This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
The Biggest Secret In History: False Flag Terror
The age-old saying is true:
If we don’t learn history, we’re doomed to repeat it.
The single biggest historical secret which people haven’t yet learned is false flag terrorism.
There are many documented false flag attacks, where a government carries out a terror attack … and then falsely blames its enemy for political purposes.
False flag terror has changed the course of history over and over again … all over the world. Unless people learn about false flags, governments will carry them out to start more and more disastrous wars. (That’s why we continuously scour documents and sources to look for new admissions of false terror … and post updated lists when we find them.)
In the following instances, officials in the government which carried out the attack (or seriously proposed an attack) admit to it, either orally or in writing:
(1) Japanese troops set off a small explosion on a train track in 1931, and falsely blamed it on China in order to justify an invasion of Manchuria. This is known as the “Mukden Incident” or the “Manchurian Incident”. The Tokyo International Military Tribunal found: “Several of the participators in the plan, including Hashimoto [a high-ranking Japanese army officer], have on various occasions admitted their part in the plot and have stated that the object of the ‘Incident’ was to afford an excuse for the occupation of Manchuria by the Kwantung Army ….” And see this.
(2) A major with the Nazi SS admitted at the Nuremberg trials that – under orders from the chief of the Gestapo – he and some other Nazi operatives faked attacks on their own people and resources which they blamed on the Poles, to justify the invasion of Poland.
(3) Nazi general Franz Halder also testified at the Nuremberg trials that Nazi leader Hermann Goering admitted to setting fire to the German parliament building in 1933, and then falsely blaming the communists for the arson.
(4) Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev admitted in writing that the Soviet Union’s Red Army shelled the Russian village of Mainila in 1939 – while blaming the attack on Finland – as a basis for launching the “Winter War” against Finland. Russian president Boris Yeltsin agreed that Russia had been the aggressor in the Winter War.
(5) The Russian Parliament, current Russian president Putin and former Soviet leader Gorbachev all admit that Soviet leader Joseph Stalin ordered his secret police to execute 22,000 Polish army officers and civilians in 1940, and then falsely blamed it on the Nazis.
(6) The British government admits that – between 1946 and 1948 – it bombed 5 ships carrying Jews attempting to flee the Holocaust to seek safety in Palestine, set up a fake group called “Defenders of Arab Palestine”, and then had the psuedo-group falsely claim responsibility for the bombings (and see this, this and this).
(7) Israel admits that in 1954, an Israeli terrorist cell operating in Egypt planted bombs in several buildings, including U.S. diplomatic facilities, then left behind “evidence” implicating the Arabs as the culprits (one of the bombs detonated prematurely, allowing the Egyptians to identify the bombers, and several of the Israelis later confessed) (and see this and this).
(8) The CIA admits that it hired Iranians in the 1950′s to pose as Communists and stage bombings in Iran in order to turn the country against its democratically-elected prime minister.
(9) The Turkish Prime Minister admitted that the Turkish government carried out the 1955 bombing on a Turkish consulate in Greece – also damaging the nearby birthplace of the founder of modern Turkey – and blamed it on Greece, for the purpose of inciting and justifying anti-Greek violence.
(10) The British Prime Minister admitted to his defense secretary that he and American president Dwight Eisenhower approved a plan in 1957 to carry out attacks in Syria and blame it on the Syrian government as a way to effect regime change.
(11) The former Italian Prime Minister, an Italian judge, and the former head of Italian counterintelligence admit that NATO, with the help of the Pentagon and CIA, carried out terror bombings in Italy and other European countries in the 1950s and blamed the communists, in order to rally people’s support for their governments in Europe in their fight against communism. As one participant in this formerly-secret program stated: “You had to attack civilians, people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple. They were supposed to force these people, the Italian public, to turn to the state to ask for greater security” (and see this) (Italy and other European countries subject to the terror campaign had joined NATO before the bombings occurred). And watch this BBC special. They also allegedly carried out terror attacks in France, Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Greece, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, the UK, and other countries.
