This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

The Biggest Secret In History: False Flag Terror

George Washington's picture




 

The age-old saying is true:

If we don’t learn history, we’re doomed to repeat it.

The single biggest historical secret which people haven’t yet learned is false flag terrorism.

There are many documented false flag attacks, where a government carries out a terror attack … and then falsely blames its enemy for political purposes.

False flag terror has changed the course of history over and over again … all over the world.   Unless people learn about false flags, governments will carry them out to start more and more disastrous wars.   (That’s why we continuously scour documents and sources to look for new admissions of false terror … and post updated lists when we find them.)

In the following instances, officials in the government which carried out the attack (or seriously proposed an attack) admit to it, either orally or in writing:

(1) Japanese troops set off a small explosion on a train track in 1931, and falsely blamed it on China in order to justify an invasion of Manchuria. This is known as the “Mukden Incident” or the “Manchurian Incident”. The Tokyo International Military Tribunal found: “Several of the participators in the plan, including Hashimoto [a high-ranking Japanese army officer], have on various occasions admitted their part in the plot and have stated that the object of the ‘Incident’ was to afford an excuse for the occupation of Manchuria by the Kwantung Army ….” And see this.

(2) A major with the Nazi SS admitted at the Nuremberg trials that – under orders from the chief of the Gestapo – he and some other Nazi operatives faked attacks on their own people and resources which they blamed on the Poles, to justify the invasion of Poland.

(3) Nazi general Franz Halder also testified at the Nuremberg trials that Nazi leader Hermann Goering admitted to setting fire to the German parliament building in 1933, and then falsely blaming the communists for the arson.

(4) Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev admitted in writing that the Soviet Union’s Red Army shelled the Russian village of Mainila in 1939 – while blaming the attack on Finland – as a basis for launching the “Winter War” against Finland. Russian president Boris Yeltsin agreed that Russia had been the aggressor in the Winter War.

(5) The Russian Parliament, current Russian president Putin and former Soviet leader Gorbachev all admit that Soviet leader Joseph Stalin ordered his secret police to execute 22,000 Polish army officers and civilians in 1940, and then falsely blamed it on the Nazis.

(6) The British government admits that – between 1946 and 1948 – it bombed 5 ships carrying Jews attempting to flee the Holocaust to seek safety in Palestine, set up a fake group called “Defenders of Arab Palestine”, and then had the psuedo-group falsely claim responsibility for the bombings (and see this, this and this).

(7) Israel admits that in 1954, an Israeli terrorist cell operating in Egypt planted bombs in several buildings, including U.S. diplomatic facilities, then left behind “evidence” implicating the Arabs as the culprits (one of the bombs detonated prematurely, allowing the Egyptians to identify the bombers, and several of the Israelis later confessed) (and see this and this).

(8) The CIA admits that it hired Iranians in the 1950′s to pose as Communists and stage bombings in Iran in order to turn the country against its democratically-elected prime minister.

(9) The Turkish Prime Minister admitted that the Turkish government carried out the 1955 bombing on a Turkish consulate in Greece – also damaging the nearby birthplace of the founder of modern Turkey – and blamed it on Greece, for the purpose of inciting and justifying anti-Greek violence.

(10) The British Prime Minister admitted to his defense secretary that he and American president Dwight Eisenhower approved a plan in 1957 to carry out attacks in Syria and blame it on the Syrian government as a way to effect regime change.

(11) The former Italian Prime Minister, an Italian judge, and the former head of Italian counterintelligence admit that NATO, with the help of the Pentagon and CIA, carried out terror bombings in Italy and other European countries in the 1950s and blamed the communists, in order to rally people’s support for their governments in Europe in their fight against communism. As one participant in this formerly-secret program stated: “You had to attack civilians, people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple. They were supposed to force these people, the Italian public, to turn to the state to ask for greater security” (and see this) (Italy and other European countries subject to the terror campaign had joined NATO before the bombings occurred). And watch this BBC special. They also allegedly carried out terror attacks in France, Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Greece, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, the UK, and other countries.

