This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
9/11 - The Ultimate Litmus Test
9/11 - The Ultimate Litmus Test
By
Cognitive Dissonance
You will always find original articles by Cognitive Dissonance and other authors first on www.TwoIceFloes.com before they are posted here on ZH. Stop by and take a look. If you wish to subscribe to ‘Dispatches’, a periodic newsletter from Cognitive Dissonance and TwoIceFloes Creations, please click here.
Thirteen years ago the world changed; though it is only with the benefit of perspective may we clearly see the extent and duration of that change. But change it did and remarkably so after perspective is found and the world is seen for what it really is rather than what we are told it is - or what we want it to be based upon our own cultural conditioning and personally biased worldview.
This is not to say I see clearly, that I possess an unbiased mind, special insight or clarity of vision. Far from it in fact. On a daily basis I fight the tendency to develop a rigid mindset and view the world through that comforting lens. To help me resist this temptation I must constantly remind myself a static world view often results from my need to feel I can understand and control what is at times incomprehensible and most certainly uncontrollable. I have learned from personal experience the more I feel out of control the more I will try to exert control. It is a battle I will lose every time if I engage.
There is so much intentionally created confusion and misinformation out there that anyone claiming to know exactly what is going on is either tragically self deluded and living in a fantasy world, ideologically deaf, dumb and blind or a misinformation agent attempting to muddy the waters some more. I am not sure if anyone knows our true history anymore, including those entities busy rewriting it at this very moment.
That said, a huge and tragic mistake made by nearly all of us (not just the mainstream media contrarians reading this) is to assume we must have in place a complete and detailed historical narrative, including names, confessions and the smoking gun, before we discard the previous one, particularly if the one being discarded is ‘official’. This is of course a ridiculous requirement since from a logic and common sense point of view one is not required to know what is right in order to declare something wrong.
This incredibly effective controlling mind meme has become so thoroughly embedded within the collective consciousness that even so-called critical thinkers repeat this demand of anyone approaching them to request they re-examine their beliefs and consider alternatives. I am speaking directly to you and me, the alternative media reader here. This is a demand I might add we would unilaterally reject as preposterous if applied to our own ‘profession’, but which we gratefully embrace when protecting our cherished belief systems regardless of whether it is the official narrative or a contrary point of view. At times we are all trapped by our rigid thinking.
Even those who have rejected the official historical account of > fill in the blank < as balderdash are often quick to offer up an alternative thesis lest they be perceived as less than credible, competent or even (perish the thought) a conspiracy theorist. This is greatest mind killing, thought stopping epitaph ever created by the thought control police since accusations of witches, warlocks and devil worshipers were used to control dissenting thought. Regardless of your mind set one must admit this is brilliantly applied mind control technique via co-opted language and the hive mind. Score one to the CIA for that little gem.
The fact is liars lie and those who profit from lying, and by profit I don’t mean exclusively financial, will lie until the cows come home and “We the People” are pacified (or at least mentally, physically and emotionally disarmed) once again. Thus it fascinates me to no end how in one breath someone will declare all politicians and government officials are liars and corrupt, and in the next vigorously defend what ‘their’ lying politician and authority has claimed is the God’s Honest Truth and the ‘official’ story. And with a pinky swear no less.
“That’s my story and I’m sticking to it…..until I claim to have misspoken and we start all over again.”
Of course this almost always applies to the really big lies, the ones everyone can comfortably believe since no one would ever tell a whopper like that. After all, we can bitch and complain all we want about the effects of the corrupt system, but we must never fully question the very basis of the corrupt system itself for this will force us to question ourselves and our part in the charade. Careful we don’t bite the hand that feeds us……even if what we feed upon are ‘just’ yummy emotional security tidbits and a ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ affirmation of what is ‘normal’……so long as we don’t look beyond the paper thin veneer.
This neurosis of ours is skillfully played to the hilt, both by those who lie to us and by those who wish to be lied to. Truth be told we all enjoy a comforting lie now and then, just as long as it fits reasonably well within our overall worldview and inner narrative. In this way we are able to have our cake and eat it too, to both believe the (big) lie while not really believing (all of) it. Just don’t look too closely at the glaring conflicts and omissions in the official and alternative narratives, while at the same time looking just close enough to substitute in something that better fits into our own personal and infinitely customizable view of the world.

Which brings me to the subject of this article, “9/11 – The Ultimate Litmus Test”. Let me declare upfront that I ‘know’ two things with an extremely high degree of certainty about 9/11.
Number one, I have no idea exactly what happened on that brilliantly blue second Tuesday in September, let alone who and what was behind the event. And anyone who says they do is either blinded by their ideology, full of self deluded bullshit, or the mastermind of the entire operation. Please note I said EXACTLY. I know a lot about 9/11 and that is the problem. What I think I know is far greater than what I actually ‘know’. With that in mind I try to remind myself I have just enough information to make me dangerous to myself and no one else.
I am very comfortable stating for the record I ‘know’ almost nothing with absolute certainty about 9/11 and much of what I suspect happened on that beautiful fall day is little more than opinion and supposition. The only (slight) advantage I may have over many others when considering this subject is I wasn’t as deeply imprinted psychologically that morning/day because I was recovering from emergency surgery the night before and was enjoying the sweet bliss of a doctor prescribed morphine drip.
