This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

WalMart Suppliers Brace For The Coming Storm: "Now We Know Why They Have Been Pushing So Hard"

Tyler Durden's picture




 

When Wal-Mart moved to hike wages for its lowest paid employees earlier this year, we were quick to note that the fallout would end up rippling through the supply chain. Here’s what we said in April: 

The irony is that while WMT (or MCD or GAP or Target) boosts the living standards of its employees by the smallest of fractions, it cripples the cost and wage structure of the entire ecosystem of vendors that feed into it, and what takes place is a veritable avalanche effect where a few cent increase for the lowest paid megacorp employees results in a tidal wave of layoffs for said megacorp's vendors.

Subsequently, the retailer embarked on a series of efforts to extract every last penny of savings from suppliers including i) an effort to compel vendors to forgo marketing expenditures, ii) adding storage fees and manipulating payment schedules, and iii) demanding that suppliers pass along any savings from China’s yuan devaluation. 

As we’ve been at pains to explain, this was absolutely inevitable.

When “everyday low prices” is the corporate religion, you can’t pass along rising labor costs to consumers. Add it the fact that WalMart’s customers largely belong to the same tax bracket as the company’s meagerly compensated hourly employees and raising prices simply is not an option. 

That means either suppliers suffer, hours are cut, people get laid off, or all of the above. 

At Wal-Mart, it’s been all of the above, as workers at some stores report reductions in hours and the Bentonville office looks to cut hundreds of management level positions.

Meanwhile, some of the retailer’s higher paid workers have become disgruntled at the company’s failure to preserve the wage hierarchy (i.e. when you summarily hike wages for one group of employees and not others, you have distorted the pay ladder).

Now, after last week’s dramatic guidance cut and subsequent stock price plunge, suppliers are bracing for the worst. Here’s Reuters:

Suppliers of everything from groceries to sports equipment are already being squeezed for price cuts and cost sharing by Wal-Mart Stores. Now they are bracing for the pressure to ratchet up even more after a shock earnings warning from the retailer last week.

 

The discount store behemoth has always had a reputation for demanding lower prices from vendors but Reuters has learned from interviews with suppliers and consultants, as well as reviewing some contracts, that even by its standards Wal-Mart has been turning up the heat on them this year.

 

"The ground is shaking here," said Cameron Smith, head of Cameron Smith & Associates, a major recruiting firm for suppliers located close to Wal-Mart's headquarters in Bentonville, Arkansas. "Suppliers are going to have to help Wal-Mart get back on track."

 

For the vendors, dealing with Wal-Mart has always been tough because of its size – despite recent troubles it still generates more than $340 billion of annual sales in the U.S. That accounts for more than 10 percent of the American retail market, excluding auto and restaurant sales, and the company increasingly sells a lot overseas too. To risk having brands kicked off Wal-Mart’s shelves because of a dispute over pricing can badly hurt a supplier.

 

On Wednesday, Wal-Mart stunned Wall Street by forecasting that its earnings would decline by as much as 12 percent in its next fiscal year to January 2017 as it struggles to offset rising costs from increases in the wages of its hourly-paid staff, improvements in its stores, and investments to grow online sales. This at a time when it faces relentless price competition from Amazon.com Inc dollar stores and regional supermarket chains. Keeping the prices it pays suppliers as low as it can is essential if it is to start to claw back some of this cost hit to its margins.

Speaking of Amazon, recall the following which we posted in the aftermath of the guidance cut:

Back to Reuters:

The squeeze on suppliers was clear to those selling to Wal-Mart’s Sam’s Club warehouse clubs around April this year. Sam’s Club’s buyers summoned major vendors to meetings and told them a "cost gap analysis" showed they should be delivering at a lower price, and demanded millions of dollars in discounts on future purchases, according to emails reviewed by Reuters and interviews with suppliers and consultants involved in the talks.


Unlike in prior talks, which featured give and take, vendors were told they could not ask questions at the meetings, with queries to be handled later via email, according to suppliers and consultants involved in or briefed on the meetings.

Yes, no questions allowed, and as we've pointed out before, WalMart can sadly get away with this type of approach to dealing with vendors because after all, if you're a supplier, you're not going to cut your nose off to spite your face by rebelling against your largest revenue stream. Or, as Leon Nicholas, a senior vice president at Kantar Retail, which advises Wal-Mart suppliers put it last month, "you can push and push, but at the end of the day you know where the power lies."

And after last week's carnage, the supply chain is finally beginning to understand why WalMart has become even stingier than normal.

Wednesday's announcement sent ripples through the supplier community in the Bentonville area, where more than 1,000 have offices to stay close to Wal-Mart. 

 

"Now we know why they have been pushing so hard," said an executive at a major consumer goods supplier to both Walmart and Sam's Club, adding that his team was shocked by the projected decline in profits. "Maybe they were banking on more suppliers rolling over on the terms." 

 

Wal-Mart's success in boosting profits could hinge in large part on the willingness of suppliers to sign on to its new terms and agree to its price demands. Despite signs of resistance, one consumer goods supplier reckons most will eventually give in to Wal-Mart’s market power, though not without a fight. 

 

He pushed back after the retailer asked him for new terms that cut 2 percent off his annual sales. They settled on 1 percent, but he fears further demands down the road.

 

 

“I just worry that this is a slippery slope of them going in this direction," he said.

A slippery slope indeed, much like the slippery downward slope the company's earnings seem to be on, and between the above mentioned pressure from online retailers and fierce competition from no frills dollar stores, one is left to wonder if perhaps WalMart's move to hike wages may have set the legendary discounter on a path to becoming the next K-Mart.


 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Mon, 10/19/2015 - 20:13 | 6687521 Casey Jones
Casey Jones's picture

I suspect you're right but I pray to every fucking God imaginable that there's another way.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 14:48 | 6686050 all-priced-in
all-priced-in's picture

I have three WM stores that are 2-3 miles from my home - they are all different.

 

A WM store will take on the personality of the surrounding neighborhood.

 

Even the products they carry are different -  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tue, 10/20/2015 - 14:10 | 6690299 ZeroPoint
ZeroPoint's picture

Millions died from starvation and mal-nutrition during the Great Depression. And that was a time when most people lived in rural areas where they could grow crops, raise animals, and trade services. This time will very different.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:43 | 6684865 Big Beta Bill
Big Beta Bill's picture

If you are a vendor who does not want to sell to Walmart, then don't.  This is a free market.  The retail industry is one of the freest industries we have.   