False flag attacks carried out pursuant tho this program include – by way of example only:

(12) In 1960, American Senator George Smathers suggested that the U.S. launch “a false attack made on Guantanamo Bay which would give us the excuse of actually fomenting a fight which would then give us the excuse to go in and [overthrow Castro]“.

(13) Official State Department documents show that, in 1961, the head of the Joint Chiefs and other high-level officials discussed blowing up a consulate in the Dominican Republic in order to justify an invasion of that country. The plans were not carried out, but they were all discussed as serious proposals.

(14) As admitted by the U.S. government, recently declassified documents show that in 1962, the American Joint Chiefs of Staff signed off on a plan to blow up AMERICAN airplanes (using an elaborate plan involving the switching of airplanes), and also to commit terrorist acts on American soil, and then to blame it on the Cubans in order to justify an invasion of Cuba. See the following ABC news report; the official documents; and watch this interview with the former Washington Investigative Producer for ABC’s World News Tonight with Peter Jennings.

(15) In 1963, the U.S. Department of Defense wrote a paper promoting attacks on nations within the Organization of American States – such as Trinidad-Tobago or Jamaica – and then falsely blaming them on Cuba.

(16) The U.S. Department of Defense even suggested covertly paying a person in the Castro government to attack the United States: “The only area remaining for consideration then would be to bribe one of Castro’s subordinate commanders to initiate an attack on Guantanamo.”

(17) The NSA admits that it lied about what really happened in the Gulf of Tonkin incident in 1964 … manipulating data to make it look like North Vietnamese boats fired on a U.S. ship so as to create a false justification for the Vietnam war.

(18) A U.S. Congressional committee admitted that – as part of its “Cointelpro” campaign – the FBI had used many provocateurs in the 1950s through 1970s to carry out violent acts and falsely blame them on political activists.

(19) A top Turkish general admitted that Turkish forces burned down a mosque on Cyprus in the 1970s and blamed it on their enemy. He explained: “In Special War, certain acts of sabotage are staged and blamed on the enemy to increase public resistance. We did this on Cyprus; we even burnt down a mosque.” In response to the surprised correspondent’s incredulous look the general said, “I am giving an example”.

(20) A declassified 1973 CIA document reveals a program to train foreign police and troops on how to make booby traps, pretending that they were training them on how to investigate terrorist acts:

The Agency maintains liaison in varying degrees with foreign police/security organizations through its field stations  ….

[CIA provides training sessions as follows:]

 

a. Providing trainees with basic knowledge in the uses of commercial and military demolitions and incendiaries as they may be applied in terrorism and industrial sabotage operations.

 

b. Introducing the trainees to commercially available materials and home laboratory techniques, likely to he used in the manufacture of explosives and incendiaries by terrorists or saboteurs.

 

c. Familiarizing the trainees with the concept of target analysis and operational planning that a saboteur or terrorist must employ.

 

d. Introducing the trainees to booby trapping devices and techniques giving practical experience with both manufactured and improvised devices through actual fabrication.

 

***

 

The program provides the trainees with ample opportunity to develop basic familiarity and use proficiently through handling, preparing and applying the various explosive charges, incendiary agents, terrorist devices and sabotage techniques.

(21) The German government admitted (and see this) that, in 1978, the German secret service detonated a bomb in the outer wall of a prison and planted “escape tools” on a prisoner – a member of the Red Army Faction – which the secret service wished to frame the bombing on.

(22) A Mossad agent admits that, in 1984, Mossad planted a radio transmitter in Gaddaffi’s compound in Tripoli, Libya which broadcast fake terrorist trasmissions recorded by Mossad, in order to frame Gaddaffi as a terrorist supporter. Ronald Reagan bombed Libya immediately thereafter.