False flag attacks carried out pursuant tho this program include – by way of example only:
- The murder of the Turkish Prime Minister (1960)
- Bombings in Portugal (1966)
- The Piazza Fontana massacre in Italy (1969)
- Terror attacks in Turkey (1971)
- The Peteano bombing in Italy (1972)
- The Atocha massacre in Madrid, Spain (1977)
(12) In 1960, American Senator George Smathers suggested that the U.S. launch “a false attack made on Guantanamo Bay which would give us the excuse of actually fomenting a fight which would then give us the excuse to go in and [overthrow Castro]“.
(13) Official State Department documents show that, in 1961, the head of the Joint Chiefs and other high-level officials discussed blowing up a consulate in the Dominican Republic in order to justify an invasion of that country. The plans were not carried out, but they were all discussed as serious proposals.
(14) As admitted by the U.S. government, recently declassified documents show that in 1962, the American Joint Chiefs of Staff signed off on a plan to blow up AMERICAN airplanes (using an elaborate plan involving the switching of airplanes), and also to commit terrorist acts on American soil, and then to blame it on the Cubans in order to justify an invasion of Cuba. See the following ABC news report; the official documents; and watch this interview with the former Washington Investigative Producer for ABC’s World News Tonight with Peter Jennings.
(15) In 1963, the U.S. Department of Defense wrote a paper promoting attacks on nations within the Organization of American States – such as Trinidad-Tobago or Jamaica – and then falsely blaming them on Cuba.
(16) The U.S. Department of Defense even suggested covertly paying a person in the Castro government to attack the United States: “The only area remaining for consideration then would be to bribe one of Castro’s subordinate commanders to initiate an attack on Guantanamo.”
(17) The NSA admits that it lied about what really happened in the Gulf of Tonkin incident in 1964 … manipulating data to make it look like North Vietnamese boats fired on a U.S. ship so as to create a false justification for the Vietnam war.
(18) A U.S. Congressional committee admitted that – as part of its “Cointelpro” campaign – the FBI had used many provocateurs in the 1950s through 1970s to carry out violent acts and falsely blame them on political activists.
(19) A top Turkish general admitted that Turkish forces burned down a mosque on Cyprus in the 1970s and blamed it on their enemy. He explained: “In Special War, certain acts of sabotage are staged and blamed on the enemy to increase public resistance. We did this on Cyprus; we even burnt down a mosque.” In response to the surprised correspondent’s incredulous look the general said, “I am giving an example”.
(20) A declassified 1973 CIA document reveals a program to train foreign police and troops on how to make booby traps, pretending that they were training them on how to investigate terrorist acts:
The Agency maintains liaison in varying degrees with foreign police/security organizations through its field stations ….
[CIA provides training sessions as follows:]
a. Providing trainees with basic knowledge in the uses of commercial and military demolitions and incendiaries as they may be applied in terrorism and industrial sabotage operations.
b. Introducing the trainees to commercially available materials and home laboratory techniques, likely to he used in the manufacture of explosives and incendiaries by terrorists or saboteurs.
c. Familiarizing the trainees with the concept of target analysis and operational planning that a saboteur or terrorist must employ.
d. Introducing the trainees to booby trapping devices and techniques giving practical experience with both manufactured and improvised devices through actual fabrication.
***
The program provides the trainees with ample opportunity to develop basic familiarity and use proficiently through handling, preparing and applying the various explosive charges, incendiary agents, terrorist devices and sabotage techniques.
(21) The German government admitted (and see this) that, in 1978, the German secret service detonated a bomb in the outer wall of a prison and planted “escape tools” on a prisoner – a member of the Red Army Faction – which the secret service wished to frame the bombing on.
(22) A Mossad agent admits that, in 1984, Mossad planted a radio transmitter in Gaddaffi’s compound in Tripoli, Libya which broadcast fake terrorist trasmissions recorded by Mossad, in order to frame Gaddaffi as a terrorist supporter. Ronald Reagan bombed Libya immediately thereafter.
(23) The South African Truth and Reconciliation Council found that, in 1989, the Civil Cooperation Bureau (a covert branch of the South African Defense Force) approached an explosives expert and asked him “to participate in an operation aimed at discrediting the ANC [the African National Congress] by bombing the police vehicle of the investigating officer into the murder incident”, thus framing the ANC for the bombing.