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 11:45 | 6685140 Twaddlefree
Twaddlefree's picture

Exactly! The vendors are the ones with the Chinese baubles that they can't sell anywhere else where there might be competition. To get in with WM is to assure sales. Yet, WM will be castigated, now, for being "mean" to the vendors...poor things. WM conceded to appease the Socialists and did the wage increases that were, supposedly, the answer to everything, right? Now, we have trickle down depression on its way.

Tue, 10/20/2015 - 12:23 | 6689812 BarkingCat
BarkingCat's picture

Bullshit!!

Walmart is know to push their vendors to outsource to China. There are enough of them one record making a claim that they were told to move production to China because it can shave a nickel off the cost.

Fuck China-Mart from here until eternity and sideways with a leper's dick. I hope they go belly up.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 12:01 | 6685210 uhb
uhb's picture

precisely my thoughts... stop whining and roll over OR stop whining and tell Walmart to shove it up their ...

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 12:50 | 6685461 SFopolis
SFopolis's picture

Agreed.  Walmart is cutthroat.  If anyone thinks that they won't take the opportunity of a good disaster they are crazy. How much did this cut into the familie's profits?  2%, 10%, 20%?   Fuck them. This is exactly what is wrong with the world... What a bunch of sorry fucks defending the likes of Walmart.  As if it is some sort of eithos worth defending.  For fuck's sake, it's Walmart.  They own most of the country's retail and they are resonsible for thier own shit. Fuck.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 14:03 | 6685831 wizteknet
wizteknet's picture

miss kmart, last time I saw my cheerleader girl I was in love with at, oh bummer

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 15:00 | 6686090 all-priced-in
all-priced-in's picture

I just got back from a 1,500 mile road trip from Texas to Missouri - I saw 3 K-Marts.  It has been 10 years since I saw a K-Mart that was still in business.

 

We needed some miscellaneous crap - I wanted to stop at K-Mart but my wife insisted on Walmart -

 

Since we had been driving for 10 hours we were looking a little ragged - and my wife didn't want to have to go fix her hair and put on nice clothes just so she could go into K-Mart.

 

That is the difference - you go to Walmart you don't feel the pressure to have to dress up like you do when you are going shopping at K-Mart or Dollar General. ;-O

 

 

 

 

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 14:19 | 6685907 Noplebian
Noplebian's picture

Low paid jobs are disapearing and the population is increasing, especially from the mass influx of low skilled migrants. With many jobs now being automated and no new 'real jobs' being created to replace them, the future looks bleak for the current population of the west.....this of course is part of the grand plan!

More on the agenda here......

http://beforeitsnews.com/global-unrest/2015/10/the-un-2030-agenda-a-blue...

 

 

Tue, 10/20/2015 - 06:12 | 6688574 hangemhigh77
hangemhigh77's picture

Start hanging politicians, banksters, CEO's and the elite. That will keep us busy for a year or two. Good volunteer work.

Tue, 10/20/2015 - 06:09 | 6688570 hangemhigh77
hangemhigh77's picture

Fuck WalMart, they're a bunch of fucking traitors. The last thing they'll sell before they close their doors will be jelly donuts.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 09:51 | 6684677 VinceFostersGhost
VinceFostersGhost's picture

 

 

If they layoff Bob Dole from the front door.....you know it's serious.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:12 | 6684741 TeamDepends
TeamDepends's picture

Welcome to Walmart, Bob Dole loves you.

Tue, 10/20/2015 - 12:28 | 6689841 BarkingCat
BarkingCat's picture

Bob Dole got Viagra. Bob Dole loves you long time.

 

Bob Dole says, hold Bob Dole's pencil.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 09:53 | 6684682 GOSPLAN HERO
GOSPLAN HERO's picture

World's largest seller of cheap Chinese shit.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:17 | 6684769 rejected
rejected's picture

They all sell the same cheap crap. It's downright disgusting to see Walmarts parking lot full of waddling ameriKans packing their new zero down, 10 year payment plan cars with foreign made shit. Then bitch because they can't find a decent job.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:19 | 6684776 plane jain
plane jain's picture

Largest, yes; lowest priced seller of cheap Chinese shit, no. That would be Dollar Tree. 

My favorite place for pizza pans and cookie sheets, FWIW. For some things thin metal is good, and when they get to rough looking just go get a couple of more.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:51 | 6684905 Mile
Mile's picture

If you don't mind lead in your cooking trays, pot and pans, then go for it.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 11:19 | 6685025 plane jain
plane jain's picture

Pots and pans, no. No liquids involved here and I usually use parchment paper or aluminum foil

I wouldn't buy any toys there either FWIW.

Excellent value for pregnancy tests, not that this tip will have much impact with the ZH crowd.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:22 | 6684790 Bro of the Sorr...
Bro of the Sorrowful Figure's picture

seems like an opportune time for china to devalue a little bit more.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 11:48 | 6685145 Twaddlefree
Twaddlefree's picture

Yep, made possible by hundreds of smaller businesses who make them and sell them to WalMart and profit greatly from them. Perhaps the unionized workers from the factories in America might have settled for $15 an hour if they'd known their livlihoods would be gone forever.

Tue, 10/20/2015 - 12:40 | 6689911 undertow1141
undertow1141's picture

No their handlers keep them too ignorant and elitist to have ever accepted 15/hr. Look at the bakers union at Hostess. They rode it right to the grave, even though 4 other unions were pleading with them to negotiate. It has nothing to do with the value of the work to unions, its about strong arming an employer with threats of strikes.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 11:53 | 6685172 Twaddlefree
Twaddlefree's picture

Big Lots, Ollie's, and other salvage stores are the best for quality goods (still made in China...not everything is "cheap" or even inexpensive that's made in China). Have to hunt out the good deals, do without items you may need but are not yet available, AND you will often find unsold WalMart branded stuff there at less than half the cost (mostly seasonal). Clientele is about the same as WM, so put on your body armor and cam corder for an adventure.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 09:54 | 6684685 yogibear
yogibear's picture

Corporate buybacks are going to hurt for those companies with a lot of debt.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 14:58 | 6686088 wizteknet
wizteknet's picture

word up

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 09:56 | 6684690 Zero-Hegemon
Zero-Hegemon's picture

Just more of the same, it's the Walmart way. Get your suppliers addicted to YOUR orders, so that you become the majority of their business, and then hammer them as hard as you can on lowering their prices. ALWAYS. Go to their food aisles, all of their packages are different sizes and weights than the normal ones found in regular grocery stores. Another way they get you, unique packaging configurations.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 12:00 | 6685207 Twaddlefree
Twaddlefree's picture

Oh, so it's WalMart's fault that its suppliers want to sell products to the largest retailer in the country? 

