This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
HEAD of the FBI’s Anthrax Investigation Says the Whole Thing Was a SHAM
Agent In Charge of Amerithrax Investigation Blows the Whistle
The FBI head agent in charge of the anthrax investigation - Richard Lambert - has just filed a federal whistleblower lawsuit calling the entire FBI investigation bullsh!t:
In the fall of 2001, following the 9/11 attacks, a series of anthrax mailings occurred which killed five Americans and sickened 17 others. Four anthrax-laden envelopes were recovered which were addressed to two news media outlets in New York City (the New York Post and Tom Brokaw at NBC) and two senators in Washington D.C. (Patrick Leahy and Tom Daschle). The anthrax letters addressed to New York were mailed on September 18, 2001, just seven days after the 9/11 attacks. The letters addressed to the senators were mailed 21 days later on October 9, 2001. A fifth mailing of anthrax is believed to have been directed to American Media, Inc. (AMI) in Boca Raton, Florida based upon the death of one AMI employee from anthrax poisoning and heavy spore contamination in the building.
Executive management at FBI Headquarters assigned responsibility for the anthrax investigation (code named “AMERITHRAX”) to the Washington Field Office (WFO), dubbing it the single most important case in the FBI at that time. In October 2002, in the wake of surging media criticism, White House impatience with a seeming lack of investigative progress by WFO, and a concerned Congress that was considering revoking the FBI’s charter to investigate terrorism cases, Defendant FBI Director Mueller reassigned Plaintiff from the FBI’s San Diego Field Office to the Inspection Division at FBI Headquarters and placed Plaintiff in charge of the AMERITHRAX case as an “Inspector.” While leading the investigation for the next four years, Plaintiff’s efforts to advance the case met with intransigence from WFO’s executive management, apathy and error from the FBI Laboratory, politically motivated communication embargos from FBI Headquarters, and yet another preceding and equally erroneous legal opinion from Defendant Kelley – all of which greatly obstructed and impeded the investigation.
On July 6, 2006, Plaintiff provided a whistleblower report of mismanagement to the FBI’s Deputy Director pursuant to Title 5, United States Code, Section 2303. Reports of mismanagement conveyed in writing and orally included: (a) WFO’s persistent understaffing of the AMERITHRAX investigation; (b) the threat of WFO’s Agent in charge to retaliate if Plaintiff disclosed the understaffing to FBI Headquarters; (c) WFO’s insistence on staffing the AMERITHRAX investigation principally with new Agents recently graduated from the FBI Academy resulting in an average investigative tenure of 18 months with 12 of 20 Agents assigned to the case having no prior investigative experience at all; (d) WFO’s eviction of the AMERITHRAX Task Force from the WFO building in downtown Washington and its relegation to Tysons Corner, Virginia to free up space for Attorney General Ashcroft’s new pornography squads; (e) FBI Director’s Mueller’s mandate to Plaintiff to “compartmentalize” the AMERITHRAX investigation by stove piping the flow of case information and walling off task force members from those aspects of the case not specifically assigned to them – a move intended to stem the tide of anonymous media leaks by government officials regarding details of the investigation. [Lambert complained about compartmentalizing and stovepiping of the investigation in a 2006 declaration. See this, this and this]
This sequestration edict decimated morale and proved unnecessary in light of subsequent civil litigation which established that the media leaks were attributable to the United States Attorney for the District of the District of Columbia and to a Supervisory Special Agent in the FBI’s National Press Office, not to investigators on the AMERITHRAX Task Force; (f) WFO’s diversion and transfer of two Ph.D. Microbiologist Special Agents from their key roles in the investigation to fill billets for an 18 month Arabic language training program in Israel; (g) the FBI Laboratory’s deliberate concealment from the Task Force of its discovery of human DNA on the anthrax-laden envelope addressed to Senator Leahy and the Lab’s initial refusal to perform comparison testing; (h) the FBI Laboratory’s refusal to provide timely and adequate scientific analyses and forensic examinations in support of the investigation; (i) Defendant Kelley’s erroneous and subsequently quashed legal opinion that regulations of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) precluded the Task Force’s collection of evidence in overseas venues; (j) the FBI’s fingering of Bruce Ivins as the anthrax mailer; and, (k) the FBI’s subsequent efforts to railroad the prosecution of Ivins in the face of daunting exculpatory evidence.