It was truly remarkable and quite surreal watching huge buildings disintegrate into dust with no emotional involvement or investment on my part. I know I upset several traumatized nurses and doctors that morning with my unsympathetic appraisal of the unfolding Psyops. Even in my drugged state I could recognize a con when it was being foisted upon us. But knowing something is a con and knowing how the con is run and who and what are behind it are two very different balls of tangled yarn.
It is the ultimate of egoic arrogance and hubris, which itself often carefully conceals our fear and emotional insecurity, for anyone to declare they ‘know’ who, what, when, where and why when in fact most of what they ‘know’ is at best supposition, hypothesis and logic based guessing. Naturally most of us get around this by asserting we ‘know’ most of what happened and would know all if only those dirty rotten bastards would come clean and spill the beans.
It is one thing to point out logical inconsistencies, outright contradictions and false statements in the official narrative, not to mention deliberate omissions and the obscuring of information. It is another entirely to state unequivocally ‘we’ know this or that, then point to the problems within the official narrative as ‘proof’ we are correct.
This speaks directly to the neurotic need of so many contrarians (that means you and me dear reader) to present an alternative explanation to replace the one we reject in order to appear credible. Why in the world are ‘we’ so worried about appearing credible to those who have no intention of believing anything other than what they wish to believe? And yet ‘we’ do.
Number two, the official 9/11 cover story stinks worse than two week old fish in August and is so full of holes it contains no substantial factual ‘truth’ to speak of other than bits and pieces here and there held together with baling wire and chewing gum. This is not to say there is no ‘truth’ (maybe I should say ‘fact’ since truth is often subjective) in the story.
Any competent liar will insistent a critical ingredient when concocting a successful (read plausible) lie is to mix just enough truth, especially self damaging truth, into the fetid cesspool of deception, deceit and duplicity. The best ‘genuine imitation’ stew is the one that contains a little real beef mixed in with the chunks of mystery meat and salmonella.
The ‘official’ 9/11 cover story is so full of crap the smell test alone is the early warning sign to fumigate and then repeatedly flush while hoping the septic tank or municipal sewer system can handle the mess without backing up. However the brilliance behind this treachery IS the cover story, as is the case with all reasonably well executed cover stories regardless of how transparent it might be. Enough ‘truth’, omission, scapegoats, blind alleys, false leads, backtracking and ideological red herrings has been seeded into the official cover-up to keep EVERYONE on both sides of the aisle endlessly chasing their tails. A true one-size-fits-all disinformation narrative if ever there was one.

For those who don’t wish to acknowledge the extremely uncomfortable truth they are sleeping with the enemy (meaning the mainstream media mesmerized) there are just enough self damaging ‘facts’ mixed into the official stew to ‘allow’ them to believe any variety of alternative narratives that point towards governmental/military incompetence, bald faced greed and self dealing, cover-your-ass bureaucratic backpedaling, terrorist ‘bad’ guys who hate-us-for-our-freedom let-me-sleep-like-a-baby ‘beliefs’.
Just as long as ‘we’ are given whatever it takes to avoid looking too closely into the black abyss and seeing ‘us’ for what ‘we’, as well as those formerly and presently in power, really are. After all I can call my wife a whore or my government a killer of its own citizens, but if you say that…well, them thar is fighting words.
Then there is the so called alternative point of view championed by a witch’s brew of dissenting, disaffected and downright angry individuals and small groups who, sadly and unfortunately, have been thoroughly infiltrated and mostly disarmed by the grand keepers of The Big Lie.
That neurotic impulse previously mentioned, of the need to present a complete and plausible alternative explanation when rejecting the official narrative, is expertly used to leverage every possible alternative account regardless of how plausible, or not, it may be. So long as everyone is going nowhere we can spin our wheels to our hearts content while the Grand Parade marches on. Lots of smoke, but no fire, is the objective of the disruptors and disinformation peddlers.
Not only does this keep the minions busy fighting among themselves, but anyone on the outside brave enough to fight back their inner fear of leaving the Matrix and taking a peek inside the alternative reality world is quickly spooked back to dry land by the absolute insanity and brutality of the alternative blogosphere. This is as much by design as by happenstance. Some people are truly just trolls and some are agents of the system hired to send the rabbits out of their holes and into the waiting arms of the existing insane asylum. And sadly some just follow the leader troll and act out their inner aggressions.
Somewhere in the middle of the true crazies screaming bloody murder, the misinformation agents acting out their roles as either crazies or ‘experts’ (and sometimes both), the mostly well intentioned individuals just seeking to find some answers amongst the deafening roar, and the vast silent majority of the minority, those who are truly frightened and confused and who just want the insanity to go away so they can go back to some sort of peaceful sleep, lay the ‘truth’ - slowly being starved to death for lack of nutrition and nurturing by all parties involved.
Contrary to the alternative universe crowd’s present day self image, the desire to go back to sleep seems to be the case for a large and growing population of frightened angry people who are skillfully manipulated, or at least herded, into self destructive actions, self defeating chest beating and righteously indignant late night screaming by way of blogging and posting passionate diatribes via the Interwebby – on occasion this author included.
Mission accomplished as far as the controllers are concerned. Better to have the disaffected corralled in the cattle shoot snipping at one another rather than out in the streets directly confronting authority or taking incremental steps towards slowly withdrawing from the enslaving system. Impossible you say? These human psychological bomb defusing and disposal techniques are older than Jesus Christ himself, stretching back to well before the Roman Empire. All the way back in fact to the Egyptian pharaohs.