(23) The South African Truth and Reconciliation Council found that, in 1989, the Civil Cooperation Bureau (a covert branch of the South African Defense Force) approached an explosives expert and asked him “to participate in an operation aimed at discrediting the ANC [the African National Congress] by bombing the police vehicle of the investigating officer into the murder incident”, thus framing the ANC for the bombing.

(24) An Algerian diplomat and several officers in the Algerian army admit that, in the 1990s, the Algerian army frequently massacred Algerian civilians and then blamed Islamic militants for the killings (and see this video; and Agence France-Presse, 9/27/2002, French Court Dismisses Algerian Defamation Suit Against Author).

(25) The United States Army’s 1994 publication Special Forces Foreign Internal Defense Tactics Techniques and Procedures for Special Forces – updated in 2004 – recommends employing terrorists and using false flag operations to destabilize leftist regimes in Latin America. False flag terrorist attacks were carried out in Latin America and other regions as part of the CIA’s “Dirty Wars“. And see this.

(26) Similarly, a CIA “psychological operations” manual prepared by a CIA contractor for the Nicaraguan Contra rebels noted the value of assassinating someone on your own side to create a “martyr” for the cause. The manual was authenticated by the U.S. government. The manual received so much publicity from Associated Press, Washington Post and other news coverage that – during the 1984 presidential debate – President Reagan was confronted with the following question on national television:

At this moment, we are confronted with the extraordinary story of a CIA guerrilla manual for the anti-Sandinista contras whom we are backing, which advocates not only assassinations of Sandinistas but the hiring of criminals to assassinate the guerrillas we are supporting in order to create martyrs.

(27) An Indonesian fact-finding team investigated violent riots which occurred in 1998, and determined that “elements of the military had been involved in the riots, some of which were deliberately provoked”.

(28) Senior Russian Senior military and intelligence officers admit that the KGB blew up Russian apartment buildings in 1999 and falsely blamed it on Chechens, in order to justify an invasion of Chechnya (and see this report and this discussion).

(29) As reported by BBC, the New York Times, and Associated Press, Macedonian officials admit that the government murdered 7 innocent immigrants in cold blood and pretended that they were Al Qaeda soldiers attempting to assassinate Macedonian police, in order to join the “war on terror”.

(30) Senior police officials in Genoa, Italy admitted that – in July 2001, at the G8 summit in Genoa – planted two Molotov cocktails and faked the stabbing of a police officer, in order to justify a violent crackdown against protesters.

(31) The U.S. falsely blamed Iraq for playing a role in the 9/11 attacks – as shown by a memo from the defense secretary – as one of the main justifications for launching the Iraq war. Even after the 9/11 Commission admitted that there was no connection, Dick Cheney said that the evidence is “overwhelming” that al Qaeda had a relationship with Saddam Hussein’s regime, that Cheney “probably” had information unavailable to the Commission, and that the media was not ‘doing their homework’ in reporting such ties. Top U.S. government officials now admit that the Iraq war was really launched for oil … not 9/11 or weapons of mass destruction. Despite previous “lone wolf” claims, many U.S. government officials now say that 9/11 was state-sponsored terror; but Iraq was not the state which backed the hijackers. (Many U.S. officials have alleged that 9/11 was a false flag operation by rogue elements of the U.S. government; but such a claim is beyond the scope of this discussion. The key point is that the U.S. falsely blamed it on Iraq, when it knew Iraq had nothing to do with it.).

(32) Although the FBI now admits that the 2001 anthrax attacks were carried out by one or more U.S. government scientists, a senior FBI official says that the FBI was actually told to blame the Anthrax attacks on Al Qaeda by White House officials (remember what the anthrax letters looked like). Government officials also confirm that the white House tried to link the anthrax to Iraq as a justification for regime change in that country.

(33) According to the Washington Post, Indonesian police admit that the Indonesian military killed American teachers in Papua in 2002 and blamed the murders on a Papuan separatist group in order to get that group listed as a terrorist organization.

