This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
Former U.S. Government Official: U.S. Is ALREADY at War with China and Russia
Top economic and political experts say we're drifting towards World War 3. And see this.
We noted in March that we're already at war with Russia. Many experts agree ...
Former White House official Dr. Philippa Malmgren - former presidential adviser and member of the U.S. President's Working Group on Financial Markets - said last December that the United States is already at war with China and Russia:
I was recently at a meeting with a lot of very senior people from the defense community, and their view is that we are already in a nose-to-nose confrontation (war) with China and Russia. But these (wars) are being conducted through cyberspace rather than through traditional conventional weapons.
An advisor to the US government - Scott Borg, CEO of US Cyber Consequences Unit - says that the United States has already started launching widespread hostile cyber warfare against Russia, China and Iran.
Indeed, the U.S. has admitted that it deployed cyber-warfare against Iran's nuclear power plant.
Paul Craig Roberts – former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury under President Reagan, former editor of the Wall Street Journal, listed by Who’s Who in America as one of the 1,000 most influential political thinkers in the world – says that U.S. war against Russia has already begun.
Mark Galeotti - a Full Professor of Global Affairs at the Center for Global Affairs at New York University, and a prominent expert on modern Russia - says "the West and Russia are already at war".
Ron Paul says that sanctions are an act of war ... and we've had sanctions on Russia and Iran for some time now. And see this.
And the U.S. is threatening military confrontation in the South China Sea. China is taking the threat seriously.
Remember, Russia and the U.S. each have enough nuclear weapons to wipe each other out ... and American, British, Polish and Russian Experts warn that continued fighting in Ukraine could lead to nuclear war.
The Pentagon reports that China now had ballistic missiles which can hit nearly the entirety of the U.S. with nuclear warheads.
Russia and China are in a military alliance, and are conducting joint military exercises.
China has warned the U.S. to stop its Ukranian proxy war against Russia.
China and Russia have both said that an attack on Iran - or Syria - will be considered an act of war against the Bear and the Dragon. We're already in Syria trying to overthrow Assad, and we've been supporting terrorists in Iran for many years.
On the other side of the coin, a former high-level Commander in the German Army warns:
NATO is formed out of 28 states, if just one of them gets involved into a conflict with Russia, the contract obliges all of them to assist. And out of a sudden we get a third world war. The only way to prevent it is if the people rise and say: Russia had to mourn more than enough victims in WWII, do you really want to start a war again?
What could possibly go wrong?
- advertisements -


Thinking is obviously not your strong suit.
You have a very strong case for a return of any money invested on an education.
Your nom de plume and larger than life photo tells me every thing about your character. SLOPPY JOE would appear more appropriate.
You're most likely driving one of those mobility scooters and hence your jaundiced outlook.
REALITY Bah!
You must looove Putin then.
Fuck You Hillary.
The Oscar winning performance in the War Room Oscama Bin Lying Take Out or Take One, Roll Camera Action with Hildebeest hand over mouth.
Bet she went home with a hard-on and when BillyBob said i got a headache she pulled out the 3 way dildo and offed herself, rubber outfit, mouth, anus and hard lips.
Fell down the stairs next day probably still tripping.
BTW, the photo of the boyz and hitlery in the war room supposedly watching the op to kill Bin Laden: please notice that no one has their computers on ... in other words, it's a staged b.s. photo
(credit: Michael Rivero)
umm...it's the gov't they probably all have screen protectors to prevent anyone trying to see what's on their monitors, or more likely, their monitors have timed out as is the case with even my work computer. not only that they're all looking at the screen. so your assessment is likely incorrect.
Why is a little boy sitting next to the General if this is a war room?
It's not a war room, it's a whore room.
you said boy
Makes me wanna reach for my flamethrower.
Tell me it's real GW cause i was going to call Hitlery's little cousin and fellow poisoned dwarf brit packman Wullie Hague and ask him if we could do a full size waxwork of this photo for the Churchill War Rooms or at least Madam Tussauds in London , Blighty.