[On a side note a totally fascinating and somewhat well documented theory posits that Christianity was created and/or hijacked by the Romans to counter and defuse what was at the time a militantly violent and revolutionary Jewish religion bent on the overthrow and destruction of the Roman Empire in what we today call the Middle East.
Have you ever seriously considered why the Old Testament is so militant and violent while the New Testament is essentially passive? Or pondered why the Jewish faith does not accept the New Testament? Talk about hijacked; if even slightly true, consider the similarities between this theory and what is happening within and to the Muslim religion today by forces outside and within that faith.]
Remarkably, while ‘our’ recorded history has been repeatedly distorted, re-written and omitted time after time, the distortion techniques used are all very well documented and displayed in plain sight for all who are not ideologically blind to see. In my opinion this is a not-so-subtle middle finger to those who claim to be right minded and on the side of truth and justice for all. Essentially we are being told, “This is what we do and how we do it. Whatcha gonna do about it fool?”
How do you defeat someone or something much larger than you? Ask any martial arts or military strategy expert and they will tell you the secret to their universe in a few choice words………deception and leverage. Instead of acting to protect ourselves from the predators who use these techniques against ‘us’, we enable them by destroying ourselves and those around us. Just spend a little time studying some recent history from the 60’s, 70’s and 80’s for some examples of self destruction, though I suggest you stay away from the official cover stories endlessly repeated via history textbooks and encyclopedias.
Have you ever wondered what happened to the various ‘popular’ movements and uprisings of those three decades? Again and again and again agents acting in the interest of the power elite and status quo infiltrated anything perceived to be a threat in order to sidetrack, dissolve or outright control any and all ‘subversive’ groups using polarizing techniques that are timeless in their effectiveness and efficiency.
There is only one rule to follow for all centers of power and that is to protect and preserve that power. This applies whether the power resides in governments, (central) banks, corporations, kings, pharaohs or Caesars all the way down to petty school yard bullies and megalomaniac Wal-Mart assistant managers.
If it is newly consolidated power acquired with the ‘consent’ of the people then initially those catered to will be “We the People”. But over time, as the absolute power corrupts absolutely, the fastest and easiest way to remain on top is through increasingly more widespread corruption via confiscating the wealth of the people and then spreading it among those few elite most able and available to assist in the maintenance of that power. Thus corruption spreads and infects everyone including “We the People” who in many cases must resort to these same methods in order to survive within the insanity. Either we become the mob or we die by the mob.
While anything goes in the pursuit of this goal, towards the end of Empire (regardless of the size of that empire) increasingly more ruthless and ‘efficient’ methods are employed to control the herd as the facade that originally kept “We the People” sedated and sated, or at least at bay, dissolves into an orgy of excess and opulence for those who ‘have’ and oppressive drugged drudgery for those who have not, all while “We the People’s” remaining money and wealth are debased and destroyed.
Actually I misspoke at the top of this article (to use that wonderful Newspeak term politicians love to use when backtracking in a hurry) when I said the world changed back on September 11, 2001. What changed was our perception, our worldview, in what was the largest real time experiment in mass hypnosis and perception management ever attempted in order to justify what was already in the works. Problem…Reaction…Solution in all its ugly glory writ large, live and in living color on nearly every TeeVee in the world.
Just because we were witness to such monstrous depravity as to curdle mother’s milk in situ doesn’t mean we cannot sit back and admire the craftsmanship and chutzpah, the grand illusion both as it unfolded and afterward, as it roiled and regurgitated in the world’s gut like a half digested Thanksgiving feast with no bicarbonate in sight.
One must vigorously applaud the spectacle of being told in real time to ignore our lying eyes and ‘believe’ what we are being told, then over the following months and years to backtrack, misspeak, re-speak, doublespeak and un-speak as the initial lie is reformed, refined and rammed up our butts ever deeper, all while we beg for more while cowering from the ghosts of terrorists past, present and future.
It was and remains a masterful job, simply masterful, despite its glaring and painfully obvious miscues, screw-ups and blatant public perception manipulation. If nothing else we have learned it doesn’t matter how obvious the lie is if people don’t want to know the truth. “Tell me another lie Dad so I can believe it’s the truth. Everything is gonna be OK, right?”

So exactly what is this litmus test I’m talking about and how does it apply to you and me. Well, it depends upon who ‘you’ are. I have repeatedly stated that what is not said is often far more important then what is said. For those who hold the ‘public trust’, a title that extends far beyond public servants such as politicians and other ‘officials’, if they continue to uphold the overall ‘official’ 9/11 story even while questioning it in a roundabout manner, it is in my opinion the litmus test.
Worse I have grown weary of the disingenuous argument put forth by some that to speak frankly in public about 9/11 will destroy their credibility and thus their effectiveness as they battle the Empire from within. If one does not speak out against the Empire, yet one derives power from the Empire, ‘one’ is little more than a lackey and controlled opposition to/of/for the Empire. One ‘fact’ is becoming crystal clear as we progress deeper and deeper into this insanity. The Empire serves The Empire and only those who serve The Empire. Period!