(34) The well-respected former Indonesian president also admits that the government probably had a role in the Bali bombings.

(35) Police outside of a 2003 European Union summit in Greece were filmed planting Molotov cocktails on a peaceful protester

(36) Former Department of Justice lawyer John Yoo suggested in 2005 that the US should go on the offensive against al-Qaeda, having “our intelligence agencies create a false terrorist organization. It could have its own websites, recruitment centers, training camps, and fundraising operations. It could launch fake terrorist operations and claim credit for real terrorist strikes, helping to sow confusion within al-Qaeda’s ranks, causing operatives to doubt others’ identities and to question the validity of communications.”

(37)  Similarly, in 2005, Professor John Arquilla of the Naval Postgraduate School – a renowned US defense analyst credited with developing the concept of ‘netwar’ – called for western intelligence services to create new “pseudo gang” terrorist groups, as a way of undermining “real” terror networks.  According to Pulitzer-Prize winning journalist Seymour Hersh, Arquilla’s ‘pseudo-gang’ strategy was, Hersh reported, already being implemented by the Pentagon:

“Under Rumsfeld’s new approach, I was told, US military operatives would be permitted to pose abroad as corrupt foreign businessmen seeking to buy contraband items that could be used in nuclear-weapons systems. In some cases, according to the Pentagon advisers, local citizens could be recruited and asked to join up with guerrillas or terrorists

The new rules will enable the Special Forces community to set up what it calls ‘action teams’ in the target countries overseas which can be used to find and eliminate terrorist organizations. ‘Do you remember the right-wing execution squads in El Salvador?’ the former high-level intelligence official asked me, referring to the military-led gangs that committed atrocities in the early nineteen-eighties. ‘We founded them and we financed them,’ he said. ‘The objective now is to recruit locals in any area we want. And we aren’t going to tell Congress about it.’ A former military officer, who has knowledge of the Pentagon’s commando capabilities, said, ‘We’re going to be riding with the bad boys.’”

(38) United Press International reported in June 2005:

U.S. intelligence officers are reporting that some of the insurgents in Iraq are using recent-model Beretta 92 pistols, but the pistols seem to have had their serial numbers erased. The numbers do not appear to have been physically removed; the pistols seem to have come off a production line without any serial numbers. Analysts suggest the lack of serial numbers indicates that the weapons were intended for intelligence operations or terrorist cells with substantial government backing. Analysts speculate that these guns are probably from either Mossad or the CIA. Analysts speculate that agent provocateurs may be using the untraceable weapons even as U.S. authorities use insurgent attacks against civilians as evidence of the illegitimacy of the resistance.

(39) Undercover Israeli soldiers admitted in 2005 to throwing stones at other Israeli soldiers so they could blame it on Palestinians, as an excuse to crack down on peaceful protests by the Palestinians.

(40) Quebec police admitted that, in 2007, thugs carrying rocks to a peaceful protest were actually undercover Quebec police officers (and see this).

(41)  A 2008 US Army special operations field manual recommends that the U.S. military use surrogate non-state groups such as “paramilitary forces, individuals, businesses, foreign political organizations, resistant or insurgent organizations, expatriates, transnational terrorism adversaries, disillusioned transnational terrorism members, black marketers, and other social or political ‘undesirables.’” The manual specifically acknowledged that U.S. special operations can involve both counterterrorism and “Terrorism” (as well as “transnational criminal activities, including narco-trafficking, illicit arms-dealing, and illegal financial transactions.”)

(42) At the G20 protests in London in 2009, a British member of parliament saw plain clothes police officers attempting to incite the crowd to violence.

(43) Egyptian politicians admitted (and see this) that government employees looted priceless museum artifacts in 2011 to try to discredit the protesters.

(44) A Colombian army colonel has admitted that his unit murdered 57 civilians, then dressed them in uniforms and claimed they were rebels killed in combat.