Following the announcement of its circumstantial case against Ivins, Defendants DOJ and FBI crafted an elaborate perception management campaign to bolster their assertion of Ivins’ guilt. These efforts included press conferences and highly selective evidentiary presentations which were replete with material omissions. Plaintiff further objected to the FBI’s ordering of Plaintiff not to speak with the staff of the CBS television news magazine 60 Minutes or investigative journalist David Willman, after both requested authorization to interview Plaintiff.
In April 2008, some of Plaintiff’s foregoing whistleblower reports were profiled on the CBS television show 60 Minutes. This 60 Minutes segment was critical of FBI executive management’s handling of the AMERITHRAX investigation, resulting in the agency’s embarrassment and the introduction of legislative bills calling for the establishment of congressional inquiries and special commissions to examine these issues – a level of scrutiny the FBI’s Ivins attribution could not withstand.
After leaving the AMERITHRAX investigation in 2006, Plaintiff continued to publicly opine that the quantum of circumstantial evidence against Bruce Ivins was not adequate to satisfy the proof-beyond-a-reasonable doubt threshold required to secure a criminal conviction in federal court. Plaintiff continued to advocate that while Bruce Ivins may have been the anthrax mailer, there is a wealth of exculpatory evidence to the contrary which the FBI continues to conceal from Congress and the American people.
Exonerating Evidence for Ivins
Agent Lambert won't publicly disclose the exculpatory evidence against Ivins. As the New York Times reports:
[Lambert] declined to be specific, saying that most of the information was protected by the Privacy Act and was unlikely to become public unless Congress carried out its own inquiry.
But there is already plenty of exculpatory evidence in the public record.
- Handwriting analysis failed to link the anthrax letters to known writing samples from Ivins
- No textile fibers were found in Ivins’ office, residence or vehicles matching fibers found on the scotch tape used to seal the envelopes
- No pens were found matching the ink used to address the envelopes
- Samples of his hair failed to match hair follicles found inside the Princeton, N.J., mailbox used to mail the letters
- No souvenirs of the crime, such as newspaper clippings, were found in his possession as commonly seen in serial murder cases
- The FBI could not place Ivins at the crime scene with evidence, such as gas station or other receipts, at the time the letters were mailed in September and October 2001
- Lab records show the number of late nights Ivins put in at the lab first spiked in August 2001, weeks before the 9/11 attacks
As noted above, the FBI didn't want to test the DNA sample found on the anthrax letter to Senator Leahy. In addition, McClatchy points out:
After locking in on Ivins in 2007, the bureau stopped searching for a match to a unique genetic bacterial strain scientists had found in the anthrax that was mailed to the Post and to NBC News anchor Tom Brokaw, although a senior bureau official had characterized it as the hottest clue to date.
Anthrax vaccine expert Meryl Nass. M.D., notes:
The FBI’s alleged motive is bogus. In 2001, Bioport’s anthrax vaccine could not be (legally) relicensed due to potency failures, and its impending demise provided room for Ivins’ newer anthrax vaccines to fill the gap. Ivins had nothing to do with developing Bioport’s vaccine, although in addition to his duties working on newer vaccines, he was charged with assisting Bioport to get through licensure.
***
The FBI report claims the anthrax letters envelopes were sold in Frederick, Md. Later it admits that millions of indistinguishable envelopes were made, with sales in Maryland and Virginia.
***
FBI emphasizes Ivins’ access to a photocopy machine, but fails to mention it was not the machine from which the notes that accompanied the spores were printed.
FBI Fudged the Science
16 government labs had access to the same strain of anthrax as used in the anthrax letters.
The FBI admitted that up to 400 people had access to flask of anthrax in Dr. Ivins' lab. In other words, even if the killer anthrax came from there, 399 other people might have done it.
Moreover, even the FBI's claim that the killer anthrax came from Ivins' flask has completely fallen apart. Specifically, both the National Academy of Science and the Government Accountability Office - both extremely prestigious, nonpartisan agencies - found that FBI’s methodology and procedures for purportedly linking the anthrax flask maintained by Dr. Ivins with the anthrax letters was sloppy, inconclusive and full of holes. They found that the alleged link wasn’t very strong ... and that there was no firm link. Indeed, the National Academy of Sciences found that the anthrax mailed to Congressmen and the media could have come from a different source altogether than the flask maintained by Ivins.