ALL manufacturers use the different packaging, model numbers, etc. to sell their products. ALL of the retailers negotiate with them to make products just for their stores....Costco, Best Buy, even Amazon has started it.

Ever tried comparing prices by units to find the price that works best for you, instead of bashing WalMart as a fulltime job?

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 14:23 | 6685926 all-priced-in
all-priced-in's picture

The main reason you see different pack sizes - or slight variations in some products -  the same item but a different model number - maybe different color buttons on the TV set --

 

The supplier WANTS the product to be different - the supplier wants a different model number - it is not because WM demands it.

 

If you can't figure out why a supplier would want to sell a different item to WM then you have never had a customer call and yell at you because they just saw an item in WM that is being sold for about what they can buy it for wholesale.

 

 

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 16:26 | 6686523 Zero-Hegemon
Zero-Hegemon's picture

Ever try manufacturing the same product going into 100 different SKUs? Sure, suppliers LOVE that. Especially the part where you get to manage a nearly constant stream of artwork change requests for all the printed components. Makes life grand, you know? The customer that orders the largest batch sizes eventually get precedence over the smaller orders/customers, hence Walmart helps enable their suppliers to rely on their orders, since it's easier changover, change control, batch management, purchasing, etc. Managing a few large orders/few SKUs is much easier than managing many small orders/many SKUs. Once a certain percentage of your volume as a supplier starts going to the same customer, they got you by the short & curlies on pricing. You play ball or you start laying people off.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 09:57 | 6684694 Exalt
Exalt's picture

Wait what? I thought consumer spending was being stimulated? /sarc

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 09:58 | 6684697 Philo Beddoe
Philo Beddoe's picture

Fuck Wal Mart

Sincerely, 

Mom and Pop

 

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:02 | 6684712 VinceFostersGhost
VinceFostersGhost's picture

 

 

Potentially a Catch 22.....cause Mom and Pop shop at Walmart.

 

Just keeping it real.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:14 | 6684749 Philo Beddoe
Philo Beddoe's picture

Pop goes to go buy their daily ration of Alpo each week. On the upside, he gets greeted by mom each visit. Really, it is quite romantic. 

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 12:28 | 6685346 cheech_wizard
cheech_wizard's picture

Alpo was on sale this weekend. 10 cans for $6 at Dillons. 

Did you stock up?

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 12:39 | 6685402 Whoa Dammit
Whoa Dammit's picture

Then their kids Dick and Jane keep the corporate fascism going strong with their 666Ks because they still cling to the belief that someday they will retire. It's a closed loop vicious cycle.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:18 | 6684770 MsCreant
MsCreant's picture

Mom and Pop shop Walmart because they lost their small Mom and Pop shop to Walmart when they were driven out of business.

Walmart gets corporate welfare on many fronts:

  • They had the US govt. build them an airfield for their exclusive use with US Tax payer funds.
  • They lobbied for and got corporate loopholes that allow them to hold money in a trust that is tax free. This gets them 3 billion a year.
  • They do not employ people enough to give them benefits. As a result the employees qualify for food stamps, housing vouchers, and medical care, all on our dime.

Fuck Walmart.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:52 | 6684906 VinceFostersGhost
VinceFostersGhost's picture

 

 

I see nothing factually incorrect about that.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 11:44 | 6685138 Miss Expectations
Miss Expectations's picture

WalMart buyer tells the vendor, "I want a banded pack of these 2 products with a $1.99 retail price."

Vendor says, "We will barely break even at $1.99 retail.  Sorry, no can do."

WalMart, "If you don't give us the $1.99 banded pack, we won't take your 3 product launches slated for 1Q.

***Chaos at vendor headquarters***

Banded packs produced for WalMart at essentially break even.

KMart Buyer places WalMart banded pack infront of vendor.  "We want this, too."  What's the pricing?

Vendor to KMart Buyer:  $1.49.

KMart Buyer:  That's CRAZY.  How in the world can you or WalMart make money with that pricing?  WE can't make money at that price.  No deal.

BUT WAIT, there's more.

Was WalMart billed $1.49 per banded pack?  Yes they were invoiced for $1.49 per banded pack.

Here's the kicker...they never paid the $1.49.  They paid about $1.00.

This, my friends, is how you get new products into WalMart.  This, my friends, is how KMart got screwed.  Were they offered the same deal?  Technically, yes.

 

 

 

 

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 12:15 | 6685275 mc225
mc225's picture

i thought walmart was billed 1.99 for the banded pack. how did the billing go from 1.99 to 1.49? your example says walmart demanded the banded pack for 1.99, then later that they were billed 1.49... so what happened at kmart exactly?

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 12:59 | 6685511 Almost Solvent
Almost Solvent's picture

$1.99 is the retail price stamped on the package (think potato chip bags) that the customer sees, but that is not what the store pays.

 

In this example, the supplier 'sold' it to WMT wholesale for $1.49 each, leaving a .50$ 'margin' on each sale, at least on paper.

 

When others stores went to them with the $1.99 stamped on it, they were quoted the same $1.49 wholesale, which was not enough to cover the store's overhead. The stores would lose money, except WMT.

 

WMT has an assortment of chargebacks and fees that skim off the top, so the paper wholesale price of $1.49 was really $1.00 when all other side deals were taken into account. So, WMT was making .99$ per unit retail instead of .50$. Multiplied by millions of units, that's some real money there. 

Tue, 10/20/2015 - 07:48 | 6688694 Chuck Walla
Chuck Walla's picture

KM got screwed when Eddie Lampert decided he knew all about retail. And then they fell off the already low bar they had set for themselves. Will not miss thee slowest checkouts in the world.

 

Once, I needed some batterys, AA, popped in, found them, went to check out.  3 lines open. One had the checker on the phone calling for manager, some scammer needed help. Next, she disappears to find whatever. Next line needed price check. When she got no reponse, off she went. 3rd line, same story in 10 sec after line 2. 3 lines, no checkers, nothing. Guess how many times I've been back after just leaving in disgust?

 

FORWARD CHEAP CHINA! (and utensils)

 

The last KM here closes after the holiday.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:28 | 6684811 all-priced-in
all-priced-in's picture

Local Ace Hardware went out of business -

 

They were right next door to Home Depot - Lowes and Walmart were across the street.

 

I shopped there sometimes - mostly when I needed nuts and bolts - they had a great selection - any size of nut, bolt, screw, washer in zink, galvanized or stainless steel.

 

Anyway - I go to the going out of business sale -

 

They have stuff marked 70% off - and their prices were still higher than HD, Lowes or WM

 

I wonder why they went out of business? They were always so friendly and helpful.

 

 

 

 

 

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:37 | 6684842 plane jain
plane jain's picture

Price matters, and if they were still that high then yes, they were overpriced.