Most ludicrous laugh was Angelina Jolie-sPitt sauntering around Africa hand in hand with William Warmonger Hague on a Crusade for Women's Rights. Can't beat that Hubris. Even WB would cry at that.
According to Paul Roberts the US is trying to get Europe to fight Russia, just Russia doesn't want to expand. That's why they haven't take Ukraine, expanded their interests, published propoganda or etc. In fact the neocon media in the US lies way worse than pravda. just fuck washington, hopefully the world won't give up their kilts for Russia. Fuck shushama. And I don't even want to talk about what's in place, maybe it'll get bad enough that they become the targets. Maybe. The key is Roberts is just as scared as anybody, in fact he doesn't know what's going to happen.
as for the USA wanting to make EU fight Russia - that wont ever happen. Germany, Italy, France and others will definitely not fight Russia. That is in the realm of impossible, sorry Washington. And Novorussians are quite able to defend themselves. Perhaps that is why Kerry went to Moscow:-) So they can now concentrate more on the Middle East, where their plans are having more success - I mean plans of destroying the individual countries and supporting wahhabi terrorists, who are very eager to fight almost anyone.
Sadly, I think that is wishful thinking. I suspect the average Ukrainian soldier didn't particularly want to face Novorossia.
Its important to not underestimate the ability of a psychopathic elite to drag the rest of a country into an unwanted war, particularly when the psychopathic elite in question have defacto control over the country's media, military, economic and political institutions.
"the US is trying to get Europe to fight Russia...". well, Washington is pushing, hard. Nothing we aren't used to
though I have to say Russia is pushing hard, too. in both cases, powerful industrial interests are keen on finding reasons for more... military spending
the world has become too small for the kind of open, massive military operations that make Dr. Krugman salivate. M.A.D. still applies, only more
but while punching hard in the face isn't feasible anymore, scratching and spitting is, and so we have cyberwars, proxy-wars and assorted pushing, all on the tune of lots of propaganda
Europe and Russia still want to have trade, particularly NatGas and oil. the US and China are still joined to the hip, industrially. just look where iPhones are produced
meanwhile, Russians bank in Europe and Chinese bank in the US, and send their princelings to US Universities. where is the daughter of Xi? in America, of course, where else
"neocon media in the US lies way worse than pravda" -> well, it has to sell, and it has little compulsion in using the truth
but the "neocon" media in the US... isn't it a subset of the conservative media in the US? the bunch engaged in a cultural war with the "progressives" of the coastal regions?
collectively, just by judging on the myths they like to use about for example Europe, they too are more fond of truthiness then truth. and this applies to the whole English-speaking conservative media
just look how conservative political leaders on the continent of Europe are portrayed, from Russia's Putin to Italy's Berlusconi to France's Sarkozy to Germany's Merkel to Spain's Rajoy or Luxembourg's (and now the EU's) Juncker, just to name a few that might be a bit more known
if you consume a purely English-speaking conservative media diet, you'd get the impression they all have an IQ of sub-zero, eat children for breakfast and are all socialists, to boot
Conflating conservatives and neocons is a gross misunderstanding of both.
Neocons are frequently cultural Marxists, and many were previously full blown Marxists.
In any event, they are all Zionists and always have been, even when Marxists - their agenda is the advancement of Greater Israel, not the advancement of "freedom", "liberty" (quaint terms meant to pacify restless debt-slaves) or the country known as the "United States".
You misunderstand. Neonservatism is proxy zionism. That there are gentiles who share their militarism should not mislead you into thinking that the heavy prominence of jews (right wing jews..so perhaps 1/3 of 2.2% of the gen pop) in the movement, e.g. in advocacy for the Iraq war, was coincidental.
nevertheless, they are, in the media landscape and social sense, conservatives. hence the "neo-con" label, right?
Call them what you want but neo-con politics are progressive in nature.
There is not a constitutional conservative in sight. Anywhere.
Especially in the media. And doubly especially in Europe. Conservatives in Europe? That is quite a joke. All progressive, all big government/banker tyranny, all the time.