Additionally, the Ft. Detrick facility - where Ivins worked - only handled liquid anthrax. But the killer anthrax was a hard-to-make dry powder form of anthrax. Ft. Detrick doesn't produce dry anthrax; but other government labs - for example Dugway (in Utah) and (Batelle (in Ohio) - do.
The anthrax in the letters was also incredibly finely ground; and the FBI’s explanation for how the anthrax became so finely ground doesn't even pass the smell test.
Further, the killer anthrax in the letters had a very high-tech anti-static coating so that the anthrax sample “floated off the glass slide and was lost” when scientists tried to examine it. Specifically, the killer anthrax was coated with polyglass and each anthrax spore given an electrostatic charge, so that it would repel other spores and “float”. This was very advanced bio-weapons technology to which even Ivins' bosses said he didn't have access.
Top anthrax experts like Richard Spertzel say that Ivins didn’t do it. Spertzel also says that only 4 or 5 people in the entire country knew how to make anthrax of the "quality" used in the letters, that Spertzel was one of them, and it would have taken him a year with a full lab and a staff of helpers to do it. As such, the FBI's claim that Ivins did it alone working a few nights is ludicrous.
Moreover, the killer anthrax contained silicon ... but the anthrax in Ivins’ flask did not. The FBI claimed the silicon present in the anthrax letters was absorbed from its surroundings … but Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories completely debunked that theory. In other words, silicon was intentionally added to the killer anthrax to make it more potent. Ivins and Ft. Detrick didn't have that capability ... but other government labs did.
Similarly, Sandia National Lab found the presence of iron and tin in the killer anthrax … but NOT in Ivins' flask of anthrax.
Sandia also found that there was a strain of bacteria in one of the anthrax letters not present in Ivins’ flask. (The bacteria, iron, tin and silicon were all additives which made the anthrax in the letters more deadly.)
The Anthrax Frame Up
Ivins wasn't the first person framed for the anthrax attacks ...
Although the FBI now admits that the 2001 anthrax attacks were carried out by one or more U.S. government scientists, a senior FBI official says that the FBI was actually told to blame the Anthrax attacks on Al Qaeda by White House officials (remember what the anthrax letters looked like). Government officials also confirm that the white House tried to link the anthrax to Iraq as a justification for regime change in that country. And see this.
People don't remember now, but the “war on terror” and Iraq war were largely based on the claim that Saddam and Muslim extremists were behind the anthrax attacks (and see this and this)
And the anthrax letters pushed a terrified Congress into approving the Patriot Act without even reading it. Coincidentally, the only Congressmen who received anthrax letters were the ones who were likely to oppose the Patriot Act.
And - between the bogus Al Qaeda/Iraq claims and the FBI's fingering of Ivins as the killer - the FBI was convinced that another U.S. government scientist, Steven Hatfill, did it. The government had to pay Hatfill $4.6 million to settle his lawsuit for being falsely accused.
Ivins' Convenient Death
It is convenient for the FBI that Ivins died.
The Wall Street Journal points out:
No autopsy was performed [on Ivins], and there was no suicide note.
Dr. Nass points out:
FBI fails to provide any discussion of why no autopsy was performed, nor why, with Ivins under 24/7 surveillance from the house next door, with even his garbage being combed through, the FBI failed to notice that he overdosed and went into a coma. Nor is there any discussion of why the FBI didn’t immediately identify tylenol as the overdose substance, and notify the hospital, so that a well-known antidote for tylenol toxicity could be given (N-acetyl cysteine, or alternatively glutathione). These omissions support the suggestion that Ivins’ suicide was a convenience for the FBI. It enabled them to conclude the anthrax case, in the absence of evidence that would satisfy the courts.
Indeed, one of Ivins’ colleagues at Ft. Deitrich thinks he was murdered.
Whether murder or suicide, Ivins' death was very convenient for the FBI, as dead men can't easily defend themselves.
- advertisements -


collapse in pancake fasion, all the way to the bottom, with less an less load above,
How can it be less and less load when pancaking down - do the already collapsed parts completely turn into dust that gets blown away by the wind?
You might never believe it, but that kind of unravelling approach actually makes you a useful idiot to TPTB.
I ask every unraveler such as you:
Does it matter if the buildings were brought down by internally planted devices, or by jets flown into them by terror suspects deliberately ignored by all three letter agencies, or by green marsians?
