every time we blame the sorry state of affairs on "those stupid people" out there, we play into their hands.
I was reflecting on this yesterday after a younger man asked wistfully how wonderful it must have been growing up in the '50's. It was in a way a golden era, with America fattening on the ruins of the rest of the world and the dollar the undisputed king. But it also saw the first full blossoming of synthetic culture, complete with synthetic "popular music" and the onset of the disappearance from our public spaces - and our music, remember "payola" anyone? - of real public airing of big and painful issues.
We didn't do this to ourselves.
By the way, what are you doing about breaching the media bubble in your own communities? We're not going to get anywhere if we hide out and only share our real thoughts with those who already agree with us or when it's safe.
"If we understand the mechanism and motives of the group mind, is it not possible to control and regiment the masses according to our will without their knowing about it?"
"The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. ...We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of. This is a logical result of the way in which our democratic society is organized."
Edward L. Bernays
1 Wall Street
New York City
Edward L. Bernays
7 Lowell St.
Cambridge, Mass.
He was descended from the Chief Rabbi of Hamburg (late 18th-early 19th century) and was a nephew of Sigmund "We're bringing them the plague" Freud.
Elaborate way of explaining the Art of PsyOp.
"People deserve the governments they ignorantly elect." Like the whack-a-mole contest between the two dominant political parties
A 28 page "document release" is yet another misdirection, which of course will still not mention WTC7, the Israeli/Mossad connection, US Military involvement, or show who knew about this beforehand and made money with their puts.
SO, why now? Pretty obvious to me...
1) The US Deep State has realized that they have overplayed their false flag strategy, and doubts about 9/11 are building up among the sheep, so their NEW false flag won't be as effective and may even backfire against them.
2) Among us sheep, some have already looked up from grazing and have noticed that 9/11 was pulled off by a malevolent police state which is not doing things in our interest (surprise, surprise!). Another group of sheep are right on the borderline of realizing there is a problem with the 9/11 narrative, but are still on the fence as to what actually happened, and worse, what it implies about their comfortable view of the world.
SO, it would seem to me that this (so far) trial balloon is meant to recover some credibility among the weaker minded sheep who still are conscious enough to feel vaguely uncomfortable with the official 9/11 story. Once first alternate scapegoat "another group of Saudis " (as opposed to scapegoat #1 CIA's favorite Saudi Tim Osman) is officially fingered, then the weaker minded sheep will cling to the new narrative: "whew, that answers my vague feeling of discomfort that something is wrong - now I can go back to grazing!"
That TPTB would have the temerity to try to do whitewash #2 on 9/11 is at least as evil as when they did whitewash #1. But, the added bonus for TPTB of course, is they get to use whitewash #2 to point the finger at whoever isn't following todays NWO script, or is no longer useful to the agenda.
Perhaps Saudi oil really *has* all run out!
PS As for "mini nukes" doing the controlled 9/11 demolition of WTC1, WTC2, and WTC7, that is more misdirection. Why not aliens? I'm good friends who is a top ranked chemist and he assures me that burning metal beams can be accomplished *much* more easily than you think, which is confirmed in my mind at least with the YouTUbe videos that demonstrate how it is done...
Yeah the mini-nuke theory has always seemed hairbrained to me. One supposes they were going for a controlled demolition not outright destruction. Nevermind the difficulty of procuring, moving, and using such a device without causing any suspicion. Conventional methods would have worked and been much easier to carry off without undue attention.
"Here, we need your crew to install these new "cables" on all the vertical beams on this floor. Be careful not to break them - they are kind of soft. They will be used to measure "sway" or some other thing".
The guys doing the work might not have even known what they were doing. I wonder how many have died in single car accidents and the like since then.
Amen flap doodle! Well summed up. Total misdirection as too many sheep are looking up. Too few too late however I feel.
GW. I am surprised you did not say this !