At some point down the road to total corruption all energy expended by The Empire, and those who suckle from The Empire, is directed towards sustaining and defending The Empire. From that point on one is either serving that purpose (and lackeys, useful idiots and controlled opposition most certainly do) or one is expelled by The Empire from the (inner) circle of The Empire. Thus any chance one might have had to ‘change’ The Empire is lost………because there was never a ‘chance’ to change it from within to begin with.
I am not calling out anyone in particular because doing so would serve no purpose other than to start a shouting match and further the ‘divide and conquer’ technique those in power use to control and subvert those who are not in power and might otherwise have a voice. I have no doubt many who profess to be battling The Empire from within truly believe they are doing so. That said ultimately it does not change the fact that at best, in the eyes of The Empire, they are useful idiots regardless of whether they know or care they are.
But the second part of the 9/11 Litmus Test applies to everyone else who believes whatever they want to ‘believe’ regarding 9/11. I don’t care which side of the fence we are on, either pro or anti official story or anywhere in between, because it really doesn’t matter. If our view is fixed and unmoving, or worse, confined to a small narrow space where we can maintain the illusion of intellectual flexibility, we too are useful idiots and pawns of The Empire. Notice I say ‘we’ because I am not immune to this infection.
The Empire cares not what we think so long as we are safely corralled within thought boxes and mind memes. Just as long as we hope/expect/pray change is coming, even if that change is believed to spring from collapse brought about by corruption, fiat debasement, loss of dollar reserve status, foreign overextension of empire, foreign or domestic war, whatever the case may be, we for the most part will remain in place feeding the beast……even while we make plans and prepare for “The End of Empire”.
This holds true even for those who choose to believe little to no change is coming, essentially another of the ‘official’ stories we can all believe in. If I can convince myself things will work out, that all we need to right the ship of state is a different President, Congressional critter or some new laws forcing ‘them’ to stop messing things up (read that as change without…well, you know…’change’) then once again I render myself impotent and from The Empire’s perspective safely on the sidelines biding my time while still participating in the Ponzi and feeding the machine.
What 9/11 did, quite effectively I might add, is violently and dramatically change and focus the world’s perspective in general and the average American citizen’s in particular. A ‘new’ boogeyman was created in order for attention to be directed towards a specific area, which just so happens to draw attention away from another. Thirteen years later the intended consequences are still being implemented. As long as we remain mesmerized by the symptoms of the disease we remain effectively disabled from dealing with the root cause of our illness. Mission Accomplished!
It is time to wake up and head deeper down the rabbit hole. Contrary to popular belief ‘our’ collective problems will not be solved unless and until our inner dysfunction and insanity are confronted and recognized. We are our own worst enemy; a quaint saying everyone thinks applies to others and not to ourselves. As long as ‘We the People” continue to believe this fallacy the ancient divide and conquer techniques will reign supreme.
The 9/11 Litmus Test is not about what we know or don’t know, but how we deal with our knowledge and ignorance as well as ourselves while doing so. Once we begin to lift the veil of ignorance and ideology we are like sharks; either we keep moving forward or we die. There is no more treading water for that is reserved for those left behind.
09-10-2014
Cognitive Dissonance
The answers are not black and white, but gray all over.

- advertisements -


It's that time of the year again to remind me of the hundreds of wasted hours I have spent on this subject during the past 13 yrs, getting ostracised, insulted, and belittled by internet trolls and even people I have loved. I swore I wouldn't post anything on this subject ever, yet here I am on this fucking thread.
But this time to applaud an article that makes the important distinction between what we know and what we think we know. By that logic, I can say that I know absolutely NOTHING about what happened on 9/11 since I was not involved nor personally met anyone with first hand experience on the multitude of strategic variables that coincided that day. I can, however, tell you that what I THINK I know about that day is rather voluminous. More than I wanted to know. More than I can share in one sitting. I reckon many here share the same feeling.
Although the article does not mention it, it is important to define "knowledge" itself. It is a progression in the steps towards wisdom that starts with Data -> Information -> Knowledge -> (That hopefully leads to) Wisdom. Human beings are not omnipotent, we can't be in all places at the same time, so for every new sensory input that we did not personally witness, we rely on second hand information and inferences about raw data to form a knowledge base which may be useful in our daily lives and our decision making processes.
So what I THINK I know is actually a collection of second hand analysis, inferences and perhaps disparate pieces of coincidences. I MUST acknowledge that, even if it galls me. So what do I have left to justify the hundreds, maybe thousands of hours of anguish, horror, and bitterness? Documented incidents that have not been dismissed:
Do those and many, many incidences of outright lies and half truths blasted over the airwaves since a decade ago justify my distrust and skepticism of the official version? I believe it does. In the end, the only thing left is trust in the source of the information that wants to become common knowledge and there is no trust in the government nor its agents in the mainstream no matter how loud and repetitive they become.
Thank you for your thoughtful comment.
"Although the article does not mention it, it is important to define "knowledge" itself."
Back in early August I wrote an article that discussed this in depth. You might be interested. An excerpt below of the second paragraph.
"Precisely what is it you think you ‘know’ for certain? Exactly what
‘knowledge’ do you possess which is of such certainty and veracity that
it need never be seriously questioned or examined? Ultimately if
something never occurred to me it is simply because I decided the softer
easier way forward was to participate in group-think and not question my
‘reality’. I alone am responsible for my curiosity quotient or lack
thereof."
Fourth paragraph excerpt.