Precisely. Whatever happened on 911, it was not sufficient to get the US Patriot Act passed. It took the Anthrax attack against key political opponents for that pre-prepared Act to be passed. The Anthrax attack was the Reichstag fire, not 911.
Yes, because Congress was shitting their britches. If it doesn't affect them they don;t give a shit.
"Why did the two towers collapse, as seen in the footage, below the impact zones?"
Precisely. Impossible w/o a controlled demolition. It would have been a jagged mess. Then, tell them to check out the videos of WT7.Tales From The Church Committee
http://www.aarclibrary.org/publib/church/reports/contents.htm
How does one file a Federal Whistleblower Lawsuit? I'd like to know.
Any Lawyers and Clients of Lawyers out here in ZH Land? Thanks.
First you get a lawyer that wants to add to his resume.
there isn't "One" whistleblower lawsuit, there are a dozen different whistleblower protections
statutes.
If you are in Aviation and transport it's one type, if you are in Law Enforcement and Intelligence it's
non existent. If you are a Government contractor, it's another.
You need to be in a defined field, specify the type of activity you did and the type of retribution,
and you have a process. Typically you file a complaint with the DOL and then you wait and if they
don't give you a finding, then you need to sue.
The only sane(ish) way to be a whitleblower is to have all the info you have in as many relaiable hands as possible before you stick your neck out.
Even then you might get whacked, but at least your info remains available.
Still a tough decision to have to make.
No, to a whistleblower you have to have first a concience and secondly a set of balls. Everything else falls into place.
I thought that part was a given - I was describing the way things would have to fall in place to have any chance of success.
I've been trying for awhile. I called the Inspectors General of the DoD and the Navy; but the Navy Command I worked for spun its way out of it somehow with slapped wrists. Friends/Family of the Perps are still stalking/interfering/harassing many of my activities - including Job hunting, etc..
I went to the DOL for one of the "Hire to be Fired" employment scams I was trapped in for a small Air Force Contractor in El Segundo. Obtained a Right to Sue; but no Lawyer wanted to take a slam dunk Case. I had a group of stalking Cult Monkeys and Thugs who apparently intimidated a good number of Lawyers whom I contacted.
Thug groups were hanging around Torrance/Gardena/Carson/Compton/Redondo/RPV. Once actually was "standing watch" near my house; and boasted into his Cell about intimidating Lawyers.
After I tipped off the FBI and posted it on Facebook, there was series of mass 'evictions/movings' in the street where I lived. One Negro commented that he was helping a Family (Same Surname as an Enlisted Conduct Case on my Ship - from what I gather, that Family has been stalking since the Conduct Case was written up for Assault (I actually helped the Guy out as Paymaster when he was chastised by the CO for non-support of Dependents (Taboo in the Military for starving your Family of Pay - you get "adv pay" to have that check sent home directly - plus neg karma points.) by stretching out his repayment schedule.
Several Racketeers who participated in the Whistleblowier Retaliation are being prosecuted, from what I gather. The problem is, no one is telling ME about it. They Cult Monkeys (and their Police/Politician Buddies) have made me a "Person of Interest"; and a Lab Rat for their Behavioral Analyst/Psy War/Religious Conversion/Criminal Science Experiments.
It's annoying to have stalking Cult Monkeys know more about the situation than I; but they managed to keep some of it confined to some Mock Trial, Canon/Church/Rabbinical/Cult/LawSchool Courts - while briefing my Mother/Brother on a few issues.
Meanwhile some "researchers" seem to be running a scam Study and Civil Disobedience "Flash Mob" Racket whenever I head out to several of my Mothers' Med Appts (lately around UCLA), at the Los Angeles Air Force Base(Koreans, Black Masons, local Police Chief led), and the VA Med Ctr in Long Beach.
I even reported this directly to the FBI; and had a few interviews - including a briefing after a few years. Turns out that when I started to actually go to the FBI Bldg, one or more Mormons (one time, filled up an entire reception area as part of a Church Class). The Fed Agent informed me that it was out of their Jurisdiction. (WTF?) California's CBI was allegedly involved; but they seem to be trying to cover it up.
I found it interesting to see a copy of the actual Lawsuit filed by the Fed Employee.
I'm looking for Media Contacts on this one as well. It's so FUBAR'd with obvious participants - including a few
Sounds like we have some Religious/Ethnic/Political "Hate Crime" Elements (several skin heads, reconquistas, VNMese/TWNese/ HKGese/SGPorian/JPNeseUSAmericans, Liberal/Greenpeace mentioned - with an emphasis that a good deal of this is taking place in Maxine Waters' District and in other locations.
