This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

Guest Post - Skyception: The Deception and Manipulation of ‘We the People’ and our Skies

Cognitive Dissonance's picture




 

Guest Post

Skyception: The Deception and Manipulation of ‘We the People’ and our Skies

By

Morpheus_at_TIF

 

 

 

 

You will always find original articles by Cognitive Dissonance and other authors first on www.TwoIceFloes.com before they are posted here on ZH.

To become a Premium or Basic member click here. If you wish to subscribe to ‘Dispatches’, a periodic newsletter from Cognitive Dissonance and TwoIceFloes Creations, please click here.

 

 

 

Introduction by Cognitive Dissonance

 

Just when you think a subject has been analyzed to death someone comes along and breaks new ground. And not just in the conclusions they draw, but in the thought process and logic they apply. Sometimes it can be so new and innovative we might be tempted to shake our heads and say “This can’t be right” when in fact it might just be.

Morpheus is one of those rare individuals who is never satisfied with prepackaged conclusions, especially when they utilize stale information (often carefully disguised ‘beliefs’) and conforms to a polarized consensus. Where most might be happy absorbing such a pretty little package, Morpheus immediately starts asking uncomfortable questions and challenges the basic premises. Essentially he is the poster child for those who truly think outside of the box.

In this three part series Morpheus tackles an extremely controversial subject with humility, diligence and most importantly an open mind. Rather than remain within the mainstream or alternative views Morpheus has attempted to gather information and points of view from many different and diverse disciplines and practitioners. Personally I think he has done a great job.

 

 

 

 

Chapter One of Three

The Levels of Deception and how Psychological Operations are Used Against Us

 

When was the last time you looked up at the daytime sky and really examined it for several minutes? Does it seem different to you in some way, but you just are not sure what it is? Increasingly, people from all walks of life are beginning to realize that at times our skies look quite different from the way they were a few decades ago. While just a few years ago these people would have been laughed out of the room if they expressed their views in public, more and more these days this subject is beginning to be taken seriously by the general public…..and even some ‘officials’ as well.

While some call this phenomenon Geoengineering or Climate Engineering, it is more commonly known in the alternative community as ‘Chemtrails’, where persistent vapor trails (supposedly of water vapor) are visible after a plane passes high overhead. There are many theories offered in the alternative media about what is happening, and we will examine nearly all. However, before we can address any of them we must first ask a more basic question: Why is it so difficult to discover the reasons behind what is going on and why is this observable phenomenon occurring at all? This chapter, the first of three, will describe some of the methods used to intentionally prevent us from knowing and understanding the truth.

Before we can begin to explore the truth we must first understand the various ways we are misled, manipulated and deceived using Psychological Operations or ‘psyops’. Once we are better able to see through the lies and cover stories, then we can begin to explore who and what is behind these programs and what it all means to us. ‘Aerosols’, whether visible or not, will be defined and used throughout these three chapters as the intentional application of materials - chemical, biological, nano or other particles - into the atmosphere most commonly by, but not limited to, airplane. The word ‘chemtrail’, a commonly used descriptive term many are familiar with, has become misleading and even derogatory which in turn helps to perpetuate the manipulation. Therefore it needs to be discarded and will be for the remainder of this series.

Psychological operations (pysops) are the means by which intelligence agencies, governmental operatives and private networks accomplish their deceptions and which operate on every social, corporate and governmental level imaginable. This chapter will examine a number of these psyops, all of which have been deployed against us, and provide examples so we may have the tools to avoid being duped or suckered into their deliberate lies and pursue their false leads.

The basic goal of any psyop is to provide cover for something the operatives wish to remain hidden or obscured. And in the case of aerosols and geoengineering, the psyops appears to be very large and complex since operations of this magnitude require a huge amount of money (many billions of dollars annually), time, cooperation among diverse groups and complicity to make it all happen. Particularly when you consider the number of pilots and air crews, media people, private corporations, governmental agencies and others involved who need to remain silent about it. Given all of these factors there seems to be little question about the importance of what they are covering up, something to keep in mind as we explore this subject further.

The most common and effective psyop used against us is known as ‘Manufactured Consent’ and ‘Manufactured Dissent’. When used together, these techniques are specifically designed to gather consensus for a particular opinion while simultaneously creating controlled, and easily dismissed, dissent by way of a carefully crafted opposing view. These methods are often employed in our political world to polarize an issue by creating false ‘choices’. We are either ‘Left’ or ‘Right’, ‘Conservative’ or ‘Liberal’, ‘Democrat or Republican’.

This also applies to the Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) debate where you are presented with only two choices. Either you are required to completely support AGW or you are derisively labeled a climate change denier if you question the so-called ‘settled science’ regardless of whether or not you actually deny changes in the climate. Argue all you want for either side, but you are not allowed to diverge from either, which in turn very effectively constrains both alternative discussions and outcomes.