But price isn't the only factor. 

Loved my local Ace hardware when I was still living in Texas. The perfect place to go when you needed some annoying little something because you could get in and out quickly and it was staffed with old gray haired guys that were experienced and could actually help you get the right whatsit to fix your problem.

Bonus:bulk hardware so you could just buy one washer/screw/bolt instead of having to buy a pack of 12.

Tue, 10/20/2015 - 13:09 | 6685196 all-priced-in
all-priced-in's picture

I also liked the bulk - sand, top soil & mulch they sold.

 

I would buy a pick up load of mulch every spring - drive out to the pile in their back yard  and they would use a front end loader to fill you up - much better quality VS the crap Home Depot sells in bags -

 

Now I buy 24 bags - haul it out to my truck and load it myself -

 

I always end up with at least a full bag of large sticks and rocks -

 

 

The top soil Ace sold was great for flower beds -

 

I bought 10 bags to "top quality" top soil from Home Depot - it was 45% dirt 45% sticks and 10% rocks

 

 

 

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 11:07 | 6684972 Peak Finance
Peak Finance's picture

Sorry, as much as I love Ace, 50 cents for a fucking washer I know was stampped out in china for 0.025 of a cent is fucking insane.

 

Bye bye Ace

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 11:21 | 6685033 plane jain
plane jain's picture

That is an expensive ACE hardware. IIRC prices were more like .08 - .12 per piece.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 15:24 | 6686212 swmnguy
swmnguy's picture

Could be a really big washer.  For a 3/4" bolt or something.  Or big and stainless.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 11:46 | 6685141 11b40
11b40's picture

There is a major cost component when you carry slower turning inventory, so yes, their prices must be higher.

There is also more cost for employing knowledgeable and reliable people who stay with you and become a part of the business.

Typically, the difference in quality and service is what keeps the successful Mon & Pop alive today.  Many are thriving as they have found their niche and figured out how to compete with the big boxes.  Many others have already gone away, while still more are headed for the graveyard.  The small independent retailer has a tough life of long hours, frustrations with the supply chain, lack of attention from suppliers, high costs with little leverage, and evermore rules and regulations to comply with and taxes to pay.  Even if there is no major big box competitor nearby, you live in fear of one showing up and crushing you.

But, that is business, and if you are smart and reasonably well funded to weather storms, there are usually ways to compete for an aggressive merchant.

Tue, 10/20/2015 - 12:41 | 6689915 BarkingCat
BarkingCat's picture

There is still Ace here in Seattle and doing quite well. They do have higher prices and better selection and good staff.

Place has lots of business, but Seattle is a strange place with lots of weird people who have lots of money.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 15:02 | 6686107 wizteknet
wizteknet's picture

Will miss ace hardware...

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:07 | 6684721 ZeroPoint
ZeroPoint's picture

I do miss the good old days of Mom & Pop 5 and dimes, and the department stores at the peak of the 60-70s.

 

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 09:58 | 6684698 E.F. Mutton
E.F. Mutton's picture

I hope this won't adversely affect the availability of the 99 cent, jumbo bags of Cheese Puffs.  Kardashian/NFL night wouldn't be the same without them.  Baaaaaaaa....

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:03 | 6684713 ZeroPoint
ZeroPoint's picture

Have you read the ingredients in those cheese puffs? You might as well eat a snowglobe.

 

 

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 12:15 | 6685277 yellowsub
yellowsub's picture

Considering his entertainment choice, eating that won't cause anymore harm to his/her brain.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 12:59 | 6685509 HopefulCynical
HopefulCynical's picture

I LOLed. +10

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 09:59 | 6684699 fightapathy
fightapathy's picture

Whoops! Looks like the Wal-Mart model of doing business WAS a stinking heap of BS after all...!

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:16 | 6684762 cheech_wizard
cheech_wizard's picture

No, the business model was fine. It was giving into the demands of the progressive hucksters/leeches and raising wages for a job that required nothing more than a warm body to perform that screwed them.

 

 

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:20 | 6684782 MsCreant
MsCreant's picture

The business model is not fine. I posted some details above. They are not making it on their own, they are using corporate welfare to get the job done.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:28 | 6684808 cheech_wizard
cheech_wizard's picture

Then blame the system that permits that to go on, not the entity that makes use of the loophole. And you know I'm right, because, wait for it, ... human nature.

Standard Disclaimer: But if you claim to be what Diogenes was searching for, well, step into the limelight, you'd be the first in a long time.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:35 | 6684831 MsCreant
MsCreant's picture

cheech,

You said the business model was fine. That implies to me that their model was making the money for them, not corporate welfare. Their business model only works if they get government intervention.

Fuck Walmart. Fuck crony capitalism. I hate the playa and the game. 

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:48 | 6684886 chunga
chunga's picture

Also it seems to me that so much of the profit goes towards buying/selling/analyzing the stocks there really isn't any room left to pay the people that work there.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 11:26 | 6685051 cheech_wizard
cheech_wizard's picture

Again, you've missed the point. It did not start out that way, but it certainly evolved into precisely what you state. But the Fuck Walmart meme is getting old. Because after Walmart and McDonalds die, who is NEXT on your fucking list? Think long and hard about that. Really long and hard.

Here's a clue.

Walmart employs an astounding 2.1 million people. In the United States alone, the company employs 1.4 million people. This is a staggering 1% of the U.S.'s 140 million working population.

They can all start up Mom and Pop's, right? 

Standard Disclaimer: If all I had to do to get up arrows here, sure Fuck Walmart, Fuck Crony Capitalism. 

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 12:08 | 6685245 Twaddlefree
Twaddlefree's picture

Well said, thank you.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 15:37 | 6686248 MsCreant
MsCreant's picture

cheech,

Ain't mad at cha'. I do disagree. 

They are employing that number while being propped up by our tax dollars. Let it fail and sort itself out. I have faith that people will re-sort things out when that Potemkin monstrosity goes under. Ditto any corporation playin' this game. They do it on our dime because we let them because they have bought the Halls of Congress.

I am biased. I like local and less centralization for my government. The big corporations are getting our tax dollars so that they can stay in business and keep people employed in an artificial environment that would not exist except that our govt. chose them to survive.  This is not sustainable. It is a bad business model.

Let mother nature rip. I know that means I might lose my job. I'm waiting for it any way. Quality of life is going down everywhere because of these "business models." There is a point where shortsightedness regarding the impact on the larger economy, and the end user, is going to result in the assination of the golden goose laying the eggs.

What is described in this article is mother nature asserting herself on the equation. 

Bad business model.