I get a kick out of progressives pointing fingers and acting like it is not progressives that own all the really scummy criminal shit going on in the world today.
The progressive stupid, it burns.
Grimaldus
Whenever I tell people that we're Already "at War" they look at me as if I'm nuts.
I had dinner last fall with a former grad student of mine, and asked him if he was at all concerned about a potential WWIII. He said he was not. I met him again early this year and asked the same question. He shrugged it off and said we were already at war. His nonchalance was striking. Very troublesome.
All China & Russia have to do is start dumping US paper, together.
Let's hope they take things seriously enough to start on that soon. Those of us who are awake in the 'west', are just as sick as they are of the USian war crim zios, their racketeering banks, and the vassals in their puppet 'governments' in other countries.
Come on, China, you can do it. Cut off the Anglo-Zionist credit card. Make them start paying for their own costs of genocide.
Well said!
Fine. Let them. We get our debt back for pennies on the dollar, we win.
One might think they will time the dump to coincide with QE4 for maximum impact.
keep beating the drum. it draws the roaches to you
Cyber warfare?
Tip for Russia, China, and everyone else:
Cut the internet cables and build isolated all new networks...
in progress
And isolate themselves from the global community?
Oh well. Another chapter in the "Amazing (Great) War" saga. Probably not be as exciting as the last two, since the armies are smaller, and no country except the US really has the ability to project any sort of force (and even that is severely degraded by the last decade and a half of grinding low-intensity conflict).
Really, it's just more theatre of war.
My recommendation is: don't go to any open casting calls. It may be an act, but the bullets are real.
yeah. So what are all these pentagon "cyberwarriors" gonna do when the transpacific and transatlantic fibercable
is all disconnected from the rest of the world tired of
American shit?
All they'll have left is Central/South America with which to entertain themselves. That's never been much fun for them
us will go from awe struck to aw fuck .
Listen Donut, the USSofA and the Europissons are ONLY effective when having the ability to administer No Fly Zones.
This won't occur with China, Russia or Iran.
Yep. That's what I said. And my name's not Donut. I like donuts though.
I guess nuance is still escaping many here.
Let's re-translate my post:
WWIII is not going to be anything different from the previous Sociopathically-induced genocides. Everyone makes it sound like it will somehow be "bigger" or "the end."
This is not 1941. Countries do not have large standing armies. China and Russia still do not have the ability to put boots on the ground outside their immediate sphere of influence. The US still has this ability, albeit severely degraded by 15 years of foreign adventures.
Any shooting war that happens will be proxies, and most likely take the form of drones fighting drones.
The US had no large standing army prior to WW1 or WW2. What you start with has little to do with you end up with or the size of the war. It can get big and ugly very fast.
There is a big difference now with complex weapons systems. You can never manufacture F22s like they did B17s during the last world war. For the most part, North America escaped bombing in WW2. That will not be the case in a future war even if it does not go nuclear.
ICBMs are accrate enough that they do not require nuclear warheads except for the most hardened of facilities.
Attrition of high value weapons will not be sustainable by manufacturers. To make matters worse, those manufacturers will come under attack. Weapons lost through attrition will be replaced by increasingly obsolete equipment that had been previously decomed or stored.
As the "war" gets bigger, the weapon systems will be less advanced. It won't be any less bloody though.
One of many gov. "jobs" programs....
"Over There! Over There!"
Donut is a term of affection, like sweety.
The USSofA could only at best DRAW in a fight against Russia and that's with their option of last resort, Nuclear.
Economically Bankrupt but STILL with +200 military bases around the Globe these Parasitic Neocons/ BankCorp are watching the dying embers of $$$$$$$$$$ Hegemony piss by in the wind and thus are capable of anything ( it WAS my BALL and if WE'RE NOT CAPTAIN no one is Playing ).
China already owns vast swathes of Land/ Enterprises in the USSofA and Europe and it seems they will in the next 10/20 years own 50% of the World's wealth.
If you want to see Chinese ' boots on the ground ' go to Angola. In less than 10 years you might think you were in China on arrival at the airport.