Now, I'm focused on leaving and continuing my work abroad, so there are now "We don't want him to Leave, so we'll interfere until he changes his mind" set of Idiot factions involved.
People wonder WHY Companies are leaving California and/or the USA, and WHY People are not only leaving California; but are renouncing their Citizenship from the USA.
Any more leads are appreciated. Thanks.
Deepwater Horizon was HAARP targeting glitch because of the I Love You virus. FukuIlluminatiContrailsConfirmed. Marie Osmond pledged her life to Satan in '78 for fame and stardom.
There you go, now the Grande WhackAthon is GO for this weekend, George! Don't run out of cocoa butter.
That's some weak ass trolling, especially for a hasbara gadfly of middling intellect such as yo' sef.
Actually, I laffed.
"Wurmser would be the founding participant of the unnamed, secret intelligence unit at the Pentagon, set up in Feith's office, which would be the nucleus of the Defense Department's Iraq disinformation campaign that was established within weeks of the attacks in New York and Washington. While the CIA and other intelligence agencies concentrated on Osama bin Laden's Al Qaeda as the culprit in the 9/11 attacks, Wolfowitz and Feith obsessively focused on Iraq. It was a theory that was discredited, even ridiculed, among intelligence professionals. Daniel Benjamin, co-author of The Age of Sacred Terror, was director of counterterrorism at the National Security Council in the late 1990s. "In 1998, we went through every piece of intelligence we could find to see if there was a link between Al Qaeda and Iraq," he says. "We came to the conclusion that our intelligence agencies had it right: There was no noteworthy relationship between Al Qaeda and Iraq. I know that for a fact." Indeed, that was the consensus among virtually all anti-terrorism specialists.
In short, Wurmser, backed by Feith and Rhode, set out to prove what didn't exist."
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2004/01/lie-factory
_______________________
"These two forces — the crypto-Zionists infiltrated in the government and the pro-Israel lobby — sometimes act in criminal conspiracy, as illustrated by the charge against Larry Franklin in 2005, who, as a member of the Office of Special Plans working under Douglas Feith, passed classified defense documents to two AIPAC officials, Steven Rosen and Keith Weissman, who in turn transmitted them to a senior official in Israel. Franklin was sentenced to thirteen years in prison (later reduced to ten years of house-arrest), while Rosen and Weissman were acquitted. Most neoconservatives are active members of the second most powerful lobby pro-Israel, the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA), of which Dick Cheney and Ahmed Chalibi are also members, among others responsible for instigating the Iraq invasion. JINSA was founded in 1976 by American army officers, intellectuals, and politicians, with one of its stated aims “to inform the American defense and foreign affairs community about the important role Israel can and does play in bolstering democratic interests in the Mediterranean and the Middle East”. Colin Powell, according to his biographer Karen DeYoung, privately rallied against this “separate little government” composed of “Wolfowitz, Libby, Feith, and Feith’s ‘Gestapo Office’”, which he also called “the JINSA crowd”.
In 2011, Powell’s former Chief of Staff Lawrence Wilkerson openly denounced the duplicity of neoconservatives such as David Wurmser and Douglas Feith, whom he considered like “card-carrying members of the Likud party. […] I often wondered if their primary allegiance was to their own country or to Israel. That was the thing that troubled me, because there was so much that they said and did that looked like it was more reflective of Israel’s interest than our own”. In fact, a significant number of neoconservatives are Israeli citizens, have family in Israel or have resided there themselves. Some are openly close to Likud, the nationalist party in power in Israel, and several have even been official advisors to Netanyahu; many are regularly praised for their work on behalf of Israel by the Israeli press. Paul Wolfowitz, for example, was nominated “Man of the Year” by the pro-Likud Jerusalem Post in 2003, and « the most hawkishly pro-Israel voice in the Administration » by the American Jewish daily newspaper The Forward.
