George Soros Regrets Supporting Obama, Eagerly Awaits President Hillary
Several weeks ago, we presented a list of CEOs and corporations who have had the highest number of direct visits to the White House and, by implication, president Obama. As we said, these are the corporations (and CEOs) who own the White House, and the US presidency .
One name oddly missing was that of George Soros: the billionaire liberal donor whose fundraising efforts have been critical for the Democratic party in recent years. Which is surprising considering the substantial backing, mostly financial, Soros provided in 2007 and 2008 to a then largely unknown Senator from Illinois.
Or perhaps it is not surprising: a 2012 New Yorker profile of the relationship between the US president and one of the left's most generous donors reveals stormy clouds:
"although he still supports Obama, Soros has been disappointed by him, both politically and personally. Small slights can loom large with wealthy donors. When Soros wanted to meet with Obama in Washington to discuss global economic problems, Obama’s staff failed to respond. Eventually, they arranged not a White House interview but, rather, a low-profile, private meeting in New York, when the President was in town for other business. Soros found this back-door treatment confounding. “He feels hurt,” a Democratic donor says."
Fast forward to December 31, when in the pre-New Year's lull, the State Department released its latest dump of Hillary Clinton emails, amounting to some 5,500 pages, a move Trump promptly slammed.
Do you believe that The State Department, on NEW YEAR'S EVE, just released more of Hillary's e-mails. They just want it all to end. BAD!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 31, 2015
And while it will take the media a few days to parse through all the emails, one already stands out: one revealing not only the relationship between Soros and Obama, but more importantly, Soros and the person who will likely be America's next president.
As the following excerpt reveals, the abovementioned George Soros told a close Hillary Clinton ally in 2012 that he regretted supporting Barack Obama over her in the 2008 primaries and praised Clinton for giving him an open door to discuss policy, according to emails released Thursday by the State Department.
As first reported by Politico, in an email to Clinton, Neera Tanden, head of the Center for American Progress, recounted a conversation she had while seated next to Soros at a dinner sponsored by the liberal major donor club called Democracy Alliance.
After Tanden informed Soros that she had worked for Clinton during her bitter 2008 campaign for the Democratic nomination against Obama, Tanden wrote that Soros “said he's been impressed that he can always call/meet with you on an issue of policy and said he hasn't met with the President ever (though I thought he had). He then said he regretted his decision in the primary - he likes to admit mistakes when he makes them and that was one of them. He then extolled his work with you from your time as First Lady on."
The full email below:
Going back to the NY Mag 2012 article, it added that according to a source, although "Soros might have contributed far more money to Obama if the Administration had engaged with him more intently, he said, “Part of me respects Obama for not spending more time with him. This President doesn’t want to spend a lot of time with donors. You have to admire that.”"
Actually he does, as the chart up top shows it. However, for some odd reason Obama simply did not want to spend a lot of time with George Soros.
The time of snubbing Soros, however, is at an end, as Hillary is well-known for having no qualms about spending "a lot of time with donors", especially since virtually every entity on Wall Street is a donor either directly or to the Clinton Foundation.
Which means that as Obama's time in the White House runs out, and as Hillary prepares to take over the throne (barring some Republican miracle), Soros is about to rectify his mistake from 8 years ago and make sure that the special interest puppet in charge of the U.S., is precisely the one he wanted all along.
Then again, perhaps it is really just Obama's fault, and behind the charming facade is a pool of unlikability. According to another email released yeserday , this time citing Germany's foreign minister circa 2009, Germany's Angela Merkel despised the "Obama phenomenon:"
Sydney Blumenthal sent Clinton a memo on Sept. 30, 2009 with background information on John Kornblum, who was at the time taking over as Germany’s foreign minister. “Kornblum strongly suggests you try to develop your personal relationship with Merkel as you can,” Blumenthal writes.
“He says she dislikes the atmospherics surrounding the Obama phenomenon, that it’s contrary to her whole idea of politics and how to conduct oneself in general. She would welcome a more conversational relationship with you.”