These command and control techniques have been used for thousands of years to divide and rule the masses via politics, religion, ethnicity, race, gender and so many other ways in order to keep people partitioned and fighting amongst themselves. We might even speculate that Darwin’s theories of evolution were intended to act as Manufactured Dissent to obscure the true cause of evolution while providing a controlled outlet for those looking outside the church for answers to our creation. Given how Darwin’s work buried many truths only now coming to light, along with his connection to British elite and eugenics, and it is not difficult to reach this conclusion, especially when considering the true nature of the evolutionary process.

By forcing people to either side of the aisle in the AGW discussion, this psyops technique severely limits the ongoing conversation regarding the real factors behind climate change while discouraging any mention of aerosols without a verbal beat down consisting of derision, mockery or marginalization and coming from both sides. As you will see in the next chapter, the issue of AGW is inextricably linked to aerosols and it is important and necessary to maintain false beliefs and deception in the climate discussion in order to be useful for other more complicated psyops. Rarely does a psyops exist in a vacuum, but rather many psyops are carefully interlinked to build mutual credibility while more completely confusing the issues from the intermixing. This is done even when one entity does not control the other entity’s psyops. In the black ops world, even opposing forces will feed off each other for their own benefit.

 

Manipulation

Synergy of Psyops Mind and Motion

 

The goal is to keep you endlessly circling this cognitive level and to keep you engaged, consumed and neutered in this ideological fight. For some it has become almost a religion as they try to convert and convince others to act now in order to stop the so-called ‘carbon pollution’ that is supposedly cooking and destroying our planet. And those against AGW are just often as duped, since they are against it for all the wrong reasons yet still serve a useful purpose in the fight. They are just as unwilling to look up and ask ‘why’, then openly discuss what is happening to our skies. Unfortunately both sides are just as quick to dismiss the science in defense of their favored ideology.

If for some reason we find the courage to break from the ideological pack and speak up about the truth, that our climate is influenced by many other factors more significant than human activity and our carefully hidden and obscured solar (and solar system) history is critical to know when trying to understand what is happening today; if this direct approach is tried with such a degree of professionalism that it threatens to be publically influential, then the next level of psyops is quickly deployed to prevent us from effectively speaking out.

Money for silence is often the first (and most effective) approach. But if you don't remain silent, potentially controlling information or ‘files’ – containing some of the illegal or embarrassing things you may have done or are currently doing - are used against you to force your silence. If that fails or damaging ‘files’ are not available, more direct ‘Soft Weapons’ are used. There are a number of different approaches that can be employed to apply pressure and keep you contained. They can threaten your funding or career, destroy your business and personal relationships, attack you in the media or even physically threaten you. The sky (pun intended) is the limit.

One can look back in time to both Nicola Tesla and Immanuel Velikovsky and recognize how this line of attack was used quite effectively during the course of the last century to keep their important work and theories out of public knowledge and discourse. There are numerous examples of modern day scientists and other professionals suffering severe and debilitating consequences when they spoke out against, or directly questioned, the AGW ideology. And all it takes is a few public beatings to dissuade others from openly considering other factors when researching or discussing climatic change.

Most people remain at this level in the ideological fight without ever seriously considering what is happening both in our skies and further out in space. Is it no wonder then that people remain functionally unaware of the persistent trails and aerosol programs since they have been manipulated into not questioning it? Many might not remember, but a decade ago questions about persistent trails were widely covered in the media and it was openly discussed at the time. The term used back then was also ‘chemtrails’ and in order to deflect and dampen the public discourse the word was quickly associated with the CIA-developed derogatory term ‘Conspiracy Theorist’.

With that weapon in their arsenal, the operatives could provide a simple but illogical explanation for the persistent trails and quickly dismiss serious people armed with valid questions by the effective use of public derision. Most people quickly moved back into their slumber and did not question the issue further, especially since they did not want to be associated with all those other publically disliked Conspiracy Theorists. A similar method was used early on to dispel ‘Truther’ questions about 9/11. It was, and remains, a very negatively charged weapon that can be quickly mobilized to shut down discussion on any controversial subject.

However, there are those of us who realize something is going on that is not normal, especially since the persistent trails have increased in frequency over the last decade, thereby prompting many more people to ask penetrating questions, do their own research and begin to break away from the hive mind of consensus and corralled thinking.

At this point, newer and increasingly complex psyops are required as it becomes progressively more difficult to keep a lid on it by keeping us confused and contained. As we begin to follow the camouflaged trail and look to non-mainstream sources for information and analysis, we find sock puppets who are paid trolls, opposition figures and various others in chat rooms and forums. An entire industry of professional trolls has been created just to convince you, me and millions like us that it is crazy and socially dangerous to look any further.