(24) An Algerian diplomat and several officers in the Algerian army admit that, in the 1990s, the Algerian army frequently massacred Algerian civilians and then blamed Islamic militants for the killings (and see this video; and Agence France-Presse, 9/27/2002, French Court Dismisses Algerian Defamation Suit Against Author).
(25) The United States Army’s 1994 publication Special Forces Foreign Internal Defense Tactics Techniques and Procedures for Special Forces – updated in 2004 – recommends employing terrorists and using false flag operations to destabilize leftist regimes in Latin America. False flag terrorist attacks were carried out in Latin America and other regions as part of the CIA’s “Dirty Wars“. And see this.
(26) Similarly, a CIA “psychological operations” manual prepared by a CIA contractor for the Nicaraguan Contra rebels noted the value of assassinating someone on your own side to create a “martyr” for the cause. The manual was authenticated by the U.S. government. The manual received so much publicity from Associated Press, Washington Post and other news coverage that – during the 1984 presidential debate – President Reagan was confronted with the following question on national television:
At this moment, we are confronted with the extraordinary story of a CIA guerrilla manual for the anti-Sandinista contras whom we are backing, which advocates not only assassinations of Sandinistas but the hiring of criminals to assassinate the guerrillas we are supporting in order to create martyrs.
(27) An Indonesian fact-finding team investigated violent riots which occurred in 1998, and determined that “elements of the military had been involved in the riots, some of which were deliberately provoked”.
(28) Senior Russian Senior military and intelligence officers admit that the KGB blew up Russian apartment buildings in 1999 and falsely blamed it on Chechens, in order to justify an invasion of Chechnya (and see this report and this discussion).
(29) As reported by BBC, the New York Times, and Associated Press, Macedonian officials admit that the government murdered 7 innocent immigrants in cold blood and pretended that they were Al Qaeda soldiers attempting to assassinate Macedonian police, in order to join the “war on terror”.
(30) Senior police officials in Genoa, Italy admitted that – in July 2001, at the G8 summit in Genoa – planted two Molotov cocktails and faked the stabbing of a police officer, in order to justify a violent crackdown against protesters.
(31) The U.S. falsely blamed Iraq for playing a role in the 9/11 attacks – as shown by a memo from the defense secretary – as one of the main justifications for launching the Iraq war. Even after the 9/11 Commission admitted that there was no connection, Dick Cheney said that the evidence is “overwhelming” that al Qaeda had a relationship with Saddam Hussein’s regime, that Cheney “probably” had information unavailable to the Commission, and that the media was not ‘doing their homework’ in reporting such ties. Top U.S. government officials now admit that the Iraq war was really launched for oil … not 9/11 or weapons of mass destruction. Despite previous “lone wolf” claims, many U.S. government officials now say that 9/11 was state-sponsored terror; but Iraq was not the state which backed the hijackers. (Many U.S. officials have alleged that 9/11 was a false flag operation by rogue elements of the U.S. government; but such a claim is beyond the scope of this discussion. The key point is that the U.S. falsely blamed it on Iraq, when it knew Iraq had nothing to do with it.).
(32) Although the FBI now admits that the 2001 anthrax attacks were carried out by one or more U.S. government scientists, a senior FBI official says that the FBI was actually told to blame the Anthrax attacks on Al Qaeda by White House officials (remember what the anthrax letters looked like). Government officials also confirm that the white House tried to link the anthrax to Iraq as a justification for regime change in that country.
(33) According to the Washington Post, Indonesian police admit that the Indonesian military killed American teachers in Papua in 2002 and blamed the murders on a Papuan separatist group in order to get that group listed as a terrorist organization.
(34) The well-respected former Indonesian president also admits that the government probably had a role in the Bali bombings.
(35) Police outside of a 2003 European Union summit in Greece were filmed planting Molotov cocktails on a peaceful protester
(36) Former Department of Justice lawyer John Yoo suggested in 2005 that the US should go on the offensive against al-Qaeda, having “our intelligence agencies create a false terrorist organization. It could have its own websites, recruitment centers, training camps, and fundraising operations. It could launch fake terrorist operations and claim credit for real terrorist strikes, helping to sow confusion within al-Qaeda’s ranks, causing operatives to doubt others’ identities and to question the validity of communications.”