The duplicity of the neoconservatives is brought to light by a document revealed in 2008 by authors such as James Petras and Stephen Sniegoski (see bibliography); it is a 1996 report by the Israeli think tank Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies, entitled “A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm”, sent to the new Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu. The team responsible for the report was led by Richard Perle, and included Douglas Feith, David Wurmser and his wife Meyrav Wurmser. Perle personally gave the report to Netanyahu on July 8th, 1996. The same year, the authors signed the founding manifesto of PNAC in the U.S., and four years later, they would be positioned in key posts of the U.S. military and U.S. foreign policy. As its title suggests, the report Clean Break invites Netanyahu to break with the Oslo Accords of 1993, which committed Israel to the return of the territories it occupied since 1967 and to retract illegal settlements. The new Prime minister should instead “engage every possible energy on rebuilding Zionism” and reaffirm Israel’s right over the West Bank and the Gaza Strip: “Our claim to the land — to which we have clung for hope for 2,000 years — is legitimate and noble. […] Only the unconditional acceptance by Arabs of our rights, especially in their territorial dimension, ‘peace for peace,’ is a solid basis for the future”. The authors of Clean Break therefore encourage Netanyahu to adopt a politics of territorial annexation, not only contrary to the official position of the United States and the United Nations, but also contrary to public commitments made by Israel. Even though he signed the “roadmap” intended to lead to an independent Palestinian State in September 1999, and maintained his position at the Camp David summit in July 2000, Netanyahu followed the advice of Clean Break and secretly worked to sabotage the process. During a private interview filmed without his knowledge in 2001, he bragged how he undercut the peace process: “I’m going to interpret the accords in such a way that would allow me to put an end to this galloping forward to the ’67 borders”. He also said: “I know what America is. America is a thing you can move very easily, move it in the right direction. They won’t get in our way."
... ...
http://www.voltairenet.org/article178638.html
point is, the same motherless ziopathic fucks were responsible...
https://archive.org/details/MastersOfDeception
To clear up any confusion among those that equate Zionism with Judaism, here is the description from the Jewish perspective:
http://www.nkusa.org/AboutUs/Zionism/judaism_v_zionism.cfm
JUDAISM VERSUS ZIONISM
Judaism believes in One G-d who revealed the Torah. It affirms Divine Providence and, accordingly, views Jewish exile as a punishment for sin. Redemption may be achieved solely through prayer and penance. Judaism calls upon all Jews to obey the Torah in its entirety including the commandment to be patriotic citizens.
Zionism rejects the Creator, His Revelation and reward and punishment. Among its fruits are the persecution of the Palestinian people and the spiritual and physical endangering of the Jewish people. It encourages treasonous, dual loyalty among unsuspecting Jews throughout the world. At its root Zionism sees reality as barren and desacralized. It is the antithesis of Torah Judaism.
There is a vile lie, which stalks the Jewish people across the globe. It is a lie so heinous, so far from the truth, that it can only gain popularity due to the complicity of powerful forces in the "mainstream" media and educational establishment.
It is a lie which has brought many innocent people untold suffering and if unchecked has the potential to create extraordinary tragedy in the future.
It is the lie that declares that Judaism and Zionism are identical.
Nothing could be further from the truth.
Judaism is the belief in revelation at Sinai. It is the belief that exile is a punishment for Jewish sins.
Zionism has for over a century denied Sinaitic revelation. It believes that Jewish exile can be ended by military aggression.
Zionism has spent the past century strategically dispossessing the Palestinian people. It has ignored their just claims and subjected them to persecution, torture and death.
Torah Jews the world over are shocked and pained at this short-lived dogma of irreligiosity and cruelty. Thousands of Torah scholars and saints have condemned this movement from its inception. They knew that the pre-existing good relationship between Jews and Muslims in the Holy Land was bound to suffer as Zionism advanced.
The so-called "State of Israel" stands rejected on religious grounds by the Torah. Its monstrous insensitivity to the laws of basic decency and fairness appall all men be they Jewish or not.
We of Neturei Karta have been in the forefront of the battle against Zionism for over a century.
Our presence here is to refute the base lie that the evil, which is Zionism, in some way represents the Jewish people.
The reverse is true.
We are saddened day in and day at the terrible toll of death emanating from the Holy Land. Not one of them would have occurred if Zionism had not unleashed its evil energies upon the world.
As Jews we are called upon to live in peace and harmony with all men. We are exhorted to be law abiding and patriotic citizens in all lands.
We condemn the current Zionist atrocities in the Holy Land. We yearn for peace based upon mutual respect. We are convinced that this proposed mutual respect is doomed to fail as long as the Israeli state exists. We welcome its abolition in a peaceful manner.
May we be worthy of true redemption when all men will join in brotherhood in His worship.