Eight years later, all of America is eager to move on from the "Obama phenomenon." The problem is that the "Hillary phenomenon" is on deck.
* * *
We conclude with a few lines from Ludwig von Mises who 80 years ago described and previewed this twisted, corrupted and politicized mutant that passes for modern "capitalism" in his essay "The Myth of the Failure Of Capitalism", which was published shortly before the coming of Adolf Hitler to power:
“In the interventionist state it is no longer of crucial importance for the success of an enterprise that the business should be managed in a way that it satisfies the demands of consumers in the best and least costly manner.
“It is far more important that one has ‘good relationships’ with the political authorities so that the interventions work to the advantage and not the disadvantage of the enterprise. A few marks’ more tariff protection for the products of the enterprise and a few marks’ less tariff for the raw materials used in the manufacturing process can be of far more benefit to the enterprise than the greatest care in managing the business.
“No matter how well an enterprise may be managed, it will fail if it does not know how to protect its interests in the drawing up of the custom rates, in the negotiations before the arbitration boards, and with the cartel authorities. To have ‘connections’ becomes more important that to produce well and cheaply.
“So the leadership positions within the enterprises are no longer achieved by men who understand how to organize companies and to direct production in the way the market situation demands, but by men who are well thought of ‘above’ and ‘below,’ men who understand how to get along well with the press and all the political parties, especially with the radicals, so that they and their company give no offense. It is that class of general directors that negotiate far more often with state functionaries and party leaders than with those from whom they buy or to whom they sell.
“Since it is a question of obtaining political favors for these enterprises, their directors must repay the politicians with favors. In recent years, there have been relatively few large enterprises that have not had to spend very considerable sums for various undertakings in spite of it being clear from the start that they would yield no profit. But in spite of the expected loss it had to be done for political reasons. Let us not even mention contributions for purposes unrelated to business – for campaign funds, public welfare organizations, and the like.
“Forces are becoming more and more generally accepted that aim at making the direction of large banks, industrial concerns, and stock corporations independent of the shareholders . . . The directors of large enterprises nowadays no longer think they need to give consideration to the interests of the shareholders, since they feel themselves thoroughly supported by the state and that they have interventionist public opinion behind them.
“In those countries in which statism has most fully gained control . . . they manage the affairs of their corporations with about as little concern for the firm’s profitability as do the directors of public enterprises. The result is ruin.
(7 votes)
»
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -
He thought a gay black man would be easier than a frigid white lesbian. I think he's going to be dissapointed either way.
I love how these fuckers have the audacity to call their little club "Democracy Alliance"
Not really. You don't see the word "Republic" for a darn good reason.
I'd like to take this time to bestow upon both of them all my 'athletic' support.
I dont know, messing with the devil (Soros) usually gets people killed. This may be a good thing, even if it happens after his term... Now we just need to infiltrate the dykes inner circles and get her in trouble with ole george.
STFU
it takes lots of peons to keep those maggots going. just saying.
Well lets face it Obama cannot be re-elected.
So blaming him for foreign policy failure is now the way to go to make the Dem slate look clean before Hillary gets top spot.
Soros does know how the cuckoo clock gets "wound up"...
I guess he wants to make a LAST KILLING on the market when Hillary gets elected and the USD will know its "last hurrah" as the curtain comes down on Soros and his Casino games.
Hillary after Bush II and Obama will be like the Reagan-Bush Era. Only worse.
Back then Reagan opened the doors wide open to the Banks for the takeover of America, opened the doors to illegal aliens and built up the Industrial-Miitary Complex. Bush afterwards announced the New World Order after the 1st Iraq Invasion.
After the Bush II opened the doors wide open to the Banks sealing the deal forever of the takeover of America and Obama taking out the door, the walls and the foundations for illegal aliens and builing up even further Bush II's build up of the Industrial-Military-NSA complex, Hillary announces the completion of the New World Order.
40 years after Reagan took office.....and at the end of Hillary's 4 or 8 years.....it's done.