(37) Similarly, in 2005, Professor John Arquilla of the Naval Postgraduate School – a renowned US defense analyst credited with developing the concept of ‘netwar’ – called for western intelligence services to create new “pseudo gang” terrorist groups, as a way of undermining “real” terror networks. According to Pulitzer-Prize winning journalist Seymour Hersh, Arquilla’s ‘pseudo-gang’ strategy was, Hersh reported, already being implemented by the Pentagon:
“Under Rumsfeld’s new approach, I was told, US military operatives would be permitted to pose abroad as corrupt foreign businessmen seeking to buy contraband items that could be used in nuclear-weapons systems. In some cases, according to the Pentagon advisers, local citizens could be recruited and asked to join up with guerrillas or terrorists…
The new rules will enable the Special Forces community to set up what it calls ‘action teams’ in the target countries overseas which can be used to find and eliminate terrorist organizations. ‘Do you remember the right-wing execution squads in El Salvador?’ the former high-level intelligence official asked me, referring to the military-led gangs that committed atrocities in the early nineteen-eighties. ‘We founded them and we financed them,’ he said. ‘The objective now is to recruit locals in any area we want. And we aren’t going to tell Congress about it.’ A former military officer, who has knowledge of the Pentagon’s commando capabilities, said, ‘We’re going to be riding with the bad boys.’”
(38) United Press International reported in June 2005:
U.S. intelligence officers are reporting that some of the insurgents in Iraq are using recent-model Beretta 92 pistols, but the pistols seem to have had their serial numbers erased. The numbers do not appear to have been physically removed; the pistols seem to have come off a production line without any serial numbers. Analysts suggest the lack of serial numbers indicates that the weapons were intended for intelligence operations or terrorist cells with substantial government backing. Analysts speculate that these guns are probably from either Mossad or the CIA. Analysts speculate that agent provocateurs may be using the untraceable weapons even as U.S. authorities use insurgent attacks against civilians as evidence of the illegitimacy of the resistance.
(39) Undercover Israeli soldiers admitted in 2005 to throwing stones at other Israeli soldiers so they could blame it on Palestinians, as an excuse to crack down on peaceful protests by the Palestinians.
(40) Quebec police admitted that, in 2007, thugs carrying rocks to a peaceful protest were actually undercover Quebec police officers (and see this).
(41) A 2008 US Army special operations field manual recommends that the U.S. military use surrogate non-state groups such as “paramilitary forces, individuals, businesses, foreign political organizations, resistant or insurgent organizations, expatriates, transnational terrorism adversaries, disillusioned transnational terrorism members, black marketers, and other social or political ‘undesirables.’” The manual specifically acknowledged that U.S. special operations can involve both counterterrorism and “Terrorism” (as well as “transnational criminal activities, including narco-trafficking, illicit arms-dealing, and illegal financial transactions.”)
(42) At the G20 protests in London in 2009, a British member of parliament saw plain clothes police officers attempting to incite the crowd to violence.
(43) Egyptian politicians admitted (and see this) that government employees looted priceless museum artifacts in 2011 to try to discredit the protesters.
(44) A Colombian army colonel has admitted that his unit murdered 57 civilians, then dressed them in uniforms and claimed they were rebels killed in combat.
(45) The highly-respected writer for the Telegraph Ambrose Evans-Pritchard says that the head of Saudi intelligence – Prince Bandar – recently admitted that the Saudi government controls “Chechen” terrorists.
(46) High-level American sources admitted that the Turkish government – a fellow NATO country – carried out the chemical weapons attacks blamed on the Syrian government; and high-ranking Turkish government admitted on tape plans to carry out attacks and blame it on the Syrian government.
(47) The Ukrainian security chief admits that the sniper attacks which started the Ukrainian coup were carried out in order to frame others. Ukrainian officials admit that the Ukrainian snipers fired on both sides, to create maximum chaos.
(48) Britain’s spy agency has admitted (and see this) that it carries out “digital false flag” attacks on targets, framing people by writing offensive or unlawful material … and blaming it on the target.