Many of our friends and family, who often lack the natural curiosity and intestinal fortitude to swim against the tide and be shunned themselves, prefer to think we are nuts to even discuss subjects such as this. Complicating matters immensely, we have probably brought our own AGW opinion or ideology to the party and have yet to find other resources that could educate us about our climate in relation to the space beyond our atmosphere, our own sun and other celestial bodies. With all this, most mildly curious people just throw up their hands in frustration and head back to their mind numbing entertainment for emotional relief.

 

Opiates for the Mind

Opiates for the Mind

 

The lack of understanding of the AGW psyops (or any psyop for that matter) provides an opportunity for more nuanced operatives called ‘Gate Keepers’ to engineer their blocking techniques. These highly trained specialists provide kernels of credible information and readily admit to part of the truth, thereby providing plausible cover for the larger hidden issues. The gate keepers are widely supported by the subverted mainstream media and are declared public experts, thereby appearing highly credible in the eye of the general public. This valuable media support enables them to bar the gates to embargoed information and a better understanding of the subject matter. Often the information provided by the gate keeper is designed to distract and disarm or, in this case, to feed the overall ideology of AGW no matter what side you may still support.

We can think of a few groups that fit this description, for example Geoengineering Watch to name just one. They are popular in some of the alternative media and are involved in the production of documentaries that perpetuate the AGW myth, yet they refuse to engage in serious discussion about the role our sun plays in our planet's climate. Ultimately they are similar in function and style to Noam Chomsky, Glenn Greenwald and Amy Goodman, all well-known 9/11 (and other verboten subjects) gate keepers.

Now that geoengineering itself is becoming more familiar to the public, in the latest psyops twist we now find much talk about using geoengineering to combat the Global Warming threat, effectively using leverage on one subject to perpetuate another in what is called a ‘Limited Hangout’. This ‘theme’ has become more prominent in the alternative media over the last few years, with questionable sources like Abby Martin of Russia Today or even Amy Goodman of Democracy Now! playing their well rehearsed role to help roll it all out for public consumption. I will speak more on this subject in the next chapter.

Another twist to be aware of is Nexrad, a term often used to describe land-based electromagnetic facilities used together with aerosols to manufacture all of our weather. We are informed it is used solely for this purpose; sometimes it is even promoted as weather warfare. However, there is no discussion of space weather impacts when discussing Nexrad and solar influences are never mentioned by those acting as a Gatekeeper for this issue.

As mentioned earlier, limited hangouts are another attractive nuisance designed to keep you from the truth. We can identify when a limited hangout is deployed by recognizing certain revealing characteristics identified by Webster G. Tarpley, who had originally developed the list during his study of geopolitical events. Some of the same giveaways can also be applied to identify other types of limited hangout psyops on topics such as aerosols.

The list is as follows.

 

  1. Media Darling -- you are the spotlight of the media
  2. Nothing New -- you learn nothing new from what they reveal
  3. Nothing Big -- they don't address larger connected issues; for example 9/11, false flag attacks, financial fraud etc
  4. Prepares New Coverts Ops –- it acts as cover for larger operations
  5. Cheerleaders Get Prestigious Careers -- back to Chomsky, Goodman and Greenwald
  6. No Top Careers Destroyed -- damaging information that is attributed to, or blamed upon, no one of importance
  7. Damascus Road Conversion -- now s/he believes the ‘truth’ should be revealed 

 

A subject that quickly comes to mind when looking at this list is HAARP. With books, TV shows and other significant media coverage focused squarely upon HARRP, one has to wonder why so much can be known about a ‘secret’ program that gets so much of the blame for aerosols, weather modification and other related programs. It was handed to you and me on a beautifully engraved silver platter as the solution to all our questions. All one need do is consume and then sleep.

Another debilitating technique used is to create or enflame infighting within the ‘community’ to induce you and I to choose the ‘right’ side by accepting their argument for why they alone are correct. We saw this recently with Dane Wigington and Michael Murphy attacking each other while WeatherWar101 skillfully inserted him/herself into the fight. With explosive terms bandied about by both sides such as disinformation, agent/operative and psyops, it is easy to fall prey to these false ‘disagreements’. While they claim to occupy different sides of the discussion, all of them refuse to talk about the main influences on our climate and weather systems, even going so far as to deny it is relevant at all.

To fully understand the changes to our climate we must know our true solar history (something which has been deliberately kept from us) what is presently happening within our solar system and, perhaps more important, with our sun. If we fail to do so we will remain deeply confused, which leads directly to false trails down dead end rabbit holes. In chapter three you will find trusted information sources that can help you acquire this knowledge.

There are a number of theories that purport to explain the geoengineering and aerosol programs, some of which are likely organic while others are intentionally developed and planted to keep us confused and away from the truth. Regardless, each of them needs to be considered in light of all of the facts we have and viewed through the revealing lens of psyops. Remember, what is not talked about is often far more important than what is actually discussed. While some theories may be true or even part of larger operations or programs, others can be easily disproven as false, uninformed or intentional disinformation.