How convenient that you had forgotten Bill Clinton and selling our secrets to China and doing away with the Glass–Steagall Act as well as signing NAFTA.
Clinton did more damage than all the presidents after LBJ combined.
do you remember when he was getting paid to sell Long Beach Port to the Chinese and was stopped at the last minute?
But it sure would have made those Norinco AK-74's a lot cheaper.
One for the porch and another one for drive-bys.
Not convenient. Just had to wipe my memory banks clean after realizing we had elected a confirmed rapist into office. That and the chemotherapy I had to take for my cancer back then didn't do my memory much good either.
Trust me friend. Reagan, Bush I, Clinton I, Bush II, Obama, Clinton II, etc. etc. doesn't matter. They're all equally destructive because they add to the destruction each and every administration.
If I had to pick for the most destructive it would be in no particular order of destructiveness.
1: George Washington : Oversaw the destruction of the 1st Constitution (Articles of Confederation) for the Federalist 2nd Constitution
: Ordered a 13,000 man force (the size of the entire Continental Army) to put down the Whiskey Rebellion with Secretary of Treasury Alexander Hamilton leading the force.
: Oversaw the formation at the insistance of Alexander Hamilton the First Bank of the United States....the forerunner of the Federal Reserve.
2: Abraham Lincoln : 'Nuff said.
3: Theodore Roosevelt : For allowing the bankers to hatch the plan to take over America in the Federal Reserve Act of 1913
4: Woodrow Wilson : For actually being the President that allowed the passage of the Federal Income Tax, The Federal Reserve Act and getting America involved in WW I and the League of Nations, the forerunner of the United Nations.
5: Richard Nixon : For taking America off the gold standard, for normalizing relations with Communist China and for jump starting Hillary Clinton's career as she was assigned duties in the prosecution of Nixon during his impeachment.
If I had to pick one.....it would be Woodrow Wilson.
Falak...
Where's Biden? Anyone seen or heard from him lately?
Why was he not the presumptive nominee for the DNC ticket right from the gate?
Because the DNC knows that they cannot run and win an election on Obama's/Bidens successes.
They can only destroy and attack. And there is too much failure their opponents can point to. They had to get Biden out of the way so that some other demonrats could successfully run by criticizing and attacking Obama and his failures.
Yet we're not supposed to notice that they are ALL demonrats and that they all support the same agenda.
Fill their holes with sand and thorns and fuck each and every last Statist on the planet.
speaking of biden; i read --- but have not confirmed ---- that his, NOW DEAD, son was AG of one of our 57 states, and had that Sinclair faggot, who was one of b hussein homobama's butt fuggin coke buddies, arrested as NOW DEAD Sinclair was on the way to speak with the press about the phaggot marxist muslim racist's activities n lifestyle, shortly before the 08 election. Anyone have any actual Facts to support this contention?
Good luck using that strategy with Hillary running. Anything that she says negative about Obama and people can be quickly reminded that she was part of his administration.
That means that Obama's real approval rating are horrific but we will never see this on MSM, just like the unemployment numbers.
Soros should shut up and fucking die already
Undead zombies cant die, sadly.
In my experience, a .50cal to the head is a marvelous way to summon the Angel of Death.
soros supports anyone he can fund into orifice, despite his recantations
Soros found this back-door treatment confounding. “He feels hurt,” a Democratic donor says."
Like to see how he feels swinging from a noose…
Tells you a lot when this piece of shit is what is driving our democracy. When shit like Soros (and Sheldon Adleson) are the ones picking our leaders, it’s no wonder we end up with Bushes, Obamas, and God forbid another Clinton.
How the hell did Russia get a Putin, what are they doing right? Most likely it is simply the fact that America is filed with cowards, bullies and selfish MFers.
Obama meets in the back room with Soros, Putin kicks him and his ilk out of the country.
The problem is that these arrogant fucks really think that their opinion on foreign affairs should matter to the US gov't. It simply boggles the mind that this asshat thinks anyone anywhere should give a fuck what he thinks.
Russia got lucky with Putin. The money bags in Russia picked Putin because he was a quiet type that they thought they would be able to control.