(45) The highly-respected writer for the Telegraph Ambrose Evans-Pritchard says that the head of Saudi intelligence – Prince Bandar – recently admitted that the Saudi government controls “Chechen” terrorists.

(46) High-level American sources admitted that the Turkish government – a fellow NATO country – carried out the chemical weapons attacks blamed on the Syrian government; and high-ranking Turkish government admitted on tape plans to carry out attacks and blame it on the Syrian government.

(47) The Ukrainian security chief admits that the sniper attacks which started the Ukrainian coup were carried out in order to frame others. Ukrainian officials admit that the Ukrainian snipers fired on both sides, to create maximum chaos.

(48) Britain’s spy agency has admitted (and see this) that it carries out “digital false flag” attacks on targets, framing people by writing offensive or unlawful material … and blaming it on the target.

(49) U.S. soldiers have admitted that if they kill innocent Iraqis and Afghanis, they then “drop” automatic weapons near their body so they can pretend they were militants

(50) Similarly, police frame innocent people for crimes they didn’t commit. The practice is so well-known that the New York Times noted in 1981:

In police jargon, a throwdown is a weapon planted on a victim.

Newsweek reported in 1999:

Perez, himself a former [Los Angeles Police Department] cop, was caught stealing eight pounds of cocaine from police evidence lockers. After pleading guilty in September, he bargained for a lighter sentence by telling an appalling story of attempted murder and a “throwdown”–police slang for a weapon planted by cops to make a shooting legally justifiable. Perez said he and his partner, Officer Nino Durden, shot an unarmed 18th Street Gang member named Javier Ovando, then planted a semiautomatic rifle on the unconscious suspect and claimed that Ovando had tried to shoot them during a stakeout.

Wikipedia notes:

As part of his plea bargain, Pérez implicated scores of officers from the Rampart Division’s anti-gang unit, describing routinely beating gang members, planting evidence on suspects, falsifying reports and covering up unprovoked shootings.

(As a side note – and while not technically false flag attacks – police have been busted framing innocent people in many other ways, as well.)

So Common … There’s a Name for It

A former U.S. intelligence officer recently alleged:

Most terrorists are false flag terrorists or are created by our own security services.

This might be an exaggeration (and – as shown above – the U.S. isn’t the only one to play this terrible game). The point is that it is a very widespread strategy.

Indeed, this form of deceit is so common that it was given a name hundreds of years ago.

“False flag terrorism” is defined as a government attacking its own people, then blaming others in order to justify going to war against the people it blames. Or as Wikipedia defines it:

False flag operations are covert operations conducted by governments, corporations, or other organizations, which are designed to appear as if they are being carried out by other entities. The name is derived from the military concept of flying false colors; that is, flying the flag of a country other than one’s own. False flag operations are not limited to war and counter-insurgency operations, and have been used in peace-time; for example, during Italy’s strategy of tension.

The term comes from the old days of wooden ships, when one ship would hang the flag of its enemy before attacking another ship. Because the enemy’s flag, instead of the flag of the real country of the attacking ship, was hung, it was called a “false flag” attack.

Indeed, this concept is so well-accepted that rules of engagement for naval, air and land warfare all prohibit false flag attacks. Specifically, the rules of engagement state that a military force can fly the enemy’s flag, imitate their markings, or dress in an enemy’s clothes … but that the ruse has to be discarded before attacking.

Why are the rules of engagement so specific? Obviously, because nations have been using false flag attacks for many centuries. And the rules of engagement are at least trying to limit false flag attacks so that they aren’t used as a false justification for war.

In other words, the rules of engagement themselves are an admission that false flag terrorism is a very common practice.

Leaders Throughout History Have Acknowledged False Flags

Leaders throughout history have acknowledged the danger of false flags:

“Terrorism is the best political weapon for nothing drives people harder than a fear of sudden death”.
– Adolph Hitler

 

“Why of course the people don’t want war … But after all it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship … Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”
– Hermann Goering, Nazi leader.