In chapter two we will examine some of these theories and poke holes in them where appropriate. In addition, we need to further explore the use and abuse of the word ‘Chemtrails’, a very broad and indistinct term commonly used to describe all we observe visually and chemically. It may be vitally important to publically abandon the use of this word and use persistent aerosols and non-persistent aerosols instead. The distinction is relevant and will be parsed further in chapter two.

Reference links can be found below the image.

 

Braintrails

Braintrails

 

 

 
Reference Links:

Psychological Operations

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_Operations

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_Operations_%28United_States%29

http://psywarrior.com/psyhist.html

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/09/AR2006040900890_pf.html

 

Manufactured Consent and Dissent:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1plTW0G6FSc

http://www.amazon.com/Manufacturing-dissent-Chomsky-Western-Critical/dp/B00081WK5E

http://memoryholeblog.com/2014/06/28/chossudovsky-on-challenging-media-disinformation-manufactured-dissent/

http://www.corbettreport.com/episode-074-the-inbred-elites-million-year-plan/

http://www.gnosticmedia.com/how-darwin-huxley-and-the-esalen-institute-launched-the-2012-and-psychedelic-revolutions-and-began-one-of-the-largest-mind-control-operations-in-history/

 

Soft Weapons and Sock Puppets

https://solari.com/blog/soft-weapons-with-charles-hughes-smith/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Earnest_Voice

 

Limited Hangouts

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limited_hangout

http://www.presstv.com/detail/2013/06/18/309609/how-to-identify-cia-limited-hangout-op/

http://youtu.be/FKLVFV8sGSs?t=1h

http://web.archive.org/web/20120316052943/http://www.letxa.com/nexradhoaxhistory.php

http://youtu.be/vY36INbzz8M?t=6m20s

 

Conspiracy Theory

http://memoryholeblog.com/2013/01/20/cia-document-1035-960-foundation-of-a-weaponized-term/

 

Gate Keepers

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gatekeeper

http://www.corbettreport.com/meet-noam-chomsky-academic-gatekeeper-video/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwZ-vIaW6Bc - "Who Cares" at 6:00

http://www.globalresearch.ca/noam-chomsky-and-the-willful-ignorance-of-911/5359871

 

Infighting

http://chemtrailsmuststop.com/2014/07/the-co-opting-of-a-movement-part-i/

http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/setting-the-record-straight-for-those-that-truly-care-about-the-battle-to-stop-climate-engineering/

http://chemtrailsplanet.net/2014/09/01/dane-wigington-loses-chemtrail-followers-as-michael-murphy-tells-all/

http://chemtrailsplanet.net/recommended-sites/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mwffn137YBg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vY36INbzz8M

http://www.thetruthdenied.com/news/2014/09/02/chemtrails-war-between-michael-murphy-and-dane-wigington/

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Mon, 12/08/2014 - 03:54 | 5527807 MEAN BUSINESS
MEAN BUSINESS's picture

YES! That's right! What's your website?

quick question, is it aluminum build up+brain/nervous+aerosol+vaccines? Tell me the TRUTH!

Mon, 12/08/2014 - 02:37 | 5527755 MEAN BUSINESS
MEAN BUSINESS's picture

Morph's launch party seems to be missing the main Morpheus 'recently'.

Where ar t'thou Morph? We note your SUDDEN SILENCE.

Mon, 12/08/2014 - 02:00 | 5527707 malek
malek's picture

Let me say so far I have not read one condensed and in itself coherent explanation what chemtrails would actually induce, i.e. why they would be created by some hidden power. (Even by your own accord, AGW came up so recently it has to be taken as an ex-post attempt in explanation.)

On the magnetic field thingy, does any EE believe that? The needed energy to create significant artificial fields are so large unless it somehow only needs single very short pulses, this calls up an association of a modernized version of Dr. Emmett Brown's in the 1950's "1.21 Gigawatt???"

But I will continue to read your next chapters and hopefully learn something new!

Mon, 12/08/2014 - 03:19 | 5527787 MedPro
MedPro's picture

I never Understood until recently .
My region was just sprayed ahead of a massive storm system. The spraying went on Thursday afternoon & by sunset the sky was pure haze. The system approached late Friday / early sat bringing with it over 2 " of rain for the duration of the weekend Along with rising temps in the 50's. 50's in Demember in the northeast? Since when? Temps this time of year are usually around freezing. & What about that "polar vortex".?

So this was done to raise atmospheric temps in order to prevent a crippling snowstorm over the weekend that would have blanketed the northeast thereby crippling many people's ability to shop during one of the last shopping weekends before Xmas.

Mon, 12/08/2014 - 01:35 | 5527688 combatsnoopy
combatsnoopy's picture

didn't Robert Shiller blather on about this in some book called "Animal Spirits"?  It COULD be true if you had enough to drink in front of a slot machine!   i know!  Let's stimulate the economy by mindfucking the boomers- failed chemistry experiments with an equity line and the voting majority.  