))))))In other words, the failure to conduct a real 9/11 investigation contributed to the Iraq war, torture, and the failure to fix fundamental weaknesses in - and threats to - America's national security.(((((((
No, in other words, we failed to conduct a "real" investigation into 9/11 as it would have revealed all the evil and rot that planned this attack. We would have not been able to pull off our NWO agenda had we exposed the truth. We never EVER planned to investigate anything other than "offical narritive".
These killers who planned this actually think that they are doing a greater good btw by pulling off these 9/11 types events. No different ( in their minds) than sending 3,000 soldiers over a hill with guns to " take that mountain "
No. Not same. 3,000 soldiers have theoretical chance to take mountain and survive or just say screw you and not go at all.
Is more like shooting 3,000 soldiers to inspire 300,000 soldiers to take mountain.
Is better to have soldier named Mohammed. Then mountain can take self to him and problem solved.
Any sort of "controlled demolition" of WTC 1, 2, and 7, is misdirection. There is no evidence to support it. There are tons and tons of evidence available yet today for study, and every bit of it shows the buildings all broke apart at their connections.
Which agency do you work for?
This is the most amazing footage I have seen of "ground zero"... a 1,300 foot tall building turns into a hole in the ground.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JfoGxD8g_U
"Any sort of "controlled demolition" of WTC 1, 2, and 7, is misdirection. There is no evidence to support it."
Correct, there is no evidence to support it.
Correct, there is no evidence to support it.
So, we should believe that it's merely a coincidence that the company that was paid over $1 billion to clean up the wreckage of the Twin Towers just happens to be called Controlled Demolition Inc?
By the way, Controlled Demolition Inc. holds the world's record for demolishing the tallest manmade structure:
http://www.controlled-demolition.com/world-records
Actually, WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 did not "break apart". They fell within their own footprint, which is what happens with controlled demolitions. Hundreds of professional architects and demolition experts have gone on record about this...
Sorry, the US Deep State narrative just won't hack it anymore - the cat is out of the bag.
"Actually, WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 did not "break apart". They fell within their own footprint, which is what happens with controlled demolitions."
They collapsed, thus they did break apart. Debris was all over the place, inside and outside the footprints. What happens in a controlled demolition was irrelevant, as there were no demolition exposions immediately prior to the collapse of the Towers. Look at any video of a controlled demolition and you can see the demo explosions. There were no such explosions seen in the collpase of the World Trade buildings.
Collapsing in a footprint is not proof of anything, as gravity pulls downward, regardless of the reason for a collapse.
Stop, collaborate, and listen.
Listen to any video of 9/11 towers falling and you will hear the charges going off. They would have been set on the interior of the building and yes, if you look, you can see them too.
You are getting paid to spew these lies. You better hope your employer never sees you as expendable like the 3,000 people they murdered on 9/11. They will slit your throat for a dollar. Wake up Jack.
" Look at any video of a controlled demolition and you can see the demo explosions. There were no such explosions seen in the collpase of the World Trade buildings. "
How do you know about that exactly ?
Don't you know the structure of WTC1 ,2 and 7 ? Haven't you heard about the INNER support columns ?
You definitely can put a fair amount of explosives, particularly of the type developped by the Lawrence Livermore lab (military grade nanothermite in solutions) , that can destroy building "discreetly" .
But, just in case, I invite you to read some testimony about firemen who clearly heard explosions.
" Look at any video of a controlled demolition and you can see the demo explosions. There were no such explosions seen in the collpase of the World Trade buildings. "
"How do you know about that exactly ?
Don't you know the structure of WTC1 ,2 and 7 ? Haven't you heard about the INNER support columns ?"
So? There was no physical forensic evidence of any damage having been caused by demo charges. That is the problem with the demo story.
"It looks like a demo", is not proof of anything.
More lies. There are pictures of cut support columns - all done nice and neat. There is audio of the explosions. There is video of the poofs from the explosions. There are eye witness reports of the explosions.