(49) U.S. soldiers have admitted that if they kill innocent Iraqis and Afghanis, they then “drop” automatic weapons near their body so they can pretend they were militants
(50) Similarly, police frame innocent people for crimes they didn’t commit. The practice is so well-known that the New York Times noted in 1981:
In police jargon, a throwdown is a weapon planted on a victim.
Newsweek reported in 1999:
Perez, himself a former [Los Angeles Police Department] cop, was caught stealing eight pounds of cocaine from police evidence lockers. After pleading guilty in September, he bargained for a lighter sentence by telling an appalling story of attempted murder and a “throwdown”–police slang for a weapon planted by cops to make a shooting legally justifiable. Perez said he and his partner, Officer Nino Durden, shot an unarmed 18th Street Gang member named Javier Ovando, then planted a semiautomatic rifle on the unconscious suspect and claimed that Ovando had tried to shoot them during a stakeout.
Wikipedia notes:
As part of his plea bargain, Pérez implicated scores of officers from the Rampart Division’s anti-gang unit, describing routinely beating gang members, planting evidence on suspects, falsifying reports and covering up unprovoked shootings.
(As a side note – and while not technically false flag attacks – police have been busted framing innocent people in many other ways, as well.)
So Common … There’s a Name for It
A former U.S. intelligence officer recently alleged:
Most terrorists are false flag terrorists or are created by our own security services.
This might be an exaggeration (and – as shown above – the U.S. isn’t the only one to play this terrible game). The point is that it is a very widespread strategy.
Indeed, this form of deceit is so common that it was given a name hundreds of years ago.
“False flag terrorism” is defined as a government attacking its own people, then blaming others in order to justify going to war against the people it blames. Or as Wikipedia defines it:
False flag operations are covert operations conducted by governments, corporations, or other organizations, which are designed to appear as if they are being carried out by other entities. The name is derived from the military concept of flying false colors; that is, flying the flag of a country other than one’s own. False flag operations are not limited to war and counter-insurgency operations, and have been used in peace-time; for example, during Italy’s strategy of tension.
The term comes from the old days of wooden ships, when one ship would hang the flag of its enemy before attacking another ship. Because the enemy’s flag, instead of the flag of the real country of the attacking ship, was hung, it was called a “false flag” attack.
Indeed, this concept is so well-accepted that rules of engagement for naval, air and land warfare all prohibit false flag attacks. Specifically, the rules of engagement state that a military force can fly the enemy’s flag, imitate their markings, or dress in an enemy’s clothes … but that the ruse has to be discarded before attacking.
Why are the rules of engagement so specific? Obviously, because nations have been using false flag attacks for many centuries. And the rules of engagement are at least trying to limit false flag attacks so that they aren’t used as a false justification for war.
In other words, the rules of engagement themselves are an admission that false flag terrorism is a very common practice.
Leaders Throughout History Have Acknowledged False Flags
Leaders throughout history have acknowledged the danger of false flags:
“Terrorism is the best political weapon for nothing drives people harder than a fear of sudden death”.
– Adolph Hitler
“Why of course the people don’t want war … But after all it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship … Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”
– Hermann Goering, Nazi leader.
“The easiest way to gain control of a population is to carry out acts of terror. [The public] will clamor for such laws if their personal security is threatened”.
– Josef Stalin
Are you going to stay silent as your government implements the evil tactics of Hitler, Goering and Stalin? Or are you going to spread the word, and educate others as to history's crucial missing puzzle piece ... false flag terror?
- advertisements -


No. A personal attack would be to question his sexuality or refer to him as limp wrist or something as such. I'm trying to shame him into being a man and standing up for his bs.
I've asked him politely regarding his sources or the full context of his sources and he is the one who employs the tactics of name calling or referring to my time in service as his response.
All I wanted was an honest debate about facts and he won't do it. Why is that if he is so full of integrity?
I call him out on his own tactics that he blames other people for doing to him. Trolls is what he calls us who dare question his excellency.
Try it sometime and see what you get. Try asking him how he comes to the conclusion that dick Cheney clarifying that there was no order to shoot down flight 93 when there was a rumor that the order had been given was his justification that 9/11 was an inside job.
How can anybody say that with a straight face unless he is trying to deceive you? I've been putting up with this 9/11 inside job, Cheney and bush lied to go to war, building 7 was rigged to blow before hand and blah blah blah blah.