"Knowledge, information, propaganda and belief, while all distinctly
different words with dissimilar meanings, are often conflated to mean
nearly the same thing. Or more accurately, the meanings and definitions
are blurred, combined and contrived in order to create a controlling
thought meme that is skillfully separated from reality and ‘truth’.
Herein is the problem as I see it, or at least a major issue that
greatly contributes to groupthink, the hive mind and ultimately the
sacrifice of the ‘self’."
Cog I just wanted to tell you what a fantastic write up that was. Thank you
Oh and btw cool shot of the Bean. :)
http://www.c-span.org/video/?321398-2/presidential-address-islamic-state...
SEPTEMBER 10, 2014
Presidential Address on Islamic State Threat
President Obama delivered an address to the nation on the threat posed by the Islamic State (ISIS/ISIL) and the administration’s strategy for degrading the terrorist group’s capabilities.
.
for the record.
I am not at all surprised by how this thread has started.
At this point in time, the last thing that is an effective evangel for anyone's theory about 9/11 is calling us all "f***ing morons" and punctuating it with a YT video link.
Oh yeah, I can't believe anything in a gov't report, but I "must" believe something in a proeletyzing video made by a person I never met. If this is what the pursuit of truth has become in 2014, I welcome ambivalence.
There are very nice examples of spoof videos made about 9/11, conspiracy theorists running with them as "absolute proof", and the videographer then coming out showing it was a fake. Trust no one, especially posters you don't know from Adam.
If one actually is interested in the truth about 9/11 it is necessary, and sufficient, to analyse what happened to WTC7.
WTC7 stands out as the singularity that exposes the false flag. The lame responses regarding WTC7 from those that shill the official US/Zionist Deep State narrative or those who (God help them) actually believe the US/Zionist Deep State narrative are pathetic to say the least, but amusing to watch as they logically step all over themselves and 1) say on one hand that WTC1&2 debris or shock somehow caused WTC7 to fall and 2) explain on the other hand why WTC7 was not covered at all in the official investigation carried out by the US/Zionist Deep State...
My conclusion is that another major false flag is imminent, and there is a need to keep the sheep looking down: it will not do for the sheep to notice that they are being gamed by malevolent psychopaths
Even NIST had a difficult time spitting out a implausible cover story for WTC7. Of course no one is allowed to examine the computer programming or 'assumptions' that went into their black box computer modeling that supposedly backs up their bullshit.
"Even NIST had a difficult time spitting out a implausible cover story for WTC7. Of course no one is allowed to examine the computer programming or 'assumptions' that went into their black box computer modeling that supposedly backs up their bullshit."
Except that debris from a collapsing One World Trade, struck Seven World Trade, it would have still been standing at the end of the day.
Considering the damage to Seven World trade, and the decision not to fight the fire, especially after 343 fire fighters had been killed in the collapse of the Towers, there was no reason to hide a demolition of 7, if there had been one.
Funny, because the world has never, ever, ever seen a veritable "controlled demolition free fall collapse" result from a side impact and an office fire.
Keep them eyes shut tight
"Funny, because the world has never, ever, ever seen a veritable "controlled demolition free fall collapse" result from a side impact and an office fire.
Keep them eyes shut tight"
Funny, no one has ever seen a controlled demolition without a controlled demolition.
I am surprised that you still don't get it. How many examples do you need to get up to speed on 9/11? I could name a dozen or more off the top of my head if you think it might help you understand facts from theories.
If you're referring to the Corbett video "911: A Conspiracy Theory" you Totally missed the point. That entire presentation is the official version of what supposedly happened.
In some way, the Inside Job theory exposes 9/11 as a false flag operation, yet still functions as a false flag itself, since by directing public outrage against the US government, it fails to designate the masterminds of the operation.
It trades one false flag for another, although of course, the US flag is, in that matter, not 100 percent false. This basic observation leads us to formulate a new paradigm for understanding 9/11, one which takes into account the two false flags - one sewed behind the other - designed within the plot.One of the purposes of having a US false flag sewed or hidden under the Al-Qaeda false flag, is to force the US leaders to pretend they believe in the bin Laden fairy tale, knowing full well that lifting the bin Laden mask will make Uncle Sam's face appear under it.
Since they know they don't have control of the media, they also know they would not be able to lift that second mask to expose
...Israel!
They would be politically dead before even trying.But it is not enough to control mainstream and alternative media. Those who orchestrated 9/11 must also control the 9/11 Truth movement.
This movement was not just infiltrated and contaminated by people with another agenda than "truth", but largely led from the beginning by such people.
While corporate media stick to the official Al-Qaeda thesis, the dominant stream of the 9/11 Truth movement defends exclusively the Inside Job thesis. Despite their outward disagreement, both are basically Israel-friendly.
This puts the US officials in an impossible dilemma, and forces them to cover Israel's crime to save their own ass.
If one day, under mounting pressure from public opinion or for some other strategic reason, the mainstream media abandons the official story, the well-rehearsed slogan "9/11 was an inside job" will have prepared Americans to turn against their own government, while the neocon Zionists will remain legally untouchable.
God knows what will happen, if the government has not by then succeeded to disarm its citizens through Sandy Hook-types psy-ops. Government officials have little choice but to stick to the Al-Qaeda story, at least for the next fifty years.