Tue, 10/20/2015 - 08:01 | 6688722 Chuck Walla
Chuck Walla's picture

Sam Walton's model worked, it devolved with the Ivy Leaguers they hired to run it. As someone on ZH pointed out, there's a difference between businessmen and financiers. The family didn't feel like running it and decided they could hire the "BEST" management out there. Unfortunately, the guys they hired have totally different interests and philosophies from the founder.  And most of them have never really talked to a Wally Shopper and wash their hands ASAP if they happen to stumble across one.

 

Same with Mickey D. The heirs don't see any sense in getting their hands dirty, might as well realize their full expression of self with whatever they do. So, Hah-verd seems to have have good people. Didn't buffy date  some finance wizard at Yale?  They hire these know nothings who have the pals in congress to grease the welfare state(it works for the needs of both), the pals to grease Wall St., run it into the ground and voila. Here we are. 

 

FORWARD SOVIET GLOBALISTS!

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 15:04 | 6686116 wizteknet
wizteknet's picture

go figure

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:00 | 6684703 two hoots
two hoots's picture

The economy is so good that people no longer need the likes of Walmart.   

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:10 | 6684737 lasvegaspersona
lasvegaspersona's picture

I'm waiting for Nordstrums to add a grocery section....and tires...

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:15 | 6684758 Bastiat
Bastiat's picture

Let them shop at Niemann Marcus.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:25 | 6684798 El Viejo
El Viejo's picture

Remember the story on Needless Markup?  People were trying to impress their neighbors by putting trash in Needless Markup bags on the street for garbage pickup.  They wouldn't pick it up because Biohazardous waste was put into red bags.  Don't know if it is true or not, but funny.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:47 | 6684869 WillyGroper
WillyGroper's picture

@Bastiat,

I prefer Niemann MakeUs. ;)

Always custom.

 

Sheesh...they're erecting a new cell tower less than 1 mile from another on WhaleMart property & building a new WMT right by a very upscale neighborhood here.

ManOman are those homeowners pithed.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 15:06 | 6686122 wizteknet
wizteknet's picture

Towers gps, yah think martial law

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:01 | 6684704 Debugas
Debugas's picture

i see no problem here - market supply and demand forces battling here. You either sell for the price the buyer is wiling to buy or go find another buyer or go out of business

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:01 | 6684705 Rubbish
Rubbish's picture

I just raised my prices to remove rubbish from walmart by 25%, why? Because you don't fuck with Rubbish, Rubbish stinks, Rubbish is nasty.

 

Walmart go to hell and back.

 

Gold Bitchez.....I pick up pennies

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:01 | 6684707 Vlad the Inhaler
Vlad the Inhaler's picture

"When “everyday low prices” is the corporate religion, you can’t pass along rising labor costs to consumers. That means either suppliers suffer, hours are cut, people get laid off, or all of the above."

You forgot lower profits and executive compensation LOL.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:09 | 6684734 chunga
chunga's picture

The problems for both walmart and mcdonalds stem from their lowest paid workers making too much money.

I dunno, something just doesn't seem right about this.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:20 | 6684778 Crocodile
Crocodile's picture

Romans 1:28-32 will explain all of it, but one must be able to take what having a useless mind actually looks like in the world we live in. 

 

I can tell you this much; we haven't begin to experience the pain we are going to experience because of divine judgment.  The surreal world we live in is a mere shadow of the real substance, a substance that most cannot see much less comprehend if they did see it...as it is written and as we were forewarned and ignored.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:22 | 6684794 cheech_wizard
cheech_wizard's picture

Let's see go from a minimum wage of $7.25/hr to $15/hr.

So $7.75 more per hour for breathing (err wasting oxygen) or a percentage increase of 106.9%.

You're quite right... everyone's wages need to increase by one or the other, right?

Standard Progressive Disclaimer: If you go by percentage increase, I would then be able to buy a Tesla and pay fucking cash. How is this not great for the economy?

 

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:45 | 6684874 plane jain
plane jain's picture

I don't know where the $15 an hour target came from. But our current minimum pretty much guarantees that people paid that wage qualify for government subsidy.

I did the math a while back and came up with $11.59 as a reasonable target for minimum wage.

Most low wage jobs are not full time, so planning on the average under 30 hours a week a single worker with no dependents would need to make $11.59 an hour in order to not qualify for most government handouts which are generally capped at 150% of the Federal poverty line.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 11:18 | 6685022 cheech_wizard
cheech_wizard's picture

>I don't know where the $15 an hour target came from.

Stop pretending you live under a rock... 


Mon, 10/19/2015 - 11:23 | 6685044 plane jain
plane jain's picture

I know that number has been in the media, just don't know why $15 instead of some other nice round number. If there is some particular significance to 15 then I admit I've missed it.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 11:32 | 6685078 cheech_wizard
cheech_wizard's picture

Then let's play the game of wage inflation with what the Democrats's want...

http://thehill.com/policy/finance/other/241019-dems-bet-on-push-for-12-m...

Is that more reasonable?

Standard Disclaimer: Should not all wages go up by a percentage of what they want to raise minimum wage by? It's only fair, isn't it? After all, it's such hard work to be a burger flipper. 

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 11:39 | 6685119 cheech_wizard
cheech_wizard's picture

Here's something else to think about... Raise the minimum wage, or end the Federal Reserve?

Standard Disclaimer: If you are for raising the minimum wage, then you are basically telling me you are for a continuation of the Federal Reserve which has done nothing but devalue our currency since it's inception. 

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 12:24 | 6685322 plane jain
plane jain's picture

I would prefer sound money to the Federal Reserve. 

But I would also prefer to not subsidize billionaires. 

A lot of people on ZH like to hate on the FSA and low wage workers. Rarely do those same threads include the inconvenient fact that the US doesn't have enough good paying middle class jobs for all of our working age people. So, sure, everyone should try their damnedest to improve their own skillset to get ahead, but there will be losers.

I don't think it is too radical to suggest that an employed person with no dependents working the usual amount of hours should make more than 150% of the Federal poverty line. If a business needs that kind of subsidy to survive then be honest about it - cap their profits at a percentage to keep that subsidy and don't let them double dip by also collecting tax deductions for hiring the poor.

I'm actually pro-business, particularly small business. I would like to see FICA dropped as it is a drag on employment. Just toss it on the pile with the rest of the government budget and finance through income tax; graduated simple flat tax with no tax up to 200% of the Federal Poverty Line if someone wants to make me temporary dictator. Imagine that plus the maligned single payer so that employers would no longer be on the hook for paying for health insurance. Might preserve some employment for awhile and keep us more competitive vs. robots.