 

“The easiest way to gain control of a population is to carry out acts of terror. [The public] will clamor for such laws if their personal security is threatened”.
– Josef Stalin

 

Are you going to stay silent as your government implements the evil tactics of Hitler, Goering and Stalin? Or are you going to spread the word, and educate others as to history's crucial missing puzzle piece ... false flag terror?

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Tue, 04/07/2015 - 11:40 | 5966619 George Washington
George Washington's picture

Yup. The only reason I haven't added it to the list is that I haven't yet found an Israeli official who ADMITTED that Israel intended to frame Egypt.

Admiral Thomas H. Moorer – former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General of Marines Raymond G. Davis, Rear Admiral Merlin Staring, former Judge Advocate General of the Navy, and former U.S. ambassador to Saudi Arabia James E. Akins – held Israel to be culpable and suggested several theories for Israel’s possible motives, including the desire to blame Egypt and bring the U.S. into the Six Day War.

But those are U.S. officials. Anyone know of an ISRAELI official who said the same thing?

Tue, 04/07/2015 - 12:18 | 5966872 WOWurstupid
WOWurstupid's picture

Ever hear that the captain of the Liberty admitted that they were providing intelligence to the Egyptians and were warned to cease before they were fired on?  Do false flags involve stabbing your "allies" in the back gosh we have never done that, ever met a Yard? 

Tue, 04/07/2015 - 17:14 | 5968036 weburke
weburke's picture

just cause you say it does not make it true. 

Tue, 04/07/2015 - 08:14 | 5966181 thecrud
thecrud's picture

18) A U.S. Congressional committee admitted that – as part of its “Cointelpro” campaign – the FBI had used many provocateurs in the 1950s through 1970s to carry out violent acts and falsely blame them on political activists.

 

Not that long ago why are they not prosecuted.

Tue, 04/07/2015 - 08:10 | 5966175 wildbad
wildbad's picture

History 101 - The FED is private and controls the world via its illegitimate control over money.

Wed, 04/08/2015 - 09:16 | 5970243 Memedada
Memedada's picture

One little correction: they don’t control money (they own a lot of money, yes, but they don’t control it). They control ‘fiat’ – an illusion of money.

Wed, 04/08/2015 - 06:37 | 5969906 Memedada
Memedada's picture

Economics 101 – it’s, sadly, not history yet.

And yes, the whole system is privately owned. The state is a tool of the oligarchs. That’s also one of the reasons I wonder why so many ZH’er argue, that we live in a ‘socialist’- or ‘progressive’- or ‘left-wing’-controlled world. It’s so easily defined as fascism. The merging of private and public power.

I follow US politics - the theatre. I see it as an exercise in ‘knowing my enemy’. I have NOT SEEN ONE LEFT-WING political proposal, political advocate or political argument at all. There’s no understanding of what the ‘left-wing’ is. Yes, there’s a lot of opinion about the ‘perceived’ left-wing (all actors that in a European sense would be seen as moderate or extreme right-wing – like the Democratic party, NBC, CBS etc.).

Tue, 04/07/2015 - 07:09 | 5966086 SystemOfaDrown
SystemOfaDrown's picture

"If we don’t learn history, we’re doomed to repeat it." Right! How about -"If we don’t learn history, we’re doomed to be ignorant!" Many of fellow Americans rather watch FOX News than read a book. Don't belive me? Ask if we're a Democracy or a Republic, and see how wrong answers you'll get.

Tue, 04/07/2015 - 11:36 | 5966760 Shitgum Suicide
Shitgum Suicide's picture

Many Americans would rather watch ABC, CBS, NBC than read a book.

FIFY

Wed, 04/08/2015 - 11:08 | 5970773 Kirk2NCC1701
Kirk2NCC1701's picture

And yet,  many 'Mericans would rather play a video game than watch an educational program. 

Wed, 04/08/2015 - 09:19 | 5970257 Memedada
Memedada's picture

And the difference is? Do you actually see the US-MSM-landscape as providing alternative worldviews?