 

Scarier yet, they're playing mind games with big pharma.  The "Nothing New" game has been played out (aka. BLANKET STATEMENTS).  

"The lack of understanding of the AGW psyops (or any psyop for that matter) provides an opportunity for more nuanced operatives called ‘Gate Keepers’ to engineer their blocking techniques. These highly trained specialists provide kernels of credible information and readily admit to part of the truth, thereby providing plausible cover for the larger hidden issues. The gate keepers are widely supported by the subverted mainstream media and are declared public experts, thereby appearing highly credible in the eye of the general public. This valuable media support enables them to bar the gates to embargoed information and a better understanding of the subject matter. Often the information provided by the gate keeper is designed to distract and disarm or, in this case, to feed the overall ideology of AGW no matter what side you may still support."


 Journalism in the US is a big joke.  

Read up on the latest articles in the MSM about nutrition.  They shill.  They shill for coconut oil.  They're shilling hard for Metformin.  The diet industry is $66 billion per year, and I already have the metabolism figured out (I was forced to do this since the  doctors wanted to push drugs on me instead of just fixing me.  I caught them.)

It would be funny if the climate change "environmental engineers" and the doctors were busy mindfucking each other!  It would be as funny as trying to watch an Aussie Sheepdog trying to herd a pitbull.  Just add banker, big pharma would win in a heartbeat.   

I guess you can do ANYTHING with Katie Couric talking down to the audience as if we were in kindergarden.  I think that's what her and Hillary Clinton's majors were.  

If anything, it's just annoying.  Well beyond annoying.   "Nuanced" is the right word.  

 

 

 

Mon, 12/08/2014 - 01:01 | 5527641 VWAndy
VWAndy's picture

Out here AGW is a religion almost cult like.

Sun, 12/07/2014 - 23:56 | 5527481 MEAN BUSINESS
MEAN BUSINESS's picture

 

You publish an article on Zero Hedge discussing AGW in the middle of UNFCCC COP20/CMP10, which is underway 29 days after the final publishing of AR5, and fail to mention either of those facts, and then want to tell everyone to be on the lookout for those who would keep "important work and theories out of public knowledge and discourse." AR5 not important? mmmk.

 

Zero Hedge did not include any of the three significant AR5 events in 2014 in it's discourse. AR5 not important? mmmk.

 

Cognitive Dissonance receives a post card from Peru early on 07DEC14 and voila hours later publishes a story that includes discussion of AGW after having also (correct me if I'm wrong please) failed to discuss AR5 all year long too. AND, feels it is important to explain why he publishes this today!

 

Show the postcard CD. include the quote please.

 

I'm off to the Beach LULZ

 

p.s. AGW is a theory not an ideology. 

 

Mon, 12/08/2014 - 00:27 | 5527552 Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance's picture

AGW is consistently peddled as scientific fact with an intensity verging on a religious ferver. At the very least it is claimed by its devoted following as settled science. While the term 'theory' is used as cover to further the illusion of 'debate', nearly all the discussion is about how much, not if. Clearly the subject is being pushed by entities with an agenda. That alone compells an honest assessment.

Mon, 12/08/2014 - 03:07 | 5527776 MEAN BUSINESS
MEAN BUSINESS's picture

and thankfully MorphMan is here just in time to deliver the HONEST assessment. phew. Thanks for assisting Cognitive Dissonance!

signed' Suspicious Observers, Geowatch Sumptin', someguy's website. LULZ

Mon, 12/08/2014 - 01:19 | 5527664 MEAN BUSINESS
MEAN BUSINESS's picture

Did you notice the arctic polar bear has no visible id? LULZ

show the postcard. 

 

 

Mon, 12/08/2014 - 05:04 | 5527844 MEAN BUSINESS
MEAN BUSINESS's picture

"we are sorry our offices are now closed." Call again soon".

Sun, 12/07/2014 - 23:36 | 5527429 BeamMeUp
BeamMeUp's picture

If you're one step ahead you're a genious. If you're 2 or 3 steps ahead of everyone, you're a wackjob. I think cog is a few steps ahead, but does'nt fit in the category.

Thinking is good. Chemtrails have alot of elements detrimental to this good part of humanity. Do the people that control things care about humanity, or just prefer to continue on as a means to an end?

Look around you. Have you noticed any changes in behavior as the geoengineering has ramped up last few years?

Sun, 12/07/2014 - 23:31 | 5527412 BeamMeUp
BeamMeUp's picture

People that try to debunk chemtrails as to be regular contrails need to do a little more research. Conspiracy theorists in general are more "sane" than normies, as it takes a great deal more energy to debunk/deny than it does to use critical thinking, and discern the difference, and to spot the disinformation BITCHEZ.