Tue, 10/20/2015 - 08:11 | 6688763 Chuck Walla
Chuck Walla's picture

So $7.75 more per hour for breathing (err wasting oxygen) or a percentage increase of 106.9%.

The Independent Payment Review Board can help with this problem. In fact, it is designed to correct the imbalance of the old and/or stupid vis a vis the productive.

 

The Old Fabian, George Bernard Shaw, let the cat out of the bag long ago, that the people should be made to "justify their existence" by producing what they consume and "maybe a bit more", so the likes of Shaw could be "productive" writing and ruling. And those whose existence could not be justified? Dear George wistfully prayed for a "gentlemanly gas" that would rid the world of the useless.

 

No wonder Sanger(lover of Fabian H.G. Wells) found them to be her kind of people. Himmler, Heydrich and Eichman sure liked what they heard and derived Zyklon B to help further the cause of the Fabians.  Remember, Keynes was a Fabian.

 

FORWARD GLOBALIST SOVIETS!

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 13:02 | 6685497 DosZap
DosZap's picture

"The problems for both walmart and mcdonalds stem from their lowest paid workers making too much money.

I dunno, something just doesn't seem right about this"

 

Mostly ILLEGALS to boot.

 

Sadly Walmart is NOT the bargain shoppers paradise.I have seen dozens of food items they are a lot more expensive on than Tom Thumb/Kroger.The only thing I would ever get from Wally Worold is cases of bottled water,CVS/Walgreens, regularly beat their butts on all name brand sodas,Coke,Pepsi,Dr.Pepper, etc,etc.

NO workers on duty, one to oversee self checkout,ans ONE walk thru open early a.m. out of 13 lanes, its always the farthest from self checkout.

For YEARS they have TOLD their suppliers what they would PAY, take it or leave it, and then pay very late on the same.Vendors lose money on Walmart the only way they can make a dime os on volume.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:30 | 6684818 nosam
nosam's picture

At some point the quality is going to go down too. Not that Wal Mart is famous for quality but its going to get worse. Those $10  shirts are going to get thinner and thinner.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 12:04 | 6685091 cheech_wizard
cheech_wizard's picture

Why I shop at Walmart... For the $13 sneakers made in China. They are, after all, dual use. After I'm done wearing them (6 months top), I go buy another pair, and the old ones get to be my dog's next chew toy.

But you go ahead and spend (waste?) your money on Nike's. I'm just a cheap bastard.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 13:47 | 6685764 swmnguy
swmnguy's picture

I have narrow feet with high arches.  Sure, I could buy $13 plastic shoes and wear them for 6 months, half that time with painful strained arches.

I do a lot better buying $120 New Balance sneakers that fit my feet and last 3 or 4 years.  I buy $250 Cole-Haan oxfords that still look new after 10 years, and a couple of $30 heel replacements.

The dog can find his own damn chew toys.  We call them "squirrels" where I grew up.

You're right about Nikes, though.  A $20 show with a $200 logo stitched on.  Using the best stitching in the whole damn shoe.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 14:45 | 6686034 cheech_wizard
cheech_wizard's picture

I do a lot better buying $120 New Balance sneakers that fit my feet and last 3 or 4 years.

My cost at Walmart: Go with the outside figure of 4 years. $13x8=$104...and I have money left over to buy another pair. Sorry you were not blessed with better feet. I just have better things to do with the money than buy whatever happens to be advertised to you as this weeks current status symbol...

Seriously, does this appeal to you?

http://www.newbalance.com/nyc-running-gear-for-men-and-women/?ICID=NYC15...

>I buy $250 Cole-Haan oxfords that still look new after 10 years, and a couple of $30 heel replacements.

However, we are talking sneakers, not dress shoes, and I could agree with you on that point, I will buy quality when necessary. I put a lot of wear and tear on the sneakers, when I am not donning a more expensive pair of work boots.


Mon, 10/19/2015 - 15:30 | 6686238 swmnguy
swmnguy's picture

I only buy the New Balance sneakers because they fit.  They make them in sizes.  So I can get a pair of 11-1/2 A-width sneakers.  The generics, and indeed most  sneakers, are sold in D-width only.  

That link is hysterically funny.  Not something I would buy in the least.

If I could buy a non-branded pair of shoes cut to fit my feet, I'd do it in a heartbeat.  I've worked in and around advertising and Marketing long enough I cut off most visible brand tags.  I can't afford to accidentally wear a pair of New Balance sneakers to a meeting with people from Converse, for instance.

I've never seen a pair of work boots I'd call "Expensive."  Some aren't worth the price, but usually those are the cheaper ones.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 15:10 | 6686143 wizteknet
wizteknet's picture

Management was the big problem when I worked for wallyworld... They the problem

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:01 | 6684709 OutaTime43
OutaTime43's picture

Of course, the increased spending of said workers and its positive effect on the overall economy is never mentioned. Here's a thought.. raise prices a little.. gasp!

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:02 | 6684711 ZeroPoint
ZeroPoint's picture

2016 is shaping up to look like 1940.

 

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:09 | 6684731 yogibear
yogibear's picture

WWII started before that.

It takes time to start a worldwide war.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:06 | 6684719 NoWayJose
NoWayJose's picture

Dear Wallys - being politically correct and removing AR-15s and Confederate flags does not just result in lost revenues from those products - it also results in lost customers!

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:23 | 6684795 E.F. Mutton
E.F. Mutton's picture

Exactly.  Any company that drops their pants for the SJW's obviously doesn't need my money. 

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:37 | 6684838 danl62
danl62's picture

Had to google SJW. Hadn't seen that before. Social Justice Warrior. Pissants of the American culture.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 11:11 | 6684992 InflammatoryResponse
InflammatoryResponse's picture

Thanks for that. :)

 

I had NO IDEA what SJW was.  :)

 

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 12:16 | 6685281 SeekingNuNormal
SeekingNuNormal's picture

have you been living in a cave?  

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 15:14 | 6686159 wizteknet
wizteknet's picture

Where are ur ar-15's? mofos

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:07 | 6684720 Omega_Man
Omega_Man's picture

Credit ends today... nothing on the shelves!!! Go get pasta and rice... everything will grind to a halt... GET AMMO! 

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 15:17 | 6686167 wizteknet
wizteknet's picture

Looking forward to it, fun madmax! Crystal Method, u got it!

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:07 | 6684722 rejected
rejected's picture

Yep,,, Cheap has become ameriKa's theme. Everything has to be cheap. Even have stores with names like Dirtcheap Building Supplies. Quality? Well we don't care so long as it's c h e a p!

Of course when we get it home and it breaks we gripe and complain,,, then go out and see if we can find it cheaper!