Tue, 04/07/2015 - 07:47 | 5966145 SoilMyselfRotten
SoilMyselfRotten's picture

20 years from now people will look back at 911 and say, 'you knobs watched a 47 story building simply fall down in 6 seconds and never asked any questions? No wonder your country fell apart'.

 

 

Tue, 04/07/2015 - 08:39 | 5966251 DocinPA
DocinPA's picture

QEInfinity will have a lot more to do with a collapse than Building 7.

Tue, 04/07/2015 - 08:18 | 5966192 thecrud
thecrud's picture

And yet somehow still vote for republicans. hmm you can have it both ways they did it or they did not.

No one else was in power.

Tue, 04/07/2015 - 11:02 | 5966658 Abaco
Abaco's picture

That's right - the entire power structure changes with every election </sarc>

Tue, 04/07/2015 - 17:49 | 5968203 sgt_doom
sgt_doom's picture

Exactly!  That's why Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, appointed Bush inner circle guy and family cousin, Marc Grossman, just as she appointed former Dick Cheney policy advisor, Victoria Nuland (whose hubby was a founding member of PNAC).

Geez, I think with the exceptions of Dick Cheney, George Weasel Bush and a few others, Obama has appointed pretty much all former Bushies!

He reappointed Robert Swan (Truesdale) Mueller III to be FBI director, he reappointed Robert Gates at SecDef, he appointed Gen. Clapper to be DNI, he was a member of Bush's fabricated-WMD-in-Iraq team. . .

Tue, 04/07/2015 - 09:50 | 5966445 Renfield
Renfield's picture

<<And yet somehow still vote for either mainstream government party.>>

FIFY.

Tue, 04/07/2015 - 19:07 | 5968486 logicalman
logicalman's picture

Some still vote.

 

Tue, 04/07/2015 - 09:12 | 5966339 willwork4food
willwork4food's picture

And yet somehow they still praise the name of Jesus every Sunday in spirit and in truth gun ho to fight the holy fight to guard America.

Unbelievable.

Tue, 04/07/2015 - 07:01 | 5966075 Fun Facts
Fun Facts's picture

911 aka the New Pearl Harbor or the Neocon PNAC Revolution was the Big Lie Technique played to perfection.

The Big lie
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A big lie (German: Große Lüge) is a propaganda technique. The expression was coined by Adolf Hitler, when he dictated his 1925 book Mein Kampf, about the use of a lie so "colossal" that no one would believe that someone "could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously." Hitler asserted the technique was used by Jews to unfairly blame Germany's loss in World War I on German Army officer Erich Ludendorff.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Lie

Tue, 04/07/2015 - 12:07 | 5966841 KnuckleDragger-X
KnuckleDragger-X's picture

Sociopath's can pass lie detector tests because they are capable of wholly believing their own lies. Governments have been doing this forever but ours seem to have the ability to pick the worst possible thing, in the worst possible way, then push it to the bitter end....

Tue, 04/07/2015 - 07:01 | 5966055 BoPeople
BoPeople's picture

If one looks only at the effects since 9/11 then one would have to assume that the internet and the information that has been put on it has been either:

A. A countering force to the evil and tyrannical power behind our out of control and self-serving governments, which has alerted people to false flag terrorism.

or

B. Used by the self-serving and out of control governments themselves to undermine trust between government and the people and to foment conflict ... for some future purpose.

For clearly millions and more likely tens of millions ... possibly hundreds of millions of people are now aware how their own governments trick the people into wars and how they control them through false flag terror. It is now virtually common knowledge ... which concerns me.

My fear is that the people's ire will be directed at the wrong villain and the hidden power will succeed in once again at pitting man against man. Because, our true war is not against man or any being, but against our own instincts and the self-made fear and ego that control us. Everything else is a distraction.