The first rule of project mayhem.....

Thanks Cog and Morph

Sun, 12/07/2014 - 23:57 | 5527478 Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance's picture

Those who have been here on ZH for five or more years will remember that the subject of 9/11 on ZH was a third rail for a long time with the majority believing the official story. That slowly changed as the subject was repeatedly discussed here primarily by George Washington. The same evolution appears to be happening regarding this subject.

Sun, 12/07/2014 - 23:13 | 5527369 Reaper
Reaper's picture

The mental flaw is to believe that science with mathematics as a tool can make valid predictions. We observe. We compare with systems, or models, or mathematical organizations, or religions, and/or our preconceptions. We expect, hope and/or believe that similarities with our or someone else's preexisting mental structures exist.

We receive lots of information which may or may not be true or partially true. Much of this information is provided by those with an agenda seeking support. Most of what we "know" is provided by others. We,in fact,know little and are expected to make decisions and empower or not empower others. Nothing in the real world is identical to any mathematical or other model.

Doubt is the beginning of wisdom. Even observation is not to be trusted(Heisenberg Uncertainty Principal). Power corrupts. Seeking power corrupts certainly. Now, let me hear your hypothesis and your facts.

Sun, 12/07/2014 - 22:06 | 5527189 chindit13
chindit13's picture

So much to fear, so little time!

Did you also know that Men in Black is actually a documentary?  Sure.  Tommy Lee Jones went to Harvard, you know, and his roommate was none other than Al Gore.  That’s good enough “proof” for the internet, isn’t it?  Or are you too “deeply conditioned” to believe?

Please don’t use “We the People”, because that carries a presumption you and I might be the same species.  Unless you have lizard skin and bottles of Elite Elixir 322 stocked in the fridge, which is the antidote for chemtrails, you and I are very different indeed.

Tyler, is this how you want your website to be remembered?  When even Rick Santelli is laughing, maybe you’ve pandered a little too much to the Whackjob demographic.

 

Mon, 12/08/2014 - 09:13 | 5528071 Infinite QE
Infinite QE's picture

Coming from a person who genuflects at the altar of the war criminal George Soros. Ha. You're a fraud.

 

Sun, 12/07/2014 - 22:23 | 5527236 Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance's picture

Considering how many Conspiracy Theories have been proven Conspiracy Facts over the last few years, you might want to reconsider your "Whackjob" assessment. Only a frightened mind is as closed as yours appears to be.

Sun, 12/07/2014 - 22:43 | 5527297 NevadaMirage
NevadaMirage's picture

Belief in chemtrails is the litmus test for critcal thinking skills amongst the conspiracy crowd. That some former theories have emerged as fact does not mean that chemtrails will somehow or someday be validated. A contrail is a very basic thing to understand, but because the earthbound observer can only see it from afar the imagination runs wild. The real question should be: how many actual pilots believe in chemtrails? These are people who should be observing this nefarious activity first hand and up close... or are they all part of the conspiracy as well?

Sun, 12/07/2014 - 23:29 | 5527410 Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance's picture

So I guess you did not read the article because there is no stated 'belief' of anything including 'chemtrails'. Mostly it was an analysis of psyops and disinformation techniques. Hmmmm

Mon, 12/08/2014 - 03:30 | 5527560 weburke
weburke's picture

dear Cog, youll find them clouds afloatin  right next to and over the ocean also, its the need for heat me boy ! 

rather than say truth, I say why should I freak the regular folks. just move the molecules to boston strong, and put yourself out of a bunch of the harms way. the greatest show on earth, to me, is men fighting water with wind. fantastic. 

Sun, 12/07/2014 - 22:02 | 5527181 knukles
knukles's picture

Gentlemen, thank you.
I oft find myself retreating to asking whether the recommended tin foil hat need be grounded or not when engaging in conversations on said topic.  Mrs K and I see.
Blessings

Mon, 12/08/2014 - 02:03 | 5527714 ersatz007
ersatz007's picture

yes - both signal and chassis ground will be essential to survive the oncoming collapse.  you'll want to have a your tin foil hat (TFH device) wired with 8 guage copper to a 10 ft. long copper pole and have this in the ground at all times.  you probably want to also ground yourself to the public electrical grid via your breaker box.  actually, without proper grounding your TFH device doesn't even work as a shield. 

Mon, 12/08/2014 - 00:12 | 5527513 DeadFred
DeadFred's picture

Grounding is currently (pun intended) not needed. When the earth's magnetic field collapses as the flip starts grounding will be essential.

Sun, 12/07/2014 - 21:52 | 5527154 Lostinfortwalton
Lostinfortwalton's picture

Airplane contrails go back to WWII at least when the Allies avoided the con layer whenever possible for obvious reasons. The layer at which an airplane leaves a contrail is a function of the outside temperature and relative humidity. The temperature at altitude is relatively constant at the higher given altitude, the relative humidity is not. Sometimes it is even possible to climb out of a condensation layer. And some days the conditions are not present at any latitude for contrail formation.