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:16 | 6684760 Crocodile
Crocodile's picture

Actually cheap is another form of inflation.  If you ate and bought things of the quality of the 60's; you would find it would cost substantially more, but we would be healthier...maybe.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:48 | 6684887 Creepy Lurker
Creepy Lurker's picture

Rejected made me think of the one time I bought something at Harbor Freight. I bought some clamps thinking: 'These look pretty cheap, but they are so cheap even if I get some use out of them, I'll be ahead.'

They broke in the back of my truck on the way home. LMAO

Don't shop there, don't shop at Walmart either.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:09 | 6684730 jakesdad
jakesdad's picture

http://www.fastcompany.com/54763/man-who-said-no-wal-mart

 

I may go out & buy a new mower this weekend.  I don't need it (our lot is mostly woods & my son uses a reel mower on the little grass we have) but I can afford it & it seems appropriate - maybe I'll give them as xmas gifts this yr?

 

btw - in addition to her $125k/pop speeches to lloyd, jamie, etc hrc used to be on wal-mart's board in the 80s...

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 11:03 | 6684959 Mile
Mile's picture

Make sure you check Walmart's prices on Snapper Mowers. Seems the man who said no to Walmart caved. He probably hired a service to mow his lawn as well.

http://www.walmart.com/search/?query=snapper

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 13:01 | 6685518 jakesdad
jakesdad's picture

well, that is sad to hear...  I remember reading the article when it came out nearly a decade ago...

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:11 | 6684739 Peter Pan
Peter Pan's picture

As I am fond of saying to business people.....margin compression is the root of all evil in business.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:13 | 6684743 LostAtSea
LostAtSea's picture

You can't squeeze blood out of a turnip. At some point, prices will have to rise on everything.  All the tricks have been played: smaller box sizes, squeezing suppliers.  But, the fed has said there is no inflation so perhaps I have it all wrong.

 

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:25 | 6684797 GRDguy
GRDguy's picture

Nah. You're not wrong.  They lied.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:12 | 6684744 Caveman93
Caveman93's picture

That Supply / Demand thingy is a biotch aint it?

 

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:13 | 6684746 Crocodile
Crocodile's picture

Yep, the next K-mart; in many stores it is already there.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:14 | 6684747 pocomotion
pocomotion's picture

Dog eat dog world, I tell ya!  Now look for the return of Mom and Pop locally owned stores.  Big box stores are dying due to usual overhead and overextended.  The thing to invest in just might be DOLLAR stores...  Hmmmm I should look into this...

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:15 | 6684750 taopraxis
taopraxis's picture

Funny what happens to profitability over the years after a handful of people extract, say, a hundred billion dollars out of a business. Public retail companies are very typically grow-or-die speculations. Grow or die...you know, like a financial pyramid. All of America's problems originate at the top but all of the officially sanctioned solutions are aimed at the bottom.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:50 | 6684899 swmnguy
swmnguy's picture

Grow-or-die is the problem, and it's rooted in the foundation of a system where money is actually debt at interest.  Such a system has to collapse, usually once a generation or so, or the debt grows to the point that it can't be repaid.  Then the inevitable crash becomes utterly catastrophic.

I've worked full-time since I was 16 (33 years).  Never for a company with more than 50 employees.  All but 2 of the companies I've worked for (say, about 20 total) are out of business.  Every one went out of business through a bone-headed expansion scheme.  There was a point at each of these companies when all the bills were getting paid, all the employees and the owners were getting paid, business was coming in, and everything was both hunky and dory, all at once.  But that wasn't nearly good enough; the owners got all kinds of alarming advice that they had to grow to survive.  And they all took on shitpiles of debt to grow, and couldn't grow fast or efficiently enough to pay that debt.  Liquidation followed very quickly, every time.  I learned to detect "The Smell Of Death" and get out months before the paychecks bounced, after the first couple times through the process.

On the other hand, I can think of businesses that had been competitors, who resisted all the urgings to grow, who are still in business and doing fine.  Their owners aren't tycoons, but everybody kept their jobs and still gets paid.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 12:30 | 6685351 Imagery
Imagery's picture

THE POST on this thread.  DEBT and the very creators and controllers of same are THIS PROBLEM. Our founding fathers warned YOU of this.  YET, we've now allowed our Legislators, Executive adn Judicial Branches to completely usurp those founding principles. 

Beginning iwth the Federal Reserve Act itself.....unconstitutional....and shepherded in under cover of darkness.

Glass-Stegall killed by Gramm-Leach-Blyly.

2007 Papered over by Bailing out, Off Bal Shting (ENRON) for everyone along with suspension of FASBY GAAP Accounting Requirements, Off Bal Sht Derivative Creation and Authorization by CONgress to allow the FRAUDS to go on, etc, etal..........

We should roll the guillotines today to avoid even further damage and harm certain tomorrow.  These CRIMINALS will never stop voluntarily.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:15 | 6684756 Grimaldus
Grimaldus's picture

Walmart and the rest of the economy are being crushed by big progressive government tyranny. Big mafia government needs to be cut down to size and get the fuck out of business and get the fuck out of my face and my wallet. Big progressive criminal government is the crime here.

 

Grimaldus

 

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 13:06 | 6685543 buzzsaw99
buzzsaw99's picture

wow you must be stoned. without the welfare state wmt would be tits up

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 13:23 | 6685630 Sivad UK
Sivad UK's picture

So would every other major retailler. What's your point?

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 13:56 | 6685806 buzzsaw99
buzzsaw99's picture

dipshit wrote:

Walmart and the rest of the economy are being crushed by big progressive government tyranny...

that's my point asswipe.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:17 | 6684765 Zymurguy
Zymurguy's picture

There have been suppliers to Walmart who have "shrugged" in the past and simply said "no thanks" and stopped supplying them goods.  Some have gone on to be far more profitable and successful.  Someone above ^^^ mentioned the situation as akin to a drug addiction - that's spot on.  Soon these food producers, durable goods producers, etc. will create a co-op and sell their goods in a different format and forget all about Walmart.  Systems like Walmart come and go - looks like Walmart is poised for extinction if you ask me.  Even their business model is getting antiquated.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:20 | 6684781 taopraxis
taopraxis's picture

Just say no to debt and servitude. Simple...

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:18 | 6684771 Gab Timov
Gab Timov's picture

Is Walmart the McDonalds of megastores?

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:19 | 6684775 sudzee
sudzee's picture

"Blood from a stone" comes to mind. 

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:22 | 6684791 GRDguy
GRDguy's picture

Sooner or later, the supplier will have to answer this question:

"Why sign a million dollar contract when it costs more than a million to supply it?"