Fruit of the psychopath: 9/11 and the triple crossThen there are those for whom the truth is simply unbearable
And for them a convenient scapegoat is all that is needed
Instead, take a good hard look at the state, and let its perfidy wash over you, taste its vile spirit in your soul, and then you can calmly accept the truth of its monstrosity and its capacity to cause pain, misery and death in this world
Cheers
Hands down, worst article I have read on ZH. Been reading for years. This site didn't exist at 9/11, but if it did I'm sure it would have been blaming the Jooos and neocons.
The 9/11 truther people vote for Democrats in general, yet somehow believe that Dems wouldn't have to be in on the conspiracy, a conspiracy that would require hundreds if not thousands of people to pull off.
So all the people who pulled 9/11 off without a hitch also don't squeal at all. Makes perfect sense.
The litmus test is that if you deny 9/11 you are probably a closet Commy and you are not on my side during revolution 2.0
reset 71,
you are hilarious, seriously funny.
but, keep in mind, we laugh with you,
not at you.
.
the neocons did 9-11, no question, as you point out,
but there was a bitch and a hitch you may have missed. a hitch
millions have noticed and repeatedly commented upon
and documented. the revolution will not be televised or reported
but it will silently manifest; then you will get the joke
and laugh at yourself, how funny you/it are.
.
reset 72.....?
the pigs squeal everyday, can't you hear em'?
what do you think isis is about?
So people who defend SCIENCE are now somehow closet commies? I hope you choke on that bag of dicks youre eating you fucking moron.
P.S. Cunt.
Is that your fantasy, so you can give me mouth to mouth when I start choking?
If you write "SCIENCE" to make a point, you are douche. That is a FACT.
You call it "fight club", yet your comment has 24 up arrows and 0 down.
It's more like the choir club because that is who you are singing to.
Are you so weak in your principles that the way that you can feel validated in your own ideas is through others' agreement? Are your ideas not your own? Are you lacking in any core of character?
Your lame response, to which I am responding, is DEMONSTRATIVE OF THIS EMPIRICALLY EVIDENTIAL FACT.
How pathetic. It truly is pathetic that you have a lack of a spine.
If fact since you are so prone to contortionism I am certain that the lack of a spine serves you well...AS YOU AUTOFELLATE.
You must be the man in this picture...Note that this originates at Wikipedia...That must be a photo of you.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autofellatio#mediaviewer/File:Autofellatio6.jpg
You do not even have the intestinal fortitude to come knockin' at my door...
Fight Club? I am more into Project Mayhem, myself.
Here is my address you spineless wonder... Demonstrate that you have a spine. Prove me wrong.
Let's go hunting. Bring your guns...
12223B Woodside Avenue
Lakeside, CA USA.
Other than that go and suckle upon yourself as you whine about no positive affirmations you socialist little twit.
I looked up your address and it doesn't seem right. You live at a cheap beer and tobacco shop?
Let me get this straight- I insulted communists and 9/11 truthers so now you want to have a gun fight with me? Ummm, no thanks.
Even though I'd probably win because it would totally be a sneak attack, I don't want to feel guilty my whole life. I would feel pretty bad knowing that I assassinated some dude just for being a drunk internet troll.
"The litmus test is that if you deny 9/11 you are probably a closet Commy and you are not on my side during revolution 2.0"
Please wear a pink carnation in your breast pocket during revolution 2.0 orientation and I'll be sure to ignore you.
Signed,
CD
(Commy Dissonance)
<Can I come out of the closet now? Please?>
I said "probably" a closet Commy. Now you come out and say you are a Communist. Your response makes as little sense as your original article.
We are both fighting TPTB and realize that our society has been blinded by an unsustainable system. The only bone I pick with you is that supporting the official 9/11 "narrative" doesn't make one a pawn of "The Empire".
9/11 truthers are the more likely pawns because their opinions are ignored by the vast majority of reasonable people, which makes them innefective. "The Empire" as you call it, loves innefective people.
I guess that is why the empire loves the Federal Reserve Bank?
It was rather humorous that after the article about the missing $7 Trillion in punlically held debt was published on ZH that it was corrected within three hours.
When someone uses the word truth, as in the meme "truther", as that which is to be ridiculed then it demonstrates that the person whom uses it celebrates lies and deceit.
That exposes one's own DISHONESTY. That is the reason that 9-11 is the litmus test. How is that for being "effective"?
What I do know about 911 is that the terrorists (whoever they are) won (money and power and weakened what used to be the USA)
I am experienced at Remote Viewing, and I assure you that I remote viewed the installation of explosives, and the clearing of floors for security to make sure that no occupants of the building were privy to what was going on. When I remote viewed the installation of explosives
I sensed what was going on. In 1995 I had a vision of the downing
of both WT1 and WT2. The remote view I experienced was just before
the buildings came down by a couple of months. When security was suspiciously telling occupants that they had to be clear of certain floors
for a 24 hour period, that's when they were installing the nano-thermite explosives. Evidence of nano-thermite was found in the dust, and on live video of one of the buildings. When I witnessed the molten steel
dripping down from one of the buildings during the live event that day I remembered my vision in 1995 and I instantly remembered
the remote viewing I experienced previous to the buildings coming down by a couple of months. In brief, I am telling everyone here on Z/H the truth, and nothing but the truth, so help me God. The official version of events will never be undermined by the status quo that occupies power. The 911 Official version will remain a thorn in the side of average Americans for the duration of history that the Official
Version was built for. The Council on Foreign Relations was the principle architect of 911, along with the principle authors Paul Wolfowitz, and Donald Rumsfeld, as well as Dick Cheney. This is the truth, and Americans cannot handle the truth as Jack Nicholson once said. Z/H may be an interesting website but Z/H is not about to start
telling the truth either. Americans would not know what to do without denial and obfuscation when it comes to 911 and anything 'official'.