How can anybody say that with a straight face unless he is trying to deceive you? I've been putting up with this 9/11 inside job, Cheney and bush lied to go to war, building 7 was rigged to blow before hand and blah blah blah blah.
The topic is false flags in general but: This is an orange.
This is the circumstantial evidence for a bombing: 911, Israel, Van bombs and arrests, 911 truth without the Jones town kookiness
More on that evidence: 911 cover up condensed to 28mins :mainly info on the Israelis
For those with short attention spans: Iraq and 911 in Minutes
The anthrax attack pretext, more of the same sort of follow up to market War Inc. for Zionists. Ever wonder why nothing like that has occurred again in all these years? Not enough terrists out there?
And this fits the overall pattern that GW is referrring to, other than the likely false confessions that were tortured out of Nazis at Nuremberg. I wonder if he believes in the shrunken heads, the lampshades made of human skin, the human soap and other Jewish atrocity propaganda. You know, if they didn't do all that then much of what the allies did with respect to rounding Japanese and Germans up and putting them in camps and so on would be the same thing. So the Jews and oligarchs that incited and won World War II have to say that the Nazis were different. And perhaps they were some. But they weren't all that different. After all, that's why they invited them over in Operation Paperclip and so on.
You know who may have been a little different or a little more atrocious in their "war crimes"? The Japanese.
Curious that they were not held accountable for "war crimes" and other redundant thoughts. There were not enough shrunken heads and lampshades made out of human skin and human soap and other Jewish atrocity propaganda used against the Germans to go around, I'd imagine.
Politely? You've been politely asked to fuck off quite a few times, if this is your definition of polite.
So.
Refute his arguments with some facts of your own. Calling bullshit is not an argument, but it does place the onus on you to prove he is wrong.
Do enlighten us with specific details where he errs.
Failing to make your case just puts you in the contentious asshole category.
Do you still beat your wife?
Never have.
Next question?
All warfare is based on deception - Sun Tzu.
The "Sun Tzu" legend was probably a form of deception...
But in any case, true enough... War is Always by Deception
George you should ADMIT that you really don't know anything except that israel did it. You never ask WHY.
Once again your use of links is completely taken out of contex. Your NSA link about how we train the police to make booby traps was a training exercise to familiarize local law enforcement on detection and what to expect when faced with these devices.
You're about as pathetic as it gets. You are a gutless coward and a shill. But I'm glad u keep it because more and more people are seeing for the liar you are.
Come on George prove me wrong.
But you can't and you won't because your purpose is not to inform.
Assuming your are referencing item 20 on his list, NSA was not mentioned, "local" was foreign, etc... LOL.
It said NSA archive if you would bother to actually check the link smart guy.
http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB222/top10.pdf
I did ROFL! Do love the "we" part.
And your purpose is?
As usual GW's research is thorough... most of the trolls like yourself immediately use ad hominem atttacks as if "GW is an asshole" somehow negates the depth of his research. Why not try to refute his arguments with similarly researched arguments....
Shit's purpose here is to thread spool and dominate the conversation so no one can talk to each other, as well as making the article look like kook bait.
And I do refute his premises. He just never responds except with more links to his own site which I have questioned him about many times. Also his links that he provides are are taken out of context to make his point and I have ask for clarification them many times.
He just provides more links of his site or out of context garbage. He won't respond which is why I'm doing this.
He can either stand up for himself and face me so all of you can see who is right or wrong but he won't. If you think I like doing this you couldn't be more wrong.
He knows my beef with him. If you think I'm some troll with no purpose then ask george to face me so we can be done with it.
But that's not what the Tyler's want is it. Ask yourself what is GW's purpose because it isn't about informing that's for damn sure.
I suspect GW's purpose is, at least, honest, which is a lot more than can be said for yours.
Bullshit like 'He knows my beef with him. If you think I'm some troll with no purpose then ask george to face me so we can be done with it.' is total crap.
You would refuse to recognize logical argument if it bit you on the arse.
I likely won't be wasting any more time responding your comments, unless you up your game and come up with some really outrageous crap.