Tue, 04/07/2015 - 09:48 | 5966429 Renfield
Renfield's picture

C. Both of the above.

Much like the gun, the internet is an amazing tool and example of human achievement. It can be used for great good or great evil depending on the hands using it.

<<For clearly millions and more likely tens of millions ... possibly hundreds of millions of people are now aware how their own governments trick the people into wars and how they control them through false flag terror. It is now virtually common knowledge ... which concerns me.>>

Why does it concern you? I'm not saying you're wrong to be concerned. Certainly our trust in government has been undermined, perhaps for good. Is this a bad thing?

<<My fear is that the people's ire will be directed at the wrong villain and the hidden power will succeed in once again at pitting man against man. Because, our true war is not against man or any being, but against our own instincts and the self-made fear and ego that control us. Everything else is a distraction.>>

Which is why we need more people like you staying on the internet, using it for good informative purpose, so that the voices of misinformation and agenda, which are certainly not going away, will be balanced by the presence of those who speak the truth, and by those who question.

I think the biggest danger of the internet is that it will become a medium for the ruling classes alone, but I honestly don't think this will happen. The same worry accompanied the invention of the printing press, but despite the lies and misinformation published, it became a tool of mass education. I do regard the internet as an evolution of the printing press - as long as we vigilantly protect our power to self-publish on it, and refuse to be intimidated into giving up this publishing power. Like any writer, we should be careful of what we publish... the mental discipline of this isn't necessarily a bad thing.

Tue, 04/07/2015 - 06:46 | 5966053 ConfederateH
ConfederateH's picture

all wars are zionist wars

“If my sons did not want wars, there would be none.” Gutle Schnaper Rothschild

Tue, 04/07/2015 - 17:00 | 5967977 August
August's picture

Just for the record, George, Herr Goering is said by a third party to have admitted that he set the Reichstag Fire.

Just like Moochelle admitted to me a few years ago that she is actually a trannie.  Would I lie?

Tue, 04/07/2015 - 20:30 | 5968748 caconhma
caconhma's picture

Unfortunately, the author knows very little about the Nuremberg trials. 

These trials were conceived at the Yalta conference with FDR, Churchill, and Stalin participation. These were pure "show trials" in the best Stalin traditions of Soviet show trials when hundreds on thousands of innocent people under torture have admitted committing most outrageous and ridiculous crimes and sentenced to death. After Stalin's death, the Soviet Union admitted that the overwhelming majority of convicted and executed people were innocent.

Now back to the Nuremberg trials. Before the trial, FDR, Churchill, and Stalin have agreed to the "rules" for the Nuremberg trials:

  • The trial will be exclusively limited to discrediting Nazi Germany and convicting Nazi leadership in committing war crimes against humanity
  • The Soviet wars of aggression against Finland and Poland will not be ever mentioned. [Under the secret Molotov-Ribbentop Pact Protocols, the Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union agreed jointly invade, destroy, and divide Poland between each other accordingly to the attached map. Following the Poland defeat, Nazi and Soviet conducted a combined victory parade (one can find the video of this parade in Sept. 1939 on YouTube).]
  • The US and British crimes against civilian German population including deliberate barbaric bombing of German civilian targets also will not be ever mentioned as well as deliberate starving to death of over 1 million of German POW by US occupation administration
  • Accused Germans will not allow to make any references and/or discussed any agreements between the Nazi Germany and the Allies prior to the War.


Summary 

The Nuremberg trials were "show trials" with nothing to do with Justice and/or Humanity. No wonder, with time, many crimes Nazi were convicted at the Nuremberg trial were found to be "in error". Remember lampshades made from human skin? Well, "these crimes" were quietly removed from the Nuremberg trial protocols.

Tue, 04/07/2015 - 23:34 | 5969533 AlaricBalth
AlaricBalth's picture

Could not agree with you more. Just watched the film "Judgement at Nuremberg" again , and as much as I enjoy it as a cinematic classic, it is nothing but a pure propaganda piece right from Goebbels textbook.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!