They did not realize that his demeanor was not because he was easy to control but because he is cold and calculating and processes everything internally before deciding on a course of action.
Someone like Bill Clinton will try to make contact with everyone at the party and wants to be popular and will try to use his fake charm to win people over.
Putin is nothing like that. Putin is old school tough.
One fat old fraud (soros ) advocating another fat old fraud (Hittlery)
It's all downhill from here.
Obama hasn't implemented all of Soros' agenda 21/NWO policies, thats why the old sick fucker is pissed off. He knows cankles' will try much harder. And why does Trump support Bibi? FUCK THEM ALL.
Hopefully Cankles will overdose on fried chicken on the campaign trail and die
I wonder how many food tasters she's gone through?
. . . . and Pussy!
Ever watch that crazy old movie Dune?
Soros and his Bilderberg ilk are the Baron Harkonnen, Bush was Rabban, Obama is Feyd. Hillery is a female Feyd. But all still being run by the Puppetmasters.
Obama was Feyd? gimme a break, thats an insult to Feyd. obama was............hell, i dont know, a worm.
no i got it. obama was the mincy little blond haired she male harkonnen was gonna tear up in that one scene. nasty piece of work that harkonnen.
Baron Vladimir Harkonnen was vastly more competent that the Bilderberg Gangster and Soros combined. If he showed up at 7AM, he'd be running the planet by dinner.
And there ain't NO WAY Obama was Feyd-Rautha...Feyd was a gladiator and as dangerously clever as his uncle the Baron. Obama wouldn't know how to sharpen a knife, let alone kill a hundred foes with one.
You need to read that book.
Well. That partly explains Honeywell's run this last year. Also explains the news stories regarding Honeywell's contracts won lately. I want to teabag David Cote.
Hillary the Early Years - The Battle of Wounded Crotch.
The sooner the US can own up to its relevance and that of its figurehead the sooner the healing process can begin.
Taking 3 steps backwards and ridding yourself of the Neocons pulling the strings would be no shame.
Honestly this is all terribly boring.
I'm seriously considering starting an opiate/benzo addiction so this sort of globalist minutae can just wash over me, instead of penetrating to my rage receptors.
Soros likes to admit his mistakes?
He must be really looking forward to giving money to Hillary.
"and as Hillary prepares to take over the throne"!
As Stalin said, "It's not the votes that count, what matters is who counts the votes."
With US electronic voting tallies being processed in Spain by a company owned by...drum roll...George Soros we can prepare ourselves for the announcement at 8:15 EST that the election will be called for Hillary. Freedom and democracy will be served and civilization will have reached its highest moment?
http://www.snopes.com/politics/ballot/scytl.asp
This is bullshit. Who do you think was on the "other end" of Obamao's Blackberry?
Soros could only send, Obamao could only receive.
The "Hidden Hand".
That old Nazi Soros could care less if he made an "in person" visit. In fact, better for his nasty business to never be seen near the WH.
Moe...
Exactly. It is part of the Statist/leftist M.O. to complain that they are not happy because Politician X didn't go quite far enough in turning the country into a totalitarian gulag. This is supposed to make freedom lovers believe we are somehow winning as we continue to have their leftist crap shoved down our throat. And we are supposed to secretly hope that they get what they want so that they will shut the hell up and just leave us alone and stop driving us over the cliff.
Amazing how successful this tactic has been.
And how tolerant freedom-lovers have been in the face of this gradual tyranny.
God has been putting all leaders in power over His entire globe since man was put on the earth:
Romans 9:17-18 For the scripture saith unto Pharaoh, For this very purpose did I raise thee up, that I might show in thee my power, and that my name might be published abroad in all the earth. (18) So then he hath mercy on whom he will, and whom he will be hardeneth.