What's his purpose? GW purposefully takes out of context most things to then make a moral equivalence between America and these dictatorial regimes who will do anything to subvert or conquer. Unfortunately we have to meet them on the battle field and the agrees or sets the rules.
I don't like it as I'm sure you don't either. But if you tie your hands behind your back you are only insuring your own demise. And no we are not perfect because we have our own little dictators in our govt who wish to subvert it and go to certain measures to undermine it.
Ever hear of Benghazi? Thought so
What exactly does Benghazi have to do with the assassinations of the Kennedy brothers, Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr., Senator Wellstone's suspicous plane crash, the outing of Valerie Plame and the Brewster Jennings operation, etc., etc., etc., and most of all, 9/11?
Idiot . . .
Ah so thats it ..its all about Benghazi and Obama hate.
The US does use false flags and therefore is morally equivalent to its other practitioners.. The Gulf of Tonkin incident, The 9/11 tie to Saddam Hussein are but 2 of the many instances... sorry pal but sometime we are the bad guys.
You might pause to consider that in both of these bullshit inspired military interventions we got our asses royally kicked... Garbage In Garbage out.
I used the Benghazi reference to show you how there are those in our govt who actively work against their own country and people and not for some greater good. If you a president who is a communist but can't say that he is, he will do everything to convince the people that he's just like you, a capitalist American.
All the while he will be doing everything he can to subvert your country while claiming he's not.
Cloward piven is a great example. Promote welfare for the poor while knowing that you are trying to overload the system to collapse capitalism and the USA.
Couldn't you call that a false flag? Your jeers randomly of false flag Terror is very limited in scope and purposefully so.
Well I would call the Vietnam War and Iraq invasion relatively MAJOR in scope based on dollars spent, civilian and military body counts... but again rationality is not your strong suit.
You can call many things we do in our lives a false flag as it is a very popular way to promote our own agendas. However there are legal injunctions against perjury and slander and biblical injuctions (if you are so inclined) against bearing false witness. Both recognize that is injust and injurious to the object. Perhaps you should review your own charges against GW and Obama for traces of "false witness" in your enthusiasm to slander.
It's not about hate for obama, all though I do despise him. If you bother to read my previous comments regarding this issue and you will see what I'm talking about.
There are so many things regarding the Iraq war that many did not remember from he first gulf war and the legalities surrounding it. If the UN would do their job we never would have to deal with Iraq or Iran or any over tinhorn dictator in the world would we. Oil for food program was subverted and the money didn't go to the people of Iraq and it was the UN'a program. Much of that money went to our enemies and some allies like France.
But the UN is made up of mostly tinhorn dictators who hate America and Israel because we are democratic societies.
Check your own ability to rationalize because it's apparently absent with you. Especially with the name TRULY STUPID.
Your comment implies an ”interesting” definition of democracy: a privately owned monetary system, a two party political system (where both parties are virtually identical – apart from some irrelevant and symbolic differences on ‘gender, gay-rights, abortion’ and style -
i.e. Bush: I’m as dumb as you – vote for me! Obama: I can say many long words – vote for me!), a political process controlled and framed by oligarchs, few and theatrical elections (theatrical in the sense, that informed debate is scorned upon and ‘who would you rather drink a beer with’ is seen as the major/important question) etc.
There’s no doubt in my mind. US is already a full blown dictatorship. And the dictator is not the president – he’s just a servant of the oligarchs.
And no, Obama is not a communist. He don’t have any ideology or political ambition of his own. He does what he is told to do by his masters. The money masters.
If democracy is one man one vote, then what you’ve got in US is far from it. One dollar one vote, oh, yes – that’s what you’ve got. Mammoncracy.
So who's calling the shots? The 1% of the 2%?
(I don't disagree with you)
'Old money' = 0,01 %.
They hate us for our freedoms, obviously. I wouldn't be surprised if someday Irsael and the US are unanimously kicked out of the UN.
The common sheeple, like the domestic dog, are forever childlike dependent, first on their natural parents and later on their neo-parent, aka as the government. To imagine that their neo-parent would attack and harm them is forbidden thought.
As childlike novices, they want to believe in fairness, that the strong do not attack the weak, that there is justice, their neo-parent loves them and war brings justice. Most false flag attacks are justifications for the strong to attack the weaker.