All we need to know is who is paying you for this crap work you are doing. No doubt our taxdollars are paying your salary and we deserve to know which agency is wasting them on this bs approach you are using. Someone needs to be held responsible.
Who is it?
" There are pictures of cut support columns - all done nice and neat. "
Yes, and cut at some very convenient, and definitely improbable angle .... so when you see several columns like this, not only one, you know there is something strange.
" So? There was no physical forensic evidence of any damage having been caused by demo charges. "
More exactly nothing was made to explore the possibility of explosives. So, of course, when you are paid to not look for forensic evidence ....
even when professional firefighters can testify they heard explosions.
Sorry, but no, they did not fall within their footprints.
The cognitive dissonance among controlled demolition believers is mind boggling.
Ask those "professional architects and engineers" for some hard structural evidence to support their claims. All they will do is hem and haw and divert, because they don't have any.
Please do explain how jet fuel, which burns below the temp needed to melt the steel could have melted the steel so long after the jet fuel was already burned away.
Oh, and how much are they paying you for this crap you are putting down all over our yard?
"Sorry, but no, they did not fall within their footprints."
Gonna go with my lying eyes on that one.
Baghdad bob, is that you?
"Baghdad bob, is that you?"
The top 30 floors of World Trade 2 tipped over to the east, as the collapse began. Tipping puts it outside the footprint.
most of the building turned to dust... pretty incredible how some jet fuel and box cutters did that...
"most of the building turned to dust... pretty incredible how some jet fuel and box cutters did that... "
Are you going to be on stage at The comedy Club tonight?
It is not incredible that fire retardant is sprayed on structural steel, to attempt to protect the steel from the effect of heat from an office fire. It is not incredible that the flaming jet fuel started office combustible fires, which roared out windows from floor to ceiling and beyond.
If most of the building turned to dust, where did that pile of steel come from?
You are currently killing the record for most down votes. Continue sir!
Moneybots, tell your handlers that this isn't going well and that ZH readers are too well informed for their normal disinfo package.
"Moneybots, tell your handlers that this isn't going well and that ZH readers are too well informed for their normal disinfo package."
How long did it take you to dream up that fantasy?
The secret is to tell mostly the truth with just a little bit of lie in it. The lie then has a chance of slipping past.
The old soviet tactic of using mostly lie with a kernel of truth doesn't work with people who think.
I think you should be fired from this job. You suck at it.
Actually, they did fall in their own footprints (in particular WTC7 that didn't have the added stress of an aircraft strike to compound the controlled demolition). Hundreds of Architects and Demolition experts have gone on record about 9/11. Google it...
The US Deep State narrative is starting to unravel.
Time for you to go back to your daytime job of bombing Ukrainian and Gaza civilians with white phosphorus...
"Actually, they did fall in their own footprints (in particular WTC7 that didn't have the added stress of an aircraft strike to compound the controlled demolition)."
There was no controlled demolition to compound. The top 30 floors of World Trade 2 tipped over to the east as the collapse began, putting it outside of its footprint.
Fall in it's footprint is a meaningless comment as gravity pulls straight down.
Everything moneybots & sosoome know about the 9/11 in under 5 minutes.
http://www.corbettreport.com/911-a-conspiracy-theory/
Both are Tools from the Jim Quinn School of 9/11MORONS.
"Everything moneybots & sosoome know about the 9/11 in under 5 minutes.
http://www.corbettreport.com/911-a-conspiracy-theory/
Both are Tools from the Jim Quinn School of 9/11MORONS."
So many comedians.
You guys are almost as funny as this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=imWlSMgMFGE
Don't you have a BBQ to get drunk and abnoxious at? Alienate the last few friends (on payroll) that you have left?
And at least one mentally retarded state department troll. Has it gotten so bad that you are recruited out of high school special needs departments now? Hot damn J-TRIG/GCHQ has reached new lows. Science, learn it, unless you can't, then dont.