‘You are a holy people unto the LORD thy God and He has chosen you above all others upon the face of the earth…Therefore when the LORD your God brings you into the land you are to possess and casts out the many peoples living there, you shall slaughter them all and utterly destroy them…You shall make no agreements with them nor show them any mercy. You shall destroy their altars, break down their images, cut down their groves and burn their graven images
with fire…
–Book of Deuteronomy, chapter 14
That's the Torah, not Talmud. The Torah is replete with passages supporting xenophobia, genocide, hatred of non-Jews, different ethical practices as for Jews and non-Jews, and so on.
I do, really, appreciate what you're trying to accomplish with your distinction. And no, few people, least of all me, believe in any kind of *inherent* badness of any group of people.
We're talking *ideology* - hence a Muslim who takes the violent exhortations of the Koran literally will be an evil fuck...
but so will an orthodox Jew or Jewish ultra-nationalist who believes they have a right to live where they please, but an exclusive right to a certain patch of land based on remote ancestors who never lived there alone, to whom they may not even be closely related, etc etc.
the truth is, inherent to Judaism, apologetics about the metaphysics of "chosen-ness" aside {I've read many - they are horseshit} is supremacism and dual ethical standards.
Doesnt mean most Jews believe it. Most Catholics dont really believe only catholics go to heaven. etc.
But your distinction, while emanating from a good, humanistic place, is simply inaccurate.
The Torah itself contains the seeds of Zionism, and all in all, given how BIG and long and complex the Talmud itself is, ironically, its more unfair to pull out a few racist quotes from some random 5th century guy. The racism and supremacism of the Torah is much more part of the fabric, as are the myths of the exodus, solomons temple, etc.
please read:
http://www.jesusneverexisted.com/fabrication.html
http://www.jesusneverexisted.com/chosen-people.html
But, but, butt..... We are told that the Holy Koran tells Muslims that they should exterminate all non-Muslims, and that Muslims are therefore dangerous and Muslims are all potential terrorists.
Now you quote from the Torah, referring to Deuteronomy chapter 14.
I consulted my Bible, the King James version, and checked it against the New King James version. In the King James Version, "The Fifth Book of Moses, called Deuteronomy", begins:
"These be the words which Moses spake unto all Israel..."
Chapter 7 contains the statements you quoted: "When the Lord they God shall bring you into the land whither thou goest to possess it, and hath cast out many nations before thee....And when the Lord thy God shall deliver them before thee; thou shalt smite them , and utterly destroy them; thous shalt make no covenant with them, nor shew mercy to them....ye shall destroy their altars, and break down their images, and cut down their groves, and burn their graven images with fire. For thou art an holy people unto the Lord thy God: the Lord thy God hath chosen thee to be a special people unto himself, above all people that are upon the face of the earth...."
As Jesus said, Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.
SO lets get Feith and hang him by the fucking neck until dead
Him and Cheney are lready dead, we're just waiting for their herarts to stop
Blown Away by the Tsarnaev Show Trial Exhibits:
http://winteractionables.com/?p=20027
i agree there was some fuckery, and that the brothers were likely patsies of some kind - but at least some [most...maybe all?] of those injuries were very real.
Or - you think that doctors and nurses and cops and emts and dozens of immediate bystanders are all in on it - from Mass General to Beth Israel. All the local news stories and shows, from channel 5 to Chronicle - in on it too, etc. etc.
Anyone telling you there were no dead kids at sandy hook never bothered to research the matter - they are either the sort of paranoid who gives CTs a bad name, or lying to you.
ditto this one.
Real injuries.
For sure.
that doesnt mean the official story is what happened.
it does mean that someone is poisoning the well of alternate theories, or is so used to doubting everything th enews says, they will actually believe that hundreds of people - including top doctors and nurses - all faked treating injuries....
and that an entire town, police, doctors, et faked 20+ dead kids.
I mean - what's more likely?
Penn and Teller could convince people they had magic powers if they wanted to - that doesnt mean it would ever be reasonable to ascribe magic to some trick versus something much more likely.