To think, cui bono, to doubt, to not emote, to say NO, is the maturation of your intellect. Why should you and they die for the glory and increased power of some psychopath? End your mental dependency.
Non but ourselves can free our minds.
B. Marley.
<<The common sheeple, like the domestic dog, are forever childlike dependent, first on their natural parents and later on their neo-parent, aka as the government.>>
Well stated. Where the government education system leaves off, media and the entertainment industry take over. Both nourish a dependent and compliant character. "Everything is awesome, when you're part of the team."
<<To think, cui bono, to doubt, to not emote, to say NO, is the maturation of your intellect. Why should you and they die for the glory and increased power of some psychopath? End your mental dependency.>>
Enjoyed your whole comment, wish I had more upvotes.
"To imagine that their neo-parent would attack and harm them is forbidden thought."
Yet it happens every day on so many levels that the sheep cave in psychologically and exist in a constant state of denial.
GW, thanks for keeping this list.
thanks for keeping this list...
It would seem the only "acceptable" methods of violent resistance left for victims of "unprovoked" violent attacks by an opposing force are rock throwing, suicide marketplace detonations and other "random" acts of "terror".
Say what you will, I still pine for the days of my youth when the roots of the US establishment were celebrated in what’s considered sappy by today’s standards:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=YaxGNQE5ZLA
This is the story I will choose to remember whenever I hear this throughout the baseball season.
Jmo.
When tin foil hats call EVERYTHING a false flag, well, thats what makes them tin foil hats.
When false flags call EVERYTHING a tin foil hat, well, they hire trolls to say it. So MORE PAY for TROLLS!
"SAME PAY AS RUPERT and JEH!"
"SAME PAY AS RUPERT and JEH!"
"SAME PAY AS RUPERT and JEH!"
You describe paranoia. Once someone learns the history of what govs or gov entities have done and are willing to do, everything is questionable.
No, I describe tin foil hats. The more you call, "false flag" the less the credibility. Tin foil hats hurt there own cause. I take there rantings with the same grain of salt I take Government "truth".
Just because you are paranoid, it doesn't mean they'e NOT out to get you.
If your employer pays you by the "up" vote, you had best reconsider your tactics.
I'm not looking for hangers on but wear yourself out.
what about hilary's state department secret intel ops including supplying al queda with money, training and arms.... the murdered ambassador arranged 650 tons of arms via east europe and turkey for alqueda/isis in syria... wnat about the $5 billion obama gave qatar for isis as part of the berghdal traitor swap for 5 top level al queda... what about stupid going to give iran a nuke...and start ww3...
oh and he left off the gulf of tonkin hoax that justified viet nam.. when are the generals going to grow some balls and speak up instead of passively putting volunteers into the meat grider of no objective war..
keep in mind i do believe VIOLENCE SOLVES PROBLEMS .... IF USED PROPERLY
You lost me at Iran. Your last assertion confirms your current employment.
So hard to find work anymore since everyone does background checks and a FAWDW charge sticks out like a sore thumb.
Total insanity.
total insanity is yet to come
These acts amount to capital offenses of murder and treason at a level that is yet to be defined by law.
Perverse acts to insure job security and funding re-direction to enrich insiders at the ultimate cost to human life and families.
"We The People" need to find in ourselves what it takes in the form of courage and resolve to take back our corrupted republic and establish tribunals to eradicate all of the conspirators from the face of the earth.
The USS Liberty - deliberately attacked by Israel presumably intending to blame the sinking on Arab forces, thus drawing the US into the Israel-Arab war.
they lost a sub in retaliation. the navy may have done that without elite permission. That was back in the day of an american faction of the cia and fbi and certainly the navy. There were kennedy style military who knew he was killed. By the time bush and clintons were done, that faction was gone.
Really? Ever hear that the Captain of the Liberty admitted they were providing intelligence to the Egyptians? If they wanted to sink it they would have. They were warned that and then attacked. Isreal is a little different than us they CAN'T lose a war. You big false flag guys ever remember us betraying any of our other "allies" it's why we don't have any.
You and George don't have any other stories but this. Personally I believe all this is jealousy.
any proof to that claim?