Death by a thousand cuts.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:25 | 6684796 Catullus
Catullus's picture

"You're no longer my largest channel to market. I don't have these discussions with Amazon. Why should I take a hit on my margins so you can pay a stocking clerk more? Your retailer competitor is working with me to lower costs to market. You call me into a meeting with an analysis of how much you want me to lower my wholesale price to you? You have Sam's Choice. Undercut me if you think the margins and inventory turnover are there."

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 13:40 | 6685739 cornflakesdisease
cornflakesdisease's picture

Let me fix that for you:

 

"Why should I take a hit on my margins so you can put gold lettering on your power boat?"

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 14:42 | 6686018 neuronius
neuronius's picture

Did you see how many Waltons are on the Forbes list?

Get the money from them!

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:27 | 6684802 Gort
Gort's picture

Walmart just needs to put in place a policy to charge their fat-ass shoppers a quarter to use their motorized scooter-carts and their profits will triple.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:39 | 6684847 Peter Pan
Peter Pan's picture

When Walmart closes America might then reopen for business.

 

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 11:13 | 6684841 SillySalesmanQu...
SillySalesmanQuestion's picture

I have no sympathy for Wal-Mart or their suppliers. They have been a large part of the problem for many years of "conditioning" a whole generation of shoppers and corporations that cheaper is better. Suppliers have reluctantly gone along, because when your business is dependent on 30%, 60%, or even 99% of sales to one customer, Wal-Mart, GM, Ford, etc.,at very low, or even mandated margins, you are screwed.
Unsustainable business models, bad fundamentals, high leveraged and mis-managed companies usually end spectacularly and badly, but, this is the new and improved normal. Cooked books, GAAP, stock buybacks, LBO's and outright fraud have masked and hidden all of these glaring deficiencies for far too long.
Greed and expediency have permanently taken over plain, fair and square dealing. Which is why I am no longer a "private enterpriser," something I dearly miss, but choose to no longer participate in...

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:37 | 6684844 Md4
Md4's picture

When “everyday low prices” is the corporate religion, you can’t pass along rising labor costs to consumers. Add it the fact that WalMart’s customers largely belong to the same tax bracket as the company’s meagerly compensated hourly employees and raising prices simply is not an option. "

So, corporate hot shots, what does THAT tell you?

It tells you the middle class is broke, and can't consume as it once did.

Want to do something useful?

Stop pressuring suppliers for the lowest prices, and START pressuring industry to stop outsourcing the means of weath creation in this country: good-paying, middle class manufacturing JOBS.

Consumers can't spend what they don't have.

It has NOTHING to do with raising paltry wages; it has to do with meaningful incomes FIRST.

Your very business practice ENCOURAGED outsourcing.

Well...these are the results.

Shut your whinny mouths, and get busy helping to turn it around, or beat it.

We got along fine without Walmart once before, and I'll bet we can get by without them tomorrow.

Might even be therapeutic too...

m

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:49 | 6684892 Zymurguy
Zymurguy's picture

Jobs going to China are a symptom.

The devaluation of our currency due to debt, over-printing, and fractional reserve lending is the problem.  Congress knows this and that is why they have altered our laws to allow this sort of outsourcing.  If they didn't do this hand in hand with the devaluation of our currency the whole game would have crashed a long time ago.

See, by allowing the goods to become "cheaper" the middle class has maintained an artificial standard of living and remains pacified.

But... all this is simply "borrowing from the future".  We're now seeing that this sort of game always runs its course - the world economy is running out of time.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 12:23 | 6684962 Md4
Md4's picture

Respectfully, that's NOT correct.

Western corporate outsourcing is THE cause of our plight, and it's been occurring for more than 40 years.

We were told over and over by intelligent and knowledgeable people what was going to happen if it wasn't stopped, or at least, seriously slowed, but we didn't listen.

EVERYTHING else we're experiencing now is a function of failed and intellectually-flawed (brainless) monetary and corporate policy (share buybacks) trying, yet again, to shock a fatally-damaged economy to life.

EVERYTHING.

Instead of recognizing the problem, these hacks saved TBTF behemoths, shack buyers (as if deleterious and artificially-inflated shacks represented real wealth; they do NOT), autos (especially, subprime), insurance companies, and all the rest...

...as though ANY of that could restore or replace a first-world economy, given away, without the slightest regard for what happens when the incomes are gone.

The bastards were told, but refused to listen.

We're not coming off the life support (zirp, for example) because there's nothing behind it.

You can't destroy middle class income in a 70% consumer spending-driven economy for more than FOUR decades, replace it with nothing, and expect to maintain a first-world standard of living. Not even the largest economy, nor the Cold War-winning superpower, can do that...as we can clearly see.

It's as simple as that.

It's terribly important we get, and keep, the sequence of events straight. Indeed, it's critical to any effort to successfully redesign a new economy, post-cathartic crash.

These corporate SOB's CANNOT ever be allowed to do this in the future, should we be lucky, painful though it will be, to actually still have one.

m

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 13:50 | 6685772 swmnguy
swmnguy's picture

Short version: Don't cut open the goose that lays the golden egg every day.  There might be a couple gold eggs in there you can get today, but then no more forever after that.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 11:39 | 6685112 Not if_ But When
Not if_ But When's picture

And either fire your own asses or drastically cut your pay since visionary leadership and an understanding of the marketplace is the reason for your f*cking existence as execs in the first place.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:38 | 6684846 yomutti
yomutti's picture

OK, layoffs in China. Why do I care?

 

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:39 | 6684848 world_debt_slave
world_debt_slave's picture

time to remodel some more bathrooms

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:42 | 6684861 Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch's picture

When you are a supplier to a single major client, you have a tiger by the tail and you might end up inside the tiger's stomach.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:51 | 6684871 Lostinfortwalton
Lostinfortwalton's picture

So, why is there a picture of K-mart at the head of the article on Wal-Mart?

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:51 | 6684900 Omega_Man
Omega_Man's picture

cause Walmart is the New K Mart

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 11:10 | 6684985 SillySalesmanQu...
SillySalesmanQuestion's picture

Because Wal-Mart, just like K-Mart, will so too, go the way of the dinasours and the Do-Do birds.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:45 | 6684873 What is The Hedge
What is The Hedge's picture

Walmart raises wages (Quid) Walmart receives favor (Quo)  Just watch closely, it's coming.

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:50 | 6684898 Alpacanio
Alpacanio's picture

F ChinaMart, bring back the Blue LIght Special!

Mon, 10/19/2015 - 10:52 | 6684907 Omega_Man
Omega_Man's picture

suppliers need  to get away from evil walmart and start a cooperative 

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!