Sun, 12/07/2014 - 21:56 | 5527164 Lostinfortwalton
Lostinfortwalton's picture

Should be "...any altitude for contrail formation". My bad.

Sun, 12/07/2014 - 22:06 | 5527186 agNau
agNau's picture

Sorry. I don't buy that explanation for years now.
With my own eyes I see contrail appear behind aircraft that was not there a second before. That explanation is debunked.
off/on.
off/on.
Within a seconds time.
Explain that.

Sun, 12/07/2014 - 23:23 | 5527396 Ocean22
Ocean22's picture

Not to mention that I sit here and watch this "contrail" expand and expand until it's a huge milky mist in the air covering a huge area. It's a contrail that never ever disappears. Bull. On off, usually near a front. Expanding and growing. You can see the particle streams on the wind currents. They are spraying alright.

Mon, 12/08/2014 - 01:22 | 5527668 newdoobie
newdoobie's picture

Take a psychometric class, it explains a whole lot of how and what happens. creating a contrail can be like dropping a seed crystal in water. Heat and humidity (grains of moisture in the air) it all comes together.

Mon, 12/08/2014 - 00:26 | 5527547 DeadFred
DeadFred's picture

As a kid in the 50s I was fascinated by contrails and studied them constantly. None ever made those ever-expanding trails that last for hours. Now I sometimes see videos posted by a guy fifty miles down wind from me showing the network of criss-crossed lines. The same air mass had none when it passed by me. His area doesn't have more flights at different altitudes, a fact which can be easily verified by the on-line flight trackers. Something is different. I believe that fully, what is different is the question and the scientist in me will wait for more data to decide. 

Mon, 12/08/2014 - 08:33 | 5528009 Lostinfortwalton
Lostinfortwalton's picture

There are more airplanes flying atbthe higher altitudes these days primarily because the commuter air lies have replaced their lower-flying turboprops with the jets like the Canadair CRJ. If an aircraft flies over point A northward and then point B and leaves a contrail, that contrail is stationary in the air mass. However the airmass itself is typically traveling west to east at speeds up to 150 miles an hour or greater. If another aircraft comes by a few minutes over the same route it will make another contrail. The contrail from the first airplane will be several miles east by then. multiply that several times and you have parallel contrails in the sky, typically the ones formed first deteriorating the most.

Sun, 12/07/2014 - 22:16 | 5527214 Lostinfortwalton
Lostinfortwalton's picture

The aircraft you saw was climbing to a higher altitude with colder air and began leaving a contrail as it entered the colder air.

Sun, 12/07/2014 - 22:21 | 5527229 agNau
agNau's picture

Nope.

Sun, 12/07/2014 - 22:59 | 5527335 Lostinfortwalton
Lostinfortwalton's picture

Yep. 40 years of aviation here, 20 as a pilot.

Sun, 12/07/2014 - 23:18 | 5527374 agNau
agNau's picture

Take a sheet of paper my 40 year pilot. From the top of that paper to the bottom draw two lines separated bY about an inch. Then bisect that line on 45degree angles five equal times.
This would be my view of the sky.
Those five lines represent the five times I see those separate ON/OFF
contrails occur. All five of those planes made an altitude adjustment and in one seconds time fully produced a very large contrail?
Don't buy it. Nope.
MANY miles of separation.
Same dissect to the main two.
Yet you say as simple as a slight altitude change?

Respectively I must say if you see what I see you would have to be retarded to make your comment.

Mon, 12/08/2014 - 00:11 | 5527510 Lostinfortwalton
Lostinfortwalton's picture

No "slight" altitude change at all. they were most probably doing an enroute climb at about 1,500 to 2,000 feet per minute. Also airline pilots see other airplanes passing above and beneath them all the time at 2,000 feet of separation. If an airliner was emitting anything other than exhaust out of the tailpipe (like vapor out of a wing vent) it would be reported to ATC as a possible dumping of fuel for an airplane in an emergency.

Sun, 12/07/2014 - 21:45 | 5527142 agNau
agNau's picture

From my geographic location(very active/regular) cloud building. I have no doubt.
The aircraft viewed will display no contrail, and then lightswitch present one. The offered explanation of colder areas of the atmosphere loses me there. The on/off, on/off, is seen from the "diagonal" flyers that cross the main "locomotives" flying long bulging smoke lines painted hours prior.
Most cases, as cloud cover presents, the diagonals will appear even more pronounced just above, and extending from edges into that formed cloud mass. ( Working at that point hidden. My guess would only be a guess as to what happens next.)
The turns seen made by these aircraft in my area would send passengers into frenzy if these were commercial aircraft.
So obvious, yet completely unnoticed by the masses.