Whether it's Oboma, Hillary, Soros, or us; God made us all from the same lump:
Romans 9:20-24 Nay but, O man, who art thou that repliest against God? Shall the thing formed say to him that formed it, Why didst thou make me thus? (21) Or hath not the potter a right over the clay, from the same lump to make one part a vessel unto honor, and another unto dishonor? (22) What if God, willing to show his wrath, and to make his power known, endured with much longsuffering vessels of wrath fitted unto destruction: (23) and that he might make known the riches of his glory upon vessels of mercy, which he afore prepared unto glory, (24) even us, whom he also called, not from the Jews only, but also from the Gentiles?
The difference between the vessel of honor and the vessel of dishonor is our willingness to obey God:
Romans 13:1-2 Let every soul be in subjection to the higher powers: for there is no power but of God; and the powers that be are ordained of God. (2) Therefore he that resisteth the power, withstandeth the ordinance of God: and they that withstand shall receive to themselves judgment.
And His authority until those puppets attempt to usurp our worship of the true God:
Daniel 3:16-18 Shadrach, Meshach, and Abed-nego answered and said to the king, O Nebuchadnezzar, we have no need to answer thee in this matter. (17) If it be so, our God whom we serve is able to deliver us from the burning fiery furnace; and he will deliver us out of thy hand, O king. (18) But if not, be it known unto thee, O king, that we will not serve thy gods, nor worship the golden image which thou hast set up.
Time for some balance...
http://www.infowars.com/romans-13-does-it-mean-what-the-government-would...
Mobius...
The pulpit of the Socialist Gospel commonly misinterprets the directive in Romans that we should submit to our leaders.
The premise that Paul's directive was based on was that the leader was a Man of God and that the governing system was Biblically based.
Paul was not saying the Germans should have submitted to Hitler.
Paul was not saying Americans should submit to this current crop of tyrants.
Paul was speaking to Roman Christians who were living in Rome and under the Ceasar's leadership at that time:
Romans 1:7 to all that are in Rome, beloved of God, called to be saints: Grace to you and peace from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ.
Paul was teaching them to obey their governments authority up to the point where there is no disobedience of Father's Word which is above the law of any nation. Daniel obeyed the authority of his Babylonian captors until they attempted to stop him from worshiping God through prayer:
Daniel 6:9-10 Wherefore king Darius signed the writing and the interdict. (10) And when Daniel knew that the writing was signed, he went into his house (now his windows were open in his chamber toward Jerusalem); and he kneeled upon his knees three times a day, and prayed, and gave thanks before his God, as he did aforetime.
who gives a shit about your 2000 year old work of fiction. Harry Potter is about as realistic and probably a better read....although I cannot say I read it...
"Romans" is old Testament replaced by New, wherein satan has the license. See:Matthew 4:8: Jesus said to him, "On the other hand, it is written, 'YOU SHALL NOT PUT THE LORD YOUR GOD TO THE TEST.'"8Again, the devil took Him to a very high mountain and showed Him all the kingdoms of the world and their glory; 9and he said to Him, "All these things I will give You, if You fall down and worship me."…
Soros has been a very good diciple of Satan and sold out his fellow man, Jewish and otherwise.
Romans is the 6th book of the New Testament :o)
Jesus did not resist satan through force but words only:
Matthew 5:38-39 Ye have heard that it was said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth: (39) but I say unto you, Resist not him that is evil: but whosoever smiteth thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Jesus knew His kingdom is not of this world and His Christians should know this as well:
John 18:36 Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence.
So why fight for something that is just going to be destroyed when Jesus comes to set up His kingdom:
Revelation 19:15-16 And out of his mouth proceedeth a sharp sword, that with it he should smite the nations: and he shall rule them with a rod of iron: and he treadeth the winepress of the fierceness of the wrath of God, the Almighty. (16) And he hath on his garment and on his thigh a name written, KING OF KINGS, AND LORD OF LORDS.
So says the jew book of lies.
The obedience training from the religions is no asset; it's the problem.
The only thing the little Hungarian Zio-Jew boy regrets is the money he's lost on his bets!
And if he decides to live any longer he'll do the same to "Swillery" just because like every Zionist Jew who makes irrational poor decisions that kill and displace millions it means he needs to spend more on his own protection!!!