Take the time to actually look at the details, Lack of Shrapnel at Boston Marathon False Flag: http://winteractionables.com/?p=20069
Of course, people died. That's the plan. They just want to plant the blame on pre-approved enemies. Kennedy refused to go along and who got the blame?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods
When people doubt the official line, the MSM and others immediately call them 'deniers', as in denying anything happened. Basically calling them crazy so as to have them committed to the 'fringe'. Don't believe Oswald did it? Crazy! Fake moon landings? Crazy! 9/11 staged? Crazy! Climate Change Denier, etc. The Soviets used the 'crazy' line to lock people up. B. Hussein was trying the same thing by trying to expand 'treatment' for mental illness after Sandy Hoax. Everyone thought it was a simple 'gun grab' at the time.
When you mentioned Beth Israel you lost me. Why would any Zio outfit have any credibility whatsoever?
My dad noted, and had a good laugh about, that unlike other "trials," like the Casey Anthony and Zimmerman ones, the complicit-media barely carried the Boston Smoke Bomb Trial.
"Nothing to see or think about here."
The banksters need to repay us.
"Damn it! How did he get out of the boat? If we can get Ruby into the police garage, you could have killed this patsy in the boat. My god, when you want a fall guy killed right..."
In the USSR they were called Show trials
When similar things happened in USSR they were called Show Trials
When they happen in the USSA they are called justice.
FIFY
Did Ed Royce hide this? I refreshed the page a few times and it's not on the header and I got here but clicking a new comment by Will.
here's another good one for todaythe more you lokk the more you see everything is fake
Malaysia crash shares anniversary with TWA Flight 800http://www.usatoday.com/story/travel/news/2014/07/17/malaysia-flight-17-...
How strange, we have mention of missing MH370 flight and 800 (blown up by a missile-like object according to radar photographs) and Jack Ruby.
Now how could these possibly be connected?
Well, aboard MH370 were 20 employees of Freescale Semiconductor: majority owner Blackstone Group, minority owner Carlyle Group.
Carlyle Group also, until recently, owned ARINC, whose systems are crucial to Boeing 777's fly-by-wire operation, as well as found in Inmarsat satellites, various other avionics and aviation communication systems (earth ground station and VSATs, as well). Also, before Carlyle dumped them, it moved their DoD division to their other property, Booz Allen Hamilton.
Who was the Carlyle Group founded by?
Frank Carlucci, who was with the CIA when President Kennedy was assassinated, and David Rubenstein, nephew of Jacob Rubenstein.
Jacob would later change his name to Jack Ruby.
My oh my, what a small world after all!
Conspiracy theorist!
Yes, he's NUTS ... like THESE WHACKOS!
Prepare to be thrashed by your troll entourage...they just cancelled lunch hour at Ft Meade
Troll swarm in 3-2-1 ... P.S. My apologies that the troll army has to miss lunch today. At least it's Friday, so all y'all can have a good meal tonight.
.
It's all part of that fine J. Edger Hoover tradition of witch hunts and public lynchings because it's much easier than admitting you don't know....
Flawed forensics and fudged science? C'mon, that never happens on TV.
Besides, it's not like this sort of thing happens on a regular basis, right?
http://rt.com/usa/176744-fbi-forensic-lab-review/
.
.
Yes, sir ...
Good man!
Idiot sheeple think crime investigations are super professional and effective. Why? Because on TV they always solve the case in exactly 42 minutes. CSI and everything else on TV is a laugh.
Dot gov never catches the bad guy unless he trips and breaks his leg while leaving the bank. Even then, their poor work is easily torn apart by any decent lawyer.
like 911, many things raise tremendous suspicion: the type of anthrax, who received it, when they received, how it was investigated, etc, etc
GW - Here's something interesting. All my ZH comments, prior to 2 days ago, April 16 have been deleted!!
It seems on this thread
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-04-14/1000-mile-stretch-pacific-ocean...
All references to GeoEngineering were deleted, except for a comment added later by implied violins noting that all comments referencing GeoEngineering were deleted. What kind of evil, manipulating, criminal master minds have taken over ZH? Why is ZH doing this? And doing it without any attempt at explaining why is especially cowardly and again ... evil. Is this a topic worthy of your investigative skills? I sure hope so. I'll try to go open an account on your blog and await developments ... if any. Who new the world was so totally compromised? Wow! Speachless.
How long before this comment is deleted? Welcome to the new NWO. GOOD LUCK ALL.
Save anything you find of value locally at the time you first see it. ….. Multiple copies on discreet drives if possible.
It is my humble opinion that a free and open information exchange on the WWW is living on borrowed time.
~ DC
Personally, I'm blaming it all on AGW ;-)
The cows strike back.