* the most obvious, in your face, action by governments I have been watching for years, and virtually no alarms sounded. No questioning of authorities. What is it? What effect does it have on my children's health?
One of the simplest ways to break open their box of deception by bringing this front and center.
** Kudos on fine effort!

Sun, 12/07/2014 - 21:15 | 5527054 NevadaMirage
NevadaMirage's picture

LOL a fucking chemtrail article dressed up in a nice suit. They'll let anyone publish on Zerohedge these days if it gets clicks, hell it got mine. Consider the shark jumped.

Sun, 12/07/2014 - 21:10 | 5527033 VWAndy
VWAndy's picture

People that are pretending to aid your point by adding in falsities basicaly conflating your point. Opening the door to drag the topic onto a bad footing. Breaking the focus. Changing/reframing the question.

Sun, 12/07/2014 - 19:55 | 5526876 goose3
goose3's picture

You lost me at:

 

"Another twist to be aware of is Nexrad, a term often used to describe land-based electromagnetic facilities used together with aerosols to manufacture all of our weather. "

 

Yeah, they're manufacturing all our weather.  Do you even REALIZE how that sounds?  And how easily can we take ANYTHING else you say at face value?

Sun, 12/07/2014 - 21:21 | 5527061 Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance's picture

Here is the sentence in context.

"Another twist to be aware of is Nexrad, a term often used to describe land-based electromagnetic facilities used together with aerosols to manufacture all of our weather. We are informed it is used solely for this purpose; sometimes it is even promoted as weather warfare. However, there is no discussion of space weather impacts when discussing Nexrad and solar influences are never mentioned by those acting as a Gatekeeper for this issue."

Morpheus was describing how the term is often used, not what he believes is going on. In fact he says "....a term often used to describe..."

This is a classic case of someone (you) being triggered by something they read and rather than read it again to make sure it was understood properly, quickly runs to the comment section to leave a derogatory comment.

Welcome to the world of self mind control.

Sun, 12/07/2014 - 20:01 | 5526892 Morpheus_at_TIF
Morpheus_at_TIF's picture

I apologize if that was not clear. I don't claim that they're manufacturing all our weather. Instead, there are some groups/people providing "information" who claim that is the case. This is one way I am identifing them as either ingorant or influenced because they will not address or discuss other significant factors that affect our weather and climate.

Mon, 12/08/2014 - 00:37 | 5527582 DeadFred
DeadFred's picture

None of the AGW prediction models of the last couple decades use more than the most rudimentary inputs for solar radiation and coincidentally none of those models have been close to being correct. Big names are starting to defect though, they are losing the propaganda war.

Mon, 12/08/2014 - 00:41 | 5527593 Morpheus_at_TIF
Morpheus_at_TIF's picture

Yes, there are now more than 50 explanations for the 18 year pause in global warming. Thus the need to change it to climate change.

Sun, 12/07/2014 - 19:49 | 5526852 ebworthen
ebworthen's picture

Part of me agrees with you, but another part of me completely disagrees ;-)

"These methods are often employed in our political world to polarize an issue by creating false ‘choices’. We are either ‘Left’ or ‘Right’, ‘Conservative’ or ‘Liberal’, ‘Democrat or Republican’."

Bingo!  And Libertarian's are crazy.

The global warming meme ignores pollution and is meant to control and tax, not prevent damage to the environment.

Sun, 12/07/2014 - 19:55 | 5526870 Morpheus_at_TIF
Morpheus_at_TIF's picture

The global warming meme is being used for much more than control and tax- it furthers more complicated agendas and goals.

Sun, 12/07/2014 - 20:16 | 5526929 ebworthen
ebworthen's picture

I look forward to parts 2 and 3.

Sun, 12/07/2014 - 21:04 | 5527024 Morpheus_at_TIF
Morpheus_at_TIF's picture

Coming soon, posted fisrt at Two Ice Floes.

Sun, 12/07/2014 - 19:16 | 5526754 Ocean22
Ocean22's picture

Two years ago I began a quest to investigate completely the main " conspiracy theories" out there and try get some answers. The Chemtrail phenomena is quite REAL I can attest. A previous skeptic, the evidence is shocking and overwhelming. I now sit saying and watch planes spray out something that slowly turns my sky milky. Daily assaults up here ( Toronto)

These poisoners of our planet must be stopped. If they have nothing to hide, they should come clean and tell us the supposed reason for it. Their silence speaks volumes.

While the USA and Canada is in the middle of a cancer epidemic, is spraying all manner of chemicals in our air the smart thing to do ? Aluminum is one of the key ingredents that is being sprayed.

Why is Monsanto developing a aluminum resistant seeds? This is very telling. Monsanto is also buying up a ll the seed companies. Why ?

Why build a seed vault and bury it in frozen mountain ?

Some is very rotten and people better wake up fast before it's too late.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!