OCCUPY JEB BUSH & 911 SECURITY - OCCUPY EVERYTHING
Please tell us more about things you have remote viewed.
I appreciate that you are politely asking me to disclose more, but I've already said enough to get attacked for what I claim I have seen. I thought the people on Z/H were cool enough to disclose to on a few things. You seem mature enough to accept what I have said, but everyone else is full of animosity to what I have claimed to have seen. It's tough enough being able to remote view without being criticized for my experiences. I have seen many horrific things in my years of remote viewing. Some of the things I have seen I would never talk about with anyone let alone Z/H people. Moreover, I don't particularly want to attract the wrong people to what I am saying. I thought I could trust the folks on Z/H to be somewhat more tactful in the approach taken to what I have stated. Eventually, I will demonstrate to all on Z/H that I am legit about remote viewing. Further, I do appreciate the interest you have in learning more about RV. When I feel safer to talk I will disclose more, but right now I feel kind of abused for what I know to be the truth about 911.
"I am experienced at Remote Viewing...."
Time for your Thorazine martini. Two olives?
I tried the 'remote viewing' thing once.
The first thing I did was to put the television in a 'remote place' (the basement), and closed my eyes and tried to view it. It didn't work (I guess the three stories of house in the way must have blocked my view). One time, I parked outside a drive-in, and tried to watch the movie without sound (that didn't work so well either, as I could VIEW the movie, but had no fucking idea what was happening on-screen)
Finally I gave in, and sat in the Barcalounger and reclined. Six-pack at my side, I used the optical remote to turn on the television, and my brain passed into a state of semi-sleep ('Beta-wave' activity), watching things like Miley Cyrus twerking, and Coca-Cola commercials. I actually fell asleep once, and saw the future unfolding (the song 'Sunshine And Lollipops' was playing in my head, along with footage from the Vietnam 'war'). Some clown kept saying 'Good Morning, VIETNAM!', again and again, like some repeating vision of a future that I thought was a forewarning that I should not tell others about until after the release of the movie. I have fun, even now, playing the movie and telling people that 'I TOLD YOU SO' (even though I forgot to tell them). I get the STRANGEST LOOKS...
(For those not aware, this comment is a reply to someone calling itself 'MASTER OF UNIVERSE', and is to be taken as the parody that it is. Don't make me add the obligatory 'sarc' tag. The 'Occupy Wall Street' movement was co-opted approximately 10 days after it started by the CIA, and the CPUSA, and other disinformation agents involved in all aspects of the greater MEDIA 'OFFICIAL OUTLETS'. If this guy wants to 'occupy' Jeb Bush, then this will be between Jeb and him [perhaps Jeb doesn't WANT to be 'occupied' in the way that the communistic Greeks like to 'occupy' each other mano-a-mano, but that's not my business])
This poster is deriding ZERO HEDGE for 'NOT TELLING THE TRUTH'.
"Z/H may be an interesting website but Z/H is not about to start telling the truth either."
FUCK YOU, 'MASTER OF UNIVERSE'. No, really; seriously; FUCK YOU!
Monty, that was brilliant!
WOW, MontgomeryScott, you really are a pathetic troll with a homophobic imagination. Do you work for the USA military by any chance? You seem ignorant enough, and you are definately homophobic enough? Does the concept of remote viewing bother you that much?
WAIT FOR IT...
3.
2.
1!
He's a RAYCISS! DAMN! HE'S a HOMOPHOBIC RAYCISS! SHIT! He's a TIN-FOIL-HAT-wearing HOMOPHOBIC RAYCISS!
"Did you state that you wish to suck my large and erect penis this night?"
Naw. You are COCKSUCKER, but not MY cocksucker.
Damn it, I must be truly IGNORANT. 'MOV' sez so... don'cha, bitch?
The Concept doesn't really bother me at all. Why don't you sit yourself down & "remote view" & then tell us what is going to happen tomorrow. Something? Nothing? Certainly, Not everbody can do the things you claim. Or, perhaps we should just have "Faith" in your precience abilities?
In a dream one night, I saw Dov Zackheim talking to the other members of the PNAC 'think-tank', telling them that only those with circumsized penises were worthy of carrying out the 'New Pearl Harbor'. The two sides don't eat pork, and both are subservient to Saturday, and shellfish are an anathema to them both, but they can't seem to get the 'foreskin' issue agreed upon. Richard ('DICK') Cheney looked somewhat younger, but full of vitriol, as he stated that McCain could be run as the 'foil' for the rebellion against the 'NEOCONS'. Later in the dream, I saw the 'ONE', who didn't have legitimate credentials; the MULATTO; the 'commiesymplant'; who seemed to rise to power in the opposite side of the 'spectrum'.
THE MOTHER-FUCKER states that ZERO HEDGE does not publish THE TRUTH.
FUCK HIM.
His HANDLERS are gonna be SO PISSED...
The facts of remote viewing are not in dispute. I remote viewed
the weaponization of Ebola in Sierra Leone via USA Military Class 4 Bioterrorism Lab. I am predicting [because you are asking me to]
that Ebola will wipe out half the world's population shortly. Is this good enough for you or do you want more?
You're using Radio Shack 'TANDY' break-points.
I remember these.
There seemed to be an issue between the different scripts.
'TANDY' couldn't put more than a certain amount of 'characters' on a single line (hence the 'breaks' in the posting).
Africa and Malaysia seemed to be particularly affected with this shit on the 'olde' internet. 'Radio Shack' is now a memory, which is relegated to the memories of those who had to deal with these 'page-breaks' as they sorted through the '3-dim-array' 'basic' and 'fortran' and 'fortran-IV' shit.
Using BINARY to play CHESS is like Obama thinking he's a'GOLFER'.
TERRORTERRORTERRORISTS!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W2MUyNdYJ4g
You really suck at this.
"I am experienced at Remote Viewing"
You know there is therapy for this, don't you.
Yes, there are several methods.
#1) Change your diet, and stop doing drugs. (Naw, this one won't be done, because it requires consious desisions which might impact the 'comfort zone'.)
#2) Pay large sums of money to let a psych-'doctor' tell you that you are actually 'normal' (while administering more drugs which are better [more POTENT] than the ones you are currently taking). OOPS! This one will only EXASERBATE a bad situation...
#3) Stop watching reruns of Madonna talking about converting to the 'Kabalah' version of the Protocols Of The Elders Of Zion.
#4) Realize that Anton 'La-Vey' was NOT 'christ' (and, niether are YOU).
The dude can predict the FUTURE! Too bad he didn't tell everyone before the 'event', isn't it?
Look it up on Google, cifo. The CIA has been using 'Remote Viewing'
for years and it is scientifically documented as being valid by USA Military Psychologists. If you are limited in intelligence and cannot fathom 'remote viewing' that is not my problem. If you are a typical uneducated American there is nothing anyone can do to inform you
or the ignorant parents that raised you. In brief, you are likely a genetic
imbecile raised by more genetic imbeciles. Good luck, cifo. Perhaps you could join the military and surf the net acting like the imbecile you really are.
lol....dude you've got to understand that unless you are able to put up, best not to even open your mouth. whether or not you saw these things before is frankly irrelevant - tell us when they're going to tank the market and be right about it and you might have a person or two believe you!
Fair enough, d.a.
HOLY SHIT!
The CIA has been doing this shit since the MK-ULTRA program! That must make you feel really GOOD!
SEE! Just drop a blotter of acid in, along with the electroshocks and sleep depravation and those OTHER drugs, and wait (well, maybe six months); and SEE! We got 'prescient predictions'! WELL, there were some 'not quite as expected' results, but let's just call them 'COLLATERAL DAMAGE', shall we?
SEE! LOOK IT UP ON FUCKING GOOGLE? The CIA has been doing this shit for fucking DECADES, in fact! There was a 'gap' between the Nazis and the USSR and the CONUS regarding 'mind-control', SEE, and the CIA worked on people in general by PREDICTIVE PROGRAMMING regarding 'Extra-Sensory-Perception', SEE?
'THE SIXTH SENSE', see? 'ROSICRUSIONS', see? The so-called 'THIRD EYE', see?
The word 'IMBECILE' was used only THREE times in the post that I am replying to, and the words 'uneducated', 'scientifically', 'ignorant', 'typical', and 'inform' were used only once. The word 'genetic' was used TWICE (as if to imply that genetic traits are the lord of intelligence or lack thereof). I like THIS part, the best: ..."and it is scientifically documented as being valid by USA Military Psychologists."
The dude (YOU) is (ARE) talking smack. He actually thinks that the words 'Military' and 'Intelligence' are somehow mutually EXCLUSIVE.
Did you have something to say regarding the obvious controlled demolitions of the three buildings in the WTC complex on 9/11/2001?
Tell NORAD and all the other ass-kissing fucks that they did a good job of NOT INTERCEPTING the planes, would you? Without THEIR conscious denials and obfuscations, none of this shit would be POSSIBLE.
REMOTE-VIEWING, MY ASS!
The first problem problem is trust. Whose information should be trusted. Since most all of us have no personal knowledge, we depend on the "testimony" of others.
Another problem is the learned or trained into us narratives or patterns which we use to understand "truth." "All governments lie." This group is moral and righteous, while this group is despicable or capable of anything? Buildings don't collapse that way? We trust our leaders?
Like Socrates, "I know nothing." Like Cicero, "Cui bono?" I ask who benefits. Who is being protected? "Skim milk masquerades as cream," from Gilbert and Sullivan.
Since none of us is omniscient, we guess only in part. I doubt in full and see who benefits, with the reality and horror that their benefiting brings.
Is it you who has posted several times on ZH a comment that goes something along the lines of "Trust is a lazy man's drug"? I liked it when I saw it but failed to write it down. Please correct me if I am wrong or my quote if I am right.
It was me. Trust soothes, dulls senses,induces sleep and becomes addictive. Wouldn't it be nice, if someone would care and think for me. There is no free trust.
Thank you. With your permission I shall steal that idea and possible craft it into an article.
Aldous Huxley, or George Orwell?
Rod Serling was pretty good.
VP Cheney Issued 9/11 Stand Down Order While Missile Approached Pentagon: Tip Of The Government Conspiracy